C.A.A. Savastano's Blog, page 4

Miller Center Fellow Promotes JFK Assassination Myths

A featured Wall Street Window article by C.A.A. Savastano offers evidence and some of the several flaws within official and academic claims regarding the latest release of Kennedy assassination documents.

JFK Lancer 2022 Conference Presentation

Information provided by author Carmine Savastano with respect to his speech “Infamous yet unproven suspects and a viable but largely unknown one” as discussed at the JFK Lancer 2022 Conference. Included below are several links to related research and information relevant to his evidentiary inspection of three public figures in the Kennedy Assassination case.

QJWIN-1: Jose Marie Andre Mankel
Article: Who was QJWIN-1?
Evidence: QJWIN-1 Mary Ferrell Foundation Cryptonym Listing

WIROGUE-1: David Tzitzichvili
Articles: Who was WIROGUE-1?
Who was WIROGUE-1? part II
Evidence: AEASPIC Mary Ferrell Foundation Cryptonym Listing
WIROGUE-1 Mary Ferrell Foundation Cryptonym Listing

John Henry Hill
Article: The Man About Town

JFK Lancer Website

C.A.A. Savastano returns to The Ochelli Effect

Join authors Mike Swanson and Carmine Savastano as they discuss this year’s ongoing 2022 JFK Lancer Conference, Savastano’s presentation, and items of interest regarding the case. In the second hour Chuck and historian Larry Hancock chat about his upcoming Lancer presentation and the subjects related to the case as well.

The Disgust Reflex

Defensive Physical and Emotional reactions Are Naturally Triggered By Disgust Reflexes When Faced with Most Rotten Organic Materials

Disgust is a primal human emotion that can reflexively trigger when facing real and imagined dangers that according to studies requires less than a second based on the circumstances of an encounter. Regarding humans, the disgust mechanism uses facial expressions and social circumstances to make snap judgments in situations based on often highly superficial traits to rapidly process social and physical cues.i Disgust reactions are based upon a variety of circumstances which emerge from social encounters with other humans that extend to variances as minute as regional eating habits. Food plays a central role in several gatherings and social environments in which human interact and some disgust related behaviors are tied to the consumption and abstention of specific foods based on preference, religion, and socially developed aversion.

Researchers studying the disgust mechanism were able to illicit responses in participants using food products that were accompanied by a negative written assessment that highlights one of several methods demonstrated how emotions can be influenced. “We conducted a regression analysis to predict the number of beef chips eaten in the first behavioral task (see Table 2). The full model was statistically significant and explained 12% of the variance in the amount consumed. In this task, we made use of the fact that researchers have previously found a negative correlation between people’s food-related disgust and their consumption of meat and fish (Eickmeier et al., 2017). Participants’ food disgust sensitivity emerged as a significant predictor for the amount of meat participants ate. With increasing food disgust sensitivity, the amount consumed decreased.” However, a similar inspection which used food that participants found unpalatable offered reduced disgust reactions to the food if the person fasted before the later testing, hunger seemingly can overcome some disgust reactions.

“From an evolutionary point of view, disgust protects from transmission of infectious disease and suboptimal reproduction. It impacts our hygienic, sexual, and contact behavior.”ii Reproduction presents “the highest infectious risk of any social behavior” due to intimate situations presenting a chance for infections via “bodily fluids”, skin contact, and the opportunity for possible infecting diseases. One review of these behaviors noted that monogamous relationship strategies in part are undertaken based upon disgust sensitivity and “increasing pathogen costs that accompany each new sexual partner.” Such encounters often rest upon sensitivity levels which are based on a host of factors that includes personal hygiene to maximize chances of reproductive success. Despite significant potential dangers for proper socialization, people must develop a range of disgust reactions and moderate the strongest when dealing with “intimates” to promote survival and mental health, without such moderation the natural range of disgust can shift and promote “dysfunctional barriers” that can emerge prevent normal social interactions.

Disgust sensitivity usually serves as a protective and cognitive strategy when undertaken by most and further explains behaviors such the normal distance people observe when interacting socially with others in public. The vast majority of humans strike a balance of personal disgust preferences to include social interactions with familiar people that are naturally considered less threatening in comparison to strangers. This natural mistrust of strangers was demonstrated in one study that found personal aversion to strangers extends to even smells and being exposed to disgusting substances in which the sources are unfamiliar to an observer. Our disgust reaction to unknown “stimuli from strangers” can prove so exceedingly strong it elicits heart rate changes and increased “avoidance behavior”.iii

Mealworms are one of Hundreds of Thousands of Types of Insects that eat Rotting Materials which can Trigger disgust in Humans

The regulation of hygiene is a common triggering mechanism for disgust reactions in most people and “the source effect” extends to even to people that are just unfamiliar. “Some specific phobias and obsessive compulsive disorders are classical disgust-related disorders with a generally increased sensitivity to disgust.” These would include phobias of specific animals or substances that can transmit disease or be considered taboo or disgusting by various humans and notably “obsessive washing is related to enhanced fear of contamination, which results...in the avoidance of situations with the potential risk of contamination.” While disgust plays a role in protective measures it can become a psychological burden if left unchecked by reasonable behavior and social limitations.

Other similar reactions are formed when dealing with environmental dangers and toxic substances triggering a natural revulsion in the majority of tested subjects. “It has been shown that people who are very sensitive towards disgust and contamination are less often affected by infections...Disgust serves as a behavioral immune system is not sensitive to pathogens...Instead, disgust is directed against cues that signal that infection risk might be present whether due to its morphology” and the study further reveals that smells and visual cues reveal the expectation for potential infection. Humans exhibit stark physical defensive reactions within facial reactions as they experience disgust and once a possible source of revulsion is identified several reactions occur as part of “anti-pathogen adaptions”.iv

According to the Royal Society these adaptions are heavily influenced by parental disgust reactions which can influence the development of similar feelings in their children after five years of age. Additionally, familiarity with family members was found to reduce disgust reactions and dealing with offspring or related substances that normally were considered disgusting produced little revulsion in parents. Investigating researchers learned that disgust reactions can emerge from inherited reactions, environment, and socialization while noting that family levels of disgust were similar but parental sensitivity levels alone could not assure outcomes. The same review further states there is little evidence to support that disgust just emerges from neuroticism, parental influences, or is calibrated to the presence of infectious diseases. There likely is a host of factors that in concert produce specific disgust reflexes in humans which together influence avoidance behavior and form anti-pathogen strategies to maximize the assurance of survival. Yet the reaction when founded upon incorrect or pathological motivations can seemingly be a source of needless conflict that potentially might endanger those with overly sensitive disgust reflexes.

Sincerely,
C.A.A. Savastano

References:
i. Pierre Krolak-Salmon, Marie-Anna Henaff, Jean Isnard, Catherine Tallon-Baudry, Marc Guenot, Alain Vighetto, Oliver Bertrand, Francois Mauguiere, An attention modulated response to disgust in human ventral antererior insula, February 14, 2003, Annals of Neurobiology, doi.org/10.1002/ana.10502
ii. Maria Lenk, Gerhard Ritschel, Marion Abele, Peggy Roever, Julia Schellong, Peter Joraschky, Kerstin Weidner, Ilona Croy, The source effect as a natural function of disgust in interpersonal context and its impairment in mental disorders. Scientific Reports 9, Article 4239, March 12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40...
iii. Ibid.
iv. Joshua M. Tyber. Cagla Cinar, Annika K Karinen, and Paola Perone, Why do people vary in disgust, June 4, 2018, The Royal Society, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0204

A Brief History of North American Slavery III

The KIng of France Louis The Sixteenth and Emporer Napoleon Bonaparte that both supported the imperial slave complex

Part III: France and the Imperial Slave Complex

Centuries of Native American tribal bondage and imperial European slavery had been ongoing within North America when further nations of Europe beyond the earliest undertook large scale trade of human beings. No matter how reprehensible any practice might be, the act of profiting at the cost of other people has seemingly forever lurked within humanity’s instinctual depths. Its practice according to some reports predates the existence of written language and slavery has been like a poison coursing through the veins of humanity for millennia. Eventually there was another slave trade competitor beyond the Portuguese, Spanish, and English in the North American colonial period that sought greater power by any means necessary, imperial France.

With the exception of a single imported child slave named Oliver Le Jeune in French held Canada during 1629 it was not reportedly in that country until the start “of the 1670s when the French began to receive captives from their Aboriginal partners as tokens of friendship during commercial and diplomatic exchanges. The Illinois were notorious for the raids which they led against nations to the southeast and from which they brought back captives.” This would feature the undeniability of slavery in a tribal form predated the arrival of the Europeans and was a longstanding existing custom of the original North American societies. Similar to the Native North American societies and English practices within its colonies, the French were a part of a larger imperial European slave complex that extended across the world.

We can observe that native tribes had engaged in subjugation as a means of controlling captives and this system was rendered more widespread and became a more destructive and permanent form of human bondage. Following the arrival of the early 1700s “the practice of buying and selling these captives like merchandise was established.” In just thirty short years the French had morphed the already existing tribal bondage into a series of laws that converted any captive to salable property. One likely motivating factor in this process was religion, many French like the English and Spanish believed that anyone unbaptized in the Christian faith was a heathen and thus not protected by “civilized” law. The origins of these native slaves ranged from people in tribes that include the Fox, Apache, Labrador, Chickasaw, Pawnee, and Sioux but the Louisiana Territory held by France in southern North America and its Caribbean holdings prevented the widespread use of native tribes due to location and where planters “preferred African slaves, who they judged more apt to work in their indigo and tobacco fields.” We can in this cold and inhuman calculation see that not due to any lesser status but the ability of Africans to survive in hotter temperatures better than Native slaves or European indentured servants was the concern. This illegal domination generated and protected imperial profits and was perhaps the greatest motivator for using slavery.

French Held CArribean Slaves in Antigua work A Sugar Cane Field

“Trade in human beings for work in plantations and mines in the Caribbean also occurred within the region itself, with trade routes linking Brazil, the Gulf of Mexico seaboard and the coasts of North America and the Caribbean islands. They were the scene of constant trafficking from the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries, which can barely be quantified but should not be overlooked. For three centuries, Guadeloupe and Martinique took in slaves from other mainland and island colonies in the Caribbean region in which trafficking was conducted via the human trade hubs of Saint Thomas, Saint Martin and Saint Barthélemy.”i

SlAves are orders To restrain A man By thier Owner and beat Another Human for Defying HIm in The West Indies

The French would expand their slaving to include Africans in time and construct forts in Western Africa to protect the imperial financial interests. According to Canadian historical officials the slave trade from Africa began in Louisiana during 1719. “Effectively, it lasted about 12 years, from 1719 to 1731, when the King of France resumed authority over Louisiana after having temporarily ceded it to franchise holders and investors.” However, this cessation of most slavery only extended to most continental areas and not islands of the French Antilles which held most French slaves in captivity to work plantations. This change did not occur due to benevolence and instead emerged because the islands of Antilles were more profitable to French slave traders.ii Additionally, hundreds of black slaves were abducted from English ships or sent from the Antilles long after King Louis the XV of France resumed his financial dominion.

“For more than two centuries, French settlements in Africa and the Americas relied on enslaved laborers to produce colonial commodities and perform domestic service. Between the 1620s and the 1840s, more than one million Africans-and thousands of Amerindians-lived as slaves in France’s American colonies…Although concentrated in the Caribbean, enslaved people lived in all of France’s Atlantic colonies under widely varying conditions…French settlement played a significant role in the larger history of slavery in the Atlantic world.” The Low County Digital History Initiative at the College of Charleston offers that system of slavery may have varied and changed in time based on “Spanish, Portuguese, and to a lesser extent French settlers from along the Mediterranean Sea often had greater exposure to sub-Saharan Africans through maritime trade systems established before the” transatlantic “slave trade. Historian Frank Tannenbaum argued that this prior exposure translated to greater openness towards manumission (where individual slaveholders could choose to free their slaves), multicultural exchange, sexual relationships, and even intermarriage between Europeans and Africans. In contrast, norther European settler and traders, such as the English and Dutch, had less prior exposure to sub-Saharan Africans, or to Mediterranean slavery systems. Their laws for establishing chattel slavery primarily formed in the context of the New World, with a heightened economic incentive to secure slavery for plantation agriculture through rigid racial hierarchies.”iii Yet while the French might have embraced more benevolent stances than other nations, in some areas though could be just as bad and worse.

Haitian Revolution Heroes And The Lousiana Purchase

According to historian Brett Rushforth just before a notable slave revolution in the Caribbean the island of Saint-Domingue held roughly “500,000 enslaved people…another 150,000 labored in Martinique and Guadeloupe”.iv “Slavery was a part of all the societies in the French Americas, but while it was of relatively marginal importance in Canada it was the central economic structure in the Caribbean colonies. The French colonies there – and particularly the last to be formed, that of Saint-Domingue – expanded with startling speed during the eighteenth century, prospering and generating enormous wealth for France.”v In just these three islands France held more African slaves than the entirety of slaves held at one time by most nations in North America. It would require the largely unexpected and violent historical turn of the French Revolution to shatter the imperial desires for slavery. “During the revolutionary years starting in 1789, however, a series of dramatic transformations took place in the French Caribbean colonies, leading to the abolition of slavery by the French National Convention in 1794, and ultimately the defeat of French armies in Saint-Domingue and the creation of Haiti.”

One notable revolution against the imperial slavery of France was the Haitian Revolution that during 1791 was the only instance of successful national slave rebellion in world history.vi According to one study of the related imperial French crimes, “slavery, resistance, and emancipation in French settlements played a significant role in the larger history of slavery in the Atlantic world.” It would require countless failed slave revolts, ceaseless imperial brutality, and the acts of multiple Enlightenment philosophers, religious dissidents, and secular advocates over two centuries to create enough force to abolish slavery in France, but even when slavery ended within its continental borders during the 1840s it persisted in some places overseas within the French Antilles. In fact, the greatest majority of its slaves were located outside the North American continent itself.

“The majority of enslaved Africans went to Brazil, followed by the Caribbean” which largely did not rest within English hands but was controlled by the Portuguese, Spanish, French, and Dutch. Even the Danish would engage in sending hundreds of thousands of slaves to the Americas without possessing any notable land holdings in the New World because slavery was a very profitable business for the imperial powers. Slavery allowed the creation of profit by subjugation without any requirement of skill or talent and relied on the power of oppression endowed by religion and brutal force to succeed. While as many have stated millions of African slaves were taken by imperial powers to the New World, they do not often mention the number of African slaves that came to the United States was roughly just over three hundred thousand people or four to six percent of the entire slave population in the Americas. Canada had even fewer slaves with some estimates reporting under five thousand slaves held within the entirety of its territory. Yet even the repression of one person is contrary to the many principles of the Enlightenment and later nearly universal ethics opposing legalized enslavement by the imperial monarchies.
Sincerely,
C.A.A. Savastano

i. SCHMIDT, N. (n.d.), Slavery and its Abolition, French colonies, Research and Transmission of Knowledge, The Slave Route Project, UNESCO, unesco.org
ii New France, Population, Slavery, Virtual Museum of New France, Canadian Museum of History, historymuseum.ca
iii. African Passages, Low County Adaptations, (n.d.), Low County Digital History Initiative, College of Charleston, ldhi.library.cofe.edu
iv. RUSHFORTH, B. (2012). Bonds of Alliance: Indigenous and Atlantic Slaveries in New France. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, jstor.org
v. DUBOIS, L. (2011). Slavery in the French Caribbean, 1635-1804, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.org
vi. Manisha Sinha, August 23, 2016, The U.N. Is Commemorating Haiti’s Role in Ending the Slave Trade. Here’s Why, Time Magazine, time.com

Related Articles
A Brief History of North American Slavery Part I (Portugal and Spain circa 1444)
A Brief History of North American Slavery Part II (England circa 1640s)

Permalink

Human Truth Bomb w/ C.A.A. Savastano

Join Rob Clark and C.A.A. Savastano to discuss years of attacks targeting Savastano from the depths of ignorance and heralded by the ROKC (poorly sourced researchers that possibly are catspaws of intelligence and proven frauds) who occluded the JFK case for decades because of hubris and blindness, and a cast of twisted people that targeted unfortunate people living and dead as wasted fifty-six years of the public’s time, such as Judyth Baker, perhaps the worst of them all. Luckily, Rob Clark, Mike Swanson, and C.A.A. Savastano were able to reclaim much of the truth and discuss it here.

Permalink

Human Truth Bomb: My Survival of Ceaseless Attacks by Officials and some in the Public

Join Rob Clark and C.A.A. Savastano to discuss years of crime targeting Savastano from the depths of ignorance and heralded by the ROKC (poorly sourced researchers that are catspaws of intelligence and proven frauds), CAPA members James DiEugenio and Lisa Pease who occluded the JFK case for decades because of hubris and blindness, and cast of thousands of twisted, evil, and broken creatures in human form that targeted unfortunate people living and dead as wasted fifty-six years of the public’s time, such as Judyth Baker, perhaps the worst of them all. Luckily, Rob Clark, Mike Swanson, and C.A.A. Savastano were able to reclaim much of the truth and discuss it here. We hope will join us for this episode and future ones as they become available.

The Casebook of C.A.A. Savastano: No. 1 "The Case of the Seven Trophies"

This is a summary is part of my seven-year chronicle that exposed dozens of dishonest and jealous people on both sides of the JFK assassination case that manipulated events to cause disruptions and thwart my research but failed every time. It reveals many helped mythmakers like Judyth Baker block progress and subvert unity among those scholars involved potentially for decades that led often to needless conflict and pointless arguments. Recently I proved that cells in five different countries matched a group created by James Angleton in the nineteen sixties called CAZAB, now referred to as Five Eyes. Five countries include nearly every person attacking me emerges from, it is highly improbable this is just dozens of coincidences, thus, Canada (a cybersecurity specialist focused on stopping the penetration of official information, Trish Fleming), America (a book house disinformation by the score, Trine Day, and false researchers creating decades of confusion, James DiEugenio and Lisa Pease), Zealand (New Zealand, Frankie Vegas or someone else there), Australia (The ROKC), Britain (Bart Kamp and Dealey Plaza UK), C,A,Z,A,B. CAZAB, now Five Eyes. Someone called me paranoid once, their mistake.

It was their shortsighted and prideful nature kept them busy striking at others making real progress and kept them staring at blurry pictures of the Prayer Man myth and obsessing over me for years. It began prior when I disagreed with Greg Parker, Lee Farley, Hasan Yusef, Robert Morrow aka Andrea Skolnick, Bart Kamp, Johnny Hartley, Stan Dane, Arjan Hut, David Turner, Lancelot Uppercut (anonymous account likely one of them), Gayle Nix Jackson, Mark A. O’Blazney, Mick Purdy, Terry Martin, Paul McGurkenfarklel, Tim Fattig (former member of my research group), Trish Fleming (former research group member), Zach Jendro (former research group member), Charles Cliff (former research group member), and various other members of the Re-Open the Kennedy Case Forum (ROKC) about the blurry picture and lack of evidence which is the Prayer Man myth. Among these who began to attempt to attack and subvert me were James DiEugenio and Lisa Pease that sit as the unimpressive mentors to the rest of them and have wasted decades of our time as well.

Johnny Jartley another ROKC minon that chased me at Duncan MCrae’s Forum as they Later Did at the Education Forum because they were obsessed.

The Plot by the ROKC to Attack me and Stop me in the Education Forum from destroying their Prayer man myth. Since they have no ecidence all they could use against me was lies while attacking me in hopes to block the Facts.

They sought to prevent me from containing and debunking their Prayer Man myth, foolish theories, and unproven nonsense. They were upset by others making progress beyond them, and they were lazy dullards crying at those leaving them behind after they failed to be reasonable and transformed into a cult like group. Similar to forlorn lover, they began a six-year string of attacks on me in various forums online and were constantly obsessed with me and the facts I presented against their nonsense. This summary which shall be expounded upon in a future book reveals how I caught seven people attempting to entrap me but they inadvertently revealed themselves to me. Four in one place at one time and three later that I realized afterwards, yet each is an improbable contact that led me to apprehending all of them and exposing the plot.

The first major clue of something amiss was an appearance by Marshall Rodney Evans, Robert Groden’s partner asked me for a picture with him. Yet he did not desire a normal one, I take many of those, no he wanted me to take an old-fashioned handshake politician shot, like he was my friend or in politics, it seemed another trophy, he had fooled me or so he thought. This of course stuck out in my mind, truly a mistake as we can observe. He “befriended” me years later yet failed to realize he walked into a trap which I had waited years to spring and capture him and as many deceptive people as possible. He obliged and delivered Pease and DiEugenio plus five others to me and thus, a first trophy revealed him, one of five.

A picture used by RObert Morrow with his false character Andrea Skolnick that did not exist and was a manipulative tool that Morrow created to render discord.

The mythmaker Robert Morrow aka Andrea Skolnick (a false identity he used). I was able to detect his deception after comparing several statements from Morrow and his alias which cannot be hidden such as word choices and writing style that no one might fully hide. Further notable was “Andrea’s” repeated mentions and complaints about Roger Stone, that Morrow worked with prior and this might imply Morrow used her to generate interest for Stone as well. Stone from my research into him loved any kind of press and relished media infamy, including bad press or mentions that “Andrea” did almost daily. Andrea was constantly battling with me in groups using the same nonsensical approach that matched the exact style of Morrow but I was unsure for a time and believed she might Judyth Baker, based on common personality traits. Quite the sad person who must change sexes just to keep looking at me or undertake such nonsense, he needs mental help and a hobby.

A conflict between Reliable PRo-Commission Researcher Steve Roe, WHom I credited with helping PRove a conspiracy, even though we disagreed. His evidence aided me and I credit anyone that does. As you can see morrow is Vulgar and Deranged with a constant mention of Roger Stone, This is just like Andrea Skolnick’s Stone obsession and is one of many traits that reveals Morrow is Skolnick.

Morrow and I had tangled in related groups over his nonsensical prattle and he hated me with a passion, I largely disliked him and ignored his antics because he was unimportant to me. Strangely, Morrow shambled his way around drawing attention to himself and he circled my table at the JFK Lancer 2017 Conference and took one of my books from the sales room and brought it to me to sign it. This was perhaps his largest related mistake, if he truly hated me or disliked me as I did him, he would have ignored me as I did him. Yet this act revealed he was deeply interested in getting my attention without realizing I knew he was doing so. He obviously wanted to get a book signed by me from an undeclared reason. When my book ended up vanishing, multiple witnesses saw him leave with the book and he never paid, thus stole it. I promptly realized he had made the appearance to get a trophy, the second of five.

It was far later when I realized in the same two-hour timeframe a friend of mine, John Newman, had his phone stolen at the conference. I assumed that it may have been to get his contacts that someone present may have desired, since Judyth Baker had a simultaneous conference elsewhere in Dallas I considered the possibility she had dispatched minions to grab items at Lancer. It was years later it occurred to me Morrow is connected to JVB. I know he got my book and what are the odds another item of related importance from a good researcher would be stolen by a different person in that small timeframe? Highly improbable, yet that was my clue of trophy gathering. This was another clue to the deception they left unintentionally that in time became clear to me.

The CAPA Advertisements in 2017 for Judyth Baker’s conference at the CAPA webpage, Two leaders in CAPA are Lisa Pease and James DIeugenio.

The next sign was Jimmy DiEugenio heckling my speech at the 2017 Lancer conferences at the Adolphus Hotel, as he had the year before, because he was jealous of my useful award-winning research compared to his usual rehashed nonsense from decades ago. Thus, he desired also desired a trophy by disrupting my speeches but he did not and revealed his malice by doing it twice, this established a pattern of childish attacks and marked him to me. It made him stick out in my mind more than his wholly inappropriate sweat suit ensemble, I like to call him the Sweat suit King and Lisa Pease his constant companion is his Lady of the Fake. Thus, knowing he was a mentor to some in the ROKC that I encountered in my past time there it established a remote possibility of more than just him being persistently childish. That same year I had prior noticed well know JFK groups with Jim DiEugenio, Lisa Pease, and Robert Groden helped advertise JVB’s conference and it linked them. Now we have three trophies, and thus possibilities of collusion began to distinctly form.

Next was Glenn Viklund, perhaps the most curious of all the connected people, a supposedly “pro-commission” person that knew John McAdams, but he came to JFK Lancer, pro conspiracy, strange. He flew from Sweden and had for years fashioned himself the opponent of Judyth Baker, however so had others that aligned with her as well. He told me the journey was expressly to see me, stranger, we had never met but subsequently he asked DiEugenio to take a picture of us after he stated hating DiEugenio. Yet if he hated him then he would not have asked, you do not associate with people you hate, you stay away. Thus, he did not hate him, add that to the picture, my book stolen by Morrow, Newman's phone for JVB, and DiEugenio heckling and associated equals possible conspiracy. Yet there were more trophy seekers.

Trish Fleming was a former member of my research group I expelled for serving the conspiracy of dullards against me led by the ROKC and the other Judyth Baker aligned minions. Trish who I once told that she was more intelligent than me had decided in the time after the other trophies had been collected to ask if I would provide her a reference to a new job. She was not wholly clear on the nature of the job but stated I was the best researcher she knew. I was flattered of course but it was quite odd, she was not aware of my true level of intelligence since I was concealing it then and only had my high school diploma with a couple years of college. She was unaware of the tens of thousands of books and official files I had read, and thus why ask someone like me to provide a reference? Unless you wanted a sample of my writing to analyze. Additionally, the “best researcher” line was seemingly a lure to flattery and meant to entrap men into writing a letter, I did, but soon knew this was a fifth trophy. I looked into the job and found she was now employed by a cybersecurity firm doing “penetration testing” to surveil hackers and possible threats to official groups, like me, and perhaps was seeking to provide information about me or there was some assignment to surveil me, as the CIA has repeatedly and failed. Thus, a trophy from a person working for a business surveillance group, and that similar firm wholly fit the prior pattern.

Charles Cliff, a security guard, whom I think of as a wannabe Lestrade, that gave me leadership in a nonsense group with a handful of people, because he believed that he could emotionally manipulate me to make him the administrator in my group of hundreds. I of course indulged his belief that he was crafty and made him an administrator to prove he was safe and could fill the group with lemmings I could catch in one fell swoop and make feel secure he had got the better of me, wrong again. He assumed per usual they possessed a superior position and could take my group as I had prior taken it from Ralph Cinque, a dullard that believes in a former most popular blurry picture idea Doorway that preceded the Prayer Man tripe. I blocked and removed him and then purged their corrupt influence as they prior hoped to do so with my useful information. Yet they only had strategy, a poor one, and I possessed better strategy and tactics. Strategy requires ideas but tactics require observation, and they have none. Thus, another trophy attempt, the sixth one.

The final trophy is a disturbing look into the twisted mentality of several ROKC members. As some may know the only members of my small media group are Chuck Ochelli, Mike Swanson, Rob Clark, and myself. It used to include Trish Fleming, Charles Cliff, and Tim Fattig, who all were members of the ROKC as well. I decided months ago I would remove inactive people (Trish, Zach, Charles, and Tim) I spoke with Tim first and strangely he wanted to remain, even as an inactive. His strong desire of course struck me as odd, if he wanted to remain it would stand to reason he would contribute. Since he rarely did it lead me to ponder why he wished to stay. I began to deduce his reasoning was similar to that of the prior trophy seekers and this was a chance to spy on me. I soon realized how long Tim, Trish, Zach, and Charles were aligned with the network. This led me to consider the many disturbing implications.

Several implications soon clarified as I realized how deeply each had corrupted aspects of the JFK community. Among Tim’s despicable actions were aiding “Andrea Skolnick” aka Robert Morrow in defrauding the public with a tale that “Andrea’s” house burned down and Tim supposedly made a large donation. However, my suspicions about Robert Morrow being Andrea became proven it allowed me to deduce that Tim was in league not with Andrea but whomever portrayed her. He participated in a fraudulent money drive seeking to raise money for this farcical disaster that no one endured. One episode included Greg Parker, the “leader” of these rabble, using his children as the supposed “victims” of an attack by the JVB network called Rey Rey Rey, a fake account, probably Parker himself. He used his children to generate sympathy for himself and likely attention for his book, he is a disgusting individual that was still whining about me years after I left from jealously and likely because of his lesser intelligence. He additionally has been defending

Thus, seven people attempted to make a trophy of me but instead I made trophies of them and they each led me to a greater plot against me and the entire JFK research community that includes the ROKC, Members of CAPA, pro-Commission people, and even some officials simultaneously that led to Five Eyes. Some are plants that have caused intentional damage and confusion among the community on both sides to serve personal, business, and official purposes. I have no issue with officials if they leave me and the case alone, it is over, it is conspiracy and we should all work toward the historical truth, if they actually value truth. However, based on evidence and the position I now have the mythmakers in such games are soon over, but that is another story. A story which shall continue until all of them are exposed and the public has fair chance at learning the truth of the case.

Sincerely,
C.A.A. Savastano

The Death of Stalin with C.A.A. Savastano

In these stressful times you are invited to a recent interview that looks at the gallows humor historical classic “The Death of Stalin”. Featuring a talented cast that includes Steve Buscemi, Simon Russell Beale, Paddy Considine, Rupert Friend, Jason Isaacs, Michael Palin, Andrea Riseborough, Paul Whitehouse, and Jeffrey Tambor.

Fact, Film, and Historical Fiction Triple Feature

You are invited to a three shows featuring discussions about sinister history as several inspect the evidence, artistic value, and the many contradictions of a famous leader. Three recent shows each with evidence and analysis for your review.

For those with a taste for debunking official and public myths: JFK Myths 16
For those who favor a discussion of film: Shining Lights Different Democrat
For those who choose disturbing history: Jefferson’s History Current Mysteries