Ask the Author: Ben Marcus
“I'll be answering questions this month for the paperback publication of Leaving the Sea. Fire away.
—Ben Marcus” Ben Marcus
—Ben Marcus” Ben Marcus
Answered Questions (28)
Sort By:
An error occurred while sorting questions for author Ben Marcus.
Ben Marcus
In the New York Times today (Nov. 7, 2014), the inestimably great writer Joy Williams, reviewing Denis Johnson's new novel, has this to say:
"A writer should write in such a way that nobody can be ignorant of the world and that nobody may say that he is innocent of what it is all about. ...Life is ludicrous and full of cruel and selfish distractions. Honor is elusive and many find the copious ingestion of drugs necessary. Our ignorance is infinite and our sorrows fearful. We have made an unutterable waste of this world, and our passage through it is bitter and unheroic. Still, the horror can at times be illuminating, and it is necessary that the impossible be addressed."
I don't have much to add beyond that.
"A writer should write in such a way that nobody can be ignorant of the world and that nobody may say that he is innocent of what it is all about. ...Life is ludicrous and full of cruel and selfish distractions. Honor is elusive and many find the copious ingestion of drugs necessary. Our ignorance is infinite and our sorrows fearful. We have made an unutterable waste of this world, and our passage through it is bitter and unheroic. Still, the horror can at times be illuminating, and it is necessary that the impossible be addressed."
I don't have much to add beyond that.
Ben Marcus
There was a time, when I was 17 or 18, that surrealist painting felt like a huge revelation, and relief. A door opened to a massive territory that I realized I also contained within me, but hadn't known it was ok to release. Surrealism felt immensely liberating, funny, weird, heartbreaking. For a while I could not get enough of it. In writing, Donald Barthelme's work had a similar effect. Incredibly liberating to read.
Ben Marcus
Thank you!
I suppose I do need to make myself feel all sorts of things. I have a lot of doubt when I'm working, and I give up on projects probably too often. If I don't care about something I'm working on, it's ridiculous to think that anyone else will. So I dress things up, change them, destroy them, until they look pretty enough to attack. I guess the whole process of starting a new book is a kind of courtship with myself — but I'm not a very fun person to date.
I suppose I do need to make myself feel all sorts of things. I have a lot of doubt when I'm working, and I give up on projects probably too often. If I don't care about something I'm working on, it's ridiculous to think that anyone else will. So I dress things up, change them, destroy them, until they look pretty enough to attack. I guess the whole process of starting a new book is a kind of courtship with myself — but I'm not a very fun person to date.
Alycia K
Not a very fun person? That's quite unfortunate, I suppose, but it depends on the person. Some define reading and writing as the best kind of fun, in
Not a very fun person? That's quite unfortunate, I suppose, but it depends on the person. Some define reading and writing as the best kind of fun, in which case you must be a super fun guy! I might be selfish for asking another question, but while I have you, what makes you write? Is it just out of habit now?
...more
Oct 21, 2014 07:10AM · flag
Oct 21, 2014 07:10AM · flag
Ben Marcus
I would add The German Picturesque, by Jason Schwartz, to this list. Published a decade ago, soon to be reprinted. It is mysterious, menacing, gorgeous, and baffling in the best possible way. A genre unto itself, like nothing I've read before.
Ben Marcus
I don't see why we'd want to avoid it. Some of this is semantical, anyway. To me, there's a kind of emotional autobiography sometimes in what I write. It's rarely explicit. Even if the story is fantastical, and beyond the realm of explicit possibility, I hope it's driven by real feelings, and there's always going to be a link back to the writer in some way.
Ben Marcus
This answer contains spoilers…
(view spoiler)[Hey Manuel:
I'm afraid I don't know what "language's reduction-to-concept function" means.
Sorry!
Ben (hide spoiler)]
I'm afraid I don't know what "language's reduction-to-concept function" means.
Sorry!
Ben (hide spoiler)]
Ben Marcus
This answer contains spoilers…
(view spoiler)[When you answer a question on Goodreads, there is an option to mark the answer as a spoiler. I think I'll do that here, not because I will be revealing key points of plot that, once known, will ruin the book for people, but because my answer might spoil some people's sense of me. I don't think I could ever be obsessed or as ridiculously well-versed in grammar as Lutz or Wallace. My spoiler is that I'm a sounder-outer. I rely on my ear, or the silent device that hears imagined language. My rules are all sub-verbal. I tend to be able to obey the rules of grammar, if that's what's called for, but I usually forget the names of tenses. I do keep grammar books with me and I do consult them regularly, in case there's something specific I need to learn. (hide spoiler)]
Ben Marcus
I got into weather in kind of a backwards way, during a youthful fascination with boredom. I wrote a whole bad novel in school called Secret Weather. It hurts to even remember it. For some reason, with little skill and no experience, I thought I should try to make writing even harder for myself, and this involved taking on the notoriously boring topic of weather. Of course weather is not boring at all — it is just boring to talk about. Anyway, it got into my language, and then it just became part of some sort of engine that sometimes turns on.
Ben Marcus
I do my best to work when I'm not teaching. I can usually find a bunch of hours in the week. Harder for me is working when I don't have anything I am excited about, like, uh, now. If I don't feel obsessed, I'd just rather do something else: make a dough, go two-wheeling. And yet I know that I will most likely only become obsessed through work. That's how I'll discover what I most want to do, hacking at nothing. I tend to give advice about this that I don't follow myself. Work anyway. Work relentlessly. Write something obviously terrible just to get some writing done. Then you can claw at until it's pretty, or ugly in a pretty way.
Ben Marcus
Oh, superfoods. Bitter and repulsive powders that carry medicinal amounts of vitamins and nutrients. I guess I still dabble. But I prefer real and tasty food, until something better comes along. As to no salt, no oil, and no sugar? No way. I don't want to live pleasure free. Even if pleasure is a trap that will kill us.
Ben Marcus
Sure.
THE FUN PARTS — Sam Lipsyte
TWILIGHT OF THE SUPERHEROES — Deborah Eisenberg
EVERYTHING RAVAGED, EVERYTHING BURNED — Wells Tower
GOLD BOY, EMERALD GIRL — Yiyun Li
ONE HUNDRED APOCALYPSES — Lucy Corin
AMERICAN INNOVATIONS — Rivka Galchen
MINOR ROBBERIES — Deb Olin Unferth
THE FUN PARTS — Sam Lipsyte
TWILIGHT OF THE SUPERHEROES — Deborah Eisenberg
EVERYTHING RAVAGED, EVERYTHING BURNED — Wells Tower
GOLD BOY, EMERALD GIRL — Yiyun Li
ONE HUNDRED APOCALYPSES — Lucy Corin
AMERICAN INNOVATIONS — Rivka Galchen
MINOR ROBBERIES — Deb Olin Unferth
Ramon
Thanks for these, Sir! (You answering my question: feels so surreal!)
Can you please please name 3 more collections to make the list a set of 10 collec Thanks for these, Sir! (You answering my question: feels so surreal!)
Can you please please name 3 more collections to make the list a set of 10 collections? (If it's not too much to ask.) ...more
Oct 09, 2014 08:36AM · flag
Can you please please name 3 more collections to make the list a set of 10 collec Thanks for these, Sir! (You answering my question: feels so surreal!)
Can you please please name 3 more collections to make the list a set of 10 collections? (If it's not too much to ask.) ...more
Oct 09, 2014 08:36AM · flag
Ben Marcus
Hey Tommy,
Hm. I like the idea of voraciously consuming etymologies and philosophies, but I probably side with the first option. Blind groping, unintentional trajectories, mistakes.
Thanks for the question.
Ben
Hm. I like the idea of voraciously consuming etymologies and philosophies, but I probably side with the first option. Blind groping, unintentional trajectories, mistakes.
Thanks for the question.
Ben
deleted user
Thank you so much for responding to the question. I'll admit that I haven't read all your published work (only "Notable American Women" and half of "T
Thank you so much for responding to the question. I'll admit that I haven't read all your published work (only "Notable American Women" and half of "The Age of Wire and String", so far; though I own "The Flame Alphabet" and "The Anchor Book of New American Short Stories", but haven't gotten very far into them yet), and I've experienced your use of language as poetic and narrative while also solipsistically and universally *intense*, and that alone is amazing, to say the absolute least. Though, in addition, I really like the idea of the bravery (if that's fair to say) of the "blind groping", that I certainly wouldn't call "mistakes", but more akin to reasonable absurdism. I understand it may be so far in the past for you now, but what I like so much about "Notable American Women" (and its clear influences/"practice" [not to be disrespectful] in "The Age of Wire and String") is the focus on language and linguistics as the embodied soul-ish self-ish-ness. I really love the way that you wrote about a cult-ish reality while flourishing throughout the carnal existence. It felt universal and specific, and I think that's what I meant with my question. A wonder at whether you reached out towards that kind of writing with a hope, or whether you had some kind of plethora of ideas and realizations that you had to pare down into a tangible piece of art. Though I'm realizing it's probably always a reach for all artists, while more of a hope for (us) consumers (of art) that there is a deeper and broader understanding that has been diluted and cropped into production and publication.
...more
Oct 08, 2014 03:41PM · flag
Oct 08, 2014 03:41PM · flag
Ben Marcus
Yes.
I wanted to leave it there, but Goodreads wouldn't let me. But the complications that arise from our own constant assessments of how we feel are deeply fascinating to me, and the source of a tremendous amount of tension and drama.
So, yes.
I wanted to leave it there, but Goodreads wouldn't let me. But the complications that arise from our own constant assessments of how we feel are deeply fascinating to me, and the source of a tremendous amount of tension and drama.
So, yes.
Ben Marcus
My doubt grows and gets fat every day. It is a near constant. Only when I'm actually typing does it subside for a bit. But your first question: how do I convince myself that my experience is good enough to be written about. Honestly I don't want to write too directly from my experience. I want the writing to be a new experience, some concoction that creates something new, using old and dull pieces of me. I'm not a big fan of writing too directly about stuff that's happened to me, but writing makes it into a new thing anyway, so this is something that doesn't worry me so much.
Ben Marcus
I do my best not to think about the distinction between kinds of writing, because I'd like to work in many modes, and maybe fuse them all, or just forget that there are modes. I do think transparency and momentum have their thrills, but there's something immensely appealing, to me, about complex, mind warping sentences that are necessarily slower at the narrative level. After I finished writing LEAVING THE SEA, I wrote a short piece called "Notes from the Hospital" that swung back the other way, I guess. Right now I'm looking to attempt both things at once.
Ben Marcus
Steven: Love that Beckett quote. So is it, as you ask, a necessary evil to feel that language is self-defeating? I doubt it. It's pretty easy never to think of it, to just open our mouths and freely moan all over each other. Self-consciousness about the limitations of language is a kind of curse. But Beckett made it pretty funny, too.
Ben Marcus
Hey Robin, it's a really good question. I think it's a great time for new forms of distribution. But is it a great time for sheer interest in writing as an art form? So hard to say. The people who do care about it care as if their lives depended on it. Maybe it's easier than ever for us to find our few readers, but the harder question is how to connect to those readers who don't explicitly know that they'll like something unusual or innovative. Self-publishing has come a long way from its vain roots, but curation of some kind still seems to offer a sense of assurance to a lot of people. Can these forces be combined?
Ben Marcus
Thanks, Dan. It's been a while since Notable American Women came out, so my memory is probably suspect. But I'm pretty sure I wrote some passages of that book quickly. The thicker, weirder sentences take a lot of labor. There's no way to just spew that stuff out, though I wish I could. I guess I do a lot of fine-tuning and cutting, until things start to sound ok. I am ridiculously slow.
Ben Marcus
Are any birds real, if they are in fiction? I'm not sure why my birds would seem less real than some other fiction writer's birds. How does one add reality to imaginary birds? I'd like to know.
Ben Marcus
I don't. That way no one gets killed, no one is harmed, no one grows sad or uncomfortable. I don't think I can assist understanding, or enjoyment, with some magic sentence or two.
About Goodreads Q&A
Ask and answer questions about books!
You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.
See Featured Authors Answering Questions
Learn more





