Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 67

US aid site collapses in Gaza amid mismanagement, Israeli gunfire

Al Mayadeen English

aAid distribution fails in Rafah amid chaos, Israeli gunfire, and US contractor withdrawal as Gaza officials blame “Israel” for deepening starvation.

The latest attempt to distribute aid in Rafah as part of the ethnic cleansing plan descended into chaos on Tuesday, as the American-managed distribution mechanism built to push people south of the strip, by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, failed catastrophically, an Al Mayadeen correspondent on the ground reported.

The site reportedly collapsed due to overcrowding, disorganization, and a lack of control by the overseeing company, resulting in the destruction of a large portion of the facility.

The scenes showed a harrowing sight of people being driven inside overcrowded narrow paths made of metal fences and barbed wire, reminiscent of WW2 nazi concentration camps. https://x.com/SuppressedNws/status/19...

The breakdown was further compounded by live fire from Israeli occupation helicopters, which targeted the vicinity of the distribution center, escalating panic among the gathered civilians. Israeli media outlets, including Yedioth Ahronoth, confirmed that Israeli occupation forces opened heavy fire at Palestinians from Gaza who had stormed the aid complex.

The same outlet also claimed that armed personnel contracted by the American company overseeing the site fled the scene amid the surge in crowds. In response, Israeli commentators criticized the incident as yet another security failure similar to previous breakdowns in the so-called Netzarim axis, pointing to the “privatization of security tasks inside hostile territory by foreign contractors.”

Aid system reflects ‘systematic starvation policy’

In a strongly worded statement, the Government Media Office in Gaza condemned the collapse of the Rafah aid distribution plan, accusing the Israeli occupation of deliberate sabotage. “The occupation has utterly failed in its project to distribute aid in the zones of racial segregation,” the statement read.

It further asserted that the occupation’s interference at the aid distribution center “exposes the collapse of the so-called humanitarian process it claims to lead,” calling the scene “irrefutable evidence of the occupation’s failure to manage the crisis it has intentionally created.”

[…]

Via https://english.almayadeen.net/news/p...

The Rise and Fall of the West’s Propaganda Regime

Zero Hedge

Propaganda used to control Western democracies is running headlong into searchable facts freely available on the internet. As a result, the powerful cannot maintain their self-sustaining narratives and are behaving erratically and defensively, like bees when their nest is disturbed.

Opposition leaders in France, Romania, and Brazil have been barred from elections. They were accused of spreading “disinformation” and then prosecuted for unrelated crimes. In the United States, the same lawfare was attempted against President Trump, but he won anyway.

Sun Tzu’s first principle of war is “know the enemy,” but knowledge is difficult in an information war. Propaganda plants lies in every soul. In 1928, the father of modern public relations, Edward Bernay (who also happened to be the nephew of Sigmund Freud), wrote in his book Propaganda:

The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. …We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. …In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons…who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.

Propaganda works by contrasting two sides. Empathy for an opponent’s position is systematically removed by control of information. Public policy filtered through propaganda is always a binary choice.

In wartime, “us versus them” in a “kill or be killed” conflict provides the necessary binary, and propaganda writes itself. Domestic propaganda in peacetime is a bit trickier but works the same way: by staking out two sides.

Mass media permits distinct information sources. Elections award one side or the other with temporary political rule, but power is never actually surrendered. Each side simply acts as a fulcrum for the other side to pivot. Wedge issues inject urgency, but they are designed to produce a stalemate.

[…]

Via https://www.zerohedge.com/political/rise-and-fall-wests-propaganda-regime

Does NATO Still Exist?

By Dmitry Orlov<

As it says right on the NATO web page, "NATO is a political and military alliance of countries from Europe and North America." Note the order of the adjectives: it is political first and military second. This is by no means an accident: NATO happens to be militarily insignificant. Its only success is in dismembering Serbia to create Kosovo. Destroying Libya hardly counts as a success. But NATO has certainly been successful politically, becoming much larger. Between the collapse of the USSR and the beginning of Russia's Special Military Operation in the former Ukraine, it absorbed Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Albania, Croatia, Montenegro, and North Macedonia. NATO had plans to ingest the Ukraine and Georgia as well but choked, then settled for the more digestible Finland and Sweden as consolation prizes.

Expansion is one of NATO's main functions. Newly ingested nations have to have their militaries trained and equipped with mostly US-made weapons according to mostly Nazi German-inspired NATO standards and this requires a huge, sprawling bureaucracy. Another major function of the NATO bureaucracy is planning and organizing training exercises in the course of which various NATO member militaries collaborate on attacking Russia or repelling Russian attack (because there are no other enemies to think of) undaunted by the facts that attacking Russia would be pure suicide and that Russia has no interest whatsoever in attacking any NATO member countries (but stands ready to destroy them if they attack Russia).

This last parenthetic clarification needs some unfolding. Although NATO is supposedly a defensive organization, it hasn't actually ever defended any of its members. It has participated in various US-led offensive operations (in former Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan). NATO charter's Article 5 stipulates that in case of attack against a NATO members, other NATO members have to hold consultations on coming to the aid of the suffering NATO member, but each member gets to decide what aid to offer (it could be limited to mailing it a box of delicious lollypops). More importantly, there is no stipulation that if a NATO member is attacked, other NATO members have to voluntarily commit suicide by attempting to defend that member.

Let us consider a specific example. Suppose that Russia decides that it has finally had enough of British meddling in countries close to Russia's borders and decides to fix the problem once and for all. A choice weapon to use would be one of its new Sarmat missiles. These missiles are fired from a mobile launcher, take a few minutes to deploy, fly arbitrary paths through the stratosphere (making them impossible to intercept) and carry 10 hypersonic reentry vehicles, each of which independently maneuvers precisely to its target and carries a nuclear charge of between 800 kilotonnes and 2 megatonnes. One such rocket, delivering 20 megatonnes, would be sufficient to neutralize Britain politically and militarily for all time, meaning that there would be nothing there for the rest of NATO to defend.

There would still be the question of vengeance, but what NATO members would be willing to commit suicide by attacking Russia in a futile attempt to avenge Britain? None, really. As for British retaliation, Britain does have four Vanguard-class submarines armed with increasingly unreliable American-made Trident II D-5 ballistic missiles, but it is entirely uncertain whether any of them would be launched in response and in any case Russia has missile defense batteries that would intercept them. This is all purely hypothetical, of course, because the Russians are patient to a fault and will in all likelihood just sit back and watch the British establishment degenerate at its own brisk pace, being just a decade or two away from becoming entirely harmless. On the other hand, if Russia were to destroy Britain prophylactically, none of the remaining countries would even dream of bothering Russia for a good long time. "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure," as the British like to say.

Let us therefore leave aside the silly notion of NATO's mutual defense doctrine as a bedtime story for mildly retarded children and focus on NATO's actual core competencies: expansion, weapons procurement and military training exercises. While the expansion part of the NATO bureaucracy is now happily chomping away on Sweden and Finland, it is hard to ignore that the failure to engulf and devour the Ukraine and Georgia has stopped the NATO enlargement juggernaut in its tracks.

Georgia's absorption into NATO was aborted quite swiftly. In 2008, during the Summer Olympics in Beijing, the Georgian military, under NATO and Israeli tutelage, attacked Russian peacekeepers in neighboring South Ossetia. The Russians then rolled into Georgia and took barely a week to thoroughly humiliate the Georgian military. Peace was restored, although some Georgians still fester over their defeat and join up with the Ukrainians as mercenaries, thereby achieving two defeats for the price of one. The Georgians were quick to realize that going to war with Russia was a bad idea and that NATO membership would make them vulnerable rather than secure, but there remained the possibility of being engulfed and devoured by the European Union. This possibility persisted until 2024, which was marked by the failure of a color revolution attempt. Georgia's EU-installed president (a French national) was dethroned and civil relations with Russia were restored.

NATO's attempt to engulf and devour the Ukraine has been in the works since 2014 and is still a work in progress, although most sane people now consider it an impossibility for a number of excellent reasons such as a lack of undisputed, secure borders and an ongoing military conflict with Russia. It all started with the overthrow of the legitimate, elected government in Kiev and its replacement by a unelected, illegitimate one appointed personally by Victoria Nuland of the US State Department. The people of Crimea would have nothing to do with these new rulers, and neither would the people of Donetsk and Lugansk regions. Crimea swiftly seceded and voted to join the Russian Federation while Donetsk and Lugansk remained as separatist regions within Ukraine. The Kiev regime then launched what it called an "anti-terrorist operation" against these two regions. In response, Donetsk and Lugansk organized local resistance forces.

Why did the Russians accept Crimea but did not immediately accept Donetsk and Lugansk? The simple answer is that Russia understood that war was inevitable but needed time. It used that time to build new weapons systems (Kinzhal, Tsirkon, Oreshnik, Poseidon, Sarmat/Avangard, etc.), launch 42 warships, 11 nuclear attack submarines and 11 diesel-electric submarines and to reorganize its military and its defense industry to prepare it for modern combat.

Fast-forward to 2022. The volunteer resistance forces, merely 30 thousand men, held a defensive line for 9 long years, suffering some 10.000 mostly civilian casualties from Ukraine's relentless shelling of residential districts. By February of 2022 the Ukrainian army was finally ready to crush the resistance. The two regions prepared for this inevitability by holding independence referendums, declaring independence and asking Russia for military assistance. Russia responded by recognizing the newly independent republics and agreeing to offer military assistance. These were all perfectly legal maneuvers in accordance with international law with Kosovo providing the legal precedent. The Russian army struck exactly one day before the planned Ukrainian attack and thwarted it. Soon thereafter, a negotiated end to the conflict was reached between Kiev and Moscow: the Ukraine would leave Donetsk and Lugansk alone, disarm, repeal anti-Russian laws and swear to military neutrality.

However, NATO would have none of that. Boris Johnson flew to Kiev and ordered the Ukrainians to fight "to the last Ukrainian" and that is exactly what the Ukrainians have been doing ever since — for three years running. That is not what is surprising; after all, NATO shouldn't be expected to let go of its victims so easily. What is surprising is that the Ukrainians have been quite willing, for three years running, to fight this futile war "to the last Ukrainian," suffering disproportionately higher casualties than the Russian side, while their eventual defeat has been guaranteed all along. But this is a topic for another article — one best written by a team of clinical psychiatrists with expertise in suicide cults. In any case, the short of it is that NATO has lost twice in a row: in Georgia and in the former Ukraine.

"What's the difference?" you might think. "Another country, another fiasco — NATO should be accustomed to endless defeat by now." But the former Ukraine is different. First, the Ukraine is by no means a trivial case. It is right in the center of Europe and is the largest country in Europe by area. Second, the war in the Ukraine is not between the Ukraine and Russia, as Western propaganda would have you believe. Rather, the Ukrainians are just pawns, willing or (increasingly) unwilling, in a proxy conflict between the United States (with the rest of NATO in tow) and the Russian Federation. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that it is a "proxy war," in these exact words; who are we to argue otherwise? Defeat in this proxy war would not be so bad for the United States — hiding behind an ocean and not saddled with too many Ukrainian refugees (a few hundred thousand are about to be expelled, together with some Haitians and some Syrians). But it would be a disaster for the EU (Poland and Germany especially) where Ukrainian refugees/migrants number in the millions and their ranks are likely to swell further in the course of Ukrainian defeat. European leaders, unpopular as they already are, dread the reputational damage they will suffer as supporters of the Kiev regime who have imposed austerity on their populations in order to lavish funds on Kiev and the refugees.

The Ukraine is a localized problem, but there is a global problem: NATO is running out of countries to engulf and devour. Like a cancer, NATO has to grow all the time (or an entire army of well-paid NATO bureaucrats would have to be dismissed for having nothing to do). They have already swallowed all of the tiny nations: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania; Montenegro and (Northern) Macedonia. And so NATO had no choice but to gobble up previously neutral Sweden and Finland.

There is, however, an issue with having Sweden and Finland join a military bloc. Sweden, you see, signed the Treaty of Nystad with Russia in 1721, in which Sweden, having been defeated in the Northern War, swore to military neutrality. And Finland, after its disastrous dalliance with Hitler, signed with Russia the Treaty of Paris of 1947, in which Finland swore to… military neutrality. Now, the act of abrogating one's responsibilities as they are spelled out in a peace treaty generally means an automatic return to a state of war. By accepting these two countries, NATO was expanding its membership by two countries that are now automatically in a state of war with Russia, thereby violating Chapter 8 of the NATO charter. Perhaps Yanis Varoufakis, economist and former Greek minister of finance, had a point when he said that Europe is now "the stupid continent."<

What would such a war look like? More humiliation for NATO, we must suppose, but will it be the same sort of humiliation suffered by NATO in the former Ukraine or something more severe. We must bear in mind that for Russia the Ukrainian territory is a special case because it is historically Russian territory (Malorussia and Novorussia is what it had been called for centuries) peopled by people who speak Russian as their main and native language, were baptized in the Russian Orthodox church and are culturally Russian. Yes, they have been brain-damaged to the point of hating who they actually are and embracing a fake, synthetic identity. A Ukrainian is a Russian who was forced to stop being Russian but went beyond and stopped being human. Atrocities committed by Ukrainian troops in Russia's Kursk region attest to the fact that these are brain-damaged monsters.

[…]

Via https://boosty.to/cluborlov/posts/701621af-c9b9-445d-85a3-98c97c7ff86c

My Mother Sold Me: Cambodia Where Virginity is a Commodity

My Mother Sold Me: Cambodia Where Virginity is a Commodity*

Directed by (2018)

Film Review

https://rtd.rt.com/films/my-mother-sold-me/

This film profiles three Cambodian girls whose mothers forced them into prostitution to pay rent and buy food for their younger siblings. Although increasing trade and tourism are improving Cambodia’s economy, it’s still recovering from from the US-sponsored Khmer Rouge genocide (1975-790. Millions live on $1 a day. The Cambodian government provides financial or other support for indigent residents.

According to UNICEF, 1/3 of Cambodia’s sex workers (many pre-teens) are under 18. Many Cambodian men subscribe to the superstitious belief that sleeping with a virgin will give men strength and long life.

One mother got a $1000 fee for offering her 15-year-old virgin daughter for sex. She then used these funds to start a lottery ticket business. Although her daughter still attends school to qualify for a good job, she’s spurned by her classmates who view her as a prostitute.

Thai authorities (Child Protection Unit) emphasize enforcement efforts on adults who prey on pre-teen kids. One six-year old whose mother was forcing her to beg on the street lost custody after police sent her child to her grandmother.

The filmmakers also profile a 14-year-old who moved to the capitol Phnom Penh after her parent died and left her an orphan. After she hooked up with a boyfriend to get off the streets, he made her sleep with other people for money. Now 16, she’s a professional sex worker and hopes to make enough money to open a beauty salon with a friend who became a prostitute at 14 following stranger rape.

Another 15-year-old (TI) felt pressured to become a prostitute after her mother sold her virginity for $500. After her husband abandoned the family, the mother mainly supported her three children through prostitution. Ti, who has left school, found that once she became a prostitute her bad reputation prevented her from getting any other work.

*The Cambodian government has jailed the Cambodian interpreter who helped RT produce this film and there is an international campaign for his release.

 

China Declines to Condemn October 7

[image error]

Mike Whitney

China has never explicitly condemned the attacks of October 7. In China’s view, October 7 can’t be separated from the more than seven decades of Israeli brutality, apartheid and occupation. Naturally, this has drawn harsh criticism from Israel which expressed its “deep disappointment” over China’s refusal to repudiate Hamas. Even so, China has not caved in to Israeli pressure or softened its rhetoric. Quite the contrary, on February 22, 2024, Ma Xinmin—a legal advisor to China’s Foreign Ministry and a member of the International Law Commission—summarized China’s views of Hamas’ activities during a presentation to the International Court of Justice at The Hague. Here’s part of what he said:

The Palestinian-Israeli conflict stems from Israel’s prolonged occupation of Palestinian territory and Israel’s longstanding oppression of the Palestinian people. The Palestinian people fight against Israeli oppression and their struggle for completing the establishment of an independent state on the occupied territory are essentially just actions for restoring their legitimate rights. The right to self-determination served as the precise legal foundation for this struggle. MEMRI

The fact that China chose a legal scholar—who is a member of the International Law Commission—to argue their case, underscores the importance China places on the broader legal issue of whether the Hamas attack was justifiable under international law. Ma concludes that the attack was not only justifiable, but that the militants involved in the attack had an “inalienable right” to conduct operations that were aimed at ending the Israeli occupation. Here’s Ma:

“The Palestinian people’s use of force to resist foreign oppression and complete the establishment of an independent state is an inalienable right …. The struggle waged by peoples for their liberation, right to self-determination, including armed struggle against colonialism, occupation, aggression, domination against foreign forces should not be considered terrorism.” MEMRI

Ma’s statement should not be construed as support for the injuring or killing of innocent civilians. It is, however, a powerful defense of the right of persecuted people to participate in armed struggle against their oppressors.

Most readers don’t know that China resisted Israel’s coercion and defended international law as it relates to the October 7 attacks. They don’t know that China took a stand on a matter of principle and never flinched. Of course, most people don’t realize that of the 195 countries in the world, only 13 officially designate Hamas as a “terrorist organization”. Many believe that the terrorist moniker is applied universally and that the rest of humanity see the world through the same distorted lens as people in America. But they don’t. They see Hamas as a national liberation movement that was duly elected to govern Gaza in 2006 following “free and fair” elections that were forced on the Palestinians by the Bush administration. Now Hamas is being used as the pretext for the slaughter women and children in Gaza on an industrial scale. Most Western leaders have expressed their support for Israel’s 18-month bloodbath, while China has not only opposed it but also defended the Palestinians right to armed struggle. Here’s Professor Richard Falk, a leading scholar in international law and former UN Special Rapporteur for Palestine:

“The right of resistance was affirmed during the decolonization process in the 1980s and 1990s, and this included the right to armed resistance. However, this resistance is subject to compliance with international laws of war.”

Even the preamble to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that “whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law”.

Israel does not comply with international laws of war—for example, the entire situation in Gaza is one of the most flagrant violations of Israel’s complete disregard, not only for the laws of war, but for the entire apparatus of international and humanitarian laws.

Palestinians, on the other hand, who are in a permanent state of self-defense, are driven by a different set of values than Israel. One is that they are fully aware of the need to maintain moral legitimacy in their methods of resistance….

“To the extent that there is real evidence of atrocities accompanying the October 7 attack, those would constitute violations, but the attack itself is something that, in context, appears entirely justifiable and long overdue,” Falk said. Palestine Chronicle

This is why Israel has fabricated so many stories about beheaded babies, mass rape and the killing of innocent civilians. The intention is to persuade the public that October 7 was not a legitimate expression of political resistance but a wanton act of terror aimed at ordinary people. Western analysts typically focus on fake atrocities that are used to drown out any reasonable discussion about historic oppression or political realities. Here’s Falk again:

One of the tactics used by the West and Israel has been to almost succeed in decontextualizing October 7 so that it appears to have come out of the blue... The UN Secretary-General was even defamed as an antisemite for merely pointing out the most obvious fact—that there had been a long history of abuse of the Palestinian people leading up to it,” he added, referring to Antonio Guterres’ simply stating that October 7 “did not happen in a vacuum”. (Palestine Chronicle)

“Decontextualizing October 7”?

[image error]

Precisely. The case for genocide is made on the basis that October 7 can be removed from its broader historical “context” and seen as a “stand alone” event that requires a particularly violent response. But October 7 is not a stand-alone event; it is the unavoidable explosion of collective resistance to decades of ethnic hatred and brutality aimed at a particular people who have been stripped of their civil rights and left to languish in an apartheid state. Here’s Ma again:

“Our state is obliged to promote the realization of the right to self-determination and to refrain from any forceful action, which deprives people of that right. In pursuit of their right to self-determination, these people have the right to engage in struggles, seek and receive support on the basis of that right….

“Numerous UN General Assembly resolutions recognize the legitimacy of struggle by all available means, including armed struggle, by peoples under colonial domination or foreign occupation, to realize the right to self-determination.
MEMRI

Video Link

Naturally, Ma’s speech has largely been blacked out in the western media where anything that doesn’t jibe with the Israeli narrative (that October 7 was an act of terrorism) winds up “on the cutting room floor”. We are confident that if Ma’s powerful moral statement was more widely circulated, Israel’s support in the US would crumble.

China Offers To Rebuild Gaza

China has supported every UN Resolution aimed at providing humanitarian relief to the people in Gaza. They have been staunch supporters of Palestinian statehood and the two-state solution from the beginning. They have repeatedly called for an end to the fighting and an immediate ceasefire. They have even met with leaders of Hamas and Fatah (in April and July 2024) to see if reconciliation between the two groups was possible in order to promote Palestinian unity. Finally, China has repeatedly offered to “rebuild Gaza” following the end of hostilities which underscores Beijing’s commitment to an independent Palestinian state living side-by-side with Israel.

At every opportunity, China has supported policies aimed at de-escalation, reconciliation and peace. They have exhibited the type of ‘moral clarity’ and moral leadership we would like to see from the United States but never do. It is China’s moral clarity that “guides its decisions, even in complex or ambiguous situations, without being swayed by competing interests or relativism. It’s about aligning actions with a consistent moral framework, often rooted in universal values like honesty, fairness, or compassion.”

Israel’s savagery in Gaza suggests that the West is in a state of irreversible moral collapse. We should be grateful that China is stepping in to fill the void and lead the world into the next century.

[…]

Via https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/do-you-condemn-october-7-china-says-no/

Leaked Video Exposes Gates and CIA Bioengineering Viruses to Control People’s Minds

By Baxter Dmitry

Bill Gates has spent billions carefully crafting a public image—as the benevolent billionaire, the sweater-wearing tech genius turned global health guru. The media tell us he’s just a harmless philanthropist, a forward-thinking visionary and virus whisperer who somehow manages to predict global pandemics with eerie precision.

But what if I told you that behind that creepy rictus smile lies a decades-old agenda, one forged in secret meetings with shadowy government agencies—an agenda that strikes at the very core of what makes us human?

At the center of this agenda is something scientists call the “God Gene.” Scientifically known as VMAT2, it’s understood to be a biological key—a genetic pathway that enables spiritual experience, higher consciousness, a connection to God… or whatever greater force governs the universe.

And it’s this very gene that Bill Gates—and his allies in intelligence circles—recognized as a threat and set their laser-focused efforts on long ago.

Why? Because a spiritually connected human is a free human. A dangerous human. And the elite don’t want dangerous. They want compliant.

Gates’ weapons of choice? Viruses. Vaccines. And stratospheric aerosol injections. Better know as chemtrails.

And if all of this sounds too wild… too far out there… too conspiratorial to be real—then listen closely. Two things you need to know.

First: we’ve got the receipts. Documents, patents, and most damningly, leaked video footage of Gates’ himself—proof that the global elite, with Gates at the helm, are waging an all-out war on the human soul.

Second: remember who’s been right. Over the last few years, the so-called “conspiracy theorists” have called it again and again—on surveillance, on censorship, on lab leaks, on vaccines, on chemtrails.

It’s time to open your mind—before the elite close it for good.

Gates has never been shy about dropping hints—almost as if he wants us to know what’s coming. Take, for example, the time he casually mentioned the idea of death panels—where unelected elites would decide who gets life-saving care and who doesn’t.

It wasn’t a warning. It was a preview. A glimpse into the cold, calculated future they’re designing—where human life is measured in algorithms, cost-efficiency, and obedience.

Just look at what is happening in WEF-infiltrated Canada as we speak.

Gates’ death panels are here. His family blames his inability to keep his plans to himself on his alleged Asperger’s Syndrome. Others say he is engaging in predictive programming.

Whatever the truth may be, one thing is clear: Gates hasn’t always wanted his most diabolical plans out in the open. Take his involvement with the God Gene—a genetic marker believed to enable spiritual experience and higher states of consciousness. He’s never mentioned it publicly. Not once.

But we know.

Because back in the early 2000s, Gates presented his research—not to the public, but to the CIA. A secret briefing. A plan to neutralize religious or spiritual impulses and crush the human soul through targeted intervention at the genetic level.

And how do we know this?

Because we’ve got the leaked tape. And once you hear what’s on it, you’ll understand exactly why they wanted it buried.

The CIA took a keen interest in Gates’ approach to dismantling VMAT2—the God Gene—because they saw its potential as a powerful psychological weapon to be deployed in Iraq and the War on Terror.

In their eyes, this wasn’t just biotech—it was battlefield strategy.

They believed that by suppressing spiritual and religious impulses in targeted individuals and populations, they could pacify resistance, disrupt belief systems, and gain the upper hand in ideological warfare.

But what the agents in that room didn’t yet grasp was that Gates’ vision went far beyond the battlefield.

For Gates, it was something much bigger. A blueprint for global control. A way to quietly strip entire populations of their spiritual autonomy, their higher consciousness, their very connection to the divine.

This wasn’t just about winning a war overseas. This was about reshaping humanity itself—through viruses and vaccines.

In that one chilling sentence, Gates laid out his entire blueprint for the future. Anyone who dares to question the agenda—who resists, who thinks too freely—will be labeled an extremist, a radical.

And through targeted genetic interventions, that so-called “dangerous behavior” won’t just be punished… it will be eradicated.

Feeling that chill crawl down your spine yet? Stay with us—because what comes next is even darker.

Gates’ war on independent thought—on those who dare to believe differently—has been quietly unfolding for decades.

Disturbingly, more than 20 years ago, he was already involved in developing viruses and vaccines not just for public health, but as tools to target dissent.

Under skeptical questioning from an agent, Gates openly admits to creating viruses and vaccines to “immunize” the enemy against what he calls “VMAT2 over-expression.”

Game, set, and match. Check-mate. Gates’ entire agenda has been exposed.

This was never about curing disease. It was about control. Silencing opposition at the biological level. Engineering compliance in populations that refused to fall in line with his globalist vision.

And the deeper you dig, the darker it gets.

Over a century ago, whispers began to circulate among the global elite—discussions of a radical idea: a vaccine designed not to protect, but to control, as Greg Reese reports.

And now, after decades of planning, funding, and quiet experimentation, that agenda has arrived.

It goes without saying: the mainstream media—many of whom receive generous funding from Gates-backed foundations—are doing everything in their power to bury this story. They label it “dangerous misinformation,” dismiss it as conspiracy theory, and smear anyone who dares to speak out.

But their panic is telling. Because no amount of spin can cover up the truth when the evidence is this overwhelming.

We’re talking about peer-reviewed studies and declassified documents—all pointing to the same chilling reality: tampering with the VMAT2 gene isn’t just risky… it could have devastating consequences for human consciousness itself.

No amount of “fact-checking” can put this genie back in the bottle.

Every thread ties back to a single, unified conspiracy: a war—not just on freedom or truth—but on the very essence of what it means to be human.

Every thread ties back to a single, unified conspiracy: a war—not just on freedom or truth—but on the very essence of what it means to be human.

This is where things get really dark.

A controversial but real research paper, published on ResearchGate in 2023, revealed a Department of Defense-funded program aimed at suppressing Gates’ longstanding target, the VMAT2 gene.

A testimony by a U.S. bioweapons scientist cited in the research outlined a DARPA program designed to do the unthinkable: erase humanity’s connection to the divine.

Here’s the kicker. DARPA is working with the Gates Foundation to do this work.

And they are using the same very same tools Gates spoke about in his presentation to the CIA in 2002: viruses, vaccines, and aerosolized chemtrails deployment.

[…]

Via https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/leaked-video-exposes-gates-and-cia-bioengineering-viruses-to-control-peoples-minds/

It’s 2025, but Africans are still in chains. Why?

© Getty Images / Harvepino

By Moussa Ibrahim

As Gaddafi’s last spokesperson, I saw what real African independence can look like: free education, universal healthcare, interest-free housing, and no IMF interference

The past few days have offered a brutal snapshot of Africa’s unresolved crisis. In Burkina Faso, militants from Jama’at Nusrat ul-Islam wa al-Muslimin (JNIM), affiliated with Al-Qaeda, overran the Diapaga military base in the east, seizing most of the city and exposing the precarious state of security in the Sahel. Meanwhile, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the M23 rebel armed group, which has been fighting the government since the beginning of the year, tightens its grip on Goma, leading to vulnerable political conditions in which stolen minerals are funneled to foreign markets. In the diplomatic arena, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa was treated with disrespect in the US when President Donald Trump ambushed him with a crude, racist presentation about so-called “white genocide,” using footage falsely attributed to South Africa. Kenya now fears economic chaos as the US threatens to revoke the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) trade deal, a reminder that many African economies are still at the mercy of external powers.

This is the continent’s daily reality. Behind the headlines lie patterns of systemic violence, extraction, and manipulation. Whether it is Boko Haram in Nigeria, Al-Shabaab in Somalia, or foreign security firms in Mozambique, the message is the same: Africa’s enemies are armed not only with bullets but with contracts, media narratives, and economic traps. The ‘post-colonial’ moment has long expired – what remains is a managed crisis, policed by the IMF, militarized by AFRICOM, and sanitized by the African Union’s silence.

And yet, in the middle of this, we are told to celebrate. May 25th is Africa Day – the anniversary of the founding of the Organization of African Unity (OAU) in 1963. Every year, flags are raised, speeches are delivered, and African leaders sing songs of unity. But let’s ask the uncomfortable question: What exactly are we celebrating?

When Kwame Nkrumah, Gamal Abdel Nasser, Julius Nyerere, Ahmed Sekou Toure, and Haile Selassie came together to form the OAU, their aim was not to build bureaucracies. It was to liberate the continent – militarily, economically, culturally, and ideologically. They envisioned a single army, a common currency, a unified foreign policy, and a break from Western dependency.

Nkrumah famously said: “Africa must unite or perish.” Today, we see more perishing than unity. Sixty-two years later, Africa Day has been reduced to a symbolic spectacle – flags without force, drums without direction. We watch parades while our lands are auctioned. We hear Pan-African slogans while our central banks answer to Paris. We commemorate independence while 14 African countries still use a currency created by their former colonizer – the CFA franc, a tool of economic control whose name itself means ‘Financial Cooperation in Africa’ – but cooperation for whom?

Over 25 African countries are either in or near debt default. Collectively, the continent owes over $650 billion to external creditors. Nigeria spends substantial sums of its revenue servicing debt. Ghana, once called a rising star, is back at the IMF for the 17th time. In Zambia, debt repayments have choked investment in hospitals and education. This isn’t mismanagement – it’s engineered subservience. The so-called development partners make billions while entire generations are sacrificed to the gods of fiscal discipline.

Meanwhile, Africa’s material wealth continues to flow outward. The DRC supplies more than 70% of the world’s cobalt, yet over 70% of its people live in poverty. Our uranium powers Europe’s cities while Niger’s villages remain in darkness. African agriculture – despite controlling 60% of the world’s uncultivated arable land – is gutted by foreign subsidies and aid dependency.

We import $40 billion in food each year, while our farmers are criminalized or displaced by foreign agribusiness. It is no exaggeration to say: Africa is being starved by design.

But exploitation today is not only economic – it’s also digital. Foreign companies dominate our telecom infrastructure, cloud storage, and digital platforms. Our data is stored abroad, our elections influenced by foreign code, our children fed algorithmic colonialism on social media. AI tools are trained on African voices but controlled by Silicon Valley. The scramble for Africa 2.0 is here – and it’s happening on screens.

Even our culture is colonized anew. Our stories are funded by Western NGOs. Our artists are rewarded for repeating narratives of trauma, not defiance. From art galleries to film festivals, African creatives are often made to conform to donor expectations. Real revolutionary expression is defunded, censored, or drowned in an ocean of meaningless ‘diversity’ campaigns. Cultural sovereignty requires more than visibility – it requires ownership.

What makes this tragedy worse is that many of our own leaders are complicit. Elites who benefit from foreign contracts, imported goods, and IMF handouts – pose as nationalists while enabling neocolonialism.

But Africa is not silent. In Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger, new governments are challenging the old order. They have expelled French troops, broken from the CFA zone, and are building a regional alliance rooted in sovereignty. Western media calls them juntas. But to millions of Africans, they are a new hope. These governments are not perfect – but they are confronting imperialism where the African Union has capitulated. Their stand echoes that of Sankara, Nkrumah, and Gaddafi.

As Gaddafi’s last spokesperson, I saw what real African independence looked like. Free education, universal healthcare, interest-free housing, and no IMF interference. Gaddafi’s dream of a gold-backed African currency and a continental defense force terrified the West – not because it was mad, but because it was achievable. That is why Libya was destroyed. The lesson is simple: When you challenge an empire, it fights back.

But we must not retreat. Africa must forge new alliances – not with masters, but with partners. Cooperation with China, Russia, India, and Brazil must be based on mutual respect and shared interest – not dependency. We must demand technology transfers, co-ownership of infrastructure, and the right to control our natural resources. BRICS can be a platform of liberation – but only if Africa enters as a united, self-respecting bloc.

Equally vital is a revolution of the mind. Our educational systems still glorify colonizers and marginalize indigenous knowledge. Our universities chase Western rankings while neglecting community development. We need a new curriculum – one centered on African languages, philosophies, history, and political economy. We must build schools that produce thinkers, builders, and liberators – not bureaucrats.

The African diaspora is another critical front. It contributes over $50 billion annually in remittances, but its political power remains underused. We need institutional pathways for diaspora participation – in elections, investment, security, and culture. From Sao Paulo to London, Atlanta to Kingston, the diaspora is not a spectator. It is a co-creator of Africa’s destiny.

Let us also talk about the ecological front. Africa is on the frontline of climate breakdown – but the solutions proposed often mask the same exploitation. Green capitalism – carbon markets, climate finance, offset schemes – lets polluters profit while Africa pays the price. We must fight for ecological justice rooted in land reform, water sovereignty, and indigenous stewardship – not donor agendas.

This is the real meaning of Africa Day in 2025. Not celebration. Mobilization. Not pageantry. Resistance.

The African Union must rise from dormancy or be bypassed by movements and governments that are willing to fight. Cultural organizations must reject NGO dependency and build spaces for radical imagination. Our youth must refuse the logic of escape and rebuild this continent with dignity. We need Pan-African banks, Pan-African education, Pan-African defense. And above all, we need truth.

[…]

Via https://www.rt.com/africa/618156-truth-behind-africa-day-2025/

Max’s Story: What Happens When Water Fluoridation Goes Wrong

by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.

When Utah lawmakers met during the legislative session to discuss and vote on whether to end the practice of fluoridating the state’s drinking water supply, 17-year-old Max Widmaier was there to offer key testimony.

2019, fifth-grader Max Widmaier was poisoned when a malfunctioning pump in Sandy, Utah, released undiluted hydrofluorosilicic acid into the water, affecting 1,500 households, institutions and businesses and sickening over 200 people. Turns out fluoridation accidents happen frequently, and the public is often the last to know.

An investigation revealed that fluoride was detected in the drinking water at 40 times the recommended levels, and officials failed to notify the public for 10 days.

Max unknowingly drank the over-fluoridated water in school. Soon after, he spiked a high fever, developed tics, had severe emotional swings, and experienced developmental regression so severe that at one point he lost the ability to compose sentences, his mother, Jenny Widmaier, told The Defender.

“I don’t remember fifth grade,” Max told Utah lawmakers. “That year is just a gaping hole where memory should be … because I drank the fluoridated water that day when Sandy City broke its line to public water.”

Jenny said that day, the school called her to pick Max up because he had a fever. She didn’t know if it was a virus, an infection, food poisoning or something else, so she asked Max about what he had been up to. Max mentioned that he drank water at school and it tasted metallic. At the time, Jenny didn’t give it a second thought.

After some severe gastrointestinal distress and about four days sick in bed, Max seemed fine, she said. The following Saturday, he hung out at a friend’s house, ate some tacos, and things seemed normal.

That night, Jenny’s husband, who came home late, checked in on Max before heading to bed. He immediately went to Jenny and asked, “What’s wrong with Max’s face?”

Jenny was surprised by the question. They went downstairs to examine Max together. “I was just watching him,” Jenny said, “and about every 30 to 45 seconds, his whole face would seize up and his head would drop, his chin would drop to his chest, and then he’d lift up and he was fine. He didn’t even notice it was happening.”

She asked Max what was going on with his face, but strangely, he had no idea what she was talking about. “It seemed he was blacking out,” Jenny said.

She called the emergency line for her pediatrician. They told her that if it happened while he was asleep, it could be serious, but that otherwise it was probably just a tic.

The “tic” seemed slightly better the following day, but Jenny took Max to the hospital to be evaluated. While they were there, the provider asked if they lived in Sandy City — which they didn’t.

When Jenny asked why it mattered if they lived in Sandy, the provider said there had been a fluoride leak there.

“Then it sort of clicked into place — the metallic tasting water, and his school is in Sandy,” Jenny said. The provider checked the map and saw that Max’s school was located in the fluoride leak zone. He told Jenny to get Max tested for heavy metals.

Water fluoridation comes with heavy metals

Jenny performed a home test on Max and it was positive for several metals, including chromium and lead. She kept him out of school the next day.

She said:

“At this point it was getting weird. He had reverted to being a 2-year-old. We took him to get some food, and he sat there and he had this little metal cow that he was using to make mooing noises.

“And his ability to put sentences together had declined dramatically. This is a kid who in fifth grade, was scoring high on what’s called the AMC 8 test, which is a mathematics test for eighth graders. And that day, he could hardly put words together into a sentence.”

The family struggled to find a place that could do the appropriate blood tests, although she did finally find an out-of-network provider. A neurologist told her it was late for a tic to present, but that Max probably just had tourette syndrome.

Max also experienced behavioral problems. He had panic attacks and would scream hysterically.

She reached out to the city for help, but got no response. Finally, through Facebook, she connected with Lorna Rosenstein, executive director of Waterwatch of Utah, who “was like my fairy godmother.”

Rosenstein, who had been active in attempting to end water fluoridation in Utah for years, connected Jenny with fluoride toxicity expert Phyllis Mullenix, Ph.D., who helped develop a treatment plan for Max so his body could eliminate the toxic levels of fluoride from his system.

In addition to a very strict diet, Max had to undergo several rounds of chelation therapy because he also had high levels of lead, arsenic and cadmium in his blood.

Most members of the public are not aware that heavy metals are present in the hydrofluorosilicic acid — a byproduct of the phosphate fertilizer production process — typically used to fluoridate water.

Max also had to do neurological exercises to retrain his brain. As the fluoride was eliminated from his system, his mental health also returned to normal.

None of the treatments were covered by insurance, Jenny said. The family never received any compensation from the city. The school, however, was very responsive. Jenny said they immediately turned off the water fountains and now provide filtered water for all students.

‘I have horrible balance and my sense of body is all screwed up’ 

“It took us about a year to recover him back to normal,” Jenny said. Max no longer has a tic unless he consumes food or drink with fluoride in it. “I can always tell almost immediately when he has eaten rice that’s been cooked in water, it’s not been filtered because he starts to twitch and his face starts to seize.”

Max told The Defender that his only memories of the entire year-long experience were of getting strange soreness at the edge of his eyes. He said he would blink to make it go away. Those were the blackouts.

When Max accidentally consumes something with fluoride in it today — now more than five years later — he experiences that same feeling and has to blink.

He also continues to have shaky hands. “My handwriting is horrible,” he said, so he uses heavy pens to counter the shaking. “I have horrible balance and my sense of body is all screwed up.”

Intellectually, he said, he feels fully recovered.

Max said he was glad to be able to tell his story to the legislators. “It was an acknowledgement,” he said. “It was like, ‘man what this kid went through is unfortunate’ from people on both sides of the water fluoridation debate.”

Max said he hopes his story raises the question for people about whether adding fluoride to water is worth the risk. “Sure, you can brush your teeth with a fluoride toothpaste or drink fluoridated water, but how much goes to your teeth and how much ends up elsewhere?”

“And there can be some freak accident. Is that a risk you are willing to take?”

Water fluoridation accidents occur frequently — but public often last to know

The 2019 accident in Sandy City was just one of many accidental fluoride spills and overfeeds that happen regularly, according to the Fluoride Action Network, which tracks publicly recorded accidents on a webpage.

Accidents range from a small, 10-gallon spill in 2012 in Connecticut to an incident in New Orleans in 2008, where the fluorosilicic acid ate through its storage tanks and then through a concrete containment tank.

In that case, to avoid a “catastrophic mix of toxic chemicals,” the environment department discharged nearly half a million gallons of the toxic acid into the Mississippi River.

Failure to warn the public about fluoride accidents is also common.

Last month in Richmond, Virginia, an accidental fluoride overfeed caused a discharge of approximately 5,900 gallons of fluoride solution into the drinking water. The city said the previous fluoride system had failed in January, and the recent leak occurred during the installation of a new pump.

The leak began on April 23. However, it wasn’t until April 27 — when a Richmond Water Treatment Plant employee called a state agency to report the overflow and said no one was taking action to address the problem — that any state officials even knew about the spill, 6 News Richmond reported.

The City of Richmond had not notified the Virginia Department of Health, neighboring counties or the public.

Officials said the short-term exposure didn’t cause a public health concern. However, that assertion was based on the claim that, “Fluoride levels detected at the Water Treatment Plant were 2.67 milligrams per liter (mg/L) which is below the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 4.0 mg/L, the highest level that is allowed in drinking water by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),” the city’s press release said. “The optimal target level of fluoride is 0.7 mg/L.”

While that may be technically true, last year, plaintiffs who sued the EPA alleging fluoride causes damage at levels far below 4.0 mg/L won their case.

A federal judge ordered the EPA to initiate a process to regulate the chemical, finding that it poses an “unreasonable risk” to children’s health even at the recommended 0.7 mg/L levels.

The 2.67 mg/L is several orders of magnitude higher than the level at which exposure for children becomes risky, even though it is under the legal limit, and that limit must now be changed.

The city’s press release warned that children under age 9 could be at risk of dental fluorosis — a tooth discoloration — from the leak and should be provided with an alternative water option.

It did not mention any of the recent research that has been making headlines for the last year, showing that ingesting fluoride is linked to reduced IQ, behavioral issues, disruption of thyroid functioning and the gut microbiome in children.

Nor did it mention the risks to pregnant women.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/maxs-story-water-fluoridation-utah-lawmakers/

Nightmare of Jerusalem Part VIII – The Mossad Role in Irangate and Creation of ISIS

Nightmare of Jerusalem Part VII

Press TV (2025)

Film Review

This final episode mainly covers Irangate, a scandalous Reagan administration program (1981-86) that secretly sold weapons to a sworn US enemy (Iran) to fund the Contra war against Nicaragua; the relentless Hezbollah attacks on Israeli occupiers that forced the IDF to withdraw from Lebanon in 2000; Israel’s more recent attacks on Iran’s nuclear program; and their role (with the CIA) in creating Daesh (ISIS) to undermine Arabic sovereignty and unity in the Middle East.

Yaakov Nimrodi, the Israeli arms broker who provided the 45,000 Uzis the US sold Iran, was a long time Mossad agent Yaakov Nimrodi stationed mainly in Iran. His son Ofer was born in Iran.

Concerned about the risk of Iran developing nuclear weapons, since 2000, Israel has assassinated five Iranian nuclear scientists. It also tried to infect Iran’s nuclear power plant with Stuxnet malware. According to Edward Snowden, the Mossad and US intelligence jointly developed Stuxnet. Fortunately Iranian security specialists managed to isolate and destroy it before it infected Iran’s nuclear power plant.

The filmmakers also note the Mossad and CIA role in creating Daesh. They find it significant that Daesh terrorists have never once attacked Israeli forces, also that injured Daesh members seek treatment in Israelli hospitals if they become injured.

https://www.presstv.ir/doc/Detail/2025/04/09/745850/Nightmare-of-Jerusalem-Israel-Iran-PressTV-Documentary

How the Covid-19 Vaccine Programme Has Crippled Our Health System

NZDSOS

The covid-19 vaccination programme has impacted the New Zealand healthcare system in three significant ways:

Tsunami of increased healthcare burden: There has been a substantial rise in patients presenting with conditions linked to vaccine injuries, creating an overwhelming strain on an already stressed system. This includes an emerging epidemic of cancer (particularly in young people), heart conditions, autoimmune diseases, neurological issues, and other chronic illness.Loss of healthcare professionals: The vaccine mandates led to the departure of experienced medical professionals who chose to maintain their bodily autonomy, exacerbating critical staffing shortages.Healthcare workforce illness: Many healthcare professionals who received the vaccine have themselves experienced adverse effects or illness, further reducing our workforce capacity.

These voices have been systematically silenced in mainstream discourse, yet they represent a crucial perspective in any honest assessment of our healthcare system.

[…]

Via https://nzdsos.com/2025/04/29/elephant-in-the-room-at-the-hikoi-for-health/