Moby-Dick or, The Whale
discussion
Stubb: the second mate or third?
date
newest »


Carl F. Hovde notes here in the Barnes and Noble paperback edition: "That is, the third to be described in this scene."

Of course, that is just Hovde's interpretation. It could have been that it was an error that was missed in editing. If it was intentional, then Hovde's explanation is the only one that makes sense.

I loved the book by the way. The style is elegant and poetic and it is as much philosophy as story telling. I also get a kick out of the voice of the story teller. This is a really beautiful book!

all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Search the word "third" and there it is. I think most browsers can do that.
Anyway, my thought is it is Ishmael's first lowering and his confusion is reflected. Or this is a mistake, which is hard to buy. What do you think?