Paul Bishop's Blog, page 27
May 5, 2017
ALL THE GOOD BOOKS—PART ONE
ALL THE GOOD BOOKS—PART ONE My friend Mary, an omnivorous reader, is a wonderful woman who owned a cramped , but cool independent bookstore near my home. When Mary retired, the store was sold to another wonderful woman who moved it a mile away to a new location. Despite her retiredstatus, Mary volunteers in the store two or three days a week, continuing to help others find great books for which they might not even know they are looking. Mary and I were chatting in the store recently when she confessed she’d celebrated her 86th birthday a week earlier. When I offered my condolences, Mary zinged me a quizzical look and told me in firm tones, “I’m shooting for ninety.” “And I’m sure you’ll make it,” I said, then gestured at the high towers of books forming a literary skyline around us. “I offered my condolences because at eighty-six there can’t possibly be any good books left to read.” Mary’s eyes sparked with a cliché twinkle before she whacked my arm with a left hook she stole from Muhammad Ali. “Don’t be silly,” she said. “You can’t possibly read all the good books—no matter how long you live.”
According to bumper sticker psychiatry there is no such thing as a bad child, only bad parents. Perhaps this existential bit of nonsense can be skewed for the literary world to claim there are no bad books, only bad authors. However, if all books started out good, there are many in dire need of therapy after being screwed up by their literary parents. Over the years, a lot of books have failed to make it past my personal fifty page cut. Basically, if I’m not engaged in a book by page fifty, it’s tossed in the pile destined for a Friends of the Library sale. There seem to be a lot more in this category as my age increases and my patience shrinks. My fifty page cut eventually became a forty page cut, and then a thirty page cut. Currently, it hovers somewhere around twenty-five.
My friend Mary is right—You can’t possibly read all the good books no matter how long you live. Consequently, there is no upside to finishing any book you are not enjoying (unless there are mitigating factors requiring you to deal with the malefactor). Bad books may only be good books forced into bad behavior by their literary parents, but there are too many well behaved books waiting to fill you with wonder and enjoyment.
Many good books grow up to be class valedictorians. These are the books in which you become fully immersed—baptized in the water of their pages—and are often touched with despair whenever you turn their last page. You gently close the covers and are unwillingly transported back into this world—where you are gobsmacked to find everyone is carrying on normally as if your emotional crisis hadn’t occurred. Like Mary, I am an omnivorous reader. Many a genre has fallen before me and yielded up its secrets. I understand too well the anguish of turning the last page of a stunning standalone novel or the last book in a beloved series.
I also know the joy of unexpectedly perceiving a book, a series, or overlooked author through a different and intriguing prism—opening up a whole new realm of obsessive reading. The companion to this experience is discovering an author whose books serendipitously enter your orbit with all the subtly of a hurtling giant asteroid. You tentatively try one title and are immediately captivated by a new world and delight in knowing the author has a huge backlist of books waiting for you to explore. Recently, it has been my good fortune to experience both phenomena. In my pre-teen adolescence of the mid-sixties everything was all about spies. James Bond, The Man From U.N.C.L.E., Our Man Flint, Mission Impossible, I Spy, Secret Agent, The Wild Wild West, Get Smart, and other swinging spies dominate television and the big screen. I was as hooked as any junkie, and my reading habits were all about mainlining related source material, TV tie-in novels, and anything else espionage related the local bookmobile could provide. I discovered Len Deighton’s redoubtable spy Harry Palmer, Donald Hamilton’s all-American agent Matt Helm (the book version as opposed to the nonsense of the Dean Martin movies), and I even came in out of the cold with John le Carré.
When Tarzan of the Apes crossed my path during the same time period, I gave it short-shrift. I read a few pages, realized it was different from the Tarzan films, but somehow it didn’t resonate with me. At the time, my attention and reading tastes were transitioning from spies to hardboiled detective fiction, a genre which would dominate my to be read pile for years to come. Even when I later discovered the joys of detective pulp fiction magazines, I still steered away from Tarzan and others of his jungle brethren. But last year I had the opportunity to read my buddy Will Murray’s recently published and beautifully packaged Tarzan continuation novel, Return To Pal-ul-don. It was brilliant, and I enjoyed it immensely. Maybe there was something to this Tarzan guy...
Based on my experience with Tarzan: Return To Pal-ul-don, I decided I should try one of the original Tarzan novels. I knew I had a couple of the ‘70s Tarzan paperbacks on my shelf—collected not for reading purposes, but for the cool Frazetta covers—and a complete Tarzan omnibus hidden somewhere in the cloud connected to my Kindle, but somehow, I was sidetracked by my then burgeoning interest in Western paperback originals from the ‘70s and ‘80s. Finally, a few weeks ago, I was scouring the audio book shelves at my local library where I spotted an attractively packaged, newly released version of Tarzan of the Apeson CD. I snagged it up and was particularly excited as it was read by my favorite voice actor, Simon Prebble.
By the second track of the first CD, I couldn’t believe how quickly I was being drawn in to the story. Let’s face it, the concept of Tarzan is ridiculous—which may have been one of the reasons I hadn’t been moved to read the books much earlier. But now, with reading maturity and my own writing career and experience to pull from, I consciously began to listen not only to the story, but to analyze how Edgar Rice Burroughs had constructed his magnificent tale. Yes, the concept stretches a reader’s suspension of disbelief, but ERB realizes this and responds with a brilliant counter intuitive choice to anchor his prose in logical progression. Each scene is built logically from the events of the one before—if you accept the first situation as possible, you accept the next logicalprogression as possible, and the next until you have been led into accepting a reality (an orphan raised by apes who becomes King of the Jungle) you would have rejected on its face.
As a reader, your brain accepts this process without question—Yes, that could happen...Yes, that could happen next—and then you are excitedly swinging through the trees with an ape man, engaging in deadly combat with lions and king apes armed only with a sharp knife, and lusting after some dame named Jane. Holy cow! This was splendid stuff brought even more to life by Simon Prebble’s excellent audio performance. Mary was more than right—You can’t read all the good books. There are twenty-four books in the original Tarzan series written by ERB between 1912 and 1965. There are another thirteen authorized continuation novels, including more from my pal Will Murray—who I am holding personally responsible for this new collecting obsession. It appears, my reading dance card is going to be filled for a while as I dip into the promises of the other books in the Tarzan series.
However, my to be read pile—actually, a perilous tower of Babylonian proportions—has grown exponentially with the second phenomena I mentioned (discovering an author—new to you—who grabs your imagination and has a huge backlist of books waiting for you to explore), but the reveal of the experience will have to wait until next week’s column… To visit the official Edgar Rice Burroughs Tarzan website CLICK HERE










Published on May 05, 2017 09:06
May 1, 2017
THE WAR FOR THE POST—APOCALYPTIC SKIES
























Published on May 01, 2017 17:40
April 25, 2017
AT THE MOVIES ~ THEIR FINEST

Call me a sentimental sap if you want, but I thoroughly enjoyed Their Finest, the latest British import filled with stiff upper lip, put the kettle on, we can defeat the Nazis as long as we all do our bit attitude. Their Finest is the type of serio-rom-com nobody does better than the British. Their Finest pokes fun at itself, but always maintains the reserve, dignity, and dry sense of humor inherent in the British cultural DNA. While it is definitely lead actress Gemma Arterton's film, Bill Nighy still manages to steal every scene he's in (as he always does). I would buy a ticket to see Nighy read a census report and know I'd come away amused and entertained. He is a British treasure, and so is this film. My favorite of the year so far, but it will take something really special to top it in my affections...
Published on April 25, 2017 10:46
AT THE MOVIES ~ GOING IN STYLE


Published on April 25, 2017 10:43
April 6, 2017
W.T. BALLARD—INTERVIEWED BY STEPHEN MERTZ


********W.T. BALLARD—INTERVIEWED BY STEPHEN MERTZ
I first made contact with W. T. Ballard early in 1976. I was researching an article on the detective pulp magazines for which Ballard wrote extensively during the thirties and forties, and his response to my questions was generous, informative and entertaining. Since I'd been a fan and collector of his work for some years, I felt that the next logical step should be a piece dedicated to the man himself. This interview is the result.


Ballard, along with Chandler, Hammett and Erle Stanley Gardner, was one of that magazine's most popular contributors among contemporary readers. His series starring Bill Lennox, troubleshooter for General Consolidated Studios, set the tone and laid the ground rules for countless Hollywood-milieu mysteries to follow.
"My life is not particularly interesting," Ballard wrote me when agreeing to this interview. "As Dash Hammett used to say, there are two types of people in the world. Those who make news and those who write about them."
What follows is proof positive that W.T. Ballard is as self-effacing as he is important to the development of the American detective story.********First, the traditional question: How did you come to be a professional writer?

Through a friend I found a job with a small group of local newspapers, the Brush-Moore chain in the Midwest. It was a constant hassle. In eight months I was fired at least eight times. Besides arguments with the printers I had them with the old battle-axe who ran the front office. She had been secretary to the Brush boys' father and considered that she owned the company more than the boys did. It became a routine. She would call me in and fire me, but before I could clear out my desk one or other brother would show up from Europe and rehire me. This went on until one time no one appeared and I stayed fired.

I walked down Hollywood Boulevard like any tourist. There was a big parade in downtown L.A. and the Hollywood streets were all but empty, most businesses closed. But a cigar store newsstand was opened and I stopped to gawk in the window. I had been writing and submitting copy to New York without much success, but there before me was a copy of Detective Dragnet featuring a story I had written months earlier. I didn't take much notice. I had been paid long before and the money was spent. I wandered on and was crossing Cherokee Street when a voice called, "Tod. Tod Ballard..." I looked down the side street and, coming toward me, I saw Major Harry Warner.

Why the Major was impressed by a dime pulp I'll never know, but he was. The meeting culminated in his offering me a job writing for the studio at seventy-five bucks a week. A bonanza at the time. He and his brothers had just taken over First National Studios from Commodore (Commy) Blackton, who had gone broke in New York real estate. I lasted with Warners for eight months—learning a lot about screenwriting from a couple of wise old-timers—before I forgot to watch my back. I made a derogatory crack about Jack Warner, turned my head to find him at my shoulder, and the pink ticket beat me back to my office.
From there, I went to Columbia, an eye-opening experience. Sam Cohan, who owned the studio with his brother, had worked out a crummy deal. A Hungarian, he had brought eight of his relatives over to this country, with no intention of personally supporting them. Instead, he set up an ingenious company, gave each relative a share in the stock, and the titular title of producer to make pictures as independents. Then he would buy these productions and divide any profit with each contributing relative.

Most of our shooting was done inside. We couldn't afford to go out. The studio was located on Gower Avenue. It was known locally as Gower Gulch because of the preponderance of westerns being made on the lots lining the street and the horde of unemployed actors who gathered outside the gates. When we needed a couple of extras, we opened the window and yelled, then stood out of the way of the stampede.
The job lasted six months and exhausted me. I never cared for studio work. I hated having my scripts torn apart by producers, directors, even the actors who had any clout. I returned to freelancing and made a living, but barely.
How did you come to write for Black Mask?
[image error] I caught The Maltese Falcon on radio. My uncle, with whom I was living, was head of the West Coast Customs Bureau. He would come home at night worn out, collapse in his favorite chair, turn the radio volume all the way up, and go to sleep. I wrote in a small study off the living room and could not escape hearing every sound from the box. I had learned to tune it out of my consciousness, but this night excerpts of dialogue forced themselves through to me. Dialogue the way I had always wanted to write it. I had been trying to please Dorothy Hubbard at Detective Story Magazine, a lady who favored the Mary Roberts Rinehart and Agatha Christie styles and types of material. This was something else again. I went to the living room and listened. What I heard was an ad, a teaser for a movie playing at Warner Brothers' downtown theater. I caught a streetcar down and saw the show.
This was not the later Bogie version, but an earlier one starring Ricardo Cortez, who took his stage name from a cigar and acted like it. But I had no interest in the acting. It was the dialogue that enthralled me: Hammett's ear for words sounded the way I thought criminals and detectives should talk. It rang true, the way I wanted mine to do.
The ad gave a credit to Black Mask Magazine, which was the first I had heard of the publication. I left the theater, walked to the corner, bought a copy of the then current issue and read it on the ride back. I felt I was coming home. The story I most remember was written by a boy from Oregon whose family, I later learned, owned the biggest whorehouse in the state. His work sounded authentic.
Bill Lennox was the first hard-boiled series character who worked exclusively against a movie industry setting. Can you tell us something of how you went about creating the series?
The heroes of most of the Black Mask stories were newspaper crime reporters, which I thought could get monotonous. I scratched my head for an alternative and came up with the idea of a troubleshooter working for a studio. I could use my experience in the movie world for realistic background.

I had been nickel and diming along, selling an occasional story to Street & Smith, Short Stories, Argosy and so on. I was paid a quarter of a cent to a cent per word, while supporting my parents and an aunt, long since regretting losing the regular salary from Columbia and having quit my job—much as I had hated it. Along with writing, I was looking for another spot, with no luck.
A week after I mailed the story to Black Mask, I received a letter from Joe Shaw. He wanted some changes made, but he sent along a check with the letter, an unheard of generosity and compassion among editors at the time. The major change he asked for was that Bill Lennox not carry a gun as other fictional detectives did, even newspaper reporters. That reporters went armed seemed odd to me, and that a troubleshooter should go naked seemed odder, but it was not a time to argue with an editor. No one with sense argued with Shaw. So, Lennox went without a gun.
Joe Shaw was a strong guiding force where many of his writers were concerned. Did you have any memorable experiences in your relationship with him as an editor?
I loved Shaw better the more I knew him. He was a curious bastard who wanted to write himself and couldn't. He had been president of a highly successful manufacturing company before the First World War. How he got involved in Europe I don't know, but Hoover used him to deliver relief in Belgium after the armistice, then sent him to Greece.

He wrote two books, both of which Knopf published, not because they were worthy of publication but because Joe wrote them—he was that much appreciated. Both books were bad. I can't remember both titles, but one was Blood on the Curb. At his request, I worked over it with him trying to point out where he had gone off base, but I was not the editor he was. It was an experience, believe me, trying to teach my father how to write.
As I said, I loved him. I sold him more copy than anyone else did, an average of ten stories a year, more than that including characters other than Lennox. Erle Gardner never forgave that I sold one story more to Black Mask than he did during a given period.
Through the years, I have worked with the leading editors of the business. Ray Long, Fanny Ellsworth, Dorothy Hubbard. Erd Brandt. Ken McCormick. Ken Littaur, Ken White, you name them. But none of them offered the help, the assurance, the patience Joe Shaw gave to his writers. It is too bad he has been so overlooked in the history of the craft.

Finally Shaw left Black Mask because Warner and Cody decided to cheapen the quality of the content. Fanny Ellsworth took over and I went along. It was a living. But although Fanny was a good editor, it was never the same as with Joe. At the risk of sounding euphoric, there never was a relationship between editor and writer to equal my connection with Cap Shaw.
Your reminiscences of Raymond Chandler are quoted by Frank MacShane, in his biography of Chandler. Did you know Dashiell Hammett?


Jumping to the other end of the spectrum, did you know Robert Leslie Bellem? He's been called the worst writer of the pulps, yet I've always viewed his Dan Turner, Hollywood Detective series as superb private eye parody.
Yes, I knew Bob I suppose as well as anyone. I can't give you the exact date of our meeting, sometime in the mid-1930's. Soon afterward, we took adjoining offices in an old corner building on Colorado Boulevard in Pasadena and worked there until I left for Wright Field during the Second World War, in 1942. During that period, we collaborated a lot on Frank Armer's Super Detective Stories and a number of other mags. Bob was always a good word man, but had trouble with story, which was my field, and he did not work well under pressure. Frequently, he would blow up, come apart and throw the thing in my lap. That was especially true when the longer pieces became popular. His best work was in short material. He was a pugnacious, small man, but easy to collaborate with, never pretentious about his prose, and we edited each other without many battles.


Incidentally, Bob was not nearly as bad a writer as you make him out. He looked over the markets, chose one he could handle fast and easily, and hewed to the line. And was highly successful in so doing. When he went into television, he was one of the most successful story editors in the trade. He was a generous man, even professionally. Always busy with his and our work, when Cleve F. Adams had a grave illness while in the middle of a detective book manuscript Bob suggested the two of us finish it for him. We did. Cleve was a father figure to the fiction writing group, much loved but a porcupine nevertheless. His comment on reading the finished copy: It's a beautiful...typing job.
For all his popularity with private eye readers during the forties, surprisingly little is known about Adams.
I met Cleve in '31. He and his wife, Vera, had a candy store in Culver City, but he had always wanted to write, and broke in with the old Munsey magazines. With varying success, he continued selling to the pulps until he wrote his first book, Sabotage. It was an instant hit and, on the strength of it, he did seven or eight others. He was good, though hardly in a class with Ray Chandler. He had an exalted regard for his own ability and seldom discussed his work with anyone, including family. I knew him intimately until he died. His son phoned me at four o'clock that morning to tell me Cleve had had a heart attack. He was dead before I could drive over.

One Black Maskwriter who seems shrouded in obscurity is Raoul Whitfield, who just seemed to vanish at the height of his career.
He died in North Hollywood in the early forties. I don't recall what he died of or what he was doing at the time.
Would you tell us something about the lifestyle of a pulp writer living in L.A. during the thirties and forties?
We all worked hard, played hard, lived modestly, drank—but only a few to excess—gambled some when we had extra cash. Most of our friends were other writers. In the Depression, when any of us got a check, he climbed in his jalopy and made the rounds to see who was in worse straits than he and loaned up to half what he had just received.
More and more interest is being shown these days in the detective pulps and those who wrote for them. Are there any pulp writers who are generally ignored today whom you think deserve recognition?
Here are a few from memory. Norbert (Bert) Davis was one of the best with a light style and humor. He killed himself in the odd-forties. John K. (Johnny) Butler who wound up at the studios. Dwight Babcock. Carroll John Daly. Fred Nebel, who was very good.
What was your yearly average word output for the pulps?
My files are at the University of Oregon library, but a shotgun guess would be about or over a million words per year.
Would you tell us something about your work habits both then and now?

How about the marketing of pulp fiction? I've heard many of the magazines (such as Frank Armer's) were closed to most freelancers. Was this a widespread practice?
How did we market pulp fiction? Like selling any other commodity. No magazine I remember was tightly closed to submissions, although a couple of them were written entirely by one or two men for long stretches. It was largely governed by how lazy the editors were, how much they were willing to read.
[image error] Frank Armer was no worse than others, but his editors were crooked. They were pulling old copy out of the files, slapping a current writer's name on as author, and drawing checks to the new names, cashing them themselves at the bar on the corner. Bob Bellem and I combined to send them to Sing Sing for five years each. We discovered the ploy after I received a notice from the IRS that I had failed to report $35,000 paid me by Armer Publications. Since I had sold them no copy for that year, I checked with Bob. He had sold to them, but he was being charged with not reporting twice what he had been paid. We contacted Frank, then blew the whistle. Armer was an open market but Bob did have the edge by a large margin.
After a highly successful career in the detective magazines under your own name, much of your later work has been pseudonymous. Why the switch?
Frankly, the market for detective, especially from picture studios, became very slim and when I was forced into westerns, I chose to use my middle name—Todhunter—to begin with. But unlike the detective publications, the westerns would not absorb enough copy under a single byline to support me. Especially when I jumped to books. The houses would take only one a year, and a name was tied up solely by one house. Therefore, the shift to a long series of pseudonyms under which I could work for several houses at once. They didn't like it. But the practice became common, and they had to go along or do without sufficient submissions. Later, resales to paperback, as they have reverted to me, have been reissued under only one or two noms.
[image error] The private eye series starring Tony Costaine and Bert McCall, which you did for Gold Medal Books during the fifties and sixties under the pseudonym of Neil MacNeil, was unusual in that it featured two lead protagonists instead of one. I thought it was a good idea, well executed. What happened to the series?
I developed the idea and editor Dick Carrol was enthusiastic. Then he died and Knox Burger took over. Burger was chary of the MacNeil byline because he knew the real Neil MacNeil of Washington. D.C., and my use embarrassed him, although it was an honest family name for me. Knox did his best to kill the series. However, the books were popular and went back into reprint over which Knox had no control. It dragged on until Knox felt it was safe and then did kill both the nom and the series. I had no recourse. Knox left the house soon afterward, but the series was gone. I did two books for Fawcett on the Mafia under my wife's initials, P. D. Ballard. We already had a couple of titles out under P. D. which were highly successful. Then the Mafia market collapsed, the old-time editor, Ralph Deigh, retired, a woman came in as managing editor and my boy who had replaced Knox was fired. Is there a single work you look back on as the highlight of your career?



•1. Say Yes to Murder. Putnam, 1942. Penguin pb, 1945. Also published as The Demise of a Louse (as by John Shepherd). Belmont pb, 1962.•2. Murder Can't Stop. McKay. 1946. Graphic pb, 1950. •3. Dealing Out Death. McKay, 1948. Graphic pb, 1954. •4. Lights, Camera, Murder (as by John Shepherd). Belmont pb. 1960. THE TONY COSTAINE/BERT MCCALL SERIES •1. Death Takes an Option. Gold Medal pb, 1958. •2. Third on a Seesaw. Gold Medal pb, 1959. •3. Two Guns for Hire. Gold Medal pb, 1959. •4. Hot Dam. Gold Medal pb, 1960. •5. The Death Ride. Gold Medal pb, 1960. •6. Mexican Stay Ride. Gold Medal pb, 1962. •7. The Spy Catchers. Gold Medal pb, 1966. * Written as Neil MacNeil THE LIEUTENANT MAX HUNTER SERIES•1. Pretty Miss Murder. Permabooks pb, 1962. •2. The Seven Sisters. Permabooks pb, 1962. •3. Three for the Money. Permabooks pb, 1963. NON-SERIES BOOKS•1. Murder Picks the Jury (as by Harrison Hunt). Curl, 1947. •2. Walk in Fear. Gold Medal pb, 1952. •3. Murder Las Vegas Style. Tower pb, 1967. Unibooks pb, 1976. •4. Brothers in Blood (as by P. D. Ballard). Gold Medal pb, 1972. •5. The Kremlin File (as by Nick Carter). Award pb, 1973. •6. The Death Brokers (as by P. D. Ballard). Gold Medal pb, 1973.

Published on April 06, 2017 11:46
March 27, 2017
THE REASONERS’ WHY ~ JAMES AND LIVIA REASONER



















Published on March 27, 2017 15:25
March 24, 2017
ALLIGATOR MAN—BILL CRIDER














Published on March 24, 2017 13:20
March 22, 2017
WRITERS AND FIGHTERS




























Published on March 22, 2017 23:07
THE CZAR OF ACTION NOIR ~ ERIC BEETNER
THE CZAR OF ACTION NOIR ~ ERIC BEETNER
If you want pistol-whipping, boot-stomping, nasty noir, then Eric Beetner is the guy for you—or his books anyway...Eric himself is wonderful blend of kind and cool...He’s the quick-fisted presence behind two of the best Fight Card novels—
Split Decision
and
A Mouthful Of Blood
—with his work since exploding across the hardboiled mystery scene.
Rumrunners
,
Leadfoot
,
The Devil Doesn’t Want Me
,
When The Devil Comes To Call
, and his upcoming
The Devil At Your Door
are just a few of the tough, noir influenced works Eric has published to critical acclaim...As part of an ongoing series of blog posts, I’ve asked the Eric to give us a personal look into the reading habits of writers... Do you mark or write in your books as you read, or does the idea horrify you?
In novels, yes the idea horrifies me. What monster would do that? Now, in reference books it’s another story. Specifically I have several film books where I check off films I’ve seen in genres like Film Noir and Our Gang shorts. I’m sure if you ever investigated my office those books would seem like the obsessive ticks of a madman. How do you keep your place in a book? Bookmark? Dog-ears? Laying the book flat open? I’m a bookmark guy and the great thing about them is that you can make anything into a bookmark. An old receipt. A scrap of paper. A dollar bill. A gum wrapper. A losing lottery ticket. An old photo. Seriously, I’m an artist at repurposing things into bookmarks. Do you have a favorite snack to eat while you read?
I do 90% of my reading while at my lunch break at work so I’m usually covered for eating and reading. The two really do go hand in hand for me. The mark of a good book is if it has multiple stains in it from curry or ketchup or soup. What book did you love as a child? One I really remember is called The Great Cheese Conspiracy. It’s about a gang of mice who live in an old movie house watching old gangster films and get inspired to rob the cheese shop next door. I think it inspired my love of crime fiction at a young age. What book you would read to your kids? Another favorite from childhood I had the pleasure to read to my girls is The Phantom Tollbooth. My girls are reading on their own now so this is close to the last book they let me read to them, but it is such an important book to me. I had to share it with them.
What book made you want to be a writer? I think the one that turned the tide and made me want to commit to crime fiction was A Simple Plan by Scott Smith. Before that I was more omnivorous as a reader, but that solidified the types of stories I like best. Do you read mostly fiction or nonfiction or an even mix? Mostly fiction, but I listen to audiobooks during my commute and I like a good nonfiction listen. Entertainment biographies or histories like Lost In Shangri-La or Frozen In Time, two I can highly recommend.
Do you always read to the end of a chapter or can you stop anywhere? Always to the end. I write like that too. I need to finish a thought before I leave off from the night. Not sure what that says about me. Do you stop reading to look up unfamiliar words? I will, but luckily I don’t encounter that too often. I guess I need to read more challenging books. How do you organize your books—by genre, title, author’s last name, random stacks? By author for the new stuff. I have a huge rack of vintage paperbacks arranged by title since so many are by a single author and I usually know them by the cover and title so if I go searching for something I’m more likely to find it by title.
What is your favorite classic? Oh, man, making me choose! I do my best to read the classics of crime. I know I have a long way to go, but my favorite for now might be The Hot Spot by Charles Williams. It was originally titled Hell Hath No Furywhen it came but the movie title is how it is republished today. But ask me again in 5 minutes and I’ll switch to something else like The Kiss Off or The Big Stealor Rendezvous In Black or Double Indemnity or…or…or… What classic have you never been able to read? Maybe Crime and Punishment? But to be honest I haven’t tried that hard. I know better than to try some classic detective fiction like Agatha Christie because I know it’s just not my thing.
What classic have you pretended to read? I never pretend. I’ll cop to not reading something every time. Talented Mr. Ripley is one I’ve never read but probably should. I own it. Just never read it. What is the last book you read? Justice by Larry Watson. It’s a prequel to his novel Montana, 1948 and it was great. Watson is a bit of a departure for me in that they aren’t really crime novels (though some dark things happen in them) but I absolutely love his writing.
What is the last book you bought? I bought The House Husband by Duane Swierczynski and some guy named James Patterson. It’s part of the Bookshots novella series and it’s great. Also a novel, The Neon Lights Are Veins by Nolan Knight, a local LA writer who we’ve had read at Noir at the Br. It’s his debut novel and I’m excited to dive in. Do you read one book from start to finish, or do you have several on the go? I usually have an at-work book, an at-home book and an in-the-car audiobook. I’m between audiobooks right now waiting for the next one come free at the library. In that case I listen to podcasts.
Do you have a favorite time/place to read? Midday at whatever restaurant I’m in. I’m good to go almost anywhere though, except a moving car. I’ll barf in two minutes flat. Do you prefer series books or standalones? Generally I like standalones, but I’ve come around to more series. Most of my favorite books when I look back at it are standalone, though. What book to movie adaptation have you loved? Back to A Simple Plan. They really nailed it.
What book would you like to see as a movie? Well, any of mine, of course. I’d like to see Gun Monkeys by Victor Gischler. With the right cast, it could be a lot of fun. What imaginary place would you like to live? It’s far away enough to be imaginary and mythical in my mind, but I’d love to have lived and worked in Hollywood in the 1940s. A great time for film. What genre would you read if you were limited to one? Hardboiled crime fiction What book have you returned to again and again? I don’t re-read very much, but when I even think of it I always want to start with Wild At Heartby Barry Gifford.
Is there a specific book or author you find yourself recommending over and over? I think people must be getting sick of me pushing Jake Hinkson on them. His novels are amazing noir done right. Hell On Church St.and No Tomorrow are modern classics in my eyes. I keep a small stack of novels that are doubles of titles I already own and love. If I see one in a Goodwill or a dollar bookstore I’ll grab it just to have it to give away to someone. In that stack now are Small Crimes by Dave Zeltserman, Twisted City by Jason Starr, A Very Simple Crime by Grant Jerkins, The Postman Always Rings Twice by James M. Cain. I just sent a copy of The Terror Of Living by Urban Waite to a friend in Chicago. I love sharing a good book! What was the last novel to make you laugh and the last to make you cry?
Martin Short’s autobiography I Must Say was fantastic. Do the audiobook to get the full effect. In a way it had the funniest and some of the saddest parts of a book so you get both in one volume. What fictional character would you like to have a beer with? Oh, man, I’ll say the Amlingmeyer brothers from Steve Hockensmith’s Holmes on the Range series. Or Hap and Leonard from Joe Lansdale’s series. Both pairs get into a lot of trouble though, so you’d have to watch your back.********Eric’s latest book,
When The Devil Comes To Call
, continues the adventures of aging hitman Lars and Shaine, the high spirited daughter of one of Lar’s targets who has more mayhem in one fist than most men in their entire bodies. The final book in the trilogy
The Devil At Your Door
will be published in April...Also look for
Leadfoot
the sequel to his great hillbilly noir
Rumrunners
... For more books by Eric Beetner
CLICK HERE













Published on March 22, 2017 09:53
March 20, 2017
SIX-GUNS DOWN UNDER ~ BRENT TOWNS












Have you traveled the American west or do you work from research?




Published on March 20, 2017 22:19