Hamlet
discussion
Ophelia- character with depth or simply a simple?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Ashley
(new)
Feb 10, 2012 09:20AM

reply
|
flag




Ashley wrote: "Many writings about Ophelia describe her as simply a symbol. I feel that there is more depth to her character, and that she serves an important role in Hamlet. What do you think?"
I have to agree with you. I think Ophelia also had more depth then people think she did. Ophelia going insane and her actions before she went insane are definetly relavent to the story. I do blame Hamlet for her death though I think If he had been more understanding of the pressure from her father things would have turned out different! does anyone agree or disagree?
I have to agree with you. I think Ophelia also had more depth then people think she did. Ophelia going insane and her actions before she went insane are definetly relavent to the story. I do blame Hamlet for her death though I think If he had been more understanding of the pressure from her father things would have turned out different! does anyone agree or disagree?
Teresa wrote: "Ophelia's character may be weak, frail, and dependent, but the implications of those traits is of a complex nature. Ophelia defines herself through men, and when she is chastised rebuked, and rejec..."
I completely agree with you,however I dont like that she is so weak as to depend so much on Hamlets view of her
I completely agree with you,however I dont like that she is so weak as to depend so much on Hamlets view of her


But yes, I agree with your comments, and I don't think she's as weak, boring, or passive as she's been made out to be :) This is Shakespeare after all.

Juliet, a strong female character? Maybe not she is just as naive as Ophelia, if not more so.



"Twas Aeneas' tale to Dido and thereabout of it..."
