Beyond Reality discussion
Short story discussions
>
Nebula Nom: The Axiom of Choice, by David W. Goldman
date
newest »





The author got the folky stuff and the touring details down, and I guess I could really relate because that's my life too, though part-time these days. That said, I would never ever get on a tiny Cessna at night with a drunk pilot, and I had trouble feeling for someone whose problems stem from that one incredibly stupid choice.
I actually thought the gimmick was perfect here, in the way it echoed the whole determinism vs. free will theme of the story. I kinda groaned when I started reading, thinking he was really going to write a story in that format and not looking forward to hop-skipping around the story, but when I saw how he was using it, I thought it was clever and appropriate. The character's life was something I could relate too (if not for the choice Sarah mentions in the post right before this one!). The ending was moving. I actually would sign up to read a longer version of this one - which is always a good sign for a short story.
Hmm. Good question. I guess it's literally science fiction in that it's built around a scientific axiom? Plus the Choose Your Own Adventure format is often associated with fantasy role-playing like D&D, I think? I know it's a bit of a stretch.
I agree with Stefan - I liked the gimmick. I thought it was an unusual way to explore the whole idea of free choice. But I'm not sure, either, what makes it speculative fiction....

Like Stefan, I liked the gimmick and feel it works very well with the underlying theme.
In regards to the initial choice mentioned by Sarah and Stefan, was that a choice of free will anymore than any other "choice" offered in the story?
". . . an axiom is a logical statement that is assumed to be true. Therefore, its truth is taken for granted within the particular domain of analysis, and serves as a starting point for deducing and inferring other (theory and domain dependent) truths." - yanked shamelessly from Wikipedia
The story directly confronts the idea that freewill is an axiom, that it can never be proven because it is impossible for us to know the paths not taken. In fact, the lack of viable other choices reinforces the idea that freewill is only an illusion, and that any postulates based upon this axiom are in of themselves faulty. (What a nightmare of a statement. I think I might go mad if I knew for certain that this was true.)
At the same time, the ending gives the impression that it was the lack of choice that was the illusion, even though it does nothing to show any other choice available.
No conclusions, but I have a feeling I'll be thinking about this story for a long time, and that is the sign of a good story. There's no doubt in my mind that this sits squarely in the realm of SF.


Is it a sign of impending madness when you start replying to yourself? :D
In regards to my quote:
How often is it that we do this to ourselves? We seem to convince ourselves that there are no other choices, other paths, available. I know I have done this, and I have seen others do it as well.
The ending very blatantly only offers one choice. However, it is also a kind of parallel with the start of the story, which in of itself gives the impression that those multiple paths were available and viable all along, if the character had only been willing to see them and take them.

Here it is in audio format, free from Podcastle :) (no, I don't work for Podcastle, I just love them lots.)
http://podcastle.org/2012/06/05/podca...
*Please note: This story is in PDF form at the link provided on the Nebula Awards page. If anyone finds it online for free in another format, please let us know.