Shut Up & Read discussion
Archives
>
How to review books question
date
newest »


A rough outline is always good then obviously what you liked and what you didn't like.
I don't think there is a formula, but the reviews I like to read the most have a lot of the writers personality in them, not just facts about the book.
Also good to start a discussion about something raised in the book.

If you find a review that stands out to you, ask yourself why. What did you like about the review. If you use a template you like, chances are others will too, and you will attract readers to your blog that are like minded.
Good luck.
I go into writing a review with the idea that I'm telling a friend about the book. When I re-read what I've written it should give them an overview of the book and why I think they should read it. Thinking of it like that helps me to make it more personal too...talking to a friend rather than writing a report.




I very seldom summarize plots in my reviews—GR and most booksellers' websites already do that well enough—but I do it when the novel is brand new, because I know that it won't be so well-known, and that the people who see my review may not have read anything at all about the book before.
On the other hand, I try to keep my reviews short—3-4 paragraphs at the most. Long blocks of text on a screen tend to send a lot of viewers, myself included, into skimming after a while, so I want the essential information to be available quickly. (Yes, I'm a lazy bum, I know.)

General feelings about the writing style/characters and their development. Also information about how a book made me feel and my reactions to it.
I also tend to include any typos or errors in the book too, but that's only because most of what I read is written by indie authors and often they don't catch them all, even when they hire an editor. It's just one more thing I can do to help them get closer to that elusive perfect manuscript! :D

Definitely agree with Lynxie on this one. Except for key points to emphasize what I'm saying, I don't include summaries because, well, they're already on there.
It's hard to get people to comment on your reviews--believe me, I've been trying since this summer and have had mild success on GR and my blog--but stay true to your voice. Ultimately, that's what sets reviewers apart for me. If they inject humor/sarcasm/wit the way they would in real life, then I stay interested in their reviews.
I'll start following you though, sometimes we all need a little help!
Thanks!