Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 490

How the Covid Shots Cripple Immune Function

By Dr Joseph Mercola

In “Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The Role of G-quadruplexes, Exosomes and MicroRNAs,” Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., and Drs. Peter McCullough, Greg Nigh and Anthony Kyriakopoulos explain how the COVID shots suppress your innate immune function, and how they may cause neurological diseasesTheir landmark paper was the source of major controversy in that the prominent journal in which it was published receive much negative feedback and the editor of the journal was forced to resign although the paper has not been retracted at this timeG4s are genome-wide targets of transcriptional regulation. The “G” stands for guanine. G4 is DNA sequence of four guanines, which plays an important role in diseases such as cancers and neurological disorders. The COVID jab spike protein produces far more G-quadruplexes (G4) than the virus. The G4 causes prion protein to misfold, which can result in prion diseases such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and Alzheimer’sTwo specific microRNA have been found in people who got the jab, and these microRNA’s interfere with Type 1 interferon response, which is a key part of your immune system. When Type 1 interferon is suppressed, you become more prone to infection and chronic diseaseThe COVID jab produces high levels of immunoglobulin (IgG) antibodies, which are associated with autoimmune disease. It does not produce mucosal antibodiesAntibodies against the spike protein may be responsible for cases in which patients developed highly aggressive prion disease after their second jab.

In this interview, return guest Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a senior research scientist at MIT for over five decades,1 discusses her paper,2 “Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The Role of G-quadruplexes, Exosomes and MicroRNAs,” published in the June 2022 issue of Food and Chemical Toxicology.

The paper was co-written with Drs. Peter McCullough, Greg Nigh and Anthony Kyriakopoulos. In May 2021, Nigh and Seneff published a paper3 detailing the differences between the spike protein and the COVID jab spike protein.

In the “Innate Immune Suppression” paper, they and their other co-authors delve deep into the mechanisms of the COVID shots, showing how they suppress your innate immune system.

The paper caused quite a stir when it was first posted, prior to publication. A campaign was launched to have it retracted on the premise that it would discourage people from getting these life-saving shots — regardless of whether the mechanisms described were true or not.

Ultimately, the controversy led to the resignation of the editor of the journal. Many have also tried to discredit Seneff, and McCullough has since been stripped of his medical credentials.4

Understanding G-Quadruplexes

G-quadruplexes (G4) are genomewide targets of transcriptional regulation, and as such as a novel target for drug design. The “G” in G4 stands for guanine, so G4 is DNA sequence of four guanines. It’s one of the four nucleotides — the basic code — in DNA, and it’s known to play an important role in diseases such as cancers and neurological disorders.5

As explained by Seneff, prions, when misfolded, build beta sheets and precipitate out of the cytoplasm, causing plaque to form. This plaque is a hallmark of several neurodegenerative diseases in animals and humans, such as Mad Cow disease, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, scrapie (which affects sheep) and chronic wasting disease in deer.

[…]

How the COVID Jab Can Induce Autoimmune Disease

As explained by Seneff, the mRNA in the jab is taken into your lymph system and spleen, germinal centers where antibodies are produced, and in order to produce the antibodies, these germinal centers release exosomes. This can help explain the phenomenon of “shedding,” but it also helps explain the immune destruction we see occurring.

[…]

Mechanism of Action

Swiss researchers recently reported finding elevated troponin levels in 100% of COVID jabbed individuals, indicating everyone is suffering some degree of heart damage, even if they’re asymptomatic.6,7

[…]

The Role of MicroRNAs

Another piece of the puzzle is related to the role of microRNAs, which are embedded in the exosomes that travel to the tissues. MicroRNAs should not be confused with mRNA. They’re two different things. The microRNAs are short pieces of RNA, about 22 nucleotides long. Unlike mRNA, microRNA do not code for protein.

The mRNA in the jabs are designed to be extremely resilient. Normally, mRNA lasts a few hours, but the mRNA in the jabs stick around producing protein in cells for several months, at minimum primarily because of the substitution of the nucleotide uridine with pseudouridine.

Because the mRNA is so resilient, spleen cells have to try to cope with all the spike protein that they cannot stop making, and one way they do that is by pushing the spike protein out in the form of exosomes. Those exosomes also contain microRNAs. Indian researchers found two specific microRNAs in people who got the jab, and these microRNAs interfere with Type 1 interferon response.

[…]

Hypothesis to Explain Post-Jab Sudden Death

Seneff goes on to cite animal research from 2005, in which mice were exposed to a virus that causes myocarditis. They wanted to see what would happen if the mice were suffering from myocarditis and then got a shot of adrenaline. So, the mice were infected with the myocarditis-inducing virus, and then, 120 days later, they injected them with adrenaline.

The dose given killed 70% of them. Meanwhile, control mice that did not have myocarditis suffered no ill effect when injected with the same dose of adrenaline. The mice that died, died of heart failure. Basically, their hearts were too damaged to withstand the adrenaline rush. Today, we’re seeing a similar effect in athletes, who are dropping dead while exerting themselves.

Digging for other papers, Seneff found one that detailed the Type 1 interferon response in chromaffin cells, the cells that make adrenaline. Type 1 interferon inhibits and reduces their production of adrenaline.

Seneff’s theory is that the COVID jabs interferes with your body’s ability to respond to Type 1 interferon, thereby allowing too much adrenaline to be released. If your heart has been damaged by the spike protein, the outcome could be lethal, as we’ve seen.

[…]

At the same time, microthrombi (micro blood clots) are activated by the spike protein, which could have lethal effects, and endothelial cells (the cells lining your blood vessels) are also inflamed. So, there’s not just one mechanism by which the jabs could kill you.

Spike Protein Creates Incredibly Tough Blood Clots

According to Seneff, blood clots are also connected to the prion aspect. Many different proteins are amyloidogenic and can misfold, causing them to precipitate out, including proteins in your blood. Blood clots are tough to break down, and when you add spike protein into them, they become even tougher.

Seneff suspects the spike protein binds to fibrin, causing it then to misfold in a way that makes it very resistant to breaking down. The same thing happens with prion proteins. When they misfold, they create a gel that becomes denser over time, eventually becoming completely inaccessible to the water base.

Link to video

Link to paper

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9012513/

[…]

Twitter lives as Musk pulls all-nighter… Banned accounts reappearing…

Posted BY: Bill | NwoReport

The naysayers said Twitter would go dark, but Musk has put himself in tight spots before and knows how to manage a crack team.

Twitter is alive

More alive at 1 am than it used to be during the daytime pic.twitter.com/kXAsOConnI

— Whole Mars Catalog (@WholeMarsBlog) November 19, 2022

Just leaving Twitter HQ code review pic.twitter.com/pYcXRTJm14

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 19, 2022

Musk offers some more clarity on censorship policy. Question is, how do you define negative/hate tweets? This policy is not exactly in line with the 1st Amendment, as we were promised.

We also see those Orwellian fact-checks are still there promoting official truths:

.@ElonMusk, @Twitter is vandalizing (using hotly disputed language that election technology is "safe and secure") and suppressing this educational tweet on the debate on voting machines. https://t.co/uiorbrjyGg

— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) November 19, 2022

[…]

Via https://nworeport.me/2022/11/19/twitter-lives-as-musk-pulls-all-nighter-banned-accounts-reappearing/

Roundup Linked to Antibiotic Resistance in Deadly Infections Commonly Acquired in Hospitals

By  Beyond Pesticides

A study published late last month in the journal Scientific Reports is the latest to link commonly used herbicides to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Roundup and other glyphosate weedkillers induce antibiotic resistance in deadly hospital-acquired bacteria, according to a study published late last month in the journal Scientific Reports.

This is the latest finding connecting commonly used herbicides to the rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, with prior research showing glyphosate, 2,4-D and dicamba are able to create resistance in Salmonella and E. coli.

While federal regulatory agencies continue to ignore the role of pesticides in the development of antibiotic resistance, it is critical for states and localities to take action to protect their most vulnerable both from toxic exposure to these herbicides and the multitude of indirect effects caused by their use.

This is all happening as antibiotic resistance is rising to dangerously high levels in all parts of the world, according to the World Health Organization.

In the May 1 issue of the Bulletin of the World Health Organization, Samira Choudhury, Ph.D., et al. write, “Often referred to as the silent pandemic, antimicrobial resistance claims the lives of over 700,000 people annually.”

The authors continue, “A study suggests that if no actions are taken, antimicrobial resistance will cause 10 million deaths per year by 2050 and an economic impact of over 100 trillion United States dollars.”

Scientists focus their research on Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a bacteria commonly found in the environment, but able to cause serious disease in humans. Healthy people can be infected from improperly cleaned hot tubs or swimming pools, resulting in skin rashes and eye and ear infections.

However, the greatest risk of P. aeruginosa is in the hospital setting. The bacteria is well known to infect those suffering from burn wounds, on a ventilator or other invasive medical device and/or with a catheter. Hospital-acquired P. aeruginosa is deadly in large part due to the wide spectrum of multi-drug antibiotic resistance the bacteria possess.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicates that in 2017 32,600 Americans hospitalized came down with a P. aeruginosa infection, with 2,700 passing away as a result.

To better understand the role pesticides like glyphosate are playing in these deadly infections, scientists examined five different strains of P. aeruginosa, four retrieved from the environment and one from a clinical setting. All represented strains that were initially sensitive to antibiotics.

These strains were exposed to both technical grade glyphosate and a range of glyphosate-based herbicide (GBH) formulations, including the products Roundup Mega, Dominator Extra 608 SL and Gladiator 480 SL (which are sold only in Europe).

P. aeruginosa was exposed to 0.5% of glyphosate and GBH products per the volume of the medium (equivalent to 1.8-2.8 g/L [glyphosate] acid depending on the type of formulation).

“This concentration falls within the recommended dilution range of GBHs [0.2-3.5% (v/v)] for agricultural and household use and similar to those found in water after agricultural practices,” the study notes.

At this level, glyphosate and its formulated products significantly increase the minimum inhibitory concentration (the lowest concentration of an antibiotic that would inhibit the growth of a given bacteria) of P. aeruginosa to the carbapenem-type antibiotic imipenem by between 2-32 fold. This occurred in all strains and under different exposure scenarios.

“Considering the worldwide use of [glyphosate] and GBHs, and the simultaneous emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in environmental matrices, the detected interactions between these chemicals may affect microbial communities and possess a potential environmental and human health risk,” the authors explain.

Future studies will likely determine the mechanism through which this problem is occurring.

It is becoming increasingly evident that glyphosate is creating resistance problems in more than merely the weeds on which the chemical is being applied to control. Initial reports on glyphosate’s antibiotic resistance properties came in 2015, a week after the chemical was deemed a possible carcinogen by the World Health Organization.

Two years later these reports were confirmed in greater detail by the same team of scientists. In 2018, researchers found that bacteria exposed to glyphosate-based Roundup can develop antibiotic resistance 100,000 times faster than average.

The most recent findings indicate that this resistance is developing directly in the field, with soils sprayed with weedkillers likely to contain higher amounts of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

The regulatory response to this near decade of research on the antibiotic resistance properties of commonly used herbicides has been nil. While the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires herbicide product labels to include information on abating weed resistance, antibiotic resistance is not mentioned.

If anything, the EPA uses the phenomenon of antibiotic resistance as a comparison point to weed resistance, without any mention of the role glyphosate and other herbicides could be playing in both phenomena.

With inaction from federal regulators, it is up to states and localities to protect their residents from the rise of pesticide-induced antibiotic-resistant bacteria. P. aeruginosa is known to attack the most vulnerable at its weakest stage.

Yet, it is perfectly possible for a landscaper to be spraying glyphosate outside of the room of a patient suffering from a P. aeruginosa infection.

Despite the high level of care that doctors, nurses and custodial staff may put into deterring the spread of P. aeruginosa infections within a hospital, pesticide use outside may be resulting in patients and staff tracking in resistant bacteria, acting as a steady source of environmental exposures.

Resistant bacteria travels throughout the environment through a process called horizontal gene transfer, causing widespread resistance even if the use site of the chemical does not come into direct contact with someone suffering from or vulnerable to an infectious disease.

The human pathogenic organisms themselves do not need to be directly sprayed by the antibiotic because the movement of genes in bacteria is not solely “vertical” — that is from parent to progeny — but can be “horizontal” — from one bacterial species to another.

Stopping the use of carcinogenic, antibiotic resistance forming pesticides outside hospitals where individuals are suffering from the diseases these chemicals can cause is common sense.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/glyphosate-weedkillers-antibiotic-resistance-deadly-infections-hospitals/

 

The Qing Dynasty: Nomads Return from the North

Episode 37: The Qing: Nomads Return from the North

Foundations of Eastern Civilization

Dr Craig Benjamin (2013)

Film Review

During the early 17th century, warring Manchu tribes [1] became unified into a single confederation under Nurhachi. After expelling the Ming from Manchuria, they proceeded to conquer parts of North Korea and eventually (in 1644) Beijing. Numerous Han generals, who detested the corrupt eunuchs running the country, defected and facilitated the Manchu conquest. Nurhachi’s son Dorgon declared himself the first Qing emperor, though it would be 40 years before southern China would be fully integrated.

Viewing their main duty as looking after their subjects, the Qing Dynasty ruled according to Confucian principles. Although they outlawed Han Chinese from intermarrying with Manchu or traveling to Manchuria, they used a well-organized central bureaucracy to ensure effective and peaceable management of a majority Han population.

Some Han loyalists fled or were exiled to Taiwan. Moreover there was active burning and suppression of books concerning frontier or defense problems or hostile to the notion of nomadic rulers.

China experienced its greatest military expansion under the Qing dynasty, with Tibet becoming a protectorate and Vietnam and Nepal becoming vassal states. The Qing stationed military garrisons as far west as Turkistan and encouraged merchants to settle there to help spread Chinese language and culture. Qing expansion into Central Asia brought Uighurs, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz and Mongols under Chinese control. It also led to border conflicts with Russia over the Amur River Valley.[2] Although the Qing failed in their attempt to conquer Burma, they eventually conquered Taiwan in 1683.

One major weakness of Qing rule was the relative absence of industrial expansion Europe was experiencing. Although only 11% of China’s terrain is suitable for farming, agriculture remained the primary base its economic wealth.

Even though Chinese agriculture (according to Benjamin) was the most successful preindustrial farming system,[3] poupation growh began to outstrip food production as 19th centry Qing emperors became more focused on their harems and hunting and began delegating their power to their eunuchs. Food shortages were aggravated by various Qing laws forbidding maritime activity and restricting international trade.

Qing rulers clearly favored stability over innovation, which they feared might lead to unsettling political change. Skyrocketing population growth made labor so cheap, they had no incentive to invent labor saving machines or even canon and firearms, which the Qing military could easily import them from Europe.

[1] Manchu were descended from Jurchen nomads who adopted sedentary lifestyles after migrating to modern day Mancuhria.

[2] A 1689 treaty assigned the Amur to China.

[3] Chinese population levels:

1500 – 100 million1600 – 160 million1650 – 140 million (population reduced due to war)1700 – 160 million1750 – 225 million1800 – 360 million

[4] Especially after introduction of New World maize, sweet potatoes and peanuts allowed farmers to produce food in previously unproductive areas.

Film can be viewed free with a library card on Kanopy.

https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/5808608/5808687

FDA Declares Lab-Grown Chicken ‘Safe to Eat’ — But Scientists, Food Safety Advocates Have Questions

Image credit: UPSIDE Foods

By  Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

Describing the development as “a food revolution,” the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on Wednesday said chicken produced using animal cell culture technology that takes living cells from chickens and grows the cells in a controlled environment is safe for human consumption.

Describing the development as “a food revolution,” the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Wednesday declared lab-grown chicken meat developed by Berkeley, California-based food-tech firm Upside Foods is safe for human consumption.

Upside Foods “will use animal cell culture technology to take living cells from chickens and grow the cells in a controlled environment to make the cultured animal cell food,” the FDA said.

The news — widely reported as an FDA “approval” of lab-grown meat — signifies the completion of the first, and biggest, of the three regulatory steps Upside Foods must complete before its “cultivated” chicken attains full approval and can be sold to the public, according to TIME.

Although two more steps must follow before the FDA can grant the product full approval, the agency’s language suggests the approval is a foregone conclusion.

[…]

The FDA and some media outlets cheered the news — but others, including scientists and food safety advocates, expressed concerns about the adequacy of the FDA’s preliminary review process.

Experts who spoke to The Defender also questioned the safety of lab-grown meat, which is produced with gene-edited cells, and some scientists argued that, despite claims to the contrary, the production process for lab-grown “meats” is energy-intensive and not, as advertised, beneficial to the environment.

Some also questioned Upside Foods’ connections to figures and entities such as Cargill, Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Richard Branson, Kimbal Musk, brother of Elon Musk and co-founder of The Kitchen, “a growing family of businesses that pursues an America where everyone has access to real food,” and the World Economic Forum (WEF).

[…]

In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Jaydee Hanson, policy director for the Center for Food Safety, questioned the FDA’s “pre-market consultation:”

“The FDA regulatory process in general relies on company testing of their products.

“The FDA, in this case, seemed to mostly review what the company sent them, but did not require additional tests and did not require the company to disclose its methods in a complete and transparent manner.”

The next steps in the regulatory process involve the U.S. Department of Agriculture and its Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) before full approval is granted.

[…]

“In short, the documents shared by the FDA and the Upside Foods Co. show us where more research and more transparent data are needed, but this is a woefully deficient review by the FDA.

[…]

“The FDA’s review of the first-ever cell-cultured food for U.S. approval is a start, but grossly inadequate. In this ‘pre-market consultation,’ neither the company nor the FDA presented the actual data from tests looking at the effects of raising these cells in fetal bovine serum and enzymes from the intestines and pancreas of animals.

“Likewise, while the company notes that it uses genetic engineering to keep the cells growing, it fails to share which genes are being used. This is vital information that consumers and policymakers need to know to make informed decisions in the best interests of public health. We should make certain that genes linked to cancer are not being used.”

Experts raise alarm about genetically engineered cells and risk of cancer

Hanson also questioned the use of genetically engineered cells as part of the production process: “The company also notes that it is using genetic engineering to promote continuous growth of the cells. This is disturbing, in that it is likely that the genes being manipulated can promote cancers.

“Medical cell cultures use cancer cells for testing of drugs, etc., but cancer-causing genes should not be used in food production. Food additives that cause cancer are illegal. Unfortunately, the company does not list exactly which genes it is using for genetically engineered cells.”

The genetic engineering process employed by Upside Foods appears to involve CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats), a gene-editing technology that acts as a “precise pair of molecular scissors that can cut a target DNA sequence, directed by a customizable guide.”

[…]

As recently reported by The Defender, while CRISPR has been touted as a potential solution to global hunger and food shortages, many scientists question this claim.

In an October 2022 interview with The Defender, Claire Robinson, M.Phil., managing editor of GMWatch, said the gene editing process may have unintended effects that can adversely impact human health:

“These were also risks with the old-style GMOs [genetically modified organisms], and they are still risks with these gene-edited GM plants with animals.

“The risks, if you’re gene editing them … are that there will be knock-on effects on the animals, welfare or health that we can’t anticipate, such as deformities or changes in the function of certain genes in the animal.”

Michael Antoniou, Ph.D., in an October 2022 interview with The Defender, agreed, stating that, “innately, gene editing also can bring about unintended DNA damage … even at the site of your intended edit or elsewhere in the DNA of your target cells, with unknown downstream consequences.”

A report published in the Journal of Genetics and Genomics in 2020 found CRISPR gene-editing in rice resulted in numerous unintended and undesirable on-target and off-target mutations.

[…]

“Scientists know that these things are not ready yet to go into clinical trials,” she added. “On the whole, they’re certainly not ready to be used on [the public].”

[…]

The company also claims that “at scale, we project cultivated meat will use 77% less water and 62% less land than conventional meat. And we expect these numbers to get better over time. We currently use 100% renewable energy at our production facility.”

[…]

Scientists and experts who spoke to The Defender argued, however, that the process of cultivating lab-grown meat is heavily energy-intensive. According to Hanson:

“Many proponents of cell-cultured meat and poultry argue that it is a way of avoiding climate change. However, this ignores that cell-cultured processes are incredibly energy-intensive.”

In her recent interview with The Defender, Robison expressed a similar perspective, describing such claims of environmental friendliness as:

“A pipe dream, because the energy costs and the resource costs of bioreactor technologies are actually huge, and it simply won’t be possible, especially in a climate of rising energy bills.

“It simply won’t be possible to feed thousands or millions of people on the products of these technologies.”

Aside from high energy consumption, Hanson raised other potential environmental concerns involved with the process of developing lab-grown meat.

Hanson told The Defender:

“Cell cultures require the use of antibiotics to assure that the culture is not overtaken by pathogens. It is difficult to be sure that the cells that the company would take from poultry or meat animals are not infected with prions, viruses or bacteria.

“Finally, the waste produced by the culturing process needs to be disposed of. The chemicals from the waste will likely be dumped into local sewer systems. Without more data on the chemicals being used and the amounts of electricity being used, it is difficult to know how much environmental impact this production system has.”

Indeed, the FDA’s scientific memo accompanying its recent announcement, contained a three-page list of “potential identity, quality, and safety issues” involved with Uphill Foods’ manufacturing process, including:

Cells from different line or species inadvertently used.Carryover of adventitious agents such as bacteria, fungi, viruses, parasites, and prions during isolation.Introduction of contaminants in laboratory reagents.Introduction of contaminants from animal-derived reagents (e.g. bovine serum, trypsin).Unintended effects of immortalization.Contamination, and facility environment contamination, with adventitious agents through inadequate sterilization of bioreactors.Presence of elemental contaminants (toxic heavy metals) after harvest.Presence of residual unintended material from genetic engineering.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/lab-grown-chicken-meat-fda-safety/

COP27 missses the boat on the real climate issue: EMFs that ultimately may destroy earth.

By S.A.F.E. Helps You

In order to navigate the Conference, reports Cellular Phone Task Force assistant Kathleen Burke from Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, one must have a cell phone out and on nearly at all times. For the United Nations’ 27th Conference of the Parties on Climate Change, held this year at this resort city on the Red Sea, four fake palm trees have been erected on the grounds of the COP in order for the 40,000 conference attendees to all be on their cell phones at the same time, all day long, every day for two weeks. Each “tree”, captured in the foreground in the photo above, is simply a metal scaffolding for antennas.

The Safe and Sound Pro II radio frequency meter, which Kathleen brought to the COP in order to measure radiation levels, reads “Extreme” at all times everywhere on the grounds of the COP, inside and out. She may be the only person at the conference who does not have a cell phone.

The purpose of Kathleen’s participation as an observer at the COP is to begin to build bridges to the people who care most about the future of our world, who are not even aware of an existential threat that is even more urgent than the one they came to Egypt to address, and yet is intimately related to it. She is distributing the following letter to the delegates — a letter that I wrote and officially submitted to the COP 27 before she arrived. Kathleen delivered the letter by hand today to all the offices of the parties (the countries represented at the Conference), as well as the Environmental Defense Fund and the World Health Organization.

‘A blind spot must be filled   Outside of an atomic nucleus, there are only two fundamental forces in nature: gravity and electricity.

The electromagnetic force is  1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times stronger than the gravitational force. Yet much of western science pretends that it does not exist. This is now having terminal consequences for life on Earth. The consequences for life are being blamed on microorganisms. The consequences for the environment are being blamed on climate change.

This Conference is rightly concerned with halting the burning of fossil fuels. Unless that is stopped, the Earth will become uninhabitable.

But even if it is stopped, the Earth will not survive unless global electrosmog is also stopped — electrosmog from the wireless cloud and from satellites. And electrosmog is even more of an emergency than climate change. We have only years to stop it, not decades. In addition, many of the strategies for reducing our dependence on fossil fuels — solar power, wind power, the smart grid, electric vehicles, smart highways, smart cities, and so forth — are only making matters much worse. The methods used to gather information about altered animal habitats — GPS, radio tracking devices, etc. — are killing wildlife instead of saving them.

The following are a few of the facts that the United Nations must immediately recognize and take control of in order for our children to live to grow up:   Electricity, and no other force, is responsible for life. The study of electricity must be restored to biology, chemistry, and medicine.

Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) interfere with the flow of electrons in our nerves,our brains, and our hearts’ pacemakers. This is responsible for the recent huge increases in the prevalence of neurological diseases such as ADHD, Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and autism, and the large increase in the incidence of heart attacks in young people.EMFs interfere with the flow of electrons from the food we eat to the oxygen we breathe, which occurs day and night in the mitochondria of every cell in order to make the energy necessary for life.This interference with metabolism — interference with the burning of sugars, fats and proteins for energy — has put all living things into a state of oxygen deprivation. This is occurring to every person, every animal, every insect, and every plant, without ceasing and without possibility of escape.The reduced ability of our cells to digest sugars is called diabetes.The reduced ability of our cells to digest fats causes them to be deposited in in our tissues, resulting in obesity. It causes them to be deposited in coronary arteries, resulting in heart disease.The reduced ability of our cells to utilize the oxygen we breathe causes them to revert to anaerobic (non-oxygen-using) metabolism, resulting in cancer.The extraordinary increases in these four pandemic diseases — obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancer — are predominantly caused by constant radiation from personal wireless devices and the global infrastructure that supports them.In bees, which have a very high metabolism, this interference is quickly lethal. Colony collapse disorder is caused almost entirely by electrosmog.The 75% decline in flying insects in nature reserves throughout Germany, and the 98% to 99% decline in the number of crawling insects in a Puerto Rican rainforest — decreases that reflect what is globally being called “insect apocalypse” — are predominantly caused by the enormous increase in the intensity of radiation from the global wireless infrastructure.The unprecedented mass deaths of nesting birds worldwide in the spring and summer of 2022 was due to the tremendous global intensification of wireless infrastructure now occurring on land, in space, and in the oceans.The emissions from wireless devices are called radio frequency (RF) radiation. In addition to the general interference with electron flow in our bodies that occurs from any source of EMFs, RF radiation carries complex information from one wireless device to another in the form of frequencies and pulsation patterns. It carries the same information to the cells of our bodies, interfering with and drowning out the communication between our cells, and between our bodies and the Earth.This interferes with reproduction, growth, differentiation, maturation, healing, and normal functioning, and is responsible for the dramatic degradation of human health in the past two and a half decades.This interference with internal communication does not depend on dose. Even at near-zero power levels, RF radiation has been shown to alter brain waves and change the structure of DNA.Every wireless device and every antenna is responsible for electrosmog. None can ever be used safely, not even theoretically. Not cell towers, not cell phones, not WiFi, not Bluetooth, and not any of the 25 different wireless devices owned by the average household today.

Communication satellites, now being launched almost every other day, up to 54 at a time, by governments and private corporations, are massively polluting and altering the electromagnetic environment of the Earth itself. This is further degrading all of life below, because every living thing is part of the global electric circuit which flows at all times between the sky and the Earth.

There are 15 billion cell phones on Earth today emitting RF radiation, along with more than 6 million cell towers. At least 5,000 satellites are emitting radiation globally from space, with at least 100,000 more being scheduled and planned.

On behalf of my organization, the millions of people who support my work, and on behalf of humanity, all of life, and the Earth, I ask the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change to recognize electrosmog as the emergency that it is, and a huge contributor to aspects of the degradation of life that have heretofore been blamed only on climate change. I further ask the United Nations to open an official discussion on this emergency threat to all nations and I propose the drawing up of a new treaty and the establishment of a Convention on Electrosmog. I, and the thousands of global experts with whom I communicate, are available to assist in this effort in any way that is required.”

[…]

Via https://safehelpsyou.org/2022/11/18/cop-27-missses-the-boat-on-the-real-climate-issue-emfs-that-ultimately-may-destroy-earth/

Euthanasia Used in Canada to Get Rid of Poorest People

Orinoco Tribune

Euthanasia, also called “assisted death,” is a measure available in some countries that allows people suffering from incurable illnesses to request medical assistance for a painless death. However, in Canada, it is increasingly used by people living alone and in poverty, yet it is not an issue of concern for the Canadian government.

The Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) Act is Canada’s legal basis for assisted death. It is currently in the eye of the storm because everything seems to indicate that it is being used to eliminate the poorest and most systemically marginalized people.

Alarm bells went off in May when two homeless women applied for assisted death and had their requests approved. While they had underlying illnesses, what pushed the women to choose death was that they no longer had the resources to afford to live.

“The government sees me as expendable trash, a complainer, useless and a pain in the ass,” one of the women said at the time. After spending two years unsuccessfully pleading for better living conditions, she applied for euthanasia.

Recent cases of poor Canadians choosing assisted death due to their inability to live with dignity have provoked disbelief and outrage. These cases have shed light on Canada’s right-to-die laws, which critics argue are being misused to punish the poorest and sickest.

Most Canadians support euthanasia, and the advocacy group Dying With Dignity says the procedure is “driven by compassion, an end to suffering and discrimination and desire for personal autonomy.” However, more and more poor people are dying by euthanasia as their miserable living situation worsens their illnesses. Since the MAiD Act came into force in 2016, its use has increased yearly.

There have been numerous instances where people sought to be killed because they were not getting adequate government support to live. Human rights experts have blasted Canadian authorities for their inaction over this matter.

Euthanasia “cannot be a default for Canada’s failure to fulfill its human rights obligations,” said Marie-Claude Landry, the head of the Human Rights Commission of Canada.

Landry said she shares the “grave concern” voiced last year by three UN human rights experts, who stated that Canada’s euthanasia law appeared to violate the United Nation’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The experts commented that the law had a “discriminatory impact” on disabled people and was inconsistent with Canada’s obligations to uphold international human rights standards.

 

Landry called for social and economic rights to be enshrined in Canadian law to ensure that people can get adequate housing, healthcare, and support.

“In an era where we recognize the right to die with dignity, we must do more to guarantee the right to live with dignity,” said the human rights expert.

Some data in this regard:

From 2016 to December 2021, there were more than 31,000 assisted deaths in Canada.Last year there were 10,000 euthanasia deaths in Canada.Of that total, 1,740 people in Canada requested and were granted euthanasia solely because they were suffering from loneliness and isolation.Suicides associated with a lack of medical and psychiatric care must also be considered. By providing euthanasia to poor people suffering from illnesses, the government is killing them first so they do not commit suicide themselves.Assisted deaths constitute 3% of the total number of deaths in Canada per year.

[…]

Via https://orinocotribune.com/euthanasia-used-in-canada-to-get-rid-of-poorest-people/

G20 Leaders Announce Your Freedoms Are Over: Vaccine Passports Coming

Celia Farber

G20 – BREAKING: leaders have just signed a declaration which states that vaccine passports will be adopted to “facilitate” all international travel

This means any vaccination the WHO determines you should have.

Changing your rights & freedoms forever.

Silence from the media. pic.twitter.com/0pHISCcVaM

— Bernie's Tweets (@BernieSpofforth) November 17, 2022

[…]

BILL GATES – “People act like they have a choice”

He wasn’t joking he was warning you. The declaration by the G20 will attempt to ensure you all comply! With whatever they determine.

pic.twitter.com/5fczGe4CZz

— Bernie's Tweets (@BernieSpofforth) November 17, 2022

[…]

Via https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/4dc

Elon Musk Purges Thousands More Twitter Employees – No One Notices The Difference

Zero Hedge

A good measure of the value of an employee to a company is if their absence makes things more difficult for everyone else, or their absence is barely noticed.  If an employee makes no difference and adds no value then there is no point in keeping them around.

Twitter is quickly becoming a blaring example of this issue.  Alleged leaks from within the company suggest that most employees under previous management barely worked and are devout “communists” (Ed: ??? from what I read, they were more likely ex-FBI or ex-CIA agents and I sincerely doubt they self-identify as communists) with a hatred of free speech.  The leaks also claim that Twitter employees were far more concerned with censoring anti-establishment voices than doing their jobs.

From comments made on social media by employees since Musk’s takeover, it appears that these rumors are correct.

For many years now Twitter has operated less like a company and more like a cult compound for liberal ideologues, with free lunches, yoga rooms, smoothie bars, wine bars, expresso bars, and minimal work buffered by pointless meetings and near zero productivity. The company runs a collectivist daycare for overgrown children; 7500 of them along with 5500 outside contractors.

Musk fired at least 3500 primary staff members and it is also recently reported that he has purged at least 4500 outside contractors, many of them moderators tasked with filtering “misinformation”.  Interestingly, Twitter users have not noticed much of a difference in terms of functionality for the platform despite the mass layoffs.  The only difference has been the ability to speak more freely.

Initial reports of the firings led people to speculate that Musk’s actions might be “heavy handed” and that, surely, a lot of employees have nothing to do with the politically motivated side of the platform.  However, employee comments suggest that an internal agenda to sabotage the site is underway, justified by purely political ideals, as well as angry reactions to basic responsibilities such as showing up to work for 40 hours a week.  Musk’s call for free speech on the platform has also elicited a flurry of vitriol, not only from former Twitter management but also a host of average workers.

The mainstream media argues that Musk’s firings of employees attacking his takeover is hypocritical because it runs contrary to his free speech ideals.  This is a rather ignorant notion often employed by liberals as a means to undermine otherwise logical and legitimate measures by free speech advocates to protect themselves from subversion.  Employees on the job do not have free speech rights, and are not protected from being fired if their goal is to throw a monkey wrench into the company’s functionality or survivability.

[…[

Via https://www.zerohedge.com/political/elon-musk-purges-thousands-more-twitter-employees-no-one-notices-difference

 

 

 

What Doesn’t Fauci Want Us to Know? We May Soon Find Out.

By Dr. Joseph Mercola

A federal court has ruled that Dr. Anthony Fauci and other government officials must testify under oath about whether they colluded with Big Tech to censor certain users and viewpoints.

Story at a glance:

In the summer of 2022, a lawsuit was filed by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana against the federal government, including Dr. Anthony Fauci.The lawsuit alleges that the U.S. government colluded with Big Tech giants Twitter, Meta (Facebook), YouTube, Instagram and LinkedIn to censor certain viewpoints by labeling them “misinformation” or “disinformation.”In September 2022, a federal judge ordered Fauci and other officials to turn over emails with five social media firms.Now, a federal court has taken it a step further, ruling that Fauci and other officials must testify under oath at depositions about whether they colluded with Big Tech to censor certain users.The suit gives multiple examples of Fauci’s roles in the suppression of free speech, including that related to the lab leak theory of COVID-19’s origin, COVID-19 shots and the efficiency of masks and COVID-19 lockdowns.

Restriction of free speech excelled during the COVID-19 pandemic, when efforts to shut down public discussions and information that countered the official narrative were in full force.

In the summer of 2022, a lawsuit was filed by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana against the federal government, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

The lawsuit alleges that the U.S. government colluded with Big Tech giants Twitter, Meta (Facebook), YouTube, Instagram and LinkedIn to censor certain viewpoints by labeling them “misinformation” or “disinformation.”

In September 2022, a federal judge ordered Fauci and other officials to turn over emails with five social media firms.

Fauci initially refused, stating that the communications were protected by executive privilege. However, the judge ordered that the documents be turned over within 21 days nonetheless. Fauci was also ordered to answer questions posed by the plaintiffs in full.

[…]

Now, a federal court has taken it a step further, ruling that Fauci and other officials must testify under oath at depositions about whether they colluded with Big Tech to censor certain users.

U.S. government accused of suppressing free speech

The original lawsuit was filed in May 2022 by Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt and Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry.

What was the government trying to hide?

[…]

Several examples are given of suppression of free speech. Among them:

The Hunter Biden laptop story prior to the 2020 presidential election — Evidence found on Hunter’s laptop suggests he helped secure “millions in funding” for Metabiota, a U.S. contractor in Ukraine “specializing in deadly pathogen research,” which is what the Russian government had claimed during a press conference March 24.

In addition, one of Metabiota’s investors is Rosemont Seneca, an investment fund co-managed by Hunter Biden.

Metabiota is also a core partner in the USAID PREDICT program, which funded laboratory equipment for the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China through grants to the EcoHealth Alliance and Shi Zhengli, a top coronavirus researcher at the WIV, also worked with PREDICT.

[…]

Speech about the lab leak theory of COVID-19’s origin — The plaintiffs allege that Fauci censored “speech backed by great scientific credibility and with enormous potential nationwide impact.”

This includes information that COVID-19 was the result of a lab leak in Wuhan, China.

[…]

Speech about the efficiency of masks and COVID-19 lockdowns — Two plaintiffs in the case, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and Dr. Martin Kulldorff, co-authored the Great Barrington Declaration, which scientifically critiqued the effects of prolonged lockdowns in response to COVID-19.

Collins sent an email to Fauci stating, “There needs to be a quick and devastating published take-down of its premises.”

In response, Fauci began to publicly criticize the Declaration, calling it “total nonsense” and “ridiculous.”

The New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA), which is part of the lawsuit, representing Bhattacharya and Kulldorff, stated:

[…]

Fauci ordered to testify under oath[…]

In addition to Fauci, other officials ordered to testify include:

Former White House press secretary Jen PsakiDirector of White House Digital Strategy Rob FlahertySurgeon General Dr. Vivek MurthyCISA director Jen EasterlyFBI Supervisory special agent Elvis Chan

The depositions will cover many examples of a collusive relationship uncovered by the email exchanges.

Another example includes former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson, who was also a victim of the censorship hysteria; his Twitter account was suspended when he posted this scientifically accurate information about COVID-19 shots:

“It doesn’t stop infection. Or transmission. Don’t think of it as a vaccine. Think of it — at best — as a therapeutic with a limited window of efficacy and terrible side effect profile that must be dosed IN ADVANCE OF ILLNESS. And we want to mandate it? Insanity.”

Berenson filed a lawsuit against Twitter for labeling the tweet as misleading and canceling his account.

The case has since been resolved, with Twitter acknowledging that the tweets should not have led to a suspension.

When his account was reinstated, Berenson tweeted the exact same message, which this time escaped Twitter’s “misinformation” flag.

However, it’s now been revealed that Fauci was involved in Berenson’s suspension.

According to the plaintiffs’ joint statement, “Dr. Fauci publicly described Berenson’s opinions on vaccines as ‘horrifying.’ President Biden followed Dr. Fauci’s steps and made a statement that ‘They’re killing people’ by not censoring vaccine ‘misinformation,’ to which Twitter subsequently permanently suspended Berenson from its platform.”

Will the truth finally be heard?

The request for depositions gave three reasons why Fauci, specifically, should be questioned under oath:

1. He refused to verify under oath his own interrogatory responses; instead, NIAID responses were verified by Dr. Jill Harper, who was not named in the complaint. Fauci has made no statements under oath regarding his communications with social media platforms.

2. Even if Fauci can prove he didn’t communicate with social media platforms, “there are compelling reasons that suggest Dr. Fauci has acted through intermediaries, and acted on behalf of others, in procuring the social-media censorship of credible scientific opinions.”

3. Fauci’s credibility on matters related to COVID-19 “misinformation” has been in question since 2020.On Aug. 22, Fauci announced he will resign from his roles as director of the NIAID — a position he’s held for 38 years — and chief medical adviser to the White House, come December.

[…]

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/anthony-fauci-big-tech-collusion-cola/