♥Glitter in the Air♥ ’s comment > Likes and Comments

You asked me to correct you if you were wrong, so I will. I am not a Twilight hater. I just got annoyed with Bella's flakiness. I learned a long time ago from someone I can't remember that if a character can't get a passionate response from the reader, then the author is doing a good job. Maybe that is what this was. She sure did a great job of getting me to hate/love Bella's character. But, overall, I liked the books.

I still don't know why some say SM has a flagrant use of the thesaurus, while others say she needed to learn how to pick one up and use it. Which is it? Did she use too many or not enough?

And what makes her such a BAD writer? I know she is nothing like Ayn Rand or even J.K. Rowling, but what is it? Could it be her editors fault?
I'm REALLY, REALLY curious what you all mean by that. It was a page-turner, easy to read, and all that. I don't see it. What is a "bad writer"?
Thanks in advance.

*Can get a passionate response...

Oh and I purposely put this here as a discussion and n the breaking dawn book review page. I think I did anyway. Still don't know my way around or the things that annoy long-time members, etc. I won't do it again. I just wanted to get a discussion going and wasn't sure which place would garner better results. Now I know. Thanks.