C.H. Cobb's Blog, page 23

My wild Virginia women

Want to tell you about my wild Virginia women. All three of 'em.






No, no, not her.

That's my wild Iowa woman, aka Doris, aka Football Momma.

She's my favorite wild woman.

Hasn't done as much damage as the other three, though. Not yet, anyway.












No, my three wild Virginia women are Isabelle, Irene, and Sandy.

Now, Isabelle came into my life about . . . hmm. Let me think. Been so many of 'em.

Oh, yeah. It was 2003. Here's a picture. Isn't she just the prettiest thing you've ever seen?



This one was taken by NASA. I've got a raft of my own pictures, but they're there and I'm here so they aren't handy. They're in Ohio, I mean, and I'm in Virginia. Waitin' on the next wild woman, name of Sandy.

Oh, wait. Forgot to tell you about Irene. She wasn't as wild as Isabelle, but it was still an experience.
[image error]

She produced a pretty big storm surge.

[image error]

You can read all about my adventures with Irene, here.

Anyway, now I'm waitin' on Sandy to show up. Typical woman. Takes her a long time to put it all together. She's out in the Atlantic somewhere, gettin' ready, wants to make a real splash when she shows up. You know, grand entrance and all that.

So yesterday we left Ohio, headed for Virginia, me and my faithful navigator.

[image error]

No, you've got it wrong. My navigator's on the left, just over my hand, name of Garmin. That's my copilot on the right.

[image error]
Anyway, it was a good day for ducks and hurricanes. Pretty sloppy weather.













Doris drove a bit, so I got a little work done on Falcon Down.
 [image error]

 But she didn't want to take on the West Virginia Speedway, I mean, Turnpike. So I had to take on the wild West Virginia drivers.
[image error]

Still a dash of color in Virginia. The weather had cleared up a bit, too.
[image error]

So, it's Sunday morning. I've spent some time with Luke, the beloved physician. And now I'm watching the rain on the river, waiting for that wild, wild woman, Sandy.

Shaken to the Roots

"Are you the Expected One, or do we look for someone else?"

This is the question, recorded in Luke 7:19, that an imprisoned, soon-to-die John the Baptist sends his disciples to ask of the prophet of Nazareth, Jesus. It's really remarkable, because John had said earlier, on a better, brighter day,

 “I have beheld the Spirit descending as a dove out of heaven, and He remained upon Him. And I did not recognize Him, but He who sent me to baptize in water said to me, ‘He upon whom you see the Spirit descending and remaining upon Him, this is the one who baptizes in the Holy Spirit.’ And I have seen, and have borne witness that this is the Son of God.” (John 1:32-34, NASB)

John had said, on that bright, sunny day in Bethany,

“Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world!" (John 1:29, NASB)

So what happened? Why is John asking questions in Luke 7:19 about something about which he had had such settled confidence much earlier?

Have you ever been shaken to the roots? Whether by sudden crisis, or a slow but relentless tide of trouble, have you ever been in the positioning of questioning everything, again?

I was backpacking, I've forgotten exactly when or where, when I came across this little scene. A giant of the forest, a great conifer, had toppled, leaving a great hole in the ground where it's root-ball had been. Something had shaken it to its roots, and it could not take the stress.

[image error]

Have you ever been shaken to the roots? Has your faith ever been rocked?

Jesus did not answer John's question with a rebuke, nor did He answer it with a discourse on faith. Instead He asked, "What do you see? Go tell John what you have seen."

“Go and report to John what you have seen and heard: the blind receive sight, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, and the deaf hear, the dead are raised up, the poor have the gospel preached to them. And blessed is he who keeps from stumbling over Me.” (Luke 7:22-23, NASB)

Have you ever been shaken to the roots?

Doubting Christian, sometimes it's helpful to get off the merry-go-round, pull up a chair with a cup of coffee, and remember what you have seen. Recall how your life has been changed, recall how life used to be before Christ. Remember what you have seen Him do in the lives of others. Remember how He has been always faithful.

Have you ever been shaken to the roots? Take a closer look at that picture above. What do you see?

Falcon Down cover photo selected!

Yahoo!
Tonight I wrote a check for the photograph that will adorn the front cover of Falcon Down . The photographer is Kris Klop, of Clear Sky Photography.
I ran across him several years ago, when I was trying to get my first novel published. I was looking for aviation pictures in particular, and located a guy who seemed to be getting pictures of high-performance aircraft from above, below, off to the side and inside, no matter what their attitude or altitude was.
Don’t know how he does it. I don’t know if he’s a daring wing-walker, or has a habit of bumming rides on tanker aircraft or the second seat of two-seaters, or what his secret is, but his photography is simply amazing. He captures airplanes up-close-and-personal. If you are an aviation-aholic, you need to see this web site.
Here's a sneak preview of the cover photo we have selected. It was a tough choice. I perused at least 400 photos while on vacation, and Doris and I made a list of top candidates. The others that were in the running include:F-16Vaporizing the SunF16sMake a TurnF-16Skirt the FluffF-16sat SunsetF-16ChaseF-16Over the CloudsShortFinalF16Returns at nightF16Vaporizes the CloudsBy the way, the Falcon series will consist of four volumes, and I already know that you’ll be seeing at least one of these on the cover of book 2, Falcon Rising.
I’ve got an ISBN for Falcon Down. I’ve started writing the back cover teaser. So look for the print-ready copy of the cover of Falcon Down in the next month or so! 
Though the book itself will not be ready for another six months, I’m really excited about the story. It’s going to keep you on the edge of your seat, and like Outlander Chronicles: Phoenix , it has plenty of unpredictable plot twists and turns.

Granny Gear

Every fiber in my body screamed out, “Stop!” I gasped, trying to breathe deeply, but at 13,000 feet there just wasn’t enough oxygen to satisfy. My pack felt like it weighed two hundred pounds. There was an uncomfortably cool breeze coming up-slope and my sweat was drying in place.

I forced myself to look up. The trail rose ahead of me and became even steeper. I had thought that I was getting near the pass, but then, I had thought that twice before on this long grind of a grade, only to crest a false summit and see the trail stretch on ahead, level for several hundred yards and then up the next incline.

I didn’t want to go on; I couldn’t go on, but I could not stop here, either. I didn’t want to get caught above the timberline by the daily thunderstorms that gathered over the peaks. Even now, I could see the clouds getting organized.

True confessions: I’m neither an athlete nor the son of an athlete.I thought to myself: "There are many backpackers in far superior condition and maybe they would not have even raised a sweat going over this pass.

But they’re not here, and I am, and I’ve got to carry this pack with what strength I’ve got, not what strength they’ve got, and I’ve got to get over this pass and down the other side and into the timber before the weather hits.

And frankly, its not real helpful to think of other guys who could do it better, because right now, I’m the guy that’s got to do it."

There was only one thing to do. Drop it into granny gear and keep moving, so that’s what I did. Granny gear has saved my bacon on more than one occasion.

Everybody’s got a granny gear, and sooner or later, everyone’s got to drop it into granny. Even the young bucks, the athletes. Let me tell you what it looks like.

 First of all, you’ve got to be in the right mood for granny gear. Granny gear is what’s left when you’re done, played out, when you’ve got nothing left but you must keep going. Re-read the first sentence of this essay. That’s when you’re in the right mood for it.

Second, you’ve got to know how to do it. It’s actually quite simple. When I drop ‘er into granny, my stride goes to less than the length of my boot. Depending on the incline, it might go as low as one-quarter the length of my boot. Don’t recall it ever getting any shorter than that.

You just put one foot down after another, making, maybe, six inches of progress with each step. And you just keep going, and you don’t stop. You don’t listen to your lungs, and you don’t listen to your legs, and most importantly you don’t listen to that voice inside your brain that’s begging you to stop. You just keep going.

Third, you’ve got to know where to look—and it’s not down. You don’t look at the trail (you’re moving slow enough where you don’t need to, unless you’ve gotten to a switchback and there’s a dropoff involved). You especially don’t look at the feet of the person ahead of you, if there is anyone ahead of you. Nothing saps your energy like that. Don’t look down.

No, you force yourself to remember why you’re here to begin with: because you are surrounded by the most glorious scenery on the face of God’s green earth, so you lift your weary head and like a thirsty man you drink in the beauty.
Granny gear. Thank God for granny gear. I’ve used it on many occasions, on many backpack trips, and it’s always gotten me to a place where I could legitimately stop and set up camp.

Did you realize, Christian, that not only do you have a spiritual granny gear, but you’ve also got occasions in which God is expecting you to use it? It’s for times when you must go on, and you can not stop, and every fiber in your spirit is saying, “please, can’t I just quit?”

Exactly why do you imagine that someone of the caliber of John Piper wrote a book entitled, “When I don’t desire God, how to fight for joy?” I expect it was because there are times when Dr. Piper finds himself having to . . . fight for joy . Or why do you think that he condensed it into a smaller book entitled, “When the darkness will not lift?” Maybe because he’s experienced that? You think?

Did you know that Charles Haddon Spurgeon, one of the greatest preachers of the last 300 years, wrestled with depression? Did you know that Martin Luther did, too? Did you know that the apostle Paul did, on at least one occasion (read 2 Corinthians 1-7 carefully, and be sure to at least check out 7:6 in the NASB).

Let me share with you a few parallels between backpacking with a granny gear, and walking in Christ.

Your path: Face it, your trail has got one too many, or ten too many, high passes. You’re going to wear out and want to quit. But you can’t quit, you must finish your course, and you can finish your course because He has equipped you to do so. In Philippians 1:6, Paul shares this confidence with us: “For I am confident of this very thing, that He who began a good work in you will perfect it until the day of Christ Jesus.”

Your attitude: High altitudes and the decreased atmosphere can do funny things to your attitude. Something that starts out fun (maybe its even a vacation, maybe you even paid out big bucks to do it) becomes something you no longer feel like doing, no longer want to do. Life as a new believer in Christ can be exhilarating, but sooner or later you will find yourself wondering where the joy went. That’s when you face a fork in the path. You can either take the easy fork that leads back down into the pleasant meadow, or you stay the course, grind it out, and get over the summit. The problem with the easy fork is that when you wake up in the morning you’re still on the wrong side of the mountain.

 The fork you face as a believer is whether you are going to chase pleasant feelings, or learn to walk by faith. A walk by faith is exactly that: nothing confirms that it’s the right way to go except the map itself (the Bible). You don’t feel like doing it, you desperately want to quit, but you don’t. Because you are walking by faith, not by sight (2 Co 5:7). Paul says this about that in 2 Corinthians 4:16-18 “Therefore we do not lose heart, but though our outer man is decaying, yet our inner man is being renewed day by day. For momentary, light affliction is producing for us an eternal weight of glory far beyond all comparison, while we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen; for the things which are seen are temporal, but the things which are not seen are eternal.”

Your altitude: It’s a truism in the Rockies that the higher you go the more beautiful the view. I’ll vouch for that: I’ve found nothing that competes with the grandeur of a vista at thirteen-five, or fourteen thousand. But getting there is a beast, and for me, it almost always requires granny gear at some point. Walking by faith is exhausting, daunting, discouraging. But I’ve heard that the view from the top makes it worth it all. Jesus, for the joy that was set before Him, endured the cross (Heb 12:2). If the earthly tent, which is our house, is torn down, we have a building from God, a house not made with hands (2 Co 5:1). Therefore, “forgetting what lies behind and reaching forward to what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus” (Philippians 3:13-14)

Your posture: if you look down, if you look at the feet of others, the walk becomes misery. But if you will raise your eyes, and drink in the view that brought you here in the first place, which is the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ (2 Co 4:6), you will gain new strength.


Your camp: when, exhausted, you are finally able to set up camp on the right side of the mountain, there’s no joy that compares with the knowledge that you have arrived, and that supper, and rest, is coming. I don’t need to draw the parallels here for you, now, do I? Just think of Paul’s victory cry in 2 Timothy 4:7-8 “I have fought the good fight, I have finished the course, I have kept the faith; in the future there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will award to me on that day; and not only to me, but also to all who have loved His appearing.”

Granny gear. There’s no shame in using it. Nuts, some of us live in it. We all come equipped with it, because the Designer has planned some trails that are going to be rather tough.

And in His love, He gave us granny gear: that ability, empowered by the Spirit of God, to keep moving when we’ve got nothing left, by putting one foot just a tiny bit ahead of the other, over and over again, until we crest that pass.

Don’t quit. Stay with it. In the strength of Christ, you can do it.

Outlander gets an eighth review!

Ken Snell posted a great review of Outlander Chronicles: Phoenix (OCP) on Amazon, giving the book five stars. You can read the review here. Full disclosure: Ken is my son-in-law's dad (but the review was unsolicited).

Sales of OCP have been very slow. The problem is that there is very little visibility to hook someone who's looking for a good book to read. Without an expensive marketing effort, few know the book is even there.Word-of-mouth accounts for almost all the sales.

Amazon reviews are helpful, because they provide additional information and credibilty for the person who just happens to see a title that catches their interest while browsing.

I was belly-aching about the slow sales to Ken in an email, and he reminded me of an important piece of theology that I need to keep in mind: "Rest assured of one thing.... every copy sold has the Lord's plan stamped on it; one day, you'll learn what that plan was for each copy and person!"
It was very encouraging to be reminded of that truth!

I've been working steadily on my next novel, Falcon Down while Doris and I have been on vacation, and reached an important milestone: I am over half-way finished! The manuscript is over 41,000 words in length to date, of a planned 80,000 total. Sometime this fall I anticipate being able to display the cover. 

I've also made progress on my Psalm 90 study, and still anticipate releasing that this fall.

Have you met Jesus' wife?

A fragment of what is reputed to be a fourth-century Coptic document has been loaned to Dr. Karen King of Harvard University. Though it consists of just eight lines of about four words each, Dr. King believes that it could suggest that Jesus was married, and that it might inform the church on issues such as marriage and gender roles in the church. She believes that the fragment might be a translation of a second-century Greek text.Here's a convenient summary of the fragment, including pictures and translation.

Here is a story about the discovery, and Dr. King, who is advancing the notions that she believes the fragment contains. Warning as you read the article: be aware that the concept of "authenticating" the fragment extends only to dating it. If it does date to fourth century, it is considered "authentic." "Authenticity" does not extend credibility to the ideas contained on the fragment, but just to the age of the fragment.

Notice also this line about Dr. King's beliefs regarding the fragment:

"She believes that the context of the eight lines on the front side of the papyrus reflects a discussion Jesus was having with disciples about the “the cost of discipleship,” or how becoming a Christian may affect bonds with one’s natal family, similar to passages in Matthew and Luke."

First, she is assuming that the fragment is in fact a translation from a Greek document written in the second century, even though she has not a scrap of evidence to support such a notion, other than the assertions that the church was already discussing gender issues in the second century.

Second, she is assumingthat this "translation of a second-century Greek text" is an actual account of a discussion Jesus had with his followers, a very tenuous assumption especially when one considers the amount of spurious literature about Jesus produced between the second and fourth centuries.

Third, that she would allow this fragment (even if it were "authentic") to inform the New Testament's position on marriage, discipleship and gender issues says a great deal about her personal view of the infallibility of Scripture.

I have no problem with a theologian or an archaeologist chasing down the evidence to see where it will lead. I just don't care for them making these massive, largely unfounded assumptions and then trying to use them to inform a modern debate which is based on modern notions.

And frankly, because the Scripture is inspired and infallible , it needs to serve as the boundary of our conclusions, rather than being at the mercy of our conclusions.

Does this sound like fideism? May I remind you that if you believe in a literal resurrection of Jesus from the dead, as I do, you are already fideistic, because the resurrection involves a complete and total repudiation of scientific realities regarding death and the decay of a corpse? Any belief in the miraculous, or the supernatural, would be considered fideism in our secularized culture.

 Here's a good response to Dr. King by Dr. Thomas White of Southwestern Baptist Seminary.

And here's a question for you: is the foundation of your faith inspired Scripture, or is it connected to evidences and proofs? Why do you believe what you believe?

Thank You, Lord, for a reliable Bible that proclaims absolute truth!

Bounty from my little garden

I have grown a tomato thicket, a tomato-and-cucumber hedgerow. Don't know what happened out there, but when I go to pick tomatoes I need a pith helmet and a machete. Almost lost Doris in the tangle a week ago. Even my little rubber snakes get lost in there. Okay, might be exaggerating a little. Here, see for yourself. . .


I planted just four (think it was four), small tomato plants. Now they are huge. Trunks are big around as my thumb, maybe bigger. It is a thick, impenetrable, fruit-bearing jungle. This has never happened to me!.

My pepper plants are doing a Jack and the Beanstalk imitation, but I do want to register a complaint against them. Of the four I planted, only three have borne fruit, and not much at that. May need to cut them down with a chain saw this fall, but they've been spending a lot more energy gettin' big than producing peppers.

Here, see my pepper trees?

Must have done something right this spring. These garden plants have flourished. They've all gotten real big, and some, like the tomatoes, have produced prolifically. Now if I could just figure out what I did different from before.


Update on the peas. They grew, sort of. Don't think I realized how often I was supposed to come out here and pick 'em. By the time I got to them they were usually bad. Don't think I'll try these again. The only persnickity thing allowed in my garden is the gardener. High-maintenance plants need not apply.

Update on the lettuce. It did really well, we actually ate a salad and used some for sandwiches as well. I will probably plant this again next year.

Cucumbers were downright wierd, or maybe I've just become accustomed to the perfectly formed samples in the grocery store. Mine twisted into curly cues, fattened into blobs, or just generally took upon themselves a remarkably un-cucumber-like appearance. Really strange. Don't think I picked a classically-shaped cucumber all summer. At least they tasted great.


 But now summer is over, fall has arrived. The cool (cold!) evening temperatures have felt wonderful. I'm ready for the changing of the season.

This is fair warning: I am not going to buy any sno-melt in preparation for winter, nor a new snow-shovel, nor will I make sure my snow blower will start. If I can get away with it, won't even clean the garage (don't tell Doris I said that). No winter preparations.

Last year I did all that and we got no snow . I jinxed it.

This year, I am making no preparations for a snowy winter. None! So look out!

Review of David McCullough's 1776

There’s an unfortunate tendency at work in modern history-writing to diminish heroes. This is accomplished in one of two ways. Either the writer makes normal people into heroes, because they show up for work everyday and accomplish what is expected of them, often times amidst suffering of some sort. Or the writer demonstrates (usually by accentuating their flaws) that so-called heroes were nothing of the sort.
By the measure of such historiographers there are no truly exceptional people, because everyone is exceptional. But such a notion is both intellectually and experimentally vacuous. Think about it: do you know who Mohammed Ali was? How about Lance Armstrong? Or Michael Phelps? Have you ever heard of Albert Einstein? Or Dwight Eisenhower? The existence of awards such as the Nobel Prize and the Congressional Medal of Honor very quickly demonstrates that there are, in fact, real heroes and you and I are not them.
After reading 1776 , it’s easy to identify David McCullough as an exceptional, Pulitzer-prize winning historian. This volume is as close to being a page-turner as history ever gets (and I lovehistory). The book is essentially about a real American hero by the name of George Washington; I’m sure you’ve heard of him. The author does a great job of illustrating Washington’s outstanding character qualities, neither inappropriately diminishing nor embellishing the record. The action of the book all takes place in the fateful year of 1776, though the author is unafraid to introduce earlier and later material to make his points.
Washington is presented as a noble, doggedly determined man of high character, a great leader of men who gets the big picture right. He engenders great loyalty, and is loved by enlisted men, officers, and even the politicians who tie his hands. And yet McCullough does not fall into the trap of hero worship: Washington’s flaws are exposed as readily as his truly great virtues are. He’s indecisive at bad times, terribly inconsistent (fighting for freedom while owning slaves), unremarkable as a strategist, and mistake-prone as a tactician.
And yet, for all that, Washington accomplished a task no one else could have, while juggling the micromanagement of the Continental Congress on one hand, an ill-equipped and untrained army on the other, insufficient funding, constantly expiring enlistments, and a raft of mediocre officers. Washington plays the hand that is dealt him with grace and discipline, even in the midst of terrible mistakes. He manages a war against the most powerful nation on the planet, ultimately defeating far superior forces led by superior officers. General Washington shows strokes of tactical brilliance at the most crucial times.
You walk away from this book knowing that you’ve been learning about a genuine American hero, a truly exceptional man who accomplished a virtually impossible task. If you enjoy history, particularly military history, you’ll love this book.

Review of Torrey's How to Study the Bible

Torrey’s little book on Bible study is composed of eight chapters of good, practical suggestions. He organizes the bulk of the material into particular approaches to study, such as topical, biographical, typological, etc.

The strongest (and longest) chapter is that on individual book study, chapter 2. It contains a step-by-step how-to methodology to approach a book study. This is where Torrey’s little book shines. Most of the other introductory texts contain principles (“observe intimately”, etc). Torrey just cuts to the chase and serves up a recipe for how to move through a study. It’s almost like Robert Traina’s old book, Methodical Bible Study, in pamphlet form.

In a strange inconsistency, Torrey recommends that the beginner choose 1 Thessalonians for his first study, and specifically cautions against 1 Peter, explaining that it contains some significantly difficult texts. Then Torrey goes ahead and uses 1 Peter as his model for the rest of the chapter.

The remainder of Torrey’s book is fairly so-so. Chapter 3 deals with topical study, and it’s pretty good. By the end of this chapter Torrey has shot his wad; there’s not much left. The remaining chapters are all three and four pages long, and are of limited value.

Having said that, this is a good little purchase for someone interested in learning how to study their Bible more carefully. I’d read just chapter one and two, and leave the rest. Chapter two alone is worth the price of the book.

Review of Mayhue's How to Study the Bible

I am preparing a church-level class on Bible study, and I am in the midst of the searching for an appropriate text. It was with great hope that I approached Mayhue’s appropriately-named brief piece on Bible study. Mayhue has a good reputation, according to friends of mine who have attended Masters.
First things first. This is a good book, maybe a very good book. Mayhue has written it at a level appropriate for a general church audience. There’s no off-putting jargon or terminology, it’s written at a level accessible to almost any reader, it’s not too voluminous, and there are good questions at the end of each chapter. This is very likely the text I’m going to pick. While my review below may sound rather critical, I have a feeling that this book will wind up being my “best-in-class” choice.
Mayhue loosely structures the book around the 2 Timothy 2:15 admonition to “cut it straight.” Part One, Making Straight Cuts, contains 5 chapters covering topics such as studying the Bible for God’s approval, an explanation of how the Bible came to be, useful tools for Bible study, and then two chapters on how to study the Bible. Boiled down to bullet points, Mayhue’s steps for Bible study are: affirmation, preparation, observation, investigation, interpretation, correlation (tracing a theme through Scripture), personalization, appropriation, proclamation.
The tools for Bible study are dated, and not commensurate with the level of the book. If a student is going to get Greek helps, for example, I would also assume that he’s going to choose a more advanced book on Bible study. More than likely, he’s going to use web-based resources.
One of the reasons I am just a little lukewarm about this text is because it is too homiletical for my tastes (meaning forced, so that the points have “good homiletical structure” at the expense of plain meaning), and it seems a little lightweight in the observation department. By way of example of the aforementioned two characteristics, I am told to observe singularly, observe carefully, observe thoroughly, observe systematically, observe intimately. Mayhue does an excellent job of fleshing out what he means under each point, but you won’t knowwhat he means intuitively from the title of the point. This part of the book is too brief: most of the errors of the average Bible reader that I encounter start with an inadequate observation of text and context. I would have liked a little more under this heading.
In Part Two, Avoiding Crooked Cuts,Mayhue covers a number of errors and mistakes made by readers (and scholars) of the text. His examples are quite good, but he seems to have invented his own category names for each error, which won’t be helpful if a student using this text then moves on to a more advanced one. This section also carries the distinct feeling of a guy who’s grinding a bit of a theological axe in some of his identification of errors: you can feel the tension between Reformed and Dispensational theology (which makes sense, as it is a tension primarily located in one’s hermeneutics).
Part Three is a short piece on Living Out Your Cuts. Mayhue encourages the Bible student to live consistently with the results of his study. It’s a great admonition.
Strengths of the book: its accessibility, its practicality, its illustrations, its questions at the end of each chapter.
Weaknesses of the book: a little light on observation and correlation, and Part 2, on fallacies, seems a bit uneven.
Overall recommendation: this book is great for a believer who is beginning to understand that there is more to Bible reading than simply letting the book flop open at any uncertain place. It’s a good book for a believer who wants to sharpen their skills in understanding Scripture. It’s a great step up into the rewarding world of Bible study.