The Amulet of Samarkand
discussion
I wouldn't want this turned into a movie
date
newest »

message 1:
by
MizziQ
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Feb 20, 2012 07:22PM

reply
|
flag
*


If the movie was done thoughtfully, by someone who knew and truly explored the book series, I think the movie could be done and be a massive success. Of course, in the wrong hands it could be a flub...it all depends on who's at the helm.
As far as the footnotes go though, I can picture it now and I would love it. Granted, not all of them would be included, but were they to just pause the movie in the mid of action, and do a bit of voice-over, it'd be hilarious, because that's exactly how it feels when reading. Just an idea anyway.


wow!! really??

me too!! Although Johnny Depp would be the most predictable option.. never the less!!

so true.. I wonder how they will show Bartimaeus' form in the other realm..

As for the cast, I just want them to look similar to their descriptions in the book. ..."
Perhaps they can do a voice over whenever Ptolemys form comes forth.


Of course, I suppose there are some ways of getting around this difficulty, but they would involve major changes in the premises of how demons are depicted in the books. One possibility would be to minimize Bartimaeus’s changes, and allow him to change only when the plot calls for it and when it would be clear from the context which character he’s supposed to be. Another would be to give him some unchangeable physical characteristic – for example, horns – that remains unchanged even when he changes form (yeah, it’s a silly example – it’s just something off the top of my head [pun not intended!] based on how Bartimaeus is depicted on the cover art of the books).
There’s also the problem of losing Bartimaeus’s very distinctive narrative style, which is easily the most enjoyable part of the series. A good script writer and a talented voice actor could still make it work, though. I really like the idea of Johnny Depp as Bartimaeus’s voice.
On the other hand, I think the books really lend themselves visually to the film medium. I imagine the London depicted in them to be a sort of cross between a Gothic and a Steampunk world. The description of Prague in The Golem’s Eye is also great – it would be awesome to see that on film. A creative art director could make really unique movies of these books.

So, I shall bide my time and wait. If there is a movie, I will most definitely go and see it. If not, I will be most happy to dream.
THey would ruin it like PJO!

Footnotes are HILARIOUS, love Barty.

AGREE
This book needs to be a movie like LOTR! And they NEED to include footnotes, somehow, or i am not buying.

Like, I watched the second Percy Jackson movie, and like, 99% of it had nothing to do with the book. This book is the same way!





Tim Burton is a good director- don't get me wrong, but I would hate if he took this on. The books don't have a Burtonesque feel to them and he wouldn't give it the depth it deserves. Plus, if Burton directed it then Johnny Depp would be a main character and that would be awful. For Bart you need someone with comedic expertise, and we don't need another "Alice in Wonderland" from Burton.

The thing I enjoyed most of the series is the charming personality of our main character which is especially evident in his thoughts: so this is one hell of a problem!
The other one, as some have already pointed out, is the number of forms taken by Barty. Not to talk about the other place which is basically a... not-place?
One way or another I would go watch the movie anyway... fingers crossed! :D
all discussions on this book |
post a new topic