Rob O'Lynn's Blog

Take Time to RestSometimes, a nap just happens. I would ...

 Take Time to RestSometimes, a nap just happens. I would be lying if I said that I had never fallen asleep at my desk. My desk is arranged in such a way that my chair is aligned parallel with a wall. And there have been times when, for some completely unexplained reason, my head nestles against the wall and I drift off to sleep, dreaming, I am sure, of another meeting. Ah, meetings.
But more to the point, my wife and I took our kids on a Disney cruise a few years ago. We got checked in and moved in relatively quickly, enough time that we could change into our swim gear (which, for me, is shorts and a t-shirt) and head up to the pool deck. I found a deck chair in the shade and told my wife that I was going to catch a quick nap before getting some reading in.
Now, I know that it had not been more than a few minutes later when my wife woke me up with a smile on her face to my perturbed frown. "Your snoring is cute, however we need to get ready for dinner." Confused, I asked how long I had been asleep. "About three hours. Guess you needed a nap."
Rest is a theological discipline that is as old as the creation story. In Genesis 2:2-3, we are told that God rested from the work of creation after creating humanity and placing them in the garden. This allowed God time to enjoy the good that God had created, to share rest in the moment. This call to rest from work and enjoy the presence of God is later reflected in Exodus 20 when God calls Israel to rest once a week through worship and communal celebration (20:8-11). They are to reflect the need for rest that God took and to do so through worship to God with one another.
We also see Jesus taking time to rest. In Mark 4, Jesus asked his disciples to sail across the Sea of Galilee so that they could rest after a long day of teaching. While Jesus was asleep in the boat, a storm arose that Jesus quickly silenced so that he could go back to resting (4:35-41). Later, in Mark 6, after his ministry in a Gentile region and the death of John the Baptizer, he asks his disciples to come with him a quiet place so that they could rest and grieve (6:30-32). It was also not uncommon for Jesus to go away for the evening and spend the night in prayer (Mark 6:45-46).
If the incarnate Christ required time to rest, reflect, and recharge, why do we think we can constantly run at full throttle? I am asking this question of myself as much as anyone. When I meet with students for mentoring, I often encourage them to take time to rest and practice solitude. Find a quiet place and dedicate five minutes to God, telling God that you are consecrating that time to be in God's presence. No noise, no distractions, nothing. Just you and God for a few moments. If you fall asleep, consider it a holy nap. As we emerge from the cold of winter into the hustle and bustle of spring, take time to rest.
"For God alone my soul waits in silence, for my hope is from him. He alone is my rock and my salvation, my fortress; I shall not be shaken. On God rests my deliverance and my honor; my mighty rock, my refuge is in God. Trust in him at all times, O people; pour out your heart before him; God is a refuge for us." -- Psalm 62:5-8 (NRSVUE)

Psalm 121: "My Help Comes from the LORD"

This psalm is part of the collection known as the “Songs of Ascent,” a collection (120-134) contained in Book 5 which parallels Deuteronomy in the Pentateuch or the “return from exile” in Israelite history.  The “Songs of Ascent” were traditionally used in what are known as the pilgrimage festivals (Passover, Shavuot and Sukkot) and were often sung as the congregation approached the Temple in Jerusalem.

This particular “Song of Ascent” is known also as a “Song of Trust,” a psalm that declares trust in God.  This trust, which is a relational component, has been formed through the peaks and valley of life, those times of disorientation and re-orientation that chart their way through the Psalms.  This psalm opens with a call-and-response structure.  The opening verse (v. 1) is the question posed by the poet and the liturgist.  Springing up from a lifetime of memories, the poet asks the congregation if they ascent to his question, hoping they hold trust in the same God that he does.  Thus, the natural expression is that “My help comes from YHWH!”
The remaining verses of this “Song of Trust” proclaims three elements of God’s nature that have served as the foundation for that trust.  In these verses, the poet notes that he trusts God’s direction.  The imagery in the first line (v. 3a) is that of God “keeping” the steps of the worshipper, much like a parent who helps a toddler take steps by clasping their hands around the child’s ankles and helping her learn the motion of walking.  The imagery of the remaining three lines (v. 3b-4) is that of God carrying the worshipper while the worshipper slumbers, much like the tales of mythical beasts carrying their wards in their arms or on their backs.
In v. 5-6, the poet notes that he trusts God’s provision.  In the New Revised Standard Version, the phrase “keeps” is repeated in each elemental passage.  Whereas the previous passage focused on God “keeping” the poet’s feet on the correct path, this passage focuses on God “keeping” the poet provided for.  Generally we think of provision as dealing with food or drink, however the tale of Jonah seems to hint in the background here as the poet trusts God to provide shade in the heat and shelter during the night (cf., Jonah 4:6).
In v. 7-8, the poet notes that he trusts God’s protection.  Here we see a more intimate nature of God’s “keeping.”  Drawing from more pastoral imagery, God is the worshipper’s shepherd, laying down in the gateway of the sheep pen, “keeping” the sheep in and “keeping” the thief out.  It is this imagery that inspired Jesus’ “I am the gate” teaching in John 10:7-10.  God does not simply nurse the wounds of the worshipper; God risks God’s own life to “keep” the worshipper safe.  In concluding his words here, the poet articulates that God is worth our trust because God directs, provides and protects us.
Articulating trust in God is easy when times are good and plentiful, yet harder when times are difficult and lean.  This psalm provides a structure for prayer in times when our trust in God is low, when our guilt rises and our faith wanes.  Begin by asking yourself the call of the opening verse: “From where does my help come?”  If you can honestly state that your help comes from God, remind yourself of why you trust God by thanking God for God’s direction, provision and protection.

Writing is...

Writing is one of those processes that, I think, just about everyone thinks they can accomplish.  I mean, you go to any bookstore and see all those glorious books on display?  "Surely, I can do that," you may think to yourself.

Or, thanks to the Internet, almost anyone with a computer can post an essay within a matter of minutes.  (Wait a minute...)  There are, depending on who you ask, over 150 million active blogs readily available for your reading.  (Compare this to over 28 million podcasts, whose numbers are growing at exponential rates.)  There are, literally, blogs or websites about everything.

Yet, what does it mean to be a writer?  And, more deeply, how does one go about writing?  These are fundamental questions, questions that I had not asked myself when I first began writing.  However, after nearly a decade of writing essays, articles, book chapters and a book, here is some advice that I have learned that I hope will encourage or challenge you in your writing.

Writing is a craft that must be nurtured.  One of the things about writing is that is an activity that must be worked at.  Even someone who might be "gifted" at writing cannot survive on talent alone.  I have a book project on the Gospel of Mark that I have been working on for over fifteen years.  I am not sure if it will ever see the light of day.  It, like many other pieces, has become a workshop piece that challenges we as a writer.  In another case, one of my first articles was a simple page piece that sought to share a teaching tactic.  It was abysmal.  Looking back now, as I did the other day, I am both ashamed that I submitted the piece for publication yet also grateful that that particular journal gave me a second chance at publication.Just because I can, does not mean that I should.  Most writers are creative types.  Most creative types are almost always coming up with ideas.  Inspiration hits without warning.  This can be great for the writing process, or it can send us down the rabbit hole into distraction.  Some time ago, I pitched an idea an idea about theological themes in dystopian literature to my friend David Congdon (@dwcongdon), an editor with the University Press of Kansas.  His advice was quite simple: While the idea had merit, did I have the credentials to write it.  He was correct.  I love dystopian literature, however I am not a literature guy.  To date, I have submitted four book proposals that, I assume, have been rejected.  As difficult as it is to accept, there is wisdom in "staying in your lane."What about what works (and what does not and why).  I once proposed an article to a journal on mediating divorces in the congregational setting.  I had written the paper for a graduate class and had received a good grade.  I submitted the paper...and it was rejected.  It was rejected for one reason -- I didn't have any evidence that it would work.  I had never implemented it.  When writing, especially when writing practically, write out of your actual experience.  As I started on my dissertation, I discovered that I was regularly using my developing theory in my preaching.  I just had not named how the process worked yet.  In other articles, I have talked about things that worked and things that have not.  In doing so, it shows that a writer has credibility to speak about this issue.  And in today's marketplace, credibility is everything.I hope this advice helps you as your develop as a writer.  It is a frustrating yet rewarding craft, one that advances thought and action with simple words and passionate minds.

Book Review: "The Witness of Preaching" (3rd edition) by Thomas G. Long

Thomas G. Long, The Witness of Preaching, 3rd ed. (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2016).  280 pp.  $35.00.

[Caution...that 4/5 is a bit misleading.]

To be honest, this is a book in which I agree with about 90% of the content. I have an infinite amount of respect for Tom Long, and reference him repeatedly in my multiple preaching classes. His passion for preaching and depth of wisdom has advanced the study and practice of homiletics in many ways.

That being said, and for as high of a rating that I gave this third edition (which really is the best edition, given the updating on issues like technology, plagiarism and the preacher's spiritual life), I ultimately do not accept Long's concept of "witness" as the paradigm for understanding the preacher's task.

I think to ignore the other paradigms that he discusses (and then dismisses) -- herald, storyteller and pastor -- seriously limits our ability to preach the gospel in a post-Christian society. Yes, this sounds counter-intuitive, given the theological nature of "witness." 

The issue, I have long thought, is two-fold: 
Preaching must be about more than what we have simply "seen and heard" but also point towards transformation, a concept that Long finds deeply problematic to his Reformed approach to the Christian faith.Preaching must, therefore, employ various models and methods in order to effectively preach the gospel in a distracted culture. Heralds (prophets, John the Baptizer), storytellers (Qoheleth, the Gospel writers, Jesus) and pastors (Paul, Peter, Jude) have long advanced the gospel through a variety of communicative forms. Why, then, should contemporary preachers do any less?If only witness was promoted as a "best practice" among a variety of best practices, much like Robert Stephen Reid's "four voices." Then, to me, this would be the homiletics textbook that we both need and deserve.

Note: This review was not solicited.  It was originally posted on my Goodreads page.

Star Trek Films, Ranked from Best to Worst

Yes, I am a Trekkie.  Not quite one that has an accurate cosplay outfit stuffed away in his closet, however that it not to say that I did not build a TNG bridge set in my parents' basement and act out my own stories when I was kid. 

I made what I could out of cardboard, construction paper and markers (i.e., communicator badge, pips, bridge stations) and saved up to buy what I couldn't make (a phaser and tricorder).  I developed my own series and wrote a handful of scripts, improvising other adventures.  Yes, dear tweeps, I was a Star Trek nerd.

Yet, as with the population's general enjoyment of Star Trek, my love of Star Trek waned once I graduated from high school.  I wanted to continue my love affair with the Enterprise and her crew, however the films following First Contact did not help.  Additionally, I never could get into Deep Space Nine (I mean Star Trek is about exploring space...you cannot do that when you are stuck on a space station) or Voyager.  By the time Enterprise came along, I had hidden my love for boldly going where no one had gone before deep within my soul.

Then came the rebooted films from J. J. Abrams.  Old feelings of warmth and enjoyment sprung to the surface of my typically logical soul.  I even began to wonder if my parents had kept any of my old Trek artifacts in their garage.  I went to see this new incarnation of Captain Kirk and company ... and was pleasantly surprised.  I liked what I saw.  Was it spot-on?  No.  Were there (significant) problems?  Absolutely.  Was it better than fan-fiction?  Yes.  And, in the words of ScreenJunkies, "Star Trek is cool again!" 

How the new voyages of the new Starship Enterprise are not the only reason why I am once again finding my joy in Star Trek.  Last year, I reviewed The Gospel According to Star Trek: The Original Crew by Kevin C. Neece.  The first fully faith-based discussion of Gene Roddenberry's sci-fi series brought me humbly before Netfilx to go back and re-watch the entire original series, animated series and original series films.  Now I am proudly and comfortably back in my universe, working through The Next Generation (I am almost finished with Season 7 as of this writing).

So, without any further plot exposition, I offer another ranking: the best and worst of the Star Trek films:

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan  (1982) -- This has it all.  Action, suspense, a genuinely creative sci-fi plot device (the Genesis device) and a compelling villain in Khan (Ricardo Montalban).  Add to this Nicholas Meyer's direction, James Horner's scoring and that scene in Engineering, and you have a film that captures all that Star Trek is meant to be. Star Trek: First Contact  (1996) -- If Q was the great thorn in Captain Picard's side, then the Borg were his one great enemy.  The Borg had spent years ravaging the universe, including the Federation.  In this fun, thrilling time-travel piece, the Enterprise-D crew must prevent the Borg from stopping the first human warp-speed experiment.  In every way, it is made just as well as Star Trek II, which is my only reason for placing it second on this list. Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country  (1991) -- In many ways, this film is a espionage thriller set in space.  Although the original cast is starting to show their age, there is still plenty to be excited about.  From the battle sequences to the "who dunnit" detective story, this is not redemption from the abysmal Star Trek V, but also serves as a great send off the Captain Kirk and his crew. Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home  (1986) -- With Spock in tow, the crew begins making their way home only to discover that Earth is on the brink of destruction when a giant alien Hostess cake shows up and begins playing havoc with our weather patterns.  Back to the past they go again to find ... whales.  Yes, "There be whales here!"  This part is hokey, however watching the crew adapt to the twentieth-century is lighthearted and fun.  In many ways, this film is more akin to the original series than any of the other films. Star Trek: Generations  (1994) -- With the series over, producers rushed to get the TNG crew on the big screen.  As a result, this film feels more like an unproduced two-part arc than a feature film.  However it has some good elements -- the production value is certainly ramped up, Malcolm McDowell's villain is one of the better Trek villains.  The highlight here is the scene between Kirk and Picard, where Kirk has one last adventure and Picard finally learns what it means to be "captain of the Enterprise." Star Trek III: The Search for Spock  (1985) -- Who is the central character of the Original Series?  Some will say it was Kirk, some will say that it was a great ensemble.  I say that Spock was the central character, and has remained so throughout all incarnations of Star Trek.  We see it here.  Kirk and company put everything on the line to rescue Spock from the Genesis planet, reuniting old friends.  Unfortunately, Christopher Lloyd's turn as Klingon villain is wasted on an otherwise incomplete story. Star Trek V: The Final Frontier  (1989) -- Okay.  Pretty much from here on, I am simply listing the films.  This film had two things going for it: 1) it proved the original crew needed one mroe outing, and 2) it gave us Kirk giving a soliloquy on why he was a starship captain.  However it also gave us this awful line: "What does God need with a starship?" Star Trek: The Motion Picture  (1979) -- Riding high off of the success of Star Wars, the Enterprise launches onto the big screen to prove that sci-fi could be a big-budget product for flagship studios.  However, this movie is more Kubric than Spielberg, which makes it really difficult to watch...let alone enjoy.  Still, it is visually compelling and has a deep-theme plot.  Too bad it takes so long to get anywhere. Star Trek: Nemesis  (2002) -- There are only two reasons why this film is "better" than Insurrection: 1) Tom Hardy's breakthrough performance as a genetically-engineered Romulan clone of Picard is worth watching, 2) Data becomes human by making the ultimate sacrifice, and 3) it's not Insurrection. Star Trek: Insurrection  (1998) -- Although Sir Patrick Stewart thought this film offered a more accurate portrayal of Captain Picard's character, especially following the final engagement with the haunting Borg (we see Picard's moral center on full display here), and it is just as visually appealing at First Contact (kudos to Jonathan Frakes in this way on both films), this installment is generally considered to be muddled, slow and lacking the ethical depth presented in other TNG episodes that served as inspiration for this film.You will note that I have not added the Kelvin timeline films to this list.  My reason is simple: the films directed/produced by Abrams are from a new timeline and do not play into the progression of events portrayed in the Original Series, the Next Generation and its "spin-offs" (of which I am not including Discovery).  I enjoy these films, however I think they must stand apart from the canon.  If, however, you are interested in hearing my thoughts, let me know. 

Book Review: "Five-Word Prayers" by Lisa Whittle

Lisa Whittle, 5-Word Prayers: Where to Start When You Don’t Know What to Say to God (Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers, 2017), 164 pp.  $13.99.
Prayer is a mysterious thing, and how God works through prayer is even more mysterious.  Several years ago, I was working in a ministry organization that really made me question my calling in ministry.  I loved the work and (most of) those I worked with.  However my supervisor was anything but a Christian leader.  Her morals were questionable, her work ethic was sketchy and her treatment of her employees was determined by how little she paid you (the more you were paid, the worst you were treated, which included public shaming).  I was a hospital chaplain, and had just come out of a great situation.  I loved where I had worked, however my contract was up and I needed to move on.  So I moved across town and immediately regretted my decision. 
Fast forward about four months to an incredibly draining weekend where I ended by day by being chewed out for ministering to the family of a dying patient.  It was not my unit, however I was the only chaplain available that weekend.  The problem was not that I was on a unit that I was not assigned to (necessarily).  The problem had been that I had agreed to go and minister to them.  By the time I got home, my family was already in bed. Oh, did I forget that I had to be back at 8:00 am the next day.  I collapsed into my recliner and simply prayer, “God, please do something now.”  It was five words, yet it was probably the most heart-felt prayer that I had ever personally prayed.  Five words.
The next day…I was fired.  I am still to this day not sure that “you’re the best floor chaplain that I have” is sufficient reason for firing someone.  But like I said, everything about this lady was highly questionable.  After being let go, I went back to my office to finish my paperwork (it was the deal to get my last paycheck).  I flipped open my phone (yup) and saw that I had a voicemail.  It was the hospital that I had previously worked for, and they were offering me a job!  “Please come to a meeting tonight to hear more details.”  Less than twenty-four hours later, and it seemed that God has answered my prayer.  I would go on to spend 2-1/2 years with that hospital, leaving only to accept my current full-time teaching position.  Five words.
Please do not misunderstand me.  I am not saying that simply praying a simple prayer will solve all of your problems.  What I am saying is that our prayers, especially in difficult times, can be simple prayers—even as simple as five words.  This is the beauty of Whittle’s little book.  It is theologically light, and can border on advocating the very approach to prayer that I am cautioning you against in this review.  However, her “five-word prayers” are practical.  Some of her prayers can be adjusted for more critical moments of life, such as the sudden, tragic death of a loved one (“Please give me strength now” or “I want to trust you.”).  Yet, in for the busy, connected world that we live in, this prayer guide might be just what you need to find guidance from and fulfillment in God.

Books I Read in 2017

I have used Goodreads' feature for the last couple of years to share what I have read in a year.  However, I cannot distinguish specifically what types of books that I have read.  So, here is what I have read categorically in 2017.  I hope you find some inspiration here!

- Fiction

**Margaret Atwood, The Handmaid's Tale*Philip Dick, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?Philip Dick, The Man in the High CastleT.S. Eliot, The Wasteland and Other WritingsJames Hannah, The A to Z of You and Me*Madeline L'Engle, A Wrinkle in TimeJohn LeCarre, Our Kind of TraitorDennis Lehane, Live by NightCormac McCarthy, Child of God*Cormac McCarthy, No Country for Old MenArthur Miller, Broken Glass**George Orwell, 1984Philip Roth, The Plot Against AmericaWilliam Shakespeare, Macbeth*William Shakespeare, Much Ado About NothingWilliam Shakespeare, Romeo and JulietJeff Vandermeer, Annihilation- Biblical Studies

*David Bartlett, Romans*Dave Bland, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, and Song of Solomon*Charles Cousar, Reading Galatians, Philippians and 1 Thessalonians**Peter Enns, The Bible Told Me SoBeverly Gaventa, First and Second ThessaloniansRobert Jewett, The Thessalonian Correspondence Derek Kidner, The Message of EcclesiastesThomas Mann, DeuteronomyBonnie Thurston, Reading Ephesians, Colossians and 2 ThessaloniansN.T. Wright, Galatians and ThessaloniansN.T. Wright, Romans, Part One: Romans 1-8N.T. Wright, Romans, Part Two: Romans 9-16- Education

*Lorrie Blair, Writing a Graduate Thesis or DissertationLeisyte and Wilkesmann, Organizing Academic Work in Higher Education*Stabile and Ershler, Constructivism Revisited in the Age of Social Media*Ernest Stringer, Action ResearchMarshall Welch, Engaging Higher Education- Ministry


*Herring and Elton, Leading Congregations and Nonprofits in a Connected WorldRon Susek, Firestorm**Thomas Tumblin, AdMinistry- Preaching/Communication


*Jeffrey Arthurs, Preaching with VarietyDecker and York, Speaking with Bold AssuranceGonzalez and Jimenez, Pulpito*Hogan and Reid, Connecting with the CongregationEunjoo Mary Kim, Preaching the Presence of God*Marshall McLuhan, Understanding MediaLane Sebring, Preaching Killer SermonsFrank A. Thomas, They Like To Never Quit Praisin' God- Psychology/Leadership

*Brene Brown, Daring Greatly*Angela Duckworth, Grit**Viktor Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning*Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the OppressedSebastian Junger, Tribe- Theology (Systematic, Spiritual)

*Bland and Webb, Creation, Character, and Wisdom*Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Creation and Fall/Temptation**David Congdon, The God Who Saves*Zach Hoag, The Light is WinningKyle Idleman, Grace is Greater*Kelly Kapic, Embodied Hope*C.S. Lewis, A Grief Observed*Kevin C. Neese, The Gospel According to Star TrekJohn Walton, The Lost World of Adam and EveLisa Whittle, 5-Word Prayers*Brian Zahnd, Sinners in the Hands of a Loving God- Miscellaneous

Harriot Castor, Starting Chess*Richard Rothstein, The Color of LawThe books marked with an (*) are the ones that I enjoyed a little more, and the ones marked with an (**) were my favorites from 2017.  What did you read?  Did you read any that I did?  What recommendations do you have?  Leave your comments below or connect with me on Twitter.  And happy reading in 2018!

Book Review: "Grace Is Greater" by Kyle Idleman

Kyle Idleman.  Grace is Greater: God’s Plan to Overcome Your Past, Redeem Your Plan, and Rewrite Your Story.  Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2017.  188 pp.  $15.99.
Grace is a major conversation topic within Christianity.  The front matter of this book alone attests to that: Of the 13 advanced praise statements, 11 are from author who have a book with the word “grace” in the title.  It, honestly, leads one to question why we need another book on grace.  The answer, equally simply enough, is that the doctrine of grace is multi-faceted.  It is wide-ranging and requires a multiplicity of voices to help us understand it.  And, as you will quickly learn through his stories, Idleman is one who is learning what grace is all about.
Following an introductory chapter, the book is divided into three sections.  Each section focuses on a particular area of concern, an area that Idleman argues that “grace is greater” than: mistakes, hurt and circumstances.  The first unit focuses on the mistakes that can separate us from experiencing God’s restorative grace (guilt, brokenness, and regrets).  For me, the chapter that really stood out in this section was the chapter on regret (chapter 3).  In this chapter, Idleman explores the difference between regret and shame, with regret being defined as “feeling bad about something you have or haven’t done” (p. 51) and shame being defined as “feeling bad about who you are or how you think you’re being perceived by God or others” (p. 52).
The second unit focuses on the hurts that can prevent us from experiencing God’s healing grace (wounds, bitterness, vengeance and resentment).  For me, the chapter that really stood out in this section was the chapter on vengeance (chapter 6).  It was a refreshing chapter because of Idleman’s opening words: “If you’re in ministry, some people won’t like you.  At all” (p. 103).  As one who has been burned in ministry before, Idleman’s focus on releasing my rights to hold on to that pain was very enlightening.  Ministers are often quick to speak about grace, yet we move slower than most when it comes to extending it.
The third unit focuses on the circumstances that can derail us from experiencing God’s guiding grace (disappointments, weakness and despair).  For me, the chapter that really stood out in this section was the chapter on weakness (chapter 9).  In a culture that has tried to “Christianize” suffering by adopting cliché mantras like “just pray about it” or “God has a plan for your suffering,” Idleman addresses how these trite views actually devalue the powerfully redemptive grace that God offers us through Christ and the daily indwelling of the Spirit. 
Overall, I really liked this book from Kyle Idleman.  It was thoughtful, humorous, decently researched (often a shortcoming of “Christian living” books) and practical.  In addition to the lack of solid research, “Christian living” books are often impractical.  What I mean is that they sound really good, yet they fail in actually providing instruction on how to integrate their concepts into the life of the reader.  While his book is not as practical as books by, say, Arron Chambers or John Ortberg, Idleman does try to give some ways of integrating his concept of accepting God’s grace.  For example, in the chapter on weakness (chapter 9), he asks the reader to state a weakness.  Then he offers two reflective questions to help the reader process why this is a weakness and how to find strength to overcome the weakness.  Finally, he walks the reader through the process of accepting grace and integrating this into the reader’s life.

Finally, this book would make an excellent discussion topic for a small group or book club study, a recommended read for a “new Christians” class, or even as a guide for a preaching series.  Idleman’s easy-to-listen-to style makes for a quick read and can easily be accommodated for the preacher who is looking for a practical way to speak about such a central doctrine of our religion.

Book Review: "Preaching Killer Sermons" by Lane Sebring

Lane Sebring, Preaching Killer Sermons: How to Create and Deliver Messages that Captivate and Inspire (Centreville, VA: Preaching Donkey, 2016), 191 pp. $12.48.

I took my first official preaching course in the Fall 1999 semester.  In that course, I was introduced to a text that laid the foundation for my communicative practice in preaching, tips and tricks that I still use today.  A decade later, when I taught my first introductory preaching course, I used that same book, Preaching that Connects by Mark Galli and Craig Larson (both, then, journalists with Christianity Today).  Their material was simple, basic, almost common-sense.  It was pulled from a combined decades of journalism, writing stories with punch that related to the everyday reader.  Although not necessarily preachers themselves, they wrote a book that, in my opinion, every preacher must read.  It is not a theory book; it is a mechanics book, yet one that will absolutely help your development.
You see, when it comes to preaching, to the art of crafting sermons, it comes down to 3 “Ds”: design, development and delivery.  Design has to do with the scaffolding or main structure that the preacher chooses to build the sermon on.  The design is the “bones” of the sermon.  Whether it is inductive (moving from general to specific), deductive (moving from specific to general), narrative (following a plot) or some other syllogistic form, all sermons, when deconstructed down to their base parts look exactly the same.  It’s basic rhetorical design, something that has been with us since Aristotle.
Now, development deals with the “stuff” that goes into our weekly sermons: textual commentary, illustrations, points of doctrine, and practical applications.  This is the blood, muscles and tissue of the sermon.  It’s the stuff that keeps our sermon alive long enough to be presented to a congregation, small group or digital audience. 
Then, there is delivery, or the way the sermon or message is presented.  To finish off the anatomy lesson, this is the skin of the sermon.  It’s the presentation, how the sermon looks and sounds to the audience.  If we do our jobs correctly, the audience should come away with a captivating, transformative experience that leads them closer to God and challenges them to better resemble their faith in Christ to their fellow humans.
Most books in preaching, essentially, land in one of these three camps, such as The Four Voices of Preaching by Robert Stephen Reid (design) or Speaking with Bold Assurance by Bert Decker and Hershael York (delivery).  Some, such as Expository Preaching by Harold Bryson, Preach by Mark Dever and Greg Gilbert or The Modern Preacher and the Ancient Text by Sidney Greidanus, will try to land in two of the camps (usually design and development or development and delivery).  And, on scarce, blessed occasions, some will pull off the impossible and land in all three camps, such as classic texts like Preaching by Fred Craddock or The Witness of Preachingby Tom Long or Biblical Preaching by Haddon Robinson.  And when those books come along, they remain mainstays in the preacher’s library.
A new contender has come along that claims to be worthy of your and my attention in at least two of these camps, if not all three.  Enter Lane Sebring and his book Preaching Killer Sermons.  It’s a bold claim to be sure, especially from such a young minister and author.  You see, most of the above books have come from seasoned preachers.  Yet, most of their best works, ironically, came after they left the work of weekly preaching.  Preaching Killer Sermons comes from one who is deeply involved in ministry, as he serves as a minister who preaches each and every week.  There is something deeply comforting in that thought, very ethos-centric.  For in entering into this conversation, we are entering into it with one who is like us, who shares our struggles and our successes, and wants to share out of his common experience in an effort to build us up as we preach the gospel.
Ultimately, Preaching Killer Sermons is best understood as a delivery book.  And it is a fantastic book on sermon delivery.  His discussions on sharing the sermon in a way that relates well to our contemporary cultural context without compromising the integrity of the text, delivery mechanics and being intentional about self-care are absolutely worth the cost of this book.  Even his opening chapter on parsing a boring sermon is spot-on.  As I was reading, I found myself shaking my head because I have been guilty of a sin or two (and I have a doctorate in preaching!).  And if that was all this book was about, I would enthusiastically recommend this book for any preacher, novice or veteran. 
However, Sebring tries to do more in his one-stop shop preaching text.  And therein lies the problem.  As I mentioned above, there are three “Ds” to preaching—design, development and delivery.  Sebring nails delivery.  And, for the most part, he does an appropriately-decent job with development.  His main flaw is in design, for three reasons.  First, he claims no underlying theories are being promoted, yet he alludes to Aristotle’s concept of rhetoric as a basic model for communication (p. 112-113).  Second, his chapter entitled “Putting Your Sermon to Work” sounds like it has been inspired by Haddon Robinson’s book Biblical Preaching.  And third, he presents four “outline” approaches to designing sermons (p. 71-79), most of which have been largely dismissed by educators, communicators and preachers alike due to inability of those methods in producing true learning or transformative spiritual growth.

Fortunately, this is only a small portion of his book.  As I also stated above, the true strength in this book is his material on delivery, material that comes from a preacher who is in the pulpit each and every week and who is connecting with unchurched persons.  So, even with my concerns, this is a book that I would recommend…and maybe even start using as a textbook!

Book Review: 'Listen, Love, Repeat' by Karen Ehan

A few years ago, I sat across from a smiling man who shared a revolutionary idea with me: the whole purpose of our existence is to share God’s love with everyone around us.  Doing so may come in physical expression, in quiet prayer for another, in serving our neighbor, or sharing the gospel with a coworker.  Yet, whatever we do, we must do it in love.  For in doing so, we combat the evil that is present in the world.  That smiling man was Bob Goff, author of the hugely successful devotional book Love Does .  Bob is an internationally known and respected attorney and human rights advocate who advises world leaders, yet he is as friendly as your favorite uncle.  And in the short time that I spent with him, I was humbled and challenged (generally what we called “blessed”) to practice the simple yet profound discipline of love.  Love Does is not groundbreaking in its conceptual framework, yet it is paradigm-shifting in its radical call to practical expression.  Love does the will of God in a broken and hurting world.
Now, this is not a review of Love Does.  However, Goff’s book helps set the context for the book that is the focus of this review—Karen Ehman’s newest volume Listen, Love, Repeat.  It may seem strange for a male writer to review this volume.  To be honest, it is strange.  The included publicity material is from all female reviewers.  And, yet, why is it strange?  I spent one evening reading through several chapters at my local Starbucks while I was waiting on my daughter to finish up her nightly theatre practice.  Before I left, I ordered my daughter a drink for the ride home.  The barrister show the book in my hand and asked me about.  I explained that the focus of the book was about practicing kindness and compassion in the midst of a selfish world.  He thanked me for sharing about the book, stating that he would likely get it and read it himself.
In the same way as Love Does (and Devoted by my friend Arron Chambers), Ehman’s book assumes a couple of things.  First, it assumes (naturally) that you are a follower of Jesus.  Secondly, it assumes that you want to follow Jesus’ command of sharing God’s love and God’s truth with those around you.  And lastly, it assumes that you are not simply going to read this book and then stick it on a shelf; it assumes that you will do what the author recommends. 
In fact, these books—Devoted, Love Does and Listen, Love, Repeat—could serve as a trinity introduction to the basics of practical Christianity.  Devoted could serve as your introduction, giving you the what of the Christian tradition.  Then, you could move on to Love Does and trek along with Goff as he explains why Christians demonstrate love to the world (and don’t we need this right now!).  Then, you could conclude your orientation reading with Listen, Love, Repeat, where you would discover a whole lot of how.  This book is crammed full of practical advice, ranging from recipes to share with your friends to devotional plans to practical challenges for the reader to engage in.  I read Listen, Love, Repeat in two days, really just a few hours.  Yet, what Ehman offers will require a lot of processing, planning and implementing.  However, the lives that can be impacted through her advice and challenges are limitless.
And that is why I liked and highly recommend this book.  I am already thinking back to that conversation that I had with the Starbucks barrister.  It was just a few moments, and we just talked about a book.  Yet, what kind of impact did it have?  What kind of impact will we have if we listen, love and repeat?  That is the challenge presented by Listen, Love, Repeat, a challenge that I hope you will join me in accepting.