Santosh Avvannavar's Blog, page 55

June 5, 2016

Is one member of your group bossy?

Welcome to the next article, today let’s try to explore ‘why sometimes decisions taken by a group seem ineffective?’ I’m sure we all had an experience going out with a bunch of friends to watch a movie with two or several options to choose. Even though one or two might not actually agree to the decision, may be cause didn’t want to sound ‘un-supportive’. Sounds familiar?! People tend to agree possibly of person who takes up leadership position is dominated or bossy, making it difficult to disagree otherwise. This phenomena is termed as ‘Groupthink’. This phenomena occurs when a group makes ineffective decisions for the sake of reaching a consensus. This become a major hurdle for creativity and independent thinking. Just for the sake of group cohesion one need to give up alternatives and confidence to present unpopular decision. This in turn hinders the problem solving ability of the group. This leads to disregarding the idea and accepts illogical approaches to maintain harmony among the members of group. This ultimately leads to low probability of success.


Let’s try to understand the additives of ‘Groupthink’:



Decision makers constitute a cohesive group.
Structural faults of the group (often insulates from outside, directive style of a leader and other factors)
There exists proactive situation context (High stress to bring result, self-esteem is hit low, and other factors)

When the above additives come together in a ‘short time’, pre-decision seem decision taken and the group that does this decision are part of ‘Groupthink’ because:



Overestimation of the group
Closed mindness
Pressure towards uniformity
Omission in survey of objectives and alternatives
Errors in search of information

How does one overcome the ‘Groupthink’?



A framework with rules and process
Participation of every member
Divide into smaller group
Support debate and conflict
Examine alternatives
Invite outside experts
Leaders to hold and reflects opinions
Have a devil’s advocate

I hope we had some interesting understanding on Groupthink. Let’s look into this in our next article. Next week I shall begin with a new topic on ‘Self’. Till then, Good day!


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 05, 2016 20:01

June 4, 2016

Sarbjit: Strong example of Minority Influence

Welcome to the next article, today let’s try to explore can minority (not the religious) influence the majority in decision making? I shall take a example of Sarbjit movie as a case to discuss the next article.


Largely people like to conform to majority because they want to belong to some group, this is termed as normative influence. This exists at home, work and with strangers in a situation. If the world lies one cannot be true! This scenario is sketched in the initial years of struggle of Dalbir Kaur seeking help of her brother Sarabajit Singh who convicted of terrorism and spying by Pakistan court.


Deviation from normative influence is possible when one believes in what they are saying, this reflects at point when Dalbir Kaur makes a point of seeking justice for her missing and falsely convicted brother. This struggle period of a decade that gains in momentum with several others believing in the beliefs, values and behavior. Why one do get to agree to one person? Others often analyse the message that comes out of conviction. The movie tells us that Dalbir Kaur made several attempt that the person to be convicted is walking free. When the content seem right the belief of others automatically matches to the belief of the individual, this is termed as informative influence. The movie progress to show that more and more people conform to the consistent message, this affect is known as snowball effect. What follows this is minority becoming majority. A critical mass stands to seek a solution. The indicates the normative influence that has majority. Initially others who were unsure of the support and have conformed would forget the why and how this change happened, this phenomena is known as social crypto-amensia.


Movies like Sarabjit are important to showcase/stand to others that each individuals could bring the desired change for making the world a better place to live. Next week I shall begin with a new topic on ‘Self’. Why one is important for themselves?’ Till then, Good day!


~Santosh Avvannavar, Author of She: Ekla Cholo Re~


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 04, 2016 05:30

Sarabajit: Strong example of Minority Influence

Welcome to the next article, today let’s try to explore can minority (not the religious) influence the majority in decision making? I shall take a example of Sarabajit movie as a case to discuss the next article.


Largely people like to conform to majority because they want to belong to some group, this is termed as normative influence. This exists at home, work and with strangers in a situation. If the world lies one cannot be true! This scenario is sketched in the initial years of struggle of Dalbir Kaur seeking help of her brother Sarabajit Singh who convicted of terrorism and spying by Pakistan court.


Deviation from normative influence is possible when one believes in what they are saying, this reflects at point when Dalbir Kaur makes a point of seeking justice for her missing and falsely convicted brother. This struggle period of a decade that gains in momentum with several others believing in the beliefs, values and behavior. Why one do get to agree to one person? Others often analyse the message that comes out of conviction. The movie tells us that Dalbir Kaur made several attempt that the person to be convicted is walking free. When the content seem right the belief of others automatically matches to the belief of the individual, this is termed as informative influence. The movie progress to show that more and more people conform to the consistent message, this affect is known as snowball effect. What follows this is minority becoming majority. A critical mass stands to seek a solution. The indicates the normative influence that has majority. Initially others who were unsure of the support and have conformed would forget the why and how this change happened, this phenomena is known as social crypto-amensia.


Movies like Sarabjit are important to showcase/stand to others that each individuals could bring the desired change for making the world a better place to live. Next week I shall begin with a new topic on ‘Self’. Why one is important for themselves?’ Till then, Good day!


~Santosh Avvannavar, Author of She: Ekla Cholo Re~


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 04, 2016 05:30

June 3, 2016

Do group dynamics intensify our opinions?


“My direction is mine, your direction is yours” – Santosh Avvannavar



Welcome to the next article, today let’s try to explore ‘do group interaction effect good or bad?’ A concept that one would move towards their own position than coming to a consensus is termed as group polarization. This happens because of the attitudes and decisions come out in actuality. Lets take an example of group friends over a table for lunch. Few orders ‘chicken’ and remaining orders ‘egg’, the one with chicken persuade to take a bite. On the other hand people may take a bite but might stick to egg over chicken. This is likely to enhances their opinions of their initial choice! This informs us groups often make cautious or risky shift in their decision.


But why do groups polarize? This can attribute firstly to their social comparison that consists of values & beliefs and secondly risk taking attitudes or cautious more. Individuals usually conforms to their choices and line up with their choice. However this can further influence on the information that was otherwise unavailable to them earlier. This is likely to re-position on the arguments but this attitude change doesn’t come merely happen by hearing or observing but by active participation. How do we avoid group polarisation? There are numerous ways of avoiding it, firstly by bringing wide range of experience to look into the information. Secondly, research materials or handouts could be brought if ones’ opinion differs from several others. Thirdly, A group leader who could play devils advocate, by encouraging others to listen/accept the opposing members views.


Let me give an hypothetical situation. I was handling a course that had several failures after the test, as we know success does catch attention failures do! In the discussion everyone were persuading me to be considerate to pass the students. I might likely shift towards others because of the various factors or go against to break the polarization with information to prove the causes.


In nutshell, individuals need to be aware of any extreme attitude changes and the decisions that follow.


I hope we had some interesting understanding on group polarisation. In the next article we shall try to explore, what would happen to the decision that taken by group that keeps beliefs and values aside? Let’s look into this in our next article. Till then, Good day!


1 like ·   •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 03, 2016 19:46

June 2, 2016

Why learned people are unlikely to be politician?

This piece of writing is out of more observations rather backed with research hence views could vary.


Over two decades I have observed that learned people had difficult time to put their foothold to be a politician. Even some who have made it to the top had shaky career in politics. In spite the growth in information excess and dissemination on ‘know your candidate’, before the elections. This information is yet to make a remarkable change in choosing the candidate. I wondered why?!


I see that they way the candidates persuades the voters by the depth of conviction than the height of logic. People who have used the latter are often defeated over the conviction. May be we buckle more to enthusiasm over the proof of credibility. 


Seems logically? What do you think?


Santosh Avvannavar, Author of She: Ekla Cholo Re


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 02, 2016 03:43

June 1, 2016

Curtain Raiser: How did bug happen?

IMG_1149Writing a book is a great responsibility. When you write a blog or article you aim to reach a certain audience, however book intends to reach a wide variety of audience.


Even though Bug is aimed for IT Professionals and Software Testing Community, anybody can read this book as the Daily lives of people working in organizations is unfolded here.


Lets think about the following:



We read a lot of technical books, articles and that helps us a lot in our work
We hear or feel a lot of things between our friends and peers at work, one that impacts our work and also decisions we take

Bug explains b with a little bit of technical jargon mixed.


Not clear ? – Please wait for the book to get launched.


In this article, we like to share with you what ideas we had and which went into the book in a nutshell,



Many IT professionals / freshers / college students now a days know what to read, how to crack interviews. Do they know enough of organizations, people, expectations and so on?
What happens behind the scenes during interview process? If candidate knows such things will it help him succeed in the interview and appreciate the process. 
Many a times after finishing an interview,the candidate might feel   ‘it was a cakewalk’ , but still gets rejected – how does one find answers for such rejections?
Answers given by candidates may be the best but does it resonate to the questions the interviewer asks.
What are various parameters that factor in for selecting the right candidates – Is it just technical skills or anything more?

Book talks about all this and also nice stories of how employees work / talk in an organization. It has drama, action, suspense and a lot of learning.


Updates on the happening: click here


~BUG: Since 2014~


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 01, 2016 22:48

May 31, 2016

48 Birthdays

48 people have birthday today among FB friends list. It seems to be an interesting day! Seems to be a most productive day for doctors! Have a great birthday fellas!


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 31, 2016 23:17

May 30, 2016

Simple & the Best

Simple & the Best : The story is beautifully narrated and holds the reader attention till the end. Watch for the climax, you will be happy reading it. Worth reading. – P Vinay Kumar ‪#‎She‬ ‪#‎EklaCholoRe‬ book review.


Over 100 promising reviews of She: Ekla Cholo Re at : Goodreads


 


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 30, 2016 23:00

Why partying could be dangerous?


“The use of self-control is like the use of brakes on a train. It is useful when you find yourself going in the wrong way direction, but merely harmful when the direction is right.” – Bertrand Russell




Welcome to the next article, today let’s try to explore the causes behind ‘people losing their sense in groups’. I’m sure we have come across characters in the movie that has ‘no life’ – a nerdy, career focused and goal orientated then there is another character that describes oneself as ‘full of life’ – always happy-go-lucky, parties each day and so on. The second character makes the first character to believe that life is no that one s/he is leading, its all about partying! But I see it is as a deceptive character because the likely trend that is likely to follow is decrease in self-awareness and its leads to deindividuation (labelled by Leon Festinger, Albert Pepitone, and Theodore Newcomb). This behavior is often observed on consumption of alcohol. Let’s look into few examples on loss of self-awareness and evaluation apprehension that occurs in a group situations that foster responsiveness to group norms, good or bad.


We have come across lynch mob often believes that they will never be caught or prosecuted, as the action is perceived as a group’s work. Faceless looters are often take advantage of the situation. Now a picture people storming out after watching their team win or lose to celebrate or mourn/vent angry. They can quickly lose self-awareness and create chaos this can be attributed to arousal or distractions. This scenario is observed across several places when their favorite cine star is rested in peace!


These examples suggests us that people fail to make conscious discrimination. Individual consciousness gets replaced by collective unconsciousness.


Does it mean deindividuation is is bad mostly? Certainly not! Deindividuating group experiences such as dancing, worship, positive activity to bring cohesiveness is encouraging.


The bottom line could be, ‘Party! but don’t forget who you are’.


I hope we had some interesting understanding on deindividuation. In a group discussion if some people in a group lingers to their initial inclinations over reaching a consensus, what that would be like? Let’s look into this in our next article. Till then, Good day!





 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 30, 2016 19:50