Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

47 views
Archived > Archived MSS and Typescripts?

Comments Showing 1-14 of 14 (14 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Greg (new)

Greg | 108 comments As an historian, I consult a number of documents and unpublished typescripts in the course of the research I do each year and I'd like to be able to record those that I have read fully on GR. However, noting that the Librarian Manual neither includes nor excludes manuscripts or typescripts kept in archives and libraries, but taking into account the discussion about legal documents, would I be right in saying that these should be excluded from inclusion as books?

Or is there allowance made for those manuscripts and typescripts that are bound, as opposed to those that exist in the form of a scroll, or as loose leaves kept in a folder? In other words, is binding as a book the key factor for inclusion or must a work have been published (as in the case of ebooks)? And what about microfilm copies of such manuscripts and typescripts?


message 2: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Can you give some specific examples?

Are such items listed on the Library of Congress site? If so, can you link to some examples?


message 3: by Greg (new)

Greg | 108 comments Well I'm based in Ireland so the items I use would not be listed on the Library of Congress site but I'll pick a couple of items from online archive or library catalogue entries and post links to these shortly so that you can get an idea of what I mean.


message 4: by Greg (new)

Greg | 108 comments Here is an example of one work that I've consulted in a municipal library. It is a photocopied typescript calendar of diocesan documents compiled in 1982 and available in this library for about 30 years in the form of two softbound volumes, one 125 pp long, the other 250 pp in length. Each volume has a separate catalogue entry but the second volume does not have a distinct title page as the compiler had not intended to split the text into two volumes. Therefore, the proper title of the work should be 'Calendar of the Records of Christ Church Cathedral, Waterford 1210-1833 A.D.'

The first part is: Calendar of the Records of Christ Church Cathedral, Waterford 1210-1672 A.D.

The scond part is: Calendar of the Records of Christ Church Cathedral Waterford 1672-1833

Incidentally, I understand that the work is due to be published but this might have been delayed due to the current economic situation.

In the same library, there is another calendar of documents compiled by the same historian (Julian C. Walton) in 1982-4 but which is not listed in the library's computerised catalogue. This is a stapled (but unbound) 37-page photocopied typescript entitled 'Waterford material among the salved chancery pleadings at the P.R.O.I. (1560-1640)'. It is kept with other assorted documents in a box file and is given an 'item' number - 21/26 (which means box #21, item #26). Since I read this typescript work last month, it would be nice if I could include it in my read list but I'm not sure if it qualifies as a 'book' or not.


message 5: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
These are unique documents? Or each is one of only a handful of instances?


message 6: by Greg (last edited Apr 04, 2012 12:05PM) (new)

Greg | 108 comments That library has a second copy of the 'Calendar of the Records of Christ Church Cathedral, Waterford 1210-1833 A.D.' in two parts, both of which are catalogued (one of them not very accurately). I am not aware of any other copy of this text that is publically available. The same can be said for 'Waterford material among the salved chancery pleadings at the P.R.O.I. (1560-1640)'. So I guess that there are at least two copies of the former work and one of the latter (there could be more if the compiler had deposited copies in other locations but I'm not aware of this).


message 7: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Ok, so there are no more than a handful of each. And they have never been published, including as an ebook.

I would lean towards these not qualifying as books for GR purposes, but I welcome input from other librarians. Especially others with experience with similar items.


message 8: by Greg (new)

Greg | 108 comments I've never added any manuscripts or typescripts on the basis that they are not publications but I'd be interested in what people think about this. There are the related issues of publications on microform and whether a thesis not made available through a service like PROQUEST or University Microfilms International should count as a book or not.


message 9: by César (last edited Apr 06, 2012 08:15PM) (new)

César Lasso (cesarlasso) | 15 comments My question has some similarity with this thread. Can I add manually and shelve MA and PhD theses available for download - even if they don't have an ISBN?


message 10: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
If they are publicly available (not on a site that requires a password or subscription), then those are technically considered ebooks.


message 11: by César (new)

César Lasso (cesarlasso) | 15 comments Ufff... I guess they are very easily available, but to access to University databases or even scribd.com, where some are also available, you have to register for free... Maybe that eliminates 80 or 90% of the theses I have access to :(


message 12: by Greg (new)

Greg | 108 comments rivka wrote: "If they are publicly available (not on a site that requires a password or subscription), then those are technically considered ebooks."

Does public availability extend to paper documents in a library then? It could be pointed out, by the way, that you don't have to visit a library or archive in person to view documents as copies can often be ordered and mailed instead. And since non-digitised theses can be ordered via inter-library loan (with exceptions) that would also make them more available.


message 13: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Greg wrote: "Does public availability extend to paper documents in a library then?"

No, just to the definition of whether something has been published as an ebook. If those same documents were to be made publicly available as PDFs (for instance), they would count as a published ebook.


message 14: by Greg (new)

Greg | 108 comments Oh OK.


back to top