Twilight
discussion
Can somebody explain why Edward is so in love with Bella in the books!
message 1:
by
Maddie
(last edited Feb 21, 2012 05:57PM)
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Feb 21, 2012 08:22AM

reply
|
flag





That makes sense, thanks.



I understand the initial attraction: Bella smells good, Edward can't read her thoughts, she's obviously attractive, and she's new. But from then on I don't understand it. In the books, both Twilight and Midnight Sun, Edward keeps talking about how Bella thinks differently from everyone else her age. But I really don't see it. I think that Bella is so ordinary and generic that she's boring. I never understood what made Bella interesting. She has no real hobbies, no interests in her life besides Edward, and for all that talk of how mature Bella was for her age in Book 1, she sure didn't act like it for the next couple of books. Nothing characterizes her except her clumsiness. She was into classics in the first book, but that interest kind of disappeared.
I understand Bella's attraction to Edward - he's smart, different, hot - but I don't understand his. :)
(no offense to any Twilight lovers out there!)


He is so used to knowing every persons thoughts that this is new and challenging for him. It's an obsession in my opinion. Even in the last book once she finally learns to control her "mind shield" he asks her to remove it so that he can see what she's thinking for once. I might be wrong but I think that's what it is.


imagine edward being able to read her mind, with all the discriptions she said about him in one look, he would have shunned her for sure

profusely agree. that's why i'm against people taking it as the ultimate love story. it's not a good example


She's pretty even though she thinks of herself as plain. She's caring, responsible, and thoughtful.
Those might be some of the reasons, but it goes beyond that, I'm sure.
Nya wrote: "because he is. there is no explanation for love."
I agree. :)

That's the thing. Nothing at all, apparently though he can't read her mind and her blood is yummy to him. Personally, I think it's a fasination he mistook for love. I'm not saying ordinary is a bad thing though. It just makes a boring book.

Aww, that's sweet. :)

But he says hes waited for Bella like forever, and theres a lot of more facinating people, he could have had. I just don't see why Bella. I mean, I know her blood smells, like, awesome, and everything, but it's just really annoying to me.


But he says hes waited for Bella like forever, and theres a lot of more facinating people, he could have had. I just don't see ..."
Well, not everyone has the same definition of fascinating. Typically people think loud, adventurous and outgoing is more interesting, but not everyone does. I tend to like quiet, dorky guys myself.

I don't think it's love. Vampires don't love, they lust.
Like other people have said--love is strange and we don't get it. But seriously....

I don't think it's love. Vampires don't love,..."
After awhile Tyler, Eric (and I'm guessing most of forks) seem to lose interest, so it wasn't really all of them.
That's debatable; I suppose it depends on your definition of love. I can't really call it just lust because vampires seem to bond on more than just a physical level. What is love but surging brain chemicals? Is there a love beyond the biological aspect of it? I'd like to think so.

I don't think it's love. Vampires don't love,..."
Lust?

wow u changed my point of view... yes ur correct..


And the fact he can't read her, but you have to remember, once a vamp falls in love or finds his mate, its not human but a 100 times more intense! Thats why I prefer fantasy love stories, because there so unrealistic I love em!

We must remember that the books are from Bella's point of view, she thinks she is nothing special and he's everything amazing. That's the way she sees herself, evidently everyone else perceives something else. Isn't that often the way how you see yourself is not how others see you.
And as the books are from her point of view most of the text is her internal monologue and I think if we are all honest most of our internal monologues are quite whiny...

We must remember that the books are from Bella's point of view, she thinks she is nothing special and he's everything ama..."
Excellent points.

Forgive me
I think fearless is the wrong word, she's brave, to the contrary she is full of fears, hardly fear-less, but that doesn't stop her taking what action she can, so she's brave.

good point, brave not fearless

coz he's attractive..


I'm going to have to defend Kristen Stewart here--I think she does a great job with what she's given. IMO it was Edward who was mis-cast. I do agree there's a lack of chemistry there. On-screen, I thought there was a lot more chemistry between KS and TL.

While many see Edward as controlling, the truth is that he is protective, sometimes overly protective. He was never able to control Bella or even get her to follow his advice born of a hundred more years experience and knowledge of the world than she had. She ran to sacrifice herself to James, ran into the vampire den of death to go after him, constantly escaped her protection to see Jake when it was known a hoard of newborns and a vengeful Victoria were after her, etc. Edward had no control and very little influence on Bella's behavior. It isn't controlling to try to protect a pathological martyr from herself.


No Midnight Sun is in the Twilight Saga, it's the 1.5. Like it's between Twilight and New Moon. It's twilight from Edward prospective.



all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic