Outlander
question
Should I let it stand alone?

Hi everyone,
I'm just rereading outlander for the third time, and STILL debating on whether or not to continue with the series. I get the impression that it just sort of trails off, with a few high points. I read Twilight when it first came out, and loved it, and stuck with it all the way through, but looking back on it, sometimes wish I'd just left it at that, since Breaking Dawn was just a mess in my opinion, and none of it stood up to the first book.
Considering this, is Dragonfly in Amber and so forth truly worth it, or should I simply leave it at Outlander?
I'm just rereading outlander for the third time, and STILL debating on whether or not to continue with the series. I get the impression that it just sort of trails off, with a few high points. I read Twilight when it first came out, and loved it, and stuck with it all the way through, but looking back on it, sometimes wish I'd just left it at that, since Breaking Dawn was just a mess in my opinion, and none of it stood up to the first book.
Considering this, is Dragonfly in Amber and so forth truly worth it, or should I simply leave it at Outlander?
reply
flag
As Diane stated, once you cross the line into the second book, you really have to commit to several more, and though the series is one of my personal favorites, it does become more historical fiction than romance. If what you like about Outlander is the love story, and you don't want to make a big reading commitment, then stay at the one book. Of course, just my 2 cents.
I liked Dragonfly in Amber less than Outlander.
After you read the 2nd you can't really NOT continue with the next because of certain reasons I will not mention (for fear of spoiling things).
The third one, Voyager, made it worth it for me. It's right up with their Outlander (and if not maybe a very very close second in my heart).
I continued with the next two (Drums in Autumn and Fiery Cross), they were okay. I think they were a little more scattered; they lacked in focus, especially the 5th one. I still enjoyed them though and I'm going to continue with the series.
So depends on you. It could very well be a stand-alone; since Outlander is the best in the series (in my opinion).
After you read the 2nd you can't really NOT continue with the next because of certain reasons I will not mention (for fear of spoiling things).
The third one, Voyager, made it worth it for me. It's right up with their Outlander (and if not maybe a very very close second in my heart).
I continued with the next two (Drums in Autumn and Fiery Cross), they were okay. I think they were a little more scattered; they lacked in focus, especially the 5th one. I still enjoyed them though and I'm going to continue with the series.
So depends on you. It could very well be a stand-alone; since Outlander is the best in the series (in my opinion).
Keep going! For one thing, the books are so long, you won't lack for reading material for ages. :) And the love story of Jamie and Claire is worth the time spent. That said, I really wish that Herself would wrap it up. The last two books - so far - have been a little wordy and almost repetitive, but they're still worth the read. I have all the books and I'll buy number 8 when it's released. Voyager (#3) is my favorite.
I am nearly finished 'Dragonfly in Amber'. so far so good, i luv them. Where can I find Jamie in modern day. I also love to read about the lifestyles in that era and the historical facts are pretty accurate so far. Was going to try another book after this one but i think i will go straight to Voyager.
I'm in the same predicament. Thank you for posting the topic!
I enjoy the historical fiction more than the romance, although romance certainly does help you become attached to the characters. I'd at least read on to Dragonfly, then decide. After all, you just can't leave it at Claire becoming pregnant with Jamie in France, can you? It's a wonderful happy ending, but don't you want to know more?
This is my favourite series. I have read and reread it MANY, MANY times over the last 10 years. NEVER gets old. It does get a little long in places, with the description and historical references, but the detail about the intricacies of their lives back then is SUPER interesting...at least I think so! ;) But, if you're just not into the past at all, I wouldn't really recommend it.
By all means stop now if you want to miss out on some really great stuff. I read the whole series. Yes, like all long series it has a few slow points, but so does life. And that's what these books are a story of -- life, over and through time, life and a love that truly lasts.
I think you should read on. Clare and Jamie's bond is so much more intense as it develops over time. With their many sorrows come many joys, and it is unique to see how their love develops and withstands the trials of the life they have chosen to make, whether a part or together.
It can stand alone - but the rest of the series is well worth reading. Its pretty unique in genre and historically fascinating. A little too much romance at times (you might get sick of how many times Claire tries to describe the colour of Jamie's hair)... but otherwise - I loved it!
I found the books easier via Audiobook that regular reading - of course, I commute 1.5 hour each way 5 days a week so I can listen to a lot of 'book'
I only read Outlander...and actually didn't know it was a series until like a year after I read it. So obviously I think it can stand alone. It was a great book! And the open-ish ending didn't bother me at all.
I am currently stuck on Fiery Cross. I love the series, but Fiery Cross just seems to be dragging on. I went back to it a few times and each time picked up a new book. I plan to finish it eventually, but I do wish more would happen. The day to day stuff is fine, but it can be too much sometimes. Again, I am not far into it, so I am not sure what happens later, but at this time I am taking a break.
I would suggest reading on though. Enjoy! :)
I would suggest reading on though. Enjoy! :)
I'm actually 80% through with the Fiery Cross. I do take huge gaps of time between each book. I am enjoying it but I am more of a historical fiction reader than romance. There is more than enough romance in it for me. I enjoy reading about the little everyday life of the times.
I guess it also depends on your age. In the Fiery Cross, the main characters are around 50. If you are more into teenage stories, this may not be your cup of tea although there is younger generations in the story.
I guess it also depends on your age. In the Fiery Cross, the main characters are around 50. If you are more into teenage stories, this may not be your cup of tea although there is younger generations in the story.
I love THE OUTLANDER.but I will probably leave it as a stand-alone. I have read some excerpts from the next few books, and I don't think my heart or head can stand any more tears....especially when Claire must return to present day.....
Yes! This series is so rich with detail and compelling characters. Because they are very long books it is hard to keep the momentum going, but they still remain my favorite books. My advise would be to keep reading, but give yourself a break between books. In my opinion there is no way to repeat the magic of the first Outlander book, but the rest are still well worth the read.
You have to read them all!! I have read 1 - 5 (I have yet to read "A Breath of Snow and Ashes") at least 3 times each. Now, I will have to read them all again so I can catch myself up. They are wonderful books, and since I lived in Scotland, and that is where my family is from, I really love them!
This series can not be compared to Twilight! Read on, I don't think you will regret it. I'm halfway through Fiery Cross and I love it so much, but like someone else said...I love historical fiction and just the description of their daily lives fascinates me.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic