Roman Piso's Blog: The Roman Piso Blog - Posts Tagged "arrius"
Genealogy Of Roman Emperors
A part of my study of the subject of the Roman Piso family and their involvement in the creation of Christianity is in just who their ancestors, relatives and descendants were.
What I learned in my studies of the subject is that virtually all of the authors (either secular, biblical/church writers), popes and emperors were descendants of Arrius Calpurnius Piso.
Knowing this, changes the entire context of how we should now view all of those things as well as the histories involved.
This link will give you access to many of the genealogical charts that I worked out for many of the Roman Emperors.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/romanpiso
What I learned in my studies of the subject is that virtually all of the authors (either secular, biblical/church writers), popes and emperors were descendants of Arrius Calpurnius Piso.
Knowing this, changes the entire context of how we should now view all of those things as well as the histories involved.
This link will give you access to many of the genealogical charts that I worked out for many of the Roman Emperors.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/romanpiso
List of the First 10 Popes
The research which Abelard Reuchlin, I, and other members of The Piso Project have done, have taken us very far. We know many things. I had, at one time, all things noted in exacting detail. However, many of my notes were lost or destroyed. Thus, I am now trying to reconstruct as much of that as I can.
Our research confirmed that Arrius Piso and his family were the main creators and promoters of Christianity. Therefore, one may conclude that the early Church figures, such as Popes and Church Writers, were, in fact, the Piso's, their close relatives, and descendants.
I don't think that I am able to post an image file to this blog; if so, I don't know how to do that. So, if you check elsewhere here in Goodreads, you should find that image file with this list.
Our research confirmed that Arrius Piso and his family were the main creators and promoters of Christianity. Therefore, one may conclude that the early Church figures, such as Popes and Church Writers, were, in fact, the Piso's, their close relatives, and descendants.
I don't think that I am able to post an image file to this blog; if so, I don't know how to do that. So, if you check elsewhere here in Goodreads, you should find that image file with this list.
The Piso Project
As one of the world's foremost experts in the area of the creation of Christianity, I have made many discoveries and have founded The New Classical Scholarship (NCS), and The Piso Project.
The Piso Project is an ongoing effort to find and provide evidence of the Roman authorship of the New Testament; particularly that of the Roman Piso family.
On FB (Facebook), there is a Piso Project Page, and a Piso Project Group. Here is the URL for the Piso Project Group. You will find much information there regarding our work and findings.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/15029...
The Piso Project is an ongoing effort to find and provide evidence of the Roman authorship of the New Testament; particularly that of the Roman Piso family.
On FB (Facebook), there is a Piso Project Page, and a Piso Project Group. Here is the URL for the Piso Project Group. You will find much information there regarding our work and findings.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/15029...
Arrius Piso & His Family
ARRIUS PISO AND HIS FAMILY: An example of deduction.
(04/12/01, by Roman Piso)
To find out about Arrius Piso and his immediate family (his wives and children), one must look to “The Vita” of Flavius Josephus. He also ‘salts’ information about his children throughout the New Testament.
In the ‘Vita’, we learn the following;
Arrius Piso was first married to a virgin of Jotapata, and that he divorced her. No children are mentioned from this marriage. His second wife* is a bit of an enigma, but I do think that her identity may someday be revealed to us by deduction. She is a wife (at Alexandria, Egypt), who was with Titus at the siege of Jerusalem. Arrius Piso had divorced her as well, but he had three children with her before doing so. He says that two of those children are ‘dead’ (at the time of his writing the Vita). We think presently that one of those ‘dead’ sons was really a daughter (Claudia Phoebe),** and the other was the son named ‘Alexander’. The remaining son from that marriage who was still alive was Julius Calpurnius Piso.
His third wife had lived at Crete, but she was a Jewess by birth. Because of what he says about his third wife, she appears to be Boionia Procilla/Procla. He never says that he divorced his last wife, and he says that she bore him two children. Those children are known to us as (Fabius) Justus Calpurnius Piso, and Proculus Calpurnius Piso.
Now, in the Vita, he also gives the year of birth for his three living sons. He does so by saying that they were born during certain years of the reign of emperor Vespasian. So, we find out by deduction that Julius Piso was born in 74 C.E. And that Justus Piso was born in 77 C.E. Proculus was born in 79 C.E. This is information that tells us much more than just the birth dates of these sons, it also tells us Arrius Piso was still with his second wife up until at least 74 C.E. and that he married his third and final wife sometime before 77 C.E. This, is what logic, reason and deduction are all about.
To summarize…
The birth dates of these sons are given by Arrius Piso as Josephus in the beginning of his ‘Vita’. He says; “I have three (living) sons…” And Justus and Proculus Piso’s mother was a Jewess who had lived at Crete. Arrius Piso had divorced his first and second wives. His sons Alexander*** and Julius were of the same mother - his second wife.
Now, Arrius Piso counts his invented character Jesus as a ‘son’ as well. But he does so in the sense or context of that ‘son’ being an invention. So, that is why in Matt. 13:55, he says that Jesus has four brothers. But of real sons, he has only three which were living. Since the ‘core’ or prototype of Matthew was written around the year 75, we can deduce that either these sons of Arrius Piso were added to it after they were born or it was not truly finished until all his sons were born. Meaning that Matthew was not really finished until sometime AFTER 79 C.E (the year of birth of his last son, Proculus Piso).
* His second wife was of/at Alexandria, Egypt and was apparently of the line of the ‘Alexanders’. We might be right to speculate that her name may have been ‘Alexandria’ as the feminine form of one of her sons name - Alexander. I do think that we may be able to deduce just who she was at some point.
** Recently, Abelard Reuchlin has become convinced that Claudia Phoebe was NOT the daughter of Arrius Piso. But I think that she still could have been his real daughter and that researchers were just thrown a ‘curve’ by those ancient authors. Claudia Phoebe could still have been Arrius Piso’s daughter - IF she was the daughter of/by his second wife who he had divorced, and if she then remarried someone who adopted her - then passing her BACK into the house of her real father (Arrius) who then likewise
“adopted” her as well (even though she was really his own daughter anyway!).
*** Alexander, like his mother, is an enigmatic figure. Abelard Reuchlin says that he was placed in the New Testament as ‘Andrew’. And Andrew is found in Matt. 4:18, 10:2. Mark 1:16, 1:29, 3:18, 13:3. Luke 6:14. John 1:40, 1:44, 6:8, 12:22. Acts 1:13. He may also have been the person mentioned as a kinsman of Paul who is called ‘Andronicus’ in Romans 16:7. As Reuchlin says, Alexander appears as a disciple named Andrew - who is the/(a) brother of Simon Peter. Reuchlin says that he died about the year 95 C.E.
Ref. “The True Authorship of the New Testament,” page 12. People have tended to think that the ‘Junias’ mentioned in Romans 16:7 was a female. But when you know that Alexander and Julius Piso had the same mother, and you know that letters such as ‘l’ and ‘n’ were interchangeable and that information was given by the use of phonetics, then you can see that passage read; “Salute Andronicus and JULIUS, my kinsmen…” Putting Andrew/Alexander (as Andronicus) together with Julius, confirms what we had found in the Vita - that these two brothers belonged together as they both shared the same mother.
(04/12/01, by Roman Piso)
To find out about Arrius Piso and his immediate family (his wives and children), one must look to “The Vita” of Flavius Josephus. He also ‘salts’ information about his children throughout the New Testament.
In the ‘Vita’, we learn the following;
Arrius Piso was first married to a virgin of Jotapata, and that he divorced her. No children are mentioned from this marriage. His second wife* is a bit of an enigma, but I do think that her identity may someday be revealed to us by deduction. She is a wife (at Alexandria, Egypt), who was with Titus at the siege of Jerusalem. Arrius Piso had divorced her as well, but he had three children with her before doing so. He says that two of those children are ‘dead’ (at the time of his writing the Vita). We think presently that one of those ‘dead’ sons was really a daughter (Claudia Phoebe),** and the other was the son named ‘Alexander’. The remaining son from that marriage who was still alive was Julius Calpurnius Piso.
His third wife had lived at Crete, but she was a Jewess by birth. Because of what he says about his third wife, she appears to be Boionia Procilla/Procla. He never says that he divorced his last wife, and he says that she bore him two children. Those children are known to us as (Fabius) Justus Calpurnius Piso, and Proculus Calpurnius Piso.
Now, in the Vita, he also gives the year of birth for his three living sons. He does so by saying that they were born during certain years of the reign of emperor Vespasian. So, we find out by deduction that Julius Piso was born in 74 C.E. And that Justus Piso was born in 77 C.E. Proculus was born in 79 C.E. This is information that tells us much more than just the birth dates of these sons, it also tells us Arrius Piso was still with his second wife up until at least 74 C.E. and that he married his third and final wife sometime before 77 C.E. This, is what logic, reason and deduction are all about.
To summarize…
The birth dates of these sons are given by Arrius Piso as Josephus in the beginning of his ‘Vita’. He says; “I have three (living) sons…” And Justus and Proculus Piso’s mother was a Jewess who had lived at Crete. Arrius Piso had divorced his first and second wives. His sons Alexander*** and Julius were of the same mother - his second wife.
Now, Arrius Piso counts his invented character Jesus as a ‘son’ as well. But he does so in the sense or context of that ‘son’ being an invention. So, that is why in Matt. 13:55, he says that Jesus has four brothers. But of real sons, he has only three which were living. Since the ‘core’ or prototype of Matthew was written around the year 75, we can deduce that either these sons of Arrius Piso were added to it after they were born or it was not truly finished until all his sons were born. Meaning that Matthew was not really finished until sometime AFTER 79 C.E (the year of birth of his last son, Proculus Piso).
* His second wife was of/at Alexandria, Egypt and was apparently of the line of the ‘Alexanders’. We might be right to speculate that her name may have been ‘Alexandria’ as the feminine form of one of her sons name - Alexander. I do think that we may be able to deduce just who she was at some point.
** Recently, Abelard Reuchlin has become convinced that Claudia Phoebe was NOT the daughter of Arrius Piso. But I think that she still could have been his real daughter and that researchers were just thrown a ‘curve’ by those ancient authors. Claudia Phoebe could still have been Arrius Piso’s daughter - IF she was the daughter of/by his second wife who he had divorced, and if she then remarried someone who adopted her - then passing her BACK into the house of her real father (Arrius) who then likewise
“adopted” her as well (even though she was really his own daughter anyway!).
*** Alexander, like his mother, is an enigmatic figure. Abelard Reuchlin says that he was placed in the New Testament as ‘Andrew’. And Andrew is found in Matt. 4:18, 10:2. Mark 1:16, 1:29, 3:18, 13:3. Luke 6:14. John 1:40, 1:44, 6:8, 12:22. Acts 1:13. He may also have been the person mentioned as a kinsman of Paul who is called ‘Andronicus’ in Romans 16:7. As Reuchlin says, Alexander appears as a disciple named Andrew - who is the/(a) brother of Simon Peter. Reuchlin says that he died about the year 95 C.E.
Ref. “The True Authorship of the New Testament,” page 12. People have tended to think that the ‘Junias’ mentioned in Romans 16:7 was a female. But when you know that Alexander and Julius Piso had the same mother, and you know that letters such as ‘l’ and ‘n’ were interchangeable and that information was given by the use of phonetics, then you can see that passage read; “Salute Andronicus and JULIUS, my kinsmen…” Putting Andrew/Alexander (as Andronicus) together with Julius, confirms what we had found in the Vita - that these two brothers belonged together as they both shared the same mother.
Napoleon & The Holy Roman Empire
If you thought you knew about Napoleon Bonaparte, you will need to read this paper. This gives so much more, such very different, information about Napoleon than you had ever thought possible.
This covers Napoleon's relationship with Emperors and Popes, how and why he brought down The Holy Roman Empire, and how WWI and WWII are involved. This also gives Napoleon's family tree going way back!
If you are a student and need to write a report about Napoleon, you need this information!
Napoleon Bonaparte And The Holy Roman Empire
This covers Napoleon's relationship with Emperors and Popes, how and why he brought down The Holy Roman Empire, and how WWI and WWII are involved. This also gives Napoleon's family tree going way back!
If you are a student and need to write a report about Napoleon, you need this information!
Napoleon Bonaparte And The Holy Roman Empire
Rhetoric & Propaganda In The New Testament
This is an extremely important paper. It details and explains the use of several complex literary devices that were used by the authors of the New Testament texts; including rhetoric, propaganda, and even disclaimers.
In my other work on the subject of the Roman authorship of the New Testament, I also demonstrate and explain a) the irreverent jokes and references that the authors had made in the original Greek texts, as well as b) information that they deliberately put into those texts that allow us to date those texts, and c) find out the true authorship.
Once you read this, if you are a thinking person who can appreciate facts in evidence, you will have to agree with our findings. Please share this info with others.
https://pisoproject.wordpress.com/rhe...
Rhetoric & Propaganda In The New Testament. A MUST read! Please share this info with others. Everyone should know this.
http://www.academia.edu/15092789/Rhet...
In my other work on the subject of the Roman authorship of the New Testament, I also demonstrate and explain a) the irreverent jokes and references that the authors had made in the original Greek texts, as well as b) information that they deliberately put into those texts that allow us to date those texts, and c) find out the true authorship.
Once you read this, if you are a thinking person who can appreciate facts in evidence, you will have to agree with our findings. Please share this info with others.
https://pisoproject.wordpress.com/rhe...
Rhetoric & Propaganda In The New Testament. A MUST read! Please share this info with others. Everyone should know this.
http://www.academia.edu/15092789/Rhet...
True Meaning of 666
This is information that I want everyone to have regarding the number '666'. If you have been following my research and reading my books, articles, essays and other papers, you know that we have exposed the Roman authorship of the New Testament.
We have also revealed that Arrius Calpurnius Piso's son Julius Piso, was the author of The Revelation. And, we know many of the reasons why he said the things that he did in The Revelation. If you have no clue as to what it really says and means, then it may appear as rants and ravings. However, when you know what is really being said in it, you know that he was giving essential information to expose Christianity as a deliberate FRAUD!!!
Thus, everyone needs to know the truth and it will set you free!
666 - Piso Numbers & The New Testament
Roman Piso
http://www.academia.edu/15042254/666_...
We have also revealed that Arrius Calpurnius Piso's son Julius Piso, was the author of The Revelation. And, we know many of the reasons why he said the things that he did in The Revelation. If you have no clue as to what it really says and means, then it may appear as rants and ravings. However, when you know what is really being said in it, you know that he was giving essential information to expose Christianity as a deliberate FRAUD!!!
Thus, everyone needs to know the truth and it will set you free!
666 - Piso Numbers & The New Testament
Roman Piso
http://www.academia.edu/15042254/666_...
The Roman Piso Blog
Welcome to The Roman Piso Blog. Many people have been searching for answers regarding Christianity for hundreds of years. Now, we finally have the answers long awaited.
Here in this blog, you will be a ...more
Here in this blog, you will be a ...more
- Roman Piso's profile
- 6 followers
