Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 8
September 20, 2025
Israel Wants ‘Aerial Corridor’ Over Syria to Strike Iran
by Kyle Anzalone | Sep 17, 2025
Tel Aviv’s primary objective in discussions with Damascus is to establish an aerial corridor over Syria so Israel can restart its war against Iran.
Axios reports that Israel presented the Syrian government, led by Ahmed al-Sharaa, with a maximalist agreement that would establish a no-fly zone over Syria. Additionally, Tel Aviv wants a large swath of Syria, from the Israeli border to Damascus, to become a demilitarized zone.
An Israeli source told the outlet that an essential part of the agreement will be maintaining the ability to use Syrian airspace to attack Iran. “A central principle of the Israeli proposal is maintaining an aerial corridor to Iran via Syria, which would allow for potential future Israeli strikes in Iran,” they said.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu started an unprovoked war with Iran in June. Tel Aviv targeted leadership in Tehran, nuclear facilities, and scientists. President Donald Trump joined the war by striking three Iranian nuclear sites that Israel lacked the military capability to destroy.
Israeli forces currently occupy southern Syria. Israel promised to withdraw its troops from Syria if Damascus accepted the agreement. On Wednesday, Sharaa said a deal with Israel was possible “in the coming days.”
Tel Aviv made a similar agreement with Hezbollah, where Israeli soldiers were scheduled to withdraw from South Lebanon after Hezbollah moved its forces out of the region. However, after the Hezbollah withdrawal, Tel Aviv maintained its occupation. Israel is now demanding that Hezbollah entirely disarm.
The Israeli invasion of Syria began after President Bashar al-Assad was overthrown by al-Sharaa last year. Al-Sharaa, formerly Abu Mohammad al-Jolani, is the founder of al-Qaeda’s Syria affiliate. President Donald Trump has met with Sharaa and lifted some sanctions on Syria in a push to get Damascus to make a deal with Tel Aviv.
[…]
Via https://libertarianinstitute.org/news/israel-wants-aerial-corridor-over-syria-to-strike-iran/
Netanyahu trying to kill Israeli captives through Gaza starvation
This screengrab from a video released on August 1 by the armed wing of Hamas shows Israeli captive Evyatar David in Gaza.
Press TV
A senior official with the Palestinian resistance movement Hamas says Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu seeks to kill Israeli captives through starvation after failing to locate and kill them in airstrikes.
In a statement on Sunday, a Hamas Political Bureau member said Israeli captives are also being affected now by the starvation and thirst policy that Netanyahu and the “Nazi” administration have imposed on the people in Gaza, emphasizing that the Israeli regime shoulders full responsibility for their condition.
“When Netanyahu could not find the hostages and kill them through airstrikes, he is now trying to end the matter by starving them,” Izzat al-Rishq added.
He noted that the Palestinian resistance forces observe religious and humanitarian principles in dealing with Israeli captives, sharing their own food and water with them as they do with the wider Palestinian population.
The Hamas official emphasized that those Israeli captives who were released in the previous prisoner exchanges in good physical and mental health are now suffering from hunger, weakness and weight loss — mirroring the plight of besieged Gaza residents.
In January, a temporary ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas led to the release of several captives and Palestinian abductees held illegally in Israeli jails.
However, the Israeli regime refused to extend the deal as initially planned, choosing instead to intensify its military assaults on Gaza by shattering the 2-month deal.
Dozens of the captives have already been killed in Israel’s indiscriminate and relentless bombardment of the Palestinian territory, and now, the Israeli-imposed starvation is taking its toll on them, too.Al-Rishq said the Israeli prime minister’s policy of oppression against people in Gaza has also affected the captives and that he is trying to discipline them through cruel hunger.
Palestinian and Israeli rights groups say that 50 Israelis remain captive in Gaza, including 20 believed to be alive, while the Israeli regime is holding more than 10,800 Palestinian detainees, many of whom face torture, starvation and medical neglect.
Israel has launched a genocidal war on Gaza since October 7, 2023, after Hamas-led resistance groups waged the surprise Operation Al-Aqsa Flood against the Zionist entity in response to the regime’s decades-long campaign of bloodletting and devastation against Palestinians.
The regime’s bloody onslaught on Gaza has so far killed more than 60,800 Palestinians, most of them women and children, and injured some 149,500 others.
Thousands of victims are also feared trapped under rubble, inaccessible to emergency and civil defense teams due to Israeli attacks.
[…]
Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2025/08/04/752463/Hamas-Israel-PM-captives-starvation-
US Civil War Department
Dmitry Orlov
A stunning announcement recently came from the White House over in Washington: the Department of Defense (DoD) is being renamed back to War Department with billions of dollars to be spent on signage, stationery, shingles and military swag.
The War Department existed for 158 years, from August 7, 1789, to September 18, 1947, when, under the National Security Act of 1947, it was split into the Department of the Army and the Department of the Air Force which, together with the Department of the Navy, formed the National Military Establishment, which, in turn, was officially renamed the Department of Defense (DoD) in 1949
DoD is a misnomer par excellence and an instance of rank hypocrisy. Not counting terrorist attacks, the last time the US was attacked by a foreign military, forcing it to defend itself through military action, was during the war of 1812, although even then it went on the attack and invaded Canada (unsuccessfully). Since then, it was all about attack. The US formally declared war against Mexico, Spain, Germany, Austria-Hungary, Japan, Germany, Italy, Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania.
The US also attacked or invaded various other countries without a declaration of war: various Native American Nations, China, Korea, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Cuba, Guatemala, Grenada, Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Panama and Yugoslavia. To this already long list we could easily add Australia, Bahrain, Djibouti, Guam, Jordan, Kuwait, the Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Turkey and various others, which the US military occupied by placing permanent military bases on their territory, which is always a violation of national sovereignty. Therefore, the Department of Offense (DoO) or the Department of World Occupation (DoWO) would have been more appropriate names, but War Department will do.
But from the vantage point of 2025, this renaming seems nostalgic because the image of the world in which the US could attack random countries with impunity, hiding behind two oceans, is quickly fading. Of the last two major US military engagements, one — in Afghanistan — ended with a withdrawal that to most observers looked like a shameful rout, and another — in the Ukraine — is still ongoing but has turned into a process by which Russia is taking its time to humiliate not just the US proxy regime in Kiev but its US owners and all of NATO as well.
Russia has the luxury of doing so. After three and a half years of its Special Military Operation in the former Ukraine, Russia has made major strides in fine-tuning its military production to fit the reality of modern warfare, where the frontline is as much as a hundred kilometers wide and continuously scrutinized by drones and satellites and where the pace of technical progress in areas such as electronic warfare and AI-enhanced drones is measured in weeks, not years.
An essential point is that at present Russia’s Special Military Operation in the former Ukraine amounts to a huge and highly successful advertising campaign for Russia’s military-industrial complex. Its goal is to demonstrate to the rest of the world that it is quite possible to not just oppose or contain, but to defeat the US military in a war of attrition. The way for any self-respecting country to achieve this result is by buying Russian weapons systems and by sending its officers to Russian military academies. The Russians run this kinetic advertising campaign in a way that minimizes casualties on their side while showing gradual but constant progress.
The Americans provide weapons for the Russians to demonstratively destroy on the battlefield while enhancing their military superiority. For example, the Russians have safely disposed of most of the Bradleys, Abrams tanks and other US-provided armor using Lancet drones, which can now take care of their own targeting, picking out and destroying armored vehicles even when they are camouflaged. The Ukrainians’ only function at this point is to provide ample cannon fodder; their job is to simply die by one or two thousand a day, although surrendering or simply running away are increasingly popular options.
All the while, Russia has managed to build up trade with China, India, Vietnam and other eastern nations to replace its trade with the EU and to use US and EU sanctions as an opportunity for import replacement, including high-tech areas such as jet aircraft, gas turbines, helicopter and marine engines and much else. Russia’s position in the world vis-à-vis two of the world’s most populous and fastest-developing nations — China and India — is as a preferred trading partner and ally.
This was recently demonstrated by both China’s and India’s refusal to yield in response to US pressure for them to stop trading with Russia. On top of all that, Russia has done all of this while maintaining macroeconomic and political stability and steady economic growth and development of its social sector. A healthy majority of its population wants the Special Military Operation to end in outright victory while Putin’s approval rating hovers around 80%.
Russia is not alone in its opposition to US attempts to act from a position of strength and to project force around the world. The military parade which was held earlier this month in Beijing was meant to demonstrate China’s rapidly developing military might. It is on track to match the US in sheer numbers in another five years, perhaps sooner. However, unlike Russia’s military, China’s People’s Liberation Army is not battle-tested. Its last bout of hostilities was with Vietnam and was far from successful.<
Nevertheless, the ability of the US to contain China has become severely constrained. For instance, China (along with Russia, Iran and possibly others) now has anti-ship missiles which can reliably sink US aircraft carriers from a stand-off distance greater than the reach of the carriers’ on-board aircraft, making the US aircraft carrier fleet — the supposed pride and joy of the US Navy — worse than useless. However, it is politically impossible for the US to simply scrap its aircraft carrier fleet and so it is forced to maintain what is now essentially a toy navy at a staggering expense while having it sail about randomly, avoiding danger zones, in order to “show the flag.”
No longer able to project force in any meaningful manner, the US (and its proxy Israel) have been forced to resort to political assassination — a terrorist technique, essentially — recently killing the entire Iranian negotiating team and, even more recently, attempting to kill the Hamas negotiators near Doha, Qatar. Such non-Kosher negotiating techniques make negotiating with the US or its proxies a personally dangerous exercise and generally inadvisable, making it safer to act as a fearsome enemy to the US rather than as a partner or, perish the thought, a friend. As the US establishment gets hungry, its friends and partners will be first to be eaten, as is now happening to Europe and Japan.
It has gradually become clear that Donald Trump understands all of this. Although he produces a steady stream of nonsense, both via his social media posts and his press conferences, which randomly fluctuates from day to day in both content and character, this is all an effort to obscure his actual goals. He has realized that the US can no longer extract tribute from Russia, or China, or India, or any number of other nations, whose leaders have observed how America’s Ukrainian proxy is being decimated and humiliated on a daily basis and have drawn their own conclusions.
These can vary, but the overall impression must be that America can no longer deal with the whole world from a position of strength but is not psychologically ready to start dealing with it from a position of weakness; therefore, for the time being, it is not to be dealt with at all. India’s blanket refusal to stop buying oil from Russia was perhaps the final straw, signaling that it is time for Trump to stop trying to bully the world and to concentrate on his plentiful internal enemies instead.
But there is a bit of unfinished business that Trump is eager to attend to: the US still has a number of vassals: essentially, it is NATO/EU and the British Commonwealth. These can perhaps still be fleeced, having no ability to resist the US politically. In particular, the EU leaders have manipulated themselves into a wonderful political cul de sac with regard to the Ukraine: they cannot afford to admit that the Ukraine has been lost. And so Trump can force the hapless Europeans to continue feeding the Ukrainian black hole both through direct financial support of the Kiev regime and by buying weapons from the US and supplying them to the Ukrainians. Meanwhile, the US can turn its attention to its own neighborhood, which appears to be ready to burst into a civil war.
It is here that the term “War Department” takes on a rich new meaning as “Civil War Department”: the US has lost its ability to meaningfully project force abroad but it may perhaps still be able to hold the country together, split up as it is into implacably opposed groups of states.
[…]
Via https://boosty.to/cluborlov/posts/8776fe46-acb3-4835-9c31-4c6372fa0a0c
September 19, 2025
Glyphosate Found in Eggs, Chicken Sold in Grocery Stores Traced to GMO Poultry Feed
September 8, 2025A scientific review in World’s Poultry Science Journal highlights the adverse health effects on avian species from exposure to the widely used weedkiller glyphosate (Roundup) throughout the process of poultry production. The herbicide enters the poultry production system through residues in genetically engineered feed.
An earlier article in Scientific Reports concludes that glyphosate’s (GLP) “widespread application on feed crops leaves residues in the feed,” while residues are “found to be common in conventional eggs acquired from grocery stores.”
In analyzing the biochemical, toxicological and ecological impacts of glyphosate on poultry, particularly chickens, the authors find a wide body of evidence linking glyphosate and its metabolite (breakdown product) aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) to debilitating hazards that extend beyond mortality.
These sublethal effects include disruption of the gut microbiome and gastrointestinal disease; decreased productivity and diminished reproductive health; hepatic and kidney toxicity; growth and developmental impacts, including teratogenicity and embryotoxicity; endocrine disruption and oxidative stress; and impaired immune functions.
The effects of glyphosate, as have long been documented in the scientific literature and covered by Beyond Pesticides here, range from negative impacts on biodiversity and the environment to food safety risks and human health implications.
Residues of both glyphosate and AMPA “have been detected in soil, crops, animal feed, poultry, and water sources, prompting scrutiny of their long-term effects,” the authors state.
They continue:
“Studies indicate that glyphosate disrupts enzymatic pathways, particularly by inhibiting the cytochrome P450 system, leading to oxidative stress, endocrine disruption, and mitochondrial dysfunction.
“It has been linked to liver and kidney toxicity, gut microbiota alterations, reproductive harm, developmental defects, and possible carcinogenicity, though regulatory agencies remain divided on its classification as a carcinogen.”
The International Agency for Research on Cancer, a part of the World Health Organization, has classified glyphosate as having cancer-causing properties, as have independent peer-reviewed scientific studies. (See more here and here.)
The ubiquitous nature of glyphosate residues throughout the environment and within organisms is a result of the widespread application of this toxic chemical in forestry, agriculture, landscaping and gardening.
Over 750 herbicides contain glyphosate as the active ingredient, and it also plays a large role in the production of genetically modified (GM) crops, “with approximately 80% of GM crops bred specifically for GLP tolerance.”
Glyphosate-based herbicide formulations contain not only glyphosate but also other inert (undisclosed) ingredients, such as adjuvants that increase toxicity.
A common adjuvant in glyphosate-based herbicide products is polyethoxylated tallow amine (POEA), which researchers have found can kill human cells, particularly embryonic, placental and umbilical cord cells.
Effects on poultry
Glyphosate residues in animal feed, as well as in water and through other exposure routes, pose risks to both animal and human health, as these residues can bioaccumulate and biomagnify throughout the food chain.
With a high reliance on corn and soybeans in the diets of poultry, GM crops are a significant source of exposure for these animals.
“The presence of GLP residues in poultry feed raises concerns about potential health effects on birds, including disruptions in gut microbiota, oxidative stress, and overall productivity,” the authors write.
They continue:
“Globally, approximately 57% of maize grain and 85% of soybean production are directed towards animal feed. Several studies have investigated the effects of feeding glyphosate-tolerant GM crops to various livestock species.
“Research has included dairy cows, cattle, and chickens, highlighting the potential impact of glyphosate residues on poultry growth performance, immune function, and reproductive health.”
(See Daily News here and here with coverage of studies on contaminated meat.)
Hepatic and kidney toxicity
Studies show that the kidney and liver are among the first organs to be affected by alimentary poisoning/foodborne illness. Additional research shows glyphosate residues in food can then impact various systems in animals, including the liver, intestine, kidney, and lung, as well as alter enzyme activity. (See here and here.)
In a study of hatched chickens exposed to glyphosate alone and in Roundup shows “histopathological alterations in the kidneys and liver, along with imbalances in serum parameters and various biochemical changes in these organs, which could potentially impair their function.”
Oxidative stress
Exposure to glyphosate can induce oxidative stress and lipid, protein, and DNA damage. Previous research (see here, here and here) shows how glyphosate and AMPA are genotoxic and linked to oxidative damage.
One study shows that glyphosate increases the generation of reactive oxygen species in the liver and small intestine of chickens. Chronic exposure to products containing glyphosate in broiler breeders (stock chickens) weakens eggshells and delays embryo organ growth, with oxidative stress as the cause.
Gastrointestinal toxicity
Glyphosate diminishes the bioavailability of cytochrome (CYP) enzymes, which are crucial for metabolism, in the organs of chickens. One study shows that glyphosate specifically inhibits CYP P450 enzymes in chickens’ livers and small intestines.
Chicks exposed to glyphosate also have compromised liver function and altered lipid metabolism, further causing oxidative stress and deposits of fat in blood and liver tissues due to heightened expression of lipogenesis-related genes, as a result of its disruptive effect on cytochrome P450 enzymes.
Additional studies (see here, here and here) show disruption of the gut microbiome in livestock and poultry, where glyphosate reduces beneficial bacteria and enhances resistance in pathogenic strains.
These impacts can lead to the onset of chronic gastrointestinal diseases. In a study of the intestinal structure of chicks, glyphosate has been shown to impair the intestines, reduce antioxidant capacity, induce inflammation and cause the downregulation of genes in the small intestine.
Impact on reproduction
Previous research shows that chronic exposure to herbicides containing glyphosate can impact the survival, growth, activity and reproduction of organisms, including chickens. (See here, here and here.)
A study of roosters with chronic, subtoxic exposure to glyphosate shows reduced plasma testosterone and a decline in their reproductive peak.
Another study finds “significant effect on the histopathological [diseased tissue] characteristics of the rooster testes as well as sperm motility, the key determinant of rooster sperm quality.”
Additional research shows altered sperm in roosters when fed a diet containing glyphosate that leads to “metabolic disorders in the offspring, most likely due to epigenetic effects.”
Glyphosate implications for productivity and performance
Several studies have classified glyphosate-based herbicide formulations as teratogenic, causing developmental abnormalities in a fetus or embryo, and embryotoxic, causing harm or death to embryos during development.
In a study of quails, glyphosate was found to accumulate inside the eggs, causing damage to lipids (fats) in the brains of the developing embryos. This study also reveals that residues of glyphosate in food also slow plumage development and linger in eggs, muscles and livers of the birds.
Another study of chickens shows “exposure to GLP led to a significant reduction in the expression of key productivity-related genes.”
Exposure directly in the eggs of chickens to glyphosate-based herbicides induces teratogenic effects with negative effects on embryonic growth and development, as well as embryo mortality. (See research here.)
Changes in blood parameters, adverse effects on digestive tract development and reduced body weight are noted in chickens exposed to glyphosate.
Reproductive and developmental impacts regarding eggshell quality and embryo development are also associated with levels of both glyphosate and AMPA within egg yolk.
Yet another study shows that a decline in hatchability is associated with higher levels of glyphosate residues in feed among broiler breeders.
Regulatory deficiencies and the organic solution
Despite mounting scientific evidence that continues to link glyphosate to adverse effects in a wide range of species, current regulations fail to protect health and the environment.
The regulatory processes, such as those utilized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), also ignore factors that enhance the toxicity of these already harmful chemicals, such as synergy, mixtures and inert ingredients.
“Current safety evaluations mostly concentrate on glyphosate in isolation, overlooking the synergistic toxic effects of commercial formulations and their capacity for bioaccumulation in adipose tissues,” the authors point out.
They continue:
“Furthermore, the heightened toxicity of commercial glyphosate formulations, influenced by co-formulants such as POEA, in conjunction with glyphosate’s interference with gut microbiota, cytochrome P450 enzymes, and endocrine functions, emphasises the necessity for cumulative risk assessments and long-term studies that account for species variability, bioaccumulation, and synergistic effects.”
These inadequacies in the regulation of petrochemical pesticides and synthetic fertilizers support the urgent need for the widespread adoption of safer alternatives.
The holistic approach of organic agriculture and land management protects all organisms, including humans, and the environment through the elimination of harmful toxicants and the focus on building soil health.
This also mitigates the current crises of biodiversity, public health, and climate change, among other benefits.
Previous Daily News pieces showcase how organic meats are also safer for consumption. See “Conventional Meats Contaminated with Multi-Drug Resistant Bacteria, at Significantly Higher Rates than Organic Meats” and “Conversion to Organic Poultry Farming Lowers Risk of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria” for more information.
Additional research shows that organic poultry farming has both health and financial benefits.
Two studies reveal the potential for organic poultry farming to significantly reduce the risk to human health from food pathogens, as well as the cost to society of treating and eliminating those pathogens.
To learn more about how you can support the organic solution, see here and here.
[…]
Israel Finance Minister Smotrich Describes Gaza as a ‘real estate bonanza’
Trends in the News
Sept 18, 2025
Netanyahu never cared about the hostages, his critics say
MEARSHEIMER: ISRAEL WILL SACRIFICE HOSTAGES FOR A GREATER ISRAEL
Bezalel Smotrich, the Israeli finance minister and top “settler,” said at a conference that Gaza “is becoming a real estate bonanza” and there are already discussions in place with the U.S. about “how to divide the percentages of the land in Gaza.”
“The demolition phase is always the first phase of urban renewal,” he said, according to Haaretz. “We did that, now we need to start building.”
He said, “This plan was built by the most professional people there are. We are checking how this becomes a real estate bonanza—I’m not joking—and pays for itself.”Breaking the Silence, the Israeli veterans’ organization, posted in response:
The truth is out: Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich said Gaza is a real estate pearl, and that talks are underway with the U.S. on how to divide the land. This is why the assault on Gaza continues. Not Hamas, not hostages, not security – only messianic agendas and real estate.
The goals in Gaza have been clear, ever since Jared Kushner, Donald Trump’s son-in-law and member of the Friends of Israel Defense Forces national board, said in 2024: “Gaza’s waterfront property could be very valuable … if people would focus on building up livelihoods.”
“It’s a little bit of an unfortunate situation there, but from Israel’s perspective I would do my best to move the people out and then clean it up,” he said.
FOLLOW ON X: GERALD CELENTE | EDMUND DEMARCHE | TRENDS JOURNAL
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told a security cabinet meeting earlier this month that U.S. President Donald Trump encouraged him to go all out in Gaza and to avoid seeking “partial deals” with Hamas to receive some of the remaining 50 hostages—20 of whom are believed to be alive—still inside the enclave.
“Forget the partial deals. Go in with full force. Finish it,” Netanyahu said, quoting Trump, according to The Jerusalem Post.The Israeli military has been carrying out a new offensive in Gaza City and told hundreds of thousands of civilians there—many of whom have been displaced—to move south once again, which the UN called “incomprehensible.”
The Trump administration is comprised of only pro-Israel extremists, but his team represents a generation that is aging out of politics. Trump spoke to the Daily Caller and was asked about eroding support for Israel — even among Republicans in the U.S.
[…]
Via https://trendsinthenews.substack.com/p/truth-is-out-smotrich-says-israel
Pfizer, Moderna shares plunge on report Trump officials plan to link 25 child deaths to COVID vaccine
Shares in Pfizer and Moderna fell 3.9% and 7.4%, respectively, Friday after a report that the Trump administration plans to link the deaths of 25 children to COVID vaccines.
Trump health officials plan to include the claim in a presentation next week to a panel of advisors to the CDC that is considering new COVID vaccine recommendations, which can impact access to the shots and whether they’re free, according to the Washington Post.
Those deaths were seemingly gathered from information submitted to the government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, according to the report.
[…]
Moderna did not respond to The Post’s requests for comment.
The vaccine advisory panel’s meeting next week is crucial, as it will help determine whether insurers must pay for the vaccines, as well as whether pharmacies can administer them and doctors are willing to offer them at their practices.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. – who was recently grilled by senators from both parties at a tense hearing on vaccines – ousted every member of the vaccine panel earlier this year and replaced them with his own picks.
Health officials’ planned presentation for next week included attempts to interview some families, though it’s unclear what other information was used in preparation, according to the report.
In May, Kennedy ordered health officials to stop recommending the shots for healthy children, saying only people at high risk of complications from COVID or over age 65 need them.
The health agency also cancelled nearly $500 million in research funding on mRNA vaccines.
[…]
The Dark History of Hormone and Puberty Blockers
Story at a Glance:
•Puberty blockers used for transgender medicine belong to a class of drugs (GnRH agonists) which permanently block the production of sex hormones in the body. As hormones are essential for the body, GnRH agonists are amongst the most harmful drugs on the market.
•Originally approved (with grave reservations from the FDA) as a palliative treatment for severe prostate cancer, these drugs (e.g., Lupron) have rapidly proliferated into a wide range of areas in medicine, including routine prostate cancer, a myriad of female issues (e.g., endometriosis) and all sorts of experimental uses on children (e.g., making them taller).
•This proliferation was due to manufacturers pricing the drugs to generate enormous profits for themselves and doctors (in many cases constituting most of urology practices’ revenues)—likely why most urologists, when surveyed, admitted prescribing Lupron despite not believing it worked.
•These drugs rapidly age the body, causing permanent and crippling side effects, including severe bone loss, pain, soft tissue damage, severe pain hormonal disruption, sexual dysfunction, psychiatric issues, cognitive impairment, cancer risks, and cardiovascular and gastrointestinal disorders.
•Their use in transgender children to block puberty stems from an unproven theory that it ultimately leads to a more satisfying gender transition in adulthood. However, while aggressively advocating for them and publicly claiming these drugs are safe, effective, and reversible, in private, the group authoring the medical guidelines have admitted they have no idea what they are doing and know there are serious safety issues with the drugs.
•This article will expose the hidden truths about hormone blockers, the forgotten generations whose lives were ruined by them, and extensive documentation showing how dangerous these ‘safe and effective’ drugs are.
Transgenderism has rapidly become one of the most contentious political issues in our country and due to its rapid rise, a variety of theories have been put forward to explain where it emerged from. Remarkably, I almost never see what I believe to be one of the most important facets of the topic discussed—the immense dangers of hormonal blockers routinely used in this field or the appalling history of these drugs and how again and again, they’ve been thrust into new markets they had no place ever being used in because of how profitable they are.
As such, when laws are periodically passed banning their use in children (which has now happened in many Red States), I rarely see the actual dangers of these drugs discussed, and when I’ve spoken to left-wing colleagues (including pediatricians) opposing these laws about the topic, most are genuinely unaware the drugs have negative side effects. Because of this, I believe it is vital to expose the actual truth behind these drugs.
How Hormonal Blockers WorkThere are a variety of ways you can block the production of hormones in the body. Since the signal to produce sex hormones (e.g., estrogen and testosterone) begins in the brain, cutting that signal off mostly eliminates the body’s production of hormones. The most powerful hormonal blockers, the GnRH agonists, work by overstimulating the brain’s GnRH receptors so that they becomes “burned out” and no longer respond to the natural release of GnRH in the body, thereby short-circuiting the body’s production of sex hormones (which in many cases is a permanent short circuit).A variety of different GnRH over-activators are sold, such as Decapeptyl (Triptorelin), Lupron (Leuprorelin), Suprefact (Buserelin), Synarel (Nafarelin), Zoladex (Goserelin). Since Lupron is the most commonly used one, henceforth, I will only discuss it, but much of what I will say about Lupron also applies to the others as well.
Note: there are also numerous similar drugs which instead temporarily shut down hormone production by directly blocking the GnRH receptor (e.g., Orilissa). Additionally, there are other GnRH over-activators which are only used in animals and have similar side effects to those observed in humans.
Since testosterone fuels the growth of prostate cancer, there was a lot of research on cutting of the body’s testosterone to treat it. Initially the most promising approach was to counteract testosterone with an estrogen analog (DES) which was eventually pulled from the market because it caused a wide variety of issues (e.g., heart attacks, female cancers, and a variety of severe problems in the children of mothers who took DES—which has led many to argue the COVID-19 vaccines may become “the new DES”).
Since Lupron, by burning out GnRH receptors, chemically castrates males (and thereby eliminates their testosterone), a 1984 study was conducted comparing the use of DES to Lupron for patients with prostate cancer which had metastasized to the bones and was hence likely to be fatal. It found Lupron slightly increased their survival rate (although half still were dead within two years of starting the therapy) and it had a slightly different mix of severe symptoms when compared to DES, which in turn was used to argue it was a viable alternative to DES.
When the FDA reviewed this study, the reviewers noted the study had a variety of serious issues so it was difficult to draw any firm conclusions from it. As a result (despite the FDA knowing Lupron had real longterm risks that had not been investigated and other critical aspects of the drug like how the body metabolizes it remaining unknown to this day), Lupron was approved in 1985 as a “palliative treatment of advanced prostate cancer,” a situation which is frequently so debilitating and painful for cancer patients, anything which could potentially somewhat improve it is viewed as justified.
[…]
Since that time, Lupron’s approval was never updated. For those interested, a detailed explanation of why that approval was overtly fraudulent and unwarranted can be found here.
[…]
Once Lupron was approved, it use transitioned from only the most severe prostate cancers to all of them (even though, as shown by a 2009 study of 19,271 men, using Lupron actually increased the death rate). At the same time, a variety of other copycat drugs entered the market. The FDA in turn approved them (or Lupron) for advanced prostate cancer, advanced breast cancer, endometriois (along with its pretreatment prior to surgery), the pretreatment of fibroids before surgery, and preventing precocious (early) puberty.
[…]
Additionally, a variety of other off-label uses were concocted, such as:
•“Treating” every imaginable gynecological problem (e.g., large fibroids, difficult menstrual cycles, ovarian cysts).
•In-vitro-fertilization and egg donation protocols.
[…]
•Chemical castration for sex offenders (e.g., pedophiles).
•Helping children become taller (by delaying puberty so their growth plates take longer to close).
•Preventing puberty in a transgendered youth
[…]
In turn, there are three important things to take away from all of this.
1. While these drugs were initially developed for men (i.e., prostate cancer), they are frequently given off-label to women. This for example is why Lupron’s FDA insert states its only indication is for the palliative treatment of advanced prostate cancer but it simultaneously warns against pregnant women taking it (even though it’s also used for egg harvesting)
2. Despite having been on the market for decades, there is very little evidence to show these drugs actually benefit those who take them.
3. Given this, along with how incredibly toxic they are (especially to women), it raises a fairly simple question—why on earth are these drugs so popular?
[…]Selling LupronLupron’s manufacturer was stuck with a rather large challenge—how could they got doctors to begin prescribing an incredibly dangerous and ineffective drug? This in turn was accomplished through one of the most overt acts of physician bribery I’ve seen in American medicine.Since Lupron initially did not sell well, Lupron’s manufacturer took advantage of the existing “standard” which allows chemotherapy drugs to be sold for a very high price and be “forgiven” for their extreme toxicity. This was done by reformulating Lupron into a long acting monthly shot urologists could directly administer to their (prostate cancer) patients and hence directly profit from marking up when they resold it (e.g., Medicare paid 1200 dollars per shot—or roughly 2400 in today’s dollars, and in many cases urologists charged far more, all of which allowed many urologists to make hundreds of thousands of dollars per year administering the shots).
[…]
To further sweeten the deal, Lupron’s manufacturer frequently bribed urologists and gave them free Lupron samples they “resold.” This was illegal—and eventually resulted in a 875 million dollar fine…but no pharmaceutical executives going to prison.
Because Lupron was immensely profitable, more and more urologists jumped on it, and by the late 1990s Lupron treatments were costing almost a billion dollars per year and accounted for 40 percent of all Medicare payments to many urology practices in the late 1990s. To address this, in 2001, Medicare clamped down on urologists reselling discounted Lupron and in 2003 Medicare lowered the reimbursement for Lupron. In turn from 2003-2005, the rate of inappropriate use of hormonal treatment for prostate cancer dropped from 38.7% to 25.7% and many urologists at the time reported their income had been halved.
[…]
This Medicare crackdown on excessive Lupron prescribing for prostate cancer created a major problem for the industry. “Fortunately,” since Lupron was so profitable, many others specialities appeared eager to jump on the Lupron bandwagon, particularly OBGYNs (despite the existing data on using Lupron for gynecological conditions being very poor and in many cases overtly fraudulent). This in turn led to a rapid proliferation of new off-label “uses” for the drug, such as the ones listed above. Remarkably, despite the fact Lupron has been on the market for decades, it is still extremely expensive.
Lupron hence is a very lucrative drug. However it is unclear to me exactly what the current reimbursement is for it (e.g., when I’ve looked online, many patients said they were billed over 10,000 dollars for a single injection).
A recent article exploring the subject found that puberty blockers can cost tens of thousand dollars per year. While insurance typically covers these drugs around 72% of the time, without insurance, according to once source, they cost $4,000–$25,000 per year and according to another source a 3 month Lupron injection is $9500 while a competing 3 month option (histrelin) is $39,000.
Similarly, a 2022 NPR article detailing a man’s prostate cancer experience (where he was given unwarranted Lupron shots) reports he was charged $35,414 for the first shot and $38,398 for the second by a Chicago “non-profit” hospital, and after two years of haggling, was forced to pay the $7,000 not covered by his health insurance.
Let’s compare that to how much Lupron costs (this table designates the average wholesale price pharmacies pay for drugs):
[…]
Since all of this demonstrates that Lupron is marked up by 5-10 times its original cost when it is resold to patients, I would argue those who provide these medications may have an ulterior motive in giving them to patients which frequently causes the drugs to be inappropriately prescribed.
[…]
Via https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-dark-history-of-hormone-and-puberty
Israeli Filmmaker Searches for Stolen Palestinian Films
A Reel War: Israeli Filmmaker’s Search for Stolen Palestinian Films
Karnit Mandel (2025)
Film Review
In this intriguing film, Israeli filmmaker Karnit Mandel profiles her search for the Palestinian film archive stolen from the Beirut Palestine Research Center when Israel briefly occupied the city in 1982. The narrative is interspersed with snippets (accessed from other sources) of Palestinian families and children going about their lives. Even films from the early fifties portray daily life in Gaza as strikingly cosmopolitan with children healthy and well dressed.
Among the people she interviews are the former Palestinian archivist for the Beirut research, IDF and Israeli intelligence officials and two Israeli film archivists. Retired Israeli archivist Dr Yakov Loazovick believes Israel has an obligation to return the films or at least make them public – that a truly democratic state would only restrict classified information and only for a limited 70-year period.
The film also features footage from 1968 Operation Karameh, and Israeli attack on Karameh on the Jordan border. Faced with the combined force of the PLO and the Jordanian army, the IDF was pulverized, with 30 troops killed, 100 wounded and more missing in action. The Israeli government banned publishing the true outcome of the operation until 1984, instead they released a propaganda news reel (filmed in a totally different location). Mandel shows us excerpts of both.
Some of the most intriguing footage is from the thriving Palestinian export city of Jaffa in 1946, when the population (mainly Arab) was 123,000. Other footage shows unarmed Arabs surrendering at gunpoint to Haganah terrorists in 1948. One Israeli intellligence officer Mandel interviews asserts Palestinians were an insignificant minority in Palestine prior to Israel’s formation and left voluntarily.
After repeated calls and interviews with various Israeli officials, Mandel’s request to access the Palestinian archives to return them to the Palestinian Authority is denied – for the following reasons:
“The existence of a Palestinian film archive is an urban myth”
“It shouldn’t be returned because it’s all propaganda.”
“Palestine didn’t exist at that time. That concept was created later.”
“The film archive may have been destroyed.”
“It was returned to the Palestinians under the Oslo Accords” (a participant in the Oslo meetings asserts it was never discussed).
According to Mandel Palestinian cinema began in the 1930s
September 18, 2025
Were Donald Trump and Bill Clinton Blackmailed by Jeffrey Epstein Working for Israeli Intelligence?
Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump. [Source: au.news.yahoo.com]By Kathleen MeigsSeptember 17, 2025 Epstein’s network may have had a major hand in blocking peace initiatives in the Middle East—past and present [For an earlier examination of Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to intelligence agencies, see previous CAM article here.—Editors]
Ari Ben-Menashe is an Iranian-born former Israel Defense Forces intelligence operative.
In the 1980s, he was involved in the Iran-Contra scandal in which American hostages were released from Lebanon in exchange for Israeli weapons being sent to Iran.
From 1983 to 1985 the IDF intelligence director was Ehud Barak, who later became head of the IDF and then prime minister of Israel.
According to Ben-Menashe, the Iranian money was held for the Israeli government by publisher Robert Maxwell.
As part of his work with Maxwell, Ben-Menashe says he knew first-hand that Jeffrey Epstein was working for Robert in “financial services” and with Israeli intelligence.
Robert introduced Epstein to his daughter Ghislaine.
Speaking out is dangerous for Ben-Menashe. His Canadian home was bombed in 2012 after he defected from IDF intelligence.
Ben-Menashe said in mid August 2025: “In the 1990s [culminating in the Camp David summit in 2000] Bill Clinton and Ehud Barak, who was prime minister of Israel at the time, had a meeting in Washington with [PLO President Yasser] Arafat, and they did not sign the peace deal that was available because they were blackmailed by the Israeli Right. We could have had some sort of deal with the Palestinians going back to the ‘90s. But Ehud Barak and Clinton were being blackmailed by the Israeli Right [i.e., Benjamin Netanyahu and others].”[1]
[…]
Recall the portrait of Clinton in Epstein’s New York townhouse where Clinton is wearing Monica Lewinsky’s blue semen-stained dress. Monica Lewinsky was in a sexual relationship with the president at this time.
[Source: perthnow.com.au]Many in Washington knew about the on-going affair, and it would have been easy to tap her phone. Gordon Thomas (Gideon’s Spies, 1999) reported that Clinton was blackmailed through Netanyahu’s possession of tapes of sexual phone calls made between him and Lewinsky.
In April 1997 Netanyahu and Clinton met again. The next month, according to Lewinsky, Clinton broke up with her and proposed that they pretend they were trying to fool eavesdroppers if the tapes ever surfaced.
In fall 1998 Clinton hosted Netanyahu and Arafat for further peace talks. The Washington Post broke the Lewinsky sex story at this time. Was Monica another unwitting Queen Esther who saved Israel (i.e., Netanyahu)?
According to The New York Times, Netanyahu at the time asked Clinton to release Jonathan Pollard, referring to the Lewinsky tapes by saying he had thrown them away.[2]
Pollard was not released by Clinton nor was it the principal blackmail goal. Rather, the goal was to destroy the peace accord with Arafat. The 2000 Palestinian summit was indeed wrecked. Ben-Menashe says that Epstein had blackmail material on both Clinton and Barak, who made many visits to Epstein and who made a fortune in the U.S. in business after he left government.
The peace deal failed when Barak suddenly demanded that Arafat state that the PLO would make no such claims in the future, something to which the Palestinians could not possibly agree. Also, Clinton reneged on a promise to Assad to return the Golan Heights to Syria.[3]
Earlier, in 1995, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, who had reached a peace agreement with Arafat, the Oslo Accords, was assassinated by the Israeli Right, inflamed by Netanyahu.
Perhaps Rabin had stood up to blackmail attempts made by the Israeli Right. (The Right claimed Rabin was blackmailed by Washington into making concessions in the Oslo Accords.) Rabin rightly received the Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts. But the Accords failed after his assassination.
Last month, the usually reticent Ben-Menashe, gave a couple of interviews in which he pleaded with President Donald Trump to end the genocide of the Palestinians in Gaza.
Unlike the Ukraine War, Trump could actually stop the killing in Palestine in one day by withholding funding from Israel. But Netanyahu exerts extreme leverage over him.
Ben-Menashe urges President Trump to face whatever this hold is, no matter how dark and dangerous. If Trump, who has survived one assassination attempt, were brave enough to take this action, he could honestly merit the Nobel Peace Prize.
This month has also seen the publication of Andrew Lownie’s biography of Prince Andrew, Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York. In it he claims that the president’s future wife, Melania Knauss (nee Melanija Knavs in Yugoslavia), had sex with Epstein (a close associate of Prince Andrew as well as Trump) a year before she married Trump.[4]
That this assertion was subsequently excised in the audio and eBook versions of Lownie’s biography speaks volumes. Epstein and Trump biographer Michael Wolff, who has many hours of interview tapes with Epstein, claims that Epstein introduced Melania to Trump. If Trump was introduced to his present wife by Epstein, or even by associates of Epstein such his Trump Organization associate and Melania’s model agent, Paolo Zampolli, that would put an Israeli asset in the president’s marital bed.
[…]
Hunter Biden repeated Wolff’s assertion about how Trump met Melania on Access 5 news on August 6. Melania responded by threatening to sue Hunter Biden for defamation and demanded that the interview in which Hunter made that statement be removed. It is still up on YouTube as of August 20, 2025, as well as Hunter’s response in which he says he welcomes an official discussion of the matter.[5]
[…]
Michael Wolff in the Daily Beast claims that Trump met with Putin about ending the Ukraine War, as promised to his MAGA base, in order to distract from never-ending demands that he come clean on Epstein. By now, the media have established Jeffrey as an ever-greater villain than Vladimir Putin.
Is a Melania-Epstein connection a major blackmail element for Trump? Epstein, as part of an Israeli intelligence network headed by the Maxwell family, provided a variety of services to powerful men, not just the financial services noted by Ben-Menashe and others or the more publicized services involving underage girls.
Although outright financial blackmail might result from Epstein’s taping pedophilic acts, blackmail for political purposes can be brought to bear on powerful men in their relations with young adult women if they are tainted by being supplied by Epstein, especially if he was working for Israeli intelligence.
One of Epstein’s services was providing beautiful and accomplished young, but definitely over-the-age-of-consent, trophy wives for powerful older men. The problem here is that the wives, as assets of Israeli intelligence, have access to vast amounts of information that is easily transmitted to their handlers, whether they are consciously cooperating or not. They are also tainted by intimate friendship with the voracious pedophile.
One example of Epstein’s match-making is that of former Miss Sweden, Eva Andersson, who had a relationship with Epstein in the 1980s when she was modeling and attending medical school. Andersson later met and married Glenn Dubin, Jewish billionaire founder of Highbridge Capital Management.
The couple maintained a close relationship with Epstein. Dr. Andersson-Dubin has since founded the Dubin Breast Center of the Tisch Cancer Institute at Mount Sinai Medical Center.
The late Virginia Roberts Giuffre testified under oath that Ghislaine Maxwell instructed her to “have sex with Glenn Dubin,” including “erotic massages.” There is no proof that Epstein introduced Andersson to Dubin, but they clearly were all mutually involved.
A less well-known example of Epstein’s match-making is Melanie Starnes Walker, sometimes known as Starnes-Zuniga. When she first met Epstein and Trump in 1992, she was an attractive, sophisticated, and intelligent daughter of an upscale Mexican-American family in Laredo, Texas.
She had recently graduated from the University of Texas and was looking for summer work in New York. Epstein and Trump spied her dining at Trump’s New York Plaza Hotel. Epstein offered her a job as a lingerie model for Les Wexner’s Victoria’s Secret.
Walker apparently left her law student husband in Texas and moved to Manhattan. When Epstein discovered Walker’s brains and breeding, he encouraged her to attend medical school while grooming her as a suitable mate for a powerful man. He hired her as his “science adviser.” Epstein introduced Walker to Prince Andrew in New York in 1999.
Walker dined with the Prince and spent intimate time with him at Epstein’s Zorro Ranch in New Mexico. Walker was too brainy and too old for the Prince—he called “Dork” and “smarty pants” —but they remained close friends.
Walker proved, however, an ideal partner for what some considered the second-most-powerful man at Microsoft—Steven Sinofsky. In June 2000 she took him as her date to Andrew’s gala 40th birthday party at Windsor Castle, which Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell also attended.
In turn, Sinovsky introduced Walker to Bill Gates at a company barbecue. Walker moved to the Los Angeles area to pursue a medical residency in neurosurgery, which she completed in 2005. She then spent a year with the WHO in China. On her return, she moved in with Sinofsky in Seattle and got a job as a senior program officer with the Gates Foundation. The Gates Foundation subsequently set her up as a senior adviser for the World Bank. Sinofsky became president of Microsoft’s Windows Division in 2009.
At the Foundation, Walker befriended the organization’s science adviser, Harvard Professor Boris Nikolic, who traveled and socialized with Gates. She remained close to Epstein and introduced Nikolic to him. Nikolic, in turn, introduced Gates to Epstein. In 2011 Gates went to Epstein’s New York City townhouse and was joined by Eva Andersson-Dubin and her daughter.
Shortly thereafter, Melinda Gates began expressing concern about her husband’s connections to Epstein. Sinofsky was abruptly fired from Microsoft in November 2012. Walker left the Gates Foundation in 2013 and became a Young Global Leader of the World Economic Forum specializing in Neurotechnology and Brain Science. In 2019 the WEF held Event 201, which foresaw the Covid pandemic. Ironically, Walker subsequently founded and currently directs the University of Washington’s Clot Bank, which studies use of mitochondrial infusions to heal from stroke.
In a peculiar denouement, a few days before he “died,” Epstein designated Nikolic an executor of his will. Nikolic was shocked and declined the job. He claimed Epstein’s selection of him was “retaliatory” because those at the Foundation had realized for several years that Epstein’s philanthropy was to ingratiate himself with powerful others for his own purposes. Did he realize that Epstein worked for Israeli intelligence?
Israeli kompromat is not only for money but for major political favors, such as those previously given to Netanyahu by Barak and Clinton. Such a stranglehold comes from a combination of physical threat, sexual favors, bribes and blackmail.
Consider President Harry Truman. In 1947 he was sent a letter bomb by the Zionist Stern Gang, headed by Yitzhak Shamir, future prime minister of Israel. Truman’s letter was intercepted by security, unlike some others sent by the Stern Gang. Truman then pushed a Palestinian partition plan through the UN. His 1948 presidential campaign was funded by Zionist lobbyist Abe Feinberg. Truman made the U.S. the first state to defacto recognize Israel in 1948 when David Ben-Gurion announced its independence.
[…]A Proxy War with Israel Looms on Horizon for Turkey
By Huseyin VodinaliSeptember 17, 2025
Netanyahu has become a hot potato. He attacks anyone who stands in his way.
[…]
Israel commands, the US obeys. His attack on Qatar is clear proof of this. The attack, which completely destroyed Trump’s already crumbling credibility, was a complete trap.
Trump’s team summons Hamas leaders to a meeting, Israel receives information about the location and time (though it didn’t get it right; it only killed five insignificant people), and “Judas” countries like Jordan and Saudi Arabia open their airspace to Israeli aircraft. Even more tragically, the Israeli planes likely refueled with American tanker aircraft, departing from the Al Udeid base in Qatar.
This is one aspect of the situation, but the more important aspect is the geopolitical consequences of bombing a country like Qatar, a Rothschild satellite of the US. Qatar has paid a heavy price for its friendship with Zionism and must now look to new horizons.
If Qatar, already deeply unpopular in the Gulf Arab world, takes the risk, it could acquire the S-400 defense system from Russia to replace its outdated Patriot missile defense system. It could draw closer to the BRICS and the SCO.
This would cause the US to lose its closest non-NATO ally. In fact, Iran immediately intervened, along with Turkey, and sent a message of support to Qatar. Qatar is a small country, but it possesses some of the world’s richest natural gas reserves. The most important point here is that the attack on Qatar also carries a threatening message directed at Turkey.
The Turkish Armed Forces, which have been based in Qatar since 2015, provide training and consulting services to the Qatari army at the base, which was renamed the Qatari-Turkish Combined Joint Force Command in 2017.
The cooperation expanded further in 2024 with the addition of air and naval units. According to a statement from the Ministry of National Defense, Turkey has deployed six F-16 fighter jets and two patrol ships to Qatar.
In other words, Qatar is practically the next stop before Turkey.
Media outlets in Israel have been talking about war with Turkey for some time now. The situation in Syria reveals its reality and its underlying foundation. Israel, of course, cannot openly engage in war with Turkey, but it will do everything in its power. May be Israel planning a new war on Cyprus. USA-Greece-Greek Cypriots on its side.
Also It could start a proxy war in Syria using the YPG Kurdish forces. As a terrorist and genocidal state, it could easily deploy its proxies in Turkey, such as ISIS and the PKK. This is exactly what I’m waiting for. ISIS sent its first message from Izmir. A 16-year-old psychopathic child raided a police station and killed two police officers. The PKK, on the other hand, is waiting for the negotiations to be overturned in the second peace process. They have made their preparations, armed themselves, and improved their skills in drone warfare.
Erdoğan’s coalition partner Devlet Bahçeli’s statement the other day strengthens the possibility that Turkey and Israel will soon fight in Syria.
The MHP leader said they cannot allow the YPG/SDF to “remain a security problem for Turkey.” US “Colonial Governor” Tom Barrack, however, rebuked Bahçeli, stating that the YPG are their allies and will have an autonomous structure in Syria.
Erdoğan has likely devised a political game plan, saying “if there is no peace, there will be war.”
Developments such as the continuous and rapid armament and the construction of shelters in 81 provinces indicate that we may soon enter a serious war. In such a situation, he believes the declaration of martial law (as if it doesn’t already exist) and the closure of the Y-CHP will be a tactic.
Israel, however, relies not only on the PKK and ISIS but also on the Greek Cypriot side. The news coming from the Greek Cypriot side are significant. It reported that Israel’s Barak MX air defense systems had been transferred from the port of Limassol. British bases in the Greek Cypriot side are already hosting Israel, and British spy planes are providing intelligence, along with the US, on Netanyahu’s genocide.
Netanyahu is deeply convinced that they will establish Erez Israel, or Greater Israel. This includes a Kurdistan established in Syria and Iraq, whose borders also encroach on Turkey and Iran. Bibi dreams of establishing a new hegemony in the Middle East with a Greater Israel and a Greater Kurdistan between the Euphrates and the Nile. That’s why he “managed” to attack six countries simultaneously in the last 10 days! The rest will surely follow.
Türkiye, on the other hand, seems to continue to seek help from its enemies (the US and the EU) and ignore its potential allies (Iran, for example). This will only make things worse, which are already going bad.
[…]
Via https://www.globalresearch.ca/proxy-war-israel-looms/5900559
The Most Revolutionary Act
- Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's profile
- 11 followers
