Daniel Radosh's Blog, page 72
November 18, 2010
danielradosh: @jaketapper But yes 6/09 Qs show you can present/consider all sides. didn't mean to suggest otherwise.
danielradosh: @jaketapper But yes 6/09 Qs show you can present/consider all sides. didn't mean to suggest otherwise.
Published on November 18, 2010 13:05
danielradosh: @jaketapper In other words, when we don't have good evidence, shouldn't we use a court where we can use bad evidence? My point xactly.
danielradosh: @jaketapper In other words, when we don't have good evidence, shouldn't we use a court where we can use bad evidence? My point xactly.
Published on November 18, 2010 13:04
danielradosh: @jaketapper Will be watching for equivalent of "Do U think w/200 people killed this does show cases should be tried in mil commissions?"
danielradosh: @jaketapper Will be watching for equivalent of "Do U think w/200 people killed this does show cases should be tried in mil commissions?"
Published on November 18, 2010 13:01
danielradosh: .@jaketapper Not defending WH "all politics" spin but Q unmistakably endorses underlying "not-guilty verdict=failure for crim court" CW. No?
danielradosh: .@jaketapper Not defending WH "all politics" spin but Q unmistakably endorses underlying "not-guilty verdict=failure for crim court" CW. No?
Published on November 18, 2010 12:57
danielradosh: @jaketapper Sure, along with almost Everyone Who Counts. That's the nature of conventional wisdom. And you clearly endorsed it.
danielradosh: @jaketapper Sure, along with almost Everyone Who Counts. That's the nature of conventional wisdom. And you clearly endorsed it.
Published on November 18, 2010 12:50
danielradosh: Shorter @jaketapper on Ghailani http://bit.ly/cxwb89: But if we let juries find people not guilty, how will we keep them locked up forever?!
danielradosh: Shorter @jaketapper on Ghailani http://bit.ly/cxwb89: But if we let juries find people not guilty, how will we keep them locked up forever?!
Published on November 18, 2010 12:40
danielradosh: @mileskahn @timcarvell. In Brett Favre's case, a dustbroom.
danielradosh: @mileskahn @timcarvell. In Brett Favre's case, a dustbroom.
Published on November 18, 2010 12:29
danielradosh: @poniewozik @lizzwinstead I would think Tarzian?
danielradosh: @poniewozik @lizzwinstead I would think Tarzian?
Published on November 18, 2010 12:04
danielradosh: @real_kaplan "You all"? Nobody invited ME on the cruise? Obviously THEY all sold out. Fuckin' sellouts.
danielradosh: @real_kaplan "You all"? Nobody invited ME on the cruise? Obviously THEY all sold out. Fuckin' sellouts.
Published on November 18, 2010 09:07
danielradosh: @johntdrake So... what geeks usually live on.
danielradosh: @johntdrake So... what geeks usually live on.
Published on November 18, 2010 09:00
Daniel Radosh's Blog
- Daniel Radosh's profile
- 9 followers
Daniel Radosh isn't a Goodreads Author
(yet),
but they
do have a blog,
so here are some recent posts imported from
their feed.

