Geoff Herbach's Blog, page 7
March 9, 2011
I cannot make things with my hands
When I was a kid, I tried to draw. My hands don't work that way, though. My lines veered all over. My circles were egg drops. So frustrating. I really wanted to draw myself in heroic poses: stopping trains, flying, winning ping pong championships against the Chinese team. I never moved much past stick figures, [...]

Published on March 09, 2011 12:28
My kids and I made something yesterday!
Daughter on the camera. Son and I dancing. Another terrible book trailer. Filed under: Stupid Fast, Young Adult Tagged: Book Trailer, Geoff Herbach, Stupid Fast, Young Adult

Published on March 09, 2011 12:28
Indignity of Aging
I am at high risk for a certain kind of cancer. Thus, I am getting a certain kind of test done to my body about a decade before the general population is recommended to do so. This test required me to not eat fruits or vegetables or high fiber of any kind for the last [...]

Published on March 09, 2011 12:28
Post-Colonscopy Grecian Vision of Health
I admit it. I was terrified. All through the night, the rocket fuel fired me like roman candle balls at all angles in the tiled bathroom. There was little sleep. There was shock and awe. But then, at the clinic, I was attached to some drip bag and fed a delicious mood enhancer, which caused [...]

Published on March 09, 2011 12:28
February 18, 2011
Brain Injury?
Martin Amis, who I like a lot as an author, last week suggested on a BBC show that he would only write lit for kids if he had a brain injury. This brain injury would keep him from writing to his true capacity, and so, as a dumber version of himself, he might consider writing for dumb kids (that's my spin at the end of the sentence).
Lots of writers are mad at Martin Amis. I'm not. He didn't exactly suggest that writers for kids are brain damaged (only that he would have to be). He did sort of suggest that kids are dumb, which isn't true at all, but they certainly have some different needs as readers. That doesn't make them dumb. Kids are kids and are not, thank God, adults yet. The fact that Mr. Amis isn't intellectually tooled to write for younger humans neither makes him brilliant nor stupid (I'm positive he likes being sort of a jerk, though -- that's good schtick for his audience).
Point is this: we should write what we have to write. Amis was asked if he'd consider writing for kids. He answered no. He claimed his aspirations. He has to use the entirety of his giant, language loving, reference driven brain, or he isn't producing his work.
I have to write what I'm writing and I'm writing YA fiction right now because I have a story and I have characters I love and I have a couple of first person voices (two brothers, Felton and Andrew) that keep me awake, keep me playing around in notebooks, so curious to know what they will say. I'm writing YA because I remember how important story was to me when I was a teen (Salinger, Knowles, Terry Davis' Vision Quest, Vonnegut... 16 Candles, The Breakfast Club, Ferris Bueller's Day Off -- John Hughes was in his primed pump house when I was a teen), and I have a serious desire to light fires in the same way.
Also, I want to write variations of the classical story arc. I want my characters to change. I do believe in individual transcendence. YA readers like hope.
So, I'd have to get hit on the head pretty hard to write adult literary fiction right now. I don't want to tell stories with largely ambiguous ends, with more worlds falling apart, filled with characters I am cynical about, characters I want to skewer. I spend much of my conscious life feeling cynical about adult behavior. Repeatedly representing that cynicism seems useless to me.
And, young humans who read good stories turn into less crappy adults. I definitely think that. I don't think it happens immediately. There are few golden teen readers who float sweetly into the future due to the understanding they've acquired from story. People need to experience the vagrancies for themselves. But, using myself as an example, in the last several years, I've turned back to Holden's humanity in Salinger (not to mention my absolute love of Franny and Zooey) and to doddering Vonnegut early in Slaughterhouse Five (and even to The Breakfast Club), these most important works to teen me, and I've used them as measuring sticks for adult me, and I've made changes and I am less crappy.
Yes, I find stories for kids to be the most important stories. So, I write for young adults. That's what I have to do. Maybe I'll go back one day to the literary, but it would probably take a hit on the head for me to do so.
Let Martin Amis alone. Just write what you have to write.
Lots of writers are mad at Martin Amis. I'm not. He didn't exactly suggest that writers for kids are brain damaged (only that he would have to be). He did sort of suggest that kids are dumb, which isn't true at all, but they certainly have some different needs as readers. That doesn't make them dumb. Kids are kids and are not, thank God, adults yet. The fact that Mr. Amis isn't intellectually tooled to write for younger humans neither makes him brilliant nor stupid (I'm positive he likes being sort of a jerk, though -- that's good schtick for his audience).
Point is this: we should write what we have to write. Amis was asked if he'd consider writing for kids. He answered no. He claimed his aspirations. He has to use the entirety of his giant, language loving, reference driven brain, or he isn't producing his work.
I have to write what I'm writing and I'm writing YA fiction right now because I have a story and I have characters I love and I have a couple of first person voices (two brothers, Felton and Andrew) that keep me awake, keep me playing around in notebooks, so curious to know what they will say. I'm writing YA because I remember how important story was to me when I was a teen (Salinger, Knowles, Terry Davis' Vision Quest, Vonnegut... 16 Candles, The Breakfast Club, Ferris Bueller's Day Off -- John Hughes was in his primed pump house when I was a teen), and I have a serious desire to light fires in the same way.
Also, I want to write variations of the classical story arc. I want my characters to change. I do believe in individual transcendence. YA readers like hope.
So, I'd have to get hit on the head pretty hard to write adult literary fiction right now. I don't want to tell stories with largely ambiguous ends, with more worlds falling apart, filled with characters I am cynical about, characters I want to skewer. I spend much of my conscious life feeling cynical about adult behavior. Repeatedly representing that cynicism seems useless to me.
And, young humans who read good stories turn into less crappy adults. I definitely think that. I don't think it happens immediately. There are few golden teen readers who float sweetly into the future due to the understanding they've acquired from story. People need to experience the vagrancies for themselves. But, using myself as an example, in the last several years, I've turned back to Holden's humanity in Salinger (not to mention my absolute love of Franny and Zooey) and to doddering Vonnegut early in Slaughterhouse Five (and even to The Breakfast Club), these most important works to teen me, and I've used them as measuring sticks for adult me, and I've made changes and I am less crappy.
Yes, I find stories for kids to be the most important stories. So, I write for young adults. That's what I have to do. Maybe I'll go back one day to the literary, but it would probably take a hit on the head for me to do so.
Let Martin Amis alone. Just write what you have to write.
Published on February 18, 2011 04:35
Geoff Herbach's Blog
- Geoff Herbach's profile
- 226 followers
Geoff Herbach isn't a Goodreads Author
(yet),
but they
do have a blog,
so here are some recent posts imported from
their feed.
