Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 393
July 18, 2023
Jim Jordan Considers Holding Zuckerberg in Contempt of Congress
The Hill
House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) is considering holding Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg in contempt of Congress, a source familiar with the situation confirmed to The Hill Monday.
Fox Business was the first to report on Jordan’s potential move, with sources telling the news outlet Meta has not provided any internal communications on its censorship processes.
Zuckerberg was among five tech company heads who received subpoenas in February from the House Judiciary panel to turn over “documents and communications relating to the federal government’s reported collusion with Big Tech to suppress free speech,” along with any documents related to their content moderation measures, the committee said at the time.
Jordan previously called the subpoenas “one step to accountability,” as House GOP members ramped up efforts earlier this year to investigate Big Tech.
Zuckerberg testified in Congress in 2018 over GOP concerns that Facebook censored conservative accounts and content.
In a statement to The Hill on Monday, a spokesperson for Meta said it has handed over 50,000 pages of documents in response to the committee’s request, and “have made nearly a dozen current and former employees available to discuss external and internal issues.”
Judge signals December may be too soon for Trump’s classified documents case, but doesn’t set date Milley: Ukraine counteroffensive ‘far from a failure’The spokesperson added Meta does “look forward to continuing to work with the committee moving forward.”
At the time the subpoenas were issued, a spokesperson for Meta said the company had started producing documents.
[…]
House Judiciary Committee Demands Censorship Info From Big Pharma
By Press Release U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) today sent letters to the chief executive officers of Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson and Merck demanding information on how and to what extent the executive branch coerced and colluded with pharmaceutical companies and other intermediaries to censor speech.
The committee is investigating the companies for the role they may have played in this censorship regime.
According to documents obtained by the committee, personnel from Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson and Merck were invited in December 2020 to meet with personnel from other pharmaceutical companies, executive branch agencies and Stanford University to discuss “a coalition to respond to COVID-19 vaccine disinformation.”
The entanglement of executive branch agencies, third-party organizations and technology companies to moderate speech-related content online raises questions about the extent to which these actions affected the civil liberties of American citizens.
Other reporting indicates that the pharmaceutical industry pressured social media platforms to take down posts related to producing low-cost generic vaccines.
Read the letter to Pfizer:
“The Committee on the Judiciary is conducting oversight of how and to what extent the Executive Branch has coerced and colluded with companies and other intermediaries to censor speech.
“Certain entities, including pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer, may have played a role in this censorship regime by determining what types of content constituted ‘misinformation’ — sometimes at the behest of or with the encouragement of the federal government.
“Whether directly or indirectly, a government-approved or -facilitated censorship regime poses a grave threat to the First Amendment and American civil liberties. Accordingly, as part of the Committee’s constitutional oversight obligations, we write to request relevant information and documents.
“According to documents obtained by the Committee, personnel from Pfizer were invited in December 2020 to meet with personnel from other pharmaceutical companies, Executive Branch agencies, and Stanford University to discuss ‘a coalition to respond to COVID-19 vaccine disinformation.’
“The entanglement of Executive Branch agencies, third-party organizations, and technology companies to moderate speech-related content online raises questions about the extent to which these actions affected the civil liberties of American citizens.
“1. All documents and communications, from January 1, 2020 to the present, between or among any employee, contractor, or agent of Pfizer and the Executive Branch of the United States Government referring or relating to the moderation, deletion, suppression, restriction, demonetization, or reduced circulation of content; the accuracy or truth of content; or the attribution of content to the source or participant in a foreign malign or state-sponsored influence operation.
“2. All documents and communications, from January 1, 2020 to the present, between or among any employee, contractor, or agent of Pfizer and any technology company, including social media companies, referring or relating to the moderation, deletion, suppression, restriction, demonetization, or reduced circulation of content; the accuracy or truth of content; or the attribution of content to the source or participant in a foreign malign or state-sponsored influence operation.
“3. A list of employees, contractors, or agents of Pfizer, along with their current and prior titles, who, from January 1, 2020 to the present, have communicated with the Executive Branch of the United States Government regarding the moderation, deletion, suppression, restriction, demonetization, or reduced circulation of content; the accuracy or truth of content; or the attribution of content to the source or participant in a foreign malign or state-sponsored influence operation.
“4. A list of employees, contractors, or agents for Pfizer, along with their current and prior titles, who, from January 1, 2020 to the present, have communicated with any technology company, including social media companies, regarding the moderation, deletion, suppression, restriction, demonetization, or reduced circulation of content; the accuracy or truth of content; or the attribution of content to the source or participant in a foreign malign or state-sponsored influence operation.
“5. A list of all grants, contracts, or any funds received by Pfizer, from January 1, 2020 to the present, from the United States Government, as well as any documents and communications referring or relating to those grants, contracts, or funds, related to Pfizer’s efforts concerning the moderation, deletion, suppression, restriction, demonetization, or reduced circulation of content; the accuracy or truth of content; or the attribution of content to the source or participant in a foreign malign or state-sponsored influence operation.
“Please produce all documents and information as soon as possible but not later than 5:00 p.m. on July 31, 2023. In addition, please treat these discovery obligations as ongoing and applicable to any information generated after receipt of this letter.
“Furthermore, this letter serves as a formal request to preserve all existing and future records and materials relating to the topics addressed in this letter.
“You should construe this preservation notice as an instruction to take all reasonable steps to prevent the destruction or alteration, whether intentionally or negligently, of all documents, communications, and other information, including electronic information and metadata, that are or may be responsive to this congressional inquiry.
“This instruction includes all electronic messages sent using your official and personal accounts or devices, including records created using text messages, phone-based message applications, or encryption software.”
Read the letter to Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla here.
Read the letter to Johnson & Johnson CEO Joaquin Duato here.
Read the letter to Merck & Co., Inc. CEO Robert Davis here.
This press release was published by the House Judiciary Committee.
[…]
Israel: 348% increase in Cardiac Arrest rate, 35% increase in Stroke rate
Seemorerocks
and number of people dying post vaccination.AUSSIE17We now have some new diagnosis data from Israel, which was acquired through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request made by attorney Ori Shabi on May 30th, 2023.
Firstly, we can observe that Cardiac Arrest diagnoses nearly doubled from 2020 to 2021 and more than doubled from 2021 to 2022. This is an extremely concerning trend as it is showing acceleration.
In 2020, there was 1 cardiac arrest per 251,256 population. In 2021, there was 1 cardiac arrest per 130,890 population. In 2022, there was 1 cardiac arrest per 58,275 population.
If this trend continues at approximately 200%, we will see
1 in 29,137 in 2023,
1 in 14,568 in 2024,
1 in 7,284 in 2025, and so on…
Of course, we hope that with fewer people vaccinating now, the trend may reverse.
For clarification, the annual incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Israel varies between 20 and 140 per 100,000 people [SOURCE]. It is important to note that there can be significant discrepancies between population data and health insurance data for several reasons, such as insurance data only including individuals with health insurance coverage. Additionally, variations in definitions (e.g., out-of-hospital cardiac arrests vs. hospital cardiac arrests) can contribute to these discrepancies.
Instead of solely analyzing the numbers, it is more meaningful to examine the trends over time. This approach allows for a better understanding of the patterns and changes in cardiac arrest incidence in Israel.
Let’s look at trends on the number of death. The number of deaths due to cardiac arrest and stroke is also increasing at an accelerated rate between 2020 and 2022. Prior to 2020, the number of deaths in these categories was virtually zero.
Israel is one of the most highly vaccinated countries in the world, with 81.5% of its population having received at least one dose.
However, in 2023, it appears that a majority of the population has become anti-vaxxers. It is unfortunate that despite the decrease in experimental vaccinations by the people, deaths and cases continue to accelerate.
My strongest suspicion at the moment is that the cardiac arrests are caused by subclinical myocarditis due to vaccinations instead of COVID infections.
In a large population-based study conducted last year on Clalit Health Services members in Israel, it was found that there was no increased incidence of either pericarditis or myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection. [SOURCE]
[…]
Via https://seemorerocks.is/israel-348-increase-in-cardiac-arrest-rate-35-increase-in-stroke-rate/
German MP Vows To Dismantle WHO’s Grip On Governments
Zero Hedge
German MP Christine Anderson last week shredded the World Health Organization, calling it a group of “globalitarian misanthropists” who she – and a group of seven other MPs, have vowed to dismantle in order to oppose the WHO supplanting democratically elected governments.
“An unelected body like WHO is controlled and run by multi-billionaires should never be allowed to act in place of a democratically elected government,” she said during the Citizen’s Initiative conference in Brussels.
Anderson says she’ll expose and name any individuals, including government officials and parliamentarians, who support the WHO ‘power grab’ and disrespect democracy.
“It is you [WHO] that is the small fringe minority,” she continued. “You are the ones who do not have the right to dictate to the people what they want and what they don’t want.”
“So take it from me … take it from the millions and millions of people around the world. We will bring you down, and we will not tire until we have done just that. So brace yourselves. We are here, and the fight is on. So let’s have the fight.”
Watch:
US Soldier Defects to North Korea
Credit: BBC
The Blogging Hounds
United States officials have confirmed that one of their soldiers was detained in North Korea this morning. He has also reportedly defected.
CBS News reported that the soldier in question is Private 2nd Class Travis King. Before his detainment, he was being escorted back to the United States from South Korea for disciplinary reasons.
The illegal crossing reportedly occurred at 3.27pm local time (2:37 AM ET) according to the Daily Mirror. King was visiting the Military Demarcation Line (MDL) at Panmunjom with a civilian tour group before leaving their sight.
The MDL marks the border between North and South Korea. The line is surrounded by a demilitarized zone and is one of the most heavily guarded areas in the entire world.
The United States maintains a presence of approximately 28,500 forces along the North Korea-South Korea border.
The United Nations command, which operates the Joint Security Area (JSA) within the demilitarized zone between North and South Korea, released the following statement:
A U.S. National on a JSA orientation tour crossed, without authorization, the Military Demarcation Line into the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). We believe he is currently in DPRK custody and are working with our KPA (North Korean army) counterparts to resolve this incident.
Newsweek revealed that the Korean -language version of the message said that King “had defected to North Korea.” This news has not been confirmed by American authorities at this point.
A witness, who was part of the tour group with King, gives credibility to the report that King was trying to defect. He explained to CBS News that they had just visited one of the buildings at the site before King laughed and disappeared from the group.
[…]
July 17, 2023
UN Approves Large Fukushima Discharge into Pacific Ocean, Prompting China to Ban Japanese Seafood Imports
The Blogging Hounds
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), an international organization within the United Nations system, just approved a large Fukushima discharge into the Pacific Ocean. The pending discharge, which includes over 500 Olympic-sized swimming pools of “treated” radioactive water, will be released from the infamous Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Chinese customs and food safety regulators are warning against the move and are threatening to block seafood imports from Japan.
The Fukushima disaster is not overBack on March 11, 2011, the Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant was struck by 15-meter tsunami from a catastrophic 9.0 earthquake. Immediately, eleven reactors at four nuclear power plants shut down. In the first three days, all three cores largely melted down, releasing radioactive material, especially through days 4-6. The three units were no longer able to maintain proper reactor cooling and water circulation functions, and their electrical switch gear was disabled. For weeks, operators worked to restore heat removal from the reactors.
All four Fukushima Daiichi reactors were decommissioned due to extensive damage from the meltdown. For years, the basic ongoing task was to prevent the release of radioactive materials, particularly in contaminated water that leaked from the three units.
Related: Japan begins secret discharge of RADIOACTIVE WATER from Fukushima nuclear plant into the ocean.
The Fukushima controversy continues over a decade laterOver a decade later, “treated” radioactive water is set to be released directly form the Fukushima plant into the Pacific Ocean. Hong Kong’s Environment and Ecology Department is not on board with the decision. The Department head, Tse Chin-wan, issued a warning for Japan. If Japan discharged the “treated” water into the Pacific Ocean, Tse Chin-wan said China would ban all imported, frozen, refrigerated, and/or dried seafood products, including unprocessed or processed seaweed and sea salt. This impacts China’s supply of scallops, shrimp, tuna, and Japanese rice wine sake, all of which are popular staples in China. China is the largest buyer of Japan’s seafood exports, so the confrontation has enormous implications.
As Japan gets international approval to dump the treated radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean, Hong Kong warned that they will crack down on Japan’s seafood exports and ban products from a “large number” (10) of Japanese prefectures. China’s General Administration of Customs said the ban is to prevent “contaminated food” from hitting Chinese supermarkets. Chinese Customs lambasted IAEA’s report, claiming it “failed to fully reflect expert opinions” and that China will take “all necessary measures” to ensure that Chinese consumers are safe from radioactive waste.
Wang Wenbin, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson addressed the issue in a recent press briefing: “If some people think that the nuclear-contaminated water from Fukushima is safe to drink or swim in, we suggest that Japan save the nuclear-contaminated water for these people to drink or swim in instead of releasing it into the sea and causing widespread concerns internationally.”
Chinese Customs added: “Since the Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011, China’s customs have attached great importance to the issue of radioactive contamination of Japanese food imported to China. It has closely monitored the relevant measures taken by the Japanese government, continued to assess the risk, and responded promptly.”
The IAEA maintains that the treated radioactive water conforms with international safety standards.
[…]
Cobalt and the sacrifice of African children on the green altar
Lucy Wyatt
TCW
COBALT is essential to modern technology. All sorts of electronic devices rely on it, along with other elements such as lithium. Solar panels and electric vehicles (EVs) wouldn’t function without them. While the environmental degradation associated with both lithium and cobalt extraction is well established, the issues around cobalt are even more poignant because of the manner in which it is mined in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
A new book, Cobalt Red: How the blood of the Congo powers our lives, published in January this year, details the human suffering, especially of children, directly involved in the mining. Written by a Nottingham University professor, Siddartha Kara, from first-hand knowledge gained by visiting the Congo, this is a book that should be required reading for every local authority that is implementing the Net Zero agenda. (You can read a review here). Professor Kara is a British Academy Global Professor and Rights Lab Associate Professor of Human Trafficking and Modern Slavery. He advises several UN agencies and numerous governments on anti-slavery policy and the law. We should take him seriously.
What happens in the Congo matters because it is the largest producer of cobalt, accounting for 70 per cent of global production. In 2022 there was a reported output of 130,000 tonnes; the next largest producer, Russia, mined 8,900 tonnes.
At a time when there is growing realisation of the plight of the children of the world, when more people are becoming aware of the Sound of Freedom (the film about child trafficking), it is impossible to reconcile what is happening in the Congo with saving the planet through the use of renewables and other technology. It is not acceptable that children should be sacrificed for us to live in our own little tech-enhanced eco-bubbles.
And yet there are virtue-signalling ‘green’ councils who boast about their use of ‘appropriate’ technology, which includes solar panels and EVs, who seem to have no idea about the inappropriateness of such technology. These fake green councils are in denial about so much. They have no awareness of the history of climate science, of how it all grew out of the oligarchs’ Club of Rome back in the 1970s. Instead they want us to believe that there were decades of concerned scientists warning humanity about climate change and then the elites took over. They are so wilfully ignorant.
The twisting of the history of climate science matters, because that way we fail to spot the deliberate manipulation. If it were too obvious that billionaires are behind the whole scam, we might struggle to believe the science. In the same way, we aren’t supposed to know that the billionaires fund activists such as XR who keep the greenest of ‘green’ councils on track. Forcing councils to focus on the so-called evil of fossil fuels, and carbon reduction, is a way of distracting from the even greater evil of cobalt extraction.
We should all be demanding that our local councils develop their own ecological policies; independent of pressure from international billionaires and their activist lackeys. We want policies that have integrity and genuinely care about the planet and its people. Not the cruel and damaging policies of the fake greens who dance to the tune of the billionaires who do not care about anything except themselves. Personally I would be more than willing to accept a few degrees of warming (and no carbon reduction, as if that makes any difference anyway) if I knew that that meant an end to children being exploited and the flamingos returning to the areas where the lithium comes from. Having less tech would hardly be a disaster for us in the West. Indeed, it might be an important step in healing the damage humans have inflicted on the Earth and its inhabitants.
[…]
Via https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/cobalt-and-the-sacrifice-of-african-children-on-the-green-altar/
North Indian Rule During the First Millennium
Episode 14 Northwest and North India
A History of India
Michael Fisher (2016)
Film Review
Following the fall of the Mauryan Empire, the Gupta Empire (4th-6th century AD) was the only major kingdom in north India. Arising in the fertile Gangetic plain, the Gupta Empire increased agricultural production and trade sufficiently over time to conquer various kingdoms to its south and west.
During this period the population of north India consisted mainly of so-called Indo-Greek Bactrians.* Destablization by the 327 BC invasion by Alexander Great subjected the region to a regular influx of Central Asian tribes. During the 2nd century BC, the Scythians eventually conquered much of modern day Gujarat and Rajistan. During the 1st-3rd century AD, the Kushans,** who dominated the Silk Road, occupied the Indus Valley. In the 3rd-4th century AD, the Persian Sassanian Empire conquered the Indus valley with the rest of the Kushan. At the end of 5th century, the Huna (Huns), driven west by China would assume control of the Indus Valley.
Surviving 200 years, the Gupta dynasty eventually conquered all of north India. Chandragupta II (taking his name from the founder of the Mauryan empire Chandragupta Maurya) was the third Gupta king (375-415 AD). His armies were known with their prowess with the steel longbow and the elephants they rode into battle (thanks to abundant iron, coal and elephants in Magadha, his main power base).
He extended his rule across the entire Gangetic plain and acquired new territory on the Deccan Plateau by intermarrying with a Deccani royal family. Flourishing urban economies caused Sanskrit literature, astronomy and mathematics to flourish during a period that also saw the rise of Ayurvedic medicine and the concept of zero.
Paying Brahman priests to advise them, the Gugta emperors mainly embraced Brahmanism, except for the Indus Valley, where support from the Kushan Empire empowered Mayahana Buddhism.
Weakened by numerous Hun invasions, the Gupta empire collapsed in 550 AD and splintered into numerous smaller warring kingdoms.
Owing to a lack of archeological remains, most evidence from comes from coins and the records of visiting Chinese Buddhists.
*Bactria is the Roman term for an ancient Persian kingdom on the Central Asian steppes.
**SeeThe Role of the Kushan Empire in the First Silk Road
Film can be viewed free with a library card on Kanopy.
https://www.kanopy.com/en/pukeariki/watch/video/366254/366199
July 16, 2023
13 Nations Agree to Abolish Farming to ‘Save the Planet’
EU Times
The global climate cult is getting ready to kick its war on food into overdrive with 13 nations – many of them major cattle and food-producing states led by the United States, Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Spain – signing onto a commitment to place farmers under new restrictions intended to reduce emissions of methane gas.
The Global Methane Hub announced in a May 17 press release that agriculture and environmental ministers and ambassadors from 13 countries, including the United States, have signed a commitment that pledges to reduce methane emissions in agriculture. The U.S. was represented by Biden’s climate czar, John Kerry.
What does this mean and why should you care? We’ll break it down.
According to the press release issued by these nations and posted at Global Methane Hub:
“Last month (in April 2023), the Global Methane Hub collaborated with the Ministries of Agriculture of Chile and Spain to convene the first-ever global ministerial on agricultural practices to reduce methane emissions. The ministerial brought together high-ranking government members to share global perspectives on methane reduction and low-emission food systems. The gathering led to a statement in which the nations committed to support efforts to improve the quality and quantity of, and access to, finance for climate change adaptation and mitigation measures in the agriculture and food sectors and to collaborate on efforts aimed at lowering methane emissions in agriculture and food systems.”
Conference participants included the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Climate & Clean Air Coalition, Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture, the World Bank, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, and the Inter-American Development Bank.
The World Bank, another creation of the post-World War II, U.S.-led liberal rules-based order, has been talking a lot lately, along with the U.N., about a coming famine. The World Bank issued a white paper just last week, on May 22, titled Food Security Update: World Bank Response to Rising Food Insecurity.
The director of the United Nations World Food Program has also been putting out, starting in September of last year, dire warnings about a coming global famine.
So it’s curious to me that, at the very time the globalists are warning about food shortages and famine, their mouthpieces at the World Bank, the U.N., and within the administrations of the U.S. and its allies (notice China and Russia are nowhere to be found in these preposterous anti-food policies), are talking about converting over to a new and unproven form of “sustainable” farming that’s focused more on reducing methane than it is on producing the highest yields of food.
Modern food production is bad, they tell us, because it produces methane which supposedly harms the environment.
“Food systems are responsible for 60% of methane emissions,” said Marcelo Mena, CEO of Global Methane Hub. “We congratulate countries willing to take the lead in food systems methane mitigation and confirm our commitment to support this type of initiative with programs that explore promising methane mitigation technologies and the underpinning research of methane mitigation mechanisms to create new technologies.”
John Kerry is also very excited about taking valuable, productive farmland offline, reducing the size of cattle herds, and turning our food-production systems over to technocrats and globalists offering vague promises of “new technologies.”
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. is busy trying to mitigate methane emissions not just in America but worldwide, stating on its website: “The United States provides key leadership, funding and technical expertise for international methane emission reduction efforts, resulting in more than 1,140 methane mitigation projects through GMI as of 2021.”
In just one example, the Biden administration plans to spend $1.5 million in taxpayer funds on a program aimed at “empowering” female climate change activists in the “patriarchal” society of northern Kenya, documents reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon show.
John Kerry said in a statement, “Mitigating methane is the fastest way to reduce warming in the short term. Food and agriculture can contribute to a low-methane future by improving farmer productivity and resilience. We welcome agriculture ministers participating in the implementation of the Global Methane Pledge.”
The May 17 press release further states that, “The focus of the conference was the deployment of science-based practices, innovation, and technologies in line with sustainable food production…”
The nations signing onto this pledge to transform their farm policies are the United States, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Chile, Czech Republic, Ecuador, Germany, Panama, Peru and Spain.
The government of Spain will organize a second conference in 2024 to monitor and advance implementation efforts related to the statement and encourage more countries to join, according to the May 14 press release.
In order to save the planet from emissions that come from cow farts, they claim it’s necessary to force farmers to change the way they farm, converting their land and livestock to more “innovative” methods and “science-based practices.” These methods will need to be implemented not just on farms but throughout the “food systems.”
They never come out and say what these “innovative” changes are, only that they will be based on “new technologies” and “science-based.”
We can presume from this language that among the practices being considered are replacing a major portion of the beef and dairy cattle, pork and chicken stocks that populations rely on for protein with insect larvae, meal worms, crickets, etc. The U.N., World Economic Forum and other NGOs have been promoting meatless diets and the consumption of insect protein for years, and billionaires have invested in massive insect factories being built in the state of Illinois, in Canada and in the Netherlands, where meal worms, crickets and other bugs will be processed as additives to be inserted into the food supply, often without clear labels that will inform people of exactly what they are eating. Bill Gates is also partnering with other billionaires to invest in the production of lab-grown meat, a process that involves using cancer cells from cows, chickens and pigs to quickly grow artificial meat.
Farmers will be increasingly forced off their land, as is already happening in the Netherlands, which is the world’s second leading net exporter of food after the United States.
All this will add up to a coming famine the likes of which has never been witnessed by the current generation of people on earth. It’s all by design. Globalists like Dennis Meadows, the author of the 1972 Club of Rome-endorsed book The Limits to Growth, informed us of the globalists’ plans to drastically depopulate the earth. His comments in the video below were made I believe in 2017.
“We can have 1 Billion people with freedom, or 9 Billion slaves. We’re at over 7 Billion right now, so we need to bring that down to 1 Billion.
I hope that culling can be peaceful and slow and equal between rich and poor.” -Dennis Meadows (author of Limits to Growth) Club of Rome pic.twitter.com/YEwV2ADF7L
— Global Freedom Movement (@GlobalFreedomM) April 18, 2022
[…]
Via https://www.eutimes.net/2023/06/13-nations-agree-to-abolish-farming-in-order-to-save-the-planet/
RFK Jr: Ethnically Targeted Bioweapons
Robert F Kennedy Jr
American Resurrection
New York Post reporter Jon Levine got it wrong in his article today claiming that I said COVID was “ethnically targeted” to spare Jews.
I have never, ever suggested that the COVID-19 virus was targeted to “spare” Jews. I accurately pointed out — during an off-the-record conversation — that China and other governments are developing ethnically targeted bioweapons and that a 2021 study of the COVID-19 virus shows that COVID-19 appears to disproportionately affect certain races since the furin cleave docking site is most compatible with Blacks and Caucasians and least compatible with ethnic Chinese, Finns, and Ashkenazi Jews.
In that sense, it serves as a kind of proof of concept for ethnically targeted bioweapons. I do not believe and never implied that the ethnic effect was deliberately engineered.
That study is here: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32664879/.
Levine exploited this OFF-THE-RECORD conversation to smear me by association with an outlandish conspiracy theory.
This cynical maneuver is consistent with the mainstream media playbook to discredit me as a crank — and by association, to discredit revelations of genuine corruption and collusion.
Here are three examples:
1. Government / Big Tech collusion to censor dissent on social media;
2. Fauci et al’s suppression of the lab leak hypothesis;
3. The censoring of information questioning COVID vaccine safety and efficacy.
As I describe in my new book, “The Wuhan Cover-Up,” ethnically targeted bioweapons are real, and history makes clear there is no population who should be more concerned about a thing like that than people of Jewish and African decent.
Gavin de Becker, bestselling author of “The Gift of Fear,” just made this insightful comment on the New York Post controversy. It’s worth sharing:
“Targeted propaganda attacks work because they grab us emotionally. I am Jewish too, bar mitzvahed, grandfather escaped from Poland, etc. So the whole topic is radioactive — and from that point of view, the NY Post article is masterful: it grabs us, gets us emotionally invested, and sets people searching for adjacent material by bad people to link to the topic RFK Jr raised.
“It gets our attention and it gets us to associate crazy ideas with RFK Jr., and most of all, it gives us a person to focus all our anger and revulsion and fear on.
“What the article does *not* do is bring any attention to the fact that the most powerful governments in history are spending billions of dollars on exactly this type of biological weapon.
“In fact, the article accomplishes exactly the opposite. It distracts from ethnically targeted biological weapons and focuses attention on the man RFK Jr. instead.”
Finally, let’s not miss the bigger context here, which is the need to shift our national and global priorities away from bioweapons, and weapons of all kinds, to focus on peace, freedom, and prosperity. That’s what I just told Michael Shellenberger on the phone: “My point was that what they’re doing is horrendous. Instead of being at war, we should be signing treaties for peace and for controlling bioweapons.” Shellenberger’s post today is worth reading.
And, please watch my conversation with Rabbi Shmuley here.
[…]
Via https://robertfkennedyjr.substack.com/p/new-york-post-jon-levine-wrong
The Most Revolutionary Act
- Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's profile
- 11 followers
