The Filipino Group discussion
Books, Books, Books
>
What is your definition of an accomplished reader?
message 1:
by
K.D.
(new)
May 27, 2012 05:43PM

reply
|
flag



To read a number of books is an achievement but a greater achievement is in it's quality of learning process takes place not by quantity of books...I thank you again! hahaha!

Sometimes, it's possible to love the same book with another person, and I start to think, did we read the same book? Bakit ganun ang ugali/pananaw mo?

I also think that an accomplished reader has explored most genres, not only the "important" books but also books that have massive appeal. More later.

Angus, mahirap nga yan. Kaya nga magandang i-open forum. Nagfi-fish out din lang ako ng mga sasagot candidly at di "showbiz."
Charles, it happens! Twice this year. My two American friends commented in my review of "The Immoralist" and "Madame Bovary" that we read the same book(s) differently. When I checked their reviews, oo nga. Iba ang dating sa kanila ng mga books na yon. Kasi nga, we bring our own experiences (biases, prejudices, etc) when we read so iba-iba ang interpretations. Also, sabi nga ni Doris Lessing, the more interpretations that book can generate, the better it is. So, yong mga staightforward that does not elicit more than one interpretation, di naman nya sinasabing pangit pero ang interpretation ko roon, siguro standard or common yong book or yong style ng author.

I agree also to Doris Lessing-the more interpretations the better it is iyon nga lang depende rin sa pagtanggap mo what if para sa iyo eh negative siya? right? pero so far so good you are learning or studying the different aspects/side of book that's what make us different from others and through these you gain friends because you also discover the people who fights for your side either positive or negative views. I thank you again hahaha!

It does not matter kung negative or positive ang interpretation. I think what matters is that the book creates an intended impact to its reader. For example, "Lolita" by Nabokov. Negative talaga kasi pedophilia pero maganda ang pagkakasulat. Ditto to Madame Bovary and Anna Karenina (adultery) pero hindi lang dyan umiikot ang story kasi maraming themes na puwedeng i-deduce or palabasin sa interpretation.

"Bakit kaya ganun kung ano pa ang bawal siya etong masarap basahin"...mukhang malaki ang pinaghuhugutan ng mga istorya hahaha!

Agree ako sa To Kill a Mockingbird (racism), Lord of the Flies (child killing), The Chocolate War (school bully). Pero ang Twilight??? Anong negative dyan at bakit kasama yan sa pagiging accomplished reader??!?!?
Pag bawal kasi mas madalas may shock value. Pag may shock value mas nakakatawag ng pansin. Otherwise, kung 100% positive, baka sa St. Paul mai-tinda ang libro. :)
Nakakatakot ang mga comments ko this morning, parang naghahamon ng hate comments. Patay kasi ang mga threads last week (sabi nga ni Rollie) at kung di ako magpra-prompt (by posting strong opinions), wala na halos nagre-react.

Twilight?-accomplished reader? sabi daw nila hahaha!




I think I can only consider myself an accomplished reader if was able to understand and read those books na gusto kong basahin. Since it's a personal goal, and reading is an activity we do to fulfill our inner/ intellectual senses, di ito dapat idepende sa accomplishment ng iba. There's shouldn't be a specific book title para maging comparison ng dalawang mambabasa. But I must say that there are really titles na feeling mo di kumpleto pagiging reader mo, if di mo pa nabasa. Still, it falls under your personal goal, and personal preferences.

Aenna: I agree with you. It does not mean that if a person reads 2,000 books compared to another's 30, it does not necessarily mean that the former is more accomplished than the latter. No, ma'am. Definitely no.
So, do you think that there is no standard at all? That we should not benchmark ourselves as reading is a personal matter? But how do you determine those books "na gusto mong basahin?" Di ba parang pag nabasa mo ang mga yon, parang fulfilled ka (masaya ka) so eventually yan ang magiging definition mo ng "accomplished reader." Oh, I am sure that kung matapos mo yan, may mga bagong libro na namang madadagdag so di mo pa rin naabot ang pagiging "accomplished reader" mo. But at some point, titigil ka, say manlalabo ang mata mo at gusto mo malaking letra o audio na lang pero tuloy pa rin (kasi reader ka nga).
Can you give me the books that you have currently in your mind na kung mababasa mo, parang complete ka na sa pagiging reader?

So far, the ones I want to read are:
The Great Gatsby, Utopia, 1984, We, works of Bronte Sisters, etc.
I'm sure you're silently questioning why there are no Filipino writers on my list... (guilty?) that's because I haven't gotten around to knowing what their works are all about... ignorant I know... but, eventually, as my taste in books become more mature, I'll make time for them.

And yes, the books to be read accumulate overtime. But I will definitely stop at a certain time, if I feel like it. If dumating yung time n malabo na mata ko, or di na ako makabasa, I think I would definitely feel that I am an accomplished reader, and the time I spent to read is enough. After all, I read not to suffer, but to primarily entertain myself and gain additional knowledge.

Ha ha. The threads are "silent" last week so I am trying to liven up by posing thought-provoking questions. Just doing my moderator's job :)

Ha ha. The threads are "silent" last week so I am trying to liven up by posing thought-provoking questions. Just doing my mode..."
i'm not sure it was silent since, I've been silently reading all the comments... but, this is thought provoking indeed...




I also think that there's no such thing as an accomplihed reader. Accomplished means finished. And for readers like us, we don't know the word FINISHED. As soon as we closed the last page of a book, we pick up another one.
Like what was said above, only you can measure if there's anything to be measured in the life if a bookworm. Quantity also doesn't matter. I can always say I've read 1000+ books but what if they're all erotica? Does it say something about me being as a reader?
What about those read just the bible? Are they not readers?
I will only consider myself an accomplished reader the moment I decided not to read a book anymore. That's the only time I can really measure all the books I've read.

Onga!

1. Reads and finishes a book for pleasure
2. Reads and finishes a book for study (writing style)
3. Reads and finishes a book for self-development (classics, literary fiction)
4. Reads and finishes a book for better understanding of the world (history, non-fiction, biography, etc.)



for me it means, you were able to read and understood what you have read.


I like this one! It takes a lot of BRAVERY, PATIENCE and DETERMINATION to finish a book you absolutely do not like. haha



For me, every time I finish a book & linger with its story makes me feel "accomplished". Until I read another and another and another. From one book to another. It goes on and on.
Before, I consider myself as an accomplished reader, if I was able to put into action the philosophies of my all-time idol, Ayn Rand. I want to be like Roark, like Francisco d' Anconia. But most times I fail. Then I refuse to be disappointed with myself and move on. Just like Atlas, I shrugged.

While looking at ideas to explore the topic further I chanced upon this quote which, to me, says a lot about being an accomplished reader. So it doesn't really matter what type of books you read, as long as you love reading then its all good. =)

I also believe that reading is passion and by being pasionate about it, finding joy and self-fulfillment when finishing a book, then I believe you are on your way to being an accomplished reader.

The man in this article read around 10,000 books. Browsing through the list of books that he read reveals that the man prefers bestsellers. There is also a gaping lack of classics, world literature, and I daresay poetry and nonfiction.
I am amazed at the number. It is an accomplishment. But I would have been more impressed if the books are more diverse. I was a bit disappointed when I haven't seen the names of Tolstoy or Dickens or Austen or James in the list. Or Ishiguro or Mitchell. Or Robinson. But there's one Saramago.