Daniel Radosh's Blog, page 72

November 18, 2010

danielradosh: @jaketapper But yes 6/09 Qs show you can present/consider all sides. didn't mean to suggest otherwise.

danielradosh: @jaketapper But yes 6/09 Qs show you can present/consider all sides. didn't mean to suggest otherwise.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 18, 2010 13:05

danielradosh: @jaketapper In other words, when we don't have good evidence, shouldn't we use a court where we can use bad evidence? My point xactly.

danielradosh: @jaketapper In other words, when we don't have good evidence, shouldn't we use a court where we can use bad evidence? My point xactly.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 18, 2010 13:04

danielradosh: @jaketapper Will be watching for equivalent of "Do U think w/200 people killed this does show cases should be tried in mil commissions?"

danielradosh: @jaketapper Will be watching for equivalent of "Do U think w/200 people killed this does show cases should be tried in mil commissions?"
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 18, 2010 13:01

danielradosh: .@jaketapper Not defending WH "all politics" spin but Q unmistakably endorses underlying "not-guilty verdict=failure for crim court" CW. No?

danielradosh: .@jaketapper Not defending WH "all politics" spin but Q unmistakably endorses underlying "not-guilty verdict=failure for crim court" CW. No?
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 18, 2010 12:57

danielradosh: @jaketapper Sure, along with almost Everyone Who Counts. That's the nature of conventional wisdom. And you clearly endorsed it.

danielradosh: @jaketapper Sure, along with almost Everyone Who Counts. That's the nature of conventional wisdom. And you clearly endorsed it.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 18, 2010 12:50

danielradosh: Shorter @jaketapper on Ghailani http://bit.ly/cxwb89: But if we let juries find people not guilty, how will we keep them locked up forever?!

danielradosh: Shorter @jaketapper on Ghailani http://bit.ly/cxwb89: But if we let juries find people not guilty, how will we keep them locked up forever?!
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 18, 2010 12:40

danielradosh: @mileskahn @timcarvell. In Brett Favre's case, a dustbroom.

danielradosh: @mileskahn @timcarvell. In Brett Favre's case, a dustbroom.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 18, 2010 12:29

danielradosh: @poniewozik @lizzwinstead I would think Tarzian?

danielradosh: @poniewozik @lizzwinstead I would think Tarzian?
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 18, 2010 12:04

danielradosh: @real_kaplan "You all"? Nobody invited ME on the cruise? Obviously THEY all sold out. Fuckin' sellouts.

danielradosh: @real_kaplan "You all"? Nobody invited ME on the cruise? Obviously THEY all sold out. Fuckin' sellouts.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 18, 2010 09:07

danielradosh: @johntdrake So... what geeks usually live on.

danielradosh: @johntdrake So... what geeks usually live on.
 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on November 18, 2010 09:00

Daniel Radosh's Blog

Daniel Radosh
Daniel Radosh isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Daniel Radosh's blog with rss.