Books, Blogs, Authors and More discussion
Archive Writing Tips
>
How Do You Start A Story?
message 1:
by
Emily V, Head Mod
(new)
Jan 28, 2012 09:30AM

reply
|
flag





Ok, I will confess that I'm not a writer but rather a reviewer, but I have read beginnings that totally knocked it out of the park and beginnings that had me reaching for the snooze button.
I think the big difference is if the author has a clear vision. If you don't have a clear vision for the story, you should work on it more. I can say that it's usually pretty easy for me to pick out an organized author from an unorganized one. What is harder to tell is between the organized authors which ones used an outline and which ones didn't. Some highly organized and very focused authors do not need to use an outline, but if you're struggling to write parts of your manuscript, you should flesh out an outline for the entire story. Tackle it with an outline, and it will be much easier to fill the much smaller gaps left by the outline.
Still, the beginning of the story is usually easiest to write when you've written the rest of it. There are people who just, like I said, have such a clear vision for the book that they can just wham-bam the story from the beginning to the end. There's no shame in not having a clear vision. It happens to everyone, just stay organized and focused!


I agree - I often find I re-write beginnings when I'm going through edits as the first one you write is just to get your writing flowing and start the story - it's usually the last thing I re-edit when the whole thing is clear.




I seldom visualize the beginning of a novel. Usually I have an idea for a happening or series of happenings upon which the novel is based. Writing their progression almost always leads to clarification of their point of origin (as to the story flow..)
cough! cough! Gosh, I'm sorry. That was a horrible bit of talking.
What I mean is that the flow of the story helps to clarify things that have caused its course.
An example: I'm working on a story right now involving the death of a young man and its effect on his family, including a younger brother and his father, who receives the word late. My first image of the story was the young man's death and his father's initial reaction. As I filled that in, I was able to picture how the fellow ended up in the position in which he was killed.
Ultimately, I realized that the best way to start the story was to show the father taking leave of his sons, with some instructions to the older one. The older son (who dies) has shown uneasiness with his situation, which ultimately leads to his death. It works, but my first image was of the father's initial, anguished reaction.
Another story involves a colossal statue crashing down into the middle of a festival throng. The mystery progresses from there. In that case, that scene is chapter 1 - but there is a prologue set several decades before the provides clues to the mystery,
cough! cough! Gosh, I'm sorry. That was a horrible bit of talking.
What I mean is that the flow of the story helps to clarify things that have caused its course.
An example: I'm working on a story right now involving the death of a young man and its effect on his family, including a younger brother and his father, who receives the word late. My first image of the story was the young man's death and his father's initial reaction. As I filled that in, I was able to picture how the fellow ended up in the position in which he was killed.
Ultimately, I realized that the best way to start the story was to show the father taking leave of his sons, with some instructions to the older one. The older son (who dies) has shown uneasiness with his situation, which ultimately leads to his death. It works, but my first image was of the father's initial, anguished reaction.
Another story involves a colossal statue crashing down into the middle of a festival throng. The mystery progresses from there. In that case, that scene is chapter 1 - but there is a prologue set several decades before the provides clues to the mystery,

That's always a good thing to do. One of the most memorial openings I remember is from a Jayne Ann Krentz book. "He was the ugliest man in the bar, and he had his eye on her. It figured."
I love that opening.
Personally, I try to open with an action line.


It's so simple, but it left a definite feeling and impression in my mind. So that's what I strive for. I try not to overdo the intro. I pick something and focus on it. And I always think, "Is this my special interpretation of the S.E. Hinton line?" If not, I rework it until it feels like it is.

"Tuesday was a beautiful California day, full of sunshine and hope, until Harry Lyons had to shoot someone at lunch."
...is one of my favourites.
Although my hands down winner goes to James Herbert and The Magic Cottage:
"Do you believe in Magic?"


Emily wrote: "It's something many of us struggle with. How do you do it?"

-
Chapter One (from The Macgregors)
"Carson," she murmured, lying in bed saying his name into her pillow. She didn't want to move, not just yet anyway, still feeling the warmth of the afterglow of their lovemaking. "I am getting married in two months.We must stop this."
-
Chapter One (Home For the Night)
Life began to unravel for Sarah Winchester on April 1st, 2011. That was the day her husband, Richard Winchester, died. Initially she thought he was playing an April Fool's joke on her when she got the phone call at lunch. He was like that, always playing practical jokes on her and the kids… but he was not going to fool her this time.
The beginning has to grab you, wake and shake and make you want to read more.
Hope it helps.
BDM

That sounds like a good opening line.




Then I look at the line of dialogue, take a lap around the living room, and try to make it wittier.
Once the optimum level of wittiness is achieved, then I start the writing in earnest, with frequent breaks for snacks, internet research on old girlfriends, and general self-loathing.
Writing is hard.


Oh, and see which one people like best? I like that.

I usually just go for it. Start writing and see what happens. Sometimes the first line I write won't be the first line of the finished story - on one occasion my first line ended up in the final scene. I try and do the 'memorable first line hook' thing, but I can't always be bothered. I don't much see the point of titting around and showing off when you're supposed to be establishing mood, character and setting in the opening lines.
Titles come last for me. A few years ago I wrote two short stories with the (I think) brilliant titles Throwing Up With the Joneses and Jake the Pig, I've just never been able to beat them and I never will. So my newer stories tend to have cursory 'that'll do' titles.
Random thoughts from a very disorganised writer, sorry!

Sometimes I'll start with an action and other times with dialogue. Usually my characters take over and do what they need to do or say.




I do a rough plan, then go and live in each scene before I write it. Expect Civilian CasualtiesThe Evil and the Fear. It works for me.
Janet Allison Brown The Walker's Daughter, plans with a degree of rigour that stuns me - as does her work.
It's up to you how you start. It's also a good idea to try each of these techmiques for unusual results.





That's a good starter Bryan




It starts telling where you are, what time it is, and how it all began.
(Thats how I start :) )
Books mentioned in this topic
Tales of the Shonri: City of Lights (other topics)Expect Civilian Casualties (other topics)
The Evil and the Fear (other topics)
The Walker's Daughter (other topics)