sistv bookworms discussion
January
>
Chapters 11 - 20
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Rhi
(new)
Jan 21, 2009 05:01AM

reply
|
flag


He began to feel the danger of paying Elizabeth too much attention.
I made a note in my book about how he can't help it even if she's of a "much lower class", she's irresistible. I find myself wanting to be her friend too.

Jane Austen's original title for the novel was First Impressions. What role do first impressions play in this book so far?
Are you quick to make first impressions?

Just some discussion..... :)

I agree with you...many impressions are based solely on their social status. At times it doesn't seem as if anyone takes into account good character, humor, or any other qualities.
At times I do admit that I have made quick judgment calls on adults...and found out later, much like Elizabeth, that I was totally wrong. Like you Heather, I don't judge the kids that way either.

Jane Austen's original title for the novel was First Impressions. What role do first impressions play in this book so far?
Are you quick to ma..."
I'm finding myself quickly forming impressions of the characters from the little bit I've seen of them thus far...but there's been enough hints dropped that I know things aren't going to work out like I think they are...
I have the feeling that something will be revealed, especially concerning the whole situation between Darcy and the other guy (can't remember his name right now).

So much of this is a class issue too. I'm sure it wasn't helped by a society in which "manners" and etiquette governed so much of what you could and couldn't say to people...
Part of me, despite disliking Mrs. Bennett, can't help but feel sorry for her. After all, she's simply trying to make sure that her daughters will all be provided for in the future once she and Mr. Bennett are dead. In all practicality, looking for husbands with money who will take care of them would probably be my main concern as well. Miss Lucas, once she becomes engaged to Mr. Collins (what an annoying character -- and there's something shifty going on there, I think) -- is awfully realistic about the entire situation. She knows she is no great beauty and simply wants a comfortable future. She knows Mr. Collins will give her that. It's sad...

doesn't it make you sad to realize that women born during this time were really limited as to who they could choose from to marry? Not only that but to settle...we marry for love (most of us) but for them it really was a matter or life or poverty!!

doesn't it make you sad to realize that women born during this time were really limited as to who they could choose from to marry? Not only that but to settle...we marry for love (most of us) but ..."
and if you refused to settle, then you were labeled with all types of names and sometimes even institutionalized.
the farther I get through the novel, though, the more I'm torn at times in my opinion of Elizabeth. She's sometimes too negative and quick to find fault in others; and when you set that up against Jane's idealism, it really shows.

Elizabeth is very headstrong...Mr. Bennett has allowed her way too much freedom in expressing herself freely, maybe?

That's possible -- and I'm quite surprised that both parents would profess to like / dislike Elizabeth more / less than their other children. But with Elizabeth, I think it's really a case of Austen playing her against Jane, so that we get two very opposing character views.

Elizabeth. She's sometimes too negative and quick to find fault in others; and when you set that up against Jane's idealism, it really shows.
100% Audrey.
I think thats one of the reasons i love her most though, because she is a heroine who is actually so life like, but still so loveable.
i know i am always quick to jump to opinions about everyone and everything, i love that austen didn't feel the need to make her so completely unrealistic. she has flaws.
100% Audrey.
I think thats one of the reasons i love her most though, because she is a heroine who is actually so life like, but still so loveable.
i know i am always quick to jump to opinions about everyone and everything, i love that austen didn't feel the need to make her so completely unrealistic. she has flaws.

On an entirely different note this book reminded me of the importance of letter writing and that I have to do more of it. Did anyone else think of this?

yes it did, but 84 Charing Cross Road is the book to read for letter writing!! The letters in this book will bring about many emotions and most of all make you want to take up paper and pen again instead of a keyboard!!


I think this is spot on. Mrs. Bennet's main objective is making sure her children have married well, so anyone who makes this difficult would be seen as a trial. Mr. Bennet seems more concerned with whether his children are intelligent and make sensible choices, perhaps assuming that a good marriage will inevitably follow.

I agree! I loved 84 Charing Cross Road. I'd recommend the movie, too. I hope this tangent is okay, I wanted to mention the other two books that make me want to start writing letters regularly again - Possession by A.S. Byatt (it's very dense prose and there are a couple places where it's slow, but it's a worthwhile read nonetheless, I ended up really enjoying it. And the letters are wonderful.)
Also, The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society. It actually reminded me a lot of 84 Charing Cross Road, for several reasons. We read it for my local bookgroup and one of the first things that everyone mentioned was feeling a strong desire to buy stationery and resurrect the lost art of letter writing.



What is so sad is that they never really were allowed to spend any "quality" time with each other without it being frowned upon. Look at what happened to Marianne in Sense and Sensibility when she let her heart rule all of her emotions. I am more like Marianne and could not fathom marrying someone so quickly and without much conversation as Charlotte Lucas did when she married Mr. Collins!! And if you notice, it wasn't until Elizabeth was able to spend real quality time with Darcy at Pemberly that she realized she had misjudged his character. I made a note in one of those chapters concerning this visit that I thought Darcy was extremely SHY and to cover up for that he came across pompous and proud. What do you think?

i would very much agree with that staci. perhaps more with renae in terms of his introvertness. i think he's very secure in himself, but he just doesn't need to flaunt that around publicly.
which is why he comes across as standoffish.
maybe what people percieve as arrogant, is actually awkward.
i have read possession too tara! great letters :)
which is why he comes across as standoffish.
maybe what people percieve as arrogant, is actually awkward.
i have read possession too tara! great letters :)

shy 1 (sh)
a. Drawing back from contact or familiarity with others; retiring or reserved.
b. Marked by reserve or diffidence:
3. Distrustful; wary: shy of strangers.
I think he fits them both!!!

What is so sad is that they never really we..."
I think that does capture Darcy fairly well. I just think he has trouble relating to people that he doesn't know with any amount of ease -- and that's such a common thing, but one that can be so easily mistaken.
And on a totally different note: Lady Catherine. Ugh. I think what killed me was how almost everyone (with the exception of Elizabeth -- I think she was pretty much the only one until the end) felt so GRATEFUL that she CONDESCENDED to speak to them and spend time in their presence. Really hammered home the entire class issues at work in the novel, I thought.

I agree wholeheartedly with you on this. What I can't stand is she thinks because she is RICH that she can act in any matter that she so desires with absolutely no consequence to her. That is until she meets Elizabeth...loved that entire chapter which revolves around their discussion regarding Darcy and not accepting an engagement proposal from him.

I agree with everything everyone's said about Lady Catherine so far - in a novel full of frustrating characters, she's one of the worst. "Ugh" is right. I'm just glad she ends up being useful in the end :)
Staci wrote: "i have read possession too tara! great letters :)
should I read this? "
uhhhh. one day, definitely. i think its probably a must read book for all literature fanatics.
but it wasn't a real enjoyable read for me. maybe coz i was studying it at the time?
should I read this? "
uhhhh. one day, definitely. i think its probably a must read book for all literature fanatics.
but it wasn't a real enjoyable read for me. maybe coz i was studying it at the time?

should I read this? "
uhhhh. one day, definitely. i think its probably a must read book for all literature fanatics.
but it wa..."
I loved it -- but it was a dense read, really heavy, and slow-going. But I was on a big "interstitial fiction" kick at the time, and the fairy tale elements of the one story really kept drawing me on. Had I not had some kind of previous interest in it, I might have given up because it is not a quick read.

I agree with everything everyone's said about Lady Catherine so far - in a novel full of f..."
I love how you phrased that -- in a novel full of frustrating characters. That's so absolutely true. They are all frustrating and totally realistic.


Anyway, I am on around chapter 40, and should get it finished this week as I have LOTS of airport time with a trip to Sydney for work!
OHH I have to ask what is with the ------shire references?? I.just.don't.get.it. And am too lazy to go looking for other sources - can someone help a girl out???
AND btw, I reckon Darcy is totally RAD - that whole "even though your're beneath me I love you" scene at the Collins' place was GOLD! It's funny, I recall in screen versions of the book I have seen I just didnt like him as much as I have in the book. Weird!
OK back in my behind-the-times box now....LOL!

And it kind of wrapped up too quickly - after all that writing she finished the book in like 3 pages after Elizabeth and Darcy getting together! Anyway, still really enjoyable.