Vaginal Fantasy Book Club discussion
2012 Archives
>
Apr 2012: P.O.V.
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Karo
(new)
Mar 30, 2012 05:26PM

reply
|
flag









That being said, I agree the switch was pretty jarring at first. I however was able to roll with it and didn't really affect my reading very much. Still the author probably could have done a better job with signaling to the reader when to expect the POV shift.

I found the Rhy's POV to be rather shallow in the beginning, it was more focused on him telling the reader that Mina would be "his" and that he must have her, but didn't try to reason out why or give any context to why he would feel that way.
I can appreciate that the author would want to keep some of the mystery from the reader, but I wonder if more hints could be given, or if it would have been better to postpone his POV. It really irked me that his POV at the beginning of the novel was obscured where later on the author was more open in sharing his backstory and feelings.

@Amanda good points regarding Rhys' POV. Especially his first few POV parts. I could see how they could be considered fairly shallow, however I think by the end of the book his POV were more than just "she's mine" (although that was still pretty constant throughout). I don't think there is any reason defined for why he initially must "have her." Maybe it was just initial lust that turned into something more.


Also, I have to admit that while I loathed Rhys for being such a massive jerk, I did enjoy the POV switches for the sheer smut...

Why did i picture austin powers while reading this comment?


Oh gosh, that would have been so difficult! They could have at least swapped to a different person or something.

Gotta say the steamy parts were a LOT steamier when they include Rhys' POV :-D

I never actually counted how many times Rhys said "shag" in the book, but it was quite a lot. Almost as many times (I think) as Mina said "Oh Blue Heavens!"


Exactly what I was thinking.

I totally agree with this. I see why the shifts were necessary; without them, the book would have been too "rapey" to be enjoyable. But they weren't very skillfully done. Having said that, the fact that a few sentences clued me in to the narrator of that particular section speaks volumes about Brooks' understanding of characterization. Mina's sections were clearly different from Rhys', which is harder to pull off than it seems. Lots of authors try to tackle multiple POVs and fail spectacularly--I don't think Brooks is one of them.

... a few sentences clued me in to the narrator of that particular section speaks volumes about Brooks' understanding of characterization. Mina's sections were clearly different from Rhys', which is harder to pull off than it seems. Lots of authors try to tackle multiple POVs and fail spectacularly--I don't think Brooks is one of them. "
Ansolutely, once I got into the rhythm that they spoke in and words they would use it wasn't much of an issue. As characters they were very distinct.
I wonder how Brook accomplished that? Only writing from one POV a day? She did keep them very distinguishable.



But as the chapters went on I'd want to know what Rhys was thinking and there he's be and then it'd switch back just as fast.