John Lauricella

year in books

John Lauricella’s Followers (20)

member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
member photo
Beth We...
490 books | 67 friends

Vijay N...
547 books | 47 friends

Iliana ...
267 books | 26 friends

Brandi
156 books | 19 friends

Sita Se...
278 books | 17 friends

Christi...
200 books | 35 friends

Sarala
17 books | 2 friends

Risa
4,465 books | 191 friends

More friends…

John Lauricella

Goodreads Author


Born
Brooklyn, The United States
Website

Genre

Influences
Don DeLillo; Ward Just; Kafka; Calvino; Camus; Nabokov; Joan Didion; J ...more

Member Since
May 2013

URL


John Lauricella was born in Brooklyn and taken away as a child to suburban New Jersey, where he attended the public schools. He graduated from Colgate University A.B., Phi Beta Kappa and magna cum laude; later, he earned an M.F.A. in creative writing and a Ph.D. in English Language & Literature at Cornell University. He has served academic and administrative agendas at Cornell, especially in its Law School and its division of Alumni Affairs & Development. He has taught courses in essay-writing, as well as in English and American literatures, at Mercy College, Marymount College, Yeshiva University, Ithaca College, and Cornell. He has also worked as a country club caddie, a proofreader and copyeditor, and in the Manhattan Criminal Court; and ...more

To ask John Lauricella questions, please sign up.

Popular Answered Questions

John Lauricella "2094" began in a dream a couple weeks before Thanksgiving 2007. I dreamt a version of myself that was simultaneously my then-current age and some yea…more"2094" began in a dream a couple weeks before Thanksgiving 2007. I dreamt a version of myself that was simultaneously my then-current age and some years younger, dressed neatly in a dark blue uniform with a shield or insignia embroidered in gold on the jacket's left chest. The uniform was not military and the appearance of the me / not-me was roughly my own when I was about 30 years old. I / not-I was inside some kind of flying craft that was not an airplane or helicopter, cruising soundlessly at high altitude inside an interior airspace. The sky was milky and the sensation was definitely that of being within a great, arching dome, a vast enclosure. The purpose of my flight was not evident but it seemed implicitly to have a destination; it was not just a joyride. I remember an intimation of something important at hand and a vague realization that I was en route to some sort of authority and, once there, would receive instructions about how to proceed.

No instructions were forthcoming, alas. This dream never recurred and had no sequel. I wrote up the scene sketched above -- it ran to about a page -- called it "The Dome," and put it away while I worked on other things, most notably my novel, "Hunting Old Sammie," which I completed in January 2010. At some point -- I don't remember exactly when; maybe in the spring of 2009 -- I looked at "The Dome" and let myself wonder what it might be a hint or sign of. I didn't know the reason for the dark blue uniform or the meaning of its golden device, and knew nothing of any environment or setting that featured airborne travel inside an enclosed space, so there was no way to write about them at the start. Luckily, the first sentence came along fully-formed: "Airpods gleam in the skyways as the century dwindles and men like J. Melmoth are amazed to be alive." I heard those words over and over and said them to myself many times to be sure I was receiving them correctly, and when I wrote them on the page I knew something was there -- a character, obviously, and, given his unusual distinctive name, one involved in some way with either time-travel or immortality, or both (as in the great and prolix Gothic classic, "Melmoth the Wanderer," by Charles Robert Maturin, in which the title character swaps his soul for immortality). "Airpods" and "skyways" were pretty obvious, given that dream; and with the century dwindling, in the sense of running out, and being alive an occasion of amazement, I had enough hints to begin.

At first I had a sense only of the story of J. Melmoth, so that's what I wrote. In the book, the four settings and their respective characters alternate fairly consistently but in the early stage of composition only Melmoth, his PAC Jenna, and his wife Raquel existed "on stage," in a manner of speaking. Helpfully, part of what these characters are doing in those initial scenes is watching video of other characters in other, very different places: Mars, Mexico, Gulag Cuba. How or why those particular locales called themselves out and took up residence in the story, I can't explain. It felt as if it had to be that way -- that the story had to have four distinct settings and that these were and always had been and always would be Mars, Mexico, and Gitmo. So I imagined ways into those places and found characters alive in each, and so began writing their stories in parallel with Melmoth's. The juxtapositions, reiterations, echos, overlaps, and eventual intersections are, I think, pretty easily recognizable. And the ending (although I say so myself and the assertion can only come off as immodest) is perfect.

On the other hand (and in a spirit of humility), I'll say that the novel risks being misunderstood. Perhaps every novel that is not simplistic or overtly didactic does. Mainly the risk is that the narrative's interconnectedness goes unperceived. For that reader, the novel is going to seem scattered and random. It should not be possible to misread "2094" in that way, as a haphazard, sprawling farce, but an inattentive reading could cause it. Especially dangerous -- to the book, to the reader -- is the cursory sort of skim-job practiced by review-writers. Rifling through the book quickly, reading just five or ten pages here and there then skipping, skipping, and moving on, would allow such a reader, particularly one not much interested in the novel's premise or subject-matter, to form a very wrong impression of how the book works and what it's trying to do. Add any strong bias to this scenario and the result is probably a disaster. "2094" depicts a cast of very diverse characters without sentimentality or special pleading; depending on a reader's biases, he or she could easily feel offended by such impartial handling. Each reader is no doubt entitled to any honest feeling about any book, but the authenticity of that feeling does not make it valid to other readers, nor an even-handed aesthetic appraisal of the book itself. It is, by any sane sense of critical judgement, a misreading. And misreadings are always possible -- in fact are inevitable, inescapable, if any reading that does not fully match the author's intention (as if any author's intention were ever fully knowable, even to the author) qualifies as one. For "2094," the misreading that likely would be most destructive would proceed from the assumption that the novel is a parody or satire or "send-up" of, say, "1984" or "Brave New World," based, I guess, on the the book's title and the prominent appearance of Huxley's novel in "2094." That misconception would make the reader deaf to the novel's tone and blind to its nuance. Prejudiced by an expectation of seeing characters and storylines mocked, such a reader would likely experience "2094" as a nasty, trivial business. And that would be unfortunate because the book's intentions are exactly the opposite. Its depictions are sincere and are meant to read as such. It is not a pastiche of future-world dystopian fiction, it is a serious variation on that genre. Its horrors are not mutant creatures (unless one counts SmartBots), environmental ruination (although this is present in Mexico and implicit on Mars), the destruction of cities and the collapse of law and order into anarchy, but a state of affairs close to the opposite. At the same time, marginalized persons -- rebels who will not bow down -- are disenfranchised and abused by a cynical and self-valorizing ruling elite, whose most potent weapon is mind-control. Mind-control -- scripting -- is practiced in several different ways to lesser or greater degrees of effectiveness. The characters who resist mind-control most steadfastly, faithfully, and authentically are the heroes of "2094," as I believe the epigraph (lifted from "1984") suggests.

The title is an homage, of course, to Orwell's "1984." The other precursor, which the foregoing remarks indicate, is "Brave New World" -- hardly surprising, given the "new tech" glitz of "2094" and the dehumanizing tendencies all those gadgets seem to promote. And of course "Brave New World" becomes a crucial plot-point about mid-way through Melmoth's narrative arc. All of this seems more or less inevitable to me because I was fascinated by both "1984" and "Brave New World" when I first read those books many years ago. I knew then I would like very much to write something similar to either book or, even better, a futuristic dystopian novel that featured elements of both. That's what I've tried to do in "2094."

To explain how the story developed during the four or so years I spent writing it would probably ruin it for anyone with an interest in reading it, so I'll shut up here.(less)
John Lauricella The global oligarchy holds sway just as it has for a thousand years. Money wins, the rich do whatever they please and get away with their gross and ru…moreThe global oligarchy holds sway just as it has for a thousand years. Money wins, the rich do whatever they please and get away with their gross and ruinous behavior no matter how immoral and destructive it is, and ordinary people like you and I pound sand.(less)
Average rating: 3.89 · 36 ratings · 16 reviews · 9 distinct works
2094

3.53 avg rating — 15 ratings — published 2014 — 4 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Hunting Old Sammie

3.75 avg rating — 8 ratings — published 2013 — 5 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
The Pornographer's Apprentice

really liked it 4.00 avg rating — 4 ratings6 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
Home Games: Essays on Baseb...

3.67 avg rating — 3 ratings — published 1999
Rate this book
Clear rating
Home Games: Essays on Baseb...

it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 2 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
THE CHINA PLOT

it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 2 ratings2 editions
Rate this book
Clear rating
2094

it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 1 rating — published 2014
Rate this book
Clear rating
Unforgettable

it was amazing 5.00 avg rating — 1 rating
Rate this book
Clear rating
Unforgettable

0.00 avg rating — 0 ratings
Rate this book
Clear rating
More books by John Lauricella…

What Abides: On Vince Passaro's Crazy Sorrow

Crazy Sorrow Crazy Sorrow by Vince Passaro

My rating: 5 of 5 stars


My newest favorite book, just read. I bought it when it came out because I knew Passaro’s name from his reviews in Harper’s and recognized a kindred sensibility. Plus, I liked his prose style. Turns out, this novel is close to something I might have been able to do if (1.) I had Passaro’s keen perceptiveness of women’s thinking and feeling, a Read more of this blog post »
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 23, 2026 08:51
Harlot's Ghost
John Lauricella is currently reading
bookshelves: currently-reading
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
J R
John Lauricella is currently reading
bookshelves: currently-reading
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
Gotham: A History...
Rate this book
Clear rating

 

John’s Recent Updates

John Lauricella rated a book it was amazing
Crazy Sorrow by Vince Passaro
Rate this book
Clear rating
My newest favorite book, just read. I bought it when it came out because I knew Passaro’s name from his reviews in Harper’s and recognized a kindred sensibility. Plus, I liked his prose style. Turns out, this novel is close to something I might have ...more
John Lauricella started reading
Harlot's Ghost by Norman Mailer
Rate this book
Clear rating
John Lauricella started reading
J R by William Gaddis
Rate this book
Clear rating
John Lauricella started reading
Gotham by Edwin G. Burrows
Rate this book
Clear rating
John Lauricella started reading
Crazy Sorrow by Vince Passaro
Rate this book
Clear rating
John Lauricella rated a book really liked it
A Meaningful Life by L.J. Davis
Rate this book
Clear rating
John Lauricella rated a book it was ok
Tender Is the Night by F. Scott Fitzgerald
Rate this book
Clear rating
John Lauricella wants to read
Crazy Sorrow by Vince Passaro
Rate this book
Clear rating
John Lauricella rated a book it was amazing
The Razor’s Edge by W. Somerset Maugham
Rate this book
Clear rating
John Lauricella rated a book liked it
The Life of Henry Brulard by Stendhal
Rate this book
Clear rating
More of John's books…
Quotes by John Lauricella  (?)
Quotes are added by the Goodreads community and are not verified by Goodreads. (Learn more)

“Jenna is acting strange. Weeping, moping, even remarks tending toward belittlement Melmoth might tolerate (although he cannot think why; she is not his wife and even in human females PMS is a plague of the past) but when he caught her lying about Raquel—udderly wonderful, indeed—he knew the problem was serious.

After sex, Melmoth powers her down. He retrieves her capsule from underground storage, a little abashed to be riding up with the oblong vessel in a lobby elevator where anyone might see. Locked vertical for easy transport, the capsule on its castors and titanium carriage stands higher than Melmoth is tall. He cannot help feeling that its translucent pink upper half and tapered conical roundness make it look like an erect penis. Arriving at penthouse level, he wheels it into his apartment. Once inside his private quarters, he positions it beside the hoverbed and enters a six-character alphanumeric open-sesame to spring the lid. On an interior panel, Melmoth touches a sensor for AutoRenew. Gold wands deploy from opposite ends and set up a zero-gravity field that levitates Jenna from the topsheet. As if by magic—to Melmoth it is magic—the inert form of his personal android companion floats four feet laterally and gentles to rest in a polymer cradle contoured to her default figure.

Jenna is only a SmartBot. She does not breathe, blood does not run in her arteries and veins. She has no arteries or veins, nor a heart, nor anything in the way of organic tissue. She can be replaced in a day—she can be replaced right now. If Melmoth touches “Upgrade,” the capsule lid will seal and lock, all VirtuLinks to Jenna will break, and a courier from GlobalDigital will collect the unit from a cargo bay of Melmoth’s high-rise after delivering a new model to Melmoth himself. It distresses him, how easy replacement would be, as if Jenna were no more abiding than an oldentime car he might decide one morning to trade-in. Seeing her in the capsule is bad enough; the poor thing looks as if she is lying in her coffin. Melmoth does not select “Power Down” on his cerebral menu any more often than he must. Only to update her software does Melmoth resort to pulling Jenna’s plug. Updating, too, disturbs him. In authorizing it, he cannot pretend she is human. [pp. 90-91]”
John Lauricella, 2094

“He finds a basket and lays fish inside it. Charcoal is in a wooden bucket. Enrique lifts it, basket in his other hand, and moves through shadow toward daylight.

A presence makes him turn his head. He sees no one, yet someone is there.

He sets down fish and charcoal. Straightening up, Enrique slips his Bowie knife clear of its sheath. He listens, tries to sense the man’s place. This intruder lies low. Is concealed. Behind those barrels? In that corner, crouched down? Enrique shuts his eyes, holds his breath a moment and exhales, his breath’s movement the only sound, trying to feel on his skin some heat from another body.

Where?

Enrique sends his mind among barrels and sacks, under shelves, behind posts and dangling utensils. It finds no one.

He is hiding. Wants not to be found. Is afraid.

If he lies under a tarpaulin, he cannot see. To shoot blind would be foolish: likely to miss, certain to alert the others.

Enrique steps around barrels, his boots silent on packed sand. Tarps lie parallel in ten-foot lengths, their wheaten hue making them visible in the shadowed space. They are dry and hold dust. All but one lies flat.

There.

Enrique imagines how it will be. To strike through the tarp risks confusion. Its heavy canvas can deflect his blade. But his opponent will have difficulty using his weapon. He might fire point-blank into Enrique’s weight above him, bearing down. To pull the tarpaulin clear is to lose his advantage; he will see the intruder who will see him. An El Norte mercenary with automatic rifle or handheld laser can cut a man in half.

Knife in his teeth, its ivory handle smooth against lips and tongue, Enrique crouches low. Pushing hard with his legs, he dives onto the hidden shape. The man spins free as Enrique grasps, boots slipping on waxed canvas. His opponent feels slight, yet wiry strength defeats Enrique’s hold. He takes his knife in hand and rips a slit long enough to plunge an arm into his adversary’s shrouded panic. Enrique thrusts the blade’s point where he believes a throat must be. Two strong hands clamp his arm and twist against each other rapidly and hard. Pain flares across his skin. Enrique wrests his arm free and his knife flies from his grasp and disappears behind him. He clenches-up and, pivoting on his other hand, turns hard into a blind punch that smashes the hidden face.

The dust of their struggle rasps in Enrique’s throat. His intended killer sucks in a hard breath and Enrique hits him again, then again, each time turning his shoulder into the blow. The man coughs out, “Do not kill me.”

Enrique knows this voice. It is Omar the Turk. [pp. 60-61]”
John Lauricella, 2094

“Julietta’s dark hair is glossy and straight and smells like apples. Armand kneels beside her and holds his head close. Her eyelashes are long and delicately curved in a way people a hundred years ago would have described as buggy whips, a phrase no one uses any¬more because no one understands. In this way knowledge is lost.”
John A. Lauricella, Hunting Old Sammie

“Your statement ... tells a very fine story; but pray, was not your stock a little heavy a while ago? downward tendency? Sort of low spirits among holders on the subject of that stock?"
"Yes, there was a depression. But how came it? who devised it? The 'bears,' sir. The depression of our stock was solely owing to the growling, the hypocritical growling, of the bears."
"How hypocritical?"
""Why, the most montrous of all hypocrites are these bears: hypocrites by inversion; hypocrites in the simulation of things dark instead of bright; souls that thrive, less upon depression, than the fiction of depression; professors of the wicked art of manufacturing depressions; spurious Jeremiahs; sham Heraclituses, who, the lugubrious day done, return, like sham Lazaruses among the beggars, to make merry over the gains got by their pretended sore heads--scoundrelly bears!"
"You are warm against these bears?"
"If I am, it is less from the remembrance of their stratagems as to our stock, than from the persuasion that these same destroyers of confidence, and gloomy philosophers of the stock-market, though false in themselves, are yet true types of most destroyer of confidence and gloomy philosophers, the world over. Fellows who, whether in stocks, politics, bread-stuffs, morals, metaphysics, religion--be it what it may--trump up their black panics in the naturally-quiet brightness, solely with a view to some sort of covert advantage. That corpse of calamity which the gloomy philosopher parades, is but his Good-Enough-Morgan."
"I rather like that," knowingly drawled the youth.

~The Confidence-Man: His Masquerade
Herman Melville

Whoever looks for the writer’s thinking in the words and thoughts of his characters is looking in the wrong direction. Seeking out a writer’s “thoughts” violates the richness of the mixture that is the very hallmark of the novel. The thought of the novelist that matters most is the thought that makes him a novelist.

The thought of the novelist lies not in the remarks of his characters or even in their introspection but in the plight he has invented for his characters, in the juxtaposition of those characters and in the lifelike ramifications of the ensemble they make — their density, their substantiality, their lived existence actualized in all its nuanced particulars, is in fact his thought metabolized.

The thought of the writer lies in his choice of an aspect of reality previously unexamined in the way that he conducts an examination. The thought of the writer is embedded everywhere in the course of the novel’s action. The thought of the writer is figured invisibly in the elaborate pattern — in the newly emerging constellation of imagined things — that is the architecture of the book: what Aristotle called simply “the arrangement of the parts,” the “matter of size and order.” The thought of the novel is embodied in the moral focus of the novel. The tool with which the novelist thinks is the scrupulosity of his style. Here, in all this, lies whatever magnitude his thought may have.

The novel, then, is in itself his mental world. A novelist is not a tiny cog in the great wheel of human thought. He is a tiny cog in the great wheel of imaginative literature.
Finis.”
Philip Roth

“Madame Sosostris, famous clairvoyante,
Had a bad cold, nevertheless
Is known to be the wisest woman in Europe, 45
With a wicked pack of cards. Here, said she,
Is your card, the drowned Phoenician Sailor,
(Those are pearls that were his eyes. Look!)
Here is Belladonna, the Lady of the Rocks,
The lady of situations. 50
Here is the man with three staves, and here the Wheel,
And here is the one-eyed merchant, and this card,
Which is blank, is something he carries on his back,
Which I am forbidden to see. I do not find
The Hanged Man. Fear death by water.”
T.S. Eliot

“I think up to a point people's characters depend on the toilets they have to shut themselves up in every day. You get home from the office and you find the toilet green with mould, marshy: so you smash a plate of peas in the passage and you shut yourself in your room and scream.”
Italo Calvino trans. Tim Parks

“Don’t walk in front of me… I may not follow
Don’t walk behind me… I may not lead
Walk beside me… just be my friend”
Albert Camus

126665 Authors Only — 128 members — last activity Aug 31, 2025 07:54AM
This group is meant for authors only, and members will be accepted if they have formatted, GR-approved GoodReads author profiles. Authors here will ha ...more
31471 THE Group for Authors! — 12967 members — last activity 14 hours, 58 min ago
This is a group for authors to discuss their craft, as well as publishing and book marketing.
No comments have been added yet.