Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 591
March 13, 2022
US Tried Opening a Biolab in Crimea Before It Rejoined Russia in 2014
State Centre for Research on Virology and Technology in Novorsibirsk Oblast
Documents found at a Soviet-era lab in Simferopol expose US’ plans for biological weapon development in Crimea.
Georgy Muradov, the permanent representative of the Republic of Crimea, revealed that Washington tried to open a biological laboratory in Simferopol, Crimea, before the region joined Russia.
“Biological weapons have been developed for years in the Pentagon’s secret laboratories located on Ukrainian territory. This is no news for Crimean residents, given that the US [previously] planned to create the same lab on the peninsula. Only the reunification of Crimea with Russia in March 2014 stopped the implementation of the plans to create pathogens on Crimean territory”, Muradov stated.
Members of the consumer protection watchdog, Rospotrebnadzor, spotted a former Soviet plague control station in Simferopol, finding 104 pools of ectoparasites, 46 samples of internal organs of rodents, and 105 samples of human blood serum, which were going to be delivered overseas.
The employees discovered documents at the station which revealed that “Americans were going to open their bio laboratory in Simferopol [Crimea’s second-largest city and the republic’s political and economic centre].”
The recent findings affirm Russia’s claims that Ukraine “was turning into a springboard for potential aggression against [Russia] our country, including with the help of conducting ‘covert biological warfare’.”
The Russian Ministry of Defense announced on Thursday that the bio labs in Ukraine, which Washington has recently admitted to funding, had experiments conducted with bat coronavirus samples.
Moscow has recently requested that the UN Security Council hold an emergency meeting to discuss the suspected manufacturing of biological weapons in Ukraine. Russia’s UN ambassador, Vassily Nebenzia, called on the member states to think about the biological danger to Europe, which can result from an uncontrolled spread of bioagents from Ukraine.
Read more: US-made biolabs in Ukraine complicit in deadly pathogens transfer
On Thursday, Russian Defense Ministry Spokesperson Maj. Gen. Igor Konashenkov said Russian military specialists obtained documents confirming the transfer of human biomaterials taken in Ukraine to foreign countries on Washington’s instructions.
Konashenkov said “according to the documents, the American side planned to conduct work on pathogens of birds, bats, and reptiles in Ukraine in 2022, with a further transition to studying the possibility of carrying African swine fever and anthrax“.
Russian specialists from the nuclear, biological, and chemical protection troops studied documents on the transfer of human biomaterials taken in Ukraine to foreign countries, upon a US request, Konashenkov told reporters.
“In the near future, we will publish the next package of documents received from Ukrainian employees of biological laboratories and present the results of their examination,” he said.
Moreover, the United States is concerned that the Russian forces will reach the labs, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland said Tuesday, as the Russian forces make further advances into Ukraine ahead of their ceasefire.
Read more: US fears being accused of violating Biological Weapons Convention
“Ukraine has biological research facilities, which, in fact, we are now quite concerned Russian forces may be seeking to gain control of,” Nuland said during a Senate hearing.
According to the Under Secretary, Washington is working with Kiev on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces “should they approach”.
Russia asks for a meeting of UN Security Council on 11 March to discuss the military biological activities of the US on the territory of #Ukraine – Russian Mission to the UN https://t.co/3MsbwTvC1f
— Dilyana Gaytandzhieva (@dgaytandzhieva) March 10, 2022
[…]
The Legacies of the Southern Saga
Episode 24: The Legacies of the Southern Saga
A New History of the American South
Dr Edward Ayers (2018)
Film Review
As Ayers states in this final lecture, the main purpose of his course A New History of the American South is to dispel erroneous generalizations and stereotypes that trivialize the South.
He begins by describing the gradual integration of southern culture into overall US culture that began in the 1880s and 1890s. In his view, this was most evident in the embrace of sports as the symbol of everything wholesome and nourishing in modern American life.
First learning about baseball during the Civil War, southerners took it home with them as the war ended. The football craze, in contrast, began after the war in northern universities and spread first to southern universities and later to southern high schools. By 1900 college football had become a major southern institution.
in 1908, the son of former slaves Jack Johnson became the world heavy weight boxing champion.
Growing numbers of Black college graduates also facilitated the integration of northern and southern culture. One African graduate, Booker T Washington, supported what he called “the Atlantic Compromise.” From his perspective, free Black men had a better chance of achieving equality by starting successful southern business than by agitating for social equality. To his credit, Washington openly attacked racial segregation of the railroads and encouraged boycotts of segregated southern streetcars.
In 1897 the Supreme Court ruled that segregation was legal so long as Black people had access to equal facilities.
According to Ayers, the Spanish-American War provided the best opportunity to reconcile North-South differences. Washington himself committed to recruiting 10,000 Black soldiers for the war (arguing this was the best opportunity demonstrate their patriotism and right to legal equality). Other African American scholars argued Blacks were better served by fighting for equality at home.
Meanwhile the Cult of the Lost Cause opposed every aspect of life in the “New South.” By 1889, around one-third of former Confederate soldiers belonged to United Confederate Veterans. In 1895, the United Daughters of the Confederacy formed to celebrate Decoration Day (by visiting Confederate tombs – see The Incredible Tragedy of the Civil War) and raise funds for Confederate monuments.*
Similar organizations formed in the North: the Daughters of the American Revolution** in 1890 and the Grand Army of the Republic (originally formed in 1866, its membership included half of all Union veterans by the 1890s). Ayers attributes the rise of similar organizations in both North and South to the Gilded Age (1870-1900), a period in which roughly six million Americans belonged to roughly 200 social clubs and organizations.
*Which, according to Ayers, was a profitable growth industry prior to the recent monuments controversy.
**The DAR is a lineage-based membership service organization for women who are directly descended from personnel involved in the US War of Independence.
March 12, 2022
Media incitement and resulting police brutality demand public enquiry
There are reliable reports that around 1700 official complaints have been recorded by the Police Complaints Bureau. Surely this unprecedented number must of its own accord provoke an official enquiry.
A shocking confession from a police detective who volunteered to remove the anti-mandate protesters from parliament raises questions that should be answered by public enquiry (or even Royal Commission).
The confession provides a stark picture of the mindset of police involved in the clearing operation. It also raises questions about the mainstream media’s role in promoting an entirely false narrative concerning the protests. Thereby inciting hatred and encouraging disinformed (and gullible) police to commit acts of brutality towards the protesters.
Below is the insanely bigoted and prejudiced comment from the unnamed police detective, who volunteered for the operation after responding to incentives such as five star accommodation and bonuses. Incentives that suggest among more wise elements of police staffing, there was a sensible reluctance to participate. The unnamed detective made the statement in a mainstream media interview published today. He said-
“I was angry we were being treated like…
View original post 748 more words
Stop the Power Grab: An Open Letter on the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty
WCH partners, from Australia to Zimbabwe, stand against this costly abuse of power and assert the sovereign right of people to make their own decisions, over and above what their representatives may want. We urge everyone to approach credible government representatives, political parties, trade unions, civil society groups, professionals, public figures, and independent media.
BYRHODA WILSONONMARCH 11, 2022•
L
The World Council for Health (“WCH”), a coalition of scientists, doctors, lawyers, and civil society advocacy organisations, opposes the World Health Organisation (“WHO”)’s moves to implement a power grab in the form ofa global pandemic agreement, while the world’s attention is diverted by the latest crisis.
The proposed WHO agreement is unnecessary, and is a threat to sovereignty and inalienable rights. It increases the WHO’ssuffocating powerto declare unjustified pandemics, impose dehumanising lockdowns, and enforce expensive, unsafe, and ineffective treatments against the will of the people.
The WHO cannot be allowed to control the world’s health agenda, nor enforce bio-surveillance. While it receives funding from public sources belonging to the people, it is caught in a perpetual conflict of interest because it also receives substantial funding from private interests that use their contributions to influence and profit from…
View original post 334 more words
FOOD RIOTS of 2022 have already begun-new intel on scarcity of food, minerals, telecom equipment, et al
NWO Report
(Natural News) Food riots have already begun in Iraq (Al Jazeera). Lebanon has announced the rationing of wheat (Irish Times). Ukraine has halted all exports of most grains, while Russia has halted exports of fertilizer and many sources of natural gas.
The world is being plunged into an engineered global starvation scenario, and in North America, we only have a few months of abundant food still in the supply line.
Agricultural experts have told me the May and June crop yield reports for 2022 will be “catastrophic.” By July, it will become obvious to even the deniers that food availability — even in America — is severely hampered. Empty shelves will plague US grocery retailers throughout the second half of this year.
Yesterday on the Alex Jones Show, I predicted that 1-2 billion people on planet Earth will face the risk of starvation by the end of this year. Without fossil fuel-based fertilizers, 4 billion people would die (about half the current population).
Get ready for food rationing passports and armed guards at grocery storesAs I explain in my HRR podcast below, this crisis will lead to:
Robberies and flash mob looting of grocery stores.Grocery stores responding by beefing up security with armed guard and security checkpoints.Government initiating food rationing passports that will eventually be tied to central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).In other words, tyrannical governments are going to use this engineered crisis to force people into CBDCs and food rationing control systems. If you want to eat, you will be forced to use their digital wallet system, where they have total surveillance and control over your spending behavior.
TRENDING: Kamala Laughs Hysterically After Questions About Ukraine Refugee CrisisOh, and by the way, they will collapse the dollar during all this in order to exacerbate the panic and destroy whatever assets people are foolishly keeping in dollars.
This is all covered in the 56-minute Situation Update at the bottom of this article.
Intel on scarcity of ammo, satellite phones, bulk food supplies and moreI’ve also posted a 20-minute intel update based on information received from an ammunition retailer, a satellite phone retailer, and our own direct experience attempting to purchase bulk food resources by the pallet (many thousands of pounds at a time):
All satellite phones are blown out of inventory, across the world, and now sat phones that once cost just $900 are fetching $3500 on the open market.Ammunition sales have spiked 166% according to one prominent retailer, following the Feb 24th Russian action on Ukraine.The future supply of sat phones will see at least a 40% increase in price due to supply chain demand and disruptions. There are currently waiting lists to receive sat phones toward the end of April.Food commodities used in the preparedness food industry are skyrocketing in price while supply is heavily strained. The supply hasn’t yet collapsed, as we still have a few months’ buffer of raw materials in the pipeline, but we expect catastrophic shortages to begin this summer.[…]
US Officials Meet Maduro, Fail to Drive Wedge Between Venezuela and Russia
Mexico City, Mexico – A high-level United States (US) government delegation that visited Venezuela on Saturday failed to produce an agreement with the government of Nicolás Maduro.
News of the delegation was first broken by the New York Times, which described the trip as the highest-level visit by US officials in years. Outlets subsequently reported that no agreement was reached. Caracas had not publicly commented on the meeting at the time of writing.
According to Reuters, the US team was led by White House Latin America adviser Juan González and made “maximalist” demands concerning electoral guarantees. Citing three people familiar with the matter, Reuters reported that the US was seeking new presidential elections, a larger participation of foreign private capital in Venezuela’s oil industry and a public condemnation of Russia’s incursion into Ukraine. The Biden administration representatives reportedly offered Venezuela a temporary return to the SWIFT financial transaction system.
Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and Vice President Delcy Rodríguez, who directly participated in the meeting, instead demanded broader sanctions relief and the return of foreign assets such as oil subsidiary CITGO. US officials reportedly brought up the cases of US citizens jailed in Venezuela, including six oil executives imprisoned for corruption and two former Green Berets who took part in a failed coup effort.
The meeting in Caracas was the latest US effort to isolate Russian President Vladimir Putin from his allies in the region. US officials told the Times that Washington views Russia’s Latin American allies as a potential “security threat” should the tensions continue to escalate in light of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, which has ratcheted up conflict between the US and Russia.
Venezuela broke off diplomatic relations with the US in 2019 after the latter recognized opposition figure Juan Guaidó as “interim president.” The US and its allies refused to recognize the results of the 2018 election that saw Maduro reelected to a six-year term. Washington then proceeded to engage in and support a series of unsuccessful coup plots, ultimately failing to oust Maduro from power.
US strategy toward Venezuela has more recently been focused on isolating Maduro, imposing crippling sanctions on the country’s energy sector and seizing, together with its allies, the country’s assets abroad. In public statements, the Biden administration has expressed its unwillingness to seriously negotiate with Caracas absent new elections.
Nonetheless, due to the failure of the US to successfully install Guaidó as an authority with any real power inside Venezuela, Caracas and Washington have maintained back-channel communications despite the lack of formal diplomatic relations. Guaidó, despite being recognized by the US as the country’s president, was only informed of the high-level delegation the morning of the meeting.
Venezuelan geopolitical analyst Sergio Rodríguez Gelfenstein told Venezuelanalysis that the leak of the news of the visit of senior US officials was motivated by an effort to drive a wedge between Caracas and Moscow and leave the impression that there was a “chill” in relations between the two countries.
Rodríguez maintained that Washington and Caracas would nonetheless leave the door open to dialogue.
“I believe that there will be continued attempts at rapprochement, especially because the Mexican [dialogue between the Venezuelan government and the opposition] was exhausted,” he said. “The Mexico talks were totally absurd since the opposition was being directed from within the United States, any step they took had to be consulted with Washington. In that sense it is much more feasible for the United States to negotiate directly with Venezuela.”
President Maduro has repeatedly expressed a willingness to negotiate an end to US-led sanctions on the country. The lack of a deal stemming from the visit by the senior-level delegation suggests Venezuela did not find it to be a workable proposal. Reuters reported that US officials agreed to a follow-up meeting.
It would take a considerable reversal of US policy toward the Caribbean nation to get the country to walk away from its Russian ally. Relations between the two countries have only grown in light of US efforts to isolate Caracas. Russian assistance has played an important role in Venezuela’s efforts to attend to the economic crisis in the country, providing support and expertise to the country’s key industries as well as steady investment in Venezuela’s energy sector.
Venezuela likewise recently strengthened its ties with Russia following a visit by Russian Deputy Prime Minister Yuri Borisov in February.
Caracas has called for a “peaceful resolution” to the ongoing crisis in Ukraine but has stopped short of condemning the Russian military operation. Venezuela did not vote in the United Nations (UN) General Assembly’s resolution concerning the Russian offensive in Ukraine. The country’s voting rights have been suspended as a result of unpaid UN membership dues due the impact of sanctions.
[…]
March 11, 2022
Lawmakers Push Legislation to Protect Doctors Who Prescribe Ivermectin for COVID
Adrianna Rodriguez
USA Today via Yahoo News
Dozens of state lawmakers push bills that would make it easier for doctors to prescribe ivermectin for COVID-19, even though the anti-parasitic has not been proved effective at preventing or treating the disease.
As of Thursday, at least 26 states have proposed or passed legislation that would increase patient access to the drug, according to a database created by the Federation of State Medical Boards.
Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, chair of the department of medical ethics and health policy at the University of Pennsylvania’s Perelman School of Medicine, said the bills “drive (him) nuts.”
“It’s just a serious intrusion into medical practice by people who aren’t doctors and don’t know medical practice,” Emanuel told USA TODAY. “It’s inevitable someone’s going to be harmed, and this is harmful to the country.”
Most of the bills attempt to protect doctors who prescribe ivermectin for COVID-19 against disciplinary action from state medical boards and hospitals. The Federation of State Medical Boards said in a statement sent to USA TODAY it opposes any legislation intended to limit a state board’s ability to protect patients.
“It sets a dangerous precedent and puts the public at risk,” the federation said. “State legislatures are encouraged to work with their state medical boards to uphold existing statutory authority to respond to complaints about the quality of care provided and take disciplinary action against physicians when necessary to protect the public.”
Other proposed bills seek to make ivermectin available over the counter or by standing order, prohibit pharmacists from refusing to refill ivermectin prescriptions or prohibit medical professionals from providing information that would discourage patients from taking ivermectin for COVID-19.
Via https://www.yahoo.com/now/lawmakers-push-legislation-protect-doctors-100209546.html
Chart: How Russia’s Ultra-Wealthy Eclipse Their Country’s Economy | Statista
The U.S. also exhibited an extraordinarily high billionaire wealth at between 14-15 percent of GDP. But despite the fact that the United States is home to around 35 percent of all the billionaires listed on the Bloomberg index, including the top 9 individuals with net worths between $95 billion and $221 billion, Russian billionaires are still richer in comparison to their country’s economic output.
According to The Economist, approximately 85 percent of Russian billionaire wealth can be attributed to the so-called crony sector, where business and political power players work together to share profits and favors. Russian President Vladimir Putin has been known to use this class of the loyal and influential to cement his power for years. Out of the country’s richest mentioned on the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, Gennady Timchenko of investment firm Volga Group appeares on the UK sanctions list, while Petr Aven of ABH Holdings, Mikhail Fridman of Alfa Group and Alisher Usmanov of Metalloinvest are being sanctioned by the EU.
The U.S. also exhibited an extraordinarily high billionaire wealth at between 14-15 percent of GDP. But despite the fact that the United States is home to around 35 percent of all the billionaires listed on the Bloomberg index, including the top 9 individuals with net worths between $95 billion and…
View original post 123 more words
Despite Plummeting Cases, Fourth Jab on the Way?
As the conflict unfolds in Ukraine, you’ll notice how swiftly the media is pivoting all our attention onto war and Eastern Europe – just forget about COVID and all the harm that ill-advised pandemic policies have caused citizens. (Remember the Johns Hopkins study which found that lockdowns “have had little to no public health effects” but have “imposed enormous economic and social costs”?)
But many of us will NOT forget – we who have watched our loved ones suffer from the extreme impacts of mandates, socially-acceptable discrimination, job loss, and of course, COVID-19 itself (for which Big Pharma strongly suppressed early and innovative treatments). And we will be watching carefully as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other agencies continue to push for more and more COVID shots … including what might turn out to be a yearly booster shot.
“Follow the Science” or Do They Just Mean Follow the Agenda? FDA Reportedly Looking Forward to Annual COVID ShotsCiting the Wall Street Journal, the United Kingdom’s Daily Mail recently reported that the FDA has laid out possible plans to recommend yet another COVID shot dose for the general public within the next few weeks. Allegedly, the government agency may even end up recommending an annual “booster” shot for most people.
This is despite the fact that local and state officials around the country are dropping vax and mask mandates like hot potatoes and that COVID cases in the U.S. have plummeted by nearly 90% since a mid-January 2022 surge and nearly 50% within just the past few weeks.
In the United States (and certain other countries, like Israel), a fourth dose of the mRNA COVID shot from either Pfizer or Moderna is already available and recommended for some Americans. As the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) note on their website, anyone aged “12 years and older who are moderately or severely immunocompromised should receive a total of 4 doses of COVID-19 vaccine.”
That’s four doses of a novel gene therapeutic in under a year, at least for some individuals (and possibly most individuals soon enough). Remember, this is a drug that:
Was originally sold to the public as the “only way to end the pandemic” and the best way to prevent transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that supposedly causes COVID-19Was quickly found to NOT stop transmission, but (at best) reduce the risk of severe disease, hospitalization, and death from COVID-19 – all of which are extremely unlikely, to begin with for the VAST majority of peopleHas yet to amass any long-term safety data and has triggered a meteoric rise in adverse event reporting to the official U.S. vax safety surveillance systemThis is also a drug that has been shrouded in secrecy by the very agencies tasked with researching its effectiveness and safety.
More and more doses – despite lack of transparency about shot safety evidence
A genuine question: have ANY COVID shot recipients been able to provide true informed consent to their first, second, third, and perhaps fourth dose? We ask this, knowing that the CDC now admits to withholding COVID shot data in fear that it will lead to “misinformation.”
One has to wonder: what does this information contain, exactly? Wouldn’t the public deserve to get as much official information as quickly as possible to make informed decisions about their personal health?
Wouldn’t the public also want to know, for example, that the CDC recently found that booster shots are not beneficial for people between the ages of 18 and 49? Moreover, wouldn’t this information be of the utmost importance to the small but growing number of hospital systems around the United States mandating booster shots for their employees?
Bottom line: why mandate a drug that has not been shown to be helpful? I thought we were supposed to “follow the science.”
[…]
After 33 Years of Failure to Produce Any Vaccine Novavax Targets Children for COVID-19 Vaccine
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Ben Adams of FiercePharma, the marketing trade publication for the pharmaceutical industry, just published an article today announcing that Novavax has unveiled a new “education campaign” for its COVID-19 vaccine that is expected to get an EUA (emergency use authorization) from the FDA soon.
[…]
In reading this press release at FiercePharma today, I found it rather remarkable that they are admitting that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are actually dangerous for children, something the FDA and CDC refuse to acknowledge, as they position Novavax as a better alternative for children.
Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson were quickest off the mark in getting COVID vaccines into American arms, but Novavax is hoping to add another pandemic vaccine to the U.S. mix soon—and it’s pushing new campaigns to get the word out.
The biopharma, which has approvals and authorizations in Europe and around the world, is now on the cusp of a potential green light in the U.S. And with a market comes the need for marketing.
But because it still has no U.S. approval—and it cannot under law advertise to consumers in Europe—Novavax is launching two new global, unbranded vaccine education programs: “We Do Vaccines” and “Know Our Vax.” They’re designed to offer up vaccine information and “explain Novavax’ commitment to vaccine development and innovation,” the company told Fierce Pharma Marketing.
The main message of the campaign is that “people have options when it comes to their vaccine,” Silvia Taylor, senior vice president of global corporate affairs at Novavax, said in an interview. “We want people to understand that we have this vaccine, and that this vaccine is different.”
Novavax knows it has some tough competition—Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccines dominate the U.S. market—but the small biotech is eyeing certain market niches: The “vaccine hesitant” who might be leery of the brand-new mRNA tech in Pfizer and Moderna’s shots, and children.
The vaccine contains a version of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein made in the lab as well as an adjuvant, which is a booster ingredient designed to strengthen immune responses to the vaccine.
Novavax is also targeting the pediatric population. There are questions about how well mRNA vaccines work in younger children. There are also safety concerns, notably the rates of myocarditis in young and adolescent boys, who appear to be more at risk from this condition, which can cause dangerous inflammation of the heart.
Taylor believes Nuvaxovid can be a safe and efficacious second choice for children and adolescents outside of mRNA. (Full article.)
I had been led to believe in the past that Novavax was a new company that had never produced a single vaccine, but I dug a bit deeper today and learned that they have actually been around for over 33 years, and have had multiple failures in trying to produce any vaccine at all in the past.
I found an article that was published in some UK publications earlier this month, and here is one that is not behind a paywall:
Novavax closes in on Covid triumph after 33 years of failureLess than a year before the Covid-19 pandemic ravaged the world, Novavax was facing delisting from the Nasdaq. The pharmaceutical company had poured hundreds of millions of dollars into research and development for vaccines — and yet, at 33 years old, was approaching middle age without a single approved shot.
[…]
So how does a company with a 33-year track record of failure, even after receiving an $89 million research grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in 2015, and then another $384 million from the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations in 2020, which is also funded by Bill Gates, get to the point where it introduces its first vaccine for the COVID-19 “virus”?
The same way that Pfizer and Moderna were able to introduce an mRNA vaccine into the market after decades of failing to get an mRNA vaccine approved for HIV/AIDS:
Have President Trump’s administration declare a “pandemic” so that the FDA can start handing out EUAs to Big Pharma to resurrect these old vaccines that could never pass FDA approval without an EUA, and then give them a boatload of money to make it happen.
And that’s what happened in July of 2020 when Trump’s Operation Warp Speed gave Novavax $1.6 BILLION, even though they had failed to produce a single vaccine for over 30 years.
Donald Trump was simply the puppet politician that rubber stamped all this, of course, as the real people who made all this happen were the Wall Street Mega Banks, led by Jamie Dimon and JPMorgan Chase, who bailed themselves out at the end of 2019 to create the cash that was going to be needed to do all this.
[…]
These investment firms, led by Vanguard and Blackrock, will now probably just sell most of their stocks in Pfizer, if they haven’t already, and simply move over to Novavax.
Here’s who owns Novavax according to the Wall Street Journal:
And why not? This playbook worked so well for Pfizer, raking in record profits, why not do it again for another company that cannot produce a vaccine that would pass FDA standards, by issuing an EUA and then targeting the population that has yet to get a COVID-19 vaccine, the “vaccine hesitant” and children.
Apparently, Novavax has a wide appeal for the ignorant masses who are being targeted by this new “educational program” who are eagerly awaiting Novavax to be given an EUA by the FDA so they can rush out and get it.
[…]
Just to let people know I’m moving to Substack and Telegram after several readers informed me I’ve been censored from WordPress Reader feed. The link to my Substack account is https://stuartbramhall.substack.com/. The link to my Telegram channel is https://t.me/themostrevolutionaryact I’ll continue to publish on WordPress as long as I’m able, but if my blog suddenly disappears you’ll know where to find me.
The Most Revolutionary Act
- Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's profile
- 11 followers
