Alon Shalev's Blog, page 63

August 18, 2011

Political Anagrams by Roger Ingalls

Let's put the serious blogging aside and make some smiles. Today I want to poke fun at conservative politicians by anagramming their names.


What is an anagram? It is a rearrangement of the letters of one word or phrase to form another word or phrase. A very simple example is rearranging the letters of "Evil" to get "Vile".


Warning, these anagrams may not be politically correct and some may be a little crude!



Michele Bachmann (Rep. from Minnesota and Presidential Candidate)


Anagram: "Michele Bachmann" becomes "A Calm Bi-Henchmen". Ironic since she and her husband believe a gay can be prayed straight.


Hench-men: n., a person who supports a political figure chiefly out of selfish interests.


Bi: slang n., a bisexual person.


George W. Bush (43rd President of the United States)


Anagram: "George W. Bush" becomes "Whose Bugger". The story goes something like this; Little George got caught stealing funds from the church's collection plate so the preacher held him up by the collar and asked the congregation, "whose bugger?" George's mother, Barbara Bush, was too embarrassed to claim her own son.


Bug-ger: slang n., a contemptible or disreputable person.


Bug-ger: vulgar slang n., a sodomite.


Ronald Reagan (40th President of the United States)


Anagram 1: "Ronald Reagan" becomes "Adrenal Groan". An adrenal groan is something Nancy Reagan never experienced while married to President Reagan.


Anagram 2: "Ronald Reagan" becomes "A Granola Nerd". The President probably didn't eat granola but his son, Ron Reagan, may have while practicing ballet.


Anagram 3: "Ronald Reagan" becomes "Anal Anger Rod". An anal anger rod is something President Reagan gave to Mikhail Gorbachev during the USA-USSR Cold War summit meetings. I can see Ronny saying, "take this you communist bastard".



James "Rick" Perry (Texas Governor and Presidential Candidate)


Anagram: "James Rick Perry" becomes "Scary Prime Jerk". Rick Perry ignores the separation of church and state, and brings religious prejudice to politics. It is a scary thought that this prime jerk could become president.


Prime: adj., first in degree or rank; chief.


John Boehner (Rep. from Ohio)


Anagram 1: "Rep. John Boehner" becomes "John Horn Beeper".


Anagram 2: "Rep. John Boehner" becomes "Be Her Prone John". What a pimp says to his hooker's client, "lie down and be her prone john".


Prone: adj., lying downward.


John: n., a prostitute's client.


Scott Walker (Wisconsin Governor)


Anagram: "Scott Walker" becomes "We Lost Track". Before flushing him to Hell, Saint Peter asked Gov Walker, "why did you suck up to Big Biz instead of protecting the people of Wisconsin?" A slobbering Walker cried, "we lost track of our constitutional duty."


Willard "Mitt" Romney (Former Governor and Presidential Candidate)


Anagram: "Willard Romney" becomes "Really Din Worm". Mitt is a loud mouth squirmy worm.


Din: a jumble of loud, usually discordant sounds.


Eric Cantor (Rep. from Virginia)


Anagram 1: "Eric Cantor" becomes "Erratic Con". Needs no explanation.


Anagram 2: "Eric Cantor" becomes "Cancer Trio". Michele Bachmann, John Boehner and Eric Cantor are the Cancer Trio of American Politics.



Sarah Palin (Former Governor and Former Vice Presidential Candidate)


Anagram 1: "Sarah Palin" becomes "Las Piranha". An Alaskan fish taco.


Anagram 2: "Sarah Palin" becomes "A Plain Rash". A plain rash is what many Americans get when Sarah speaks.


Anagram 3: "Sarah Palin" becomes "Ah Anal Rips". What Todd Palin says after passing gas from Sarah's moose and bean stew, "ah….anal rips."


Tea Party Nation


Anagram: "Tea Party Nation" becomes "A Potty Inane Rat". 


Potty: adj., having a muddled confused mind, silly, foolish, illogical, crazy or addlebrained.


Inane: adj., lacks sense or substance.


The "Tea Party Nation" anagram is descriptively on target and a perfect closing to this post. They truly are a senseless addlebrained movement.


——————————————


Roger Ingalls is well travelled and has seen the good and bad of many foreign governments. He hopes his blogging will encourage readers to think more deeply about the American political system and its impact on US citizens and the international community.



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 18, 2011 05:00

August 17, 2011

Who's Connected?

The Pew Research Center for the People & the Press "is an independent, non-partisan public opinion research organization that studies attitudes toward politics, the press and public policy issues. In this role it serves as a valuable information resource for political leaders, journalists, scholars and citizens."


They recently issued three reports on which communication tools we are using.  Here is a very brief overview.


Smartphone Adoption and Usage



35% of all US adults have a smartphone.
The biggest users — those with income of $75K or more, college degree, under age 45, African-American or Latino.
Some 87% of smartphone owners access the internet or email on their handheld; 25% of smartphone owners say that they mostly go online using their phone, rather than with a computer.

It's fast and smells good!


E-reader & Tablet Ownership



E-reader ownership has doubled in last six months, to 12% of US adults.
Tablet ownership, now at 8%, appears to be leveling off; 17% of those with $75K+ income own one, and 13% of college grads.
Confirming the overall trend toward adoption of mobile devices, laptop computers are for the first time as popular as desktop computers among U.S. adults.

Ebooks - the future is now.


Social Networking Sites and Our Lives



47% of US adults use at least one social network site (SNS), close to double the number in 2008.
Half these users are now over the age of 35.
92% are using Facebook, 18% LinkedIn, 13% Twitter.

However, here is what really excited me:


"At that time, 10% of Americans reported that they had attended a political rally, 23% reported that they had tried to convince someone to vote for a specific candidate, and 66% reported that they had or intended to vote. Internet users in general were over twice as likely to attend a political meeting, 78% more likely to try and influence someone's vote, and 53% more likely to have voted or intended to vote.  Compared with other internet users, and users of other SNS platforms, a Facebook user who uses the site multiple times per day was an additional two and half times more likely to attend a political rally or meeting, 57% more likely to persuade someone on their vote, and an additional 43% more likely to have said they would vote."


The premise of my novel, The Accidental Activist, written several years prior to this report, was the vision that the Internet and its various platforms would become a catalyst for more political and social advocacy.


It is still the beginning, but a very exciting beginning.


——————————————————————————————————


Alon Shalev is the author of The Accidental Activist (now available on Kindle) and A Gardener's Tale. He is the Executive Director of the San Francisco Hillel Foundation, a non-profit that provides spiritual and social justice opportunities to Jewish students in the Bay Area. More on Alon Shalev at http://www.alonshalev.com/and on Twitter (#alonshalevsf).



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 17, 2011 07:00

August 16, 2011

The American Left Part 2 – So What's Important and What To Do?

A couple of weeks ago, I posted a critique of the American Left. I think these criticisms are valid and I stand by them completely. However, my own negativity has sunk into my brain and made me realize that I have only said half of what needs to be said – and maybe the less important half.


Here's the other half…. or at least a decent start.


I was not specific about what I meant by "teammates" and our failure to accept them – and the consequences. I also complained that we have no coach, and yet I offered hardly a word of direction or encouragement myself. So let me say a little more about why we need to work together, and then I'll do my best to say how we might start to do it.


Right now, we have many groups striving to be treated like human beings, or like human beings of equal stature to the almost mythical "great white male". Of course this really refers to a very special class of white male – a class to which I do not belong.


Some of these groups represent different races, religions, or even ages, body-types, or sexual preference/status/identity. And let's not forget the other class that is being thrown under the bus these days – workers. Some workers are members of unions, others are not. All are being downgraded in our economy. The worth of the American worker is at its lowest point in decades. Teachers and police officers (among others) are being "asked" (forced) to make sacrifices in order to avoid raising taxes on the rich by 3% or taxing corporations at all.


Each of these groups fights for recognition as "real" Americans and "real" human beings – and rightly so. But their fragmented, uncoordinated attacks on the status quo have made moderate gains on a time-scale measured in decades. This is because of a simple and obvious fact: when group A fights for group A, and group B fights for group B, each group is small and almost powerless. They have even been played against each other at times.



Aren't all of these groups really fighting for the same thing? Don't we ALL want to be treated like human beings and not animals nor robots? Don't we all want fairness? Don't we all want to live in peace, without fear of prejudice? Don't we all want not to be stepped on by the police, nor by corporations, nor by our government? Don't we all have a reasonable expectation that we should be able to provide food and shelter for our families? Don't we all want the security that comes from our own hard work? Don't we all want some assurance that our children and our grandchildren will live in a decent world with drinkable water and breathable air?



Then let's work together!


Let's get started. Today, I want every one of you to go out of your way to shake hands with someone different from you, but who might be a potential teammate in the battle against the status quo. Smile. Ask a question about his or her job, family, opinion on catsup vs. mustard, the weather, whatever! These people are your teammates. None of them is perfect and none of them is exactly like you, nor do they have exactly the same goals or abilities. Great! We NEED lots of different kinds of people.


Next, we need to break free from the superficial games that our elections have become. We can no longer vote for or against someone because of the way he or she looks, because he or she smoked a joint a couple of times, nor even because he or she cheated on his or her spouse. These things are irrelevant. And we can't be scared off by the anti-tax boo-birds. Nobody is talking about raising taxes on the middle class… NOBODY! We cannot be scared back into the status quo! We need to send a shockwave through our election system… We are here, and we won't be screwed anymore!


I'm not nearly qualified to serve as this team's coach. But maybe this team will have thousands of assistant coaches, and I'll volunteer for one of those jobs. We all just need to keep it in our minds that, together, we can improve the situation of each and every one of the aforementioned groups – and each group will do BETTER FOR ITSELF as part of a larger team than it ever would on its own.


The mixed bucket of crises that we have all faced and are facing has bred a fair amount of fighting and blaming within our team. The opponent is not within. Let's focus our efforts. Together, with some reasonable changes, we can have comfortable, secure lives in a sustainable world. It's easy to see how a unifying set of principles could incorporate the goals of groups concerned with the issues of race and gender and such. It might prove more difficult to create a unified philosophy and calls-for-action which combine these types of issues with the imperative of managing our planet and its resources sustainably, but the potential is there and it must be done.


As it now stands, the resources of our country and of the world are being stolen from all of us and used up at a phenomenal rate in order to enrich those who are already very, very wealthy. The fight for the rights of minorities, or women, or whoever will be meaningless if most of us are living (and dying) in extreme poverty in the middle of a colossal toxic waste dump.


The process of taking our resources (unless we can slow it down) will further oppress those who are already oppressed. We've seen, recently, how crises are used to justify increased oppression of the lower and middle classes. We must re-prioritize PEOPLE OVER PROFITS. We must reject the lie that profits benefit everyone. It may have once been true in this country, but no longer.


If we can advance this simple set of principles, we will all benefit.



That black man, that white woman, that Chicano, or that Vietnamese woman standing behind you at the grocery store is probably your teammate. That "hippie," that nerdy-looking scientist, or that artist sitting near you on the train might have some ideas you would be interested in – or might be interested in some of yours. Meet these people. Start talking. Start a movement.


-Tom Rossi


___________________________________________________________________________


Tom Rossi is a commentator on politics and social issues. He is a Ph.D. student in International Sustainable Development, concentrating in natural resource and economic policy. Tom greatly enjoys a hearty debate, especially over a hearty pint of Guinness.


Tom also posts on thrustblog.blogspot.com


___________________________________________________________________________



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 16, 2011 06:47

August 15, 2011

The New MidListers

Yesterday I highlighted John Locke as a successful ebook author who has sold more than 1 million ebooks. Along with Amanda Hocking and J.R.Konrath, they are the Grishams and Pattersons of the new book reality. Thinking gof this made me wonder whether there is an emerging 'midlist' in the ebook jungle. Gotta love Google – I came across "The New Midlist: Self-published E-book Authors Who Earn a Living" by Robin Sullivan.


Amanda Hocking - leading the charge.


Ms. Sullivan suggests that this is in fact the case and that these authors are able to generate income because of the high royalties. The traditional book model (the terms offered by the big six publishers) offers 25% royalty on net sales of ebooks. But Amazon.com offers 35% for books up to $2.99 and a whooping 70% for books that sell between $2.99 and $9.99.


The trick is to leverage the Internet to generate high volume sales that are attracted because of the price is allowing more self-published and small press e-book authors to receive five and six figure yearly incomes. Many of these authors are able to leave their day jobs and make a living by doing what they love most–writing.


Michale Sullivan - leading the mid-listers


Ms. Sullivan runs a small press, Ridan Publishing. Her husband, Michael J. Sullivan, has six books published. From January to September 2010, his income averaged just over $1,500 a month or around $10,700 in total (Amazon US Kindle sales only). Once he hit the tipping point  he earned more than $102,000 in just five months. For details on his monthly income see the following chart:


Michael J Sullivan Amazon Sales


A quick glance at Writer's Café (a section of the Kindle Boards forums), shows that Michael's sales increase is not an isolated phenomena.  The following graph shines light on the number of authors who sold at least 800 books a month (Data provided on Kindle Board).


Amazon author sales over 800


Ms. Sullivan estimated the income of several of these authors according to the sales and book price data that the authors were posting on the Kindle Boards for one month.



Michael J. Sullivan — $16,648
Ellen Fisher — $3,915
Siebel Hodge — $15,425
N. Gemini Sasson – $4,222
David McAfee — $6,085
David Dalglish — $12,132
Victorine Lieskie — $7,281
M. H. Sergent — $4,211
Nathan Lowell — $9,296

What I found interesting is that only Victorine Lieskie, from among those listed above, ever had a book that made the Amazon Top 100 Bestseller List. The other authors are selling at least 800 books a month.


It is possible to live the author's life.


——————————————————————————————————


Alon Shalev is the author of The Accidental Activist (now available on Kindle) and A Gardener's Tale. He is the Executive Director of the San Francisco Hillel Foundation, a non-profit that provides spiritual and social justice opportunities to Jewish students in the Bay Area. More on Alon Shalev at http://www.alonshalev.com/and on Twitter (#alonshalevsf).



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 15, 2011 07:00

August 14, 2011

Author Sells One Million Ebooks

On Monday, June 20th, 2011, Amazon.com have recently announced that crime novelist John Locke has become the first independent author to sell more than one million ebooks through Kindle's Direct Publishing program,


1 million ebooks sold - so much for needing an agent and publisher?


Locke points  to his $0.99 pricing model as a major influence and has self-published nine novels through the Kindle Store, including New York Times bestselling ebook Saving Rachel, as well as his first non-fiction title, How I Sold 1 Million eBooks in 5 Months. He has six novels in the Amazon Top 100 and has coveted the No. 1 spot.


A line of books seems essential to make serious money in this climate


Locke has never been signed by a traditional agent or publisher. He joins seven other authors, including Stieg Larsson and Nora Roberts, in the "Kindle Million Club." Locke sells his books for $1 and makes 35 cents per book. That is hard for me to fathom – selling the books I have sweated and toiled on for at least a year, but I can't question that it works.


Along with Amanda Hocking and J. A Konrath, Locke is creating a new reality in the ever-evolving book world. They all create a system, work hard to achieve their goals, and are now reaping the benefits. The rest of us would be foolish to ignore them.


Good luck to them.


——————————————————————————————————


Alon Shalev is the author of The Accidental Activist (now available on Kindle) and A Gardener's Tale. He is the Executive Director of the San Francisco Hillel Foundation, a non-profit that provides spiritual and social justice opportunities to Jewish students in the Bay Area. More on Alon Shalev at http://www.alonshalev.com/and on Twitter (#alonshalevsf).


 


 



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 14, 2011 07:00

August 13, 2011

Anne Braden Pt. 3

I hadn't really planned this, but a few people mentioned that they had trouble understanding the lyrics of the Flobots which I wrote in two previous posts. Here is a You Tube file with the lyrics. I love how the Flobots added quotes from Ms. Braden herself. The lyrics are below if you wish to peruse at your own pace.



Anna Braden – Fight With Tools – The Flobots


from the color of the faces in sunday's songs

to the hatred they raised all the youngsters on

once upon a time in this country long ago

she knew there was something wrong

because the song said yellow, red, black, and white

everyone precious in the path of christ

but what about the daughter of the woman cleaning their house

wasnt she a child they were singing about

and if Jesus loves us black or white skin

why didn't her white mother invite them in?

when did it become a room for no blacks to step in?

how did she already know not to ask the question

left lasting impressions

adolescence's comforts gone

she never thought things would ever change

but she always knew there was something wrong


she always knew there was something wrong


years later she found herself mississippi-bound

to help stop the legalized lynching

of mr. willie mcgee

but they couldnt stop it

so they thought that theyd talk to the governor

about what happened

and say were tired of being used

as an excuse to kill black men

but the cops wouldnt let em past and

these women they struck em as uppity

so they hauled em all off to jail

and they called it protective custody

then from her cell she heard her jailers

grumbling about outsiders

and when she called him out

and said she was from the south they shouted

why is a nice southern lady

making trouble for the governor?

she said, i guess Im not your type of lady

and i guess Im not your type of southerner.

but before you call me traitor

well its plainest just to say

i was a child in mississippi

but Im ashamed of it today


imagine the world that youre standing within

all of your neighbors and family and friends

how would you cope

facing the fact

the flesh on your hand

was tainted with sin

she faced it every day

people she saw on a regular basis

people she loved in several cases

people she knew were incredibly racist

it was painful

but she never stopped loving them

never stopped calling their name

and she never stopped being a southern woman

and she never stopped calling for change

and she saw that her struggle

was in the tradition

of ancestors never aware of her

it continues today

the soul of a southerner

born of the other america


Album- Fight With Tools – 2007


——————————————————————————————————


Alon Shalev is the author of The Accidental Activist (now available on Kindle) and A Gardener's Tale. He is the Executive Director of the San Francisco Hillel Foundation, a non-profit that provides spiritual and social justice opportunities to Jewish students in the Bay Area. More on Alon Shalev at http://www.alonshalev.com/and on Twitter (#alonshalevsf).



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 13, 2011 07:00

August 12, 2011

Sushi, Nargila and Social Justice in Israel

While this title looks more akin to a program that we offer at the San Francisco Hillel Jewish Student Center, it is actually an association that has been going around the Internet with regard to the Tent Revolution in Israel. 


The phrase came from controversial politician Avigdor Lieberman, who claimed the economy can't be that bad because he couldn't find a free table in a Tel Aviv restaurant. Carlo Strenger sums up the movement in an article in the Jerusalem Post.


 


Tel Aviv - camping with purpose


Unlike the uprisings in Israel's neighbors, this is not about toppling an autocratic political system. Whatever your view of Israel and its politics (and there is a lot to criticize), Israel is a democracy. In fact, one of the biggest problems in the Israeli democracy system is the low threshold that allows many people/parties to get a a few seats in the Knesset (Parliament) and hold the bigger parties to political ransom.


Ironically, the tent cities that are appearing all over Israel reflect this problem. There is no central leadership, no specific demands. This is a plethora of single-causes and grievances expressing their frustration. This adds an awareness of social injustices inherent in Israeli society, but it is difficult to bring them together in one thread.


The sushi analogy reveals something that we should take note of here in the US. Both countries have a growing gap between the working class and the wealthy, but the new recession has hit the middle class hard.


Strenger explains the growing frustration of the middle class and the young professionals in his excellent article by highlighting on the exploitation of graduating psychologists who will work for many years just to bring themselves to a financial position where they can save for their future.


Tent City in Tel Aviv


While I don't want to belittle their individual grievances, I can't help feeling that the lack of strategic focus and leadership means that the Israeli tent movement will prove unsustainable. While there are many differences between Israel and the US economy and class structure, a middle class that cannot flourish means an economy that only allows for the rich to get richer at everyone else's expense.


In this Israel and the US are very similar. Perhaps it is time to begin erecting tent cities over here.


——————————————————————————————————


Alon Shalev is the author of The Accidental Activist (now available on Kindle) and A Gardener's Tale. He is the Executive Director of the San Francisco Hillel Foundation, a non-profit that provides spiritual and social justice opportunities to Jewish students in the Bay Area. More on Alon Shalev at http://www.alonshalev.com/and on Twitter (#alonshalevsf).




 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 12, 2011 04:00

August 11, 2011

Bipartisan Rant: Thank You, I'm Not Alone (by Roger Ingalls)

Often, my head and heart burn with frustration when I can't find the words or intensity to express myself. Like many people, I have complex thoughts, little spare time and no soapbox to pair vocal-passion with words.


Every once in awhile someone comes along and says exactly what I want to scream to the world. This gift was given to me on Tuesday. My eyes teared-up as I said to myself, "thank you…I'm not alone".


In a rare bipartisan rant, Dylan Ratigan let all sides have it during his MSNBC show.


I implore you – the readers of this post – to watch this four minute video. It will make you smarter and hopefully move you.



This is the shortest post I've written, I can't add anything to what Dylan Ratigan said. Every point he made was a homerun.


I take solace knowing others see the world as I do and, oddly, it's comforting to see the growing frustration. Frustration will eventually lead to action.


A change is gonna come!


——————————————————————————-


Roger Ingalls is well travelled and has seen the good and bad of many foreign governments. He hopes his blogging will encourage readers to think more deeply about the American political system and its impact on US citizens and the international community.



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 11, 2011 05:00

August 10, 2011

Doing Business With Autocracies

In a recent blog post, my colleague, Tom Rossi, said that corporations are in existence solely to make money, not to better our society. I was thinking of this when I came across an article in the New York Times about American companies enthusiastically doing business with China, and in particular, collaborating on projects that provide effective tools to quash protests and free speech.


Installing surveillance cameras


Here are a few examples:


- Cisco Systems (among others) are creating the biggest police surveillance system in the world through a government contract in the city of Chongqing.


- Microsoft's search engine, Bing, still censors searches in China. Earlier this month, it agreed to provide search results in English for Baidu, China's leading — and heavily censored — engine. This is taking place 18 months after Google, to avoid aiding the government with such censorship, pulled its search engine out of China.


The Consequences:


1) Shi Tao sits in prison for a 10 year sentence after Yahoo provided copies of his emails to the government.


2) In May of this year, Cisco was sued by Chinese practitioners of Falun Gong who accused the multinational of abetting  the Chinese government through the creation and maintainable of the so-called Golden Shield system. This surveillance system targets and then follows dissidents communicating online, which has led to the detaining and torturing of Falun Gong practitioners.



Cisco took issue with the accusation. The company claims that it does not design it's programs or equipment to aid the government censor content, intercept communications or track users. It sells the Chinese government standard-issue general network equipment.


In fairness, some of the multinational corporations did begin to take steps after Yahoo's debacle regarding its role in Shi Tao's arrest and conviction.  Yahoo, Microsoft and Google joined in the Global Network Initiative which tries to create guidelines to protect "the freedom of expression rights of their users when confronted with government demands, laws and regulations to suppress freedom of expression."


But these commitments are voluntary. Should the government take a role in clearly setting boundaries? It happened following the 1989 Tienanmen Square massacre when companies were barred from selling such technology. Quite rightly, it has been pointed out that effective anti-spam and hacking technology could be adapted to aid repressive regimes.


One executive from Hewlett-Packard, who are bidding for a stake in the Chongqing surveillance project told The Wall Street Journal: "It's not my job to really understand what they're going to use it for."



Really? Is there no responsibility beyond the profit line? Coming from a multinational, probably not. As stated at the beginning of this article, this is their sole reason to exist.


Which is why, if the United States truly sees itself as the leader of world freedom, it needs to create not guidelines or principles, but laws preventing American technology helping totalitarian regimes. However, we may discover that while our government cannot even get these companies to pay their taxes, they might have little power over such huge economic conglomerates and their powerful lobbyist allies.


And that is even scarier.


——————————————————————————————————


Alon Shalev is the author of The Accidental Activist (now available on Kindle) and A Gardener's Tale. He is the Executive Director of the San Francisco Hillel Foundation, a non-profit that provides spiritual and social justice opportunities to Jewish students in the Bay Area. More on Alon Shalev at http://www.alonshalev.com/and on Twitter (#alonshalevsf).




 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 10, 2011 07:00

August 9, 2011

The Wonderful, Magical Adventures of PG&E

Hello boys and girls! Today, I'm going to tell you a story about a most wonderful company, PG&E. It sounds a little like "piggy" doesn't it? Hee hee hee! Ah, PG&E. Pacific Gas & Electric. What a great example of capitalism at work. And what an impressive decade they've had so far – and it's only the second year!



Let's travel back… to a time when life was simpler – 2010, when dinosaurs roamed the land. The "mid-term" elections were coming up, and PG&E had a great idea: "Why don't we make it illegal for the government to 'compete' with us, so that we can make EVEN MORE MONEY?!" And so, the little magic elves at PG&E went to work to craft a bill that would screw the people of California, all the while knowing that their magical PR department would craft messages to make it seem as if they were doing what's right, American, and patriotic!They came up with a magical plan called Proposition 16 – an innocuous, innocent name, no? Prop 16 would have made it much, much more difficult for those evil citizens cooperatives (booo!) to purchase power for their communities at lower prices – interfering with PG&E's loving, all-American, freshly-baked and aromatic profit potential.



PG&E valiantly spent $46 million of their customers' money in their forthright attempt to set things right. But, alas, they failed. The people of California just could not be made to see that paying higher rates for power would make PG&E's profits even higher, and wouldn't that be good for everyone? Poor deluded souls.


But wait! All was not lost! PG&E had other plans, already in progress, to make EVEN MORE MONEY. One involved a little risk, but fortunately, it wasn't risk to the company's profits! The risk was to the lives and property of PG&E's customers instead! Hooray for PG&E!



You see, boys and girls, it turns out that PG&E has been "saving" (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) money for years by lying to those mean-old government regulators (booooo!) about their high-pressure gas pipelines. The lies were stacked upon other lies that they had already told – lies about materials, thicknesses, welds, joints (no boys and girls, not the fun kind!) and pressures. PG&E figured that nothing would ever go wrong because those mean-old regulators were just too careful anyway. The pipes didn't need to be that safe, did they?



So, when something finally went wrong, PG&E lost a small handful of paying customers – nothing to cry about for sure. And while they also had to pay some "damages" to people who missed their mommies and daddies, none of the decision-makers that had caused this mess would ever have to go to jail.


You see, boys and girls, that's how our system of corporate insulation works. If a person kills someone, he'll go to jail. If a corporation kills someone, it's just "collateral damage" to the profit-making process – just like when we go to "liberate" some people in a far away land by killing them! Isn't this a nice story?



But wait! It's not over yet! PG&E has even more fun ways to make EVEN MORE MONEY! Lately, they've been secretly (and not so secretly) swapping the meters that tell the meter-reader how much electricity people use with automatic machines! These "smart meters" emit radiation in the form of a microwave radio signal (PG&E says it's really safe – and why wouldn't anyone trust them?) so that they can fire all their meter-readers. Yaaaayyy!So now, as some smart people called "economists" say, these meter-readers are free! Free to go and find another job. Oh, how nice for them!So you see, boys and girls, in America we love to lock up people who rob a liquor store or smoke something funny. But in the meantime, we let the real criminals do whatever they want to do! And get disgustingly, filthy rich in the process! Soooooo, what's the lesson here? Are you going to go out and rob a liquor store? Are you going to go out and get a job (as a meter-reader maybe?) and work like a dog until you get replaced by a machine and HAVE to rob a liquor store to stay alive and feed your family? Of course not. You're all going to grow up to steal and poison and kill on a massive scale, aren't you? All you have to do is believe and your dreams will all come true!



The End.


By Magical Friendly Troll Tom Rossi


___________________________________________________________________________


Tom Rossi is a commentator on politics and social issues. He is a Ph.D. student in International Sustainable Development, concentrating in natural resource and economic policy. Tom greatly enjoys a hearty debate, especially over a hearty pint of Guinness.


Tom also posts on thrustblog.blogspot.com


___________________________________________________________________________



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 09, 2011 06:23