TWILIGHT HATERS discussion
Twilight Lover's Topics
>
I STILL DON'T GET IT?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
date
newest »

message 51:
by
Fayla
(new)
Jan 24, 2009 11:02AM

reply
|
flag

2. Characters are poorly introduced.
3. Meyer's 1st person sucks.
4. There is literally no plot. It's only about...
5. Edward and Bella infactuating over each other
6. The book was way TOO long. It should have been 250-300 at the most. Not 500 something.
7. Bella is a Mary-Sue.




To true. Why do none of the Twitard notice this...oh ya...because they are all shallow tweens with the logic centers of peas.
There is a reason that you should not date people like the Vampussie. You NEVER let ANYONE tell you who you should talk to and associate with (unless the person is warning you that the people in question are bad in some way, and has evidance to support their claims), you NEVER date a man with "anger issues" and sure as HELL don't date a man who watches you from windows like a creepy stalker.
Oh, and you don't date BLOODSUCKING VAMPIRES!
And I have a message for Vampussie as well "You are not a vegiatarian, you eat animals. Even if you are biting animals it is still meat. You are not Bunnicula. You do not suck carrots (unless...[insert inuendo here:]). Find another word, dickweed."

Maybe they knew what she was really like: a selfish self-centered snob.

she smells pretty

she smells like dinner"
Fixed for you :D
message 67:
by
The FountainPenDiva, Old school geek chick and lover of teddy bears
(new)

In the first three books, Bella is adamant about not being a mother and up until the last book, is preparing to go to college. In fact, she and Edward have it out because of him using his hidden wealth to get her into an Ivy League school. Suddenly, all of this changes with marriage and pregnancy and some kind of demon-spawn that's killing her and Bella's perfectly fine by that. I mean, is Meyer telling her readership that giving birth, even at the risk of death, is acceptable? Is she telling girls that putting their dreams on hold for a man is okay? It seemed to me that Meyer was trying to preach rather than tell the story.
Interestingly enough, I found Edward's virginity rather refreshing. Considering that most male teenage characters are portrayed as sex-crazed horndogs, his insistence upon remaining chaste until marriage was pretty cool. And I can kind of understand some of his high-handedness. After all, he was actually born in a time when women still deferred to men in all things. In spite of being over 100 years-old, it's not too hard to imagine the cultural changes that he'd witnessed. I'm not sure if I'd call his behavior "abusive", but in some ways he was keeping to the nature of his character.
There are many reasons as to why I hate (or strongly dislike) the Twilight series. And before you assume anything, I have indeed read the books. Why did I read them if I hate them? Well, how do you know you're going to hate a book? To ask that question is just idiotic.
Anyway, back to your original question. For one, the entire piece is a complete mess--Stephanie Meyer's writing is that of a 14-year-old girl on some fan fiction site. She basically rapes a thesaurus (chagrin, anyone?) and writes every sentence in purple prose (look it up).
The characters are undeveloped and lack depth. Who honestly cares how hot Edward is? He's a fictional character who also happens to be an abusive boyfriend. Not only that, but Meyer goes to great lengths to mention his appearance on every single pages that Bella encounters him. By the way, it's not love kiddies. He only lusts for her because she smells like a damn good steak dinner.
The plot itself is just boring. I mean, it may have been somewhat interesting if someone like Stephen King authored it, but Meyer truly butchered the vampire. Also, cliche much? Vampire 'in love' with a human? New girl falls in 'love' with cool guy? Yeah, right. That's very original.
That is all. ;)
Anyway, back to your original question. For one, the entire piece is a complete mess--Stephanie Meyer's writing is that of a 14-year-old girl on some fan fiction site. She basically rapes a thesaurus (chagrin, anyone?) and writes every sentence in purple prose (look it up).
The characters are undeveloped and lack depth. Who honestly cares how hot Edward is? He's a fictional character who also happens to be an abusive boyfriend. Not only that, but Meyer goes to great lengths to mention his appearance on every single pages that Bella encounters him. By the way, it's not love kiddies. He only lusts for her because she smells like a damn good steak dinner.
The plot itself is just boring. I mean, it may have been somewhat interesting if someone like Stephen King authored it, but Meyer truly butchered the vampire. Also, cliche much? Vampire 'in love' with a human? New girl falls in 'love' with cool guy? Yeah, right. That's very original.
That is all. ;)
message 70:
by
The FountainPenDiva, Old school geek chick and lover of teddy bears
(last edited May 15, 2009 07:58PM)
(new)

The problem with Twilight really is that Meyer didn't know what she wanted the books to be. Did she want them to be a sweet and fluffy read for the beach, or was she looking to thinkly disguise her religious beliefs? Was she trying to make Edward the epitome of the romantic and tortured hero, but ended up making him a scary stalker in the eyes of a lot of readers? Was Bella supposed to be an intelligent, self-sufficient, if somewhat klutzy 'every girl' who supposedly dreams of a man who wants only her and is passionately romantic or did she end up coming off as a self-absorbed ditz? I can live with the first three books, but 'Breaking Dawn' was five hours of my life that I will never get back.
I also blame the publishers. Because they were so desparate for the "next" Harry Potter, ended up throwing money and publicity at an author who wasn't ready for prime time. Sad to say, they've all earned big, fat bonuses, the remaining films have already been optioned, and Stephanie Meyer won't be going away anytime soon. In fact, since imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, there's an entire slew of 'Twilight-wannabe' novels hitting the shelves.
Frankly you can never go wrong with the original--Bram Stoker. I would also suggest 'Carmilla' by Sheridan le Fanu, Anne Rice (of course), Poppy Z. Brite, and one of my faves, The Sonja Blue series by Nancy Collins. Oh and Annette Curtis Klause's 'The Silver Kiss' is amazing!

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!
is that better

y do u call Edward(and all of his perfection) deadward
Erin wrote:
y do u call Edward(and all of his perfection) deadward"
He's not perfect. He's an under-developed character written by some yuppy who had a wet dream.
Oh yeah, and he's an abusive boyfriend. That's perfect.
That is all.
y do u call Edward(and all of his perfection) deadward"
He's not perfect. He's an under-developed character written by some yuppy who had a wet dream.
Oh yeah, and he's an abusive boyfriend. That's perfect.
That is all.

It's absolute wish fulfillment. Not to mention, her writing style's just like an epic-long fanfic, so readers need only a tenth of their brainpower.
I also agree about the publishers. Twilight would never get where it is if it weren't for hardcore marketing.

hmmm... i think ill write a twilight fan fic, where ever1 is shown as the idiot that they truly are... and tehn ill come in and destroy the perfect world of the sparkly vamps, with darcula...

I got to see them live here in KC MO. They are even better in person. Sorry...I'm off topic :)

they crack me up... and really, i think theyre just trying to annoy us...

definetaly... XD but then again, i took a sweeney todd personality test and it said that i was most like sweeney, so i REALLY shouldnt be talkin...
UGH!!! OMG UR SOOOOOOOOOOO LUCKY!!!!!!


oh, PLEASE.
So don't hate twilight but you don't love it?
do you think we're stupid?
honestly, you have a pic of deadie and ballsy (oops i mean bella) for your profile pic and you named yourself meghan marie cullen, so there's SOMETHING you must enjoy

Spot on!

