Zzenn Loren's Blog, page 4

The Christian War Against Woman and Nature

The War on the Sacred Feminine: Christianity’s Long Campaign Against Women

Long before the iron cross cast its shadow over the earth, humanity lived under a different light—a softer, older sun that bathed the world in reverence for the sacred feminine. Across the fertile valleys of Old Europe, the highlands of Mesopotamia, and the forested groves of Celtic Gaul, matriarchal societies thrived for millennia. These were not utopias, but balanced worlds where the divine was understood not through domination, but through reciprocity, intuition, and communion with nature.

Women were central—spiritually, socially, and biologically. The goddess was not a metaphor but a living reality. She was the earth that bore fruit, the moon that bled with the tides, the womb through which life returned. These were cultures shaped around fertility, rhythm, and the sacred tree of life, its roots buried in the underworld and its branches touching the stars.

And then came the war.

From the Grove to the Gallows: How Matriarchy Was Buried

The ancient matriarchal societies—Minoan, Thracian, Druidic, Sumerian, and beyond—did not vanish through natural evolution. They were uprooted. The rise of patriarchal dominator cultures brought not just a shift in leadership or social norms, but a violent inversion of spiritual cosmology. What had been sacred became sinful. What had been natural became shameful.

The female body, once celebrated as a temple of creation, became the site of humanity’s fall. The myth of Eve eating the forbidden fruit was not a benign origin story—it was a weaponized metaphor. Taken from older pagan symbols, the Tree of Knowledge was originally the Tree of Life, a symbol of sacred wisdom revered by Druids and pagans across the ancient world. Inverting its meaning, the Christian Church portrayed this act not as awakening but as betrayal. The woman—curious, autonomous, and in communion with the serpent (a sacred symbol of renewal)—was turned into the origin of sin itself.

From that myth onward, the course was set: childbirth was no longer a miracle, but a punishment; the earth, no longer a mother, but a fallen world. And the woman? No longer the bearer of life, but the bearer of guilt.

Original Sin: The Desecration of Birth and the Body

The doctrine of Original Sin, one of Christianity’s foundational pillars, was a theological act of aggression. With Eve cast as the transgressor, all women were seen as her spiritual descendants—tainted, weak, and in need of male control. The very process of childbirth, once sacred and communal, was stained by association. Genesis 3:16 proclaimed: “In pain you shall bring forth children... your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you.”

This was no mere myth—it was a manifesto.

The Church seized on this story to justify centuries of female subjugation. Midwives were pushed aside by priests. Pregnancy became something to fear. The female body was reinterpreted as dangerous, unstable, and impure. Blood—so central to the cycles of life—was cast as unclean. And as Christianity spread, its priests—male, celibate, and alienated from the body—declared themselves the sole mediators between humanity and the divine.

Marriage as Control: The Chain of Obedience

With theology in hand, the Church set about reorganizing society. Marriage was redefined not as a union of souls, but a contract of subjugation. A woman’s duty was to obey her husband as the Church obeyed Christ. This hierarchy was divine, immutable, and ruthlessly enforced. Women could no longer inherit property in many regions. Their legal status was absorbed into their husbands. Their sexuality was regulated, their voices silenced.

Even Mary—the lone female figure venerated in Christianity—was stripped of her complexity. She was not celebrated as a sensual, powerful woman, but sanitized into a sexless, obedient vessel for divine will. The Virgin Mother replaced the many goddesses of old, not as an equal, but as a spiritual cage: the only “good woman” was the one who bore a son without ever having sex.

The Burning Times: Witch Hunts and the Inquisition

The Church’s war on women reached its blood-soaked zenith between the 14th and 17th centuries. The Inquisition, backed by both ecclesiastical and secular powers, targeted anyone who resisted orthodoxy—but especially women.

Midwives, herbalists, wise women—those who preserved the healing arts and spiritual knowledge of the pre-Christian world—were accused of witchcraft. Their crime? Knowing the ways of plants, cycles, the stars, and the body. Their fate? Torture, confession, and fire.

The Malleus Maleficarum (“Hammer of Witches”), written in 1486, became the Church’s handbook for female persecution. It proclaimed that women were more susceptible to demonic influence because of their “weaker faith” and “insatiable carnal desires.” It was not theology—it was terrorism.

Tens of thousands of women were executed in Europe under this logic. The very traits once honored in matriarchal societies—intuition, sensuality, communion with nature—were now punishable by death.

The Demonization of the Pagan Way

To cement control, the Church needed more than violence—it needed erasure. Pagan festivals were absorbed and Christianized. Temples to goddesses became churches to saints. The equinox and solstice were recast as Easter and Christmas. Ancient symbols were co-opted, inverted, or demonized.

The horned god of the forest became the devil. The serpent became Satan’s agent. The tree of life became the site of original sin. The drum, the moon, the circle—all sacred tools of the old religions—were rendered profane.

This wasn’t just religious conquest—it was cultural genocide.

Falling From Nature: Alienation as Doctrine

Christianity’s war on the feminine was also a war on nature itself. By casting the earth as “fallen,” it severed the spiritual bond between humans and the environment. The land was no longer sacred but cursed. Dominion replaced stewardship. The spiritual became abstract, male, and distant—God moved to the sky, and the earth was left behind.

This alienation paved the way for ecological devastation. The forests once revered were now resources to be exploited. Rivers were no longer spirits, but utilities. Women’s connection to nature—cyclical, embodied, intuitive—was feared and ridiculed.

By severing the feminine from the divine, the Church also severed humanity from the world it lived in.

Sin, Sex, and the Shame of the Body

Central to the Church’s power structure was the regulation of sexuality. Sex, once celebrated in ancient rites as a form of communion and creation, became synonymous with sin. Abstinence became purity. Desire became guilt.

Women bore the brunt of this repression. Their bodies were doubly cursed: first through Eve, then through Mary. They were taught that their sexuality was a danger to themselves and others. That their only holy role was submission.

In pagan cultures, sexuality was sacred—it was a rite of passage, a source of power, a celebration of life. The Church replaced that joy with fear. Masturbation became damnable. Homosexuality became heresy. Sensual pleasure was repressed, and celibacy was exalted.

It was a war not just on women’s power—but on the human body itself.

The Aftermath: A Wound Still Bleeding

Today, the echoes of this war persist. Women continue to battle for bodily autonomy. The earth still suffers from the legacy of dominion theology. The divine feminine, while rising again in feminist spirituality, remains marginalized in mainstream theology.

The Church’s war on women was never just metaphorical—it was material, historical, and devastating. It was a campaign to control reproduction, silence wisdom, and erase memory. It succeeded in building an empire, but at the cost of a profound disconnection from the sacred.

Reclaiming What Was Lost

Yet the sacred feminine endures—in the whispering of trees, the cycles of the moon, the blood that brings forth life. It flickers in forgotten myths, in feminist rituals, in the quiet rebellion of remembering. Though centuries of fire and doctrine tried to bury it, the earth remembers.

And so do we.

We stand now, not just at the end of an age, but at the cusp of a return—not to the past, but to a deeper truth. A truth where the feminine is no longer feared, but honored. Where the body is no longer shamed, but celebrated. Where the earth is not fallen, but sacred.

The war was long. The damage was great. But the roots run deep.

And the goddess—buried, burned, and banished—has never stopped dreaming through us.

— Zzenn

(AI Assisted)

The Fall of the Matriarchal Divine: Inversion and Subjugation

Long before the cross rose as a monolith over the Western world, the ancient earth pulsed with a reverence for the divine feminine. From the labyrinthine palaces of Minoan Crete to the mist-shrouded hills of Celtic Gaul, matriarchal societies wove their existence around goddesses of fertility, wisdom, and the living earth. Childbirth was not merely a biological act but a sacred rite, a woman’s power echoing the creative force of the cosmos. The earth itself was a mother—generous, vital, her rivers and fields a testament to abundance. Trees, such as the towering oak or the resilient yew, stood as conduits to eternity, their roots entwining the mortal with the divine. Into this tapestry of harmony strode the nascent Christian Church, its ambition cloaked in piety, its theology a blade that severed the old ways and inverted their holiest truths. Inspired by Helen Ellerbe’s The Dark Side of Christianity, we uncover a deliberate campaign—not of salvation, but of subjugation—that crushed the matriarchal divine and erected a patriarchal dominion upon its ruins.
The Sacred Order Before the Fall
In the matriarchal world, divinity was immanent, not distant. The Minoans danced before bull-horned altars, honoring a goddess whose serpentine arms cradled life’s cycles. The Celts gathered in sacred groves, their priestesses—the ban-drui—interpreting the whispers of wind and leaf. Across the Mediterranean and Northern Europe, societies flourished without the need for a singular, masculine deity. Women held spiritual and social authority, their roles as mothers, healers, and seers reflecting the goddess’s manifold aspects. The act of childbirth was a miracle of creation, a visceral communion with the eternal feminine. The earth, far from a mere resource, was a living entity—her seasons dictating rituals, her bounty shared rather than hoarded. Trees, revered as the Tree of Life in countless traditions, symbolized wisdom and continuity, their branches reaching skyward while their roots plumbed the mysteries below.
This was a world of balance, where humanity saw itself as part of nature, not its master. The divine feminine was not an abstraction but a presence felt in the swell of a pregnant belly, the rustle of leaves, the cool embrace of a river. Yet this equilibrium, so antithetical to the hierarchical ambitions of Rome and its Christian successors, became a target for annihilation.
The Inversion: From Reverence to Revulsion
When the Church extended its tendrils into these cultures, it did not merely supplant their beliefs—it inverted them, turning the sacred into the profane. Central to this upheaval was the doctrine of Original Sin, a theological cudgel that reshaped the matriarchal worldview. In the old ways, childbirth was the goddess incarnate, a woman’s body the vessel of life’s renewal. The Church, however, bound it to Eve’s mythic disobedience in Eden. Seduced by the serpent at the Tree of Knowledge, Eve became the scapegoat for humanity’s expulsion from paradise—an archetype of feminine weakness that justified male dominion. The Tree of Life, once a Druidic emblem of cosmic unity and wisdom, was recast as the source of temptation, its fruit the seed of sin. This inversion was not a mere reinterpretation; it was a calculated desecration, stripping the tree of its sanctity and aligning it with shame.
The earth suffered a parallel fate. Once a nurturing mother, revered as Gaia, Danu, or Nerthus, it was declared fallen—a corrupted realm tainted by Eve’s transgression. The Church taught that humanity must endure this degraded world, its beauty a fleeting illusion, its resources a means to an end rather than a gift to be cherished. The feminine divine, embodied in the land and its cycles, was subordinated to a masculine God whose will demanded obedience over reverence. Childbirth, too, was reframed as a curse, its pains a punishment rather than a passage to creation. Women, once priestesses and life-givers, were reduced to vessels of guilt, their bodies sites of sin rather than sanctity.
This theological sleight of hand was no accident. By demonizing the cornerstones of matriarchal spirituality—birth, earth, and the Tree of Life—the Church dismantled the power structures that sustained these societies. Sacred groves, where women once communed with the divine, were razed, their timber feeding the construction of cathedrals that exalted a male savior. The tithe replaced the communal harvest, redirecting the earth’s bounty to a clerical elite. The inversion was complete: what had been hallowed became heretical, and the feminine divine was buried beneath a doctrine of control.
Blood on the Altar: The Eradication of Resistance
The fall of the matriarchal divine was not a quiet surrender but a violent uprooting. As Christianity spread, first under Roman aegis and later as a power in its own right, it waged a relentless campaign against those who clung to the old ways. The Druids, guardians of Celtic lore and the natural order, faced slaughter as Roman legions, newly emboldened by Christian zeal after Constantine’s conversion in 312 CE, torched their sacred oaks. These keepers of oral traditions, who saw divinity in the rustling leaves and the turning seasons, were branded pagans, their wisdom extinguished in flames. The Church could not tolerate a spirituality so rooted in the earth, so defiant of centralized authority.
The Gnostics, too, fell to this purge. Their esoteric texts—such as the Gospel of Mary Magdalene, which dared to elevate a woman’s voice above the apostolic chorus—offered a vision of divinity that rejected the Church’s singular, masculine God. Bishops like Irenaeus, wielding orthodoxy as a weapon, hunted these sects, burying their scrolls in desert caches or consigning them to the fire. The Essenes, ascetic Jews whose communal ethos may have influenced early Christian ideals, vanished from history—whether absorbed into the Church’s fold or eradicated for their refusal to bow to a hierarchical creed remains unclear. Their disappearance, like that of the Druids and Gnostics, marked the silencing of alternatives to the Church’s narrative.
The Middle Ages brought this violence to a gruesome crescendo in the Inquisition. Women, often healers, midwives, or herbalists—vestiges of matriarchal knowledge—were branded witches, their intimacy with the earth twisted into evidence of devilry. Between the 14th and 17th centuries, tens of thousands perished at the stake, their deaths orchestrated as public spectacles to instill terror. The Malleus Maleficarum, a 1486 treatise endorsed by the Church, codified this misogyny, framing women as inherently susceptible to sin—a legacy of Eve’s fall. The Inquisition was not merely a war on heresy but a final assault on the matriarchal divine, ensuring that no remnant of its power could challenge the Church’s dominion.
The Architects of Subjugation
This systematic inversion and eradication served a singular purpose: control. The Church Fathers, from Tertullian to Augustine, understood that a matriarchal worldview—decentralized, egalitarian, and earth-bound—threatened their vision of a unified, patriarchal religion. By crafting a theology that placed a male God at the apex, mediated by a male clergy, they engineered a hierarchy that demanded submission. The figure of Jesus, whether historical or fabricated, became the fulcrum of this shift—a savior whose sacrifice redeemed a fallen world, but only through obedience to his earthly representatives. Ellerbe argues that this narrative, unsupported by contemporary evidence,
was a malleable tool, its ambiguity allowing the Church to adapt and conquer across cultures.The matriarchal divine, with its emphasis on communal harmony and feminine agency, stood in stark opposition to this agenda. Its inversion was not a theological evolution but a political necessity, enabling the Church to subsume Rome’s imperial ambitions and extend them globally. From the ashes of sacred groves and the blood of “witches” rose a patriarchal empire, its cross a symbol not of liberation but of conquest.
Echoes in the Ashes
Today, the legacy of this fall reverberates. The sacred feminine lies entombed beneath layers of dogma, its voice a faint murmur in feminist theology or neo-pagan revivals. The earth, stripped of its divinity, groans under exploitation justified by a “fallen” worldview—its forests felled, its rivers dammed, its sanctity reduced to a commodity. The Druids’ oaks, the Gnostics’ scrolls, the witches’ hearths—all echo in the margins, their truths drowned by centuries of orthodoxy.
Ellerbe’s The Dark Side of Christianity compels us to confront this inversion—not as a distant history, but as a living wound. The matriarchal divine was not merely subjugated; it was inverted to serve a system that thrives on disconnection—from the earth, from each other, from the feminine power that once sustained us. Can we reclaim what was lost? Perhaps not in its original form, for time and fire have claimed too much. Yet in the act of questioning—of peeling back the Church’s mythos to reveal the blood beneath—we may yet hear the earth’s pulse, feel the tree’s wisdom, and honor the miracle of birth anew. The shadow of the cross looms large, but its roots are shallow compared to the deep, enduring soil it sought to bury.

— Zzenn

AI Edited

Why 600,000 Said Nothing About Jesus – What History Reveals

The Smoking Gun Exposed

During the supposed lifetime of Jesus (the most famous figure in history) Jerusalem and Judea had approximately 100,000 residents. Yet only three historians—Josephus, Tacitus, and Pliny the Younger made brief references and entirely omit the earthquake and resurrection of saints who walked into the city at his crucifixion—a literal zombie apocalypse. There is not one mention of these events in Roman records, not even his trial and conviction.

The Jesus of Christianity—miracle worker, zombie-raiser, storm-stiller, and ultimate savior—is an astonishingly convenient figure for religious dogma but astonishingly absent from history. For far too long, humanity has tiptoed around the gaping black hole of historical evidence surrounding this god-man. This article will present the smoking gun that exposes the Jesus story concocted by the Christian church.

Miraculous Claims and Population Context

First, consider the sheer scale of the supposed miracles. We are told this Jesus—a humble carpenter turned cosmic superstar—healed the blind, raised the dead, fed thousands from a loaf of bread, and strolled effortlessly across stormy seas, cast demons out of the afflicted, went into the temple and beat merchants with a whip, road into Jerusalem on a donkey to a massive cheering crowd, and yet, there's no mention of him from all but 3 historians out of 600,000 residents.

Judea had approximately 500,000 to 600,000 inhabitants.

Jerusalem alone was bustling with 25,000 to 80,000 gossip-prone residents.

Given this population and their reliance on oral storytelling, news of such extraordinary events would spread faster than wildfire. And yet, silence. The historical record is shockingly quiet, as if the entire population simply shrugged off divine fireworks and undead parades.

Check out the article: Why the Romans’ Meticulous Records Expose Jesus

The Crucifixion Scenario: The Ultimate Historical Black Hole

Then, there's the dramatic crucifixion scenario. According to scripture, when Jesus died, the earth shook violently, darkness covered the land, and graves opened, releasing risen saints into the streets of Jerusalem—a first-century zombie apocalypse, no less. Imagine the chaos, terror, and awe of such an event. Yet, history remains absurdly mute. The meticulous Romans, obsessive record-keepers who chronicled the mundane daily operations of their empire, recorded precisely zero of these phenomenal events. Pontius Pilate, a Roman governor whose career hinged upon maintaining order, conveniently neglected to mention an earth-shaking execution that literally resurrected corpses.

Sparse and Late Historical Mentions

Yes, three figures—Josephus, Tacitus, and Pliny the Younger—mention a character named Jesus. But these mentions are so brief, ambiguous, and suspiciously late that scholars seriously debate their authenticity. None speak of supernatural earthquakes or walking corpses. Their silence is deafening proof of something extremely fishy going on here. Are we seriously expected to believe that a figure capable of reshaping reality itself went unnoticed except for fleeting references decades after his alleged death?

Gospel Accounts: Late and Anonymous

Consider the earliest Christian writings—the gospels—crafted between 70 to 100 years after Jesus supposedly lived. None were penned by eyewitnesses. The authors were anonymous religious enthusiasts, cobbling together recycled myths from older pagan religions like Mithraism, Egyptian Osiris traditions, and Dionysian mystery cults. Virgin birth? Check. Resurrection after three days? Check. Miraculous deeds? Check. The Jesus narrative is a recycled script, an ancient reboot designed to enthrall masses and enforce control.

Archaeological Evidence: A Deafening Silence

The archaeological record offers no solace for believers either. Not one verifiable artifact has ever surfaced confirming the existence of this remarkable figure. If this were any other historical claim—any claim at all—it would be dismissed outright due to lack of evidence. Yet billions cling to this mythical narrative with unwavering conviction, proving human beings' endless capacity to ignore reality in favor of comforting fantasies.

Conclusion: Permission to Question Reality

The brutal truth is simple: Jesus, as portrayed by Christianity, did not historically exist. The lack of contemporary records, eyewitness accounts, archaeological finds, and historical consistency leaves us facing an inescapable conclusion. The Jesus myth is the greatest story ever sold, carefully constructed by religious leaders to harness human fears and desires for hope, redemption, and eternal life.

It's time to reclaim intellectual honesty and permission to question reality. Jesus, the mythological superstar of Christianity, is little more than an ancient narrative invention—a product of human imagination crafted by priests and kings to control the masses and dictate morality. And the only thing more astonishing than this mythical character's supposed miracles is the human capacity to believe such a profound, transparent fiction for so long.

Give yourself permission to be human—permission to think, doubt, question, and challenge the comforting lies fed to us for centuries. After all, reality, however unsettling, is far more liberating than ancient stories concocted to keep humanity bound to invisible chains.

600,000 Said Nothing About Jesus – What History Reveals

The Smoking Gun Exposed

During the supposed lifetime of Jesus (the most famous figure in history) Jerusalem and Judea had approximately 100,000 residents. Yet only three historians—Josephus, Tacitus, and Pliny the Younger made brief references and entirely omit the earthquake and resurrection of saints who walked into the city at his crucifixion—a literal zombie apocalypse. There is not one mention of these events in Roman records, not even his trial and conviction.

The Jesus of Christianity—miracle worker, zombie-raiser, storm-stiller, and ultimate savior—is an astonishingly convenient figure for religious dogma but astonishingly absent from history. For far too long, humanity has tiptoed around the gaping black hole of historical evidence surrounding this god-man. This article will present the smoking gun that exposes the Jesus story concocted by the Christian church.

Miraculous Claims and Population Context

First, consider the sheer scale of the supposed miracles. We are told this Jesus—a humble carpenter turned cosmic superstar—healed the blind, raised the dead, fed thousands from a loaf of bread, and strolled effortlessly across stormy seas, cast demons out of the afflicted, went into the temple and beat merchants with a whip, road into Jerusalem on a donkey to a massive cheering crowd, and yet, there's no mention of him from all but 3 historians out of 600,000 residents.

Judea had approximately 500,000 to 600,000 inhabitants.

Jerusalem alone was bustling with 25,000 to 80,000 gossip-prone residents.

Given this population and their reliance on oral storytelling, news of such extraordinary events would spread faster than wildfire. And yet, silence. The historical record is shockingly quiet, as if the entire population simply shrugged off divine fireworks and undead parades.

Check out the article: Why the Romans’ Meticulous Records Expose Jesus

The Crucifixion Scenario: The Ultimate Historical Black Hole

Then, there's the dramatic crucifixion scenario. According to scripture, when Jesus died, the earth shook violently, darkness covered the land, and graves opened, releasing risen saints into the streets of Jerusalem—a first-century zombie apocalypse, no less. Imagine the chaos, terror, and awe of such an event. Yet, history remains absurdly mute. The meticulous Romans, obsessive record-keepers who chronicled the mundane daily operations of their empire, recorded precisely zero of these phenomenal events. Pontius Pilate, a Roman governor whose career hinged upon maintaining order, conveniently neglected to mention an earth-shaking execution that literally resurrected corpses.

Sparse and Late Historical Mentions

Yes, three figures—Josephus, Tacitus, and Pliny the Younger—mention a character named Jesus. But these mentions are so brief, ambiguous, and suspiciously late that scholars seriously debate their authenticity. None speak of supernatural earthquakes or walking corpses. Their silence is deafening proof of something extremely fishy going on here. Are we seriously expected to believe that a figure capable of reshaping reality itself went unnoticed except for fleeting references decades after his alleged death?

Gospel Accounts: Late and Anonymous

Consider the earliest Christian writings—the gospels—crafted between 70 to 100 years after Jesus supposedly lived. None were penned by eyewitnesses. The authors were anonymous religious enthusiasts, cobbling together recycled myths from older pagan religions like Mithraism, Egyptian Osiris traditions, and Dionysian mystery cults. Virgin birth? Check. Resurrection after three days? Check. Miraculous deeds? Check. The Jesus narrative is a recycled script, an ancient reboot designed to enthrall masses and enforce control.

Archaeological Evidence: A Deafening Silence

The archaeological record offers no solace for believers either. Not one verifiable artifact has ever surfaced confirming the existence of this remarkable figure. If this were any other historical claim—any claim at all—it would be dismissed outright due to lack of evidence. Yet billions cling to this mythical narrative with unwavering conviction, proving human beings' endless capacity to ignore reality in favor of comforting fantasies.

Conclusion: Permission to Question Reality

The brutal truth is simple: Jesus, as portrayed by Christianity, did not historically exist. The lack of contemporary records, eyewitness accounts, archaeological finds, and historical consistency leaves us facing an inescapable conclusion. The Jesus myth is the greatest story ever sold, carefully constructed by religious leaders to harness human fears and desires for hope, redemption, and eternal life.

It's time to reclaim intellectual honesty and permission to question reality. Jesus, the mythological superstar of Christianity, is little more than an ancient narrative invention—a product of human imagination crafted by priests and kings to control the masses and dictate morality. And the only thing more astonishing than this mythical character's supposed miracles is the human capacity to believe such a profound, transparent fiction for so long.

Give yourself permission to be human—permission to think, doubt, question, and challenge the comforting lies fed to us for centuries. After all, reality, however unsettling, is far more liberating than ancient stories concocted to keep humanity bound to invisible chains.

600,000 People Said Nothing About Jesus | Christianity Debunked

The Smoking Gun Exposed

During the supposed lifetime of Jesus (the most famous figure in history) Jerusalem and Judea had approximately 100,000 residents. Yet only three historians—Josephus, Tacitus, and Pliny the Younger made brief references and entirely omit the earthquake and resurrection of saints who walked into the city at his crucifixion—a literal zombie apocalypse. There is not one mention of these events in Roman records, not even his trial and conviction.

The Jesus of Christianity—miracle worker, zombie-raiser, storm-stiller, and ultimate savior—is an astonishingly convenient figure for religious dogma but astonishingly absent from history. For far too long, humanity has tiptoed around the gaping black hole of historical evidence surrounding this god-man. This article will present the smoking gun that exposes the Jesus story concocted by the Christian church.

Miraculous Claims and Population Context

First, consider the sheer scale of the supposed miracles. We are told this Jesus—a humble carpenter turned cosmic superstar—healed the blind, raised the dead, fed thousands from a loaf of bread, and strolled effortlessly across stormy seas, cast demons out of the afflicted, went into the temple and beat merchants with a whip, road into Jerusalem on a donkey to a massive cheering crowd, and yet, there's no mention of him from all but 3 historians out of 600,000 residents.

Judea had approximately 500,000 to 600,000 inhabitants.

Jerusalem alone was bustling with 25,000 to 80,000 gossip-prone residents.

Given this population and their reliance on oral storytelling, news of such extraordinary events would spread faster than wildfire. And yet, silence. The historical record is shockingly quiet, as if the entire population simply shrugged off divine fireworks and undead parades.

The Crucifixion Scenario: The Ultimate Historical Black Hole

Then, there's the dramatic crucifixion scenario. According to scripture, when Jesus died, the earth shook violently, darkness covered the land, and graves opened, releasing risen saints into the streets of Jerusalem—a first-century zombie apocalypse, no less. Imagine the chaos, terror, and awe of such an event. Yet, history remains absurdly mute. The meticulous Romans, obsessive record-keepers who chronicled the mundane daily operations of their empire, recorded precisely zero of these phenomenal events. Pontius Pilate, a Roman governor whose career hinged upon maintaining order, conveniently neglected to mention an earth-shaking execution that literally resurrected corpses.

Sparse and Late Historical Mentions

Yes, three figures—Josephus, Tacitus, and Pliny the Younger—mention a character named Jesus. But these mentions are so brief, ambiguous, and suspiciously late that scholars seriously debate their authenticity. None speak of supernatural earthquakes or walking corpses. Their silence is deafening proof of something extremely fishy going on here. Are we seriously expected to believe that a figure capable of reshaping reality itself went unnoticed except for fleeting references decades after his alleged death?

Gospel Accounts: Late and Anonymous

Consider the earliest Christian writings—the gospels—crafted between 70 to 100 years after Jesus supposedly lived. None were penned by eyewitnesses. The authors were anonymous religious enthusiasts, cobbling together recycled myths from older pagan religions like Mithraism, Egyptian Osiris traditions, and Dionysian mystery cults. Virgin birth? Check. Resurrection after three days? Check. Miraculous deeds? Check. The Jesus narrative is a recycled script, an ancient reboot designed to enthrall masses and enforce control.

Archaeological Evidence: A Deafening Silence

The archaeological record offers no solace for believers either. Not one verifiable artifact has ever surfaced confirming the existence of this remarkable figure. If this were any other historical claim—any claim at all—it would be dismissed outright due to lack of evidence. Yet billions cling to this mythical narrative with unwavering conviction, proving human beings' endless capacity to ignore reality in favor of comforting fantasies.

Conclusion: Permission to Question Reality

The brutal truth is simple: Jesus, as portrayed by Christianity, did not historically exist. The lack of contemporary records, eyewitness accounts, archaeological finds, and historical consistency leaves us facing an inescapable conclusion. The Jesus myth is the greatest story ever sold, carefully constructed by religious leaders to harness human fears and desires for hope, redemption, and eternal life.

It's time to reclaim intellectual honesty and permission to question reality. Jesus, the mythological superstar of Christianity, is little more than an ancient narrative invention—a product of human imagination crafted by priests and kings to control the masses and dictate morality. And the only thing more astonishing than this mythical character's supposed miracles is the human capacity to believe such a profound, transparent fiction for so long.

Give yourself permission to be human—permission to think, doubt, question, and challenge the comforting lies fed to us for centuries. After all, reality, however unsettling, is far more liberating than ancient stories concocted to keep humanity bound to invisible chains.

— Zzenn

(AI Assisted)

Christianity Exposed: The Shocking Truth Revealed

The Jesus of Christianity—miracle worker, zombie-raiser, storm-stiller, and ultimate savior—is an astonishingly convenient figure for religious dogma but astonishingly absent from history. For far too long, humanity has tiptoed around the gaping black hole of historical evidence surrounding this god-man. This article will present the smoking gun that exposes the Jesus story concocted by the Christian church.

First, consider the sheer scale of the supposed miracles. We are told this Jesus—a humble carpenter turned cosmic superstar—healed the blind, raised the dead, fed thousands from virtually nothing, and strolled effortlessly across stormy seas. In a region like Judea, with approximately 50,000 to 100,000 gossip-prone inhabitants (and Jerusalem alone bustling with 20,000 to 30,000 people), this news would spread faster than wildfire. And yet, silence. The historical record is shockingly quiet, as if the entire population simply shrugged off divine fireworks and undead parades.

Then, there's the dramatic crucifixion scenario. According to scripture, when Jesus died, the earth shook violently, darkness covered the land, and graves opened, releasing risen saints into the streets of Jerusalem—a first-century zombie apocalypse, no less. Imagine the chaos, terror, and awe of such an event. Yet, history remains absurdly mute. The meticulous Romans, obsessive record-keepers who chronicled the mundane daily operations of their empire, recorded precisely zero of these phenomenal events. Pontius Pilate, a Roman governor whose career hinged upon maintaining order, conveniently neglected to mention an earth-shaking execution that literally resurrected corpses.

Yes, three figures—Josephus, Tacitus, and Pliny the Younger—mention a character named Jesus. But these mentions are so brief, ambiguous, and suspiciously late that scholars seriously debate their authenticity. None speak of supernatural earthquakes or walking corpses. Their silence is deafening proof of something extremely fishy going on here. Are we seriously expected to believe that a figure capable of reshaping reality itself went unnoticed except for fleeting references decades after his alleged death?

And consider the earliest Christian writings—the gospels—crafted between 70 to 100 years after Jesus supposedly lived. None were penned by eyewitnesses. The authors were anonymous religious enthusiasts, cobbling together recycled myths from older pagan religions like Mithraism, Egyptian Osiris traditions, and Dionysian mystery cults. Virgin birth? Check. Resurrection after three days? Check. Miraculous deeds? Check. The Jesus narrative is a recycled script, an ancient reboot designed to enthrall masses and enforce control.

The archaeological record offers no solace for believers either. Not one verifiable artifact has ever surfaced confirming the existence of this remarkable figure. If this were any other historical claim—any claim at all—it would be dismissed outright due to lack of evidence. Yet billions cling to this mythical narrative with unwavering conviction, proving human beings' endless capacity to ignore reality in favor of comforting fantasies.

The brutal truth is simple: Jesus, as portrayed by Christianity, did not historically exist. The lack of contemporary records, eyewitness accounts, archaeological finds, and historical consistency leaves us facing an inescapable conclusion. The Jesus myth is the greatest story ever sold, carefully constructed by religious leaders to harness human fears and desires for hope, redemption, and eternal life.

It's time to reclaim intellectual honesty and permission to question reality. Jesus, the mythological superstar of Christianity, is little more than an ancient narrative invention—a product of human imagination crafted by priests and kings to control the masses and dictate morality. And the only thing more astonishing than this mythical character's supposed miracles is the human capacity to believe such a profound, transparent fiction for so long.

Give yourself permission to be human—permission to think, doubt, question, and challenge the comforting lies fed to us for centuries. After all, reality, however unsettling, is far more liberating than ancient stories concocted to keep humanity bound to invisible chains.

— Zzenn

The Christian Sins of Andrew Wilson: Hypocrisy Exposed

 

They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act. Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou? This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not. So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.

- John 8Virtue Signalling in the Shadow of a Violent Faith

Andrew Wilson wields his orthodoxy like a weapon, pointing fingers at those he deems immoral while conveniently ignoring the moral contradictions of his own faith tradition. It’s not just his personal hypocrisies—his defense of smoking and drinking, his self-righteous labeling of women as “prostitutes,” or his selective application of scripture—it’s the staggering weight of the Orthodox Christian Bible and the bloody legacy of the Church that underscores the double standards he lives by.

A Bible of Blood and Absurdity

Andrew often positions himself as a defender of biblical truth, yet he seems unwilling to confront the glaring contradictions and violent narratives that saturate the very text he upholds. This is a book where Jehovah commands child genocide (1 Samuel 15:3), condones slavery (Exodus 21:2-6), and rains destruction upon entire cities without hesitation. It’s a book that tells us Jonah survived in the belly of a whale, Balaam’s donkey spoke, and a global flood carried Noah and his magical ark full of every species on Earth.

And then there’s the resurrection of Jesus, accompanied by a zombie apocalypse—graves opening, saints rising, and walking into Jerusalem (Matthew 27:51-53). These stories, taken literally, require a suspension of disbelief that borders on the absurd. Yet Andrew clings to them as the foundation of his moral authority while simultaneously using them to condemn others for their supposed irrationality or lack of faith.

If Andrew is so quick to critique the lives of OnlyFans models or dismiss others as sinners, perhaps he should pause to examine the scripture he cites as his guide. How does one reconcile the moral teachings of Jesus with the barbaric commands of the Old Testament God? How does one preach love and forgiveness while ignoring the blood-soaked pages of their holy book?

The Church’s Bloody Legacy

Beyond the Bible’s contradictions lies the violent history of the Catholic Church—a legacy that Andrew and his wife Rachel conveniently overlook while passing judgment on others. The Crusades, driven by religious zeal, saw the slaughter of countless innocents in the name of Christ. The Inquisition tortured and executed those who dared to think differently. The colonization of the Americas—often justified by Christian missionaries—resulted in the largest genocide in human history, the destruction of Native American cultures, and the enslavement of entire peoples.

These atrocities aren’t ancient history; they are the foundation of the institution Andrew claims to defend. How can one preach purity, morality, and judgment when their faith’s history is soaked in blood and hypocrisy?

Pointing Fingers with Dirty Hands

For all their outward piety, Andrew and Rachel Wilson embody the very contradictions they claim to stand against. They sit on their moral high horse, condemning others for their choices, while the ground beneath them is unstable and riddled with hypocrisy. They point fingers at women, at secular culture, at anyone who doesn’t align with their narrow worldview, while ignoring the glaring flaws in their own lives and beliefs.

Their orthodoxy is not a beacon of light but a smokescreen, masking their inability to grapple with the inconsistencies of their faith and the violence of its history. They demand accountability from others without offering it themselves, weaponizing scripture to condemn rather than to heal, to judge rather than to love.

Clean Your Own House

If Andrew and Rachel Wilson truly wish to be examples of Christian morality, they would do well to heed the words of Jesus: “First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye” (Matthew 7:5).

Before calling women "prostitutes," Andrew might reflect on the violence and contradictions within the Bible he defends. Before condemning the sins of others, he might consider the legacy of the Church he represents—a legacy of crusades, inquisitions, and colonization. Before justifying his own vices, he might ponder the example he sets for his children and the faith community he claims to lead.

True morality isn’t found in pointing fingers or clinging to outdated dogma. It’s found in humility, in self-reflection, in the courage to admit when you’ve fallen short. Until Andrew and Rachel Wilson learn this lesson, their judgments will remain as hollow as the ancient texts they twist to justify their pride. And as long as they refuse to confront their own contradictions, they will remain what they claim to despise: hypocrites cloaked in the guise of righteousness.

Andrew’s Stones: A Pharisee in the Digital Age

Andrew Wilson’s disdain for nuance has never been more evident than in his treatment of women on the Whatever podcast, particularly his dismissal of OnlyFans models as "prostitutes." The label is harsh, reductive, and a glaring contradiction to the faith he claims to uphold. It’s not the critique itself that is shocking—it’s the self-righteousness, the casual cruelty disguised as moral authority, that reveals the deeper hypocrisy at play.

"Cast the First Stone": Forgotten Faith

For a man who wears his Catholicism on his sleeve, Andrew seems to have a selective memory when it comes to the teachings of Christ. His words recall the scene in John 8, where Jesus confronts a crowd ready to stone a woman accused of adultery. "He who is without sin, cast the first stone," Jesus says, diffusing the mob and offering the woman grace rather than judgment.

Of course Andrew focuses on the "go and sin no more" part to justify his heathen attitude. How about stop sinning against the temple of the holy spirit and "go and smoke no more."

Andrew, however, prefers to wield his stones with precision. By calling OnlyFans models "prostitutes," he reduces them to a single aspect of their lives, ignoring their humanity and their capacity for growth and redemption. It’s a move that echoes the very Pharisees Jesus rebuked—a fixation on sin without the humility to examine one’s own shortcomings.

The Double Standard

The irony of Andrew’s stance lies in his own life’s contradictions. He justifies his vices—smoking, drinking, and a penchant for self-aggrandizing debates—while condemning others for theirs. He insists on moral purity from women whose circumstances he knows nothing about, all while excusing behaviors in himself that poison his body, harm his family, and contradict his faith.

Catholicism teaches compassion for the sinner, not condemnation. Yet Andrew’s rhetoric is not one of invitation or understanding; it’s one of exclusion and judgment. By labeling these women as "prostitutes," he assumes a position of moral superiority that Christ himself rejected.

A Misuse of the Platform

Podcasts like Whatever have become modern-day coliseums, where debates are less about truth and more about spectacle. Andrew thrives in this environment, turning theological discussions into a form of intellectual combat. But his approach to the OnlyFans models wasn’t about theology—it was about control, about asserting dominance over women whose choices he finds offensive.

This isn’t the behavior of a man following Christ’s example. Jesus met people where they were—tax collectors, prostitutes, and outcasts alike—and offered them a path to transformation through love, not condemnation. Andrew’s approach is the opposite: he meets people where they are, then builds a wall around them, ensuring they feel unworthy of the faith he claims to represent.

The Real Sin

In calling these women "prostitutes," Andrew commits a greater sin than the one he accuses them of. He dehumanizes them, reducing their worth to a single choice or career. He forgets that Christianity is a faith of redemption, not exclusion, where even those society casts aside are offered a seat at the table.

And while Andrew’s faith gives him the right to hold moral convictions, it does not give him the right to wield them as weapons. His words betray a lack of understanding—or perhaps a lack of willingness to understand—the complexity of human lives. They reveal a man more concerned with being right than with being good.

The Theology of Excuses

Andrew’s defense of his smoking and drinking habits is almost poetic in its audacity. He compares the habitual intake of nicotine and alcohol to eating a Big Mac from McDonald’s as if a late-night indulgence in fast food holds the same weight as inhaling cancer-causing chemicals or pouring ethanol into his bloodstream. The comparison feels less like a theological argument and more like a desperate attempt to justify what he knows, deep down, doesn’t add up.

He argues that his choices don’t harm his relationship with God, framing them as harmless personal preferences rather than sins. But this defense, cloaked in pseudo-philosophy, crumbles under the weight of scripture. If the body is truly the temple of the Holy Spirit, as 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 states, then what does it say about a man who willingly poisons that temple?

A Father’s Gamble

Andrew’s excuses might be easier to swallow if they didn’t have such high stakes. Every cigarette he lights, every drink he pours, chips away at the future he claims to protect. Cancer doesn’t care about theological arguments, and addiction doesn’t negotiate. His habits don’t just threaten his own life—they threaten his children’s futures.

Imagine them fatherless, left to pick up the pieces of a legacy shattered by choices he stubbornly refuses to confront. It’s a cruel irony for a man who champions the family unit as a cornerstone of his faith. How can he claim to guard the spiritual health of his household while undermining its very foundation with every drag and every sip?

He could be considered the leader of the "Christian Smokers Club." Faithful Andrew minions defend smoking on social media like programmed cult members. In what universe does smoking and Christianity mix? This is why I say religion dumbs people down. 

The Pharisee Paradox

The real tragedy isn’t just the smoking or the drinking—it’s the hypocrisy. Andrew’s critics call him out regularly, pointing to the glaring contradiction between his moral sermons and his personal behavior. And yet, his response is predictable: deflection. He casts his accusers as judgmental, Pharisaical, missing the “real” message of grace. But isn’t that exactly what he does to others, wielding judgment with the zeal of a modern-day inquisitor?

Andrew’s public debates and social media interactions are saturated with this same sanctimonious energy. He condemns others for their sins, often with a tone so condescending it feels less like correction and more like a spectacle. Yet when the spotlight turns toward him, he twists the narrative, presenting himself as misunderstood—a victim of overly harsh criticism.

The Poisoned Temple

For all his theological posturing, Andrew seems to ignore the simplest truth: his habits are a slow poison, both physically and spiritually. Smoking and drinking may not be explicitly listed as sins in the Bible, but their consequences—addiction, disease, and the potential to devastate loved ones—are unmistakable. They dishonor the temple God entrusted him with, a direct violation of the faith he claims to defend.

More troubling, though, is the example he sets. By publicly justifying these vices, Andrew normalizes behavior that contradicts the call to live as a light in the world. It’s not just about him anymore—it’s about the ripple effects of his choices on those who look to him as a leader.

A Legacy of Denial

Andrew Wilson’s contradictions aren’t unique, but they are telling. His life is a reminder of the danger of living in two worlds—one where you hold others to the highest standards and another where you excuse yourself from the same scrutiny. The problem isn’t just his smoking or drinking; it’s the pride that blinds him to the hypocrisy of his actions.

If Andrew wants to be taken seriously as a leader, he’ll need to confront these contradictions head-on. He’ll need to stop hiding behind clever analogies and theological loopholes, and instead face the reality of his choices. Because until he does, his words will always ring hollow—a temple of contradictions collapsing under the weight of its own hypocrisy.

And for someone so concerned with the sins of others, perhaps it’s time for Andrew to put down the cigarette, pour out the drink, and take a long, hard look in the mirror.

But Why Stop Here?Brace Yourself, Here Comes Team Pharisee

In a world that thrives on spectacle, this article would not be complete without the recent drama (the lifeblood of The Crucible) involving Andrew and his wife Rachel wielding their faith like a gavel in the court of public opinion upon their target Nala Ray. This former OnlyFans model recently converted to Christianity. And to the amusement of the onlookers, their carefully curated personas of moral authority began to unravel. What unfolded next was a case study in hypocrisy, misrepresentation, and the un-Christlike behavior that has come to define much of the modern-day religious elite.

The Setup: Redemption vs. Reputation

Nala’s appearance on the Whatever podcast was raw, vulnerable, and honest. She spoke of her journey from an industry stigmatized by many to embracing the light of Christianity. Hers wasn’t a polished narrative, but then again, neither were the stories of the apostles or the sinners Christ himself welcomed into his fold. She didn’t claim perfection—she claimed grace.

But for Andrew and Rachel Wilson, along with Pearl Davis, her words were ammunition. Instead of hearing testimony of transformation, they heard an opportunity to point fingers, to uphold their version of the "ideal Christian" by tearing down someone whose story was still unfolding. On social media and in subsequent discussions, they accused Nala of lying about her faith, twisting her words into a narrative of deceit.

Enter Michael Knowles: A Voice of Reason

Michael Knowles, a political and cultural analyst who interviewed Nala after her conversation, stepped into the fray with surprising clarity. He defended Nala, calling out the Wilsons and Pearl Davis for their blatant misrepresentation of her testimony. Knowles didn’t mince words: the Wilsons’ actions, he argued, were not only uncharitable but also antithetical to the core tenets of Christianity.

Knowles highlighted an uncomfortable truth for the Wilsons—Nala’s story isn’t a liability to the faith; it’s the point of the faith. Christianity isn’t a club for the righteous; it’s a hospital for the broken. And by publicly accusing Nala, they were doing what Pharisees have done for centuries: policing the gate while missing the heart of the Gospel.

The Wilson Paradox

The irony is almost too rich. Andrew and Rachel Wilson, self-styled defenders of Catholic morality, are no strangers to controversy themselves. Rachel’s own personal history—multiple marriages, children out of wedlock—stands as a glaring contradiction to the very values they claim to uphold. Yet instead of allowing their own imperfections to foster empathy, they’ve turned their faith into a weapon, using it to attack those whose stories don’t align with their sanitized narrative of redemption.

Their social media interactions and debates drip with a condescension that belies their supposed commitment to Christ-like humility. They don’t just disagree; they belittle. They don’t just critique; they condemn. And they do it all under the guise of "theological discourse," as if a sharper intellect can justify a crueler tongue.

The Hypocrisy of Public Gossip

Gossip is a sin the Bible explicitly condemns, yet the Wilsons seem to wield it with the same sanctimony as their theological critiques. Taking Nala’s words out of context, spreading accusations, and using their platforms to publicly shame her isn’t just unkind—it’s unethical. For people who claim to be devout Catholics, this behavior raises the question: Who exactly are they serving?

Is it Christ, who dined with tax collectors and defended the woman caught in adultery? Or is it their own egos, propped up by an online following that rewards controversy over compassion?

A Cautionary Tale

This isn’t just about Nala. It’s about the broader problem of performative Christianity—the kind that preaches grace but practices judgment, that celebrates redemption stories only when they come wrapped in a bow of respectability. The Wilsons and Pearl Davis are products of a culture that values appearances over authenticity, a culture that is quick to cancel and slow to forgive.

If the Wilsons truly wish to embody the faith they so loudly defend, they’ll need to start by looking inward. They’ll need to trade their condescension for compassion, their judgment for grace, and their public performances for private acts of love. Until then, their rhetoric will remain what it has always been: a noisy gong, a clanging cymbal, a hollow echo of the faith they claim to represent.

And Nala? She doesn’t need their approval. Her story, like every true story of faith, belongs not to the critics but to the Creator.

A Call to a Reflection

If Andrew Wilson wishes to preach the Gospel, he must start by living it. That means setting down his stones and seeing the humanity in those he so easily condemns. It means acknowledging his own flaws with the same fervor he uses to call out the flaws of others.

Because the truth is this: Christianity is not about perfection. It’s about grace. It’s about looking at someone society has written off and saying, "You are still loved. You are still worthy." Until Andrew understands this, his words will remain hollow—a clanging gong in an empty temple, a faith built on judgment rather than love.

And perhaps, in the quiet moments when the debate lights dim and the crowd disperses, Andrew will hear the echo of Christ’s words—not as a rebuke, but as an invitation: He who is without sin, cast the first stone.

— Zzenn

The Sins of Andrew Wilson: Hypocrisy Exposed

 

They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act. Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou? This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not. So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.

- John 8Andrew Wilson: A Temple of Contradictions

Andrew Wilson, ever the self-appointed gatekeeper of morality, has made a career out of pointing fingers. But when it comes to his own vices—smoking cigarettes and drinking alcohol—he has no trouble rewriting the rules. The man who judges others with the sharp edge of scripture somehow dulls that blade when it’s time to face his own reflection.

The Theology of Excuses

Andrew’s defense of his smoking and drinking habits is almost poetic in its audacity. He compares the habitual intake of nicotine and alcohol to eating a Big Mac from McDonald’s, as if a late-night indulgence in fast food holds the same weight as inhaling cancer-causing chemicals or pouring ethanol into his bloodstream. The comparison feels less like a theological argument and more like a desperate attempt to justify what he knows, deep down, doesn’t add up.

He argues that his choices don’t harm his relationship with God, framing them as harmless personal preferences rather than sins. But this defense, cloaked in pseudo-philosophy, crumbles under the weight of scripture. If the body is truly the temple of the Holy Spirit, as 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 states, then what does it say about a man who willingly poisons that temple?

A Father’s Gamble

Andrew’s excuses might be easier to swallow if they didn’t have such high stakes. Every cigarette he lights, every drink he pours, chips away at the future he claims to protect. Cancer doesn’t care about theological arguments, and addiction doesn’t negotiate. His habits don’t just threaten his own life—they threaten his children’s futures.

Imagine them fatherless, left to pick up the pieces of a legacy shattered by choices he stubbornly refuses to confront. It’s a cruel irony for a man who champions the family unit as a cornerstone of his faith. How can he claim to guard the spiritual health of his household while undermining its very foundation with every drag and every sip?

The Pharisee Paradox

The real tragedy isn’t just the smoking or the drinking—it’s the hypocrisy. Andrew’s critics call him out regularly, pointing to the glaring contradiction between his moral sermons and his personal behavior. And yet, his response is predictable: deflection. He casts his accusers as judgmental, Pharisaical, missing the “real” message of grace. But isn’t that exactly what he does to others, wielding judgment with the zeal of a modern-day inquisitor?

Andrew’s public debates and social media interactions are saturated with this same sanctimonious energy. He condemns others for their sins, often with a tone so condescending it feels less like correction and more like a spectacle. Yet when the spotlight turns toward him, he twists the narrative, presenting himself as misunderstood—a victim of overly harsh criticism.

The Poisoned Temple

For all his theological posturing, Andrew seems to ignore the simplest truth: his habits are a slow poison, both physically and spiritually. Smoking and drinking may not be explicitly listed as sins in the Bible, but their consequences—addiction, disease, and the potential to devastate loved ones—are unmistakable. They dishonor the temple God entrusted him with, a direct violation of the faith he claims to defend.

More troubling, though, is the example he sets. By publicly justifying these vices, Andrew normalizes behavior that contradicts the call to live as a light in the world. It’s not just about him anymore—it’s about the ripple effects of his choices on those who look to him as a leader.

A Legacy of Denial

Andrew Wilson’s contradictions aren’t unique, but they are telling. His life is a reminder of the danger of living in two worlds—one where you hold others to the highest standards and another where you excuse yourself from the same scrutiny. The problem isn’t just his smoking or drinking; it’s the pride that blinds him to the hypocrisy of his actions.

If Andrew wants to be taken seriously as a leader, he’ll need to confront these contradictions head-on. He’ll need to stop hiding behind clever analogies and theological loopholes, and instead face the reality of his choices. Because until he does, his words will always ring hollow—a temple of contradictions collapsing under the weight of its own hypocrisy.

And for someone so concerned with the sins of others, perhaps it’s time for Andrew to put down the cigarette, pour out the drink, and take a long, hard look in the mirror.

Virtue Signalling in the Shadow of a Violent Faith

Andrew Wilson wields his orthodoxy like a weapon, pointing fingers at those he deems immoral while conveniently ignoring the moral contradictions of his own faith tradition. It’s not just his personal hypocrisies—his defense of smoking and drinking, his self-righteous labeling of women as “prostitutes,” or his selective application of scripture—it’s the staggering weight of the Orthodox Christian Bible and the bloody legacy of the Church that underscores the double standards he lives by.

A Bible of Blood and Absurdity

Andrew often positions himself as a defender of biblical truth, yet he seems unwilling to confront the glaring contradictions and violent narratives that saturate the very text he upholds. This is a book where Jehovah commands child genocide (1 Samuel 15:3), condones slavery (Exodus 21:2-6), and rains destruction upon entire cities without hesitation. It’s a book that tells us Jonah survived in the belly of a whale, Balaam’s donkey spoke, and a global flood carried Noah and his magical ark full of every species on Earth.

And then there’s the resurrection of Jesus, accompanied by a zombie apocalypse—graves opening, saints rising, and walking into Jerusalem (Matthew 27:51-53). These stories, taken literally, require a suspension of disbelief that borders on the absurd. Yet Andrew clings to them as the foundation of his moral authority while simultaneously using them to condemn others for their supposed irrationality or lack of faith.

If Andrew is so quick to critique the lives of OnlyFans models or dismiss others as sinners, perhaps he should pause to examine the scripture he cites as his guide. How does one reconcile the moral teachings of Jesus with the barbaric commands of the Old Testament God? How does one preach love and forgiveness while ignoring the blood-soaked pages of their holy book?

The Church’s Bloody Legacy

Beyond the Bible’s contradictions lies the violent history of the Catholic Church—a legacy that Andrew and his wife Rachel conveniently overlook while passing judgment on others. The Crusades, driven by religious zeal, saw the slaughter of countless innocents in the name of Christ. The Inquisition tortured and executed those who dared to think differently. And the colonization of the Americas—often justified by Christian missionaries—resulted in the largest genocide in human history, the destruction of Native American cultures, and the enslavement of entire peoples.

These atrocities aren’t ancient history; they are the foundation of the institution Andrew claims to defend. How can one preach purity, morality, and judgment when their faith’s history is soaked in blood and hypocrisy?

Pointing Fingers with Dirty Hands

For all their outward piety, Andrew and Rachel Wilson embody the very contradictions they claim to stand against. They sit on their moral high horse, condemning others for their choices, while the ground beneath them is unstable and riddled with hypocrisy. They point fingers at women, at secular culture, at anyone who doesn’t align with their narrow worldview, while ignoring the glaring flaws in their own lives and beliefs.

Their orthodoxy is not a beacon of light but a smokescreen, masking their inability to grapple with the inconsistencies of their faith and the violence of its history. They demand accountability from others without offering it themselves, weaponizing scripture to condemn rather than to heal, to judge rather than to love.

Clean Your Own House

If Andrew and Rachel Wilson truly wish to be examples of Christian morality, they would do well to heed the words of Jesus: “First remove the plank from your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye” (Matthew 7:5).

Before calling women "prostitutes," Andrew might reflect on the violence and contradictions within the Bible he defends. Before condemning the sins of others, he might consider the legacy of the Church he represents—a legacy of crusades, inquisitions, and colonization. Before justifying his own vices, he might ponder the example he sets for his children and the faith community he claims to lead.

True morality isn’t found in pointing fingers or clinging to outdated dogma. It’s found in humility, in self-reflection, in the courage to admit when you’ve fallen short. Until Andrew and Rachel Wilson learn this lesson, their judgments will remain as hollow as the ancient texts they twist to justify their pride. And as long as they refuse to confront their own contradictions, they will remain what they claim to despise: hypocrites cloaked in the guise of righteousness.

Andrew’s Stones: A Pharisee in the Digital Age

Andrew Wilson’s disdain for nuance has never been more evident than in his treatment of women on the Whatever podcast, particularly his dismissal of OnlyFans models as "prostitutes." The label is harsh, reductive, and a glaring contradiction to the faith he claims to uphold. It’s not the critique itself that is shocking—it’s the self-righteousness, the casual cruelty disguised as moral authority, that reveals the deeper hypocrisy at play.

"Cast the First Stone": Forgotten Faith

For a man who wears his Catholicism on his sleeve, Andrew seems to have a selective memory when it comes to the teachings of Christ. His words recall the scene in John 8, where Jesus confronts a crowd ready to stone a woman accused of adultery. "He who is without sin, cast the first stone," Jesus says, diffusing the mob and offering the woman grace rather than judgment.

Andrew, however, prefers to wield his stones with precision. By calling OnlyFans models "prostitutes," he reduces them to a single aspect of their lives, ignoring their humanity and their capacity for growth and redemption. It’s a move that echoes the very Pharisees Jesus rebuked—a fixation on sin without the humility to examine one’s own shortcomings.

The Double Standard

The irony of Andrew’s stance lies in his own life’s contradictions. He justifies his vices—smoking, drinking, and a penchant for self-aggrandizing debates—while condemning others for theirs. He insists on moral purity from women whose circumstances he knows nothing about, all while excusing behaviors in himself that poison his body, harm his family, and contradict his faith.

Catholicism teaches compassion for the sinner, not condemnation. Yet Andrew’s rhetoric is not one of invitation or understanding; it’s one of exclusion and judgment. By labeling these women as "prostitutes," he assumes a position of moral superiority that Christ himself rejected.

A Misuse of the Platform

Podcasts like Whatever have become modern-day coliseums, where debates are less about truth and more about spectacle. Andrew thrives in this environment, turning theological discussions into a form of intellectual combat. But his approach to the OnlyFans models wasn’t about theology—it was about control, about asserting dominance over women whose choices he finds offensive.

This isn’t the behavior of a man following Christ’s example. Jesus met people where they were—tax collectors, prostitutes, and outcasts alike—and offered them a path to transformation through love, not condemnation. Andrew’s approach is the opposite: he meets people where they are, then builds a wall around them, ensuring they feel unworthy of the faith he claims to represent.

The Real Sin

In calling these women "prostitutes," Andrew commits a greater sin than the one he accuses them of. He dehumanizes them, reducing their worth to a single choice or career. He forgets that Christianity is a faith of redemption, not exclusion, where even those society casts aside are offered a seat at the table.

And while Andrew’s faith gives him the right to hold moral convictions, it does not give him the right to wield them as weapons. His words betray a lack of understanding—or perhaps a lack of willingness to understand—the complexity of human lives. They reveal a man more concerned with being right than with being good.

But Why Stop Here?Brace Yourself, Here Comes Team Pharisee

In a world that thrives on spectacle, this article would not be complete without the recent drama (the lifeblood of The Crucible) involving Andrew and his wife Rachel wielding their faith like a gavel in the court of public opinion upon their target Nala Ray—a former OnlyFans model who recently converted to Christianity. And to the amusement of the onlookers, their carefully curated personas of moral authority began to unravel. What unfolded next was a case study in hypocrisy, misrepresentation, and the un-Christlike behavior that has come to define much of the modern-day religious elite.

The Setup: Redemption vs. Reputation

Nala’s appearance on the Whatever podcast was raw, vulnerable, and honest. She spoke of her journey from an industry stigmatized by many to embracing the light of Christianity. Hers wasn’t a polished narrative, but then again, neither were the stories of the apostles or the sinners Christ himself welcomed into his fold. She didn’t claim perfection—she claimed grace.

But for Andrew and Rachel Wilson, along with Pearl Davis, her words were ammunition. Instead of hearing a testimony of transformation, they heard an opportunity to point fingers, to uphold their version of the "ideal Christian" by tearing down someone whose story was still unfolding. On social media and in subsequent discussions, they accused Nala of lying about her faith, twisting her words into a narrative of deceit.

Enter Michael Knowles: A Voice of Reason

Michael Knowles, a political and cultural analyst who interviewed Nala after her conversation, stepped into the fray with surprising clarity. He defended Nala, calling out the Wilsons and Pearl Davis for their blatant misrepresentation of her testimony. Knowles didn’t mince words: the Wilsons’ actions, he argued, were not only uncharitable but also antithetical to the core tenets of Christianity.

Knowles highlighted an uncomfortable truth for the Wilsons—Nala’s story isn’t a liability to the faith; it’s the point of the faith. Christianity isn’t a club for the righteous; it’s a hospital for the broken. And by publicly accusing Nala, they were doing what Pharisees have done for centuries: policing the gate while missing the heart of the Gospel.

The Wilson Paradox

The irony is almost too rich. Andrew and Rachel Wilson, self-styled defenders of Catholic morality, are no strangers to controversy themselves. Rachel’s own personal history—multiple marriages, children out of wedlock—stands as a glaring contradiction to the very values they claim to uphold. Yet instead of allowing their own imperfections to foster empathy, they’ve turned their faith into a weapon, using it to attack those whose stories don’t align with their sanitized narrative of redemption.

Their social media interactions and debates drip with a condescension that belies their supposed commitment to Christ-like humility. They don’t just disagree; they belittle. They don’t just critique; they condemn. And they do it all under the guise of "theological discourse," as if a sharper intellect can justify a crueler tongue.

The Hypocrisy of Public Gossip

Gossip is a sin the Bible explicitly condemns, yet the Wilsons seem to wield it with the same sanctimony as their theological critiques. Taking Nala’s words out of context, spreading accusations, and using their platforms to publicly shame her isn’t just unkind—it’s unethical. For people who claim to be devout Catholics, this behavior raises the question: Who exactly are they serving?

Is it Christ, who dined with tax collectors and defended the woman caught in adultery? Or is it their own egos, propped up by an online following that rewards controversy over compassion?

A Cautionary Tale

This isn’t just about Nala. It’s about the broader problem of performative Christianity—the kind that preaches grace but practices judgment, that celebrates redemption stories only when they come wrapped in a bow of respectability. The Wilsons and Pearl Davis are products of a culture that values appearances over authenticity, a culture that is quick to cancel and slow to forgive.

If the Wilsons truly wish to embody the faith they so loudly defend, they’ll need to start by looking inward. They’ll need to trade their condescension for compassion, their judgment for grace, and their public performances for private acts of love. Until then, their rhetoric will remain what it has always been: a noisy gong, a clanging cymbal, a hollow echo of the faith they claim to represent.

And Nala? She doesn’t need their approval. Her story, like every true story of faith, belongs not to the critics but to the Creator.

A Call to a Reflection

If Andrew Wilson wishes to preach the Gospel, he must start by living it. That means setting down his stones and seeing the humanity in those he so easily condemns. It means acknowledging his own flaws with the same fervor he uses to call out the flaws of others.

Because the truth is this: Christianity is not about perfection. It’s about grace. It’s about looking at someone society has written off and saying, "You are still loved. You are still worthy." Until Andrew understands this, his words will remain hollow—a clanging gong in an empty temple, a faith built on judgment rather than love.

And perhaps, in the quiet moments when the debate lights dim and the crowd disperses, Andrew will hear the echo of Christ’s words—not as a rebuke, but as an invitation: He who is without sin, cast the first stone.

— Zzenn

Revelations of Reptilians and Kundalini REVEALED

 

If you are a casual observer of this 19th-century narrative, the Alien Reptoids have caught your attention. In fact, as one who has traversed these waters, I can't think of one spirit-channeled source that doesn't have the scaly creatures looming about.

Is it possible that the Reptilian aliens exist? Do they rule the world? In a universe as big as ours, I believe it is very possible. However, let's first examine the narrative from a critical perspective and see what's left standing. Far be it from me to exhibit dogmatic skepticism.

Researchers such as David Icke have built their New Age ministry on them. In fact, Mr. Icke is mostly responsible for declaring a global invasion by these critters. He claims they shapeshift into world leaders such as George Bush and the Queen of England. Icke touts that the Reptilian race created a false Matrix reality, beamed from Saturn to the moon, to control humanity. One has to wonder if he watched the TV series "V" and the movie "The Matrix" and mistook them for documentaries.
ORIGINS
So where did this idea of alien Reptilians come from? The earliest source of reptilians on record is, well, the Dinosaurs. Yes, that's right, Dinosaurs ruled the earth for 180 million years. Now if you look at the evolutionary timeline (4.6 billion years) of our planet, our species just showed up a few seconds ago with a reptilian brain at the root of our feeling (Limbic) and thinking (Neocortex) brain layers. Scientific evidence shows that the physical and behavioral traits shared by all people originated from apelike ancestors and evolved over approximately 6 million year years.

That factoid does not rule out the possibility of alien genetic meddling or a mix of ancestral origin. Nicholas De Vere and Laurence Gardner have some compelling theories on the topic. However, the Ancient Aliens Series on the History Channel is full of misleading information (watch Ancient Aliens Debunked).

Now compare that timeline to the birth of the UFO movement of the past 80 years. Does it seem strange to you that no one saw a humanoid Reptilian in the past 200,000 years of modern man's brain? Are we to believe that ancient artifacts and stone carvings of reptoid creatures are the only evidence of human shape-shifting lizards?

Then you have Zecharia Sitchin who is the granddaddy of the Ancient Aliens theory. He was exposed by real Sumerian scholars for misinterpreting the Sumerian texts. He literally built his 17 books on a mistranslation of the Sumerian text. And you want to know why? Because he had a degree in economics, he was a journalist, and (I'm not kidding), taught himself Sumerian cuneiform and visited some archaeological sites. There is some evidence that he was a Mason which would add another block to the theory that this entire UFO/Alien narrative of the 19th century was man-made to cover up advanced "human" technology.


The rational explanation for the historical multi-cultural references to dragons, gargoyles, and reptiles, falls in 2 categories. 1) The further back you go in history, the closer to the age of the dinosaurs. We literally live on a planet that was ruled by giant reptilian monsters. It's no wonder these creatures exist in our ancient mythos. 2) Our species has locked with our spine a magical power called Kundalini or Dragon energy. This psycho-physical force is reptilian in nature. In fact, I can tell you from first-hand experience that reptilian shape-shifting occurs in the full release and metamorphosis of this energy, and I mean from bat wings to horns. You will also find the serpent energy grows over the top of the head and settles in the middle of the brow. This alone could explain the obsession with reptilian imagery in the stone statues of yesteryear.Dragon MenThe first reference to reptoids in modern literature is in the work of Helena Blavatsky, founder of the Theosophical Society. In her seminal work The Secret Doctrine, she spoke of the "lost worlds" of Atlantis and Lemuria and a mighty civilization of "dragon-men." But this is where New Age believers stop short and jump into fantasy land.


Blavatsky was very clear that the ancient dragon-men were, well, let's just say it, "Men" and not shape-shifting aliens. In her view, the Serpents were emblems of wisdom and prudence. They were symbols of special powers, immortality, and divine knowledge given to initiates, or Nagas (snakes), of a secret order.

In The Secret Doctrine vol. I, she writes:

The Nagas of the Hindu and Tibetan adepts were human Nagas (Serpents), not reptiles. Moreover, the Serpent has ever been the type of consecutive or serial rejuvenation, of immortality and time.

And again in The Secret Doctrine vol. II:

The earliest Initiates and Adepts, or the Wise Men, for whom it is claimed that they were initiated into the mysteries of nature by the UNIVERSAL MIND, represented by the highest angels, were named the Serpents of Wisdom and Dragons.


In The Theosophical Glossary, she states:

The Naga is ever a wise man, endowed with extraordinary magic powers, in South and Central America as in India, in Chaldea as also in ancient Egypt. In China the worship of the Nagas was widespread, and it has become still more pronounced since Nagarjuna (the great Naga, the great adept literally), the fourteenth Buddhist patriarch, visited China.

The Nagas" are regarded by the Celestials as “the tutelary Spirits or gods of the five regions or the four points of the compass and the center, as the guardians of the five lakes and four oceans (Eitel). This traced to its origin and translated esoterically, means that the five continents and their five root races had always been under the guardianship of œterrestrial deities, i.e., Wise Adepts.

The tradition that Nagas washed Gautama Buddha at his birth, protected him, and guarded the relics of his body when dead, points again to the Nagas being only wise men, Arhats, and no monsters or Dragons. This is also corroborated by the innumerable stories of the conversion of Nagas to Buddhism. The Naga of a lake in a forest near Rajagriha and many other Dragons were thus converted by Buddha to the good Law.


A similar symbol for the Initiates was that of a dragon, especially in China. Blavatsky wrote:
In every ancient language the word dragon signified what it now does in Chinese”(lang) i.e., the being who excels in intelligence and in Greek drakon, or he who sees and watches.” In China “the Dragons of Wisdom were the first disciples of the Dhyanis, who were their instructors; in short, the primitive adepts of the Third Race, and later, of the Fourth and Fifth Races.

This Dragon has a septenary meaning, the highest and the lowest may be given. The former is identical with the Self-born, the Logos (the Hindu Aja). He was the second person of the Trinity, the Son, with the Christian Gnostics called the Naasenians, or Serpent-Worshippers. His symbol was the constellation of the Dragon. Its seven stars are the seven stars held in the hand of the Alpha and Omega in Revelation. In its most terrestrial meaning, the term Dragon was applied to the Wise men.


I'm going to step out on a limb and suggest that if there is any reptilian shape-shifting going on then it would be a human metamorphosis into a reptilian form much like a caterpillar transforms into a butterfly by observable physical change. But I would bet my house that shape-shifting is an atavistic resurgence. That being, the inner subjective body shape shifts into an animal form within. We are part wolf, fish, reptile, and so on. It is only natural to experience manifestations of our animal selves.

You will find in Shamanic traditions and Vampirism, the shape-shifting of various animals such as wolves, cats, and winged creatures. The physical form will contort as the built-in animal energies are invoked, but this does NOT mean the body transforming like the stories of Wolfman and Dracula. Psycho-emotional possession can contort the physical body in disturbing ways but should not be thrown into the Hollywood bin of fantasy. Persons plagued with severe psychological trauma will most always express twisted features on their faces.Dragon BloodlinesIn Nicholas de Vere's book The Dragon Legacy, he discusses the concept of the ancient dragon bloodlines, which he claims are the descendants of a noble, royal lineage with unique spiritual and supernatural abilities. According to de Vere, these bloodlines trace their ancestry back to pre-Christian times and are linked to the ancient rulers of Sumeria, Egypt, and other advanced civilizations. He emphasizes that these lineages are connected to beings often referred to as "dragons," not in the literal sense but in a symbolic, esoteric way that signifies their divine or semi-divine origin.

One of the central themes of de Vere’s work is the idea that these dragon bloodlines possess an innate spiritual power, closely tied to what he identifies as kundalini energy. In his view, kundalini represents a serpent-like, coiled energy residing at the base of the spine, which, when awakened, rises through the chakras (energy centers in the body) to the crown of the head, leading to heightened consciousness, spiritual enlightenment, and even supernatural abilities.

De Vere suggests that members of these dragon bloodlines have a natural propensity for awakening and harnessing kundalini energy. This energy, in his theory, is part of their inheritance and contributes to their extraordinary mental and spiritual capabilities, including heightened psychic awareness, visionary experiences, and possibly even immortality. He argues that these dragon lineages were historically revered as priest-kings and that their spiritual practices, including the activation of kundalini, were closely guarded secrets.

Moreover, de Vere links this kundalini energy to the broader concept of gnosis or self-realization, which is tied to ancient esoteric traditions. He believes that these elite dragon bloodlines have preserved esoteric knowledge throughout history, including the secrets of spiritual ascension through kundalini awakening, which has been systematically suppressed or hidden by mainstream religions and ruling powers, particularly the Church.

The next incarnation of the scaly creatures can be found in the fiction of Conan the Barbarian and the 1929 edition of Robert E. Howard's "The Shadow Kingdom," published in Weird Tales. This story was influenced by the Theosophical ideas of Blavatsky.

Clark Ashton Smith, a fantasy, horror, and science fiction writer, used Howard's serpent men in his stories and was additionally influenced by H. P. Lovecraft who created the Cthulhu Mythos; Cthulhu being a giant reptilian squid. Lovecraft also describes these human-half-reptile-creatures in The Nameless City and He Who Haunted the Darkness. Author Edgar Rice Burroughs (an American fiction writer) also mentions semi-human semi-reptile creatures living underground reducing the human species to slavery and as food.


This leads us to the January 29th, 1934 story, in the Los Angeles Times entitled "Lizard Peolpe's Catacomb City Hunted." And if you're wondering about the mis-spelling of "people's" in the title you may be surprised that it was published with a typo (I'm sure conspiracy buffs had fun with that one).


Fake news stories were not uncommon for the L.A. Times (that should come as no surprise in today's media). On Feb. 25, 1942, The Times reported that Los Angeles had been attacked by Japanese pilots. This report has been hailed by the UFO community as proof of an alien invasion.

Roaring out of a brilliant moonlit western sky, foreign aircraft flying both large formations and singly flew over Southern California early today and drew heavy barrages of antiaircraft fire” the first ever to sound over United States continental soil against an enemy invader".

The Times went further saying one of the aircraft was reportedly shot down near 185th Street and Vermont Avenue.

But there was one problem with this story ” None of it was true. The military did fire anti-aircraft missiles into the sky but not at Japanese pilots. The United States Coast Artillery Association identified a meteorological balloon sent up at 1:00 a.m. and exaggerated by stray flares and shell bursts, all the shooting started. And because of the collective fears around WWII and the Japanese internment camps, the military and civilian population were suffering from "trigger finger," fear, and an unbridled imagination. Add in that this was a time when science fiction was fresh on the scene as a cultural meme. The incident occurred less than three months after the United States entered World War II in response to the Japanese Imperial Navy's attack on Pearl Harbor.


In 1934, a mining engineer named Warren Shufelt claimed he had invented a radio X-ray machine could detect underground tunnels. Inspired by a Hopi Indian legend, by a tribesman called Chief Green Leaf, Shufelt claimed he had found a network of underground tunnels collectively shaped into a mape shaped like a reptile. In these tunnels lived Lizard people and lots of gold.

The L.A. Times grabbed the story and ran with it. This is not a surprise since it was the golden years of science fiction. They reproduced a map of the tunnel system complete with arrows pointing at the gold, including a cartoonist drawing of the Lizard People.

No reptoids or underground tunnels were found. But the story did inspire a 2011 horror movie entitled Underground Lizard People, which was advertised as "based on actual events." Humans are story-telling animals and that's why the entertainment industry gets paid the big bucks.

But maybe the most telling evidence is the tunnels, now condemned and closed to the public, housed LA's first underground transit system. In the prohibition era, the tunnels were used to transport liquor to customers in speakeasies all across the city. One tunnel still runs to a Skid Row bar called the King Eddy Saloon. The tunnels have become abandoned concrete passageways filled with graffiti and crumbling walls.


The next on our list of Reptilian influences comes from "another" science fiction writer named Richard Shaver who claimed that he had descended under the earth, encountered an ancient race in possession of advanced technology, and was leaking this truth under the guise of fiction. Of course, this turned out to be a hoax invented by Shaver and his buddies, which became the catalyst for Fate magazine.

His story, "The Shaver Mystery," was about an advanced race who had built cavern cities inside the Earth before abandoning Earth for another planet due to damaging radiation from the Sun. These creatures kidnapped surface-dwelling people for meat or torture. They also spied on people with their "ray" machines and projected tormenting thoughts and voices into their minds.

And guess where this narrative came from ... The Coming Race by Edward Bulwer-Lytton, published in 1871. Once again you have the same story about an advanced underground race involving Lizard people, who have magical powers, are descendants of an ancient civilization, and want to destroy mankind.

Then you have the Theosophist (go figure) Maurice Doreal who authored the famous New Age book The Emerald Tablets of Thoth the Atlantean, which was widely promoted by Drunvulo Melchezideck from the Flower of Life paradigm. In THIS story he talks about a war between the forces of good and evil involving an underground reptilian race. He claims he found the original Emerald Tablets (a ninth-century Hermetic text) in the Great Pyramid of Giza in 1925. The only problem was, that his translations bore little resemblance to the original work. But more telling, his story was a repackaged version of Robert E. Howard's Serpent People and an explicit plagiarizing of H.P. Lovecraft's Old Ones in The Call of Cthulhu and The Dunwich Horror.


The reptilian narrative was next picked up by Val Valerian who published the Matrix volumes. These were phone book-sized word sales of disinformation mixing truth and fiction. In Matrix 2, page 172, you have the same story of underground reptilians, with the addition of "The Greys" (the typical oval-headed alien), who are using humans as a food source and up to all sorts of evil things. This theme runs through this entire series coupled with the teaching of the Law of One by Channeler Carla Rueckert whose predictions of a 2012 harvest of souls dropped like a Led Zeppelin. And yet, David Wilcock and Corey Goode peddle her teachings like the Holy Cosmic Bible ... is there no shame?

Does this mean that the Greys do not exist in underground military installations as part of a plan to rule the world? Or that they are genetically engineered creepazoids designed to fool civilization of an alien invasion? No. This may be the scenario. But keep in mind that disinformation runs alongside the truth in any psyop worth its weight in deception.

No one has brought the reptilian agenda to the public mind more than David Icke, who gathered the story from Val's Matrix volumes and other sources like Alex Collier who promoted, yet again, the "reptilians eating humans" hypothesis.


Icke, in the tradition of Val's work, published his own phone book-sized volumes (700 to 900 pages) full of truth and fiction about an evil elite, underground civilizations, human shape-shifting lizards, and a conspiracy that reaches all the way to the planet Saturn, complete with the moon being a Satellite beaming a false Matrix to earth to control humanity (ya, he spent way too much time watching the Matrix). He even has a book entitled "Children of the Matrix".

These stories come from people taking fiction stories literally, rather than translating them. It reminds me of how channelers take the movies The Matrix' and 'Close Encounters of the Third Kind' as if they were documentaries. And not even Steven Spielberg's admission that he used to believe aliens were here but now thinks it's all bunk will shake their believing brain loose.

Modern channeling promotes this reptilian narrative because it gives them a nemesis to blame for the world's problems. And just like the orthodox Satan of old, freedom is found under the umbrella of God's protection and the Spirit's loving guidance and ascension.

David Icke, David Wilcock, and Corey Goode are masters at peddling this narrative throughout their books, films, and seminars. Their latest movie, "Above Majestic" is a perfect example of this disinformation packaged for the gullible masses who want to believe. I produced a video series debunking their claims.

Despite the complexities inherent in New Age Woo, the reptilian story is built on the same general themes repackaged from earlier sources, of which, most channeling cadavers for "spirit" are completely ignorant. This is why word salads of reptilians, underground bases, positive and negative aliens, fake history, and fake science are easy to generate and sell the most products. The New Age market is a profitable racket as long as there are gullible people to take the bait, and I don't think we will ever have a shortage of that.Staged Alien Invasion?
Conspiracy theorists and whistleblowers like William Cooper and Wernher von Braun have long warned about the possibility of the global elite staging an alien invasion to manipulate humanity. Both believed that such an event could be used to instill fear and centralize global control.
William Cooper, a former naval intelligence officer, claimed that many UFOs were not alien but advanced, manmade aircraft. He believed the elite would use these craft in a staged alien invasion to justify a global government and strip away individual freedoms under the guise of security. Cooper saw this as part of a long-term plan to establish a New World Order.
Similarly, Wernher von Braun, the famous rocket scientist, warned that after exploiting other threats, the final card the elite would play would be a fake alien invasion. According to von Braun, this would be used to justify massive military spending on space weapons, not to protect Earth from aliens, but to cement control over humanity.
Both figures highlighted the involvement of the military-industrial complex, which has developed secret, advanced technologies. These technologies, according to Cooper and von Braun, could be used to simulate an alien invasion, convincing the public that an extraterrestrial threat is real.
The psychological impact of a staged alien invasion could unite people under a single, authoritarian global government, bypassing national sovereignty in the name of security. Given how deeply the alien invasion narrative has been embedded in popular culture, such a false flag event could easily be accepted as reality.
In short, both Cooper and von Braun saw the alien invasion threat as a manufactured strategy, designed to instill fear and control, rather than a genuine extraterrestrial encounter.
In Closing, I have presented various perspectives for the reader to ponder to keep an open mind on this topic. In a universe of billions of galaxies, each with its own black hole leading billions of other galaxies, it is no leap to ponder the existence of such creatures. Nor is it a leap to accept how cunning,  deceptive, and gullible human animals can be.
Zzenn

 

Scientology, Hypnosis, and the Thetan Trance

During my 30-year journey hacking through the jungles of metaphysical thought, I became fascinated with Scientology. Who was this elusive character named L. Ron Hubbard? Why was he rarely quoted in other literary works? He was the founder of one of the largest new churches in the 20th century, yet you would be lucky to find any reputable reviews, quotes, or articles about him. Was this a cover-up? Did he crack the code to the human mind, thus inciting the “powers that be” to suppress this knowledge from public awareness?It was a little obvious that something was going on. You just can’t have a religion that is home to Hollywood stars, has grown into a global phenomenon, and not find the founder logged into the annals of our history books. What is going on here? For years before the internet grew into the size it is now, you were lucky to find any info that was not sculpted by the church. Thanks to the World Wide Web, people started digging and found many dirty little secrets about this man and his movement.For one, it was discovered that the official story of L. Ron Hubbard was blown way out of proportion to create a savior-like public image. Persons who knew him throughout his life painted a very different picture. Hubbard was a master storyteller and had a tendency to blow the facts way out of proportion. For more on this, read Bare-Faced Messiah: The True Story of L. Ron Hubbard.In light of this well-kept secret, the question of why Hubbard was not hailed as a great spiritual leader in our history books takes on a whole new meaning. Could it be that he did not get recognition in his field of expertise because he never submitted his work to peer review? I would venture to say Scientology set him up more as a cult icon than a legitimate pioneer in the consciousness movement. He should, however, get the booby prize for the most trendy cult of the 20th-century religion.Having said that, there is something to be gained from a study of his work for no other reason than a case study on human motivation. Anyone who can create a world religion practically overnight by consolidating a system of thought that transforms human beings into efficient spirit machines should be looked at closer. I say this because some people don’t realize how vulnerable they are when deep emotional issues are touched upon by cult leaders. Unless we develop our critical thinking faculties, we will be vulnerable to those using theirs in malevolent ways.

L. Ron the Master Hypnotist

Another interesting little find was that Mr. Hubbard was a master hypnotist. When I was introduced to Scientology, I was just a teen, and what struck me most was this “otherworldly” knowing stare in the eyes of its members. For years, I pondered that stare. What is the “it” they have? Why doesn’t the average person have that calm presence about them? Was this proof that this spiritual technology was the answer to our problems? It took me many years, in fact, a few decades, to figure this one out. Remember that back in those days (1983), we did not have access to the data we have now.One thing I have always looked for is patterns in my research. Across the board, in just about every spiritual tradition, you will find the knowing “stare” in the eyes. In some traditions, a harmless sense of “being” is common from someone feeling deeply into their connection to life. For others, it turns into a lethal persistent hypnotic trance. Initiated in the context of an irrational belief system, the believer begins to make dangerous decisions with their lives. Here we have a natural phenomenon being transformed into a manipulation tool for the religious agenda.Read My Billion Year Contract: Memoir of a Former Scientologist by Nancy Many.Before I go on, I want to make clear that, in my experience, there is a big difference between an altered state of awareness and a hypnotic trance. Regarding the former, one is in a hyper-alert organic state, and in the other, one is under a spell. Religion almost always hijacks natural phenomena. In the case of Scientology, their techniques facilitate the connection with a sense of being that most people feel rarely, if at all, their entire lives. This is key because it argues why Scientology has continued on this long, attracting new followers.Most people will not be adept enough in psychology to understand what is actually happening to them when experiencing a Dianetic auditing session. The procedure of Dianetics therapy (known as auditing) is a two-person activity. One person, "the auditor," guides the other person, "the preclear," in looking at their mind to resolve hidden motives and buried traumas. The idea is to get the person to permanently exist in the present time after releasing all identifications with subjective traps throughout time. This leads to increased experiences of peace and resolution as they progress up the Bridge to Total Freedom.I can say that there are some useful things in the lower levels of Scientology if you can "eat the grapes and spit out the seeds," but I am not recommending it in place of trained psychotherapists. In fact, unless you are in good psychological shape, I would warn against it. You can check out this website for a source outside the official church that offers the technology free of cult attachment.

Read 'Scientology - Circus of the Stars' by TheThinkingAtheist

For those consciousness explorers, I recommend studying the subject to understand what is happening during a session. Otherwise, the temptation to assign special agency to the method could lead one to follow the white rabbit down the hole. Educate yourself, have fun with it if you like, but don’t ever suspend your critical-thinking faculties. On the other hand, don’t let your critical mind keep you from exploring new territory, either. Venture into the jungle if your curiosity leads, but keep your wits loaded and cocked just in case.I love going into a trance state and disappearing into the cosmic feeling of wonder. However, I have learned over the years to keep my head straight. In the case of magic mushrooms or ayahuasca, a reasonably conscious person doesn’t come back from the trip believing trees are made of a fuzzy material that changes shape when not being looked at. On the contrary, in its proper context, a transcendent experience can be very useful and informative when balanced with science.The problem lies in a gross cultural deficiency of scientific education. That people in our modern age still believe in a (trigger warning) Jewish zombie who lives in the sky should be mind-blowing to the average person. Unfortunately, due to the magic of emotion and irrational belief, we get the joy of having our noses rubbed in it daily. I cannot honestly say that it does not make life interesting, but changes need to be made when it comes to child abuse, war, and poverty.Regarding Scientology, it becomes obvious that advanced psychological techniques were used on the uneducated. In the Anderson Report, you can delve deeper into the details of Scientology and hypnotism. Suffice it to say, workable therapeutic processes were used in the context of a structured belief system that inevitably trapped the novice into a subjective nightmare.What is still unknown to many people is that Hubbard was better at compiling other researchers’ information than he was at originating it. The sad part is that much of what he originated was a science fiction story rather than the research he represented. Take Alfred Korzybski; here is one of many researchers few people have ever heard of. When I first glanced at Korzybski’s book Science and Sanity: An Introduction to Non-Aristotelian Systems and General Semantics, my jaw dropped.Having studied Scientology technology for years, I had no idea this knowledge was available pre-Scientology. There are many examples from which Hubbard’s work is clearly drawn. Another eye-opener was Dr. A. Nordenholz’s work published in 1934, Scientology: Science of the Constitution and Usefulness of Knowledge. Hubbard codified data from various sources into a system built on fantasy and delusion. Additionally, the so-called “Bridge to Total Freedom” turned into a financial treadmill with the sole purpose of enforcing a hypnotic trance that served the empire.Read Behind the Iron Curtain of Scientology by Marc Headley.Another thing to consider is the time in which Dianetics and Scientology were born. In 1950, science fiction was ripe in the cultural mind, and the UFO phenomenon was just taking root. New discoveries in the mental health industry were emerging while dark age shock therapies were still in operation. It was the post-World War II era, and radiation was fresh on the public’s mind with the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. When you start to put all of this together, a picture emerges that places the philosophy of L. Ron Hubbard in the scene.There is a more insidious aspect to all of this just in case you thought I was letting ole Ronny boy off the hook. Enter Aleister Crowley, Jack Parsons, and the occult school of The Golden Dawn. Hugh Urban’s study named The Occult Roots of Scientology?: L. Ron Hubbard, Aleister Crowley, and the Origins of a Controversial New Religion is not freely available, but the following article from Village Voice does a good job summing it up. Here is an excerpt below.Urban goes on to explain how in Crowley’s magick, the fundamental concept is Thelema, which represents a person’s inner will, and the ability to do “what thou wilt.” Doing the processes of Crowley’s magick rituals, the point is for a magus to astrally project himself so that he can ultimately become an all-powerful being who is “capable of being, and using, anything which he perceives, for everything that he perceives, is in a certain sense a part of his being.

Urban goes on to explain how in Crowley’s magick, the fundamental concept is Thelema, which represents a person’s inner will, and the ability to do “what thou wilt.” Doing the processes of Crowley’s magick rituals, the point is for a magus to astrally project himself so that he can ultimately become an all-powerful being who is “capable of being, and using, anything which he perceives, for everything that he perceives, is in a certain sense a part of his being. He may thus subjugate the whole Universe of which he is conscious to his individual Will.”

Sound familiar? In Hubbard’s Scientology, which he insists is a science that will allow you to discover your true nature, you learn that you are a thetan. Through his processes, you will ultimately be able to leave your body and become an all-powerful being able to create universes.

Now, we get into more dangerous territory for the unwary spiritual seeker. Initially, it seems quite harmless when one is introduced to Scientology auditing. In fact, because it was originally rooted in scientific research by masters such as Sigmund Freud, it is hard to distinguish between reality and fiction for the newbie.

Traveling back into our memories to uncover hidden trauma is a common practice. However, to inject a story of a time track that splits into both a genetic line and a Thetan (spirit) line is just not grounded in peer-reviewed science. Of course, this time track must have an “Invisible Spiritual Being” who travels over many lifetimes on various planets through parallel universes. Perils await the gullible novice seeking initiation into the mysteries of the ages in the subjective landscape.

Read 'Inside Scientology: The Story of America’s Most Secretive Religion'

The magical ceremony's key to the occult tradition is the manipulation of emotion. Generating emotion through ritual is the catalyst for profound psychological experiences. When it comes to religion, all you need is an emotional response in the context of a cosmic story surrounded by a group of believers, and “wallah,” you have a convert. Just like Christianity, where the emotional experience of forgiveness occurs in the context of ‘the Jesus’ story, Scientology gives you Xenu and the Thetans. Sounds like a rock group. All kidding aside, what is truly vicious about this is that it leads to mind control, brainwashing, broken families, and financial ruin.

One clue in identifying someone under a hypnotic trance is how defensive they get when their mental-emotional investment is challenged. When it comes to Scientology, there is no better example of this behavior. Scientologists pride themselves in being the great dispensers of the secrets of communication. One of the keys they teach is the ability to confront anything. Oh, how ironic this process is demonstrated when their religion is questioned. I have not seen such overt defensiveness, projection, and blatant lies as in an interview by a British BBC reporter John Sweeney.

This is just one example of many, but to say that they contradict the very thing they teach is an understatement. I have first-hand experience in the TRs (training routines), which train a person to remain calm when someone is pushing their psychological hot buttons. But Scientologists become more defensive the further they go up the Bridge — which translated means: The more programmed they become the more irrational they get. In the video below, you will observe the anger and projection by Tom Cruise when asked simple questions about his religion. 

Peter Overton's infamous interview with Tom Cruise | 60 Minutes Australia

But maybe Scientology's most blatant red flag is the idea that we have been reincarnating for billions of years. The expensive ‘Bridge to Total Freedom’ is based on clearing the endless memories of Thetans throughout time. Scientology claims you can have perfect memory and remember events in stunning detail from billions of years ago through auditing. Do you smell a rat here? It’s a money machine scam. There are enough memories in 1 billion years to keep a person on the treadmill forever.

Was L. Ron Hubbard a prolific writer and speaker with the leadership skills of a commander? Yes, but in the end, his underhanded methods of manipulation and lust for power spoke louder than a billion words. The truth has a funny way of sticking around.

— Zzenn