Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 70
May 20, 2025
FDA Plans to Require Clinical Trials Before Approving Annual COVID Vax Boosters for Healthy People
By Natalia Mittelstadt
The release of updated COVID vaccines for healthy children and adults this fall will likely be delayed.
Food and Drug Administration plans to require new clinical trials before approving annual COVID-19 vaccine boosters for healthy Americans under 65 years old.
The plan appears in a paper published Tuesday in the New England Journal of Medicine, in which FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and Dr. Vinay Prasad, the FDA’s vaccine chief, wrote any new COVID shot must undergo placebo-controlled clinical trials, NBC News reported.
This means that the release of updated COVID vaccines for healthy children and adults this fall will likely be delayed.
While the original COVID shots underwent placebo-controlled trials, the updated boosters only went through smaller studies.
Makary and Prasad wrote that the COVID shot policy “has sometimes been justified by arguing that the American people are not sophisticated enough to understand age- and risk-based recommendations.”
“We reject this view,” they added.
[…]
Via
Emmanuel Macron Issues Joint Statement From France, The United Kingdom And Canada Demanding Immediate Palestinian Two State Solution In Gaza
By Geoffrey Grider
Emmanuel Macron issues joint statement between France, United Kingdom and Canada calling for the immediate implementation of Two State Solution in Gaza
If you listened to our Podcast today, then you know that everyone is doing what they’re supposed to be doing regarding the end times. Pope Leo XIV is busy creating a Revived Roman Empire, Donald Trump is helping to create a United States of Islam in the Middle East, and Emmanuel Macron is busy doing what the MOS is supposed to do, create a Palestinian state in Gaza on God’s land. Macron issued a stunning statement today, and you can read it in its entirety below. That’s the memo.
[…]
Not only is Emmanuel Macron going to nearly single-handedly bring in a Palestinian State, the help he has enlisted is also quite noteworthy. President Donald Trump, fresh off his $2.3 trillion dollar bonanza in the Middle East has already promised clandestine support for the Two State Solution. Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, a huge advocate for a Palestinian State is going to co-chair this event with Macron at the UN in June. Since 2017, NTEB has been calling for Emmanuel Macron to be revealed as the biblical man of sin, and mark your calendars, this June he just may do it. And here’s a fun fact: the UN Two State Conference takes place on the last four days of Spring…TO THE FLIGHT!!!
Emmanuel Macron release joint statement by the leaders of France, the United Kingdom and Canada on the situation in Gaza and the West Bank
This is the official Joint Statement taken directly from the Elysee site in Paris.
FROM THE ELYSEE: We strongly oppose the expansion of Israeli military operations in Gaza. The level of human suffering in Gaza is intolerable. Israel’s announcement yesterday to allow a minimal amount of food into the Gaza Strip is completely insufficient. We call on the Israeli government to halt its military operations in Gaza and immediately allow humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip. This must include engagement with the United Nations to ensure the resumption of aid deliveries in accordance with humanitarian law. We call on Hamas to immediately release the remaining hostages it has so cruelly held since October 7, 2023.
The Israeli government’s refusal to provide essential humanitarian assistance to the civilian population is unacceptable and risks violating international humanitarian law. We condemn the abhorrent language recently used by members of the Israeli government and the threat of forced displacement of civilians facing the desperate destruction in Gaza. Permanent forced displacement is a violation of international humanitarian law. Israel suffered a horrific attack on October 7. We have always supported Israel’s right to defend its people against terrorism. But this escalation is completely disproportionate.
We will not stand idly by while the Netanyahu government continues these outrageous actions. If Israel does not halt the new military offensive and lift its restrictions on humanitarian aid, we will take further concrete steps in response.
We oppose any attempt to expand settlements in the West Bank. Israel must end settlements, which are illegal and undermine the viability of a Palestinian state and the security of Israelis and Palestinians. We will not hesitate to take further action, including targeted sanctions.
We strongly support the efforts of the United States, Qatar, and Egypt to secure an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. Only a ceasefire, the release of all remaining hostages, and a long-term political solution offer the best hope of ending the agony of the hostages and their families, alleviating the suffering of civilians in Gaza, ending Hamas’s control over Gaza, and paving the way for a two-state solution, in line with the objectives of the June 18 conference in New York, co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France. These negotiations must succeed, and we must all work toward implementing a two-state solution, as the only way to bring about the lasting peace and security that Israelis and Palestinians deserve and ensure long-term stability in the region.
We will continue to work with the Palestinian Authority, regional partners, Israel, and the United States to reach consensus on arrangements for the future of Gaza, building on the Arab plan. We affirm the important role of the high-level conference on the two-state solution to be held at the United Nations in June in building international consensus around this goal. We are committed to recognizing a Palestinian state as a contribution to achieving a two-state solution and stand ready to work with others to this end.
[…]
US. Economy experiencing ‘Death By a Thousand Cuts’, says Deutsche Bank, as Confidence in National Debt Management Erodes
By Eleanor Pringle
America’s soaring national debt, now over $36.2 trillion, has triggered concern among economists and credit agencies like Moody’s, which recently downgraded the U.S. credit rating amid fears that economic growth won’t keep pace with rising debt and interest payments.
Economists have criticized politicians’ plans to reduce America’s national debt as too little, too late. But analysts are warning that the issue is now coming home to roost, with the once unshakeable confidence in the United States’ fiscal future beginning to erode.
America’s national debt, which currently stands at more than $36.2 trillion, is increasingly rising on economists’ agendas. Their fear is that as the nation’s debt burden increases, alongside the interest payments to service the debt, the economy will not grow fast enough to sustain the spending.
Such fears were reflected in a Moody’s downgrade of U.S. credit last week from Aaa to Aa1. Moody’s justified: “While we recognize the US’ significant economic and financial strengths, we believe these no longer fully counterbalance the decline in fiscal metrics.”
The downgrade is yet another thorn in the side of America’s fiscal health, despite protestations from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that the market should take little heed of Moody’s news.
As Deutsche Bank’s Jim Reid put it in a note seen by Fortune this morning: “Yesterday felt like we were somewhere along the line of a ‘death by a thousand cuts’ with regards to the U.S. fiscal situation. Hard to know where in that thousand we are but probably much nearer a thousand than at zero even as yesterday saw an initial sell-off reverse as the session went on.
“At the end of the day the loss of the final U.S. triple-A rating late on Friday night doesn’t change anything much immediately but it keeps the drip, drip, drip of poor fiscal news building up against the debt sustainability dam in the background.”
President Trump and his cabinet are not blind to the national debt issue. Trump has suggested it could be paid off with the funds from his ‘gold card’ visa scheme, while the overriding message from DOGE (the Department of Government Efficiency) has been efficiency and cost-cutting.
But Trump is maintaining a delicate balance in the deliverables his campaign promises: cutting costs and reducing taxes, which, in turn, reduces the revenues needed to rebalance government spending.
The Trump cabinet is currently encouraging Congress to pass this “big, beautiful bill” of tax cuts. Some of this includes an expansion of the 2017 tax cuts, which are due to expire at the end of 2025, with notable additions such as axes to taxes on tips and overtime pay.
The Trump administration argues that the bill will actually help rebalance the debt-to-GDP ratio. Administrations have two choices to bring the balances into order: reduce the debt or increase GDP.
They say extending the tax cuts will do the latter, arguing their bill will raise short-run real GDP by 3.3 to 3.8% and long-run real GDP by 2.6 to 3.2%.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) disagrees. In an April report, the nonpartisan analyst organization stated that if provisions of the 2017 tax act were extended, thus lowering tax revenues, and with no other changes made to fiscal policy, public debt would reach 220% of GDP by 2025.
This would be 63 points higher than long-term baseline projections without the cuts.
Banking on the Fed
In the event of U.S. debt buyers losing confidence in the country’s ability to repay, America does have a card it can play in the form of the Fed.
The central bank could employ quantitative easing, a move that would likely raise eyebrows, to lower longer-term interest rates and make it easier for the government to continue borrowing.
While the bond market reacted fairly minimally to Moody’s downgrade, UBS adds that should volatility increase at some point, the Fed would likely act.
In a note sent to Fortune today, UBS’s chief investment officer Mark Haefele wrote: “Overall, we view this latest credit action as a headline risk rather than a fundamental shift for markets. We would also expect the Federal Reserve to step in if there were a disorderly or unsustainable increase in bond yields.
“So while the downgrade may lean against some of the recent ‘good news’ momentum, we do not expect it to have a major direct impact on financial markets.”
[…]
Via https://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-economy-experiencing-death-thousand-104325496.html
UK Summons Free Trade Talks with Israel, Summons Regime’s Ambassador

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy debates at the Parliament over the issue of suspending the trade agreement with Israel, May 20, 2025. (social media)
Press TV
The UK has suspended free trade negotiations with Israel, summoned its ambassador, and announced further sanctions against West Bank settlers after Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he was horrified by Israel’s escalation of the war in Gaza.
UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy told members of Parliament on Tuesday that the “threat of starvation is hanging over hundreds of thousands of civilians.”
He said the UK government will not ignore the “abominable” situation in Gaza and it will take steps to dissuade the Israeli regime from further escalating the war.
“Frankly, it is an affront to the values of the British people. Therefore, today, I am announcing that we have suspended negotiations with this Israeli [regime] on a new free trade agreement.”
Lammy added that war is not the way to free the remaining captives, and called on Israel to end the blockade of humanitarian aid.
The UK Minister for West Asia, Hamish Falconer, also said, “Today I will set out to Ambassador Tzipi Hotovely the government’s opposition to the wholly disproportionate escalation of military activity in Gaza and emphasize that the 11-week block on aid to Gaza has been cruel and indefensible.”
Israel must follow its obligations under International Humanitarian Law and confirm “full, rapid, safe and unhindered” provision of humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza, Falconer added.
The Israeli military announced last week that it will intensify its attacks on Gaza.
Since May 16, it has conducted a wave of massive aerial assaults and deployed additional troops to the Palestinian territory.
On Monday, in a joint statement, Canada, France, and the UK condemned the expansion of Israel’s war on Gaza and called on the regime to lift the restrictions on humanitarian aid entering the enclave.
The UK has also imposed sanctions on several groups and individuals in the occupied West Bank who have been linked to acts of violence against Palestinians.
In response to the UK’s decision to halt the free trade agreement, Oren Marmorstein, a spokesperson for the Israeli ministry of foreign affairs, wrote on his X account, “Even prior to today’s announcement, the free trade agreement negotiations were not being advanced at all by the current UK government … The British Mandate ended exactly 77 years ago. External pressure will not divert Israel from its path.”
Since October 7, when the Israeli regime began its genocidal war against the people of Gaza, it has killed more than 53,000 Palestinians and injured more than 120,000 others, most of whom are children and women.
[…]
Via https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2025/05/20/748311/uk-suspends-trade-negotiations-with-israel
May 19, 2025
NIghtmare of Jerusalem Part V – The Heavy Hand of the CIA, Mossad and MI6 in Post World War II Iran
Nightmare of Jerusalem Part V
Press TV (2025)
Film Review
Part V reveals how CIA, Mossad and MI6 interference engineered the isolation of Iran, an open opponent of the 1948 UN partition of Palestine, from other Arab countries.
Recognition of Israel
In 1948, the Shah (Mohammad Reza Pahlavi) compelled the Iranian envoy to the UN to vote against the partition of Palestine (creating the State of Israel). President Truman invited the Shah to the White House and rewarded him with a a $400,000 bribe to officially recognize Israel.
Savak, the Shah’s secret police, was infiltrated and trained by the Mossad, which assassinated 17,000 Iranian dissidents between 1over 20 years. The Mossad also spied on the Sha, all the government ministers and elected members of the Iranian Consultative Assembly (ICA).
In 1951, a rift with the Shah caused the closure of the Iranian consulate in Jerusalem and Iran’s refusal to accept the Israeli envoy. The same year, extreme political and economic instability led the ICA to elect three prime ministers in 51 days, following the assassination of Ali Razara in March 1951. The ICA elected Mohammad Mossadegh prime minister on April 28, 1951. He served one year and eighty days. A CIA/MI6 coup removed him from power in 1953 after he nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company.
Following the 1979 Iranian revolution, the Islamic Republic shut down Israel’s El Al airlines in Iran and asked Israel to recall their planes. It then totally severed relations with Israel.
CIA and Mossad Organize Kurdish Separatist Groups
In the late seventies the CIA and Israeli intelligence begun fomenting and funding Kurdish separatist groups to 1) thwart ongoing attempts to build a unified Arab movement and 2) if possible overthrow Iran’s Islamic Republic. Although they continued to arm Kurdish rebels in Iran, Iraq and Turkey, they also backed Iraq’s attack on Kurdistan.
Iran-Iraq War
Iran and Iraq have a long history of border issues. On May 6, 1975 both regimes announced they had resolved their border issues, although property owners affected by the new boundary opposed the settlement.
After a blast in Beirut killed 300 US/French troops, the US blamed Iran (although Palestine’s Islamic Jihad claimed responsibility) and increased military aid for Iraq. In May 1982, Iran pushed their border war into Iraq. After Iran used floating bridges in 1984 in the Battle of the Marshes, Iran seized the upper hand in Southern Iraq. At this point, Saddam Hussein began using chemical weapons they received from the US, UK, France, Germany and the Netherlands. This shifted the military balance in Iraq’s favor.
May 18, 2025
Why No Justice for Shot Victims?
By Bert Oliver
I have previously wondered whether the recent (and continuing) revelations about the Covid injections’ death toll would bring any justice. Given the rapidly increasing number of studies and reports concerning the rising death toll that may arguably be causally linked to the so-called Covid ‘vaccines,’ one can therefore quite reasonably ask: why has there still been no concrete attempt to prosecute the pharmaceutical companies and individuals who were directly involved with the manufacture and promotion of these potentially (and in millions of cases actually) lethal shots?
In light of these studies, it is hardly surprising that many people are raising critical questions about the perceptible consequences of the jabs. Just today, I read an article titled ‘Government Admits it Knew Covid Vax Shots were Fraud – President Trump, Pull Them Off the Market! – Karen Kingston.’
[…]
The cat is out of the bag as far as the US government’s tacit, unacknowledged awareness of the dangers attached to the Covid ‘vaccines’ is concerned. In light of the confirmation of these dangers in numerous studies, in retrospect, the reports of mortality rates and other indications of injury would appear to provide further confirmation – all that should be needed to prosecute those responsible, such as Bill Gates, on whom I have written here before. Dr Joseph Sansone reports as follows on one of these studies:
The mRNA nanoparticle injections are associated with neurological disorders, autoimmune diseases, heart problems, strokes, cancers, metabolic disorders, and a host of other diseases and disorders, including death. One need not be a scientist or medical doctor to figure out that by giving people chronic diseases and illnesses, that you are shortening their life spans. A recent study was published showing a shocking 37% decrease in life span after COVID injections. If this data is extrapolated out over the course of a life span that would mean an approximate 29 year reduction in life span.
Needless to point out, this information is nowhere to be found in the mainstream media, which does not seem to matter any longer, given the plethora of alternative news and discussion sites available to people doing their own research, as long as one remembers to cross-check information, to the fullest possible extent, before accepting its accuracy.
The studies in question are, in most cases I have investigated, published in reputable journals, such as this one, which appeared in Springer’s Discover Medicine journal. In the author’s discussion of ‘problems associated with mRNA vaccines,’ one reads:
In Japan, a 26-year-old healthcare worker reportedly died of a brain hemorrhage 4 days after receiving a single dose of the mRNA vaccine early in the vaccination campaign. This case was potentially linked to vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Despite this, the vaccination program continued, becoming nearly mandatory.
The publication of an article on the adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines in the Virology Journal marked a turning point, halting further vaccinations worldwide after June 2022. This is because, for the first time, in the peer-reviewed article, the cause of the immunodeficiency was clearly presented, a request was made to discontinue the booster mRNA vaccination, and the information was spread worldwide through social networking sites and other means. Although a new type of mRNA vaccine was approved afterward, Japan remains the only country actively vaccinating its population. [This claim is questionable, in my view. B.O.] Despite the declining number of vaccinators, the routine administration of the eighth coronavirus vaccine dose for older adults began in October 2024.
It beggars the imagination that in a country where the population seems to have been wide awake regarding the dangers of these jabs, the authorities have forged ahead with their ‘vaccination’ programme regardless. In this video, for example, we are informed that Japanese scientists have raised the alarm about signs that Covid ‘vaccines’ are ‘causing a global population collapse.’ In addition to this, a new Japanese cancer study has disclosed the links between the Covid vax and cancer. In a summary of the video discussion of this alarming evidence, it is stated that:
Kevin McKernan discusses new Japanese research revealing alarming cancer mortality patterns following mRNA vaccination. The study shows how vaccine-induced cancer profiles completely shifted, with tumors appearing where lipid nanoparticles accumulate. McKernan analyzes pharmaceutical corruption, regulatory capture, and the Bradford Hill criteria supporting causation. The conversation explores RFK Jr.’s HHS appointment, treatment alternatives including cannabinoids and psilocybin, problematic hemp regulation, SSRI dangers, and self-amplifying vaccine risks. McKernan details how excess mortality post-vaccination in Japan now surpasses their 2011 tsunami death toll.
Small wonder that Japan has launched an ‘official investigation into the unprecedented numbers (said to run into millions) of people dying after receiving the Covid-19 vaccination.’ It is puzzling that a country where such a consequential step can be taken, can at the same time (as stated in the Springer study referenced earlier) continue unabated with its mRNA ‘vaccination’ programme, despite the most senior oncologist in the country referring to the mRNA ‘vaccinations’ as ‘evil practices.’ In 2024 already, Japanese research connected no fewer than 201 diseases with the Covid injections. Add to this that the Pfizer mRNA ‘vaccine’ has no fewer than 1,291 adverse side-effects (which Pfizer was forced to publish in 2022 as clinical data), and already it would appear that one can start heading to court.
As may be seen from the examples listed above, once one starts looking for studies pertaining to emerging evidence about the consequences of the Covid shots on the part of recipients, one’s research uncovers numerous relevant instances, such as this recent one on cancer-causing DNA fragments in mRNA ‘vaccines:’
A major investigation by a group of renowned German researchers has confirmed that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccines” are laced with dangerous levels of DNA contaminants.
While the presence of DNA contamination in Covid injections is not a new discovery, this latest study uses advanced techniques for more reliable quantification, making it the most significant investigation to date.
As Slay News has previously reported, leading scientists have been warning for some time that surges in deadly cancers among the Covid-vaccinated were caused by DNA fragments in the mRNA injections.
The study was led by Jürgen O. Kirchner, an Independent Researcher in Hamburg, and Professor Brigitte König of the University of Leipzig.
The results of the study were published in the Preprints journal.
The researchers hypothesized that residual DNA contaminants in multiple batches of Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccine” significantly exceed regulatory safety thresholds.
This finding is not to be sneezed at, given the indications that ‘turbo cancer’ is exploding among the vaxxed, as the following two reports emphasise – one of them particularly pointing to its rise among young people. The other video discussion between Dr Peter McCullough and Dr Drew Pinsky focuses on a specific study concerning such evidence of turbo cancer manifesting itself among those who have been ‘vaccinated.’ The discussion is summarised as follows below the video:
In a medical paper coauthored by Dr. Peter McCullough, researchers reported evidence of “turbo cancer” – an “aggressive, infiltrating, metastatic, and ultimately lethal basaloid type of carcinoma” appearing soon after mRNA vaccination for COVID-19…The world-renowned heart health expert says the mRNA shots “should be off the market completely.”
“We have a lot of information suggesting these are no good for the heart…” Dr. McCullough told Real America’s Voice. “Now we have data…of the heart change in almost everybody who took the shot, at least for six months or longer…”
Dr. Peter McCullough is an internist, cardiologist, epidemiologist, and the Chief Scientific Officer of The Wellness Company. As an expert on cardiovascular medicine with over 30 years of experience, Dr. McCullough has spoken widely about the heart-related risks that he believes could be attributed to mRNA technology.
One could go on and list many more such reports on studies, but I think my point has been made and therefore I shall list only one more, by Rhoda Wilson of that intrepid investigative British newspaper, The Exposé, where she writes:
Multiple doctors and scientists, including Dr. David Rasnick, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Roger Hodkinson, and Scientist Kevin McKernan, say that covid injections cause “turbo cancers” due to immune system suppression.
The injections contain DNA plasmids with the SV40 promoter sequence, which has been associated with oncogenesis and can bind with P53, “the guardian of the genome.”
Doctors and experts report a significant increase in aggressive cancers, often in younger people, with rapid growth to Stage 3 or Stage 4, and link this phenomenon to the covid injections’ degradation of the immune system.
Multiple case reports and studies suggest a potential link between covid injections and an increased risk of cancer, including aggressive and metastatic types. Specific cases reported include colon cancer, breast cancer, skin cancer, gastric cancer, basaloid carcinoma, melanoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma, among others. Researchers propose that the vaccines may cause immune suppression, leading to accelerated cancer progression and that certain modifications in mRNA vaccines (e.g., 100% N1-methyl-pseudouridine) enhance tumour growth.
Hence, given that these reports are known to a lot of people, which must surely include representatives of governments around the world, to reiterate: why have no prosecutions of those responsible for the deaths resulting from the clot-shot been initiated? I should add ‘yet,’ but given the inexplicable inaction regarding this elephant in the room, one is tempted to speculate that some organisation(s) lurking in the shadows may have a hold over those who are in positions where they can proceed with prosecutions. Call it a conspiracy theory, if you like, but what else could be the explanation?
To be sure, there have been ‘official inquiries,’ such as the one referred to in this report, but nothing has been forthcoming, which is indicative of suppression of potentially damning information. Interestingly, when confronted with this silence, a ‘people’s vaccine inquiry’ was launched:
On the first day of the long-awaited Module 4 of the UK Covid Inquiry, it became clear that the Inquiry was going to do everything it could to bury evidence that does not suit the narrative of “vaccines are safe and effective” and continue to gaslight the many who have been vaccine injured.
In response, a group of experts held a press conference to set the record straight. In their press conference, the group, called The People’s Vaccine Inquiry, lays bare the theatre that is known as the UK Covid Inquiry Vaccines and therapeutics (Module 4). […you can find all the videos and transcripts from the press conference on the People’s Vaccine Inquiry website HERE.]
Is it too much to insist on justice being seen to be done as far as the perpetrators are concerned? I don’t think so. A few years ago, I published a paper on ‘How (most) philosophers have failed humanity’ (which, amazingly, after peer review, was accepted) in an academic journal (Phronimon). In it, I drew on the historical example of Socrates, to illustrate my claim, that it is one of the characteristic traits of a true philosopher to have a keen sense of justice, as displayed by Socrates in his famous trial in Athens.
Which does not preclude non-philosophers from displaying such a sense of justice, of course, but it does disqualify a great many individuals who work as professional philosophers, from passing the test of authenticity. In South Africa, where I live, most professional philosophers have failed this test dismally as far as their response to the tyrannical Covid measures and the aftermath of the Covid ‘vaccines’ being administered are concerned.
I have a strong feeling that, unless large numbers of citizens start coming forward and insisting on justice being done in light of the burgeoning numbers of studies and reports demonstrating beyond any reasonable doubt that the very composition of these so-called ‘vaccines’ testify to them as dangerous, this whole lamentable episode will just be swept under the carpet. The obvious person to take the requisite action is Robert F. Kennedy (Jr), of course, in his capacity as America’s Health Secretary. Perhaps he will still do so, pending the accumulating evidence of malfeasance, as well as pressure from concerned citizens, reaching ‘critical mass.’
[…]
Via https://brownstone.org/articles/why-no-justice-for-shot-victims/
US to Begin European Troop Withdrawal Talks
US NATO Ambassador Matthew Whitaker via Free Malaysia Today
By Robert Semonsen
In a move signaling a long-overdue shift in American foreign policy, the United States, under President Donald J. Trump, is preparing to open discussions with European allies on reducing its military footprint across the continent.
US Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker confirmed the Trump administration’s plans during a security forum in Estonia, stating that the conversations will formally begin after June’s NATO summit in The Hague, Reuters reported.
“Nothing has been determined,” Whitaker said, “but as soon as we do, we are going to have these conversations in the structure of NATO.” He made it clear this isn’t just another round of diplomatic foot-dragging. “It’s more than 30 years of the US desire to reduce troops in Europe. President Trump just said, enough—this is going to happen, and it’s going to happen now.”
The remarks starkly contrast with previous administrations’ foreign policy, which treated NATO like a sacred cow regardless of how little European members contributed in return. Trump-era officials have increasingly called out what they see as chronic European underfunding and dependency.
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth minced no words earlier this year, declaring that “stark strategic realities prevent the United States of America from being primarily focused on the security of Europe.”
In private discussions over the allegedly encrypted messaging app Signal, Hegseth reportedly expressed his “loathing of European free-loading,” a sentiment echoed by Vice President J.D. Vance. The two have become key voices pushing to restore a foreign policy rooted in American interests, not global entanglements.
Despite the uproar in some NATO capitals, Whitaker reassured allies that the US isn’t abandoning the alliance altogether—just recalibrating its role. “We’re going to remain in this alliance,” he said. “But we’re not going to have any more patience for foot-dragging.”
The numbers behind the move are substantial. America currently maintains an estimated 128,000 troops across Europe, with Germany hosting the lion’s share. Poland, Italy, and the UK also house significant contingents.
But the political winds are shifting, and rightly so. Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk recently tried to tamp down fears after the US quietly redeployed forces away from a major Ukrainian support hub. Still, the writing’s on the wall.
For decades, Washington has carried the bulk of the military burden in Europe, funding and defending nations that often lecture Americans while failing to meet even basic NATO spending obligations. With ballooning domestic priorities and a border crisis back home, many Americans—especially those aligned with the nationalist, Trump-aligned right—are asking why their sons and daughters are still stationed abroad to defend countries that won’t defend themselves.
[…]
Via https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/05/us-begin-european-troop-withdrawal-talks-nato-ambassador/
FDA Just Approved Another COVID Vaccine — But RFK Jr. Has Already Intervened
By Ben Kew
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Friday approved the Novavax COVID-19 vaccine, but RFK Jr. is stepping in to limit its availability.
The latest Novavax vaccine will only be avalaible to the elderly and those over the age of 12 with an underlying medical condition.
The approval of the vaccine, named Nuvaxovid, is contingent on the company conducting studies to assess potential links to various heart conditions.
However, Some of these investigations can be carried out using existing data sources.
The New York Times has more details:
Scientific advisers to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who typically make decisions on who should get approved shots and when, have been debating whether to recommend Covid shots only to the most vulnerable Americans.
The F.D.A.’s decision appeared to render at least part of their discussion moot.
The vaccine had previously been authorized under emergency use. Covid vaccines developed by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, which are more widely used by Americans, were granted full approval in 2022. However, the companies are working on updated shots for the fall, and the new restrictions on the Novavax shot portend a more restrictive approach from the F.D.A.
The F.D.A.’s new restrictions also appeared to reflect the high degree of skepticism about vaccines from Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the health secretary, and the other leaders he has appointed at health agencies.
The jab is said to have fewer side effects than mRNA based vaccines because it is built on a more traditional vaccine platform.
Figures in the scientific establishment are already complaining about the restrictrions.
”This is incredibly disappointing,”said Dr. Camille Kotton, an infectious disease physician at Massachusetts General Hospital and former adviser to the C.D.C. “I don’t know why they would make this restriction; I don’t know of any indication to make this change,” she continued. “This is a dark day in American medicine.”
[…]
Via https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/05/fda-just-approved-another-covid-vaccine-rfk-jr/
Arab Summit reaffirms centrality of Palestine, joint Arab action
At the Arab Summit 2025 in Baghdad, leaders rejected Palestinian displacement, urged Gaza aid, condemned Israeli aggression, and advanced food and economic strategies.
The Arab Summit held in Baghdad concluded with a comprehensive closing statement underscoring the collective stance of Arab states on key regional issues, with particular emphasis on Palestine, regional security, and coordinated political action.
Palestine at the heart of the Arab consensusThe summit’s closing statement reaffirmed the centrality of the Palestinian cause as the cause of the Arab nation and a cornerstone of regional stability. The Arab leaders expressed absolute support for the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, including their right to freedom, self-determination, and the establishment of an independent State of Palestine.
Participants called for an immediate halt to the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip and demanded intensified efforts to pressure for the opening of crossings and the delivery of humanitarian aid to all Palestinian territories. The statement also emphasized the need to implement relevant UN Security Council resolutions issued since the onset of the aggression.
The leaders rejected any form of forced displacement of Palestinians from their land under any pretext and welcomed international recognition of the State of Palestine. The statement particularly commended Spain, Norway, and Ireland for their recent recognition and urged other nations to follow suit.
Support was also expressed for Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas’s call to convene an international peace conference aimed at resolving the Palestinian issue on the basis of international legitimacy.
Calls for end to occupation, foreign aggressionThe statement demanded an end to the Israeli occupation of all Arab territories, including the Syrian Golan and South Lebanon, as part of a broader call for respect of sovereignty and territorial integrity across the region.
The summit also reiterated respect for the choices of the Syrian people and affirmed that Syria’s security and stability are essential to the region’s overall stability.
Support for regional stability, diplomacyArab leaders expressed full support for Lebanon in its efforts to overcome challenges and maintain security and unity. The summit also voiced solidarity with Sudan in its attempts to protect its resources and territory amid ongoing conflict and reaffirmed support for Libya through national dialogue and political reconciliation.
The summit appreciated Oman’s diplomatic mediation between Iran and the United States, framing it as a positive example of Arab diplomacy in action.
In addition, the leaders called for the establishment of a zone free of nuclear weapons and weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East, and condemned all forms of terrorism and its ideological roots.
Security, cyber cooperation, deterrence of hate speechThe summit welcomed Iraq’s efforts to combat terrorism and emphasized the importance of enhancing cybersecurity as part of joint Arab cooperation. The final statement also stressed the need to activate deterrent mechanisms against hate speech and affirmed that rising global tensions reflect a dangerous shift away from diplomacy toward militarized solutions.
The Baghdad Arab Summit closed with a unified message: regional challenges require solidarity, coordinated action, and firm positions rooted in justice, peace, and the collective interests of the Arab peoples.
Baghdad hosts fifth Arab development, economic, and social summitFollowing the main summit, Baghdad hosted the Fifth Arab Development, Economic, and Social Summit, focused on revitalizing regional economic cooperation and integration. The summit aimed to align national and regional development goals for mutual benefit.
Arab League Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit presented a comprehensive Arab food security strategy during the summit. He emphasized that Arab national security is an integrated whole, requiring parallel attention to food, social, cyber, and other sectors of security.
“Concrete solutions must be found for Arab food security,” he said, citing the strategy proposed in Baghdad as a roadmap for future resilience.
Aboul Gheit also addressed the impact of the global economic slowdown, noting its implications for food and social stability across the Arab region.
Commitment to economic integration, stabilityPalestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa voiced support for implementing the summit’s development initiatives, stressing the importance of working with regional and international partners to ensure stability and end ongoing wars.
Speaking on behalf of Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune, Algerian Foreign Minister Ahmed Attaf reinforced the call for meaningful economic unity. “Achieving economic integration must not remain a dream,” he said.
[…]
Defeating the Depopulation Agenda: The Sovereign Alliance vs. the Gaia Cult

As president Putin has emphasized at various times, not only has it never been proven that human-made CO2 drives climate variations, but it has also come to light that since 1998, the warming trend dominant since 1977 has been on an strange “pause”. While CO2 output steadly rose from 1938-1977, it was accompanied by a total cooling causing scientists in 1977 to sound the alarm that we were on the verge of an ice age.
This fact reflects the embarrassing reality that CO2 tends to follow climate variations rather than precede them, indicating that this greenhouse gas is actually being effected by the warming of the earth most likely driven by space-based causes as Putin has referred repeatedly. Even more surprising to some, recently published NASA studies have shown that the world’s biomass has increased by 10% in recent years due in large measure to the industrial growth policies of China and India. Plants have, after all, been observed to grow much better when fed by increased levels of carbon dioxide.
Ever since ancient times, it was understood that no political structure can function through simply utilitarian force, and so those modern social engineers setting the stage of the New World Order also knew that in this “End of History” age, a new religious system would be needed to keep the human cattle obedient and controllable.
This new religion of the New World Order would involve the generalized worship of Gaia… that same Earth Mother worship that shaped the cult systems of so much of the ancient world.
The only difference between this new Gaia Cult and the earlier Earth Mother cults of ancient Rome, Persia and Babylon, was that the 21st century variant would have a more “scientific” veneer and would be premised on terms like “reducing carbon footprints”, “sustainable development”, “adapting to carrying capacity” and “stopping global warming”.
The UN’s Millennial Development Goals, Agenda 21 (later renamed Agenda 2030) and The Earth Charter (all overseen by Maurice Strong, Steven Rockefeller and even Mikhail Gorbachev) did much to legitimize fringe pseudo-scientific Gaia concepts into international legal doctrines.
Strong was himself a devoted follower of the Gaia religion during his lifetime, and even called for creating a ‘World Gaia Day’ as an international holiday celebrating the inauguration of the UN’s Conference on Sustainable Development in 1992… which he also presided over.
Over the ensuing years, vast pressure was placed on nation states to castrate themselves on the altar of winning the war against Global Warming (soon to be renamed ‘Climate Change’).
Increasingly nation states were expected to act only in conformity with un-elected and often anonymous boards of IPCC ‘experts’ demanding drastic cuts to living standards in order to stop climate change.
Eco-Warrior Central Bankers such as Mark Carney, Mario Draghi and other anti-human technocrats began plans to rewire the entire world economy around a program of total depopulation centered around Green New Deals, and decarbonization- ignoring the fact that CO2 is plant food, and the carbon molecule is the driving force behind life on earth.[1]
A Crack in the Plan
Thankfully, in 2013, certain nations of Eurasia—most especially China and Russia—had enough. Although it took years of work, these two nations had gained sufficient strength to finally stand resolutely against the financier oligarchy controlling the City of London and Wall Street and asserted that they were not going to play the ‘New World Order’ depopulation game any longer.
As these nations began growing their influence through such new institutions as the BRICS, Shanghai Cooperation Organization and G20, they began working to assert their sovereign power to protect their people from the rapacious demands of the financier oligarchy on the one hand while laying out plans for the largest pro-industrial growth agenda ever before seen in world history.
This took the form of China’s Belt and Road Initiative, first announced in 2013, and which integrated into the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union and Polar Silk Road.
With this 2013 initiative, a new game was in town, which rejected depopulation, and which defended sovereign national power as a weapon to rein in the influence of fifth columnists (evidenced by Putin’s various clashes with Russian oligarchs and with China having cracked down on over 4.7 million corrupt CPC officials since Xi Jinping entered office).
In opposition to the closed system logic of the End of History Depopulation lobby, this new paradigm saw a program of Open System thinking emerge since 2013, which has been premised on the notion that cooperation, advanced industrial progress, and long term thinking are superior paths to security than periodically bombing nations back to the stone age.
We also began to see a restoration of sanity that challenged the 21st century Gaia cult that has sought to demonize carbon-using computer modelling for decades.
With the emergence of MAGA movement within the USA itself, a similar rejection of eco-genocide can be seen, which certainly offers hope that a coordinated alliance of like-minded nations may yet be able to break the controls of the depopulation lobby.
However, healing the wounds caused by several generations of brainwashing is not a simple matter. And the religious-like cults of modern Gaia worshippers represent a dangerous movement that will not easily give up on their obsession to save nature from humanity, and become useful members of the human speciess.
So, in order to appreciate this eco-movement and the danger it poses to freedom loving citizens everywhere, a little historical backstory is in order.
Where did it come from?
The current pressure to transform our entire world to the undisputed “reality” of man-made global warming finds its true origins in the Malthusian revival of 1968-1972.
In this short interval of time, a vacuum left by the elimination of pro-development leaders such as John F. Kennedy, Enrico Mattei, Charles de Gaulle, Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy was filled by establishment hacks and cowards. These tools ushered in a paradigm shift towards “conservationism,” and rejected the industrial growth ethic that defined western civilization up until that point.
This Malthusian Revival answered the challenge put forth by Eugenics Society president and UNESCO founder Julian Huxley.
Of course, just one year after the world had come to realize the horrors of Nazi eugenics, Huxley and his associates among the Anglo-American elite who financed Hitler had a big job to clean up the image of eugenics and re-package it under another name.
The Club of Rome and 1001 Nature Trust
In 1968, an organization was formed known as the Club of Rome, led by two misanthropes named Aurelio Peccei and OECD Director General for Scientific Affairs Sir Alexander King. It promulgated a new gospel to the world: the age of scientific progress and industrial growth must stop in order for the world to reset its values under a new paradigm of zero-technological growth.
Both Peccei and King were also advocates of a new pseudoscience dubbed “World Problematique,” which was developed in the early 1960s and can simply be described as “the science of global problems.” Unlike other branches of science, solving problems facing humanity was not the concern for followers of Problematique. Its adherents asserted that the future could be known by first analyzing the infinite array of “problems” which humanity creates in modifying the environment.
[…]
An adherent to Problematique would fixate on every “problem” caused by humans naively attempting to solve problems. They would note that every human intervention leads to dis-equilibrium, and thus unpredictability. The Problematique-oriented mind would conclude that if the “problem that causes all problems” were eliminated, then a clean, pre-determined world of perfect stasis, and thus predictability, would ensue.
Reporting on the growth of the Club of Rome’s World Problematique agenda in 1972, OECD Vice Chair, and Club of Rome member Hugo Thiemann told Europhysics News,
[…]
The organization quickly set up branches across the Anglo-Saxon world, with members ranging from select ideologues from the political, business, and scientific community who all agreed that society’s best form of governance was a scientific dictatorship.
Sir Alexander wrote:
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
In order to finance this paradigm shift, the 1001 Trust was founded in 1970 by Prince Bernhardt of the Netherlands.
Bernhardt (card carrying Nazi and founder of the Bilderberger Group in 1954) had worked alongside his close misanthropic associates Prince Philip Mountbatten, and Sir Julian Huxley to create the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) just a few years earlier. The plan was simple: each of the 1001 founding members simply put $10,000 into the trust, which was then directed towards the green paradigm shift.
Other prominent 1001 Club members included international royalty, billionaires, and technocratic sociopaths who wanted nothing more than to manage this promised Brave New World as “alphas”. Many of these figures were also members of the Club of Rome, including Canada’s Maurice Strong, who later became Vice President of the WWF under Prince Philip’s presidency.
Strong had replaced another WWF Vice President by the name of Louis Mortimer Bloomfield. Bloomfield was another 1001 Club member whom New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison discovered to be at the heart of the Montreal-based assassination of the anti-Malthusian President John F. Kennedy in 1963.
The document that became the bible and blueprint of this new anti-humanist movement that birthed today’s Green New Deal agenda was titled Limits to Growth (1972) and today holds the record as the most widely read book on ecology, having sold 30 million copies published into 32 languages.
[…]
The book itself was the culmination of a two year study undertaken by a team of MIT statisticians under the nominal heading of Jay Forrester and Dennis Meadows. While Forrester died in 2016, Meadows is still alive, and recently shared his sick vision of a future where, at most, 1-2 billion people will be granted permission to exist by a ruling oligarchy.
[…]
Malthusianism in Brief
These Club of Rome/WWF/1001 Club members dubbed themselves “neo Malthusians,” referring to the ideology popularized by the British Empire’s Thomas Malthus.
Malthus’ 1799 Essay on the Principle of Population pessimistically noticed that human population grows geometrically while food production grows arithmetically, leading invariably to a crisis point of over-population. This crisis point creates a mathematical foundation for the concept that later came to be dubbed “carrying capacity” by the authors of Limits to Growth.
Of course, rather than permit those human cattle from developing their minds in order to make more discoveries and inventions, which would offset this crisis point, Malthus (and his heirs later) knew that the British Empire which employed him could never exist were that creative power unleashed. Instead, Malthus coldly advocated the elimination of the “unfit to make way for the more fit.”
[…]
By re-packaging Malthus’ assumptions into a more complex computing system, these neo-Malthusians wanted to create a shame based movement of willful self-annihilation among an entire generation of baby boomers.
Of course, if you assume that technological progress has ended, then it will certainly appear that a closed system of fixed limited resources can only be managed by a technocratic elite choosing who gets diminishing returns as the world settles into some imaginary “mathematical equilibrium” of sustainability.
[…]
Via https://matthewehret.substack.com/p/defeating-the-depopulation-agenda
The Most Revolutionary Act
- Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's profile
- 11 followers
