J.C. Paulson's Blog, page 6
October 26, 2017
You media people rock.
In the lead-up to my book launch, my amazing publicist Britainy Robinson Zapshalla reached out to the local media and they have been incredible. So has she.Indeed, our local media are generally incredible. They work hard to cover what's happening in our fair prairie city, not only from a hard news standpoint but from a community standpoint. It's a long-running tradition here. I am so grateful that they have included me, and my first book, Adam's Witness, in that community news. Thanks to the Saskatoon Express, The StarPhoenix, CTV, CBC and Global. You do keep Saskatoon glued together. Informed. Thriving. Culturally aware. You don't get enough appreciation for it, and because I'm part of the whole thing most of the time, I can't really pat 'us' on the back.Now that I've been on the other side of the mike, I can.
Published on October 26, 2017 14:07
October 21, 2017
On the mystery shelf

Published on October 21, 2017 11:56
October 8, 2017
Dickens of a read

My rating: 4 of 5 stars
Don't be fooled by the cover. This cozy mystery is a fast-paced, pull-you-through story taking place in Atlantic City and Montreal, Canada. I detect a glimmer of Raymond Chandler, a private detective's office that cries out to be broken into, a web of tough guys and clever PIs. A clear style keeps a complex plot understandable and exciting. Get on Damien and Millie Dickens' third ride.
View all my reviews
Published on October 08, 2017 10:23
October 7, 2017
Falling away

Published on October 07, 2017 11:47
September 7, 2017
End of summer brings a beautiful melancholy

Published on September 07, 2017 08:47
August 11, 2017
Diefenbaker deserves statue, recognition for his human rights work
This column was originally published in the Saskatoon Express.John Diefenbaker, once prime minister of Canada, is much in the news these days.He would absolutely love that.His return to the media spotlight comes courtesy of Garrett Wilson, a Regina lawyer and author. He objects to the statue of Diefenbaker selling a newspaper to then-Prime Minister Wilfrid Laurier, sitting on the Saskatoon corner of First Avenue and 21st Street.Date of occurrence was ostensibly July 29, 1910. The statue was, appropriately, funded by the StarPhoenix.But Wilson says the newspaper transfer never happened. That’s not to say the StarPhoenix blew it, by any means; Diefenbaker told the story about meeting Laurier many times during the 1963 election campaign. Wilson claims that story was never verified.Well, maybe it happened, and maybe it didn’t. Dief was somewhat known for telling stories; and he certainly told this one, many times. Wilson argues that the statue is journalistically on shaky ground, since Dief himself was the only source on the story, and Wilson doesn’t trust that source.Let us assume that the story is apocryphal. Even so, it fell from Diefenbaker’s lips; and if he is not the most reliable witness, who else would have seen the event, and verified it? It’s pretty hard to prove either way. And it’s a heck of a good statue.I met him once. It was in the lobby of the Sheraton Cavalier hotel; I was very young, and quite amazed that the former prime minister was standing right before me. He walked right up to me and shook my hand, murmuring some sort of pleasantry, his head, sadly, shaking slightly. I wasn’t exactly overwhelmed at the time, but I’ve always liked meeting PMs, particularly when they’re actually in power. Gives you a better feel for who they are, and what’s going on.I met Paul Martin before he became PM; Brian Mulroney (his head is even bigger than it looks on TV) while he was in office; and Stephen Harper. “Met” is maybe a big word for the slim interaction, although I had a great interview with Martin once, when he was still finance minister.Returning to Dief the Chief, though, we need a statue of him in Saskatoon. If this is the right one, and I do really like it, I leave it up to debate. I prefer to remember Dief for the great good he did.When I studied political science at the University of Saskatchewan, I wrote a paper (and got a resounding A, if I may say so) on Dief’s early effects on apartheid. He stood against the South African government and opposed its membership in the Commonwealth. The opprobrium from Canada and other nations led South Africa to retreat from its application for readmission."Apartheid has become the world’s symbol of discrimination,” said Diefenbaker in the House of Commons on March 17, 1961. “I took the position that if we were to accept South Africa’s request [for readmission] unconditionally, our action would be taken as approval or at least condonation of racial policies, which are repugnant to and unequivocally abhorred and condemned by Canadians as a whole."May I say, Amen?Diefenbaker gave First Nations people the franchise in 1960; they voted for the first time in 1962.Also in 1960, Diefenbaker’s government enacted the Canadian Bill of Rights, the first federal expression of human rights law. It was a bill that Diefenbaker started writing in the 1930s, and it’s said that his experience as a lawyer led to a deep frustration with discrimination.I could go on, but you get the picture.To this day, the following quote from Diefenbaker gives me a thrill. Think of all the countries that cannot come close to aspiring to what we have achieved in Canada, in large part because Diefenbaker got the whole thing rolling. This is what it means to be Canadian. “I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear, free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to oppose what I believe wrong, or free to choose those who shall govern my country. This heritage of freedom I pledge to uphold for myself and all mankind.”For all these reasons, getting snippy about a potentially apocryphal statue is perhaps not terribly necessary. Dief was far from perfect. But what he accomplished was incredibly, positively Canadian.www.jcpaulsonauthor.com
Published on August 11, 2017 14:55
The first shipment. A wee one.
It's a strange sensation to open a box with your own books in it. It feels like commitment.Two of these will be off to McNally Robinson soon, to see if they will accept Adam's Witness for consignment. The rest I will peddle on street corners.Just kidding.

Published on August 11, 2017 14:52
July 27, 2017
This is what happens when you start writing romance novels.

Published on July 27, 2017 13:25
July 23, 2017
I don’t love a good thunderstorm
This column originally appeared in The Saskatoon Express. I'll be sharing these from time to time on this, my blog site. If you get the Express, great; if you don't, I'd love for you to read these here.
Well, now. Wasn’t that a mighty storm?From time to time, I hear people saying “Oooh, I love a good thunderstorm.” Let us, just for a moment, dissect that for those of us who just don’t understand why anyone would actually like high winds, pouring rain, hail, ear-splitting thunder and jagged electrical lines flashing across the sky.The “oooh” part may be an expression of awe. As in “oooh, that was a big one.” Or, “oooh, that mountain sure is high” or “oooh, that man sure is handsome/woman is beautiful.”Then we have the subject/verb phrase, “I love.” I recall a Mad Men episode in which Don Draper (about whom women often say, “oooh, that man sure is handsome”) lecturing the copywriting staff about using the word “love.” We “love” our family, friends, pets and, perhaps, our nation. We do not “love” our washing powder, toothpaste or soft drink. (I suspect some of us do “love” our cars, mind you.)In any case, we do not “love” inanimate things, and if we truly do, we are weird. I’m willing to accept the argument, here, that thunderstorms are not exactly inanimate. Neither, however, do they have souls.Now we arrive to the object of the thing, “a good thunderstorm.” What, pray, is a “good” thunderstorm? Does this refer to an extremely active, exciting, seemingly endless weather event? One that gets the blood raging and produces excellent photo opportunities? Does it come with hail, rain and wind in addition to the thunder?Or, is a good thunderstorm one that behaves well, and causes no damage?Good thunderstorm. Pat, pat. Nice thunderstorm. Please do not dent my car, break my windows or flood my basement.In the wake of last week’s storm (and I do mean wake, since every time a car drove through the two-foot-deep lake at our intersection, it created enough wake to be a boat on a river) I’ve heard several people say, “Oooh, I love a good thunderstorm. But that one was a bit too much. Even I didn’t really love that thunderstorm.”It was a thunderstorm. Do you love them, or do you not? Or only when they’re “good”?I am in a different place on the thunderstorm love-hate debate. I do not love thunderstorms. I suppose I should not hate them, either, to be consistent with my theory about emotions over inanimate things. Let’s say, instead of hate, that they scare the ever-loving bejeepers out of me.This time, I saw that baby coming over the tops of our fir trees. My husband was downtown at the gym, and wouldn’t be ready for a while yet. Then, yes, he planned to walk home, too.Nothing doing, said I. I called him and said, “I’m on my way, if you can be ready early. It’s going to storm.”He agreed.Then all hell broke loose. The wind came up, rain started to pour and the hail hammered down. There is no way I am driving through a hailstorm. The hail finally stopped, and I got ready to leave…and it started again. We had three hailstorms in 45 minutes.When it finally abated, I pulled out in the car, looked right, then left . . . and realized there was an enormous lake at the end of the block. Big trucks were making it through, but I have a small SUV.I turn around and get to Broadway and Taylor, and it’s underwater, too. So I hit the freeway, and ended up driving through three enormous pools, and past three stalled vehicles. (That’s what you get if you drive through deep pools. Just saying.)We came home and, with our neighbours, spent the next hour clearing debris out of the drains on the corner. That was fun. By 8:30 we were wet, cold, filthy and starving.They say it was a 25-year storm. I recall one eight years ago, in which the lake at the corner crept halfway up our lot. If it hadn’t finally stopped raining that night, our house would have been under water, along with some of our neighbours. Seems to me we get a 25-year storm every eight to ten years.This time, there were popped manhole covers, power outages, hail damage, flooded basements. An acquaintance had the stucco stripped from her home by hail. Oddly, a friend of ours on the far east side of town had nothing. “Storm? What storm?”It was pretty exciting for some of us, though. Was it a good thunderstorm? I leave it to you to decide.

Published on July 23, 2017 09:35
July 22, 2017
Hitting the publish button
Aieeee. Can you hear me screaming from there?It was scary, but I did it. I hit the publish button on the paperback. It should hit the website, amazon.com, in a couple of days.I regret deeply that it's not perfect; I'm no typesetter, I have learned. But I think it's readable. I've used Calibri in 11 point in black on white, rag right instead of justified, and I think it's easy on the eyes.The proofing process was intense. I can't count the number of revisions, from typos and extra spaces to chapter numbers jumping all over the place. If you've ever tried this, or something like it, you'll know what I mean.So thank you, Caroline Dinter, for all your patience with the cover. Thank you, Ken Paulson, for saying "ship it." Thank you, sister, for being such a huge support and an inspiration. Thank you, brother, for reading and for your name. Thank you, all you amazing beta readers, friends and family members, for putting up with me. Pictured here is the actual book in proof form. It's never really real until you see it in print.Launch to come in the fall.On to book two.

Published on July 22, 2017 11:35