Zzenn Loren's Blog, page 5

World War 3 and the Tragedy of Human Ignorance

As of the date of this article (10/18/23), Israel and Hamas are at war. Iran, backed by China, Russia, North Korea, and Turkey, is about to join forces with Hamas, and the United States has moved a fleet of nuclear-powered battleships to the region. The signs should be obvious even to liberals who declare everything that doesn't fit into their safe space a CONSPIRACY THEORY!!! Warmongers from both political parties are cheering on the Apocalypse while the jacuzzi bubbles in their bunkers are warming up.

We all know where this is going — World War 3.

Unfortunately, an embarrassing majority of humans have not figured out how to get along after centuries of regional, national, and global conflicts. The resources we share as a unified genetic species, characterized by common blood and shared suffering thresholds, are frequently the subject of fierce competition. One would think we lived on separate planets.

Human primates are territorial breeding machines who fight over stupid things such as "whose invisible heavenly Daddy is best." The alpha monkeys at the top of the food chain know this and graciously crown the herd with an enduring term: "Useful Idiots."

The more educated people become, the more skillfully they fight for their irrational convictions. Just watch a Christian scholar defend his ideological territory by arguing for the literal existence of Noah's Ark. Debates such as these are fit for a audience of puppets.

After two world wars, the most delusional of our kind, "religious fanatics," gather worldwide, chanting death to those who do not believe in their invisible deity. Warring factions kill each other, hoping "their tribe" will win the celestial booby prize. And yet, history shows that once a tribe achieves its version of world peace, another fights them over their new and improved version.

It doesn't matter if nuclear war annihilates all parties. The emotionally charged peanut in their head cannot see beyond the dead children in their arms. Humanity is culturally hypnotized, except for a few brave souls with a birds-eye view of the game board. These extraordinary individuals piece together 2 + 2 and strive to communicate to lesser mortals uncomplicated equations like:

War is hell for everyone.Violence begets violence.We are one species.We share one planet's resources.Religious wars never solve anything.Children are affected by our irrational decisions.Nuclear bombs are destructive.Invisible people do not exist.Holy books were written when the Earth was flat.Science and critical thinking are imperative for our survival.

These are just a few building blocks for adult children to play with. However, simple facts bounce off emotionally fueled sapiens like water does boiling oil. Tribalism is the only thing that relieves the tension of the bipedal squad.

At this point, I discern no escape from the impending apocalypse. The global elite understands human ignorance and is banking on the improbable chance that individuals will mature, unite, relinquish belief in authoritarian ghosts, and commit the horrifying sin of critical thinking. For individuals of sound moral character who have cultivated a rational intellect, the fact that humans still confuse their imagination with reality is utterly exasperating. The mythical Jesus said it this way:

"O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you? How long shall I suffer you?"

— Matthew 17:17

There are some reading this article that will be offended by my misanthropic contempt. But allow me to present several examples of human buffoonery that could have been avoided if common sense had been applied:

On September 28, 2022, Hurricane Ian struck Cayo Costa, Florida. This Category 4 storm brought 150 mph winds and a 10-15 foot storm surge, ranking among the strongest hurricanes in Florida's history. The aftermath left residents homeless, wading in waters filled with alligators and poisonous snakes. The governor had issued several warnings days before the event, giving the population plenty of time to drive north and sleep in their vehicles if they had no other option. Instead, many decided to remain in the most dangerous zones every hurricane has decimated over the decades. This resulted in public tantrums, blaming the authorities for not pulling them out of their cribs on time. A similar scenario unfolds in Tornado Alley, where residents rebuild with unwavering faith, trusting that their unseen Heavenly Father will shield them from the devil's wrath, despite the annual evidence of ignored prayers when their children are discovered miles away dangling from a tree.Another illustration can be found in inner cities, where residents plunder their communities' stores. Logic would imply that robbing the very establishments from which they purchase essential goods would inevitably lead to their closure, given the loss of income. Surprisingly, those who steal cannot enjoy the loot over a cold beer because the store is, well, — EMPTY?

Emotionally charged human animals don't "think" beyond the moment. It's like shooting yourself in the foot while pointing at your enemy, saying, "Take That!"

One of my favorite examples of human buffoonery is in the airline industry. Barely a week goes by that I don't read a story of someone having a tantrum on a flight over the most childish things. A common example is the refusal to leave the plane after having a tantrum over a seating arrangement. This person is told that everyone will have to exit the plane if they don't leave. And, of course, they rather piss off hundreds of passengers than simply walk off the plane and work things out with the airlines. You'd think they would grow an intellect and apologize for acting like an infant. But time after time, resistance to the horrifying feeling of being wrong, no matter the cost, is displayed in living color. Public humiliation is taken as a badge of honor for these inverted minds.

The system has failed us. Generational trauma and cultural brainwashing have spawned a zombie apocalypse.

Unfortunately, we are in for a ride. George Bush's New World Order (also being parroted by China and Russia) aims to create a global order out of catastrophic chaos.

WALL STREET JOURNAL: In Beijing, Xi and Putin Double Down on Path to New World Order.

Each world war has resulted in a global arrangement for the international elite. After World War 1, the League of Nations was created. After World War 2, the United Nations. And now, we are witnessing the rumblings of Armageddon for the New World Order.

This present window of opportunity, during which a truly peaceful and interdependent world order might be built, will not be open for too long - We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.

— David Rockefeller

I wish I had a magic wand to slap humanity out of the dumb-dumb trance, but I see no hope for the situation. Critical thinking and reason would need to spread like a religion complete with churches and temples with a huge invisible brain for all to worship. The minority of humans that exhibit rationality and sensibility are not enough to stop the planet of the apes from destroying itself.

Who knows, maybe Jesus will return on his white horse and shoot laser beams out of his eyes, disintegrating sinners and levitating rational people to outer space in a celestial suit. Or, aliens will materialize their ships over the world's major cities and corral the human herd into smart cities for entertainment. Artificial intelligence will likely emerge as a savior, and transhumanism will be the new religion. Call it an upgrade for the cultural zoo.

For those adventurous souls who have spent time on Earth deconstructing their egos, nuclear war is a welcomed exit into paradise. And for the nihilists, a confirmation of their meaningless existence. Both will bask in delight as the radiation melts their faces off in a finale of self-affirming insanity.

If the testimonies of near-death experiences are true, we have only to focus on a transition from the material world into a realm of love and oneness. As crazy as that may sound, it is more appealing than the 'illusion of separation' humans fight over when they're bored.

— Zzenn

Why Atheism and Religion Will Not Make You Smarter

 

"People who are right a lot listen a lot, and they change their mind a lot . . . They wake up and reanalyze things and change their mind. If you don't change your mind frequently, you're going to be wrong a lot."  — Jeff Bezos

Having traversed the path from Christianity to a fusion of Jungian Psychology and body-centered therapy, when I became an Atheist in 2012 (one who doesn't believe in anthropomorphic Gods) I did not discard spirituality entirely. I exposed metaphysical claims, particularly substance dualism, and became a student of the scientific method and the pitfalls of pseudo-science. What I came to realize is that maintaining an open mind is paramount; otherwise, one risks descending into emotional reactivity, morphing into a pseudo-intellectual or a divine narcissist, regardless of how vigorously one signals their intellectual prowess.

I have found that unless you work out your psychology, you do not raise your level of mental competence. Instead, your lack of emotional intelligence clouds your judgment and diminishes your expertise. You are at the mercy of your psychological shadow as it transmigrates from religion to atheism, and atheism to intellectualism. You are infected with your unconscious, no matter how much you learn or what club you join.

A fool is made more of a fool when their mouth is more open than their mind.

― Anthony Liccione

Knowledge alone does not change the toxic reactions of atheists any more than the faithful. In fact, the more one immerses themselves in their religion or science-based skepticism, the more closed-minded they may become. An emotionally toxic individual will channel their psychological shadow through whatever lens they see the world through. It is easy to study but much harder to do the inner work of self-awareness.

The Blind Side of Smartness

One might assume that our sharp minds would be the guardians of rationality, impervious to the allure of irrational debates and the spectacle of psychological projection. But reality shakes the feeling of certainty and the addiction to self-aggrandizement.

Here are some factors in this cognitive circus:

Cognitive Biases:

Confirmation bias tempts us to passionately seek validation for our cherished beliefs and gleefully dismiss any intruders challenging our intellectual kingdom. Whether it's the pious Christian ignoring threatening evidence or the unwavering atheist clinging to authority, both thirst for the shot glass of affirmation. To navigate this treacherous terrain, we must first acknowledge our biases, explore diverse perspectives, consider contrary evidence, and, oh yes, remain open to the disturbing concept of changing our minds.

Emotional Bonds:

And then you have the passionate zealots, whether they kneel before deities or the altar of scientific certainty. Emotions, like the siren's song, lead them astray from the shores of reason. Believers clutch their faith when confronted with Noah's call to all the animals in the world to pair up and suspend their predatory instincts Atheists, on the other hand, cozy up to the allure of scientific dogma and posture as existential experts with a condescending attitude. The prescription here? Cultivate awareness of your emotional puppeteers, evaluate evidence like a discerning art collector, and be prepared to welcome new truths into your abode of beliefs.

“People who, as children, were intellectually far beyond their parents and therefore admired by them, but who also therefore had to solve their own problems alone. These people, who give us a feeling of their intellectual strength and will power, also seem to demand that we, too, ought to fight off any feeling of weakness with intellectual means. In their presence one feels one cannot be recognized as a person with problems just as they and their problems were unrecognized by their parents, for whom he always had to be strong.”

― Alice Miller

Social Currents:

Ah, the primate herd mentality that sweeps even the mightiest intellects off their feet! Driven by an insatiable craving for groupthink, atheists seek agreement in the cyber realms of online groups while Christians gather in the mental lab of the church. The key to maintaining sanity is acknowledging your predispositions, seeking wisdom from diverse fountains, scrutinizing every piece of evidence as if your life depended on it, and, of course, keeping your mind flexible enough to do a mental limbo dance under the bar of changing convictions.

The religious person has a valid excuse for their stupidity. On the other hand, atheists and skeptics are held to a higher standard due to their orthodox liberation. They fall prey to a more pronounced stupidity when they fail to reason through blind contempt. They violate the principles of critical thinking. 

Their hypocrisy proves the religious edict:

"Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye." — Matthew 7:5

— Zzenn

Complexity and Uncertainty:

Unconventional beliefs beckon even the most discerning minds into their convoluted embrace. Conspiracies and pseudoscience become the playgrounds of those who believe they have unlocked the secrets of the universe. The solution? Embrace the fact that intellect is a delicate flower that can wither in the presence of beguiling complexity.

Information Overload:

In this epoch of limitless information, even self-proclaimed geniuses can drown in the roaring sea of data and disinformation. Threatened believers 'double down on dumb' succumbing to declarations of buffoonery and soul threats while unbelievers preach untested media facts promoted by political scientists. Remedy? Recognize the seductive pull of information overload and navigate these perilous waters with caution.

To illuminate the path toward enlightenment, intelligence must be coupled with an unwavering commitment to self-realization minus the irrational association with New Age Woo and science turned into dogma.

Blinded By The Past

Let's start with the faith fanatics. They've built a cozy fort of belief to hide from life's thunderstorms. Beneath the blankets of devotion, there's a potential for cognitive confusion. Why bother with introspection when you can have beliefs that come with an "I'm right, you're wrong" package deal? Emotional intelligence? Who needs that when you are under mind control? Who cares about personal growth when you can just hug your faith like a teddy bear?

"In order to become whole we must try, in a long process, to discover our own personal truth, a truth that may cause pain before giving us a new sphere of freedom. If we choose instead to content ourselves with intellectual “wisdom,” we will remain in the sphere of illusion and self-deception."

― Alice Miller

Now, onto the atheist all-stars, the folks with reason on speed dial! From their castles of skepticism, they release their ad hominem guards. Rejecting religion might be their way of saying, "I'm over it," to hereditary religion. Their atheism, sprinkled with reason, might also come with a side dish of leftover resentment towards Sunday school and the religious mother they never bonded with. Unexamined emotional baggage, anyone? It's the perfect recipe for cloudy judgment and a diploma in grudge-holding. The deeper the unowened pain. the more difficult it is

In a surprise twist, both believers and atheists are stuck in a paradox! Their convictions are like the magician's cape, hiding their unexamined histories. Who needs emotional intelligence when you've got beliefs to cling to. But here's the kicker, brave souls – those who dare to dig into self-discovery and healing might just find a treasure map to sanity. Remember, the essence of an awakened mind isn't just what it knows, but how it knows. Shine your emotional intelligence like a disco ball, and may it out-glitter the shadows of your past – cue the funky dance moves! 

The Feeling of Being Certain

Our existence is like a never-ending soap opera where our primitive survival instincts trap us in the Serengeti of endless arguments. Allow me to introduce you to the star of the show: overconfidence, a relic from our evolutionary past that just won't quit, no matter how desperately we posture with false humility.

Consider the world of our ancestors where life and death hung in the balance, and certainty was the ticket to survival. That rustling bush could be a hungry predator ready to pounce on a sumptuous sapiens. Thus, "feeling certain" spawned, favoring irrational arguments.

In today's world, the consequences of this evolutionary legacy are on full display:

In Relationships: A lover is armed with the unwavering belief that they're always right, engaging in an endless battle of wills with their partner. The symphony of discord turns into a death metal mosh pit.In the Age of Social Media: Google-confidence is the fuel that powers the misinformation machine. We lap up whatever aligns with our beliefs while swatting away inconvenient facts like pesky flies.In Decision-Making: Rational judgment? Who needs that when you can trust your gut, right? And so, instead of questioning our intuitions, we dive headfirst into irrational beliefs (invisible people) and virtue signally intellectuals.In Cognitive Wonderland: The convert politely declines any invitation to open-mindedness. Critical thinking? Not at this table, dear sir! Contradictory evidence? Banished from sight!In the Realm of Self-Deception: Overconfidence isn't satisfied with just messing up our relationships and decisions; it also helps us build a delightful cocoon of self-delusion. We're all just a tad better than we really are, and that's okay!

To tame this overconfident beast, we must first acknowledge its roots in our ancestral baggage. Armed with this knowledge, we can embark on the epic quest of mitigation: By nurturing critical thinking skills, we can wield the sword of skepticism and question our own certainties. By encouraging open dialogue, we may just break the spell of echo chambers and let fresh ideas flow. By embracing the radical notion that we can change our beliefs when faced with new evidence, we'll finally have a fighting chance against the relentless pull of our primitive past.

Conclusion

The predilection for unwarranted certainty, which often leads us to avoid the feeling of being wrong, is an evolutionary gift from our ancestors and a hangover from our childhood impressions. While this bias serves us in a perilous world, it can taint our debating prowess, decision-making, cognitive thought, and self-perception. Acknowledging this cognitive quirk is paramount as we strive for a more open-minded and rational existence in an increasingly intricate and interconnected world.

The next time you argue for or against atheism or religion, I recommend taking a pause and asking yourself if you want to sincerely know the truth or defend your position. The former is sincerely curious, and the latter a pitiful display of pretentiousness.

I shall end with the quote at the beginning of this article:

"People who are right a lot listen a lot, and they change their mind a lot . . . They wake up and reanalyze things and change their mind. If you don't change your mind frequently, you're going to be wrong a lot."

— Jeff Bezos

— Zzenn

Anti-natalism and the Horrors of Existence: Is Life Worth Living?

"Madness, mayhem, erotic vandalism, devastation of innumerable souls - while we scream and perish, History licks a finger and turns the page."

― Thomas Ligotti

Since 2012 I have written about the pitfalls of spirituality and how to live an authentic spiritual life. As the years passed, I gradually surrendered to the hard realities of life. Oh yes, I fought the raging battle between my dreams and disappointments and reached a point where it was time to take the gloves off and stop tiptoeing around the truth.

It's time for some bare-knuckle writing.

I won't write a script on "everyone's truth" to cushion the adult children in the room. I'm talking about 'the brutal truth' after the dream bubble pops and the snowflakes leave the room. The most overlooked reality-check topic is childbirth. Allow me to indulge.

The Horror of Birth

Humans are born screaming and crying. That alone should tell you something. They live in a womb for nine months, subject to the conditions around the mother. If the mother is in an abusive relationship, on drugs, has a poor diet, or listens to entertainment that drives chills down the backs of sentient mammals, such as death metal, horror films, or action movies filled with gun violence and the sounds of dying actors, scientific studies have shown this affects the development of the fetus.

Eventually, they squeeze out of the birth canal with the sound of their mother screaming in pain as the doctor (who is a stranger) pulls them away from the womb, cuts their umbilical cord (that lifeline that has kept them alive for nine months), swings them over to a table, wipes off the placenta goo, and in some cases, cuts the foreskin off the genital (which is very painful).

After the sanitizing ordeal, the mother's warm embrace rewards the infant, who suckles her teets. One can only wonder if children feel guilty for being born. Just think of the pain and sacrifice their existence has imposed upon an innocent human being right from the start. Could this be the birth of the psychological shadow?

If it is true that spiritual beings choose to come to classroom earth, shouldn't there be an entrance fee or reparations for the mother? Why would a loving spiritual being kick off its earthly visit by causing incredible pain to another? What's altruistic about that? Did Jesus apologize to Mary? Did Gandhi blurt a "Namaste" on the way out? One can only wonder why a returning Buddha wouldn't deploy a 'cosmic numbing agent' to the ill-recognized Goddess.

But consider that this birth scenario is the exception. What about inner-city children who spend their first nine months in drug-infested, crime-ridden environments? Those unlucky souls born addicted to fentanyl, wheeled into a recovery room without a suckle, sent to an orphanage, abandoned on the side of the road, or given to sex trafficking rings?

The Blind Leading the Blind

I went into Walmart the other day and was, as always, haunted by children captive to toxic parents. The sadness in their eyes was evident as they were publicly scolded for wanting a candy bar and commanded to stay still in the shopping cart. They were treated with no rights and no autonomy. Their job was to obey their masters. It was truly heart-wrenching to witness.

Instances like this erode my faith in humanity. In a society captivated by entertainment, a staggering $150 billion human trafficking industry thrives while people walk around with 'cuckoo clocks' above their heads — and they wonder why the world is a mess until their child gets kidnapped. They buffer their consciousness from the horror by attending the next church service, baseball game, or concert, with an occasional petty donation for a children's cancer hospital at a Safeway checkout.

Another example that makes me embarrassed to be human is on social media. I recently posted a Facebook ad for my book which is a biography of my journey from generational child abuse to spiritual healing. Close to half of the replies were people mocking, and laughing, and some were mad that I posted the ad. On YouTube, the reactions to my video biography are the same with armchair morons dumping their nasty minds all over the comment thread like a bunch of drunk apes. I become more grateful for the trickles of appreciation I get.

The Human Animal

Humans are emotional primates, susceptible to trance, storytelling, hypnosis, and hallucinations. They are inherently inclined to obey authority, adhere to societal norms, project their insecurities onto others, exhibit territorial behaviors, are generally stupid, and occasionally indulge in tendencies reminiscent of the darkest of inclinations, such as masochism and sadism.

However, akin to other mammals, humans possess the capacity for playfulness, wonder, friendliness, companionship, care, generosity, genius, and, in the most exemplary instances, a willingness to selflessly sacrifice for the greater good. Don't get me wrong, when humans are good, they are good. But when they are bad, they destroy their reputation.

Angels and Devils are nothing more than human projections. Thus, with disproportionate self-images, they believe the universe revolves around them while they strut in their hamster cage waiting for the next upgrade (extended tunnel, sqeeky toys, extra water container etc).

Could Humans Change?

Would human behavior improve if the "survival of the fittest" meme was balanced with love and cooperation? Are the devils of our nature fed by nefarious influences?

According to David Loye, an internationally known psychologist and evolutionary systems scientist, evolution extends beyond the survival of the fittest. He published several books on Darwin's less-known writings on love and cooperation in the context of evolution. These writings by Darwin have been excluded from the official narrative which should raise some social engineering flags (hand me a tin foil hat over a blindfold, thank you very much). If "survival of the fittest" is the dominant interpretation of evolution, how can we expect a society to feed the better angels of their nature?

For further insights, I highly recommend exploring David Loye's books.

Darwin's Lost Theory of Love

Contrary to the prevailing notions of selfishness and survival of the fittest, this theory places love, sex, and moral sensitivity at the forefront of our understanding of evolution.

Darwin's Lost Theory 

Page after page of Darwin’s own original writing, Darwin makes the case for the primacy of love, moral sensitivity, mutual aid, and education as higher order drivers for human evolution.

The Delusion Buffer

Humans are most vulnerable to their hopes and dreams. They create illusions to buffer their consciousness from death, sickness, loss, heartbreak, poverty, crime, drug abuse, unfairness, injustice, threats, intimidation, humiliation, and macro topics such as nuclear war, famine, child sex trafficking, genocide, infanticide, pandemics, disasters and, well, use your imagination.

But wait a minute. Aren't you overlooking the good in between all of the bad Zzenn? Sure, but the fact remains that humans spend much of their time spinning happy plates to get through life. This blog is a reading exercise for thrill-seeking info-surfers. The kind who stop and watch car accidents. The bravest of minds who delve into the underbelly of reality.

Let us not forget that the universe grows puppies and flowers. It creates eyes for beautiful sunsets. It evolves organisms for love and companionship. It gives humans sensual experiences and grows an inner realm of beauty, healing, and bliss. The universe could also be likened to a monster that destroys its own creations.

God's Unforgivable Sin

When I look through the corridors of time, there's one topic that destroys the idea of a loving God and the value of the human experience — the suffering of children. The history of which can never be reversed. It can never be remedied even with some form of mind-erasing magic. The crime has been committed and the trauma runs deep in humanity's ancestral memory. Much worse is our species hasn't learned the lessons from the past and child abuse continues to flourish. The child sex trafficking industry is somewhere in the ballpark of a 150 billion-dollar industry.

All life is suffering.

— The Buddha

A metaphysical mind would argue that we are "spiritual beings" from another dimension experiencing the woes of 3D earth life for learning. But that doesn't change the consciousness of the child's suffering in that form. The sentient "being" suffered horribly. Some may call it a dream, but if it's a dream, it is a horrifying painful dream that no self-aware creature in the universe should ever experience.

Is Human Biology a Tunnel to Another Dimension?

Why would anyone want to bring a child into a world of suffering? Why would the portal of birth be opened for innocent beings to be subject to kidnapping, war, rape, child abuse, environmental disasters, school shootings, and death anxiety? Is earth life a tomb for birth into another realm? A dangerous journey for souls to navigate to a fantastical dimension where they are no longer limited to the prison of space and time?

" To the occultist, birth is death, and death is an awakening. The mystics of ancient days taught that to be born into the physical world was to enter a tomb, for no other plane of nature is so unresponsive, so limited as the earth-world. Time and distance were prison bars chaining the soul to narrow environments. Heat and cold tormented the soul, age deprived it of its faculties, and man’s life was but a preparation for death. "

― Manly P. Hall

Is it possible that conscious balls of energy must travel through human organisms to grow into a form for existence in another dimension? Is the body a cocoon that gives birth to a winged creature through the Kundalini experience? Ha, how's that for imagination?

Or . . .

Is life a wasteland of blind mutations that give organisms a brief window of consciousness until they black out into oblivion? I cannot say that is so terrible as long as I'm not aware after my personal extinction. The last time I went under anesthesia I was "not there" during the operation so my existence didn't technically matter. There was no pain or medical conversations to decipher.

The Near Death Experience

Skeptics I have run into on social media claim to "know" there is no afterlife. In a recent debate, I argued that you cannot know there's no afterlife any more than you can be certain of one. The atheist rebutted stating the current findings in neuroscience prove NDE's (near-death experiences) are brain hallucinations.

I explained that I agreed with the findings and quoted neuroscientists such as Sam Harris, Susan Blackmore, V. S. Ramachandran, and physicist Victor Stenger. However, I clarified that they have not come to empirical conclusions and that NDEs are not fully explained. I noted that people who experience an afterlife dimension describe a realm so far beyond the human experience that our earth life pales in comparison. The dilemma I find is how does a brain that is barely functioning, produce an experience far beyond its normal activity?

Below, you'll find a selection of NDE (Near-Death Experience) testimonies sourced from nderf.org. It's important to acknowledge that these accounts are challenging to interpret due to the commonalities and variations they exhibit. NDE events often share similarities in their descriptions of the environment (such as a tunnel of light, unfamiliar colors, encounters with entities, and a sense that earthly life pales in comparison). However, the actual experiences can differ significantly based on individuals' beliefs, though this is not always the case. Delving deeper into this topic warrants a dedicated article, but for context, here are a few of these testimonies:

Kevin L NDE 3/20/2022. NDE 9362. Exceptional Experience, from Canada I was transported to the event horizon or beyond of a black hole. Could I do this if I was alive? The answer, I believe is 'No'. The power of a black hole is needed for a soul to travel from one universe to another.Al H NDE-like 12/25/2021. NDE-like 9322. Exceptional Experience. The life story of every single tree I can see(thousands), the landscape and city that existed previously, colors and shapes that do not exist here.Wooter VA Probable NDE 9/24/2023. Probable NDE 9697. From the Netherlands I was in a field where the sky was purple, the birds sang beautiful songs to me, and there were beautiful trees.A remarkable NDE appears to have occurred during surgery at a time when his brain was completely drained of blood and filled with cryogenic fluid. “My brain was frozen for 100 minutes.”
Scott W NDE 11/11/2019. NDE 8914. Exceptional NDE I then left the earthly realm and entered into an alternate reality. I saw a lagoon that was surrounded by beautiful plants. Everything was soft to the touch. There were 4 or 5 entities who were present, but I could not see them. They assured me that everything would be all right and that I could leave anytime I wanted. They told me that this place was for me and it contained all the Unconditional Love I had for others and that they had for me.The point I am making is that these experiences may be nothing more than brain hallucinations. But the jury is not out on this phenomenon, and skeptics believe "what they want to be true" rather than keeping an open mind. Just because these experiences reflect subjective beliefs (Jesus, Buddha, entities of light, hellish realms, etc.), doesn't rule out the possibility of a different set of rules in another dimension, one that reflects our convictions. The universe is a big place. To write these experiences off when the brain is practically dead is lazy biased thinking.

The Rain Falls on the Just and UnjustThe profound unfairness of life should lead anyone to question the existence of divine parental figures in the heavens. I recently watched a news report about a devastating 7.8 magnitude earthquake that struck southeast Turkey, claiming the lives of thousands. As survivors worked tirelessly to rescue their loved ones from the rubble, their cries of sorrow included the phrase, "It is God's will."

Logic would dictate that to declare it was God's Will to destroy your village and kill your family is an absurdity. Why would anyone's God hurt them and require them to be thankful for his abuse? As the late great Christopher Hitchens said:

“[Heaven is a] place of endless praise and adoration, limitless abnegation and abjection of self; a celestial North Korea.” 

Moreover, one encounters news stories of unfortunate events befalling virtuous individuals in the most heartbreaking of situations such as a bride tragically losing her life in a car accident en route to her wedding. A quick Google search for wedding tragedies yields numerous instances. Conversely, criminals thrive in illicit activities such as drug trafficking and human exploitation with a malevolent synchronicity. And yet, Christians blame the sinner for God's petulant absence.

Regardless of how one dissects the human spectacle, the presence of injustice underscores the impartiality of nature, as alluded to in biblical teachings:

That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.

— Matthew 5:45

For there is no respect of persons with God.

— Romans 2:11

AntinatalismAntinatalism is a philosophical position that argues against bringing new human beings into existence. Antinatalists contend that it is wrong or unethical to have children due to various reasons, including:
Suffering and Pain: Antinatalists often argue that life inherently involves suffering, pain, and hardship. They believe that bringing new people into the world exposes them to inevitable suffering, and it is therefore morally wrong to subject potential individuals to this suffering.Overpopulation and Environmental Concerns: Some antinatalists argue that the Earth is already overpopulated, and further human reproduction exacerbates environmental problems such as resource depletion, climate change, and habitat destruction. There is the argument that there is plenty of room on the earth for a growing humanity but what about the chickens, cows, and pigs who must feed the sapien herd? Go to the Animal Kill Clock website to discover the billions of creatures it takes to feed 8 billion of us annually. Humans, to these animals, must be horrifying flesh-eating aliens. As of the writing of this article (9/27/2023), the total of animals slaughtered for human consumption is 40,934,456,892 for the UNITED STATES ALONE!!!Lack of Consent: Antinatalists maintain that individuals cannot give informed consent to be born, as they do not exist prior to their birth. Who wants to be born into a starving African family, a mother addicted to fentanyl, or a genetically deformed birth? Anyone who tells you they chose to come to earth for the experience should be slapped silly. It's easy to say something like that if you haven't been raped, tortured, born deformed, or mind controlled in an underground lab.Ethical Considerations: Antinatalists often cite ethical considerations, such as the potential for harm or suffering that individuals may experience in their lives, as a reason to abstain from procreation.ConclusionI confess my nihilistic exploitation, but I think humans should shit or get off the pot, in other words — stop having children!
Starve the predators at the top of the food chain and let the species fizzle out. Other options are to alter our DNA with CRISPR gene editing or resort back to a religion that threatens us with eternal damnation. Who knows? A Star Trek civilization may grow out of this global chaos and we will collectively look back wiping the sweat off our brows.

Unfortunately, I know child trafficking will continue alongside Cruise Ship vacations until the nuclear bombs start dropping and everyone gets microchipped.

I hope this made you think . . . and I hope I'm wrong.

— Zzenn

Debunking 'Might Is Right': The Unscientific Doctrine of Power

In this arid wilderness of steel and stone, I raise up my voice that you may hear. To the East and to the West I beckon. To the North and to the South I show a sign — Proclaiming, “Death to the weakling, wealth to the strong.” Open your eyes that you may hear, O! men of mildewed minds and listen to me, ye laborious millions!— Might is Right by Ragnar Redbeard

I've perpetually felt drawn to forbidden literature and controversial subjects. The darker the tome, the greater my intrigue. The more daring the topic, the more literary sportsmanship is aroused.

In the annals of provocative literature, few texts evoke the same reaction as Ragnar Redbeard's "Might Is Right." Published in the late 19th century, this contentious book evokes the interests of power-hungry individuals, plagued by their naughty urges, who are searching for meaning.

However, "Might Is Right" is fraught with moral and intellectual pitfalls that crumble under the weight of scientific scrutiny. It's not a philosophy for those who value critical thinking and reason. But it does fill a void for conspiracy buffs seeking the "dirty little secret" under the hood of civil society.

Despite the indulgent stereotype, this 'brutal tome' promotes a machiavellian mindset, and in a scientific society, one must avoid critical analysis to swallow such garbage. It is better to read Richard Dawkins's book "The Selfish Gene" than to fall under an ancient spell and banish your friends for lacking the dexterity of a self-inflated warlord.

Sapiens Need Laws and Enforcement

Redbeard's work gleefully consigns conventional morality to the rubbish bin, asserting that compassion, empathy, and altruism are nothing more than "slaveries of the mind." In this moral vacuum, the doctrine posits that those who possess power are justified in exploiting and oppressing the powerless. Yet, the very bedrock of human society is built upon principles of fairness, cooperation, and empathy.

However, I would be amiss if I denied the influence of "might and power" in the affairs of humankind. Government authorities, religion, laws, and enforcement have always been necessary to keep the human predator civilized, or we end up with a zombie apocalypse.

The beast of Revelations (666) represents humankind and the metaphorical rulebook of the Bible, its whip. Jails and prisons cage the human primate, preventing violence in the cultural zoo. Religion tames the sinful instincts for power. Jesus becomes the projection of ethics and morality, and Satan grants the delusion that humans aren't predatory beasts who love bloody prime ribs and revenge thrillers.

Angry and Dumb

The 'Might is Right' ideology attracts people who lack power and validation in their lives. One must be blind not to recognize the sardonic laughter echoing down its chapters from a Satanic Overlord. The book appeals to people who are looking to validate their contempt for existence and right the wrongs of society.

But you'll have to dig a little deeper than joining the Church of Satan with a grimace on your face, intimidating others with your petulant revenge. Hesitantly, I relinquish my gross stereotype. Plenty of intelligent Sigmas have discovered its outdated, savage content.

Contradictions in Human Evolution

One of the fundamental contradictions within "Might Is Right" lies in its purported connection to the Darwinian concept of survival of the fittest. Redbeard contends that nature is a ruthless arena where the strong dominate the weak. However, this simplistic interpretation ignores the complexities of evolutionary biology. Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection encompasses more than mere brute force. Cooperation, mutualism, and social behaviors have played pivotal roles in the survival of countless species.

Take, for example, the intricate cooperation among bees in a hive. Worker bees selflessly labor to support the colony, ensuring the survival and propagation of their genes. This form of cooperation, in stark contrast to the "might is right" mantra, demonstrates that nature also values selflessness and collaboration.

Selfishness is a Virtue

But let's not overlook the apparent self-interest in all altruistic endeavors. Altruism appears selfless, but at its core, it is calculated. By extending a hand, one can accrue social capital, enhance reputation, secure future assistance, and win the ultimate celestial prize, all serving one's self-interest in the intricate web of human and divine participation.

Mother Teresa, for example, fulfilled "her" destiny, "her" beliefs, and "her" values by giving to the poor, ensuring entrance into the members-only "paradise party" where she could experience eternal pleasure. And no one knows if sexual fantasies accompanied her celestial dreams in light of sacrificial celibacy. If so, due to the suppression of such urges, it would be quite the motivator.

The Empathy Enigma

Redbeard's doctrine dismisses empathy as a weakness. But, as science has shown, empathy is a fundamental trait that has been hardwired into human beings through evolution. Our capacity to understand and share the feelings of others has played a pivotal role in our survival and progress as a species.

I highly recommend Darwin's lesser-known, likely suppressed writings on love:

Darwin's Lost Theory of Love

Contrary to the prevailing notions of selfishness and survival of the fittest, this theory places love, sex, and moral sensitivity at the forefront of our understanding of evolution.

Darwin's Lost Theory 

Page after page of Darwin’s own original writing, Darwin makes the case for the primacy of love, moral sensitivity, mutual aid, and education as higher order drivers for human evolution.

Recent neuroscience research has elucidated the mechanisms behind empathy. Studies have revealed that when we witness someone else's pain or joy, our brains activate regions associated with our own experiences of pain or joy. This neural overlap underscores the deeply ingrained nature of empathy in the human psyche, challenging the idea that it is a mere "enslavement of the mind."

Societal Stability

The fallacy inherent in this 'Might Is Right' doctrine lies in its wanton disregard for the profound significance of societal equilibrium. Redbeard's fanciful vision, where the muscular few subject the weaker masses to their ruthless dominion, conspicuously omits an essential truth. Namely, that the bedrock of prosperous civilizations is woven from the threads of justice, collaboration, and compassion.

Throughout the annals of history, we observe that societies that embrace principles of equity and empathy flourish, while those steeped in the quagmire of oppression and autocracy invariably crumble into the dustbin of time. 

Although I will admit to the argument that civil society may be nothing more than an engineered front for the "Secret Chiefs" behind the veil of history.

And just as the American Dream lulls entertainment addicts to sleep, democracy may be a contrivance of the 'Illumined Ones' who are pulling the strings.

I implore the reader not to underestimate the predatory nature of this dimension nor dismiss the most daunting of conspiracy theories. — humanity as a food source for . . . well, I'll leave that to your imagination.

The Downside of DemocracyDemocracy definitely has its pitfalls. It grapples with election manipulation, political apathy, the rise of populism, and the undue influence of wealth. The tyranny of the majority can neglect minority rights, and gridlock hinders progress. Misinformation corrodes discourse, and it often falls short on complex global issues. 

Election Manipulation: Some democracies suffer from manipulation, fraud, and voter suppression, eroding the democratic foundation.Political Apathy: Many citizens remain politically disengaged, leading to low turnout and extremist influences in elections.Populism: Populist leaders exploit public sentiment, sowing division and oversimplifying complex issues.Short-Termism: Elected officials prioritize short-term gains over long-term problems like climate change.Minority Rights: Majority rule can marginalize minority groups, challenging democratic ideals.Gridlock: Multi-branch systems can lead to political gridlock, hampering progress.Money in Politics: Wealthy interests wield disproportionate influence, jeopardizing equal representation.Representational Shortcomings: Some systems misrepresent the popular vote, skewing results.Media Manipulation: Misinformation and "fake news" impact public opinion and elections.Complex Issue Handling: Democracies struggle with global issues requiring long-term planning and international cooperation.To sum it up, human sapiens are susceptible to their cousins' behaviors — bonobo and rhesus monkeys (as observed on social media) no matter how you slice and dice the hairless ape. But let us not forget democracy's brilliance lies in its ability to self-correct through elections, the rule of law, and an independent judiciary. However, its undeniable failures should fuel our commitment to perfect it. Whether our species can do that under the looming threat of nuclear annihilation in 2023 is the optimist's hope and the pessimist's doubt.

I have little faith that "Might" will fail in the quest for global domination by the rulers of terra firma. Their weapons and AI technology are too advanced for the torch carrying herd.

Might is Scientifically Wrong"Might Is Right" boldly asserts that power is the supreme arbiter of right and that dominance is the ultimate virtue. Yet, as we shine the spotlight of reason and empirical evidence upon this contentious doctrine, it becomes evident that the very foundations of "Might Is Right" crumble under scrutiny.Altruism in Evolutionary Biology: In the grand tapestry of existence, nature often surprises us with instances of altruism that defy the dogma of "Might Is Right." Vampire bats, for instance, willingly share their blood with group members who've had an unfortunate night hunting. This selflessness guarantees the collective's survival, a stark counterpoint to the belief that nature is merely a stage for ruthless competition.Cooperation in Multi-Agent Systems: Even in the realm of artificial intelligence, cooperation prevails over brute dominance. Algorithms designed for autonomous agents consistently demonstrate that collaboration and resource-sharing yield superior outcomes. It's a lesson lost on those who extol "Might Is Right."Empathy in Neurobiology: Neuroscientific findings consistently showcase the prevalence of empathy in human beings. When individuals witness the joy or agony of others, their brains resonate with these experiences. This neural response challenges the assertion that empathy is a mere "enslavement of the mind," revealing it as a fundamental aspect of human nature.Reciprocity in Social Sciences: Across various social sciences, the principle of reciprocity counters the "might is right" doctrine. Reciprocity involves exchanging favors or benefits, a practice present in societies that reward cooperative behavior and punish exploitation. This underscores fairness and cooperation, rejecting the notion of unbridled dominance.Kin Selection in Evolution: In the intricate tale of evolution, kin selection emerges as a compelling argument against "Might Is Right." This theory elucidates how altruistic behaviors can evolve when they benefit close relatives who share an individual's genes. It highlights the significance of genetic preservation and cooperation.Cooperation in Multi-Agent Systems: The realm of artificial intelligence showcases the superiority of cooperation over brute force. Algorithms for autonomous agents consistently prove that collaboration and resource-sharing lead to more favorable outcomes than solitary dominance.Social Insects and Eusocial Behavior: In the intricate tapestry of the natural world, social insects such as ants, bees, and termites unfurl the banner of highly cooperative and eusocial behavior. These creatures craft elaborate colonies with specialized roles, diligently working together for the survival and propagation of the entire community.Reciprocal Altruism in Primates: The spotlight falls on reciprocal altruism, a captivating phenomenon within the primate realm. Species such as chimpanzees and bonobos showcase cooperative behaviors like food sharing and grooming, underpinned by the expectation of future reciprocation.The Tragedy of the Commons: Economics and environmental science provide a cautionary tale known as the Tragedy of the Commons, underscoring that unchecked individualism can spell doom for shared resources. It emphasizes the imperative of cooperation and collective action, directly contradicting the creed that dominance should reign supreme.Cooperation in Social Psychology: Social psychology consistently demonstrates that cooperation is fundamental to human behavior. Studies on social dilemmas and group dynamics reveal that individuals often opt for cooperative strategies, leading to mutually beneficial outcomes.Epigenetic Factors in Gene Expression: The domain of epigenetics reveals the profound impact of external factors on gene expression. Environmental variables, life experiences, and social interactions carve their mark on an individual's genetic expression, revealing the intricate interplay between nature and nurture. This rebuffs the notion that genetics alone dictate an individual's destiny, painting a richer, more complex portrait of human existence.The Inferiority of the Church of Satan

Heavy on rhetoric, this provocative book laid a foundation for LaVeyan's Satanism. LaVey, himself a master of dramatic flair, used the book's unscientific, polemical nature to construct a philosophy centered around personal empowerment, individualism, and the rejection of traditional moral values.

The current High Priest of the Church of Satan, Peter H. Gilmore, has made a name for himself as a vocal advocate for the Machiavelli bible "Might Is Right.". While he aligns himself with this philosophy, Gilmore's political stances and actions often contradict the very principles he claims to uphold.

Championing "Might Is Right"

Gilmore has consistently praised "Might Is Right" as a foundational text for the Church of Satan. He sees it as an embodiment of the ethos of radical individualism, where the strong and assertive should reign supreme, unconstrained by conventional moral or ethical considerations. This alignment with Redbeard's philosophy forms a core aspect of Gilmore's leadership within the Church of Satan.

Contradictions in Political Stances

However, a closer examination of Peter H. Gilmore's political stances reveals a striking contradiction with the philosophy of "Might Is Right." While he admires Redbeard's text, Gilmore's actual political positions often veer towards progressive and libertarian ideals that champion personal freedoms, social justice, and the protection of marginalized groups. Herein lies the disconnect.

Advocacy for LGBTQ+ Rights: The Church of Satan, under Gilmore's leadership, has been notably supportive of LGBTQ+ rights and has consistently opposed discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity. This stance starkly contrasts the merciless worldview proposed in "Might Is Right," which essentially argues that those who can assert dominance should do so without regard for the rights or dignity of others.

Individualism vs. Social Justice: Gilmore promotes individualism and supports social justice principles. These principles advocate for equitable treatment and opportunities for all members of society, often challenging the notion that "might makes right." In the realm of social justice, the emphasis is on addressing systemic inequalities and supporting the vulnerable, which directly contradicts the callous ethos of Redbeard's philosophy.

Freedom of Expression: Gilmore and the Church of Satan advocate for freedom of expression and artistic freedom. While these principles align with individualism, they also defend diverse perspectives and voices, which is at odds with the concept that the strongest should dominate and suppress dissent.

Rejection of Discrimination: The Church of Satan, under Gilmore, explicitly rejects racism, sexism, and bigotry. These positions challenge the core premise of "Might Is Right," which inherently involves the domination of certain groups by others, often based on power and dominance rather than principles of equality or fairness.

While Peter H. Gilmore champions the philosophy of "Might Is Right" as a core tenet of the Church of Satan, his political stances and advocacy for individual freedoms and social justice demonstrate a significant contradiction. Embracing the principles of social justice, inclusion, and equal treatment for marginalized groups fundamentally contradicts the "might is right" ethos, which is inherently hierarchical and promotes the unchecked assertion of power.

Conclusion

In the crucible of scientific scrutiny, the "Might Is Right" philosophy emerges as an intellectual house of cards, ready to collapse under the weight of empirical evidence and reasoned argumentation. These scientific examples collectively challenge the doctrine's myopic focus on dominance and power.

However, history narrates the tale of the born killer, seldom recognized as the mad, stupid, mindless slaughterer he is. And yet, humans have demonstrated a resilience for Christ-like behavior that challenges misanthropic assertions.

But that doesn't remedy the horror of our impending doom into the dark night of the soul. Nor does it forgive the horrifying legacy of generational child abuse and the unforgivable, tortuous injustices of this human experience. These revelations invoke an antinatalist perspective and taunt nihilistic conversion, which, might I add, is a convenient remedy to the human nightmare.

— Zzenn

Are Entitled Americans Becoming Apocalyptic Zombies?

Let's face it: many Americans are spoiled, entitled brats. I should know. I've been here all of my life and fallen prey to bouts of childish tantrums over my cell phone losing transmission. If you spend a day keenly observing American behavior, you are bound to witness the horrifying inconveniences that trigger fits of rage. For example:The car ahead is driving the speed limit, robbing you of a car's length.A Google Play Store app isn't downloading.The waitress served sausage instead of bacon.Someone is taking too long in the public bathroom.The bank teller asked you to wait.The convenience store is out of breakfast cookies.The Amazon package has been delayed a day.Someone else beat you to a parking space.Your latte was too warm, too hot, too foamy.The person on Facebook didn't "like" your comment.Tech support didn't respond within seconds of your request.You've been put on hold for 10 minutes, God forbid, 30 min.The tire shop is taking 40 min instead of 30 min to balance your tires.Netflicks canceled your favorite show, and you must relocate to AppleTV.We reside in a culture adorned with every conceivable luxury and convenience. However, the paradox lies in the fact that the more comfortable a society becomes, the more likely social tantrums will break out when their goodies are taken away. This phenomenon transcends class distinctions; it's a quintessential human predicament. Both the middle and upper classes find themselves ensnared by this predicament, mirroring the actions of the lower class, who resort to theft in pursuing what they perceive as their entitlement as primates.The Dark Side of IndividualismIn the shadow of individualism lurks the human predator whose self-absorption and disregard for the greater good leads to a society plagued by stupefying tunnel vision. While personal autonomy is vital, its excess breeds entitlement, prioritizing personal interests over the vulnerable. Unchecked, this pursuit of success disregards the environment and common welfare, threatening the very essence of individualism.

There needs to be a scientific assessment made based on the statistics of the last 200 years. If the American Dream is so great, then why is the U.S. number one in the exploitation of child sex trafficking? Why is the public dumbed down? Why are our crime rates so high?

One could argue that America has been taken over from within by communist factions (and I agree), but they got away with it because Americans have been blinded by the light. Drunk on the "Freedom Dream," they dance around in their Disneyland hamster cage, addicted to the entertainment industry.The American Dream? Or Nightmare?The American Dream is a cultural Disneyland that offers personal autonomy. Immigrants come here to be their own King and Queen, to rule their Kingdom, and, if given enough religious freedom, become their own self-inflated Gods.

America has been a dreamer's destination, and thus, the world has been immigrating here with wide eyes and hope. But how sustainable is this individualism model? How long can we afford to provide a king's ransom to everyone crossing the border?

Where has this individualism got us? Our country has one of the highest crime rates in the world. We lead the pack in starting wars with other countries. Our homeless population is off the charts. Drug trafficking is an epidemic. And we are heading into World War 3 with a Nuclear missile strapped to our collective ass. And let us not forget 1st Amendment violating Christians waving the national Jesus flag and the liberals jumping around like Satanic dodo birds. It's a circus.

Now, don't get me wrong. I am profoundly aware of the liberties this country has afforded us compared to other countries. But don't let freedom blind you from what's lurking underneath the surface. This country has always been ruled by predatory forces on a mission to rule the world, no matter how many lives it takes to get there.

“Human rights and wrongs are not determined by Justice, but by Might. Disguise it as you may, the naked sword is still king-maker and king-breaker, as of yore. All other theories are lies and — lures”

“Government is founded on property. Property is founded on conquest. Conquest is founded on power. All power is founded on brain and brawn.”
― Ragnar Redbeard, Might is Right

The Illusion of FreedomPessimistically, our society is like a zoo for human primates who are allotted a certain amount of space to roam. While they believe they are in control of the lives they don't own, their freedoms exist within the choices of McDonald's or Taco Bell, Chase Bank or Wells Fargo, Yahtzee or Mr. Potato Head. The alpha monkeys at the top of the food chain occasionally expand their hamster cage with new tunnels, bells, and squeaky toys. They may even throw in an extra carrot or see if the 'sapien chimps' enjoy the taste of bugs for a change. The sadistic ones (just for shit and giggles) occasionally throw in a wasp or rattlesnake for entertainment.
The problem with unchecked, equally dispensed freedom is it is based on wishful thinking. Like the delusional idea that "all humans are equal," there's an embarrassing lack of evidence to support this claim. I agree that human rights apply to all sapiens, but the fact of the matter is humans are not equal. Some are born with higher IQs than others. Some have better genes. Some are born deformed, ugly, and impoverished, and others are born handsome, rich, and talented. If anything, the universe is profoundly unfair and unjust — and brutally so.Zombie ApocalypseTo even entertain the notion of the dark side of individualism catalyzing a "zombie apocalypse" is to delve into the realms of dystopian fantasy. However, it is not entirely devoid of merit. When allowed to fester, the pernicious elements of unchecked individualism can generate a figurative "zombification" of society.

Picture a world where self-interest reigns supreme, empathy wanes, and collective responsibility disintegrates. In such a landscape, the insatiable pursuit of personal gain could metaphorically transform individuals into moral zombies, creatures devoid of compassion and empathy.

On the flip side, if an entitled population of 350 million were suddenly deprived of their toys and thrust into a 3rd world apocalyptic environment, the level of adult child depravity would confirm the predictive programming hypothesis of Hollywood's flesh-eating sapiens.

While the image of literal undead hordes may be fantastical, the existential threat posed by the erosion of our humanity in the wake of unchecked individualism is a stark and unsettling reality worth contemplating. It serves as a chilling reminder that the consequences of our choices in the realm of individualism can, in their own way, spawn a uniquely disquieting form of "apocalypse."
Headed toward ChaosI am convinced that America is heading toward social chaos, a meltdown never before seen in history. We will polarize from a dream to a cultural nightmare. The highs to which we have climbed will be followed with a catastrophic decline - Icarus will fall - we have come too close to the sun, and the "powers that be" are leveraging this Enantiodromia swing:

Enantiodromia is a principle introduced by psychiatrist Carl Jung. In Psychological Types, Jung defines enantiodromia as "the emergence of the unconscious opposite in the course of time." It is similar to the principle of equilibrium in the natural world in that any extreme is opposed by the system to restore balance. When things get to their extreme, they turn into their opposite. [1]

ConclusionIn light of this delightful topic, we must be rational, down to earth, practical, able to assess the situation and act accordingly. We must be aware of our environment. We must slap ourselves out of the trance. We must wake up and increase our chances of survival. Make no mistake, as of the writing of this article, American society is getting increasingly agitated, and all we need is a major event to push everyone into a manic state of aggression and desperation.

My advice is to walk through the zombie horde without being noticed. Don't make eye contact. Store your supplies safely, and prepare for the Zombie Apocalypse. And the next person who yells "Conspiracy Theorist" at you, just reply with:

I'd rather wear a tin foil hat than a blindfold."

— Zzenn

The Stupefying Hypocrisy of Atheists on Social Media

In 2012, my journey into atheism led me to shed the shackles of irrational religious thinking. I promptly sought to clarify the term's definition to ensure I represented it accurately. An atheist, I discovered, is someone who has moved away from theism. Theism, in turn, is the belief in gods with human-like attributes residing in alternate realms. Therefore, an atheist is essentially a person who does not subscribe to the assertions made by theists.

What I've observed as a concern with some atheists is their tendency to swing to the opposite extreme and dismiss the inner dimension of human beings entirely. It's crucial to recognize the significant distinction between mythical gods and the intricate psycho-emotional ecosystem of the human organism. You might expect those who transition into skepticism to replace orthodoxy with rigorous critical thinking. However, I've noticed a propensity among some to "pose" as critical thinkers rather than genuinely applying critical thinking in their approach.

I did not veer towards the extreme of brain-dead dogmatic nihilism and discard the wealth of human experiences in our inner world that spans hundreds of thousands of years. I recognized that figures like Carl Jung, Freud, Sam Harris, Susan Blackmore, and other reputable researchers were not simply dismissing our subjective "spiritual" experiences. I acknowledged that my lifetime had been filled with extraordinary experiences that couldn't be casually dismissed just because I had embraced a new identity as an "Atheist." Instead, I embraced critical thinking and continued my rigorous exploration of the intricacies of reality.

Atheist Zealots

As a new atheist, I took pride in joining a community rooted in reason and rationality. I found inspiration in the wisdom of literary giants like Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Christopher Hitchens, Dan Barker, and Sam Harris. So much so, I embarked on a project dedicated to debunking the claims of New Age gurus.

As time passed, I became reluctantly aware of the reactive "black and white" thinking of atheists on social media. Having been in the Christian and New Age community for decades, I was very familiar with the behavior of delusional believers. Their reactions to opposing views were irrational and lacked a genuine open mind. They were protecting their position rather than embracing new ideas.

“A fool is made more of a fool, when their mouth is more open than their mind.”

― Anthony Liccione

I witnessed atheists attacking their opposition like mindless, reactive zealots while waving the flag of reason. They used logic with emotion. When I pointed out this hypocrisy to them, their response only solidified my initial assessment. This, in turn, left me with a growing sense of disillusionment with the community.

I concluded that individuals, regardless of their intellectual pursuits, can succumb to irrationality if they haven't grappled with their own psychological complexities. The more they convince themselves of their intellectual growth, the more they drift away from the practice of self-reflection.

The similarities between religious people and atheists were astounding. The more I called them out on their reactive adolescent behavior, the more they 'doubled down on dumb' while pretending to be sophisticated. Nothing different than the demeanor of the faithful. It was rather amusing.

If an individual, previously adhering to a religious belief system while struggling with ignorance and scientific illiteracy, transitions to atheism only to discard the fundamental principles of critical thinking, I would argue that this shift will lead to a decline in intellectual prowess. It's crucial to differentiate between ignorance and stupidity. The former you can reason with; the latter is a futile endeavor.

Definition of stu·pid:

Lacking the ability to learn and understand things.Not sensible or logical.Slow of mind.Given to unintelligent decisions or acts.Lacking intelligence or reason.Acting in an unintelligent or careless manner.Lacking interest or point.Showing poor judgment or little intelligence.

These self-righteous atheists posture as intelligent skeptics skilled in the craft of logic, virtue signaling their newly developed IQ while acting like adult children with a new squeaky toy. They convert from religious dummies to skeptical dummies. They hop on a new identity and become emotionally reactive pseudo-intellectuals. They attack anything that resembles spirituality without investigation. They act nothing different than religious zealots who mindlessly insult posts that offend their fragile belief system.

Here's one of my responses to the stupefying hypocrisy I received over my book:

The Christians bark at me with their Bible quotes (to be expected), and the Atheists and skeptics react to my book's cover without reading it while lecturing me on "logic and intelligence." Not only are religious people mind-controlled, but Atheists and skeptics literally contradict themselves with their lazy poop-throwing. 

There's nothing impressive about judging a book by its cover. It's better to stay on the couch with your Christopher Hitchens book, beer, and Cheetos than to post a pretensious comment.

Oh the Hypocrisy

Atheists often take pride in signaling their elevated status as critical thinkers. They revel in being free from the constraints of faith and ignorance. However, it's intriguing to note that they sometimes find themselves guilty of the very things they accuse religious individuals of. For instance:

Not thinkingBeing reactiveBeing unscientificIntellectual lazinessResorting to insultsHaving no argumentNot using logicBeing unwilling to learnBeing dogmaticBeing dumbLacking Reason

My book, "unSpiritual: A Spiritual Journey," is the perfect test for Atheists because it was written by an atheist who redefines spirituality from a natural perspective. And what's hilarious is they take one look at the cover of my book, bypass the "unSpiritual" in bold letters, and proceed to accuse me of being religious and delusional. When I ask if they read the book before criticizing it, they either disappear or, in most cases, 'double down on dumb' by arguing nonsensically. In other words, they got caught acting like reactive, non-thinking fools. I have yet to find an atheist who responds, "No problem, I'll read your book and get back to you."

While I was writing this article, I got a few comments from an atheist who had a tantrum over my book promotion. He started out by posting an emoji of "poop" and proceeded to write:

"And how much money did you grift last year? You are so full of crap."

Afterward, Mr Genius posted a picture of a person wiping their butt with a religious napkin. No amount of calling this guy out for failing to apply critical thinking or having the intellectual integrity to reason with me would change his reaction. This is the same behavior I get from every, and I mean "every" religious person whom I call out by quoting the genocides of Jehovah.

The Feeling of Being Wrong

I'm convinced that the number one reason atheists and religious people double down on dumb when they have lost an argument is to avoid the feeling of being wrong. It's nothing short of fascinating. Even the most ardent non-believers, when viewed through the lens of psychological scrutiny, reveal themselves as mere mortals wrestling with the age-old quandaries of human cognition.

Here's an exhaustive list of why atheists avoid the feeling of being wrong:

Cognitive Dissonance: Even those who confidently proclaim the absence of deities are not immune to the pangs of cognitive dissonance. The mental disquiet that arises when evidence threatens their convictions can be a powerful impetus to cling to their existing beliefs.

Confirmation Bias: Atheists fall prey to confirmation bias. They often seek out information that fortifies their nihilistic worldview while conveniently discarding anything that contradicts it.

Threat to Identity: When an atheist's worldview is shaken, they may grapple with existential questions, pondering what remains of their sense of self without their atheistic stance.

Social Influence: The sway of peer groups is a force to be reckoned with. Atheists may hesitate to explore divergent beliefs or ideas for fear of social ostracism or the withering gaze of fellow non-believers.

Emotional Investment: Emotional bonds to beliefs run deep in the human psyche. The emotional attachment to their convictions can make it emotionally arduous to consider alternative perspectives.

Fear of Change: Change is unsettling as the human condition. Admitting to being wrong can disrupt the equilibrium of one's life, replacing certainty with gnawing uncertainty.

Loss of Control: Owning up to error can make one feel powerless or as if they've relinquished control. The uncertainty that accompanies a shift in beliefs can be profoundly disconcerting.

Avoidance and Denial: Atheists, too, have their repertoire of evasion tactics and denial mechanisms to shield themselves from the discomfort of admitting they might be wrong.

Reduced Self-Worth: The acknowledgment of error can strike a grievous blow to one's self-esteem. Like any other believers, Atheists might resist changing their beliefs to protect their fragile sense of competence and self-worth.

Emotional Distress: Let us not forget the potent emotional maelstrom accompanying the sense of being wrong. Fear of shame, embarrassment, guilt, or anxiety can be formidable adversaries to embracing alternative viewpoints.

Motivated Reasoning: The human desires and aspirations that shape our thinking are no strangers to atheists. When confronted with evidence challenging their convictions, they may unconsciously twist it to better fit their beliefs.

Escalation of Commitment: The discomfort of being wrong often leads to a curious phenomenon known as the "escalation of commitment." Atheists might redouble their efforts to uphold their non-belief, investing more zeal and conviction to vindicate their prior decisions.

Information Overload: In our age of information deluge, atheists are not immune to drowning in data. They may selectively filter information to align with their established beliefs to ward off this deluge.

Selective Memory: Memory's capricious nature can sway even the minds of atheists. They may remember information that buttresses their position while dismissing or downplaying opposing evidence.

Inconsistent Reasoning: Just like anyone else, atheists may fall into the trap of inconsistent reasoning, applying different standards of logic to their own beliefs than they do to opposing viewpoints.

Blind Certainty

In conclusion, this scrutiny reveals that the realm of atheism, like any other belief system, is not impervious to the complexities of human psychology. It is a compelling reminder that we are all susceptible to these psychological pitfalls, no matter our convictions. The fear of being wrong should galvanize us to a higher intellectual standard—a standard that demands an unwavering commitment to critical thinking, open discourse, and the courage to confront uncomfortable truths, even when they unsettle the very foundations of our staunchest convictions.

I recommend that atheists and religious devotees seek to "know thyself" before donning the garments of confidence, apologetics, debate, and intellectualism. All human primates share the same genetic structure, no matter what ideologies they defend. The only hope I can see for the pretentious sapiens is to beware of self-deception and keep an open mind.

During a recent debate with a skeptic, our disagreement revolved around the concept of an afterlife. He firmly believed that there was no such thing, while I stressed the idea that he couldn't assert the non-existence of an afterlife any more than its existence. After a prolonged exchange marked by repetitive arguments, I eventually conceded. My point remained unassailable: no atheist can claim to know definitively that there is no afterlife, as none have experienced it firsthand. This fact was beyond his ability to comprehend.

He was blinded by what he wanted to be true, the very thing atheists accuse believers of.

For those of you who have been following this blog, you are well aware of my misanthropic slant. I consider everyone an asshole until proven otherwise. Thus, I doubt this article will change the behavior of atheists on social media. So, for the unforeseen future, I will continue to enjoy the circus, one hypocritical poop-throwing comment after another.

— Zzenn

The Dark Bible: Violence, Contradictions, Bad Science, The Jesus Myth

The Bible, that ancient tome venerated by millions as the word of God, has long been a source of fervent devotion and fierce debate. While the faithful hold it aloft as a beacon of divine wisdom, the truth is that it is filled with violence, contradictions, inconsistencies, and an ample lack of evidence for a historical Jesus. It is a mosaic of human creation, comprised of diverse books from different authors across centuries. The inescapable result of this hodgepodge of literary efforts is a patchwork quilt of moral, theological, and narrative discord.

In this article, I present overwhelming evidence that makes this historical book no more legitimate than a Mother Goose fable, horrifically violent, and more absurd than the notion of the flat earth. 

Violence in the Bible

The Killing of Children: Jehovah is a big fan of killing children through his many Old Testament genocides. Christians like to think Jehovah has changed his ways since the Old Testament but fail to notice the Hell that awaits billions of unbaptized children. A few examples of Jehovah's infanticidal antics are:

"With you I will shatter men and women, old people and children, young men and maidens."
— Jeremiah 51:20-26
"And at midnight the LORD killed all the firstborn sons in the land of Egypt."
— Exodus 12:29-30
"Your children will die at birth or perish in the womb or never even be conceived."
— Hosea 9:11-16

"I will release wild animals that will kill your children and destroy your cattle."

— Leviticus 26:21-22

Joshua's Holy Genocide: The book of Joshua describes the Israelites' divinely sanctioned bloodlust as they carved their way through Canaan, slaughtering the inhabitants with God's ostensible blessing.

Isaac's Near-Sacrifice: In a shocking test of obedience, God orders Abraham to sacrifice his son, Isaac, only to withdraw the command at the last moment. The moral quandary this presents is staggering.

Sodom and Gomorrah's Fiery Demise: God's penchant for the theatrical reaches a crescendo as He decides to rain fire and brimstone upon two sinful cities, incinerating the inhabitants in a divine barbecue.

The Plagues of Egypt: The Exodus narrative recounts ten plagues that struck Egypt, causing immense suffering and death among its population, including killing the firstborn.

Inconsistencies and Contradictions

Two Tales of Creation: Genesis offers not one but two creation accounts. One says humans were created after animals, while the other claims we preceded them. Which is it?

Muddled Genealogies: The Bible's genealogies are a genealogist's nightmare. They are a maze of contradictions, making it impossible to trace a linear history from Adam to Jesus.

Theological Incongruities: Disparate books within the Bible often present conflicting theological views, with divergent portrayals of God's nature and intentions.

Inconsistent Moral Guidance: The Bible sometimes offers conflicting moral guidance, with one passage advocating love and compassion, while another endorses violence and punishment.

Jaw-Dropping Pseudoscience

Cosmology and the Geocentric Universe

Ah, the Bible's audacious claim that the Earth is the gravitational nucleus of the universe, with celestial bodies obediently circling our planet. This geocentric absurdity, as evident in passages like Joshua 10:12-13, narrating the sun's curious halt, is the stuff of ancient superstition. The Earth does not command the cosmos, and modern astronomy long ago consigned this notion to the annals of discredited dogma.

Creationism and Young Earth Beliefs

Behold the stubborn persistence of biblical literalism, which propounds a tender age for our planet, a mere speck in the vast cosmos. The assertion that Earth is a juvenile 6,000 to 10,000 years old clashes spectacularly with the mountainous body of scientific evidence that supports an Earth aged at 4.5 billion years. Creationist dogma, with its six-day creation tale, dances gleefully in the land of pseudoscience, stubbornly ignoring the empirical ocean of geological knowledge.

Noah's Ark and a Global Flood

Let us not forget the colossal deluge, the magnum opus of divine destruction in the Bible—the Noah's Ark saga. This tale of global inundation, repopulation, and a massive wooden vessel accommodating a menagerie of Earth's creatures defies scientific scrutiny and rationality. The global flood myth, rooted in earlier Mesopotamian stories, belongs to the realm of religious mythos, not geohydrology.

Picture a massive, seafaring menagerie consisting of all the Earth's creatures, from the docile lamb to the ferocious lion. According to this yarn, predators and prey were meant to cohabitate peacefully in this floating circus. Now, try to envision the logistics of this preposterous endeavor. Lions, which are not known for their vegetarian inclinations, somehow refrained from making meals of their fellow passengers. Hippos, renowned for their cantankerousness, apparently put aside their temperament for the journey. The absurdity is staggering.

Like so many others, Noah's Ark is tale is a testament to the remarkable suspension of reason that religious faith can inspire. It may make for a compelling Sunday school story, but it crumbles under the slightest scrutiny in the light of reason and evidence.

Medicine and Dietary Practices

Within the Bible's hallowed pages, curious medical remedies and dietary directives abound. Leviticus 11 provides an eclectic list of clean and unclean animals, possibly serving more as a religious dietary code than as a repository of nutritional wisdom. These quaint instructions may have historical significance, but they offer little guidance in our pursuit of medical enlightenment.

Miracles and Supernatural Phenomena

The Bible revels in a carnival of miracles and supernatural phenomena—resurrections, healings, and angelic apparitions aplenty. These biblical wonders, though foundational to religious faith, operate beyond the scientific compass. Empirical evidence eludes such divine theatrics, relegating them to the realm of faith, not science.

The Absence of Evidence for a Historical Jesus

Contemporary Historical Records: Despite the widespread impact that Jesus is said to have had on the region, there are no contemporary historical records from the 1st century that directly mention him. This absence of contemporary accounts raises questions about the reliability of later accounts.

Secular Historical Sources: Prominent historians of the time, such as Josephus and Tacitus, did not mention Jesus in their writings. Although there are disputed references to Jesus in the works of Josephus, their authenticity remains a subject of debate among scholars.

Silence in Roman Records: The Roman Empire maintained extensive records of various events and individuals during the period when Jesus is said to have lived. However, there is no mention of Jesus or the events surrounding his life in these records.

Absence of Archaeological Evidence: Despite extensive archaeological excavations in the region, there is no concrete archaeological evidence that directly corroborates the life and activities of Jesus, such as inscriptions or artifacts directly linked to him.

Inconsistencies in Gospel Accounts: The four Gospels in the New Testament, the primary sources for information about Jesus, contain differences and contradictions in their narratives about his life, raising questions about their historical accuracy.

Reliance on Oral Tradition: The Gospels were written several decades after the events they describe, and during that time, they relied on oral tradition for the transmission of stories about Jesus. This raises concerns about potential embellishments and changes in the narratives over time.

Similarities to Other Religious Figures: Some critics argue that the story of Jesus bears similarities to earlier religious figures and myths, leading to the possibility that aspects of his story were influenced by existing mythologies.

Varied Interpretations of "Jesus": Scholars and theologians have interpreted the character of Jesus in various ways, ranging from a purely historical figure to a mythological or symbolic one. The diversity of interpretations underscores the challenges in establishing a definitive historical account.

Jesus, the Celestial Zombie

I know this point pisses off the faithful, but it's technically accurate to suggest Jesus is a celestial zombie. Although he wasn't lifeless or apathetic, or lacking in judgment, he was reanimated and walked out of a grave along with the rest of the town's of zombies:

The tombs were opened, and many bodies of the saints (God's people) who had fallen asleep [in death] were raised [to life]; and coming out of the tombs after His resurrection, they entered the holy city (Jerusalem) and appeared to many people.

— Matthew 27:52-53

In Closing

As you can see, the Bible is not what Christians pretend it is. You would have to be under a spell to not see what is "actually there" in print. And this, my friends, is why religion is dangerous, especially in the hands of those government officials making policy decisions.

Armageddon would not exist without the fictional narrative of this absurd book. I believe the Apocalypse is a script being played out by the alpha monkeys at the top of the food chain. They have the technology to fool the public (weather warfare, UFOs), just like they had the cunning wit to invent Christianity.

It's time humans grow up and take responsibility for society and the planet. Instead of projecting good and evil (psychological shadow) onto invisible Mother Goose characters, humanity must "own" their ethical and immoral urges rooted in their primate genes. Who knows, some epigenetic factors may jumpstart a decent, intelligent, global society.

I'd throw my chips on the "unlikely" option if I was a betting man.

— Zzenn

Why People Throw Verbal Poop on Social Media

Contrary to the religious notion that humans were magically spawned from divine hands, the biological evidence reveals our ancestral monkeyhood.

Monkeys throw feces as a form of communication to signal aggression, dominance, or territoriality among group members or in response to potential threats; as a defense mechanism to deter predators or rivals; for territory marking to establish boundaries and communicate their presence; as a playful or social interaction among young individuals; and sometimes, as a way to cope with stress or frustration.

Interestingly, odorous colon fruits are also commonly hurled by humans, as demonstrated in the following cases:

Chimpanzee throws poop directly into Grandma's face (for context). [1]Ohio man throws feces in court after sentencing. [2]NYC man accused of smearing feces on woman’s face. [3]Convicted assailant throughs poop at Erie County deputy. [4]Houston-area man accused of throwing human feces at neighbor's home. [5]Florida woman throws a bucket of human feces on the landlord. [6]LAPD arrests man caught on video throwing bag of poop. [7]Homeless man caught on video throwing feces at LA business owner. [8]Woman caught on camera pooping on floor and throwing it at an employee. [9]Suspect keeps throwing poop on Seattle council member's lawn. [10]Woman throws poop at coffee shop employee who denied her restroom access. [11]

I could write a book on police reports of public poop attacks. The similarities between humans and chimpanzees dealing with stress under pressure are evident.

Social Media Poop Throwing

The human ego is always at stake on social media. If you infringe on another's psychological territory, you may get punished in the form of verbal poop-throwing. Depending on what exists in one's unconscious, the intensity of the digital odor will vary. One must type carefully so as not to disturb the opinionated beast.

Humans need to be right. They highly regard their own opinions because they're identified with them. When you oppose their opinion, you oppose their identity. When you oppose their identity, you threaten their psychic existence.

Here are some common reasons why humans engage in digital poop-throwing:

Anonymity: Social media provides a level of anonymity that can make people feel less accountable for their actions. Individuals may be more inclined to insult others when they believe they can do so without real-world consequences. Thus, they can throw poop from behind a barrier.Frustration and Venting: Social media is a perfect outlet to vent frustration and anger. When people encounter something that upsets them, they can safely lash out at others as a way to release their negative emotions.Attention-Seeking: One can pump up their social status through displays of force with insults and inflammatory comments. Just like chimpanzees do when they demonstrate their dominance in the group. They will throw sticks and rocks and break branches in a show of strength.
Group Dynamics: In some cases, people may insult others as a way to fit in or conform to the norms of a particular online community or group. They may feel pressured to engage in negative behavior to maintain their online social status.Miscommunication: Online communication lacks many nonverbal cues present in face-to-face interactions, making it easier for misunderstandings to occur. What may be intended as a harmless comment can be misinterpreted as an insult.Tribalism and Polarization: Social media platforms can sometimes foster an "us versus them" mentality. People may insult those who hold opposing views or belong to different groups to reinforce their identity and beliefs.Impersonal Nature: The digital divide between individuals can make it easier to forget that there are real people on the other side of the screen. This impersonal nature can make some people less empathetic and more likely to insult others.Lack of Consequences: Many social media platforms have limited consequences for offensive behavior, which can embolden individuals to engage in insults without fear of being held accountable.Emotional Reactivity: Online interactions can elicit strong emotional reactions, and in the heat of the moment, people may say hurtful things without fully considering the impact of their words.Cultural and Social Norms: In some online communities, insulting or trolling is seen as a form of humor or entertainment. People may engage in this behavior because they perceive it as socially acceptable within their online group.

As you can see, humans are no different than monkeys, aside from their mannequin wit. An argument is a territorial battle. One person wants to dominate the other through their words. Some digitally stab their opponents, while others imagine taking them to the ground with a victory dance while beating their chest.

The Deadly LOL

Emojis and acronyms play an important role in the poop-thrower's contest, conveying intimidating and condescending facial expressions and symbols.

One tactic used is the "laugh out loud" acronym (lol). This term triggers images of one's opponent sardonically mocking them. It is designed to humiliate and disrespect the target with the delusional aim of watching them succumb to their mocking. However, the opposite is usually the case. Humans are more likely to react aggressively to such contempt. So, the conversation never leads to diplomacy above the putrid exchange.

Keep in mind that social media turd-tossing is the only tool humans have to deal with threats because of the lack of physical proximity. If they were in person, you're likely to witness expanded chests, flailing arms, emotionally charged hand gestures, and the death stare. The size of the human primate also plays a role in the intimidation process, which makes me wonder if the social media masters will create an expandable emoji.

Once the battle for being "right" escalates into vitriolic expression, the participant who is losing the battle may go down in a ball of caca-juggling flames. They have no control over their digital nemesis. They are unable to reach into the comment thread and choke their assailant. However, the limits of the digital prison bars do not stop them from stalking their prey via a public record search until they calm down and treat themselves to a banana split.

The Historical Turd-Toss

From the mile-high view, humans throughout history have always thrown poop. In wartime, impressive fecal weapons have been deployed with toxically odorous results. Nuclear bombs, weather warfare, tactical drones, and DEW weapons (to name a few) create shit-storms around the globe, and there's no end in sight for what the 'planet of the apes' has in store for us.

Even our language is filled with various nuances of this stinky term:

Bullshit: Refers to something that is untrue or deceptive.Shitshow: Describes a situation or event that is chaotic or disastrously disorganized.Shitfaced: Slang for being extremely drunk.Shitstorm: Refers to a situation that generates a lot of controversy.Shit-talking: Engaging in negative or critical talk about someone or something.Shithead: A derogatory term used to insult someone.You're full of shit: Referring to one's questionable words and actions.Shit-happens: A term for unexpected or unfortunate events in life.Enough of your shit: blunt way of saying you're fed up with someone's behavior.You're shitting me: An informal way of expressing disbelief or skepticism.

Despite our monkey cousins throwing poop balls due to a shortage of twigs and rocks in the area, there's a term I find quite revealing. It raises our lowly disputes to the level of the Gods. It cleanses our minds of the stained perception, defines our genius, and brings honor to our battle cry — Holy Shit!

My recommendation for the digital jungle is to learn critical thinking and develop a skill for diplomacy. Learn to listen to your opponent and argue skillfully without ad hominem attacks (poop-throwing). Know when you are dealing with an unworthy opponent and swiftly end the debate. You may want to smudge the incompetent troll with a block and 'delete' —  don't feed the monkeys.

Occasionally, an argument gives way to a valuable conversation and may even become an alliance; together, you can start a 'poop group' and throw turds at your adversaries.

— Zzenn

Why Spiritual and Religious People are Racist Against Apes

Have you ever wondered why Christians and New Agers don't post declarations of their faith with chimpanzees or gorillas on Facebook? You know, the typical post with "Jesus is Lord" next to a lion or "The Lord is Your Shepherd" with Jesus holding a sheep. The New Ager version might have a dolphin splashing in the background with "Raise Your Vibration," or "Ascension is Near," etc.

But why are apes excluded from these thumbnails? When did lions, whales, and cuddly wolves steal the show from our ape relatives? Shouldn't chimpanzees be the poster children of our proud existence? 

Although the answer is obvious, I'll say it this way:

"We are living on the planet of the apes, and the apes don't know they're apes."

I think there's an underlying, unconscious sense of shame among humans due to their genetic chimpanzee heritage. It's akin to how someone might feel after moving from a poverty-stricken neighborhood to a wealthier area of the city and then actively avoiding any association with their less fortunate past. The idea of being compared to apes is something that humans tend to dislike strongly!

This may be why they invent grandiose stories about their divinity. Declarations from " I am a Child of God" to "I Am God" position human primates in the celestial category. No longer are they lowly material beings. They are cosmic celebrities. And any ridiculous story will do as long as it separates them from silly-looking chimpanzees. 

I am going to call this perplexing oddity "Apeism," short for monkey racism.

This is why spiritual and religious ideologies deny evolution and dissociate from the natural world. They are spiritual beings, "souls" inside bodies. Scientology, the mothership of substance dualism, calls them "Thetans," which are invisible beings operating human meat suits. And for the low price of $100,000 dollars and thousands of hours of head-smacking self-interrogation, you can join the ranks of elite apes pretending to be Marvel Heroes.

I am not suggesting there isn't an afterlife. We may indeed float out of our mortal coils into ethereal realms far more interesting than this sandbox. Thousands of NDEs are reported globally describing fantastical dimensions of timelessness that make earth life look like quicksand. In some cases, witnesses say they have been gone months, just minutes after resurrecting, with vivid descriptions that defy the ability of a dying brain.

If our souls transmigrate, what would be the point of being human if we dissociate from it? How can one have a human animal experience if they spend their lives identifying as a ball of light in a monkey costume? On the other side of the spectrum, Atheists are more likely to accept their "apeness" and resign their disembodied state. But realizing we are human animals does not require an atheistic perspective. People from all walks of life exist without discarnate confessions if given the chance to grow up without hereditary religion.

If the Simulation Hypothesis is true, that we live in a digital matrix, then the avatars would be programmed as their character. However, the question begs, could the plot involve becoming self-aware of the video game? To self-realize the protagonist in an elaborate script as a human primate suffering from an identity problem? Who knows, the idea invokes a smirk.

Hours could be spent speculating about existential matters, but the one thing that is self-evident and requires no faith is our biological clock. It is an automatic mechanism born from millions of years of natural selection. And because of this evolutionary continuum, when we unpack our bestial selves, there is no one operating the levers — free will, the crux of religious programming, is an illusion, as I explained in my article, "Are Humans Gods, Apes, or Biological Puppets? Free Will Narcissism." 

Another motivator for our cognitive dissonance is death anxiety — Memento Mori — remember you must die. This shock to consciousness puts us on a roller coaster with the foreknowledge that we will go careening off the tracks without assurances of survival. This horror of consciousness haunts us in the wee hours of the night, molesting our dreams and tempting negotiations with the Grim Reaper. We have nowhere to go on this conveyor belt but forward into the abyss.

Do I have a happy ending for you? Nope. But I do have a recommendation. Make yourself useful on terra firma and live your ape life to the fullest. Donate to charitable causes. Help stop child abuse and sex trafficking. Create some fantastic art. Investigate your psyche and become a self-realized sapien guru. Write down your bucket list and leap into the adventure.

Or, you can do what I do: Watch the circus with an occasional glance at my watch.

— Zzenn

Is America the United States of Satanism? The Brutal Truth

The Almighty Dollar and Almighty God are in a dead heat for universal worship in the United States, where predation is the name of the game.

— Gerald B. Lorentz 

The United States, often hailed as the land of opportunity and freedom, is known for its dominant economic system of capitalism. It was founded on the genocide of native people, its holidays are based on the pagan calendar of witchcraft, and it is responsible for more wars than any other country. In spite of that,  it has provided a path for global citizens to become their own kings and queens through economic autonomy.

Simultaneously, Christianity influences the country's culture and values through its belief in the human sacrifice of their messiah, Jesus, who saved them from an eternal concentration camp created by the invisible Father in Heaven.

But is America a Christian country or a Satanic country? Capitalism is based on the survival of the fittest. It is Darwinian. It is the philosophy of the human predator. It completely opposes Christianity, which denies evolution and promotes the principle of "love your enemies" and "turn the other cheek."

Despite the "prosperity evangelist" who forgot Jesus was broke, there is nothing capitalistic about Christianity. Yet you see Christian ministries raking in donations for luxury jets. And they do it with a currency filled with occult symbols, such as the All-Seeing-Eye on top of an Egyptian pyramid on the dollar bill — very Satanic if you ask me.

Satanism, like Capitalism, is about the individual. It is about personal power. They are elitists. Satanists do not care about the human herd. They care about those who, like themselves, contribute to their survival.

The predator seeks the easiest prey. The weak are natural targets of predators. It is the way capitalism works. Capitalism is tailor-made for a predatory animal. Communist societies execute economic predators. Capitalist societies honor them.

— Gerald B. Lorentz 

On the other hand, Christians are called to "save" humanity from God's wrath. They are here to serve God and give their lives for his gospel. They are not called to get rich, threaten others with hell, or act like elitists. But they do. They act like their God, Jehovah, vengeful, threatening, and superior. I have lost count of the times Christians have threatened me with Hell. They judge me as "separate from Life." If I challenge their doctrine, they double down on "Noah's Ark" level buffoonery. They also indoctrinate children with the damaging belief they are born in sin until baptized into the human sacrifice of Jesus. This is called hereditary religion.

Capitalism is sublimated jungle predation, codified by economic laws and principles. Advertising and salesmanship are the laws of economic predators. Advertisers use every legal or illegal device conceivable to snare customers and to sell unneeded products and services. False, misleading, deceptive, and exaggerated claims are constantly made in sales pitches, the purpose of which is the transfer of wealth from prey to predator.

— Gerald B. Lorentz  

And yet, Christians call this a Christian country. That is false. It may have Christians who have violated the separation of church and state, which convert people to their faith and threaten others who don't, but it is not a Christian nation. It is clearly based on Satanic principles.

"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen [Muslims]; and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."
— The Treaty of Tripoli: Ratified by the U.S. Senate in 1797.

Here are the differences between Capitalism and Christianity:

Love of Money: Capitalism often encourages the pursuit of financial success and the accumulation of wealth as a measure of success. However, Christianity cautions against the love of money and material possessions, emphasizing the importance of spiritual values, humility, and the well-being of others.Individualism vs. Community: Capitalism tends to promote individualism, where individuals are encouraged to pursue their self-interests and personal goals. Conversely, Christianity emphasizes community, compassion, and caring for others, teaching that individuals should love their neighbors and practice selflessness.Inequality vs. Equality: Capitalism can lead to economic disparities as wealth tends to concentrate in the hands of a few. In contrast, Christianity emphasizes the equality of all people in the eyes of God and calls for caring for the less fortunate and promoting social justice.Profit Maximization vs. Ethical Considerations: Capitalism's profit-driven nature can sometimes lead to ethical dilemmas, as businesses may prioritize financial gains over ethical and environmental concerns. Christianity emphasizes ethical behavior and calls for acting in ways that align with moral values and the teachings of Jesus.Materialism vs. Spiritual Values: Capitalism can foster materialistic tendencies, where the pursuit of material wealth and possessions becomes a central focus. Christianity encourages believers to focus on spiritual values, eternal life, and the pursuit of righteousness.Exploitation vs. Care for the Weak: If not properly regulated, capitalism can lead to the exploitation of workers and natural resources. Christianity calls for compassion and care for the vulnerable, urging believers to support the needy and protect the environment.Consumerism vs. Contentment: Capitalist societies often promote consumerism, encouraging people to constantly seek more and newer products. Christianity promotes contentment, encouraging believers to find joy and fulfillment in spiritual pursuits rather than material possessions.Satanic Holidays

Did you know that our major holidays come from the pagan calendar of Satanism and Witchcraft? Yes, that is what I said. Christians are just as clueless about the Sabbats of Witchcraft as they are about the Masonic symbols on their dollar bills.

Let's take a look at our main Satanic holidays. Notice how they represent Pagan Gods and Demons:

Halloween (Samhain): Halloween is the time of the shadow current of witchcraft cast by the (anti-Christian) demons Hecate and Lilith, marking the end of the harvest season and the beginning of winter. The Celts believed that during this time, the boundary between the living and the spirit world was thin, allowing spirits to cross over.

Note: Halloween is considered the most important holiday for Satanists. It's a time to celebrate individualism, embrace one's darker inclinations, and engage in rituals or activities that reflect personal desires. Does anyone want to explain why Christians would celebrate a prominent Satanic holiday?

Christmas (Yule): The Winter Solstice is the time that marks the death and rebirth of the Sun God. Yule also is the birthday of Mithras, the Sun God of Persia. The Church aligned the mythical birth of Christ with the Pagan Gods of old.Easter (Eostre): The term "Easter" originates not from Christianity but rather from Chalcedonian roots. Easter essentially represents Astarte, which is one of the designations for Beltis, recognized as the queen of heaven. As deciphered from the Assyrian artifacts by Layard, the name is Ishtar – symbolizing the devil or Satan. The Druids introduced this form of devil worship to the English populace, who engaged in devil veneration through their connection with nature.May Day (Beltane): Beltane, named after the Celtic Sun God Bel or Bal, has a dual meaning of "Bale" signifying banishment, evident in the bale fires ignited during the festival for cleansing. Virgin women sought blessings through fire jumps inducing altered states of consciousness useful for divination and insight.Valentine's Day (Lupercalia): Valentine's Day (like all Christian holidays) was originally derived from a pagan astrological and fertility rite centered around blood and offerings. This occasion was known as Lupercalia, stemming from the Latin term "Lupus," signifying "Wolf."The European Predators

When Christopher Columbus first visited Watlings Island in 1492, the Tainos Indians showered him with gifts which brought him to the confession: "So tractable, so peaceable, are these people that I swear to your Majesties there is not in the world a better nation. They love their neighbors as themselves, and their discourse is ever sweet and gentle and accompanied with a smile, though it is true that yet their manners are decorous and praiseworthy." they are naked."

I don't know if their "nakedness" pissed them off, but the Europeans proceeded to kick off the American dream by indoctrinating and exterminating the peaceful natives — now that's Capitalism.

"I don't know how to describe it . . . We could not walk without treading on the bodies and heads of dead Indians. The stench was so bad that no one could endure it."

— Bernal Diaz

Here's a list of the "Christian" principles the United States was founded on:

Massacre and Violence: The siege of Tenochtitlan involved intense fighting and brutal violence, resulting in the deaths of thousands of Aztec warriors and civilians.Enslavement: The Spanish conquistadors captured and enslaved Many surviving Aztec inhabitants. These individuals were subjected to forced labor, often under harsh conditions.Rape and Sexual Violence: There were numerous reports of Spanish soldiers engaging in sexual violence against Aztec women. Rape and sexual exploitation were unfortunately common during conquests.Pillage and Looting: After capturing Tenochtitlan, the Spanish, and their allies engaged in widespread looting of the city, stealing valuable artifacts, gold, and other resources.Destruction of Cultural Heritage: The Spanish sought to dismantle the religious and cultural practices of the Aztecs. Temples, shrines, and other important structures were destroyed or repurposed for Christian use.Forced Conversion: The Spanish imposed their religion, Christianity, on the Aztec population. Indigenous religious practices were suppressed, and many Aztecs were forcibly converted to Catholicism.Disease: European diseases, such as smallpox, spread rapidly among the Aztec population, leading to devastating epidemics. The lack of immunity resulted in a high death toll, further weakening the indigenous resistance.The Native America Predators

Human predators are human predators no matter their shape, color, or size. Before the Europeans invaded America, the Native Americans did what humans do best, slaughter each other. Their favorite gruesome skill was slicing off the scalps of their enemies.

Intertribal Warfare: Native American tribes engaged in intertribal conflicts over resources, territorial disputes, and cultural differences. Warfare was sometimes ritualistic, involving limited casualties, and intended to establish dominance rather than total annihilation.Raids and Counterraids: Some tribes engaged in raiding neighboring groups to acquire valuable resources, captives, or prestige items. Counterraids were often conducted as retaliatory measures or to restore honor.Sun Dance Torture: The Plains Indians, such as the Lakota, practiced the Sun Dance, a ritual that included voluntary acts of self-inflicted pain. Participants would fast, dance, and sometimes engage in acts like piercing their flesh or suspending themselves from poles by ropes attached to wooden skewers pierced through their chests. This was believed to demonstrate spiritual strength and connection.Warrior Societies and Scalping: Some tribes, like the Plains and Eastern Woodlands tribes, engaged in warfare to earn prestige and honor. Capturing enemy warriors or taking scalps in battle were considered valor and could enhance social status.Cannibalism in Warfare: Among certain tribes in the Pacific Northwest and the Eastern Woodlands, there are historical accounts of ritual cannibalism linked to warfare. This practice was often symbolic and intended to absorb the spiritual power of the defeated enemy.The United States of Satanism

"The history of the "peace-loving" United States has been one of violence and war. We are a violent society.  TV programs, movies, and novels must feature murder and violence to succeed. If they featured intellectual themes of philosophy and science, they would fail miserably. Man boasts of being a rational creature, but the facts prove that he is an irrational, predatory animal of violence."

— Gerald B. Lorentz 

Satanism and capitalism share similarities, particularly in their emphasis on individualism, personal empowerment, and pursuing personal desires. While they are distinct concepts with their philosophical foundations, there are points of alignment that define the American spirit:

Individualism: Both Satanism and capitalism emphasize the importance of the individual. Satanism encourages personal exploration, self-discovery, and the pursuit of one's own desires and ambitions. Similarly, capitalism strongly emphasizes individual autonomy, promoting the idea that individuals have the right to make choices that best suit their interests.Personal Empowerment: Satanism promotes self-empowerment and asserting one's own will. It encourages individuals to take control of their lives and not be beholden to external authorities. Capitalism, in its ideal form, allows individuals to shape their financial and economic destinies through their choices and efforts.Meritocracy: Both ideologies advocate for merit-based systems. In Satanism, personal accomplishments and strengths are celebrated, reflecting a form of spiritual meritocracy. Capitalism often operates on the principle that success is achieved through individual effort and merit, contributing to economic mobility.Freedom of Expression: Satanism values the freedom to express one's beliefs, even if they challenge societal norms. When functioning correctly, capitalism can provide a platform for diverse ideas and products to flourish, allowing individuals to express their creativity and innovation.Desire Fulfillment: Satanism encourages individuals to pursue their desires as long as they do not infringe upon the rights of others. Capitalism, in its consumer-driven aspect, seeks to satisfy people's desires by offering a wide array of products and services based on market demand.Entrepreneurial Spirit: Satanism and capitalism celebrate innovation and the drive to create something unique. Satanism encourages self-expression and individuality, qualities often associated with entrepreneurship in a capitalist framework.Critique of Authority: Both ideologies question traditional authority structures. Satanism often challenges religious and societal norms, while capitalism's proponents may critique excessive government intervention and advocate for free markets.The Final Irony

As you may have gathered from this article, Christianity and Satanism are predatory in their own ways. Satanism celebrates the human animal. More cunningly, Christianity masks its violence with false love and hypocritical moral standing. If you compare the violence in the Bible between Satan and Jehovah, you'll find the horrors of Jehovah overwhelmingly outnumbers the Devil's rebellious behavior.

For the sake of philosophical accuracy, the American Church of Satan by Anton Lavey states in its Bible that a Satanist should never, under any circumstances, harm a child or animal. Furthermore, they are atheists. They don't believe in a literal Devil or a spirit realm. It is a philosophy centered around the archetype of the rebel. Levay also made a point to call Satanists who sacrifice animals and commit crimes idiots. Lavey Satanism is a gentleman's intelligencia. This distinction separates them as a philosophy from nefarious uses of the archetype.

On the other hand, (and I wish I were making this up), Christianity is centered around the human sacrifice of God's son, who had to be tortured, so enough blood was spilled to appease His wrath against humanity. All for the sin of a woman who talked to a snake and ate an apple because she wanted to be as bright as her maker. The violence in Jehovah's old testament is comprised of the genocidal massacre of men, women, and children, along with rape, famine, infanticide, and a long list of human rights abuses.

Now, don't get me wrong. Most Christians I've met are highly ethical and generally good people. The problem lies with their ignorance. I don't think the world will become a better place with more religion. I believe humanity needs to wake up "as a species" and deal with reality on its own terms without the otherworldly storytime crutch.

So, where does this leave us? The world is not what people think it is. And the deeper you dig, the weirder it gets. Knowledge raises our awareness so we aren't living in the dark and may inspire us to act in a way that is grounded in reality rather than delusion.

Personally, I think that's good for the world . . . 

— Zzenn