Catching Fire
discussion
What's better: The Hunger Games or Catching Fire?
date
newest »

message 51:
by
Dionna
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Jan 30, 2012 08:00PM

reply
|
flag


i loved the entire series, but i enjoyed the second one more than the first one. the hunger games was a great beginning to an amazing series, and the second book just continued on perfectly. I found the second book more exciting too




I LOVE FINNICK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! SSOOOOOOOOO MUCH! HE ROCKs!!

DITO ALL THE WAY!!
GO FINNICK...FORGET PEETA AND GALE LOL

IKR! HES SASSY! lol

FINNICK AS HE WAS DESCIBRED IN THE BOOK, SOUNDED .. WELL GOOD LOOKING. I CANT WAIT TO SEE WHO THE DIRECTORS PICKED FOR FINNICK IN CATCHING FIRE! BETTER NOT BE SOMEONE DUMB!

i already saw...freakin hot!!

SERIUOSLY???!?!?

1. It has Finnick! <3
2. That's when Peeta, and Katniss are most lovey-dovey!
3. The whole 'going-back-into-the-hunger-games' thing was a MIND BLOWING plot twist.
4. Plus Gale and Katniss FINALLY get some smooches, to turn it into a love-triangle! Not just:
Gale: "Hey, I kind of have a crush on her..."
So, yeah! XD



I liked... Mockingjay, The Hunger Games theeeeen Catching Fire.

HOLY CRAP ME TOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I don't know, I know it's a really important part of the story but I thought Mockingjay was so depressing.

Matilda wrote: "I have to go with The Hunger Games... Though with the movie, Catching Fire is definitely better"
Yep yep yep. The Hunger Games movie was a load of crap, but Catching Fire was FANTASTIC!
However, the first book is way better. It took me at least 2 weeks to even get in to CF, and I think Mockingjay was the best out of the 3 books, hands down.
Yep yep yep. The Hunger Games movie was a load of crap, but Catching Fire was FANTASTIC!
However, the first book is way better. It took me at least 2 weeks to even get in to CF, and I think Mockingjay was the best out of the 3 books, hands down.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic