Paul Krugman's Blog, page 618

August 3, 2009

In defense of Michelle Malkin

No, really. She's been getting a lot of grief from progressive bloggers for saying that extended unemployment benefits cause higher unemployment, and attributing that view to Larry Katz, who has gone to some pains to say that he believes no such thing.
But while Larry Katz doesn't believe that unemployment has surged because the government has [...:]
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 03, 2009 07:54

August 2, 2009

Dimensionality

A number of commenters on my Michelle Malkin post objected that it's not possible to reduce political views to a one-dimensional, left-right scale.
That's what I would have thought a few years ago. But then I became familiar with the Poole-Rosenthal work on Congressional voting. They use a clever algorithm to jointly map bills and members [...:]
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 02, 2009 14:12

Beyond 101

A lot of people think economics is completely summed up by "Yay free markets! Greed is good!"
But there's a lot more to it - and once you get past the simplest stories, far more nuance.
I've just been reading Jack Hishleifer on the private and social value of information, and a related, more readable (and [...:]
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 02, 2009 13:26

Even-handedness

AP: FACT CHECK: Distortions rife in health care debate:
Opponents of proposals by President Barack Obama and congressional Democrats falsely claim that government agents will force elderly people to discuss end-of-life wishes. Obama has played down the possibility that a health care overhaul would cause large numbers of people to change doctors and insurers.
So Republicans are [...:]
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 02, 2009 13:14

August 1, 2009

Health reform made simple

Kudos to the Times for a story that, for once, emphasizes the remarkable unity of vision health reformers are showing, rather than the squabbles that are an inevitable part of passing major legislation.
The essence is really quite simple: regulation of insurers, so that they can't cherry-pick only the healthy, and subsidies, so that all Americans [...:]
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 01, 2009 13:37

Scaling Michelle Malkin

When I saw that Michelle Malkin will be on the Stephanopoulos panel this week, my first thought was that nobody as far to the left as she is to the right would ever appear on such a panel. But then I started to wonder (a) what I mean by that (b) if it's true.
I don't [...:]
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 01, 2009 13:26

More birther stuff

David Weigel does some more number-crunching, and concludes that as many as three-quarters of Southern whites either asserted that Obama wasn't born in the United States, or at least had doubts.
Btw, Research 2000 is a reputable polling organization - and I hear that other pollsters are finding similar patterns.
Weigel adds one more point:
One thing [...:]
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 01, 2009 09:34

The invisible program

Matthew Yglesias leads us to a commenter at Marginal Revolution who looks at life expectancy and concludes that "semi-socialized medicine" is good for the young but bad for the old. Tyler Cowen made the same argument in the Times a while back:
On average, European systems are relatively good for the young, who are generally healthy [...:]
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 01, 2009 09:05

Growth and unemployment

A few commenters have asked how it's possible to have a recovery with rising unemployment; also there seems to be some confusion about what I meant by saying that the unemployment rate isn't much out of line. So I thought I'd offer a chart - and I learned something in the process.
So here's what economists [...:]
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on August 01, 2009 08:51

July 31, 2009

In defense of Larry Summers

Larry and I have not always seen eye to eye. There is certainly a case against him. But this, from Willem Buiter, is nuts:
Summers is not a monetary economist or macroeconomist. He has never shown any serious interest in researching and understanding the workings of the kind of complex, interdependent dynamic systems that represent the [...:]
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on July 31, 2009 17:32