Historical Fictionistas discussion

This topic is about
Someone Knows My Name
Group Read Discussions
>
Jan/Feb '12 Group Read: Someone Knows My Name by Lawrence Hill
date
newest »

message 51:
by
Becky, Moddess
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Feb 05, 2012 05:10PM

reply
|
flag




I loved this book. With some books I feel detached but with this one, I felt all the emotion and I love that. Even if it is mostly sadness. Someone mentioned that it was stupid and naive for her to go off with the african slave traders. Yes it was, but everyone does stupid things sometimes. Aminata was so smart and so strong, it was kind of nice to see a flaw in her regarding her extreme stubborness in getting "home". Regarding the appearance of her daughter at the end...I don't know that I would have chosen that ending myself, but I didn't mind too much because after all the bad things that happened, SOMETHING needed to go right! Someone mentioned it was a huge coincidence, but not really if her daughter had made it to the same country. Aminata was becoming rather well known because of the abolitionists and it would have been fairly easy for her daughter to hear of her and realize who it was. The fact the the Witherspoons took her did bother me though. That didn't seem to fit with my impression of them at all. Regarding her opportunities (ie learning to read) that she may never have had if she stayed in africa, that is one of the things I loved about the book. It showed "the other side" and showed how complicated an issue slavery was, even when we all know that it is totally wrong to enslave someone that way. Lastly, the name of the book: they were probably right in changing the name of it to avoid turning people away. I never knew there was a real Book of Negros either. I like the new name better anyway. There was so much to the story before the Book of Negros and the new name says something about her struggle to be her own person.

I'm glad you enjoyed it!



I found this an enthralling read but was also annoyed with how the author glossed over the scenes that would have conveyed more directly the brutalities of slavery. I would give this book 3 1/2 *.
I prefer the US title, Someone Knows My Name, because it speaks to the complete loss of identity and choice for enslaved people. Nothing is more fundamental to identity than your name. Having that stolen means one has been stripped of everything.
The author did a good job of conveying a little known aspect of African-American history. I knew there were slaves & former slaves who supported the British in return for the promise of freedom and that, for the most part, that trust had been betrayed. I did not know about The Book of Negroes or about the Canadian experience.
Here's what I didn't like. The author consistently removed Aminata from situations so that she either experienced them second-hand or not at all. I understand that he used this tactic to make the story more palatable and readable for a general audience but in every instance he veered sharply away as if he didn't trust the reader to deal with historical accuracy. I found myself shouting at the book to TELL THE STORY!! Stop sugar-coating this for readers and tell the whole story. Slavery in America was a brutal industry. If you're taking us on this journey, don't try to deceive me into believing that it wasn't really all that bad. It's because of that tactic that others can debate whether Aminata was better off as the slave trader claimed.
I read this book over a year ago but here are three instances I can recall where the author does this:
(view spoiler)
The author tells an important story and kept readers engaged in Aminata's story, but allowing Aminata to directly experience or be a first-person witness to some of these events would strengthen the story.

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainm...
Did anyone watch?
