12,735 books
—
10,846 voters
Lize
https://www.goodreads.com/madameurushiol
read
(1233)
currently-reading (2)
to-read (171)
on-hand (129)
2020 (60)
nonfiction (58)
2021 (57)
2014 (52)
2019 (49)
2013 (46)
2017 (46)
history (44)
currently-reading (2)
to-read (171)
on-hand (129)
2020 (60)
nonfiction (58)
2021 (57)
2014 (52)
2019 (49)
2013 (46)
2017 (46)
history (44)
food-and-drink
(36)
childhood-favorites (35)
2018 (32)
2011 (30)
biographical (29)
social-sciences (28)
2015 (27)
2022 (25)
deeply-strange (21)
favorites (17)
psychology (17)
2012 (14)
childhood-favorites (35)
2018 (32)
2011 (30)
biographical (29)
social-sciences (28)
2015 (27)
2022 (25)
deeply-strange (21)
favorites (17)
psychology (17)
2012 (14)
Cuisine cannot exist without the free and fair movement of ingredients, ideas, and people. Deliciousness is an undeniable benefit of immigration. When people move around, food gets better.


“The so-called paradox of freedom is the argument that freedom in the sense of absence of any constraining control must lead to very great restraint, since it makes the bully free to enslave the meek. The idea is, in a slightly different form, and with very different tendency, clearly expressed in Plato.
Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”
― The Open Society and Its Enemies
Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”
― The Open Society and Its Enemies

“I always hated those classic kid movies like Old Yeller or The Yearling where the beloved pet dies. What would be so wrong with having those damn kids learn their lessons about mortality from watching Grandpa kick? Then at least the dog would be around to comfort them.”
― Walking in Circles Before Lying Down
― Walking in Circles Before Lying Down

“Whether he is an artist or not, the photographer is a joyous sensualist, for the simple reason that the eye traffics in feelings, not in thoughts.”
―
―

“Moving parts in rubbing contact require lubrication to avoid excessive wear. Honorifics and formal politeness provide lubrication where people rub together. Often the very young, the untravelled, the naive, the unsophisticated deplore these formalities as "empty," "meaningless," or "dishonest," and scorn to use them. No matter how "pure" their motives, they thereby throw sand into machinery that does not work too well at best.”
―
―

For fans of the BookCrossing site (bookcrossing.com) who prefer not to have too many rules!

A group to discuss books and topics mentioned on Books on the Nightstand, a blog and podcast about books and reading.

Join bestselling and award winning author Margaret Atwood for a discussion group in celebration of the paperback release of her novel The Year of the ...more
Lize’s 2022 Year in Books
Take a look at Lize’s Year in Books. The good, the bad, the long, the short—it’s all here.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Adult Fiction, Art, Biography, Children's, Classics, Contemporary, Cookbooks, Ebooks, Fantasy, Fiction, Historical fiction, History, Horror, Memoir, Mystery, Non-fiction, Paranormal, Philosophy, Poetry, Psychology, Religion, Science fiction, Suspense, Spirituality, Thriller, Travel, Young-adult, and social-history
Polls voted on by Lize
Lists liked by Lize