Q&A with Laurie R. King discussion
Where did you get the idea?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Mike
(new)
Aug 19, 2012 03:20PM

reply
|
flag


And as an author, do you find that limits you? Obviously, Holmes at 65 can't plausibly do things that he did at 25....


If I'd been free to choose an age for Holmes, not just the year Conan Doyle was finished with him, I'd probably have made him a few years younger, maybe in his early fifties rather than (I think?) 57.
Too, my husband was 30 years older than I, and although the character of Holmes was not patterned on him in any way other than age, it did give me a different perspective of how a relationship with such disparity is affected by that gap. But in fact, the limitations are few.
Too, my husband was 30 years older than I, and although the character of Holmes was not patterned on him in any way other than age, it did give me a different perspective of how a relationship with such disparity is affected by that gap. But in fact, the limitations are few.
Raissa wrote: "I've always adored Sherlock Holmes so I can see why you would write a character who ended up married to him. I remember you wrote in your intro to the collected Holmes stories that Watson was neces..."
I'm not sure that Russell is much of a common touch, although because you follow her inner thoughts, she may be more appealing than the somewhat fact-oriented Watson.
I'm not sure that Russell is much of a common touch, although because you follow her inner thoughts, she may be more appealing than the somewhat fact-oriented Watson.

Laurie, Laurie, Laurie, Holmes was 54 when he met Russell, so in 1924 he is 63, and will turn 64 just after the end of Garment of Shadows. You always get that wrong for some reason, Laurie. **walking away shaking her head**
Alice (here known as Wright)
Oh yes, thank you Alice, as you say, I always get that wrong. He's so much younger than I remember...