Reader's Ink discussion
Lonely Polygamist
>
Question #2
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Meghan
(new)
Jun 01, 2012 09:19PM

reply
|
flag
*
As stated earlier, I come from a polygamist family. They however were long gone before I came along. Many years ago, I visited with my grandmother about it, as she was the only one left that knew the "other woman."
They called her Auntie, but the original family never really felt close to the new wife and soon to be family. Grandma said that they tolerated each other but were never close. Udall made the sister wives a lot closer than ours was in real life. I have friends here in Albuquerque that come from polygamist families too. One had four wives, one had three wives, and it's interesting to hear the different ways they let it work.
They called her Auntie, but the original family never really felt close to the new wife and soon to be family. Grandma said that they tolerated each other but were never close. Udall made the sister wives a lot closer than ours was in real life. I have friends here in Albuquerque that come from polygamist families too. One had four wives, one had three wives, and it's interesting to hear the different ways they let it work.

Like non-polygamist families, I suspect there is a massive range in how family dynamics in polygamist households work themselves out. That said, I can't imagine a family where wives SHARE one husband, resources are limited, and a zillion kids are running around without power struggles, competition, desperation on the kids' parts for some attention, and so on. My instinct is that Udall--perhaps in his quest to be nonjudgmental--has painted polygamy a lot rosier than it is in most circumstances. Young girls getting forced into marriages, sexual exploitation (yes, this happens in non-polygamist circumstances too), the cult-like spearation of many polygamists from the rest of world, and so on are very serious aspects of a lot of polygamist compounds that Udall totally overlooked.

At times during the book, I thought Mr. Udall was getting closed to a commentary about how, despite the teachings of the Principle (the husband is the center and head of the family), the husband is really the most disposable part of the polygamist family. That without him, the wives and children could (and in a way, do) function perfectly fine. Mr. Udall got close to that point, but I think he in someways sabotaged it towards the end. Did anyone have a similar reaction to the book? Did Mr. Udall comment on polygamy in a subversive way?


I think a lot of the family dynamics here are due to Golden, and his ever present absence in the family. Even when he is home he is emotionally and spiritually absent. He sleeps on the couch or in his truck. He sets arbitrary rules (no running the track) that aren't followed through for more than a day or too. No one in the family respects him as head of household, which leaves a very confused dynamic. The wives are taught to follow him as leader, and are left scrambling when their leader doesn't lead. This family has already fallen apart before the book even starts, and Golden doesn't recognize it until after Rusty's accident. Even then, when he tries to take control again, he is too weak of a man to rebuild.
As I said, this is what a polygamist family dynamic could be- when the head of the family is as weak a person as Golden, and there is no leadership, absolutely will the family function in chaos and collapse.