Mark L. Van Name's Blog, page 198
August 19, 2012
On the road again: Seattle, day 1
The plan looked good: Fly from RDU in the morning, but not the insanely early morning; arrive in Seattle right before evening; grab what promised to be an excellent dinner at Sitka & Spruce, a restaurant that's been making some noise; and head to the hotel with plenty of time remaining to finish the evening's work comfortably.
Unfortunately, the weather had an entirely different plan, so by the time we left RDU about 2:00 p.m., more than two hours late, I had downshifted my goals to a rather less ambitious set: Arrive in Seattle late, hope our luggage had made it, and eat room-service dinner while working.
Matters then picked up. I was lucky enough to receive an upgrade on the first leg, and that plane offered bandwidth, so I was able to work in relative comfort for the entire flight. Our layover in DFW grew to almost two hours, so we enjoyed delicious Red Mango parfaits and then shifted to the Admiral's Club for more work. (If Red Mango ever opens a franchise near my house or office, I am in so much trouble.) The only open seats on the second flight were in first class, so it was upgrade city once again. Dinner ended up being airplane food, but it was edible and bland, about as much as one can reasonably ask these days from a meal in the sky.
At SEA, our luggage was actually in the first few bags off the conveyor.
Yeah, we hit the hotel late, and, yeah, work had piled up a bit, but so it goes. For a day with a huge travel delay, today went well.
And now, our IFAOTD (Ignorant Fucking Asshole Of The Day) award goes to GOP Senatorial candidate Todd Akin for one of the most offensive interview responses in recent memory:
Let's hope that the good people of Missouri do not forget this sorry asshat's comments and send him packing back home on election day.
Unfortunately, the weather had an entirely different plan, so by the time we left RDU about 2:00 p.m., more than two hours late, I had downshifted my goals to a rather less ambitious set: Arrive in Seattle late, hope our luggage had made it, and eat room-service dinner while working.
Matters then picked up. I was lucky enough to receive an upgrade on the first leg, and that plane offered bandwidth, so I was able to work in relative comfort for the entire flight. Our layover in DFW grew to almost two hours, so we enjoyed delicious Red Mango parfaits and then shifted to the Admiral's Club for more work. (If Red Mango ever opens a franchise near my house or office, I am in so much trouble.) The only open seats on the second flight were in first class, so it was upgrade city once again. Dinner ended up being airplane food, but it was edible and bland, about as much as one can reasonably ask these days from a meal in the sky.
At SEA, our luggage was actually in the first few bags off the conveyor.
Yeah, we hit the hotel late, and, yeah, work had piled up a bit, but so it goes. For a day with a huge travel delay, today went well.
And now, our IFAOTD (Ignorant Fucking Asshole Of The Day) award goes to GOP Senatorial candidate Todd Akin for one of the most offensive interview responses in recent memory:
“If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”Yeah, he apologized later, but, really? No, you don't get off for that kind of comment.
Let's hope that the good people of Missouri do not forget this sorry asshat's comments and send him packing back home on election day.
Published on August 19, 2012 20:59
August 18, 2012
The Expendables 2
Watch any trailer for this movie, and you'll know if you're in its target audience. If you're still not sure, if you haven't seen at least five films of each of its main stars, you may well want to give it a pass.
I, on the other hand, had no doubts that this movie was for me. I've seen just about every film of all of the stars, and I had a great time at the first movie. I walked into the theater tonight fully prepared for a little under two hours of mindless, unrealistic violence, dumb dialog, and in-jokes delivered badly.
The Expendables 2 delivered all of those things by the extended magazine full.
I could explain the plot, but there's no point. It's just there to put our team in interesting situations in which they can kill many people. I could talk about the acting, but, really, there was hardly any. I could review some of the many inside jokes, but either I'd be ruining them for you or you wouldn't get them, so there's no point.
The decision is simple: If you're in the audience for this movie, you'll have a grand time and laugh your ass off. If you're not, I don't know how you'll react, but the odds are that you won't like it.
Predictably, I had a wonderful time and now hope for an unrated Director's Cut DVD.
I, on the other hand, had no doubts that this movie was for me. I've seen just about every film of all of the stars, and I had a great time at the first movie. I walked into the theater tonight fully prepared for a little under two hours of mindless, unrealistic violence, dumb dialog, and in-jokes delivered badly.
The Expendables 2 delivered all of those things by the extended magazine full.
I could explain the plot, but there's no point. It's just there to put our team in interesting situations in which they can kill many people. I could talk about the acting, but, really, there was hardly any. I could review some of the many inside jokes, but either I'd be ruining them for you or you wouldn't get them, so there's no point.
The decision is simple: If you're in the audience for this movie, you'll have a grand time and laugh your ass off. If you're not, I don't know how you'll react, but the odds are that you won't like it.
Predictably, I had a wonderful time and now hope for an unrated Director's Cut DVD.
Published on August 18, 2012 20:59
August 17, 2012
Dralion
One of Cirque du Soleil's traveling shows, Dralion, came to Raleigh two nights ago, so of course a group of us went to see it. As you can probably tell from the name, it focused on an East/West fusion Chinese acrobatic arts and Cirque's trademark style.
As the above trailer suggests, the show was wonderful. What the video can't capture, though, is the magic of seeing these feats live. I admit to being a huge Cirque fan, so perhaps I'm biased, but I enjoyed this one very much. I was particularly fond of the men diving through sets of vertical rings, something that reads as somewhere between dumb and dull but that in person is quite amazing to see.
I was saddened to see many, many, many empty seats in the arena; the people here in the Triangle have no idea what they're missing. If this show comes to your city, do better than we did, and pack whatever venue is hosting it. You'll be glad you did.
As the above trailer suggests, the show was wonderful. What the video can't capture, though, is the magic of seeing these feats live. I admit to being a huge Cirque fan, so perhaps I'm biased, but I enjoyed this one very much. I was particularly fond of the men diving through sets of vertical rings, something that reads as somewhere between dumb and dull but that in person is quite amazing to see.
I was saddened to see many, many, many empty seats in the arena; the people here in the Triangle have no idea what they're missing. If this show comes to your city, do better than we did, and pack whatever venue is hosting it. You'll be glad you did.
Published on August 17, 2012 20:02
August 16, 2012
Harry Harrison
Yesterday, the SF field lost another member of its old guard: Harry Harrison, SF author and SFWA Grandmaster, passed away. I never met Harrison, so I have no personal stories to tell of him, but he influenced aspects of my work, and I am saddened at his death.
When I was a teenager, like so many other SF readers I discovered and instantly became a huge fan of his Stainless Steel Rat stories. I devoured the books and stories as soon as I could find them. I loved the attitude, the humor, and the style Harrison brought to them. I then read more of Harrison's work, watched and enjoyed Soylent Green, the film based on his novel Make Room! Make Room!, and generally came to assume, as one does of authors you've read heavily, that he would always be around, creating more stories and books. 2010's The Stainless Steel Rat Returns, with its new adventure for James Bolivar DiGriz, aka Slippery Jim, aka the Stainless Steel Rat, served to confirm that belief.
It was, of course, a foolish feeling, one I knew as such when I paused to examine it, but I rarely did.
When I was writing my second novel, Slanted Jack, I focused quite a lot of the action on an old pal of Jon Moore's, the best con man Jon has ever known: Slanted Jack. Note the initials match Slippery Jim's. Jack's real name was Jack Gridiz. That I created Jack's name by moving around a few letters of the Stainless Steel Rat's real name is equally obvious. Yeah, I was paying tribute to possibly the greatest SF con man--and certainly the one with the funniest adventures.
For some time, I've harbored a fan-boy hope that I might one day meet Harrison and give him a copy of the book. In my fantasy, he liked it. Now, of course, that chance is gone.
What remains, though, is his work and all that it has inspired. With Harrison, that is a very great deal indeed.
When I was a teenager, like so many other SF readers I discovered and instantly became a huge fan of his Stainless Steel Rat stories. I devoured the books and stories as soon as I could find them. I loved the attitude, the humor, and the style Harrison brought to them. I then read more of Harrison's work, watched and enjoyed Soylent Green, the film based on his novel Make Room! Make Room!, and generally came to assume, as one does of authors you've read heavily, that he would always be around, creating more stories and books. 2010's The Stainless Steel Rat Returns, with its new adventure for James Bolivar DiGriz, aka Slippery Jim, aka the Stainless Steel Rat, served to confirm that belief.
It was, of course, a foolish feeling, one I knew as such when I paused to examine it, but I rarely did.
When I was writing my second novel, Slanted Jack, I focused quite a lot of the action on an old pal of Jon Moore's, the best con man Jon has ever known: Slanted Jack. Note the initials match Slippery Jim's. Jack's real name was Jack Gridiz. That I created Jack's name by moving around a few letters of the Stainless Steel Rat's real name is equally obvious. Yeah, I was paying tribute to possibly the greatest SF con man--and certainly the one with the funniest adventures.
For some time, I've harbored a fan-boy hope that I might one day meet Harrison and give him a copy of the book. In my fantasy, he liked it. Now, of course, that chance is gone.
What remains, though, is his work and all that it has inspired. With Harrison, that is a very great deal indeed.
Published on August 16, 2012 11:33
August 15, 2012
Ruby Sparks
The moment I heard about this movie, I wanted to see it; how could a writer resist? Learning that the film's directors were the same as those that created the wonderful Little Miss Sunshine only increased my desire. The trailer, though big fun, made me a little nervous both about the schmaltz level and how the writers would resolve the moral dilemma they'd posed themselves, but I was still game to go.
So, off a group of us went the other night to a local art theater to check it out.
I'm glad we did.
If you haven't seen this one yet, I very much don't want to spoil it for you, and I recommend you not read any other spoilers, so I'm going to have to keep this short and vague.
The story does address its moral implications, and it does avoid excessive sentimentality, so the writers largely addressed my two big concerns. The beginning is slow, but I'm willing to forgive it that. The actors were uniformly strong, with Annette Bening particularly wonderful in a small role. The movie's greatest weakness, at least to me, is its ending--not its emotional climax, which is satisfying, but the denouement. That said, all of us left discussing it, which is a good sign, and opinions varied, which is another good sign. About it, though, I will say no more, lest I spoil it.
Ruby Sparks was one of the more intelligent, emotionally complex films I've seen recently, and I'm glad to be able to recommend it strongly. Definitely catch this one before it vanishes.
So, off a group of us went the other night to a local art theater to check it out.
I'm glad we did.
If you haven't seen this one yet, I very much don't want to spoil it for you, and I recommend you not read any other spoilers, so I'm going to have to keep this short and vague.
The story does address its moral implications, and it does avoid excessive sentimentality, so the writers largely addressed my two big concerns. The beginning is slow, but I'm willing to forgive it that. The actors were uniformly strong, with Annette Bening particularly wonderful in a small role. The movie's greatest weakness, at least to me, is its ending--not its emotional climax, which is satisfying, but the denouement. That said, all of us left discussing it, which is a good sign, and opinions varied, which is another good sign. About it, though, I will say no more, lest I spoil it.
Ruby Sparks was one of the more intelligent, emotionally complex films I've seen recently, and I'm glad to be able to recommend it strongly. Definitely catch this one before it vanishes.
Published on August 15, 2012 20:56
August 14, 2012
An expensive small error
A couple of days ago, I was calling a local friend when I made a rather expensive and embarrassing mistake. Our area has grown enough that even when you are calling someone with the same area code, you now have to dial that area code. My area code is 919.
I started punching the number I was calling into the very old handset of my land-line phone. That phone is old enough that the keys are sticky and sometimes repeat. So, by accident, I dialed 911. To the best of my knowledge, I did not hit the Talk button to make the call and instead immediately disconnected. I figured that because I had not sent the numbers, I was safe. I then dialed the correct number and began a conversation.
During that conversation, I heard the sound that alerts you to an incoming call, but I ignored it; I was, after all, already talking to a person.
When I disconnected, I checked to see the source of the call I'd missed and found that it was my city's emergency services group.
Oh, shit.
Either I had accidentally transmitted the numbers, or phones automatically send as soon as they detect 911; I don't know, and I don't plan to experiment to find out.
I immediately called 911, tried to explain my error, and was routed twice before I got someone who would listen. That person informed me that because I had not answered the return call, a law-enforcement officer would have to visit my house. I tried to save them the expense, but to no avail; the rule is that they have to come.
That rule even makes a certain sense, because what if I was being coerced to say nothing was wrong? Erring on the side of caution is fine by me.
So, the officer came, was fully aware he was wasting his time, was nonetheless gracious, and left.
I hate that I wasted his time and cost taxpayer money.
I think I owe my local sheriff's office some cookies.
I started punching the number I was calling into the very old handset of my land-line phone. That phone is old enough that the keys are sticky and sometimes repeat. So, by accident, I dialed 911. To the best of my knowledge, I did not hit the Talk button to make the call and instead immediately disconnected. I figured that because I had not sent the numbers, I was safe. I then dialed the correct number and began a conversation.
During that conversation, I heard the sound that alerts you to an incoming call, but I ignored it; I was, after all, already talking to a person.
When I disconnected, I checked to see the source of the call I'd missed and found that it was my city's emergency services group.
Oh, shit.
Either I had accidentally transmitted the numbers, or phones automatically send as soon as they detect 911; I don't know, and I don't plan to experiment to find out.
I immediately called 911, tried to explain my error, and was routed twice before I got someone who would listen. That person informed me that because I had not answered the return call, a law-enforcement officer would have to visit my house. I tried to save them the expense, but to no avail; the rule is that they have to come.
That rule even makes a certain sense, because what if I was being coerced to say nothing was wrong? Erring on the side of caution is fine by me.
So, the officer came, was fully aware he was wasting his time, was nonetheless gracious, and left.
I hate that I wasted his time and cost taxpayer money.
I think I owe my local sheriff's office some cookies.
Published on August 14, 2012 20:57
August 13, 2012
Little Hen
When friends told me about Greg Cox's gushing review for this new restaurant in Apex, I knew I had to go. So, the other night a group of us ventured to a part of the area I rarely visit for a dinner at Little Hen.
The menu changes daily, as you'd expect from a place that emphasizes using whatever its farm partners make available that day. Our table opted for the farmstead feast, both meat-eater and vegetarian versions, which are basically its versions of a tasting menu.
Our first course was a charcuterie and cheese platter, with all but one of the goodies on it coming from local sources. We sampled a "parma ham" from nearby Johnston County, a local salami, and a wonderful soppresata. The six cheeses ranged from a brie to a goat to a gruyere.
After that, we moved to a tomato salad that, for the non-vegetarians, mixed heirloom tomatoes with marinated, grilled shrimp, small watermelon balls, and a fennel olive oil. It was delicious and summery.
For our main courses, each pair of us split one of the restaurant's signature "Big Boards." This dish is exactly what it sounds like: a large cutting board covered with food.
The vegetarians faced this mountain of goodies.
As always, click on an image to see a larger version.
Grilled squash, fresh green peas, shelled peas, fried green tomatoes, fried squash, a tomato salad, and something that they called gnocchi but that tasted more like polenta were just some of the things on this platter. I am not a squash fan, but everything I tasted was yummy.
As good as the vegetarian dishes were, however, the Tuscan Heritage Pork board, which two of us split, was way better. (Of course, as a meat eater, I would say that.)
They cut the meat from the giant pork chop into slices that they put next to the bone. They left on the fat, so some trimming was necessary, but every piece was tender and succulent and lovely. The ham tasted as rich as top-notch barbecue, and the cheese grits were a delight. The two vegetable salads and the squash were also tasty, but the two of us barely made a dent in them and didn't even finish all the meat; I was determined not to stuff myself and to save room for dessert.
That was a good choice. We sampled four of the desserts, and all were tasty, particularly the blueberry pie. The tiny baked Alaska with sorbet interior was a surprisingly successful riff on this classic dish.
My understanding is that Greg Cox gave four and a half stars (out of five) to Little Hen, and I can't go that far. The dishes, though lovely, lacked the complexity that such a rating requires. Put differently, the food here wasn't as wonderful as the meals I've had at Panciuto, which to me is now the best of the local restaurants.
That said, the dinner was excellent, and Little Hen will definitely get more of my business. Do bring a big appetite, because the portions are large, but definitely check it out.
The menu changes daily, as you'd expect from a place that emphasizes using whatever its farm partners make available that day. Our table opted for the farmstead feast, both meat-eater and vegetarian versions, which are basically its versions of a tasting menu.
Our first course was a charcuterie and cheese platter, with all but one of the goodies on it coming from local sources. We sampled a "parma ham" from nearby Johnston County, a local salami, and a wonderful soppresata. The six cheeses ranged from a brie to a goat to a gruyere.
After that, we moved to a tomato salad that, for the non-vegetarians, mixed heirloom tomatoes with marinated, grilled shrimp, small watermelon balls, and a fennel olive oil. It was delicious and summery.
For our main courses, each pair of us split one of the restaurant's signature "Big Boards." This dish is exactly what it sounds like: a large cutting board covered with food.
The vegetarians faced this mountain of goodies.

Grilled squash, fresh green peas, shelled peas, fried green tomatoes, fried squash, a tomato salad, and something that they called gnocchi but that tasted more like polenta were just some of the things on this platter. I am not a squash fan, but everything I tasted was yummy.
As good as the vegetarian dishes were, however, the Tuscan Heritage Pork board, which two of us split, was way better. (Of course, as a meat eater, I would say that.)

They cut the meat from the giant pork chop into slices that they put next to the bone. They left on the fat, so some trimming was necessary, but every piece was tender and succulent and lovely. The ham tasted as rich as top-notch barbecue, and the cheese grits were a delight. The two vegetable salads and the squash were also tasty, but the two of us barely made a dent in them and didn't even finish all the meat; I was determined not to stuff myself and to save room for dessert.
That was a good choice. We sampled four of the desserts, and all were tasty, particularly the blueberry pie. The tiny baked Alaska with sorbet interior was a surprisingly successful riff on this classic dish.

My understanding is that Greg Cox gave four and a half stars (out of five) to Little Hen, and I can't go that far. The dishes, though lovely, lacked the complexity that such a rating requires. Put differently, the food here wasn't as wonderful as the meals I've had at Panciuto, which to me is now the best of the local restaurants.
That said, the dinner was excellent, and Little Hen will definitely get more of my business. Do bring a big appetite, because the portions are large, but definitely check it out.
Published on August 13, 2012 20:37
August 12, 2012
The Bourne Legacy
I've mentioned before that I was excited to see this film, so last night a group of us caught the late show at our local megaplex.
I entered the theater prepared to love this movie. Over the previous week, we'd watched the three earlier Bourne films in order, and they held up well. The first was the strongest, of course, with the second nearly as good and the third a bit worse, but all were strong films. Damon's consistent performance, a blend of mostly deadpan, machine-like expressions and movements interrupted by moments of passion and action, never let you forget that Jason Bourne was a different, messed-up superagent.
In this reboot of the franchise, Jeremy Renner's Aaron Cross is, fairly enough, a very different person. He's supposed to be an improved version of Bourne, but one with more self-awareness and concerns--neither of which his creators realize he has. In a telling opening sequence, writer/director Tony Gilroy, the man who controlled the previous three films, shows us Renner shirtless and muscular in icy waters in Alaska, so we know he's a tough dude. I don't recall a single shirtless Matt Damon shot in the earlier installments, but that was fine, because the weird, machine-like character Damon portrayed was enough to convince us that he was as badass as the fight scenes made him appear. The opening shot made Renner start out a weaker, more conventional character.
I've read complaints about the plot, but I thought it held up well enough as long as you suspended your disbelief enough to accept the silly science behind this (and the other) films. I had no problem with that. The continuing revelations of layers upon layers of secret government programs was also silly, but it's in the tradition of the earlier films and, hey, who doesn't love a good conspiracy?
I didn't see real any chemistry between Renner and Rachel Weisz, so most of her actions seemed to be largely the product of the plot's needs. Fortunately, the action scenes kept us moving well enough and the actors did good enough jobs that their interactions didn't hurt the film either.
My favorite performance was Edward Norton's, who's always at his best when he's playing a bad guy. Here, he was a very bad guy indeed, but one who thought he was a good guy, and his character brimmed with the intensity of the true believer, the man who will do anything and feel good about it because it's all in the service of a good cause. Even when Norton actually has to use say, "We're the soul eaters," a line that's tough to earn, he delivers it well enough that it offends the ears only a little.
I can't recommend this movie without the reservations I've expressed, but on balance I do recommend it. I'd also definitely go to another Jeremy Renner film in this franchise, but I hope that if Gilroy makes one, he finds some new plot device to drive it.
I entered the theater prepared to love this movie. Over the previous week, we'd watched the three earlier Bourne films in order, and they held up well. The first was the strongest, of course, with the second nearly as good and the third a bit worse, but all were strong films. Damon's consistent performance, a blend of mostly deadpan, machine-like expressions and movements interrupted by moments of passion and action, never let you forget that Jason Bourne was a different, messed-up superagent.
In this reboot of the franchise, Jeremy Renner's Aaron Cross is, fairly enough, a very different person. He's supposed to be an improved version of Bourne, but one with more self-awareness and concerns--neither of which his creators realize he has. In a telling opening sequence, writer/director Tony Gilroy, the man who controlled the previous three films, shows us Renner shirtless and muscular in icy waters in Alaska, so we know he's a tough dude. I don't recall a single shirtless Matt Damon shot in the earlier installments, but that was fine, because the weird, machine-like character Damon portrayed was enough to convince us that he was as badass as the fight scenes made him appear. The opening shot made Renner start out a weaker, more conventional character.
I've read complaints about the plot, but I thought it held up well enough as long as you suspended your disbelief enough to accept the silly science behind this (and the other) films. I had no problem with that. The continuing revelations of layers upon layers of secret government programs was also silly, but it's in the tradition of the earlier films and, hey, who doesn't love a good conspiracy?
I didn't see real any chemistry between Renner and Rachel Weisz, so most of her actions seemed to be largely the product of the plot's needs. Fortunately, the action scenes kept us moving well enough and the actors did good enough jobs that their interactions didn't hurt the film either.
My favorite performance was Edward Norton's, who's always at his best when he's playing a bad guy. Here, he was a very bad guy indeed, but one who thought he was a good guy, and his character brimmed with the intensity of the true believer, the man who will do anything and feel good about it because it's all in the service of a good cause. Even when Norton actually has to use say, "We're the soul eaters," a line that's tough to earn, he delivers it well enough that it offends the ears only a little.
I can't recommend this movie without the reservations I've expressed, but on balance I do recommend it. I'd also definitely go to another Jeremy Renner film in this franchise, but I hope that if Gilroy makes one, he finds some new plot device to drive it.
Published on August 12, 2012 20:15
August 11, 2012
18 Seaboard: Worth a visit
Sarah and Ben weren't due to go on until 9:00 last night, so we had time eat at a local restaurant beforehand. We made the decision late in the week, however, so reservations were scarce on the ground. On a whim, I consulted the 2011 best restaurants list of local food critic Greg Cox, and one of his silver medalists was a place we'd never been. OpenTable and the restaurant were kind, and a few minutes later we were set for dinner at 18 Seaboard.
18 Seaboard opened in 2006, so it is obviously not a new establishment, but because it was new to me, I did the usual basic research. The chef-proprietor, Jason Smith, has an interesting and varied background that includes stints in two serious New York restaurants. He took the time to credit his executive chef, Ty Parker, and pastry chef, Billy Apperson, which I always like to see. The menu sported an appealing mix of tarted-up versions of southern classics and some dishes that sounded more experimental.
I was happy with my choice.
After finishing last night's dinner, I'm glad to be able to report that I'm still happy, though not without reservations.
The restaurant is in an industrial-looking building with high ceilings and brick exterior walls. Inside, though, it's pure big city, with open ceilings, an active bar, and a lot of conversations filling the spaces. I liked it.
The food ranged from good to very good, though no dish stood out as exceptional the way almost every dish at a truly top-drawer place like Panciuto typically does. Two of us shared two starters, the wood-fire grilled fresh bacon and the cheese board. The cheeses were tasty, and the bacon was the highlight of the whole meal, more pork belly than standard bacon. My main was a pork shank with bleu cheese grits, and it was both delicious and enormous; I ate only half the meat and a third of the grits. (Scott was happy to polish off the take-out box for me at home.) The desserts were all good as well, though a day later none stands out in my mind as wonderful.
The service was uneven, with every server who helped us trying too hard but not listening or observing well. I appreciate their intentions, but less effort at speaking and more at paying attention would have helped.
All in all, dinner at 18 Seaboard was a good enough meal that I can recommend the place and will try it again.
18 Seaboard opened in 2006, so it is obviously not a new establishment, but because it was new to me, I did the usual basic research. The chef-proprietor, Jason Smith, has an interesting and varied background that includes stints in two serious New York restaurants. He took the time to credit his executive chef, Ty Parker, and pastry chef, Billy Apperson, which I always like to see. The menu sported an appealing mix of tarted-up versions of southern classics and some dishes that sounded more experimental.
I was happy with my choice.
After finishing last night's dinner, I'm glad to be able to report that I'm still happy, though not without reservations.
The restaurant is in an industrial-looking building with high ceilings and brick exterior walls. Inside, though, it's pure big city, with open ceilings, an active bar, and a lot of conversations filling the spaces. I liked it.
The food ranged from good to very good, though no dish stood out as exceptional the way almost every dish at a truly top-drawer place like Panciuto typically does. Two of us shared two starters, the wood-fire grilled fresh bacon and the cheese board. The cheeses were tasty, and the bacon was the highlight of the whole meal, more pork belly than standard bacon. My main was a pork shank with bleu cheese grits, and it was both delicious and enormous; I ate only half the meat and a third of the grits. (Scott was happy to polish off the take-out box for me at home.) The desserts were all good as well, though a day later none stands out in my mind as wonderful.
The service was uneven, with every server who helped us trying too hard but not listening or observing well. I appreciate their intentions, but less effort at speaking and more at paying attention would have helped.
All in all, dinner at 18 Seaboard was a good enough meal that I can recommend the place and will try it again.
Published on August 11, 2012 20:59
August 10, 2012
The longest I've smiled in ages
As I mentioned in yesterday's entry, earlier tonight we went to see Sarah and Ben, in their guise as The Camaraderie, play at the Deep South Bar in Raleigh. They were the first of four bands and the only one I had the chance to see. (We had to leave not long after their set due to some previously committed and important early-morning obligations.)
I know I'm biased, but still: Their half-hour set was great. I enjoyed every song, they were tight, the mix was well above average for a club, and they made very few missteps. Each time I hear them, they get better.
Seriously, if you live around here, you'd be doing yourself a favor to catch them any time they're playing out.
The club had also done a good job of turning a somewhat run-down space into a neat performance venue by simply painting the walls solid colors and then writing on those walls snippets of band lyrics in mostly bold, white letters.
Sarah came up to me before the set to point out that she would be playing on a stage whose front contained a few lines from one of her favorite bands, The Hold Steady. Check out the writing on the black riser in the lower right of this photo.
As always, click on an image to see a larger version.
The full text may be hard to read, so here it is:
Yeah, I liked the place.
About halfway through the set, as I was listening to the music and watching them play and sing, I realized I had been smiling for some time. The smile stayed on my face for almost the whole time they were on the stage. I realized that seeing my children excel at something they love is a tremendous source of joy for me. Watching Sarah on that stage was simply wonderful.
You may have noticed that I said the smile was on my face for almost the whole set. The only time it wasn't came when they finished the song, "The Ladder," and in rapid order I remembered
I also know for certain that she would have understood exactly how I felt, because even though we couldn't really afford it, she somehow managed to scrape together the funds to take me to see Richard Kiley in the road show of The Man from La Mancha when it came to the Bayfront Center in St. Petersburg when I was a teenager. She and I loved that show, and she gave me a gift that on that night helped define me, that made me always and forever want to be a better man.
Then Sarah and Ben started a new song, my grief retreated to the hole it will probably always occupy in me, and the smile returned to my face.
I know I'm biased, but still: Their half-hour set was great. I enjoyed every song, they were tight, the mix was well above average for a club, and they made very few missteps. Each time I hear them, they get better.
Seriously, if you live around here, you'd be doing yourself a favor to catch them any time they're playing out.
The club had also done a good job of turning a somewhat run-down space into a neat performance venue by simply painting the walls solid colors and then writing on those walls snippets of band lyrics in mostly bold, white letters.
Sarah came up to me before the set to point out that she would be playing on a stage whose front contained a few lines from one of her favorite bands, The Hold Steady. Check out the writing on the black riser in the lower right of this photo.

The full text may be hard to read, so here it is:
and I'm pretty sure we kissedI had to point out to her the Jim Morrison lyrics that you can see in the upper right of this picture.
gonna walk around and drink some more

Yeah, I liked the place.
About halfway through the set, as I was listening to the music and watching them play and sing, I realized I had been smiling for some time. The smile stayed on my face for almost the whole time they were on the stage. I realized that seeing my children excel at something they love is a tremendous source of joy for me. Watching Sarah on that stage was simply wonderful.
You may have noticed that I said the smile was on my face for almost the whole set. The only time it wasn't came when they finished the song, "The Ladder," and in rapid order I remembered
My mother loved that song.My vision turned watery for a moment, and my heart felt slow and heavy, but then I recalled the times Mom got to see Sarah perform in orchestra concerts and in recitals. I reminded myself that Mom loved Sarah and Scott, and she was incredibly proud of them. She missed this show, and I am sad for that, but she saw a lot.
My mother would have loved to see this show.
My mother is dead and never will see Sarah and Ben on stage together.
I also know for certain that she would have understood exactly how I felt, because even though we couldn't really afford it, she somehow managed to scrape together the funds to take me to see Richard Kiley in the road show of The Man from La Mancha when it came to the Bayfront Center in St. Petersburg when I was a teenager. She and I loved that show, and she gave me a gift that on that night helped define me, that made me always and forever want to be a better man.
Then Sarah and Ben started a new song, my grief retreated to the hole it will probably always occupy in me, and the smile returned to my face.
Published on August 10, 2012 20:59