Judyth Vary Baker's Blog, page 2

THE SHOW WAS COAST TO COAST, AND LISTENERS FINA...

THE SHOW WAS COAST TO COAST, AND LISTENERS 

FINALLY HEARD SOME TRUTH ABOUT THE REAL LEE 

HARVEY OSWALD AND THE REAL DAVID W. FERRIE.  

 DAVID W. FERRIE -- SKILLED PILOT, LINGUIST, CANCER RESEARCH ASSOCIATE AND PATRIOT--HE PRETENDED TO HATE JFK AND GATHERED INFORMATION ABOUT THE  IMPENDING ASSASSINATION.

BOTH BOOKS, PUBLISHED BY TRINE DAY,  ARE FILLED WITH HUNDREDS OF PHOTOS AND DOCUMENTS REVEALING THE PLAYERS, MOVERS AND SHAKERS IN THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION.
LEE OSWALD -PROUD MARINE AT AGE 17-PATRIOT TO THE END!


ORDER AN AUTOGRAPHED COPY OF ME and LEE: HOW I CAME TO KNOW, LOVE AND LOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD by clicking here.  You can also order unsigned books from TRINE DAY BOOKS, BARNES and NOBLE, OR AMAZON.COM! THIS IS THE BOOK THAT HAS OPENED THE EYES OF THOUSANDS TO THE TRUTH ABOUT THE FALSELY ACCUSED ASSASSIN. LEE WAS EXACTLY WHO HE SAID HE WAS --A PATSY-- AND I MEMORIZED HIS WORDS, SAVED DOCUMENTS, FOUND WITNESSES TO PROVE IT, BECAUSE I LOVED HIM, AND KNOW WHAT HE SACRIFICED, TRYING TO SAVE KENNEDY. 
"PLEASE TELL MY LITTLE GIRLS I WAS A GOOD GUY," LEE BEGGED OF ME. I HAVE KEPT MY PROMISE. 
YOU CAN OBTAIN AN AUTOGRAPHED, HARDCOVER, FIRST PRINTING EDITION OF ME and LEE BY ORDERING THROUGH PAYPAL AT THIS WEBSITE! (see Paypal button)
A CALL FOR VINDICATION!JOIN ME IN DEMANDING THAT A WORLD COURT BE CONVENED TO EXONERATE LEE HARVEY OSWALD AND TO FOCUS ON THE US GOVERNMENT COVER-UP OF THE TRUTH, INCLUDING VICE PRESIDENT LYNDON B. JOHNSON'S INVOLVEMENT !
WANT TO LEARN MORE? VISIT http://judythbaker.blogspot.com/  !!!!!!

FROM COAST TO COAST--THE TRUTH ABOUT LEE HARVEY OSWALD AND DAVID FERRIE!

DAVID W. FERRIE -- SKILLED PILOT, LINGUIST, CANCER RESEARCH ASSOCIATE AND PATRIOT--HE PRETENDED TO HATE JFK AND GATHERED INFORMATION ABOUT THE  IMPENDING ASSASSINATION.THE SHOW WAS COAST TO COAST, AND LISTENERS FINALLY HEARD SOME TRUTH ABOUT THE REAL LEE HARVEY OSWALD AND THE REAL DAVID W. FERRIE.  BOTH BOOKS, PUBLISHED BY TRINE DAY,  ARE FILLED WITH HUNDREDS OF PHOTOS AND DOCUMENTS REVEALING THE PLAYERS, MOVERS AND SHAKERS IN THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION.
LEE OSWALD -PROUD MARINE AT AGE 17-PATRIOT TO THE END!

ORDER ME & LEE: HOW I CAME TO KNOW, LOVE AND LOSE LEE HARVEY OSWALD FROM TRINE DAY BOOKS, BARNES & NOBLE, OR AMAZON.COM! THIS IS THE BOOK THAT HAS OPENED THE EYES OF THOUSANDS TO THE TRUTH ABOUT THE FALSELY ACCUSED ASSASSIN. LEE WAS EXACTLY WHO HE SAID HE WAS --A PATSY-- AND I MEMORIZED HIS WORDS, SAVED DOCUMENTS, FOUND WITNESSES TO PROVE IT, BECAUSE I LOVED HIM, AND KNOW WHAT HE SACRIFICED, TRYING TO SAVE KENNEDY. 
"PLEASE TELL MY LITTLE GIRLS I WAS A GOOD GUY," LEE BEGGED OF ME. I HAVE KEPT MY PROMISE. 
YOU CAN OBTAIN AN AUTOGRAPHED, HARDCOVER, FIRST PRINTING EDITION OF ME & LEE BY ORDERING THROUGH PAYPAL AT THIS WEBSITE! (see Paypal button)
A CALL FOR VINDICATION!JOIN ME IN DEMANDING THAT A WORLD COURT BE CONVENED TO EXONERATE LEE HARVEY OSWALD AND TO FOCUS ON THE US GOVERNMENT'S COVER-UP OF THE TRUTH, INCLUDING VICE PRESIDENT LYNDON B. JOHNSON'S INVOLVEMENT !
INTERESTED IN READING MORE ABOUT LEE OSWALD AS NOT GUILTY? VISIT THIS LINK: http://oswald-not-guilty.blogspot.com/  AND LEARN MUCH MORE!

==THE JFK ASSASSINATION CONFERENCE==HONORING JOHN F. KENN...

==THE JFK ASSASSINATION CONFERENCE==HONORING JOHN F. KENNEDY Seeking the Exoneration of Lee Harvey OswaldSeeking the Truth About the Kennedy Assassination
NOV. 22-23-24! FREE ADMISSION!click on this link to register:
                     THE JFK CONFERENCE                          
15 Minutes from Dealey Plaza                   Amazing Speakers!
Jim Marrs....Dr. Cyril Wecht....Roger Stone....Robert Groden Jerome Corsi....Phillip Nelson....John Barbour....Doug HorneDr. James Fetzer....Edward T. Haslam....Vincent PalamaraCasey Quinlan....Linda Minor....Jesse Ventura....John B. WellsJudyth Vary Baker....Gary Severson....Richard BartholomewTosh Plumlee.... St. John Hunt ....Kris Millegan .... 
Gary Fannin .... George Butler....Gary King....Larry Rivera....Richard Charnin.... Scott Kaiser.... 
SITES
SUNDAY, NOV. 23: due to popular demand, venue was moved to the Sheraton at Arlington-Dallas! Conference had 27 speakers, over 160 total attendees,  and was a huge success! Many thanks to all who donated, and a special thanks to Lorien Fenton, Trine Day Books, and John B. Wells!

THEJFKASSASSINATION CONFERENCESat. Nov. 22Sun. Nov. 23Mon...

THE
JFK
ASSASSINATION CONFERENCE
Sat. Nov. 22
Sun. Nov. 23
Mon. Nov. 24

Dallas/Arlington TX


Honoring President John F. Kennedy
and Seeking Justice for Kennedy and the Falsely Accused
Assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald

THE DEBATE IS OVER.  Lee Harvey Oswald did not shoot John F. Kennedy.  Come to the conference, learn the full truth, and hear the researchers and witnesses who stand firmly on the side of justice for Kennedy and Oswald.  Yes, it matters!
Unlike previous conferences, admission is free -- but the quality of the speakers is superb!  
   Hear Roger Stone, Robert Groden, John Barbour, Tosh Plumlee, Vince Palamara, Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, Richard Bartholomew, Judyth Vary Baker, and some famous names and a new witness that we'll soon be announcing, as the list grows!

NOV. 22: 8:00 AM -10:00 PM  (lunch and dinner breaks)
Bob Duncan Ballroom, 2800 S. Center St., Arlington, TX (on Dallas’ doorstep!)
NOV. 23: 8:00 AM - 9:30 PM (lunch and dinner breaks) Wingate-at-Arlington, Bush Room, 1024 Brookhollow Plaza Dr. Arlington, TX (on Dallas' doorstep!) 
NOV. 24: 8:00 AM - 3:00 PM (banquet dinner at 5:00: $30)

REGISTRATION:  To get a better seat, please provide the information asked below and send to voice4vindication@yahoo.com.  
   To save a prime seat at the conference, go to Paypal at this site and donate $25 for a good seat, or $50 for a seat in the first row (good for all 3 days).

REGISTRATION INFORMATION:
1) NAME:
2) EMAIL ADDRESS:
3) NUMBER OF PERSONS, AND THEIR NAMES.

INDICATE IF YOU HAVE DONATED HERE AT PAYPAL FOR A GOOD SEAT.
SEND TO: voice4vindication@yahoo.com

SEE YOU AT THE CONFERENCE!
-----

REGISTER FOR THE WASHINGTON CONFERENCE TODAY!

SIGN UP FOR THE WASHINGTON, DC CONFERENCE!!!!!
(MEET AN INCREDIBLE ARRAY OF THE BEST SPEAKERS!)"The Warren Report 50 Years Later: A Critical Examination"
(What we know now, that we didn’t know then!)

Presented by: The JFK Historical Group
September 26-27-28

At: Crowne Plaza Old Town Hotel, Alexandria, VA. 901 North Fairfax | Alexandria, VA 22314Many of the leading experts on the JFK Assassination and critics of the Warren Commission findings will be meeting in Washington D.C. on this weekend, to give presentations on the various aspects of this topic.


Friday, Sept. 26: 8:15- 9:30 pm (11:45 - 12:15 Lunch; 5:05 - 56:30 Dinner)
Sat. Sept. 27: 8:30 AM - 9:30 pm (12:00 -12:30 Lunch; Banquet: 6:30 -7:30)
Sept. 28: Morning Mix: 9:00 Am -11:00 AM (MEET US ALL!)
REGISTRATION FORM(note: if registering for two people, PUT '2' and add the extra name in the space provided)____$125 : Entire Conference, all Events except Banquet Dinner
_____ $65 : Walk–up: single day session fee
_____$53 : Banquet Dinner & Keynote Presentation by Dr. Wecht
Name _________________________
Ph # or email (contact info) _________________________
(IF A 2ND PERSON IS ATTENDING WITH YOU)Name ________________________
                                                       Grand Total: ___________
HURRY!  Send your registration form and check or money order to:David Denton, JFK Historical Group1305 Hall StOlney, Il 62450

EMAIL: David Denton :  dentond@iecc.edu
For Hotel Accommodations at the Crowne Plaza Old Town Hotel, call 703-683-6000 and ask for the JFK Historical Group rate ($119 for single, $129 for double per night)


Below is a repeat of the above information, so you don't have to scroll back up:

September 26-27-28

At: Crowne Plaza Old Town Hotel, Alexandria, VA. 901 North Fairfax | Alexandria, VA 22314Many of the leading experts on the JFK Assassination and critics of the Warren Commission findings will be meeting in Washington D.C. on this weekend, to give presentations on the various aspects of this topic.


Friday, Sept. 26: 8:15- 9:30 pm (11:45 - 12:15 Lunch; 5:05 - 56:30 Dinner)
Sat. Sept. 27: 8:30 AM - 9:30 pm (12:00 -12:30 Lunch; Banquet: 6:30 -7:30)
Sept. 28: Morning Mix: 9:00 Am -11:00 AM (MEET US ALL!)
REGISTRATION FORM(note: if registering for two people, PUT '2' and add the extra name in the space provided)____$125 : Entire Conference, all Events except Banquet Dinner
_____ $65 : Walk–up: single day session fee
_____$53 : Banquet Dinner & Keynote Presentation by Dr. Wecht
Name _________________________
Ph # or email (contact info) _________________________
(IF A 2ND PERSON IS ATTENDING WITH YOU)Name ________________________
                                                       Grand Total: ___________
HURRY!  Send your registration form and check or money order to:David Denton, JFK Historical Group1305 Hall StOlney, Il 62450

EMAIL: David Denton :  dentond@iecc.edu
For Hotel Accommodations at the Crowne Plaza Old Town Hotel, call 703-683-6000 and ask for the JFK Historical Group rate ($119 for single, $129 for double per night)CONFERENCE ADDRESS:  901 North Fairfax | Alexandria, VA 22314.

http://jfkthelonegunmanmyth.blogspot....

this blog is blocked

THIS BLOG IS BLOCKED

IF THEY SAY LEE OSWALD KILLED KENNEDY--SHOW THEM THIS!

"Aren't hard facts and evidence always more believable than wild speculation and conjecture? And aren't many/most/all [JFK] conspiracy theories created out of just that -- speculation?"
THIS IS WHAT DAVID VON PEIN WRITES IN HIS BLOG, DECLARING:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LEE HARVEY OSWALD'S SOLE GUILT....

POINT-BY-POINT:
IN HIS ESSAY,WE'LL LOOK AT HOW DVP BEGINS HIS ARGUMENT, AND WHEHER HE CAN BE TRUSTED TO GIVE YOU THE FACTS. THEN YOU DECIDE WHETHER YOU WISH TO READ HIS HUGE BLOG ON THE SUBJECT.  I'M JUDYTH VARY BAKER, A WITNESS WHO KNEW LEE HARVEY OSWALD IN 1963.I SATE UNEQUIVOCALLY THAT OSWALD WAS INNOCENT. Judyth, 1963
LEE OSWALD HIMSELF TOLD US,"DO NOT BELIEVE THE SO-CALLED EVIDENCE." 
Lee H.Oswald, 11/22/63
THIS MAN -- LEE HARVEY OSWALD-- HAD NO  MOTIVE TO KILL KENNEDY. HE ADMIRED KENNEDY. HE DENIED KILLING KENNEDY. 


BELOW, YOU WILL FIND COGENT ARGUMENTS REFUTING THE SO-CALLED EVIDENCE.

PART ONE: THE FIRST FIVE ARGUMENTS

DVP WROTE: "When one piece of evidence that favors Lee Harvey Oswald's guilt is piled atop another, and another, and another....I'm just curious to know how many pieces of evidence that show Oswald killed President John F. Kennedy in 1963 it takes to sway a person away from the notion of conspiracy? Or, if nothing else, to sway that person away from the "Oswald is completely innocent" claims?"

==CORRECTION: Calling faked information 'evidence' does not make it so. When one piece of faked evidence is piled atop another, and another, and another... we must question the veracity and honesty of the person who dares pretend such evidence is solid, real and irrefutable.==


DVP: "From everything I can see, it's a veritable mountain of "Oswald Is Guilty" evidence (both circumstantial and physical). And not a single speck of it has been shown to be refutable with 100% absolute certainty."

OH, REALLY?  DVP WROTE: "Not a single speck of it has been shown to be refutable with 100% absolute certainty." That's a pretty high standard. And it's unreasonable.  When determining the guilt of the accused, a wide variety of evidence is tendered to the court. DVP mentions 'circumstantial and physical' kinds of evidence. He accepts this evidence and will not allow it to be rejected unless it has been proven to be 100% wrong.

Consider two people describing what a burglar stole from a house. Each is asked to describe what was stolen from them. One says her jewelry was stolen. The other says his watch and wallet were stolen. DVP's argument would say this evidence is not 100% acceptable because the witnesses described different items as being stolen.  However--and it is important--the witnesses were responding to the question "What was stolen from you?" They were not asked "Can you list everything that was stolen?"

Evidence-gathering can be subjective. It is not subject,in other words, to a stringent standard where "100%" agreement is necessary in order to accept the evidence.  What is accepted as evidence?  What is rejected? What honest researchers have learned, in the case of Oswald's so-called guilt, is that many statements, matters of evidence, and witnesses were rejected, not considered,or never identified. 

VIEW HERE JUST A FEW OF THE DOZENS OF EXAMPLES OF HOW LEE OSWALD WAS FRAMED

WE MUST CONSIDER THE NATURE OF EVIDENCE, AND WHY EVIDENCE DOESN'T HAVE TO BE 100% IRREFUTABLE IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED.

THIS IS A TWO-EDGED SWORD: MUCH OF THE EVIDENCE AGAINST LEE OSWALD MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, JUST AS MUCH OF THE EVIDENCE SUPPORTING ARGUMENTS FOR HIS INNOCENCE MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY.  

DEFINITION OF EVIDENCE(SKIP THIS PART IF YOU UNDERSTAND THAT MOST EVIDENCE IS 'NOT' 100% IRREFUTABLE.

Relevant EvidenceThe most basic rule of evidence requires that proposed evidence be relevant to the case. This means that you can introduce only evidence that tends to make a fact in the case more or less likely. Relevant evidence does not have to be particularly strong, it just has to be related in some way to the fact it is being offered to prove or disprove. The judge decides whether the proposed evidence is relevant. However, even relevant evidence is not allowed if another rule of evidence requires its exclusion.Real EvidenceReal evidence is a tangible object that played a part in the dispute. Examples of real evidence include the weapon used in a crime or the actual contract that was breached.Demonstrative EvidenceDemonstrative evidence is used in conjunction with the testimony of a witness. Demonstrative evidence helps the judge or jury understand to what the witness is testifying. Demonstrative evidence is admissible when it is a fair and accurate representation of the witness's testimony. A map or photograph used during witness testimony would be considered demonstrative evidence.Documentary EvidenceDocumentary evidence is usually a piece of writing that documents a fact or event that is in dispute. Common examples of documentary evidence include deeds, leases, ticket stubs, licenses and contracts. In some instances in which documentary evidence is present, it is the only evidence allowed on that issue. For example, if a lease is admitted into evidence in a renter's dispute, no one can testify about the contents of the lease.Testimonial EvidenceTestimonial evidence is verbal evidence given by a witness. Testimonial evidence is only admitted when the witness takes an oath to be honest and the witness has personal knowledge about what she is testifying. The witness must be able to remember and communicate what she perceived. Generally, witnesses may not testify to hearsay, that is, about what they heard another person say. There are exceptions to the hearsay rule, but they are quite complicated and require the expertise of a lawyer or judge to determine.Read more: What Kind of Evidence Is Acceptable in a Court of Law? | eHow http://www.ehow.com/info_8390755_kind-evidence-acceptable-court-law.html#ixzz2VfsuLH6B

NOW, BACK TO DVP:

HE WRITES: "Does the average researcher just simply ignore all of the evidence that supports Oswald's lone guilt (and every bit of hard evidence supports it), or is the idea of a conspiracy in JFK's assassination so ingrained into subsequent generations of people since the event took place that they feel they have no choice BUT to go with the flow and believe the conspiracy theorists?"

LET'S EXAMINE THE ABOVE STATEMENT.
"Does the average researcher just simply ignore all of the evidence that supports Oswald's lone guilt...?"

DVP ARGUES THAT THE EVIDENCE (THAT DVP ACCEPTS) IS 'IGNORED' BY THE 'AVERAGE' RESEARCHER. WHAT IS AN 'AVERAGE' RESEARCHER? WE ASSUME HE MEANS THIS:

"One who conducts scholarly or scientific investigation or 

inquiry.   See Synonyms at inquiry. 2. Close, careful study."

(definition 'researcher')


THE VERY MEANING OF 'RESEARCH' IS TO CONDUCT CLOSE, 

CAREFUL STUDY, DVP ASKS IF "ALL OF THE EVIDENCE THAT 

SUPPORTS OSWALD'S LONE GUILT" IS BEING IGNORED BY THE 

'AVERAGE RESEARCHER.'      

BASED ON THE DEFINITION OF A RESEARCHER, DVP'S QUESTION 

IS INAPPROPRIATE.


DVP'S NEXT STATEMENT:

DVP:"For I ask --- How could ALL of the following evidence against Lee Harvey Oswald have been either fabricated, planted, distorted, or in some manner faked? There's just TOO MUCH stuff here on the "Oswald Did It" table to ignore.

DVP PRESENTS A LOGICAL FALLACY (BIFURCATION) BY ASKING HOW COULD 'ALL' THE EVIDENCE HAVE BEEN PLANTED, DISTORTED, OR IN SOME MANNER FAKED? (HE LEAVES OUT 'IGNORED' AND 'UNFOUNDED.').

BIFURCATION: (either-or, black or white, all or nothing fallacy) 

assumes that two categories are mutually exclusive and exhaustive.  

(BIFURCATION)

DVP REPEATS HE FALLACY AGAIN:
DVP: "Granted, I'd agree that perhaps one or two of these things could have been manufactured to set up a patsy. But ALL of these items?! And complete silence be maintained by the many, many operatives who must certainly have been involved in the acts themselves and ensuing 40-year cover-up?!"

NOTE WELL: NUMEROUS OPERATIVES OVER THE YEARS HAVE SPOKEN OUT, SUCH AS DON ADDAMS, RICHARD HELMS AND E. HOWARD HUNT:

THE CIA'S E. HOWARD HUNT CONFESSED THAT OSWALD DIDN'T DO IT



NOW, WHO'S IGNORING EVIDENCE?

DVP CONTINUES IN THE SAME FALLACIOUS VEIN:

DVP: "Common sense (to me) dictates otherwise. And the "otherwise" leads anybody who isn't prone to cry "Conspiracy!" at every turn in the road to finally envision the fact that 24-year-old Lee Oswald was a lone nut who DID indeed pull off what the majority of people say couldn't happen in a million years."

DVP NOW CALLS ON 'AUTHORITY' TO BOLSTER HIS ARGUMENT:

"Author and ballistics expert Larry M. Sturdivan said it very well in his 2005 book"The JFK Myths", when he said this on page 246:

"While one of the pieces of physical evidence could conceivably have been faked by an expert, there is no possibility that an expert, or team of super-experts, could have fabricated the perfectly coordinated whole...with superhuman abilities to fake physical evidence that is in complete agreement with all the other faked evidence." -- Larry Sturdivan"

DVP USES: "APPEAL TO AUTHORITY": (ipse dixit --also called ad verecundiam sometimes) attempts to justify an argument by citing a highly admired or well-known (but not necessarily qualified) figure who supports the conclusion being offered.

LARRY M. STURDIVAN is a wound ballistics expert who appears in TV specials arguing that Oswald killed JFK. All well and good. His argument assumes that the faked evidence is "perfectly coordinated."  But this is not the case.  Had it been so,we would not be exerting ourselves to defend Oswald.It would have been an open-and-shut case. Since that is not the case, Sturdivant's statement is merely an appeal to authority, since it has nothing to do with his expertise on ballistics.

 DVP then gives us a long list of statements that he presents as solid fact. He begins with this statement:

"Lee Harvey Oswald murdered President John F. 

Kennedy without the assistance of others in November of 

1963 in Dallas, Texas, USA."

"The evidence against Lee H. Oswald includes these 

subtle tidbits:"


'SUBTLE?' 'TIDBITS'?  THE SERIOUS CHARGES, BELOW, ARE LISTED AS FACTS. OUR COMMENTS ARE IN RED AND UNDERLINED.

1.) Lee Harvey Oswald owned the rifle found on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository on Friday afternoon, November 22, 1963.

AS A WITNESS MYSELF, I KNEW LEE HARVEY OSWALD AND HIS TASTE IN GUNS. HE SPOKE WITH CRESCENT CITY GARAGE OWNER ADRIAN ALBA ABOUT BUYING A FINE RIFLE.  I NEVER SAW A RIFLE BELONGING TO LEE OSWALD. FURTHER, YOU CANNOT FIND A LOGICAL WAY FOR THE RIFLE TO HAVE REACHED NEW ORLEANS FROM TEXAS, AND THEN TO HAVE BEEN RETURNED TO TEXAS VIA RUTH PAINE'S CAR, WITHOUT ITS EVER BEING SEEN.

MARINA TOLD THE WARREN COMMISSION THAT LEE SAT WITH THE RIFLE DAY AFTER DAY IN BROAD VIEW OF A BUSY ROAD, YET NOT A SINGLE NOSY NEIGHBOR--AND THERE WERE PLENTY OF THEM--EVER SAW A RIFLE IN LEE'S HANDS. THEY KNEW WHEN HE HAD VISITORS, THEY SAID THEY SAW HIM READING ON THE PORCH FOR HOURS, AND THEY EVEN KNEW HOW MANY SUITCASES LEE TOOK WITH HIM WHEN HE LEFT FOR GOOD.  BUT THEY NEVER REPORTED A RIFLE IN NEW ORLEANS.  EVEN IF THE RIFLE REMAINED IN TEXAS, WE HAVE ONLY THE WORD OF THE DEMOHRENSCHILDTS AND MARINA THAT IT EVER EXISTED, THE DEMOHRENSCHILDTS ARE THE ONLY PERSONS TO HAVE SUPPLIED A BACKYARD PHOTO THAT WAS OBVIOUSLY MADE FROM A NEGATIVE THAT COULD BE LINKED TO THE SUSPICIOUS CAMERA 'FOUND' WEEKS LATER OH-SO-CONVENIENTLY IN RUTH PAINE'S GARAGE.

  LEE OSWALD WOULD NEVER HAVE PURCHASED A TRACEABLE, CLUMSY, INFERIOR RIFLE BY MONEY ORDER, FURTHER, IT WAS ORDERED UNDER THE NAME 'HIDELL'-- BUT OSWALD'S LIST OF RECIPIENTS AT THE POST OFFICE BOX HAD NO SUCH NAME,SO HOW WAS THE RIFLE DELIVERED? CONVENIENTLY, THE POST OFFICE HAD NO RECORD OF ITS DELIVERY,OR OF THE HANDGUN THAT SUPPOSEDLY CAME THE SAME DAY (CAN'T HAVE 'TWO''LOST' RECEIPTS, CAN WE? SO THEY WERE ANNOUNCED TO HAVE BEEN DELIVERED ON THE SAME DAY-- EVEN THOUGH THE TWO ITEMS WERE ORDERED WEEKS APART FROM EACH OTHER.).

  MIRACULOUSLY, THE RIFLE ORDER REACHED CHICAGO, AND THE MONEY ORDER WITH IT WAS PROCESSED --AND RIFLE PACKED --ONE DAY LATER, THOUGH THE MAIL ORDER WAS SUPPOSEDLY SENT ALL THE WAY FROM DALLAS TO CHICAGO BY REGULAR MAIL,USING A POSTBOX DROP MILES FROM WHERE OSWALD, WHO HAD NO CAR, WORKED AT THE TIME.  DVP GETS AROUND ALL OF THIS BY SIMPLY STATING THIS HAIRY RIFLE PROBLEM AS 'FACT.'

THIS GIVES THE READER A GOOD INDICATION OF HOW ACCURATE THE REST OF HIS LONG PROPAGANDA PIECE WILL BE. FOR FULL INFORMATION, SEE THESE LINKS:

"FAULTY EVIDENCE: THE CASE AGAINST LEE HARVEY OSWALD" by Michael T.Griffith

"The Rifle" by Gil Jesus

"The Spent Rifle Shells"by Gil Jesus

MARINA OSWALD DID ADMIT TO TAKING PHOTOS. BUT WHAT DVP DOESN'T TELL YOU IS THAT MARINA SAID SHE TOOK HER PHOTOS FROM A DIFFERENT DIRECTION: SEE:

http://www.mtgriffith.com/web_documents/fraud.htm

AND FOR A GOOD GENERAL SUMMARY, SEE:

"The Backyard Photos of Lee Harvey Oswald Are Fakes" by John Kays

AS WELL AS MY OWN ESSAY:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/38733842/Farid-s-Folly-and-the-Lee-Harvey-Oswald-Backyard-Photo-Fiasco

SEE YOUTUBE CHANNEL LOLA4JVB4LHO FOR VIDEOS CONCERNING LEE OSWALD'S INNOCENCE.

Eben Rey Interviews Judyth Vary Baker About the Kennedy Assassination, Her Book ME & LEE and Weaponizing Cancer

Eben Rey Interviews Judyth Vary Baker About the Kennedy Assassination, Me & Lee,  and Weaponizing Cancer


GO HERE TO DOWNLOAD PART ONE OF THE INTERVIEW:
 http://www.divshare.com/download/2347...
GO HERE TO DOWNLOAD PART TWO OF THE INTERVIEW:
http://www.divshare.com/download/2347...
GO HERE TO DOWNLOAD PART THREE OF THE INTERVIEW:
http://www.divshare.com/download/2347...Eben Rey is one of the most fascinating women I've ever met. She's strong, compassionate, and literate, with an open mind, unafraid to tackle controversial subjects.

Eben had already read Me & Lee and comprehended the enormity of what had happened in the cover-up of the Kennedy assassination, as well as the tragic consequences for those of us who wanted to cure cancer in the 60's and 70's. The cancer treatment industry-- focused on cutting, irradiating and chemically poisoning cancer cells-- would not be very interested in curing cancer when treating cancer was such a lucrative endeavor.  Why cure cancer, and, for that matter, why prevent it?

The interview below was originally supposed to last an hour (including breaks) but we ended up recording much more. The interview is broken into three segments for listening ease. Feel free to share this interview with everyone who is interested in the truth about the Kennedy assassination, the true role of Lee Harvey Oswald, and how cancer was weaponized.

I entered the USA for the first time in over five and a half years to give interviews and seminars on the contents of Me & Lee: How I Came to Know, Love and Lose Lee Harvey Oswald.  We had very little publicity, but wherever people heard about our sudden arrivals, we received tremendous welcomes. I will never forget the kindness of the people, and what it meant to them to learn firsthand information from a living witness. We encountered no hecklers whatsoever: all of that happened afterwards on the Internet.  I wondered if the reason we encountered no problems was because I had a professional bodyguard with me.  If I were a troublemaker, I certainly wouldn't want to have to deal with HIM!

In Chicago, I didn't have to worry, either, with former UDT-12/Navy Seal trained Jesse Ventura at my side, a man who towered over me and who brooks no foolishness. Jesse demonstrates immense self discipline, not responding to inappropriate questions and keeping his head; he doesn't drink, and only chews on his cigars.  My Dallas hero, Robert Groden, also flew in from Dallas, and Dr. Jim Fetzer also came to Chicago to join in the discussions.  Without

Caitlin Campbell is Judy Vary Baker, and Walker Harrison is Lee Harvey Oswald in Lisa Soland's Play, "The Sniper's Nest"
I commented that Lisa got "her" "just right." i'm almost 70 years old now.  That girl seems so far away now... that girl in New Orleans, whose career in cancer research was destroyed because she objected to using one or more "volunteers" from Angola Prison for a cancer experiment at Jackson, LA's mental hospital that, if successful, would kill the volunteers.  I had to lay it all aside, breaking my heart.

I'd never actually ever recover from the order to become "a vanilla girl" -- or die.  At least writing the book, and now seeing the play "The Sniper's Nest" is bringing the suppressed information to the fore.  Too late for Lee Oswald, but not too late for his wife, Marina, his children June and Rachel, and their children.  And it's not too late for America, to wake up and realize what was taken from them, when their government arranged for the murder of John F. Kennedy and the immediate framing of Oswald and cover up that followed. Many were duped, for far too long, even though from the very beginning, the framing of Lee Harvey Oswald and his murder only 47 hours after his arrest, in the presence of 70 Dallas police, brought serious questions to bear, especially by attorney Mark Lane.

The truth will set us free, if it's not too late.

JVB