Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 423
May 7, 2023
WHO Warns ‘Huge Biological Risk’ Threatens Public Health After Sudan Fighters Occupy Lab Carrying Deadly Diseases
Stringer/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images By
Brandon Drey
World Health Organization officials warned Tuesday that an “extremely, extremely dangerous” situation threatens public health after fighters in conflict-ravaged Sudan occupied a central national laboratory carrying samples of deadly diseases, including polio and cholera.
“There is a huge biological risk associated with the occupation of the central public health lab… by one of the fighting parties,” Nima Saeed Abid, the WHO’s representative in Sudan, told reporters in Geneva, observed by The Daily Mail.
Hundreds of civilians and paramilitary forces were killed or injured in a series of airstrikes in Khartoum last week as the Sudanese army bombed positions held by the country’s RSF paramilitary group in a power struggle that some international observers fear could ignite a full-blown civil war.
Abid said fighters took over the Khartoum laboratory in the African country and “kicked out all the technicians from the lab… which is completely under the control of one of the fighting parties as a military base,” NBC reported. However, the health official did not specify which of the two warring factions gained control of the public health facility.
Abid sounded the alarm, noting that the lab carries a range of deadly diseases, including measles, polio, and cholera while warning chemical and bio-risk hazards also pose a high risk due to a lack of functioning generators.
The head of Khartoum’s national lab reportedly broke the news to Abid on Monday via phone call, one day before both military groups agreed to a 72-hour ceasefire following “intense” negotiations brokered by U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken.
[Ed: See CDC, DOD, Fauci Funded Sudan Biolab Seized by Militants]
WHO Warns ‘Huge Biological Risk’ Threatens Public Health After Sudan Fighters Occupy Lab Carrying Deadly Diseases
Stringer/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images By
Brandon Drey
World Health Organization officials warned Tuesday that an “extremely, extremely dangerous” situation threatens public health after fighters in conflict-ravaged Sudan occupied a central national laboratory carrying samples of deadly diseases, including polio and cholera.
“There is a huge biological risk associated with the occupation of the central public health lab… by one of the fighting parties,” Nima Saeed Abid, the WHO’s representative in Sudan, told reporters in Geneva, observed by The Daily Mail.
Hundreds of civilians and paramilitary forces were killed or injured in a series of airstrikes in Khartoum last week as the Sudanese army bombed positions held by the country’s RSF paramilitary group in a power struggle that some international observers fear could ignite a full-blown civil war.
Abid said fighters took over the Khartoum laboratory in the African country and “kicked out all the technicians from the lab… which is completely under the control of one of the fighting parties as a military base,” NBC reported. However, the health official did not specify which of the two warring factions gained control of the public health facility.
Abid sounded the alarm, noting that the lab carries a range of deadly diseases, including measles, polio, and cholera while warning chemical and bio-risk hazards also pose a high risk due to a lack of functioning generators.
The head of Khartoum’s national lab reportedly broke the news to Abid on Monday via phone call, one day before both military groups agreed to a 72-hour ceasefire following “intense” negotiations brokered by U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken.
[Ed: See CDC, DOD, Fauci Funded Sudan Biolab Seized by Militants]
Ex-Russian space boss questions US Moon landing
Dmitry Rogozin. © Sputnik/Sergey Mamontov
Dmitry Rogozin says while many in Roscosmos defended Washington’s version of events, no one could produce irrefutable proof
The former head of Russia’s Roscosmos space agency, Dmitry Rogozin, has expressed doubt the US Apollo 11 mission really landed on the Moon in 1969, saying he has yet to see conclusive proof.
In a post on his Telegram channel on Sunday, Rogozin said he began his personal quest for the truth “about ten years ago” when he was still working in the Russian government, and that he grew skeptical about whether the Americans had actually set foot on the Moon when he compared how exhausted Soviet cosmonauts looked upon returning from their flights, and how seemingly unaffected the Apollo 11 crew was by contrast.
Rogozin said he sent requests for evidence to Roscosmos at the time. All he received in response was a book featuring Soviet Cosmonaut Aleksey Leonov’s account of how he talked to the American astronauts and how they told him they had been on the Moon.
The former official wrote that he continued with his efforts when he was appointed head of Roscosmos in 2018. However, according to Rogozin, no evidence was presented to him. Instead, several unnamed academics angrily criticized him for undermining the “sacred cooperation with NASA,” he claimed.
The former Roscosmos chief also said he had “received an angry phone call from a top-ranking official” who supposedly accused him of complicating international relations.
Rogozin concluded by saying he still cannot believe that the US was able to pull off the feat, but is now unable to, despite the incredible progress in technology since the late 1960s.
What he claims to have found out, however, was that Washington has “its people in [the Russian] establishment.”
Apollo 11 was the first manned mission to the Moon, with Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin going down in history as the first humans to walk on the lunar surface.
The flight was preceded by the unmanned Soviet Luna 2 program, which blazed the trail for Moon exploration.
Last April, President Vladimir Putin pledged to resume Russia’s lunar program.
[…]
Via https://swentr.site/russia/575937-roscosmos-rogozin-us-moon-landing-proof/
Canadian military blocked doctors from reporting covid jab injuries
Dr Eddy Betterman
It has come to light that the reason Canadian doctors were not allowed to report serious injuries caused by Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” is because the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) ordered them not to.
According to Catherine Christensen, an attorney and founder of Valour Law and the Valour Legal Action Centre for military law, evidence has emerged to prove that the Canadian military, under the leadership of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, conspired to withhold the truth about covid jab injuries and deaths from the public.
“I have military doctors who provided sworn evidence that they were told not to report vaccine injuries, or if they asked how [to report], they were told, ‘just be quiet,’” Christensen revealed at an April 26 National Citizens Inquiry (NCI) hearing in Red Deer, Alberta.
(Related: Trudeau’s covid jab mandates set in motion the collapse of the North American automobile industry.)
One Canadian military medical doctor and captain was told directly to NOT report covid jab injuriesThe NCI is currently in the process of evaluating Canada’s response to the covid “pandemic” and its effect on the health of Canadian citizens, as well as their freedom and social and economic well-being.
At the conference in question, Christensen represented 360 soldiers in the CAF who were directly and negatively impacted by the Canadian military’s covid jab mandate, which is similar to the one the Biden regime forced on American soldiers.
Christensen revealed at the conference that the CAF chose to ignore all covid jab injuries while purposely not tracking the health issues that emerged among soldiers who were forced to get injected.
Many of these soldiers have since developed serious health issues like Guillain-Barre Syndrome, or GBS, a relatively rare neurological disease that causes damage to nerve cells.
“They were told to diagnose them as other things, such as Guillain-Barre Syndrome [GBS], when young men were collapsing in the shower after injections,” Christensen stated, adding and clarifying that these soldiers “were vaccine injured.”
Furthermore, the CAF miscategorized soldiers’ medical records by failing – more like refusing – to categorize all covid jab injuries. Christensen says she has “more people in [her] files with vaccine injuries that are officially listed as vaccine injured.”
After speaking with and receiving sworn testimony from numerous Canadian military servicemembers who reported covid “vaccine “injuries, Christensen is convinced that this was a deliberate coverup of the truth, ultimately tracing back to the Trudeau regime.
“I believe the CAF was not tracking the number and type of vaccine-related injuries for the Covid-19 vaccine,” Christensen stated.
The CAF did release data on April 17 showing that a total of 375,000 covid jabs were administered to members of the CAF. Of this number, 0.09 percent, officially, reported “an adverse effect of some kind following their first, second or booster dose(s),” the data report states.
“The majority of these reported adverse effects were minor and self-resolving in nature,” the CAF claims.
Of those injuries officially reported between Jan. 7, 2021, and Feb. 1, 2023, the CAF says that 316 were considered “non-serious” with only 26 being categorized as “serious.” Of these 316 injury cases, nine were officially recorded as myocarditis or pericarditis.
These figures are far too low, according to Christensen, who maintains that there are thousands of CAF members who have been left seriously injured by Trudeau’s mandatory covid injection scheme – though the vast majority of these injuries are being ignored by the government.
“And what happens to those who followed the orders and took the injections and are now permanently disabled? Veterans Affairs Canada [VAC] is telling them no, not service-related,” Christensen added in her testimony.
“Once again, veterans will face a procedural system that fails them or forces them to go to court for deserved compensation.”
[…]
Via https://dreddymd.com/2023/05/07/canadian-military-blocked-doctors-reporting-covid-jab-injuries/
May 6, 2023
How to Fight for Covid Truth
Guy Hatchard
TCW
EVERY day brings more news of extreme efforts to promote biotech vaccines and cancel those asking questions.
For example Dr Mark Tykocinski, an immunologist with a spotless academic record who is president of Thomas Jefferson University in Philadelphia may be about to lose his job. His sole mistake appears to be liking tweets by former New York Times journalist Alex Berenson who questions vaccine safety.
British MP Andrew Bridgen has been expelled from the Conservative Party. According to Bridgen, a senior UK politician has privately admitted to him that he may well be right about Covid vaccine harms, but said the government is expecting to suppress public information about Covid vaccine adverse effects for the next 20 years, citing ‘lack of political appetite’ for a public disclosure.
Statistician Professor Norman Fenton was locked out of his Twitter account following a complaint that he had broken German law by claiming Covid data manipulation was creating the appearance of vaccine efficacy, when in fact there was none. The German government is the main sponsor of BioNTech, the co-creator of the Pfizer mRNA Covid vaccine. Fortunately the complaint was not upheld and Fenton was reinstated.
Te Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand) has announced that from May 1, pregnant people (!) aged 16 to 29 years can now get an additional Covid-19 booster. They don’t seem to have noticed that stillbirths and miscarriages rose following the Covid vaccine rollout, or the absence of any data to confirm ‘safety’ assurances for pregnant women – quite the reverse, in fact.(See this article.) Is it possible that the NZ government have a lot of boosters left over after a poor response to their latest bivalent vaccine campaign and are now trying to offload them via deceptive advertising to mothers who naturally want to do the best for their child?
Highly vaccinated Portugal has seen a 73 per cent rise in emergency callouts for heart attacks. This mirrors the 83 per cent rise in heart attack hospitalisation in Wellington, NZ.
The continuing attacks from the media and vaccine advocates mean that some people must be seriously worried that the scientific data about vaccine harms is beginning to resonate with a wider audience. We are winning the argument.
Last week I reported correspondence from our Minister of Statistics Dr Deborah Russell MP in which she downplayed the significance of rising excess deaths in New Zealand. This appeared to be the result of misinformed policy rather than real statistics. Does the New Zealand government, in line with the UK, wish to hide Covid vaccine adverse effect statistics from the public until it becomes a matter of distant history? You tell me.
Should we be protesting on the streets?
In fact both the vaccinated and unvaccinated have been injured by government policy and experimental biotechnology. Even the pro-vaccine, pro-zoonotic origin NY Times has conceded that evidence is mounting that Covid came from a lab leak. We have a common cause.
It would certainly suit those who wish the pandemic gravy train and the biotech boom to continue, if the population were to remain polarised and the adverse effects hidden. At this time, it is my belief that launching ad hominem attacks, participating in lawful protests or expressing violent sentiments (never a good idea) will simply play into the hands of those from the media, corporates, medical professions and governments who are hoping that public concern can continue to be managed, marginalised and cancelled.
But this doesn’t mean remaining silent, we should be raising our voices and using our pens. I do believe we should always talk rationally and factually about issues that matter. This is an election year in New Zealand, when there is a higher chance of being heard. We can talk to candidates and demand answers, or even become candidates. In an election year, politicians know that all votes will matter. We can raise a voice of reasoned intelligence, express ourselves calmly, cite research, and send letters to our politicians. Politicians cannot find papers to back their views; published research is now firmly on our side of the debate. Our points are cannot be dismissed.
[…]
Via https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/how-to-fight-for-covid-truth/
Groups that aggressively lobbied for covid jab mandates were funded by, you guessed it: PFIZER
Dr Eddy Betterman
A big reason why much of the country systematically and all in tandem decided to mandate Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccination” on millions of Americans is because Pfizer bribed various organizations to lobby for this tyranny.
Recently unearthed financial disclosures show that the Chicago Urban League (CUL), as one example, took in a $100,000 “grant” from Pfizer under the designation of a “vaccine safety and effectiveness campaign.”
CUL President Karen Freeman-Wilson infamously stated back in August of 2021 that the benefits of getting forcibly jabbed with Pfizer’s mRNA covid shots “far outweighs” any potential concerns about taking the experimental drug against one’s will.
That very same month, another group called the National Consumers League (NCL) came out with similar support for the government’s injection mandates.
“In recent weeks, it has become evident that employer mandates are effective at nudging reluctant people to get the Covid-19 vaccine,” NCL said in a statement, likewise failing to disclose a $75,000 check it received from Pfizer in the third quarter of 2021 for “vaccine policy efforts.”
American Academy of Pediatrics collected a quarter million dollars from Pfizer before requiring all health care workers to get jabbed for covid
Perhaps even more offensive is the position the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) took that same year when it decided to mandate Fauci Flu shots for all health care workers across the country.
It turns out that the AAP accepted a $250,000 cash payment from Pfizer in 2021 that immediately preceded the organization’s push for universal covid jab mandates, which it claimed would curb transmission and “cases” of the Fauci Flu.
At one point, a cohort of three- and four-letter organizations signed a joint letter that was presented to the Biden regime, calling on it to impose covid jab mandates on private employers with 100 or more workers.
The organizations that signed this letter include the American Pharmacists Association, the American College of Preventive Medicine, the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy, the American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American College of Emergency Physicians, all of which likewise took in “grants” from Pfizer in exchange for their promotion of a universal covid jab mandate.
Another group called the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) joined the others in calling for covid jab mandates for all health care workers. A few months after going public with this push, the AAFP received a $249,000 check from Pfizer, which was earmarked for a “collaborative consumer vaccine awareness and educational campaign.”
Then there was the American Osteopathic Association, which received $150,000 from Pfizer for “primary care physicians addressing Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy” in late 2021. Naturally, this group also called for all health care workers to be forcibly injected for the Wuhan Flu.
That same year, the National Hispanic Medical Association (NHMA) received just $30,000 from the Biotechnology Innovation Organization, which according to an IRS filing lobbies for pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer. In exchange for this money, the NHMA signed onto a joint statement calling for all health care personnel to be forced to get covid-jabbed.
The first journalist to report on the financial ties between all of these groups and Pfizer was Lee Fang, who was told by Dr. Aaron Kheriaty, director of the Bioethics and American Democracy Program at the Ethics and Public Policy Center that “pharmaceutical companies spend very large portions of their budgets on marketing, including on various health care organizations and third parties, and they do that because they get a return on that investment.”
[…]
Via https://dreddymd.com/2023/05/06/groups-aggressively-lobbied-covid-jab-mandates-funded-by-pfizer/
Jamaica Aims to Gain Independence From the British Monarchy
Jamaican Minister of Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Marlene Malahoo Forte. May, 5, 2023. | Photo: Twitter/@radio580nic
Newsletter“While the UK celebrates the coronation of the king, that’s for the UK,” said Jamaica’s minister of legal and constitutional affairs.
The Jamaican government intends to hold a self-determination referendum in 2024 to become independent of the British monarchy and have its own head of state.
“The time has come. Jamaica is in Jamaica’s hands. We have to do it, especially with the transition in the monarchy. My government says we have to do it now,” Jamaican Minister of Legal and Constitutional Affairs, Marlene Malahoo Forte, told the media.
“While the United Kingdom celebrates the coronation of the king, that is for the United Kingdom,” Malahoo Forte said. The coronation of King Charles III will be held on May 6 in London.
According to the minister, Jamaica intends to draft a new constitution and hold an urgent referendum on self-determination as soon as possible, in 2024. In this way, it seeks to become fully independent of the United Kingdom and thus have its own head of state.
‘Time to say goodbye’ to British crown – Jamaican minister
The former colony will also seek reparations from the monarchy, legal minister Marlene Malahoo Forte has saidhttps://t.co/y38tBjJEIe pic.twitter.com/ut6CNXUkX1
— RT (@RT_com) May 5, 2023
How Corporate Greed Destroyed East Palestine
How Corporate Greed Destroyed East Palestine
Directed by J T Chapman (2023)
Film Review
This film explores the turbo charged profit-seeing by Norfolk Southern and other rail monopolies that is directly responsible for the February East Palestine train disaster.
On February 3 2023, a 50-car train derailment resulted in the toxic contamination of East Palestine’s air, water (killing 43,000 fish and aquatic animals) and soil with the carcinogen vinyl chloride. After several of the rail cars caught fire, officials ordered an immediate evacuation of all residents. As rail cars continued to burn, on February 6 Ohio governor Mike DeWine authorized a “controlled burn” to prevent the remaining vinyl chloride from exploding. This, in turn, released an immense toxic plume covering all of East Palestine.
On February 8, residents were allowed to return but advised to drink bottled water. The film is highly critical of DeWine for his failure to issue a disaster declaration to bring in federal resources to help with the clean up. Instead he left Norfolk Southern, which placed higher priority on replacing damaged tracks and getting its trains running, in charge of the clean up.
Owing to large quantities of VOCs (volatile organic compounds) released by the controlled burn and the open aeration pumps* used to clean East Palestine’s contaminated creeks, many returning residents complained of nausea, headaches, rashes, light headedness, burning eyes and tingling lips. Because VOCs stick to everything, they were instructed to throw away all their plastic products and deep clean everything else.
Norfolk South paid every East Palestine resident a $1,000 inconvenience payment for hotel and meal expense during the evacuation. At the time of filming, the railroad was still negotiating a blanket settlement amounting to $212 per person to cover long term medical costs and plummeting property values.
The filmmaker devotes the last half of the film explaining Precision Scheduled Railroading (PSR), which has enabled railroads to double their profits and which many analysts blame for the steep increase in toxic train derailments. The purpose of PSR is to reduce railroad operating costs below 60% of revenues. This, in turn, guarantees a 40% surplus for executive pay and shareholder dividends (plus $10 billion in stock buybacks to increase share prices).
Railroads accomplish these savings by shrinking their work force and running longer trains (some 2-3 miles long). In 2015 alone, the railroads laid off 30% of their workforce (45,000 workers), The longer trains are harder to stop and to inspect (especially with fewer workers). There are also increasing incidents of railroads pressuring workers to perform work for which they are unqualified, work while sick, work mandatory overtime and refrain from reporting dangerous incidents.
In addition to their increasing pressure on a shrinking workforce, railroads (as well as the chemical and oil industry) also engage in heavy lobbying against federal proposals to require stricter maintenance and safer ECP (electronically controlled pneumatic) brakes on all dangerous chemical trains. Pete Buttigieg claims he’s powerless to better regulate the railroads’ so-called “bomb trains.” This is untrue. With the rule making authority he enjoys as Secretary of Transportation, there’s no reason he can’t bring back Obama administration rules that label trains carrying carcinogens as “dangerous trains” and require them to install ECP brakes.
*Unless performed inside a closed filtration system, open aeration acts to increase air contamination.
May 5, 2023
The Fight to Ban Meat – Is It Really About the Environment?
Dr Mercola
Story at-a-glanceMeat has been a celebrated food staple since the dawn of mankind. Never has anyone needed to justify the eating of animal protein — until nowAccording to the global cabal that is working toward a complete monopoly of the food supply, the eating of meat is at the core of manmade climate change and has to stopIn addition to calls for an outright ban on meat consumption, other coercive strategies have also been proposed, such as changing agricultural subsidies and trade laws, changing diets in hospitals and schools, adding warning labels, education (read, propaganda) and various taxes, including specific taxes on meat and more generalized carbon taxesAccording to researchers at Oxford University, meat and dairy production are responsible for 60% of the greenhouse gas emissions produced by the agricultural sector. They also claim cattle use 83% of available farmland while delivering only 18% of calories and 37% of dietary proteinBut environmental concerns cannot be the only consideration. Human health must also be considered, and researchers warn we know virtually nothing about the long-term health effects of cultured and plant-based meat alternatives. One recent investigation discovered that plant-based meats contain high amounts of antinutrients that prevent your body’s absorption of minerals such as iron and zinc, which could result in problematic nutritional deficienciesMeat has been a celebrated food staple since the dawn of mankind.1 Never has anyone needed to justify the eating of animal protein — until now. According to the globalist cabal that is working toward a complete monopoly of the food supply, the eating of meat is at the core of manmade climate change and must stop in order to “save the planet.”
Back in September 2019, a British barrister (trial attorney) went so far as to call for new laws to ban the eating of meat to protect the environment, and as time goes on, this kind of insanity will likely only intensify.
[…]
Aside from an outright ban on meat consumption, a number of other coercive strategies have also been proposed, such as changing agricultural subsidies and trade laws, changing diets in hospitals and schools, adding warning labels, education (read, propaganda) and implementing various taxes, including specific taxes on meat and more generalized carbon taxes.3
Human Health To Be Sacrificed for the EnvironmentThe Guardian cited research4,5,6 from Oxford University, published in the summer of 2018, which claimed meat and dairy production are responsible for 60% of the greenhouse gas emissions produced by the agricultural sector, and that cattle use 83% of available farmland while delivering only 18% of calories and 37% of dietary protein.
Environmental concerns cannot be the only consideration. Human health must also be taken into account, and researchers warn we know virtually nothing about the long-term health effects of cultured and plant-based meat alternatives.[…]But are environmental concerns the only valid factor in this equation? What about human health? Is it reasonable to intentionally doom all of humanity to poor health and low cognition just because a small power-hungry cabal claims food production has a detrimental climate impact?
Many of the activities pursued by these globalists have detrimental impacts on the environment, but you don’t see them addressing those. Instead, they’re going after food!
The most infuriating part of this debate is the fact that human and environmental health can be simultaneously optimized. If the global cabal really had good intentions, they’d incentivize farmers to transition to regenerative farming practices and holistic livestock management.
[…]
But no, regenerative farming is not even part of the discussion. It’s being intentionally ignored, and that’s how you know the globalists have no intention of solving an actual problem. Their intention is to control the food supply by making sure all foods are patentable and owned by them.
Study Warns: Meat Ban Would Harm Human HealthOn the other side of this debate, we have research7 showing that removing meat and dairy from the human diet would result in significant harm to health.
[…]
Indeed, as noted in this paper,9 human anatomy, digestion and metabolism indicates that the human race is not only compatible with but also reliant upon relatively substantial meat intake, and disconnecting the entire population from our evolutionary dietary patterns raises rather than lowers the risk for nutrient deficiencies and chronic diseases.
Meat Is More Than the Sum of Individual NutrientsWe already know that the preponderance of processed food in the Western diet is responsible for our current disease burden and removing one of the few remaining whole foods — meat — will undoubtedly only worsen the situation.
Specific nutrients found in meat that are not easily obtained in meat-free diets include B vitamins, especially vitamin B12, retinol, long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, iron and zinc in bioavailable forms, taurine, creatine and carnosine, all of which have important health functions.
[…]
We Have a Manmade Problem AlrightWe do have a manmade problem, but it’s not climate change per se. The problem is that food production has been bastardized. In an April 24, 2023, article in The Scotsman,11 columnist Philip Lymbery shares memories of a trip through Italy’s agricultural valley.
While touring “pretty villages,” “endless pastures and crop fields,” he quickly realized that something was missing: Livestock. Not once did he see a farm animal anywhere. The picturesque pastures were all empty.
[…]
Even foods advertised as being made from “grass fed” cows, such as Italy’s famous Parmigiano Reggiano Parmesan cheese, were raised indoors.
[…]
Another fact Lymbery discovered during his travels through Italy was that crop fields are primarily dedicated to growing animal feed, not human food. These kinds of practices are what’s having a detrimental effect on the environment. It’s factory farming that is the problem, not farming or food production in general. As mentioned earlier, the solution is regenerative farming and holistic husbandry, Not more processed fake foods.
Fake Meats Are Not a Viable Replacement for Real MeatVideo LinkAs detailed in “Red Meat Is Not a Health Risk,” research has demonstrated that unprocessed red meat poses a very low risk for adverse health effects, if any. On the other hand, cultured meat operations are significant producers of CO2 emissions and plant-based meats have been shown to inhibit mineral absorption in humans.
Both of these meat alternatives are also ultraprocessed,12 and may therefore cause the same kind of health deterioration as other processed foods. Obesity,13 Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer and depression are but a few examples of conditions known to be promoted and exacerbated by a processed food diet.14,15,16,17,18
In December 2022, Swedish researchers warned that plant-based meat alternatives have very high phytate levels — antinutrients that inhibit the absorption of minerals in the human body. As a result, while the meat substitute may appear to contain many of the necessary nutrients, such as iron, your body cannot absorb them. That plant-based meat alternatives may therefore result in health-robbing nutrient deficiencies is wholly predictable.
[…]
Executive Order Lays Foundation for Lab-Created FoodsGovernment leaders, however, appear wholly ignorant of the risks involved with a wholesale transition from real, whole food to processed and synthetic alternatives.
In September 2022, U.S. President Joe Biden signed an “Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation for a Sustainable, Safe and Secure American Bioeconomy,”20 which paves the way for biotechnology to take over food production.
In late March 2023, Biden further expanded on this premise in a “Bold Goals for U.S. Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing” report.21 According to this plan, the food industry is to be led by biotech, and the “improvements” we can look forward to are more lab-grown meats and bioengineered plant foods. A similar plan is also detailed in the U.K.’s Genetic Technology and Precision Breeding Act of 2023.22
[…]
Among the many problems with this plan is the fact that taxpayers will now be paying for government’s funding of private corporations involved in the fake food industry. The end result is highly predictable. What we’ll have is a repeat of what happened with farm subsidies.
Rather than subsidizing the most nutritious foods, government farm subsidies go almost exclusively to large monoculture farms growing genetically engineered corn, soy and other basic ingredients used in processed foods. As a result, the processed food industry has grown on our dime while public health has deteriorated.
The same thing will happen here. Instead of investing in regenerative agriculture, the government is backing a whole new industry of fake foods, from lab-grown meats to large-scale insect production. Meanwhile, safety data for plant-based meats, synthetic cultured meats and insect proteins are sorely lacking.
[…]
Ultraprocessed Foods Are Anything But ‘Green’Ultraprocessed foods are also completely counterproductive to environmentally “green” and sustainable goals. For example, ultraprocessed foods already account for 17% to 39% of total diet-related energy use, 36% to 45% of total diet-related biodiversity loss and up to one-third of total diet-related greenhouse gas emissions.29
So, how is expanding the manufacturing and consumption of even more ultraprocessed foods going to lower greenhouse gas emissions?
[…]
And, for all the lip service paid to “equity,” increasing consumption of processed foods will worsen economic inequalities, as it redirects money away from small farmers and independent homesteaders to transnational corporations that rely on underpaid workers.
[…]
Via https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2023/05/05/will-meat-be-banned/
#ExitTheWHO – Sign the Health Freedom Bill of Rights
The World Health Organization (WHO) AND the United Nations (U.N.) are in the midst of attempting unprecedented global takeovers of public health that will change our future if we do not join together and stop them.
Right now, the WHO is amending the International Health Regulations (IHR) and drafting a “Pandemic Treaty,” aka WHO CA+. These documents create the legal framework for the WHO to declare public health emergencies at will and then manage global public health in response.
It also gives the WHO authority over pandemic preparedness, which includes extensive surveillance of people and animals to identify outbreaks early and allows the WHO to act as the single authority for infectious disease mitigation, prevention and treatment protocols for anything they deem a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).
In other words, the WHO would become “the world’s doctor, medical czar,” control the public health narrative and censor opposing viewpoints.
Simultaneous actions by the U.N. are underway, with it recently announcing it is seeking the power to manage global emergencies.
Join us in resisting this global pandemic response by signing the Health Freedom Bill of Rights below. Sign to let the WHO and the U.N. know that we are paying attention and will not comply with this consolidation of power at the hands of global unelected leaders.
Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/community-forum/health-freedom-bill-of-rights/
The Most Revolutionary Act
- Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's profile
- 11 followers
