Mockingjay
discussion
The sad truth of Gale killing Primrose. Intentionally or a horrible mistake.
message 151:
by
Kim
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Aug 19, 2012 10:13AM

reply
|
flag
I dont think gale intended on killing prim and i didnt particularly care when she died :/ and i hate peeta. Ik this makws me sound cruel but i dont like peeta at all



it dosen't matter if the were the children of the capitol, killing them was wrong, even if it did end the rebellion, so wither he killed prim or not, wither he just made the bomb or set it off, there is no way he is not guilty of a terrible thing

it dosen't matter if the were the children of the capitol, killing them was wrong, even if..."
How is he guilty of a terrible thing if he didn't do it?
In the real world people make guns, bombs, grenades, etc.. with the sole purpose of killing people. Do we say they're guilty? No we don't. What about the soldiers that use these weapons to kill, do we say they're guilty? No we honor them and call them heroes


But in my second reading, Katniss' exchange in the weapons room with Gale and Beetee seems a lot more significant: Katniss questions if the designs are crossing some sort of line. Beetee has a look of doubt on his face, which I now see could have been doubt over the morality of his own designs. And Gale responds, "Beetee and I have been following the same rule book President Snow used when he hijacked Peeta." Snow had turned something safe into a weapon... which tells me they were cogniscent of how the bombs would be used, even if indirectly.
Could Gale have known more though? Gale is the kind of guy that would sacrifice lives for the greater good, so it is not impossible that he could have known the intention of the bombs but highly unlikely since he looks out for Katniss' family.
Then what makes me doubt his ignorance, is that after Prim's death he disappears to D2. Surely he would want to check on Katniss and maybe her mother during their time of need, right? I can't think of a reason he would stay away unless he felt responsible for Prim's death. Even if it was indirectly.

it dosen't matter if the were the children of the capitol, killing them was w..."
i have never called soldiers hero's, and it was innocent people as welll, im not one to watch the news alot, so i have no idea if half the time soldiers are really killing the bad people or not
however what i do know, is this,the children that will killed in the bomb, the med team, they were not the bad people here.

it dosen't matter if the were the children of the capitol, kil..."
So where in the book does it say that Gale dropped the bomb and killed the med team? It doesn't. Gale is not guilty of anything. He is just the inventor, he can not be held accountable for the actions of another

it dosen't matter if the were the children of the..."
No he didn't directly set the bomb off, but he created it. He designed a weapon that functions by playing on people's compassion. He was a party to a horrible murder so though he is not solely responsible, how can he not feel guilty?
Even if he could manage to wash his hands of any responsibility for being the creator of something that killed innocents, he crossed a line by acting on hatred/anger to come up with fantastically creative killing devices.


it dosen't matter if the were the ..."
He should and probably did feel guilty for creating it but he was not responsible for the deaths. That's the discussion here. He didn't kill Prim, he wasn't responsible for all those deaths.
I don't think that Gale killed Prim. He did design the bomb that killed her but I don't think that he personally killed her and knew she was going to be there at the battle. He may not have even known what that bomb was going to be used for, or that it was going to be used. And Prim wasn't supposed to be out there anyway. It was Coin's way of breaking Katniss because, let's face it, Katniss never liked Coin or really, morally supported her. Gale 1)Probably didn't order them to be used. 2) Did not approve Prim going out onto the battlefield. 3)Didn't know Prim was going to be there. 4) And, may have in fact not even known that they were going to be used for that purpose or in that way.
Overall, Gale is definitely not responsible and Coin is 99.9% responsible.
Overall, Gale is definitely not responsible and Coin is 99.9% responsible.


it dosen't matter if..."
But he is responsible. That is the over all message of the book. That no matter what side you are on or what your intentions are, if you are not advocating peace you are a part of the problem. End of story.

it do..."
How do you come to that conclusion?

When the idea ends up killing his own people, including Prim, I think that he understands how awful the idea was. He knows that Katniss will hold him responsible despite Coin deciding how to use the idea. I think that he ultimately believes that he killed her as well. That is why he takes himself away from Katniss.

it do..."
That means everyone is part of the problem.

Margarita wrote: "He killed Primrose. That is all there is to it. He might have had gotten orders to do it, but if he truly loved Katniss the way he said he did, he wouldn't have done it. In the end of the book, to ..."
No. He didn't. If you truly read the book, you would know that President Coin was an evil, self-righteous woman. She never told Gale what the bombs were being used for. He just thought they would benefit the war. Even if you didn't know that, do you really think Gale would do that on purpose?



Where in the book does it say this?




Then you obviously didn't read the book

What? Since when is dropping bombs during a time of war considered terrorism?

Actually, during actual combat, it other soldiers that go in first. In combat, there would not be any civillians around. Sure, there usually a medic in combat but that medic is stilla soldier.
If you remember, it was actually The Capitol that used it the way you are describing against the districts and the rebels. But the Capitol have an army, so there is no reason it would work the same way if the rebels used it. The Capitols army would have had their own medics. The people in the districts would not have been rushing to save The Capitols soldiers.

Then you obviously didn't read the book"
Exactly. When 13 was bombed, Katniss got cutoff from Prim. It was Gale that went and got her. We have every reason to believe that Gale loved Prim as his own sister.

If Gale wouldn't have come up with that design, do you not think Coin would have figured out another way to do the same thing.

To hold Gale responsible for Prims death is ludicrous. And the fact that Katniss does just shows how Ms Collins failed Katniss and readers. Only the die hard Peeta fans/Gale haters feel that Gale should be help responsible. If her readers don't even but that Gale was responsible, then why should we buy the Katniss would feel he is? It was a sloppy and heavy-handed plot device that Collins used. Why didn't her editors call he out on it is beyond me. Catching this kind of nonsense is what editors are for.

195 replies and the title remains unchanged? D'oh!

War is cruel, my friends. War has no rules. It was not him who gave orders to drop parachute bombs. His hands are completely clean. Just Katniss is so dumb, she can´t understand. I find it WAY MORE cruel, that Katniss voted for new Hunger games for Capitol children. THAT was reeeaaally a bad decision.


Gale did not kill Prim. He wouldn't do that knowingly to Katniss. He may have made the bomb and may have launched it but he didn't realise that his own people would be amongst the capitol children. Frankly I had to re-read he ending and there were so many plot holes that it was unbelievable (Why was Prim even there anyway? Ugh!)But yeah, it wasn't Gale.


Though I am team Peeta all the way, I can't blame Gale for something he didn't do. He cared about Prim, maybe even more than he cared about the rebellion and freeing Panem, I'm not sure. He isn't a cold blooded killer, and wouldn't have dropped the bombs without good reason (which he had). Though it is easy to blame Gale for her death, I think it was an accident.

These are the facts:
1) An exploitative regime has taken away the basic civil rights of the people and treats them as slaves for the social elite.
2) They must revolt- as people have done since the dawn of time
3) This revolt required conflict with an ARMED "peacekeeper" force.
4) To face this ARMED force requires weaponry, without which there is no resistance, only slaughter... Everyone return to your coal mine, do not pass go, starve, serve, and send your children to the reaping each year.
Call we all agree the revolt against the capitol had to happen? Can we agree weapons were required and must be created for this to happen?
Gale's idea of attacking a force, then a second delayed attack at first responders has absolutely NOTHING to do with a propaganda scheme to blow up children with bombs disguised as "goodies" dropped from the sky by the "ememy" you want to discredit. Its not even close.
Dropping the bomb IS a war crime.
Gale helped armed the resistance in order to overthrow a corrupt and violent government. It had to be done.
He can not be blamed ONE bit for the people in power who took that goal of necessary revolution and corrupted it into a genocidal propaganda scheme aimed at children of the capitol. Its absurd.

Its a HUGE spoiler and it will appear at the bottom of the book's main page in the discussion topics list-
there are going to be real people who want to drop a bomb on the person who wrote that discussion title, lol..
I'm sure if you changed it to something like "is Gale responsible for the bombs at the end" everyone who read the book would know what you meant without the spoiler of prims death...

Friggin' blockheads. If it was a thread of just five replies I probably wouldn't say anything. But 200 posts? Do you not grasp the concept of what a spoiler is?

Of course he did it on purpose or he had orders, he was mad at Katniss and wanted to get back at her. And my proof look at the ending he is in district 2 with another girl and he made the weapon. (even if he didn't release the bomb because it was his design he killed her by involvement

Gale is an accident of war. He designed the thing. He could never undesign it. Even though it was used in a way the he never intended, he and Katniss would always have that bomb between them.

Killing Prim, not intentional.
Killing medics, intentional. That's what Gale's bomb was designed to do - to kill the 'Prims'.
From Gale's history, he would have found the deaths of the rebel medics to be acceptable. Just as he was with the death of rebels, or rebel sympathizers in the Nut.

Also there's the fact that, intentionally, we never truly know if that was Gale's bomb - or even Coin's - that killed the children. Katniss' theory sounds very likely. But it is never confirmed, and I think that's the way it's meant to be. We, like Katniss, are meant to be kept guessing. And wondering if it is possible to forgive someone who could have killed your sister - never knowing the truth. In Katniss' case, it wasn't.
So. There's really know way of knowing. It's up to the reader to choose. What seems certain is that Gale did not know of the plan to trigger the bombs on the herded children. Firstly, he denied any knowledge of it, and secondly he was on the ground in the lead up and at the time. They were in a war, and it was chaos. He also wasn't that essential to Coin's planning - and much to close to Katniss - to know, most likely. So it seems that even if Coin did order the bombs - which is likely - she would've kept that knowledge close, and especially the order which had Prim on the field. She wouldn't want her early rule tainted by rumours of having intentions to kill a child. So that pretty much rules out Gale's direct involvement with the bombs.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic