R.J. Snell
![]() |
Acedia and Its Discontents: Metaphysical Boredom in an Empire of Desire
4 editions
—
published
2015
—
|
|
![]() |
Mind, Heart, and Soul: Intellectuals and the Path to Rome
by |
|
![]() |
Authentic Cosmopolitanism
by
6 editions
—
published
2013
—
|
|
![]() |
The Perspective of Love: Natural Law in a New Mode
3 editions
—
published
2014
—
|
|
![]() |
Through a Glass Darkly: Bernard Lonergan & Richard Rorty on Knowing Without a God's-eye View
2 editions
—
published
2006
—
|
|
![]() |
Subjectivity: Ancient and Modern
by
2 editions
—
published
2016
—
|
|
![]() |
Convergence: Essays on the Intersection between Philosophy and Theology
by |
|
![]() |
Concepts of Nature: Ancient and Modern
by
4 editions
—
published
2016
—
|
|
![]() |
Philosophia Christi (Volume 12, Number 1)
by |
|
![]() |
Lost in the Chaos: Immanence, Despair, Hope
|
|
“Moderns are tempted to consider the world as what Heidegger termed “standing reserve,” an undifferentiated set of resources awaiting our use. Rather than having the status of creatures full of God’s weight, things are just there, standing at attention before our desires, waiting to be led around on a leash. Things of the world become objects distanced and alienated from us, problems to overcome with some sort of method or technique. For the medievals, a thing known—a tree or cat, say—was a subject of being, it held its own act of existence, whereas we view things as objects. As subjects, creatures had interiority, a form or nature or essence that we did not create but were nevertheless bound to recognize. Now things are objects under our judgment, waiting to be captured in a sketch and cast aside. If we are not bound by the things, but they by us, what limits our use other than our own will? In what way can our desires be ordered so as to respect the integrity of things when their meaning is determined by the awful lightness of our whims?”
― Acedia and Its Discontents: Metaphysical Boredom in an Empire of Desire
― Acedia and Its Discontents: Metaphysical Boredom in an Empire of Desire
“Dependency does not reduce value but rather grants dignity, a notion fundamentally counter to those for whom the freedom of birds is insulting. God’s glory does not diminish ours, and our dignity is not a threat to God, for God’s own glory, in part, is us. The glory of God is present to things as the graciousness of their being; things are never just themselves, they carry the weight of God along with them.”
― Acedia and Its Discontents: Metaphysical Boredom in an Empire of Desire
― Acedia and Its Discontents: Metaphysical Boredom in an Empire of Desire
“When misunderstood autonomy governs our life, it is inevitable that the dignity of others must be rejected, for everyone else threatens our unchecked sovereignty. This terrible covenant is especially acute given the new power of technology. Not only have we freed ourselves from the bonds and bounds of creation, but we have alienated ourselves from them, declaring them enemy. Not only against the physical world, although that too, but also other persons and ourselves, as everything is bleached out and rendered defenseless against our frightful autonomy. Finding the world as nought, and ourselves as unchecked, we consume ourselves and all other creatures. To be free as we wish requires hatred of being, even hating life itself, just as Evagrius warned. As John Paul II recognized, this “encourages the ‘culture of death’ creating and consolidating actual ‘structures of sin’ which go against life. The moral conscience, both individual and social, is today subjected . . . to an extremely serious and mortal danger.”10”
― Acedia and Its Discontents: Metaphysical Boredom in an Empire of Desire
― Acedia and Its Discontents: Metaphysical Boredom in an Empire of Desire
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite R.J. to Goodreads.