Constant Reader discussion
Constant Reader
>
Do you dare to skip?
date
newest »




And we all skip -- sometimes inadvertently -- when we're tired at night, reading in bed. If I doze, I'll pick up where I thought I was and sometimes it's a page ahead of where I truly was. If nothing is lost, then nothing is lost. Authors have been known to tell us more than we need to know, after all.

Right now I'm slowly but surely reading Cryptonomicon, and on occasion there are pages and pages of code and/or mathematical formulas. Those I skip. But otherwise, I read almost every word.

What's up with "Daring to Skip"? Are the Skip Police peering through your window?


Another technique of mine is jumping back and forth, usually when I'm afraid the ending will be unbearable. So I jump ahead to make sure I can stand it, then go back where I left off... I did this with Every Man Dies Alone. The atmosphere of that book was so oppressive - testament to the author's skill, I think - that I just couldn't read it straight through.
In the case of Dreiser, I just couldn't stand the book or any of the characters; in the case of Fallada, the reading experience was just too powerful for me.
I confess that I'll often read the ending when I'm mid-book (generally because of lack of ability to delay gratification), and that, with regard to most books I've ended up tossing aside unfinished (admittedly few), I took Ruth's read - skim - toss approach.





I think that's against the Geneva Convention.
Kat wrote: "Just realized that although I never skip or skim the printed word, I do skip and skim blogs, posts, and other digitized matter. Interesting. I don't skip when reading my Nook books, though."
See, and I'm more likely to skip and skim when reading an e-version of a book. Odd, that.

When I read passages where I consider an author is droning on and on with details, I’ll skip but wonder if the editor fell asleep instead of trimming the excess. Still, to each his own. Tedious portions worthy of skipping to me are eloquent to others.

I couldn't figure out how. Now I know. haha

I'll often see how much "thickness" is left in the book to read, and I note the number of pages when I start, but other than that I have no idea how many pages I have left to read. Never calculate that.




I think that's the norm--though I don't skip while reading e-books I've come closer to it than when reading print. There was a study (maybe CR has already discussed this) in which readers of the print version of the NYT and readers of the e-version were asked questions about content two weeks afterward, and the readers of print did better. Many who use e-readers say they read faster than with print, maybe that also leads to remembering less. A pretty big disadvantage, and yet I still read many books--certainly not all--on my Nook. There are some powerful advantages as well, of course.

Yes, I spent a lot of years worrying over what I "should" be reading before I felt I'd earned the right to read what genuinely engages me. Some benefits to piling up the decades after all.





I give a book 20 pages or so to capture my interest, and if I'm not feeling it, I skip to the last page or two, and if I want to read the middle after reading the end, then I finish the book. If the author doesn't grab me, I move on.

Flora, I hate songs in a book!



20 pages is more than many an editor would give it. Let me ask this: when you are browsing in a bookstore, how often do you make up your mind in just a sentence or two?


I just abandoned one after the first two chapters. It took some will power to slog through the second one. By the end of the second chapter I still had no idea what or who the story was going to be about. And the writing style left me cold.
Books mentioned in this topic
A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man (other topics)Ulysses (other topics)
Infinite Jest (other topics)
Every Man Dies Alone (other topics)
An American Tragedy (other topics)
More...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/books...