Malcolm Blair-Robinson's Blog, page 125

June 2, 2016

Labour and Brexit: Corbyn Fights To Be Heard

Jeremy Corbyn yesterday made a perfectly sensible speech setting out very good reasons why Labour voters and supporters should vote to remain in the EU. It was an intelligent speech, full a sensible analysis and opinion, which should attract widespread attention. But will it?


Perhaps not as much as it should because this Referendum is not being either conducted or reported at a sensible level. The media are understandably obsessed by the brutal civil war being waged by opposing wings of the Tory party, led by Boris for Out and Dave for In, which operates on sound-bites offering wild promises which cannot be delivered, while stoking ever more fear among voters who are ever more confused and of whom only a tiny handful wanted this contest in the first place. A rational and cerebral Corbyn stumping the country laying  out the very real advantages to working people of EU membership and very real risks to jobs and prosperity, at least in the short term, of leaving, is just not big news.


Where I think all the politicians fail is that the EU is not about trade or jobs. It is about bringing harmony, fellowship, open borders and freedom to live and work wherever you want, ending centuries of struggle and strife costing millions and millions of lives. The one time, during the very many acts of remembrance of the fallen, and especially during the centenary commemorations for WWI, it is possible to feel that all that suffering and sacrifice just might have been worth it, is when one marvels at the extraordinary achievement of reconciliation which is the EU. To vote to leave is to betray the sacrifice of those before us, who have given us such a much better deal than the one that cost them their lives.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 02, 2016 23:58

Vintage Psycho-Thriller: Download Now .99p

 Product DetailsThe latest edition of this ever popular psycho-thriller, now in its twentieth year, has a dramatic new cover and is offered for a limited period at the special price of £5.99 paperback and .99p  Download. A haunting tale of passion and the paranormal, written in the style of its setting in the 1920s.


A tiny English village slumbers on the Surrey/Sussex borders, but the pastoral exterior hides a number of nightmare secrets.

The return of a young man after a long absence stirs memories of the horrific murder of his mother and uncle years earlier and of an ancient curse delivered upon the family in Napoleonic times. The villagers’ unease grows as the young man embarks upon an affair with the local farmer’s daughter, and a series of mysterious deaths seem to follow in his wake. Full of authentic period detail, this is a tale which will haunt readers long after the last page has been turned.


Amazon UK             Amazon US

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 02, 2016 10:06

May 31, 2016

Jutland Remebered

With its terrible loss of life and serious faults in fighting protocols for a then modern sea battle, the British nation was aghast in 1916 when the expected Trafalgar style victory over the German fleet not only failed to materialise, but what did was three times the deaths and more ships lost than  the Germans, who on those two measures claimed victory. The carnage of the Somme was shortly to follow, so 1916 was a sobering year for Britain, its pride and its Empire. It was also the first year of grief for families on a scale not previously imagined or foreseen.


A century later as commemorations are organised to remember the dead of Jutland on both sides, a more measured view suggests that what was at one level a failure of battle potential, was at another a strategic victory. For the German fleet retreated to port, never to venture out again and the Royal Navy enforced its blockade, which reduced German civilians to malnutrition and hunger, which at times came close to starvation. Later in the Atlantic, the German counter-attack with U boats sinking vast tonnages of merchant shipping carrying essential supplies, Great Britain came as close as it  ever got to losing the war.


These are sobering reflections since both strategies were aimed at bringing the enemy to its knees through civilian suffering rather than battlefield triumph, a form of warfare of which the United States has never been victim except at its own hand in the Civil War. It is perhaps fitting that the UK referendum on whether to remain a member of the EU comes in the interval between the centenaries of Jutland and the Somme.


It also trumps all other reasons of why it is we joined the EU in the first place and why it is imperative that we remain as one of the keystone powers of perhaps the greatest union of conciliation  in history.



 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 31, 2016 02:59

May 28, 2016

Tony Blair: Eve of Infamy?

According to leaks, the Chilcot Inquiry Report, finally due out in July, will be very bad news for Tony Blair. Such as is left of his political reputation, and that is not much, will apparently be shredded by disclosures and judgements about how on earth the decision to attack Iraq, to defend against the imminent use of non-existent ‘weapons of mass destruction’, was taken. So Tony is trying to get in early to build a new consensus about some equally fictitious political strong-point called the centre. The problem is that for a centre to exist it has to be central to something. It might be a circle, or a square, or a forest, or a crowd. In politics it has to occupy the no-man’s land where consensus can be built between the priorities of left and right.


But a political centre without powerful left and right wings will not fly any more than a wingless plane fuselage. We have been governed from the centre since the demise of Thatcher and have ended up in never ending austerity, the rich getting ever richer at the expense of the poor, failures of strategic military and foreign policy, failure to secure power supplies, failures in health, eduction, care for the elderly, the vulnerable and the mentally ill, failure to solve the housing crisis, failure to control excessive inflation of housing costs, failure to end the budget deficit, failure to reduce the trade deficit; the list is all but never ending.


So now this extraordinarily arrogant man who seems a stranger to humility, remorse, clear thinking and a sense of when the time has come to shut up, dares to tell the country that to elect a Corbyn Government would be a dangerous experiment. You may recall he made some fatuous comment about heart transplants which ensured Corbyn’s landslide in the Labour leadership election, so it looks as if a Corbyn government is an increasing certainty in 2020. The reason is simple. Corbyn is a man of integrity whom people instinctively trust. Or put simply, the opposite of Blair.


 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 28, 2016 10:10

May 27, 2016

Nazi Era Thriller: Download or Paperback

 


Hitler's First Lady Lise Bauer is born in Africa in 1906, brought to England by her parents from where she is expelled with them in 1914, because her father is an East Prussian. They settle in America and become Americans, but return to Europe in the 1920’s. Here Lise is involved in the rise of the Nazi party, marries one of Hitler’s closest associates and later has a relationship with Hitler himself, before divorcing her husband and marrying an English friend of Hitler’s deputy, Rudolf Hess. She settles again in England with the consent of the security services and she and her husband establish a cell to act as a secret communication channel between Hitler and Churchill at the critical period of WWII.

The novel offers a new view of Hitler’s sexual relationships, a plot to overthrow Churchill and the flight to Scotland by Rudolf Hess. Using historical characters often portrayed in a new light, this account challenges the accepted view of recorded history. It leaves readers wondering why they were they never told about the double lives and events shrouded in secrecy.   UK         US

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 27, 2016 11:54

Economic Scares: Stop it!

Decisions driven by fear are rarely the best. If they turn out wrong and the fear turns out to have been either groundless or confected (as in the Iraq War and Weapons of Mass Destruction) there is a sense of national outrage which never goes away. It is therefore important to avoid such tactics in national conversations such as the current referendum campaign. The latest scare that if we leave the EU all our pensions will go down the tubes or whatever is ridiculous.


There will be an economic event in the not too distant future whether we leave the EU or stay in it. This is because our unbalanced economy, with manufacturing in decline, borrowing up, growth down, imports up, house price inflation rampant, housing costs preposterous, productivity low, the rich getting richer at the expense of the poor and the gap between the two growing all the time, services starved of cash and a whole lot more, is on life support and has to change. This could happen because of the shock of leaving the EU or because we stay. It could happen because of something in China, or Russia or the US (President Trump?) or it could happen because the gasket suddenly blows.


But it will happen. There will be a crash in asset values and a dramatic fall in the value of the pound. And so there should be because both are mathematically essential to create the conditions in which real growth and prosperity for all, more fairly shared but there for everyone from dustman to Duke, can actually happen. But happen it must.


The issue of Europe is quite separate. It is political and emotional and to do with brotherhood and well-being, peace rather than conflict, working together rather than toiling alone, being part of something bigger than oneself. Either you believe that the EU is the most successful and worthy political union since the fall of the Roman Empire which has put an end to centuries of pointless slaughter and you will vote to remain a central part of it,  or like Boris, you believe it is as bad as Hitler and the Nazis and you will vote against. If you cannot make up your mind or you scared and spooked, it is probably better to stay at home. Then whatever the outcome it will not be your fault. Or will it?

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 27, 2016 04:34

May 26, 2016

May 25, 2016

The Economy: Critical Points

What is so deplorable about the endless economic sniping between Remain and Leave, is that each is using various figures and statistics to mean the opposite of what is actually the fact. So this post will set out some key economic pointers and leave you to decide which campaign would be most likely to deliver on these issues. I would remind you that I am voting Remain for political and historic reasons, which I believe over-ride everything else. Although there will be an economic impact either way, neither economics nor immigration will affect or influence my vote. So the following can be trusted as impartial.


There can be no long term recovery in this country with the current economic model based on consumption driven mainly by borrowing against ever inflating assets, mainly house prices, and fed almost entirely by imports. This sucks money from the base to the top, makes the rich richer and the poor poorer and the middle squeezed by low productivity and excessive living costs. It does not deliver sufficient growth in GDP to provide a taxation base large enough to fund the demand for services at the optimum cost/efficiency ratio. The future is one of bumping along the bottom of a low growth track, punctuated with slow downs or recessions like the one now gripping the manufacturing sector.


The economy needs about a decade of sustained and significant growth in the order of 5% annually in order leave austerity behind and offer the rising generation a future on a level to that enjoyed by their parents and grandparents, especially the latter. That can only be achieved if we import less, make more for home consumption and for export, reduce borrowing as an economic driver, and halt the headlong inflation of assets ahead of inflation of incomes. This has been promised by all the political parties but delivered by none.


That is because not one of them dare come clean about what has to be done to achieve the illusive rebalancing, because they know that the public will take fright at the prospect. Yet without attending to the root causes, there will be no positive outcome. The root causes are first sterling is historically much too high and needs to come down to much closer to parity with the US dollar. The second is priority of capital over labour has to be redressed so that labour once again becomes an engine of growth. Third imports have to fall off a cliff and exports climb one. Home production must make up for the lost imports and the surplus over must lead the export drive. Fourth housing costs have to be cut so that rents and mortgages take a much smaller proportion of income. Finally a huge economic stimulus must be pumped into the base of the economy to reboot it, without borrowing any money.


This can only be done by boosting the money supply at the base while restricting it at the top, so that asset investment becomes risky and less profitable and saving and investment in new wealth creation becomes more rewarding. That will mean house prices falling to a ratio of an average house costing not more than three times the average annual income and that the Treasury, not the Bank of England will have to print a great deal of money. There is not a single politician of any party who seems to understand any of this and if there is, either cannot articulate it, or has the courage to come clean.


If you look at that economic fact sheet you will see it makes no difference whatsoever whether we are in or out of Europe. Our economic problems are fundamental. Sort them and GB can prosper anywhere and with anybody. Europe is about a lot more than money and it is time the conversation moved on to more uplifting visions from both Remain and Leave.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 25, 2016 08:20

May 23, 2016

Is Parliament Sovereign? No. The People Are.

This is the problem with the Brexit argument. The political class in England (not in Scotland)  consider parliament sovereign. It is not. In a democracy the people are sovereign and they exercise their sovereignty through democratic institutions of which parliament in the UK is the senior. But the people also exercise their sovereignty in the EU through their votes to elect members of the European parliament, as well as electing the national government which sits on the various instruments of EU governance. So the EU enhances the sovereignty of the people, while restricting the power of their UK elected parliamentarians, in favour of a wider power they, the people, exercise in Europe. So leaving Europe would reduce the sovereign power of the British people.


The latest Brexit argument is that Britain is becoming ‘ungovernable’ because of EU interference. This is equally untrue. The function of government is to manage the nation’s needs, resources and security in an effective order which delivers all the advantages of modern civilisation and aspirations for human advancement. It is not continually to invent new regulations and laws. At one time laws were local, imposed by the Baron. Later they became national. They are now becoming global. In the EU there is harmonisation of basic rights and regulations which govern everyday living and trade, which benefits everybody. I have never encountered a single individual in the UK whose life is being degraded by a European law, the driver for which has often been the UK itself. Basic laws are like human rights. They are fundamental and are best when universal.


What government should be doing is to make sure that the infrastructure is cutting edge; power generation is effective, environmentally friendly and delivering cost effective energy; education delivers rewarding lives to the young; the healthcare system is timely and efficient; housing is plentiful and affordable to rent or buy; poverty is eliminated; unemployment is minimal; the standard of living increases; the quality of life improves and so son and so on.


Yet under every one of the above headings this government and its predecessors going back many years have and are still failing. This is because they are preoccupied with changing structures by new laws, rather than by improving efficiency by investing in, streamlining and modernising functions. So health and education, for example, are subject to never ending re-organisations, but continually fall short of expectation. Other areas of government responsibility suffer from neglect, for example prisons and the prison system or power generation and capacity renewal.


At least the public at large is to some extent protected from the worst outcomes of serial failure by UK governance, because of the EU umbrella. Take that away and everybody is going to get very wet.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 23, 2016 00:59

May 21, 2016

Brexit Thoughts 11: It Get’s Worse

There is almost a case to be made to close down the referendum campaign, so much nonsense is being talked by both sides, with a period of silence till the day we vote. The basic facts are clear. Either you regard yourself as European and see in the EU a huge advance in human fellowship to benefit peace, prosperity, life chances and life quality. Or you see yourself as English and see an independent, on its own, island nation as much preferable to a  confederation, which pokes its nose into every nook and cranny of your life. Either you will vote for one or the other or you will stay at home.


If it goes Yes the markets will have a euphoria moment, before all the underlying problems of our economy and services will begin once more to loom large. If it goes No, there is no telling what will happen, but euphoria, outside the old Empire wing of the Tory party, will be in short supply. Because the sheer scale of unraveling a whole legal, economic and social partnership of this complexity has never before been undertaken, and because the prospect has always been regarded as so outlandish, nobody, including Brexit grandees, has any plans prepared.


Yesterday we had Gove telling us that if we remain,  five million people would invade our shores from five new EU member countries, in the queue to join by 2020 or there abouts, and whose citizens would be free to come and live here, overwhelming our already overwhelmed public services. That is such tosh. While we remain members of the EU not one single country can join unless we say so and agree. We have a veto. And no citizen would be entitled to come here for seven years anyway. But what about the two million Brits working in the EU? What happens to them if we leave?


Today Osborne declares that if we quit the EU house prices will fall and so will the pound. Well that is very good news and the first coherent reasons that this blog has heard for voting Leave. But Osborne is for Remain? Another forecasting muddle apparently. Perhaps it’s time for him to go too.


 


 

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on May 21, 2016 08:35