C.H. Cobb's Blog, page 21

Noteworthy: from Murray's Humility

This quote comes from Andrew Murray's little volume entitled, Humility: The Journey toward Holiness, pp 61-62. It makes reference to Luke 18:9-14.

The chief mark of counterfeit holiness is its lack of humility. Every seeker after holiness needs to be on his guard lest unconsciously what was begun in the spirit is perfected in the flesh, and pride creep in where its presence is least expected. Two men went up to a temple to pray: the one a Pharisee, the other a tax collecter. There was no place or position so sacred that the Pharisee could not enter there. Pride can lift its head in the very temple of God and make His worship the scene of its self-exaltation. Since the time Christ so exposed his pride, the Pharisee has put on the garb of the tax collector. The confessor of deep sinfulness and the professor of high holiness must both be on watch. Just when we are most anxious to have our heart be the temple of God, we will find the two men coming to pray. And the tax collector will find that his danger is not from the Pharisee beside him, who despises him, but the Pharisee within, who commends and exalts himself. In God's temple, when we think we are in the holy place, in the presence of His holiness, let us beware of pride. "One day the angels came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came with them" (Job 1:6). [Emphasis mine]

I, of course, have no idea how you respond to this. It's part of a larger, and quite excellent chapter (I recommend the book, highly). But as I read this excerpt, I find my heart crying out with Paul (Romans 7:24), "Wretched man that I am! Who will set me free from the body of this death?"

I am the tax collector. But more wretchedly, I am the Pharisee.

"Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord!" Paul says, as he continues in Romans.

Jesus Christ our only hope; but for the one who knows Christ truly, we know that He is a fully sufficient hope. He will complete that good thing He has begun in us (Philippians 1:6). And that's worth celebrating!

Thessalonians: The blessing of an intensive pronoun

Seven times in the NASB translation of First and Second Thessalonians does the English word “himself” appear. Five of those times it functions as an intensive pronoun, meaning you could drop the word from the text, and the text would still make sense (see 1 Thess 3:11; 4:16; 5:23; 2 Thess 2:16; and 3:16). The intensive pronoun emphasizes, or intensifies, the personal noun that it follows.
For example, in 1 Thess 4:16 we are told that “the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout.” Himself in this case emphasizes that it is Jesus descending, as opposed to, say, an emissary who represents Jesus. The amazing fact that it will be Jesus personally (Jesus Himself) who will be descending is emphasized or pointed out.
The payoff in this thought comes in these three verses:1 Thess 5:23: Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you entirely . . .2 Thess 2:16 Now may our Lord Jesus Christ Himself and God our Father . . . comfort and strengthen your hearts . . .2 Thess 3:16 Now may the Lord of peace Himself continually grant you peace . . . Here’s what’s neat: contrary to what some religions teach, it is not a mediator or mediatrix (such as Mary or a saint) who secures blessings (sanctification, comfort, strength, peace) to us: it is God Himself, Jesus Himself! God Himself is personally, immediately (in other words, without a mediator other than Jesus) involved in your life!
If you know Christ as Savior, you are not distanced from Him by layers of heavenly bureaucracy. He personally, immediately, immanently, is involved in your life. He truly is, Immanuel, God with us!

Mine, all mine . . .

Psalm 39 is my psalm.
Sorry, bub; move along; you’re going to have to find your own psalm! Thirty-nine is mine!
Many of David’s psalms I don’t identify with so well. For example, I don’t have any real enemies; at least, I don’t think I do. So the “save me from all my enemies” psalms sort of zoom right past me. The penitential psalms I identify with completely. I’ve had ample opportunity to pray them. But the ones that complain about enemies, not so much.**
Except Psalm 39. You know who the enemy is in that psalm? David is his own enemy. He’s being chastened for sin: Remove your plague from me; because of the opposition of your hand I am perishing. With reproofs You chasten a man for iniquity;(vv 10-11a).
And he’s got his nose bent out of joint about it, so he’s afraid to speak in public: I said I will guard my ways, that I may not sin with my tongue; I will guard my mouth as with a muzzle while the wicked are in my presence (v 1).

Ever been in a really bad mood? You know they can read it on your face. And you know your attitude is sinful. And you don’t even want to open your mouth, because you know whatever comes out won’t be in keeping with Ephesians 4:29. Ever been there? Me? Seems like I make a visit there several times every day, at least.
Anyway, David did not want to dishonor God anymore than he already had by his sin (of which we know nothing). So he was keeping his mouth shut. But he knew what was going on: I have become mute, I do not open my mouth, because it is You who have done it (v 9). He knew that his troubles at that moment were from God's chastening rod.
So he’s biting his tongue. In fact, he’s not saying anything, good or bad: I was mute and silent, I refrained even from good, and my sorrow grew worse (v 2).
Finally he’s had enough and gets by himself (I’m reading that into the psalm), and begins to pour out his complaint and seek his God: My heart was hot within me, while I was musing, the fire burned; then I spoke with my tongue: Lord, make me to know my end and what is the extent of my days; let me know how transient I am (vv 3-4).

Are you your own worst enemy? The fact of the matter is, unless you have reached some exalted state of sanctification, you probably are. I know I am. Maybe I ought to speak for myself, though. I certainly don’t know your heart. Don’t even really know mine (Jeremiah 17:9). But this I do know: no low-down, lop-eared, son of a gun gives me as much grief as . . . I do .
Anyway, I like how this psalm runs its course. I can identify with that, too. David’s still struggling at the end of the psalm. He’s not wearing some syrupy sweet grin and a “Smile, Jesus loves you” pin. Instead, he’s still crying out, Hear my prayer, O Lord, and give ear to my cry; do not be silent at my tears; for I am a stranger with you, a sojourner like all my fathers (v 12).

I can’t really identify with the sentimental “my dear Jesus, sweetest name I know” lingo. I know folks who talk like that and really think like that, and who really do mean it.
I’m just not there, not yet anyway. Terms like, sovereign Lord Jesus Christ, Lord God Almighty, Ancient of Days, and so on, speak far more to me than the personal intimacy stuff. And now, Lord, for what do I wait? My hope is in You. Deliver me from all my transgressions; make me not the reproach of the foolish (vv 7-8). Now, that’s my language.
Like I said, buddy: move over and find your own psalm. This one’s mine.
[**The main reason for this, I believe, is that Christ faced and defeated those enemies for me on the cross. Those psalms are largely (but not exclusively) Christocentric. I say not exclusively, because when we do find ourselves with actual enemies, we’ll find those psalms on our lips. I expect this is especially true of the persecuted Church. If I ever undergo such persecution, I’m sure that I, too, will identify more closely with those beautiful psalms.]

Almost there!

Dani just finished this great looking front cover. The word count is just shy of 60,000, which is at three-quarters of my target. Getting close, can't wait. Click on the image to go to the Falcon Down page on my website.

Book Review: What is the Gospel?

Gilbert, Greg. What is the Gospel? Wheaton: Crossway, 2010.
Truth is being assaulted from all sides in our day. From the capitulation of the Biologos cadre, to the crass man-centeredness of Osteen, to the “God is an American conservative Republican” cultural Christianity crowd, there are voices out there to confuse believers, distort the truth, and eviscerate biblical Christianity. It’s time someone wrote a book reminding us what the gospel is, and what it isn’t.
Greg Gilbert’s brief (124 pages), accessible offering, published by Crossway under the 9Marks imprint, is just what the doctor ordered. Gilbert carefully points the church back to a biblical understanding of the gospel, and along the way he manages to distinguish between the results of the gospel and the gospel itself. It does not help people much if we talk in glowing terms of kingdom and cultural transformation if we haven’t made clear how one gets through the door. As he gently corrects, Gilbert’s tone is not polemical; he’s not going to alienate anyone, whether they are lost or merely confused about the gospel.
The book contains but eight chapters, four of which cover these topics: God’s righteousness, man’s sinfulness, Christ the Savior, and the response of faith and repentance. Gilbert reminds us that one does not need to be a Princeton grad to understand that Jesus died for my sins.
One of the great things about this book is that you can give it to an earnest seeker, and know that they will be exposed to a simple, solid, accurate, biblical, and compassionate explanation of gospel. I plan on keeping a box of these things in my study for just that purpose.

Book Review: Team of Rivals

 Goodwin, Doris Kearns. Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of AbrahamLincoln . New York: Simon & Schuster, 2006.
This is one of those books so thick that they ought to publish it with a set of wheels. That said, it is a fascinating exploration of the character and genius of Abraham Lincoln. Goodwin studies four main characters, Lincoln, plus the other men who were seeking the Republican nomination in the 1860 presidential election, Salmon Chase, William Seward, and Edward Bates. She traces the life of each, from childhood through their tours of duty on Lincoln’s cabinet in the dark days of the Civil War.
Goodwin does a masterful job of not only displaying (with a great deal of accompanying evidence) the character of each man, but how their political machinations throughout their lives either helped or hurt their political ambitions, ultimately culminating in Lincoln’s election. She documents the open disdain with which Lincoln’s rivals held the “rail splitter from Illinois,” and shows how everyone underestimated his intelligence and the shrewdness of his own political maneuverings.
Lincoln invites his rivals to serve in his cabinet, placing each man in a position where he can’t say “no” to the opportunity, and then patiently manages the fireworks that ensue from the clash of egos and ambitions at the top level of his administration. At each turn in the story, Goodwin shows how Lincoln outfoxes the newspapers, the politicians, the political parties, and his own cabinet members.
The genius of Lincoln, Goodwin demonstrates, is not that he “kept his friends close and his enemies closer,” but that he managed to turn enemies into allies, calling forth from each man the best of their gifts and skills in the service of a nation badly in need of strong leadership. Lincoln’s character (especially his humility) is seen in that many of his most contemptuous rivals became his most devoted friends, once they began to work closely with him. Edwin Stanton’s heartbroken tribute at Lincoln’s deathbed, “Now he belongs to the ages,” put a voice to the quiet awe in which many of Lincoln’s compatriots held him at the end.
This is a terrific book, from multiple aspects. First, I am guessing you won’t find a better, more complete accounting of the run-up to the 1860 presidential elections, and then Lincoln’s management of his administration. Second, it is an outstanding study of leadership and character. Third, it is a great biography of Lincoln. And last, it is so well-written, so well-documented, so detailed that Goodwin held my attention from the first page to the last. I recommend it highly.

Book Review: Understanding Scripture

Grudem, Wayne, Collins, C. John, and Schreiner, Thomas R., eds. Understanding Scripture: An overview ofthe Bible’s Origin, Reliability, and Meaning. Wheaton: Crossway, 2012.
Without question, this is one of the best basic Bible introductions that I have read. Using a series of nineteen essays by eighteen different scholars, the editors have woven together a comprehensive introductory exploration of all the major questions that surround the phenomenon we call the Bible.
Part 1 addresses the issue of Bible interpretation. A sketch of the process of Bible interpretation is provided, showing due sensitivity to the issue of genre, followed by a good summary of the history of interpretation. As is true in the rest of this little volume, the two chapters are just the right length to tease out the major issues without burying the introductory reader in a flood of detail.
Part 2 explores five different reading strategies with which one can approach the text. This is clearly the most devotional part of the book, and the editors have chosen well for the contributors, with names like Packer, Piper, and Powlison. In reading this section, students might be tempted to blow through it and get to chapters with more technical details such as canon, or the use of the Old Testament by the New. But the reader should not forget that the whole point of studying Scripture is to, well, read it, and to read it with ever-increasing understanding. This section might well be where the payoff for the book is located.
Part 3 investigates the issues and problems surrounding the concept of the canon of Scripture. The Old and New Testaments are treated separately, as the canon issues between the two are quite distinct. An excellent chapter on the Apocrypha is also provided.
Part 4 delves into the reliability of the manuscripts and questions of textual criticism. The level of detail is just right for an introductory work, and the two testaments are again dealt with in two separate chapters. Part 5 continues that pattern by devoting a chapter each to archaeology and the Old and New Testaments. Plenty of examples are given, although it would have been nice for a few pictures to have been included in these chapters.
Part 6 was devoted to the biblical languages. This section was either the weakest, or strongest part of the book, depending on the level of detail you are looking for. Peter Williams got into an astonishing amount of detail regarding Hebrew, for a layman’s introductory text. I enjoyed this chapter immensely, I suspect my students got somewhat lost in it. It will certainly give the average man on the street an great appreciation for those who know Hebrew well enough to translate it. David Black took a very different approach with Greek, and dealt with characteristics of Koine, the range of Greek styles in the New Testament, and some basic linguistics. The section concluded with a great chapter on the Septuagint. Peter Gentry handled this section and included in it several pages on translation strategy (functional versus formal equivalence).
This is probably my major criticism of the book. Gentry’s paragraphs on translation strategy should have been expanded into a complete chapter on the history of the English text and the translation rationales behind the myriad modern versions. He did a great job handling the issues, and I wish he’d been asked to contribute a whole chapter on it.
The final part, on Old Testament and New, included a chapter on the history of salvation by Vern Poythress, and a chapter on the New Testament’s use of the Old, by C. John Collins.
This is a terrific lay-level textbook for Bible Introduction. It’s too short (203 pages) and too basic for graduate use, and possibly even for undergraduate use. But in the church, which is where I am using it, it is perfect in terms of its writing level and content complexity. I highly recommend this book for personal or church classroom use.

Mile-high Mistake

Football Mama and I just finished watching the Denver Broncos break our hearts. Tell me now, why do you take a kneel-down with 31 seconds left in regulation, when you've got the best quarterback in the league and a better than even chance of getting close enough for a field goal?

Especially when you've no guarantee of winning the toss in overtime, and you could lose by sudden-death if Baltimore scores a touchdown!

Well. There went the season. Denver made too many mistakes, at both the coaching and player level, and Baltimore was just too strong. On the one hand, Denver gave it to them on a mile-high silver platter. On the other hand, Baltimore earned it by making fewer mistakes, and consistently stronger play.

Phooey. Now I've got an entire season to brood about it. Go Packers.

In case anyone is paying attention, last year, with a quarterback reputedly not good enough to play in the NFL, Denver won it's first playoff game, beating the former SuperBowl champion Steelers in an away game.

This year, with the best quarterback in the league, Denver loses at home, even though its special teams contributed two touchdowns to the effort.

Tebow should be given a chance somewhere. Just sayin' . . .

List of Twelve Top Books

In Sunday's message, I encouraged folks to make an intentional effort to grow in Christ this year. The text was from Paul's own testimony in Philippians 3:7-16, and the critical point was that "pressing toward the mark of the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus" implied specific, strenuous effort.

It is this passage in which we see clearly that sanctification is, as Jerry Bridges puts it, a "joint-venture" between us and God. Paul says in verse 12, "I press on so that I may lay hold of [our part of our own sanctification, notice the implication of effort] that for which also I was laid hold of by Christ Jesus [God's part of our sanctification]."

In any case, among the practical suggestions that I gave for areas of growth in which to strive in this new year, was a recommended reading list of good books. I've been asked to provide this list, so here it is. Note that the list is weighted heavily toward theology in general, and the holiness of God in particular. While it contains some samples of application (Priolo, Viars, Metzger, and one of Bridges), these books are more about knowing God than they are practical Christian living.

There are multiple reasons for that. One of them arises out of the text. Paul speaks in verse 8 of "knowing Christ my Lord," and verse 10, "that I may know him." Our deepest errors are not failures of practice, but a failure to know God, and the truth about God, properly. I would argue that all failures of practice can ultimately be traced back to a defective knowledge of God, and a defective love for Him.

In no particular order, here's the list:

Pursuit of Holiness, Jerry BridgesKnowledge of the Holy, A. W. TozerBasic Christianity, John StottThe Dangerous Duty of Delight, John Piper Evangelism and the Sovereignty of God, PackerHoliness of God, R.C. SproulKnowing God, JI PackerRespectable Sins, Jerry BridgesHeart of Anger, Lou PrioloTeach them Diligently, Lou PrioloPutting your past in its place, Steve ViarsTell the Truth, Will Metzger
There are many excellent books that could be added to this list. Most of these on the list are books I find myself turning to over and over again. A few are recent additions that I believe are "best in class" or close to it.
God has given the church teachers (Ephesians 4:11). Use them. Pick them well, pick them carefully, but use the teachers with which God has blessed His church.

Wahoo!

Finished fixing the Falcon Down manuscript! Yesterday's investment in reading the Style and Template portions of the Open Office Writer Guide was time well-spent. I have fully finished reformatting the manuscript with proper styles and fixed all the problems with italics. Now I'm moving on with the story itself (it's over 50% complete at this point).

If you're wondering what all this is about, you may read the first three chapters of Falcon Down right here. I'm anticipating that the book will be available around the first of May. Here's the preliminary version of the back-cover blurb:

Flying low, slow and blind over a moonlit Bering Sea, Major Jacob Kelly put his sleek F-16 fighter through its paces on a Project Hydra test flight. He didn’t know that an air-to-air missile from a Soviet fighter covertly trailing him was about to start a sequence of events that would place him into a desperate fight for survival. Incarcerated in a secret facility deep within the Soviet Union, Kelly discovers the most daring and ruthless program of international espionage in the history of the Cold War. He faces torture, interrogation, and certain death—unless he can escape . . .
 
Falcon Down is the first in a series of four novels from author C. H. Cobb that bring the two superpowers to the precipice of war in the turbulent final decade of the Soviet Union.