Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Archived
>
How do I help?
date
newest »


How did you see that, just by opening each record? Can you tell me how to do that, and then I'll fix my own books, first? It fixes it for a lot of people that way.
I will be uploading scanned images this week, especially to replace the ones that got removed by accident. And, I've been randomly scanning through bookshelves and restoring some German books.
I will be uploading scanned images this week, especially to replace the ones that got removed by accident. And, I've been randomly scanning through bookshelves and restoring some German books.


There is so much work to do. I commented to my brother, who is also retired, that I've found a job.
I had to change the settings on my shelves, as I wasn't displaying all of that info. Now I know how to sort them, and to find out what's missing.
Thanks, Audrey, & Elizabeth!
Thanks, Audrey, & Elizabeth!
I'm trying to be systematic about this; otherwise, I feel like I'm chipping away at a boulder with a toothpick. Maybe it's my math background?
I didn't want to make this my new vocation, either, Elizabeth, but for now it is! :)
I didn't want to make this my new vocation, either, Elizabeth, but for now it is! :)

Sounds like a good plan. I think I'll start with book covers, and go from there. Just looking at my own shelves' missing data gives me plenty to do!


So my main thing that I have been doing is adding original publication dates. That said, I noticed from the change log that you had added a lot of month/days to the original publication date. Did you have a source you were getting them from? I can find the year pretty easily but the month/day, no clue.

Is there a better way to do it? If most publishing sites don't list them and we can't use blogs anymore, how are we supposed to find out?

I've been using worldcat to look at the publication dates on all editions and finding the year or full date if its in the notes. Then I look in the logs to see if anyone entered a month date previously.
One book takes a while...


I'm just trying to clean up my shelves, I used to keep them so up-to-date and now everything's been reverted back to blanks. Sorry if I caused an inconvenience!

What a mess. I show over 600 of my books with no pub date, including recent Rick Riordan, and several with garbage dates like 1100.
Betsy wrote: "Goodreads itself sets the month/day to January 1, when no month/day is entered."
Not for pub dates, at least not usually.
Not for pub dates, at least not usually.


Yeah, I agree. I've been getting dates from publishers sites as well.

Laura, I think your process was okay. The dates for the specific editions I've found on the few I've looked seemed okay if they were there.

Not for pub dates, at least not usually."
I've noticed that occasionally when I've combined editions, the original publication date has been overwritten with 1 January of the year of the latest edition added. I don't know if that was to do with the order I was selecting the items (I've subsequently been careful to always select the main item with the correct publication date first), or if it was a random glitch. I've also come across a couple of records where it says I had set the original publication date to something completely random when I hadn't deliberately changed it at all, but had changed another piece of information.
The original publication date will automatically set itself to the date of the earliest edition of the work when no other date has been set.

How are there so many blanks then? If it automatically sets to the earliest date listed, shouldn't every book have an original publication date then, instead of a blank?

Laura wrote: "How are there so many blanks then? If it automatically sets to the earliest date listed, shouldn't every book have an original publication date then, instead of a blank?"
It only does this when an edition of the work is edited, not if it's just sitting there minding its business. ;)
It only does this when an edition of the work is edited, not if it's just sitting there minding its business. ;)
Audrey wrote: "From my understanding, all information sourced from Amazon was wiped."
If it was imported from Amazon, yes. If a user now goes in and edits the info, it would be identified as from the user. But if their source were Amazon, that is a potential problem.
In any case, publishers often have complete publication dates, and so do some of our import sources. So I certainly wouldn't assume a complete publication date came from Amazon. Just that it did not come from WorldCat.
If it was imported from Amazon, yes. If a user now goes in and edits the info, it would be identified as from the user. But if their source were Amazon, that is a potential problem.
In any case, publishers often have complete publication dates, and so do some of our import sources. So I certainly wouldn't assume a complete publication date came from Amazon. Just that it did not come from WorldCat.

It only does this when an edition of the work is edited, not if it's just sitting there minding its business. ;) "
Just to clarify for my still waking brain, if we edit something else about an edition, say a page number update, after we are done the system should respond by surveying all editions and coming up with an original publication date?
Not sure if that is a significant enough edit to trigger the publication date verification script. I think it may only be triggered by major changes, or changes to publication dates of editions.

And, no, please don't erase what others have entered!

Yes, I have found the same, Cindy. I visit the publisher's websites directly, as a first-line and then add the URL from them - if the URL is blank for a given book and is, of course, appropriate to the specific ISBN.
I hope people aren't assuming info comes from Amazon and then deleting.
What's the plan going forward?