Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 571

Russia’s Gazprom HALTS gas flows to Poland and Germany: rolling blackouts inevitable unless Europe finds RUBLES

NWO Report

(Natural News) In the bombshell news of the week, Russia’s Gazprom natural gas exporter, exactly has promised, is shutting off gas flows to nations whose gas importers refuse to pay for gas in Rubles.

Gas flows for Poland and Germany are halted as of today, confirmed by Bloomberg and other outlets. Poland’s officials are currently in a state of hilarious denial, claiming they have enough “reserves” to keep gas flowing into “homes,” but utterly failing to mention there won’t be enough gas to power the electricity generation hubs or industrial customers that keep the country’s economy flowing.

TRENDING: You Can’t Have a Functioning Nation without Free Speech

The situation is even more dire in Germany, where officials there have agreed to export “tanks” to Russia, even though they aren’t even really tanks. As I posted on Telegram earlier today: https://t.me/RealHealthRanger/1690

Germany’s “tanks” that are being donated to Ukraine are nothing more than STEEL COFFINS for Ukrainian soldiers. First off, these aren’t tanks at all. They are tracked, short-range anti-air systems that NOBODY in Ukraine even knows how to operate. Via previous post, TRAINING time to run these is 6-12 months. There will be NO spare parts if they are damaged. NOBODY in Ukraine knows how to repair these units. It’s all a hilarious, pathetic JOKE on the part of Germany. Dragged out of a museum!

It appears that Germany is emptying its war museums of old hardware while demanding Russia keep selling it gas in euros, even though Germany and other Western nations have declared Russia can no longer use euros or dollar, due to the extreme economic sanctions leveled against Russia (by the West).

These bully tactics of the West are turning out to be disastrously catastrophic for Western nations, and Germany faces the near-total annihilation of its industrial base if it can’t somehow replace Russia’s natural gas deliveries (or find a way to pay in Rubles). The collapse of German industry will take a generation to recover, if ever, since shutting down manufacturing businesses and liquidating their assets usually involves selling off hardware and losing the human knowledge base of how to run that hardware.

All this for virtue signaling against Russia, it seems. Germany would rather commit economic suicide than allow Russia to earn another Ruble in revenue for its gas exports. Not that Russia is desperate for revenues, of course, since Russian energy sales are booming and year-over-year revenues for Russia are exploding to the upside due to sharply rising energy prices on the global market. China, Turkey, India and most other nations around the world are happy to keep buying energy from Russia, even if Germany, Poland, the UK and the USA refuse to do so.

Ukraine is Europe’s graveyard for outdated military hardware… and the Ukrainian soldiers are paying with their lives

The reality of this sad, pathetic tactic by NATO nations is that Ukraine has become a dumping ground (or graveyard) for outdated, nearly museum-era military hardware that NATO nations are desperately trying to get rid of while claiming to be “assisting” Ukraine.

– Poland is delivering an unknown quantity of some sort of tanks Ukraine
– Germany is delivering museum-era anti-aircraft tracked vehicles Ukraine
– The Czech Republic is delivering some outdated T-72 tanks
– UK is sending Stormer armored vehicles with anti-aircraft missiles
– Slovenia is also reportedly sending some T-72 tanks

What they’re actually accomplishing is the mass death of Ukrainian soldiers who will die in these steel coffins, given all the following undeniable truths:

Ukrainian military forces have almost zero training in these oddball pieces of equipment, except perhaps the T-72s.There are virtually no repair parts available to keep these things running, since they largely aren’t in production anymore.There’s very little ammo available for the hardware, and ammo is almost impossible to deliver to the battle lines due to Russia’s railway interdiction efforts.There’s no interoperability between all this oddball hardware coming from different nations, different eras, different manufacturers, etc. They don’t use the same parts, their comms are all set up differently, their maintenance requirements are not unified, their tracks are not interchangeable, etc. It’s all a pathetic joke.Many of these pieces of equipment have sat in warehouses for years or decades, experiencing internal engine rust (from water accumulation in diesel engines) and component rust. It’s questionable whether these vehicles will even survive the first 30 days of actual use without breaking down and becoming multi-ton paper weights.

While some of the T-72s might be useful in defensive positions, the bulk of this hardware is nothing but a turkey shoot for modern Russian aircraft, missile systems and well-equipped battlefield tanks.

Yet libtards in America — people who are stupid enough to believe the corporate media — think “Ukraine is winning!” Even when the power grid is about to experience rolling blackouts across Poland and Germany, with diesel shortages in the UK and food shelves starting to go bare across most of Western Europe.

How, exactly, is NATO winning again? Russia is seizing territory, raking in record revenues for energy exports and experiencing huge support for its national currency, all while the dollar continues to erode and the Japanese yen is on the verge of a total collapse.

[…]

Via https://nworeport.me/2022/04/28/russias-gazprom-halts-gas-flows-to-poland-and-germany-europe-in-panic-as-rolling-blackouts-are-inevitable-unless-europe-finds-rubles/

An Open Letter to Elon Musk

Image by mohamed Hassan from Pixabay

Abir Ballan, for PanData.org

Offguardian

Dear Elon,

Congratulations on the acquisition of Twitter. We hope this will help put the world on track to be a better place.

You stated that “Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated…”

We hope this is a promise to uphold the right to free speech and peaceful assembly on Twitter- both essential components of the democratic process.

We hope that the dark days of witch-hunting and book-burning are behind us.

Human nature is not always at its best. Deception is normal. Corruption is normal. Greed for money, power and fame is normal. This is human nature. What is not normal is for society to accept the removal of the mechanism of error correction. We believe that with free speech, errors can be corrected and wrong-doers can be held accountable.

Since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, authority figures have spread false information unhindered. The fact of the matter is that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is not so novel and not as deadly to the general population as has been portrayed.

The asymptomatic spread theory was a fear-mongering tool used to subdue the population. The unconstitutional mandates of lockdowns, masks, social distancing, testing and contact tracing, and mass vaccination were all ineffective in the management of this airborne virus and caused great harm to society.

Those who dared to speak out against them were silenced and falsely accused of ‘misinformation’ while the public fell victim to relentless propaganda. The absurdity of these suppressions lies in the fact that much of what was regarded as ‘misinformation’ a year ago – is now accepted as truth by those who encouraged such sanctions.

Throughout history, the wrong-doers were never those who spoke their truth at great personal cost. The wrong-doers were always those motivated to suppress the truth. What do they have to hide? What do they have to gain? How long should they be allowed to walk free without being questioned?

We look forward to the changes you plan to implement on Twitter and ask you to consider adding the following points to your first board meeting agenda:

#ReinstateTheVoices#NoMoreShadowBanning#PutALeashOnTheMinistryOfTruthDiscuss the new features, open source algorithms, spam botsClarify to the public your position on “authenticating all humans”. Does this merely refer to eliminating bots or does it include eliminating the possibility of anonymity? Historically, many injustices have been revealed by anonymous whistleblowers.

PANDA is committed to open science, open society and open debate. Societies cannot flourish without the courage to speak out and challenge existing assumptions.

Thank you for playing your part. We will continue to play ours. We owe it to our fellow citizens.

Kind regards,
Abir Ballan (permanently suspended on Twitter TWICE)
Member of the Executive Committee ~ Pandemics Data & Analytics
Twitter: @abirballan, @Pandata19
Facebook: @Pandata19

Via https://off-guardian.org/2022/04/28/an-open-letter-to-elon-musk/

Mesopotamia and the Rise of the Assyrian Empire

Episode 19: Assyria Ascending

Ancient Mesopotamia: Life in the Cradle of Civilization

Dr Amanda H Podany

Film Review

Prior to the 14th century BC (when it achieved independence from from Hatti – see How Civilization Collapsed in the Late Bronze Age), Assyria was merely one kingdom among many in Mesopotamia. Centered along the Tigris River, it produced one of the most stable dynasties in human history, persisting over 700 years. Favored by sufficient rainfall to farm without irrigation, it also intersected several international trade routes. We know more about it than other Mesopotamian civilizations because it was immortalized in the Bible and by ancient Greek and Roman authors.

Podany divides Assyrian history into three distinct periods:

The Early Assyrian Period (1974-1807 BC) – when Assyrian merchants set up trading colonies in Anatolia.The Middle Assyrian Period (1807-971 BC) – when the kingdom expanded its boundaries to the Euphrates RiverThe Neo-Assyrian Period (971-610 BC)

Unlike other Mesopotamian kings, the king of Assyria was also high priest of the (Babylonian) god Assur.*

In 1200-1100 BC, Assyria collapsed along with other Near East kingdoms. However in the ninth century BC, Adadd Narari II set up recapturing Assyria’s former territories. In no way the “kind shepherd” like earlier Mesopotamian kings. He deliberately employed violence and terror to subdue captive territories and discourage rebellion.

Under Adadd Narari II and successive kings, the farmer-based army serving three months a year gradually transitions into a professional standing army. In addition to introducing mounted cavalry and battering rams, it refined the use of sieges to starve targeted cities into submission, as well as forcibly relocating captured prisoners away from their home territory.

The Israelites engaged in numerous rebellions in their efforts to break free of the Assyrian empire. The rebellions ended when the Assyrian king forced mass relocation of their population to scattered regions around the empire.

Film can be viewed free with a library card on Kanopy.

*After conquering Babylonia, Assyria adopted the Babylonian gods.

 

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/video/5754238/5754278

Myanmar Violence: a Slow Burn US Proxy War

Brian Berletic

The ongoing violence in Myanmar may have faded into the background of global media coverage as much more intense conflict shapes up within and along Ukraine’s borders in Eastern Europe and as Washington raises the prospect of direct conflict with China in Asia. However, Myanmar’s conflict serves as a point of destabilization which may impact the wider stability of Southeast Asia and thus undermine China in a more indirect but still significant manner.

Myanmar’s Fight Against Foreign Interference

The conflict began when Myanmar’s military took power from the government of Aung San Suu Kyi and her National League for Democracy (NLD) party in February 2021. While the Western media portrays this as an undemocratic military dictatorship deposing an elected government – Aung San Suu Kyi and the NLD through their collective US backing – had hijacked the nation’s electoral system.

The US National Endowment for Democracy’s (NED) webpage for Myanmar (still called by its British colonial nomenclature “Burma” by the NED) has at least 57 programs and organizations listed involving every aspect of Myanmar’s society from education and the judicial system, to media, ethnic relations, political campaigning, and supposed “human rights” advocacy groups.

With millions of dollars a year pouring in from the US government through NED, a powerful political machine was created capable of effortlessly installing into power pro-Western candidates through elections tainted by this blatant and extensive foreign interference.

Compounding this foreign interference was the fact that Aung San Suu Kyi’s administration included as key high-level advisors two British citizens (Robert San Pe and Joseph Fisher) and an Australian citizen (Sean Turnell). They crafted policy for everything from overhauling Myanmar’s judicial system, to its economic policy, to rewriting Myanmar’s constitution.

The military’s seizure of power was meant to uproot this foreign interference and restore sovereignty throughout Myanmar’s institutions.

Violent protests against the ousting of Aung San Suu Kyi quickly escalated into armed conflict with the backing of the United States, its allies, and a vast network across Southeast Asia of so-called “nongovernmental organizations” (NGOs) funded by Western governments. The remnants of Aung San Suu Kyi’s government formed the “National Unity Government” (NUG) which in turn created an armed “People’s Defense Force” (PDF).

Hundreds have died in the violence. While the Western media claimed Myanmar was heading into “civil war,” in reality the prospect of war has mostly subsided and has been replaced instead by the persistent threat of a high-intensity terrorist campaign carried out by the NUG’s PDFs as well as opportunistic armed ethnic groups that have on-and-off fought Myanmar’s central government since the nation gained independence from Britain in 1948.

Slow Burn Terrorism Sold by the West as “Fighting for Freedom”

Just as the Western media attempted to pass off Al Qaeda and the so-called “Islamic State” in Syria as “freedom fighters,” or paper over Nazi military formations operating within the Ukrainian military, the fact that Myanmar’s opposition is waging a nationwide terrorist campaign has been continsously spun by the likes of the BBC.

A recent BBC video report titled, “Inside the people’s resistance in Myanmar” follows armed fanatics as they destroy civilian infrastructure, raid guard shacks, and at one point in the video – plan and then supposedly storm and destroy the private home of an individual accused of being an “informant” – an accusation that when directed at members of opposition as grounds for arrest by Myanmar’s government is dismissed by Western “rights” groups and governments as “politically motivated.”

The BBC never produces any evidence that the targeted home belonged to an actual informant nor explains how extrajudicial violence against “informants” is justified. The BBC filmed the “raid” which appears entirely staged, complete with BBC cameras set up inside the home to film the militants arriving and entering the house.

While the BBC’s footage was obvious propaganda, the targeting of innocent civilians by deadly vigilantism in support of the ousted US-sponsored client regime is all too real.

The US government through the NED funds virtually every English-language media platform operating in or around Myanmar including Myanmar Now, , Democratic Voice of Burma (DVB), and Mizzima. And it is in the pages of these media platforms that admissions are piecemeal made to the level of terrorism and mass murder the “people’s resistance” actually consists of.

[…]

Via https://thealtworld.com/anthony_cartalucci/myanmar-violence-a-slow-burn-us-proxy-war

New Zealand Health Minister Introducing Bill Controlling Availability of Natural Products.

The shopping list of those planning to cut off our access to traditional remedies is very long and largely incomprehensible until you realise that there are commercial companies seeking to control their supply and secure the profits that can be made via monopoly control based on over regulation.

Rangitikei Environmental Health Watch

The ‘new world order’ aka globalists, (despite claims of equality for all) cannot abide you acquiring free and natural, health giving remedies … remember this from 2015? Time to save your heirloom seeds. EWR

Given the plethora of wannabe world rulers among the mega corporations, industrial and military powers, political ideologies, media and social media giants, big pharma, intergovernmental and judicial organisations currently competing for global influence, it is worth asking who actually rules the world? Who has the most power?

Undoubtedly the plant kingdom excels. Every individual in the world, in every nation, eats to live each day. Plants have enjoyed a coevolutionary symbiotic relationship with multicellular animal species for at least 500 million years. We have land and aquatic plants to thank for the oxygen we breathe.

Plants derive their timeless world sovereignty directly and continuously from the sun, the earth, and water. Ancient cultures have always…

View original post 1,551 more words

Has Globalisation Ended?

The Next Recession

Apart from inflation and war, what grips current economic thought is the apparent failure of what mainstream economics likes to call ‘globalisation’.  What mainstream economics means by globalisation is the expansion of trade and capital flows freely across borders.  In 2000, the IMF identified four basic aspects of globalisation: trade and transactions, capital and investment movements, migration and movement of people, and the dissemination of knowledge.  All these components apparently took off from the early 1980s as part of the ‘neoliberal’ reversal of previous national macro-management policies adopted by governments in the environment of the Bretton Woods world economic order (ie US hegemony).  Then the call was to break down tariff barriers, quotas and other trade restrictions and allow the multi-nationals to trade ‘freely’ and to switch their investments abroad to cheap labour areas to boost profitability.  This would lead to global expansion and harmonious development of the productive forces and resources of the world, it was claimed.

There was nothing new in this phenomenon.  There have been periods of increased trade and capital export before since capitalism became the dominant mode of production in the major economies by the mid-19th century.  In 1848, the authors of the Communist Manifesto noted the increasing level of national inter-dependence brought on by capitalism and predicted the universal character of the modern world society: “The bourgeoisie has through its exploitation of the world market given a cosmopolitan character to production and consumption in every country. To the great chagrin of Reactionists, it has drawn from under the feet of industry the national ground on which it stood. All old-established national industries have been destroyed or are daily being destroyed…. In place of the old local and national seclusion and self-sufficiency, we have intercourse in every direction, universal inter-dependence of nations.”

Indeed, we can distinguish previous periods of ‘globalisation’.  There was the period of 1850-70 which saw trade and investment expand sharply in Europe and the US (after the civil war), under the auspices of the British hegemony.  The depression of the 1870s to 1890s saw the end of that wave.  But another wave of global expansion took place in 1890s through to WW1, as new capitalist powers usurped British hegemony.  No one power established hegemony and that globalisation wave was stopped in its tracks by world war and continued to reverse through the Great Depression of the 1930s and up to WW2.  Then there was a new wave of global expansion under Bretton Woods and US hegemony, before the profitability crisis of the 1970s led to slumps and retraction.  From the mid-1980s and through 1990s, there was the largest expansion of trade and cross-border investment in the history of capitalism, with the US and European capitalism spreading its wings further and China entering global manufacturing and trading markets.

Indeed, according to the World Trade Organisation, a key indicator of ‘globalisation’, the ratio of world exports to world GDP, was broadly flat between 1870 and WW1, fell by nearly 40% in the interwar period; rose 50% from 1950-70; then stagnated until the 1990s, taking off until the Great Recession of 2009; after which, in the Long Depression of the 2010s, the ratio fell by about 12%, a decline not seen since the 1970s.

The latest globalisation wave started to wane as early as the beginning of the 2000s when global profitability slipped back.

[…]

Via https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2022/04/27/has-globalisation-ended/

Ivermectin Thrust Back Into Spotlight on Twitter After Elon Musk Takeover

 

Newsweek reported:

Just hours after the news broke of billionaire Elon Musk‘s $44 billion purchase of Twitter, ivermectin, the anti-parasitic drug touted as a possible treatment for COVID-19, is once again trending on the social media platform.

Ivermectin was the sixth most popular topic on Twitter in the U.S. on Tuesday afternoon, with more than 46,000 tweets, suggesting that many users were under the impression that the term had been previously censored on the platform.

In fact, the name of the treatment has never been banned, although it has been just one of a number of popularly cited treatments for COVID-19 that has remained controversial throughout the global pandemic.

[…]

Via https://www.newsweek.com/ivermectin-trends-again-elon-musk-covid-1701115

How to Reclaim Our Power From Corrupt Global Corporatists

By Dr Robert W. Malone M.D., M.S.

The corruption of political systems by global corporatists has filtered down to our science, medicine and healthcare systems.

Because science, medicine and politics are three threads woven into the same cloth of public policy, we have to work to fix all three simultaneously.

The corruption of political systems by global corporatists has filtered down to our science, medicine and healthcare systems and must be exposed.

Furthermore, the perversion of science and medicine by corporate interests is expanding its reach; it is pernicious and intractable. Regulatory capture by corporate interests runs rampant throughout our politics, governmental agencies and institutes.

The corporatists have infiltrated all three branches of government, and it is up to us, the people, to take control back. Corporate-public partnerships that have become so trendy have another name, that name is fascism — the political science term for the fusion of the interests of corporations and the state.

Basically, the tension between the interest of the republic and its citizens (which Jefferson felt should be primary), and the financial interests of business and corporations (Hamilton’s ideal) has swung far too far to the interests of corporations and their billionaire owners at the expense of the general population.

The nation and its governing arms (including the entrenched bureaucracy often referred to as the “deep state”) now primarily serve the interests of multinational corporations, their managers and owners, instead of the other way around — serving the people.

The term that best describes this system of government is called inverted totalitarianism. This term was first coined in 2003 by Dr. Sheldon Wolin, a political theorist and writer. Inverted totalitarianism is what the government of the United States has devolved into, as he had warned might happen many years ago in the book “Democracy Incorporated.”

The United States has been co-opted into a managed democracy. This democracy was placed into the hands of oligarchs by bureaucratic imperatives and managerial principles and practices, which have created a creeping form of totalitarianism.

Now we can clearly see the liberties and freedom of this democracy being eroded rapidly just as Wolin predicted.

The ending result is this new form of totalitarianism, that (unlike classical totalitarianism) does not have an authoritarian leader, but instead is run by a non-transparent group of managers and elites who run the country from within. What President Trump might call the “deep state.” Or what Steve Bannon originally called the “Uniparty.”

In effect, our democracy has been turned upside down while being captured by corporate interests that endorse authoritarian policies — hence “inverted totalitarianism.”

The infiltration of this version of fascism has gone so far that even routine aspects of the political sphere are determined by corporate interests.

This was cemented in the Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. the Federal Elec­tion Commis­sion, a decision that reversed century-old campaign finance restric­tion laws.

This ruling has enabled corpor­a­tions and other outside groups to spend unlim­ited funds on elec­tions.

As a nation, we are once again confronted by a historic conflict that goes back to Jefferson and Hamilton and the founding of this country. Simply stated this is the old issue of whether capitalism is a tool of (representative constitutional) democracy or is democracy a tool of capitalism.

Will democracy control capitalism or will capitalism control democracy? Two of our founding fathers, Jefferson and Hamilton, represent the two sides of the coin in this tension, and awareness of this dynamic conflict was built into our constitution.

In theory, the people, through democratic representation, are empowered to elect leaders and pass laws, but when corporate financial interests become too powerful they are able to overthrow this relationship and capture political control by exerting financial power and influence over the political process.

In the 21st Century, a new threat to democracy and the people’s rule has emerged.  That is the party of Davos, the alliance of transnational corporations, and their representatives as the leaders and managers of global governance.

This has yielded an emerging system of inverted totalitarianism on a global scale.

Transnational corporate rule is not limited by national rules and regulations, and its tentacles are everywhere.

At the national level, we see its effects on the judicial, legislative and executive branches.

On the international level, the money and power from the transnational organizations have bought off entities like the World Health Organization.

The nominal head and coordinating body of this globalized effort to control the world through capitalism has become the World Economic Forum, whose primary belief is that national boundaries are less important than global connectivity and management through corporatism.

Here we are today. In many ways, the hidden head of this unelected corporatist government structure is now the leadership of the World Economic Forum which meets annually in Davos Switzerland, where the heads of corporations and the apex predator financial firms come together to decide the governing decisions of the world (including the practice of medicine), and politicians and other influencers travel as supplicants akin to courtiers approaching an emperor or a pope.

So, if inverted totalitarianism is smashed together with the development of such a global corporatist ruling elite, the question becomes who is running the United States?

With the largest brush strokes possible, it comes down to the World Economic Forum and the party of Davos.

And what we have seen develop, worldwide, during the time of COVID is gross overreach, managerial incompetence and a reflexive tendency toward authoritarianism that has resulted in an appalling loss of life, liberty and ability to pursue happiness here in America.

What somehow must be accomplished, if we wish to retain the U.S. Constitutional form of government and the freedoms guaranteed by the founding documents, is to return to the primacy of the individual, “that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

It is people that should control the levers of government — we must return the balance between the Jeffersonian and Hamiltonian ideals.

Capitalism is in the service of representative democracy, not the other way around. That is what this great nation was founded on.

Resistance is almost the only way that this can be fought. It has to be organized — funding and the effort must have professional organizers.

Resistance has begun, largely in church communities and self-assembling social media aggregates, with people organizing to form autonomous groups outside of the formal power structures which include the two main political parties — both of whom have been significantly captured by corporate interests (the Uniparty).

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/reclaim-power-corrupt-global-corporatists/

All risk, no benefit? COVID jabs do not prevent severe illness, transmission or deaths

by: Sara Middleton, staff writer

(NaturalHealth365)  My, how the “science” (narrative?) has changed.  First, we were told that the novel gene-based tech called mRNA COVID-19 shots – produced at an unprecedented lightning speed, bereft of the bureaucratic red tape that virtually all other drugs navigate to make it to the market – were the only way to end the pandemic.  We were also told the injections were “highly effective” at preventing COVID-19.  Getting vaxxed, we were told, would prevent infection, transmission, and the death of everyone’s grandmas.

Then, as real-world evidence revealed itself, we were told that these shots were actually never intended to prevent transmission – but only meant to reduce the likelihood that someone infected with SARS-CoV-2 would become severely sick and end up in the hospital.  It was all about reducing pressure on the “overwhelmed” U.S. healthcare system (as if hospitals around the country haven’t already experienced “overwhelming” pressure in past flu seasons).

But a look at recent data now shows that even the claim that the shots prevent severe illness, hospitalization, and death isn’t based on fact.

A COVID shot castle built on sand?  Big picture view of recent data reveals that mRNA jabs aren’t doing what officials claim they do

In a recent article, Children’s Health Defense pulled together COVID shot data from sources including the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the United Kingdom’s Office of National Statistics.  The article nicely summarizes some important trends that seem to suggest COVID shots are NOT preventing hospitalizations and deaths as well as CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky claimed they did back in August 2021 (when she admitted that the shots “can’t” prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission).

Here are a few of the findings summarized in the article:

Natural immunity surpasses vaxxes alone in terms of preventing infection (even before the more infectious variant Omicron allegedly came around) and even appears at least somewhat better at preventing severe illness and hospitalizationIn England, unvaxxed individuals appeared less likely to die with a COVID diagnosis than double vaxxed individuals during the Omicron waveAny potential benefit of prevention of severe illness and death from the jab seems to precipitously decline within a matter of months following a third dose (and yet somehow, officials have used this as justification for encouraging people to roll up their sleeves for yet another dose of the same drug)Are COVID shots worth the risk?

Here’s the bottom line (again):

Only individuals should be able to decide whether the potential benefits of medical treatment or intervention are worth the potential risks for themselves and their children – not governments, not employers, and not public opinion.

Individuals should be fully informed of all the possible risks of said treatment or intervention before consenting to or declining it.

And if it were to turn out that the potential risks of treatment were likely to outweigh the potential benefits for a given individual – based in large part on their age, overall health, and lifestyle – then one would be hard-pressed not to see how a coercive, propagandized push to take the drug would create even more distrust in the pharmaceutical and political industries.

[…]

Via https://www.naturalhealth365.com/all-risk-no-benefit-covid-jabs-do-not-prevent-severe-illness-transmission-or-deaths.html

Cardiologist says 30 percent of vaccinated pilots would fail health screenings due to vaccine injuries

Dr Eddy Betterman

(Article by Debra Heine republished from AMGreatness.com)

Joshua Yoder, an airline pilot and co-founder of the U.S. Freedom Flyers said during an interview Wednesday that a cardiologist told him that if the airlines were conducting certain health screenings, 30 percent of the pilots currently flying would probably be disqualified due to vaccine-induced heart conditions.

Yoder told tech millionaire and Vaccine Safety Research Foundation founder Steve Kirsch that his group has received hundreds of reports about pilots flying planes while suffering from adverse side effects from the COVID vaccines.

The most prominent health issues being reported, the pilot noted, include chest pains, myocarditis, and pericarditis. Yoder said that three vaccinated pilot called him yesterday and said that they’re “currently flying with chest pains,” and another one said he is being treated by a cardiologist. He noted that the pilots want to remain anonymous because they don’t want to lose their jobs.

Yoder said the U.S. Freedom Flyers would like to find a solution for these pilots, and work with doctors, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), airlines, and unions to come up with a protocol so they have “some kind of immunity” that would allow the pilots to talk openly about what is happening to them.

The USFF formed last fall to help employees in the transportation industry oppose the federal laws surrounding vaccinations.

“I’m afraid if we keep going down this path, at some point it’s going to end in catastrophe,” he said.

“If passengers actually knew what was going on at the airlines and the FAA, they would be livid, and everyone would be jumping on a class action suit against all of them,” he said.

Yoder said that world renowned cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough told him that if the pilots were regularly tested, a significant number of them would probably have to be grounded.

“He [McCullough] said that if every vaccinated pilot were to be screened, there would be somewhere around a 30 percent loss in manpower,” Yoder told Kirsch.

McCullough, along with Idaho pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole, Robert Kennedy Jr, Lt. Col Teresa Long M.D., Lt. Col. Peter Chambers D.O. and other experts signed letter to the Federal Aviation Administration and the major airlines on Dec. 15, 2021, urging them to flag all vaccinated pilots, and administer EKGs, D-dimer tests, troponin tests, and cardiac MRIs to assess their health.

The doctors warned that adverse events from vaccination could cause “a pilot (to lose) control of his aircraft” and lead to “untold devastation.”

As American Greatness reported on Wednesday, an American Airlines pilot recently suffered a cardiac arrest six minutes after landing his airbus at the Dallas-Fort Worth airport.

Captain Robert Snow nearly died when his heart stopped on April 9, according to Yoder. “They had to shock him three times with the AED [automated external defibrillator] to bring him back,” he said.

Yoder noted that Snow was taken to Baylor, Scott and White Health Center, which is only ten minutes from both American Airlines, and the union (the Allied Pilots Association), yet no one from the airline or union called Snow while he was in the hospital, or stopped by to visit him. The only thing the airline did was fly his family to the hospital to meet with him.

Snow called the U.S. Freedom Fliers for help, and the group assembled a “world-class” team of doctors and lawyers to assist him. Snow is now recuperating at home, Yoder said.

Yoder acknowledged that it is pretty clear that Snow’s cardiac arrest was caused by the Johnson and Johnson vaccine, but the pilot has been undergoing a series of tests to confirm it.

Yoder told Kirsch that the airline industry does not seem to want to deal with the potentially dangerous incident.

“American Airlines is trying to create as much distance between themselves and this incident as humanely possible,” he said. “So is the FAA, and so are the unions. We can’t even get a response.”

Yoder said that Snow would be speaking out soon, and when he does “you’re going to hear some very interesting details that are going to be very damning for American Airlines, the Allied Pilots Association, the FAA, and everyone else involved.”

Yoder also mentioned two other pilots who have bravely come forward to talk about their vaccine injuries.

Pilot Greg Pierson has spoken out against the COVID vaccines ever since he suffered a stroke after getting the jab under duress, last year. Pierson said during an interview last December that if he had had his stroke while piloting a plane, he could have caused a crash.

WATCH AND SHARE Brave Pilot Greg Pearson Speaks Out About The Dangers Of The #Vaccine #ClotShot #Booster #vaccineinjury #VaccineSideEffects #VaccineAdverseEffects #VaccineAdverseReaction pic.twitter.com/MficeyMOu0

— information Chaser (@tsubject) December 31, 2021

[…]

Via https://dreddymd.com/2022/04/26/vaccinated-pilots-fail-health-screenings-vaccine-injuries/